4.

Implementation of the Project

To what extent were the objectives of European Development Plan achieved? How were they reached?
Please comment also on any objectives that were not achieved and describe any achievements that
exceeded initial expectations.
ERP is a part of the ŠRP that links the set goals with the internationalization of the institution as a
strategic development point. Through the ERP document, we have formulated the needs of institutions
such as quality development and internationalization and ways in which the planned European activities
will meet these needs. Internationalization was achieved by bringing school and employees closer to the
European education framework. We gained experience gained during mobility in the educational
process, school program, pedagogical organization and management. The quality of school work has
improved. The quality of teaching, the process of learning and evaluation of achievements have been
improved. Innovative methods for teaching and learning have been introduced. We have increased
intercultural understanding. The teachers who participated in learning mobility acquired new
experiences, which they could later use in their daily work. We have developed new teaching methods,
and with the help of the projects of our Ministry of Education, we have gained new teaching materials
and thus improved the quality of teaching. Participation in the programme has supported the
development of competencies and attitudes, the growth of entrepreneurship, individual development,
the increase in knowledge of other cultures, and the increase in the attitude of an active citizen. It has
also strengthen the European identity of workers. School image has been improved by enriching the
school website through applying new web design. Usage of social networks and other educational
portals have become our daily routine.

If relevant for your project, did you use Erasmus+ online platforms (e.g. EPALE, School Education
Gateway, eTwinning) for the preparation, implementation and/or follow-up of your project?

Preparation, implementation and/or follow-up of projects we use eTwinning. On the eTwinning platform we
realize two projects:’’ Internationalization of school with inovative methods and IKT’’ and ‘’School
internationalization with innovative methods and ICT’’. Institution for the structured course in Italy we
have found through School Education Gateway.

How did the participating organisations contribute to the project? What experiences and
competencies did they bring to the project?

The participating organisations were helping us in every way. Školesusarađivale I

natajnačinrazvijaleprijateljstvo, učile I koristilenoveinovativnemetode. Koristilesu I IKT u
različitimprojektnimaktivnostima.Učesnicisustekli nova znanja o inovativnimmetodamapoputHeiny,
Sfumato ….

How did the participating organisations communicate and coordinate?

Komunikacija de odvijala:
 Email
 eTwinning
 Skype
 Webinar
 Viber
A koordinacija se obavljalaprekokordinatoratimova.

How did you choose the hosting organisations?

We started looking for organisations that were similar to our own in several ways, specially according to
our own teaching and learning strategies. Specially according to our own teaching and learning
strategies. We are a school with a strong emphasis on the use of technology at all levels. We wanted to
visit schools in Czech Republic and we started of searching for schools in Czech Republic. We use
Etwinning and wrote to Alena in Ostrava. They were also very open to receive us.

5. Project Management
How did the participating organisations manage practical and logistical matters (e.g. travel,
accommodation, insurance, safety and protection of participants, visa, work permit, social
security, mentoring and support, preparatory meetings with partners etc.)?

Nakonodabirapartnerskeškolepristupilismoaktivnostimavezanimzarealizacijuorganizacionihpitanja.Ugovor
en je skajpsastanaksakoordinatoromškoleizČeške. Na tom sastankusudogovorenepojedinostikoje se
odnosenaputovanje, smeštaj, ….

How were quality and management issues (e.g. setting up of agreements with partners, learning
agreements with participants, etc.) addressed and by whom?

Regulisano je putemugovoraizmeđuorganizacijaučesnika, potpisanih I overenihsaobestrane.

How did you assess the extent to which your project has been produced the anticipated results
and reached its objectives?

Na osnovuprimenljivosti unastavi, poboljšanesukompetencijenastavnika, jezičkekompetencije, digitalne I

IT.
Please describe any problems or difficulties you encountered during the project and the solutions
applied.

Otkazan je kursu Venecijizbognedovoljnogbrojaprijavljenihučesnika.Pristupilo se

pronalaskunovogsasličnomtemom. Pronađen je novikurs u Italiji u Bolonji.

How were monitoring and/or the support of participants carried out during the activities?

What were the most relevant topics addressed by your project?(multiple selection possible)

In case the topics chosen are different from the ones in the application, please explain why.

5.1. Preparation of Participants

What kind of preparation was offered to the participants (e.g. task-related, intercultural, risk prevention
etc.)? Who provided such preparatory activities? How did you assess the level of usefulness of such
preparatory activities? (Note: For linguistic preparation, please provide information in the next section).
Prezentacija projekta mobilnosti pred Nastavničkim većem naše škole. Odabir kandidata za učestvovanje
u projektu. Sastanak svih izabranih članova na projektu. Sastanak svih članova mobilnosti i predstavnika
partenrske škole iz Češke putem skype sastanka. Izrada programa mobilnosti. Jezička priprema članova
mobilnosti u školi stranih jezika BBC. Prezentacija nastavnika istorije o Istoriji Češke i o kurturološkim
odlikama Češke. Izrada plana putovanja i boravka u Češkoj. Putno osiguranje.

5.2. Linguistic Preparation

Did you use parts of the 'organisational support' grant for the linguistic preparation of participants involved
in the project?

Yes No

7. Participants' Profile
Please describe the background and profile of the participants (age, gender, professional profile, field of
study, etc.) that have been involved in the project and how these participants were selected.

7.4. Participants' Feedback

Please give a summary of the feedback given by your participants, as well as any points for improvement
and problems encountered.

8. Learning Outcomes and Impact

8.1. Learning Outcomes
Please describe, for each activity implemented, which competences (i.e. knowledge, skills and
attitudes/behaviours) were acquired/improved by participants in your project? Were these in line with what
you had planned? If not, please explain.
You can use the results of the participants' reports as a basis for your description.

8.2. Recognition Received by Participants

Activity Type Type of Certification

Job Shadowing Attendance certificate by host institution

 Activity Type Type of Certification

Job Shadowing Europass Mobility Document

Structured Courses/Training Events Course specific certificate

Structured Courses/Training Events Europass Mobility Document

Total

Have all the participants received formal recognition for having taken part in the activities?

Yes No

Please describe, for each activity, the methods used to evaluate and/or assess learning outcomes (e.g.
through reflections, meetings, monitoring of learning outcomes, testing)?

The improvement of the staff training has been monitored in the short term (at the end of the mobility
to assess satisfaction from the mobility experience) in the medium term ( 6-11 months from the start of
the project) and in the long term (at the end of the project), in order to supervise the impact of the
training activities through reports and questionnaires for the recipients. Monitoring was meant to assess
the real impact of the project through the measuring of the results:
• Number and levels of language certificates
• New teaching approaches and digital tools used by the teachers after the training abroad

8.3. Impact
Please describe any impact on the participants, participating organisations, target groups and other
relevant stakeholders (including local, regional, national, European and/or international levels). In
particular, describe the ways in which the project improved the quality of the participating organisations'
regular activities?

FOR TEACHERS
• Experience of different teaching methods ;
• Experience of new subjects;
• Knowledge and understanding of partner countries’ educational system;
• Creation of strong bonds with partner country teachers ;
• Project management skills development ;
• Digital skills development ;
• English language skills development ;
• Social skills development ;
• Motivation for the job ;
FOR THE SCHOOL
• Improvement of school climate ;
• Development of interdisciplinary approaches ;
• Development of openness and cooperation with schools from other countries ;
• Stronger relationships between pupils and teachers ;
• Better teamwork between teaching, administration and management departments
• Better teamwork among teachers ;
• Financial impact ;
• Introduction of new teaching systems, new content ;
• Strengthening of the European dimension and its development ;

To what extent have the participating organisations increased their capacity to co-operate at
European/international level?

9. Dissemination of Project Results

Which results of your project would you like to share? Please provide concrete examples.

Please describe the activities carried out to share the results of your project inside and outside
participating organisations. What were the target groups of your dissemination activities?

• Local newspaper articles

• School Web
• TV
• A meeting in our school about the dissemination of the results of the project and K1 Action awareness
for local Schools
• An Erasmus Section created on the School Website containing all the details of each mobility
( programmes, preliminary activities, narrative recipients’ reports ,press review, monitoring, action
products downloads from the website).
• E-Twinning Erasmus +KA1 mobility group (with posts about the courses inviting colleagues to visit the
Erasmus + Section created on our School website).
• Visibility on social networks;
• Reaction of end users, other stakeholders, peers and decision-makers e.g. using satisfaction
questionnaires;
• Number of event attendees (attendance sheet as proof of this information);

Please explain how the participants have shared their experience with peers inside or outside
your organisation.

Please describe for each activity type the nature of the costs incurred.
10.6. Exceptional Costs

Activity Type No. of Participants

Total

Please describe for each activity type the nature of the costs incurred.

10.3. Individual Support

Activity Type Flow No. Country of Destination Participants (Excluding Accompanying Persons)
Accompanying Persons Total Amount
Funded Duration per Participant (days) No. of Participants (excluding accompanying persons)
Amount per Participant Funded Duration per Accompanying Person (days) No. Of
Accompanying Persons Amount per Accompanying Person
Job Shadowing 1 Czech Republic 7 7 980.00 0 0 0.00 6,860.00
Structured Courses/Training Events 1 Italy 7 1 980.00 0 0 0.00
980.00
Total 7,840.00
10.4. Course Fees
Activity Type Funded Duration (days) Number of Participants Amount per Participant per Day Total
Amount
Structured Courses/Training Events 5 1 70.00 350.00
Total 1 Total 350.00
10.5. Special Needs Support
Activity Type No. of Participants With Special Needs Total Amount
Total 0.00