Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Chapter -1 ......................................................................................................................................................................2
1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................2
1.2 Working Capital .......................................................................................................................................................2
1.3 Why Working Capital Management ........................................................................................................................3
1.4 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................................3
1.4.1 Specific objectives.................................................................................................................................................3
1.5 Methodology ...........................................................................................................................................................4
1.5.1Data Sources ..........................................................................................................................................................4
1.5.2 Data Analysis.........................................................................................................................................................4
1.6 Literature Review.....................................................................................................................................................5
Chapter -2 ....................................................................................................................................................................7
2.1 Company Overview:.................................................................................................................................................7
2.2 Type of Company .....................................................................................................................................................7
2.3 Capital Structure of the Organization ......................................................................................................................8
2.5 Product and Services ...............................................................................................................................................9
2.5.1 Market of the products: .....................................................................................................................................10
2.6 Mission and Values ................................................................................................................................................10
2.6.1 Mission................................................................................................................................................................10
2.6.2 Values .................................................................................................................................................................10
2.7 Business Performance ...........................................................................................................................................10
2.7.1 Reason of fluctuation..........................................................................................................................................11
Chapter -3 ............................................................................................................................................................ 13
3.1 Working Capital Policy ...........................................................................................................................................13
3.1 Working Capital Policy in Basundhara Papers .......................................................................................................14
3.1.1 Inventory Management ......................................................................................................................................15
3.1.2 Accounts Receivables in Days .............................................................................................................................16
3.1.3 Account Payable Period ......................................................................................................................................17
3.1.4 Cash Conversion Cycle ........................................................................................................................................18
3.1.5 Cash Management ..............................................................................................................................................19
3.1.6 Profitability .........................................................................................................................................................20
Chapter-4 ............................................................................................................................................................. 22
4.1 Empirical Analysis of Time Series ...........................................................................................................................22
4.2 Findings ..................................................................................................................................................................22
Chapter -5 ............................................................................................................................................................ 25
5.1 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................................25
References ........................................................................................................................................................... 26
Chapter -1
1.1 Introduction
Proper management of working capital is essential to a company’s fundamental financial
health and operational success as a business. A hallmark of good business management is the
ability to utilize working capital management to maintain a solid balance between growth,
profitability and liquidity. Working capital serves as a metric for how efficiently a company is
operating and how financially stables it is in the short term. Working Capital Management has
its effect on liquidity as well on profitability of the firm. In this research, we have selected
Bashundhara Paper Mills limited (BPML) to be listed in Dhaka Stock Exchange for a period of 5
years from 2011-2015, we have studied the effect of different variables of working capital
management including the Average collection period, Inventory turnover in days, Average
payment period, Cash conversion cycle and Current ratio on the Net operating profitability of
BPML. Debt ratio, size of the firm (measured in terms of natural logarithm of sales) and
financial assets to total assets ratio have been used as control variables.
1.4 Objectives
This research is focusing on working capital management and its effects on profitability
for a sample of Bangladeshi firms.
1.5.1Data Sources
The data used in this study was acquired from the annual report of the BPML for 2011-
2015, Internet and different firms. The data of BPML for the most recent SIX years formed the
basis of our calculations. The period covered by the study extends six years starting from 2011 to
2015. The reason for restricting to this period was that the leatest data for investigation was
available for this period.
(Eljelly, 2004) elucidated that efficient liquidity management involves planning and
controlling current assets and current liabilities in such a manner that eliminates the risk of
inability to meet due short-term obligations and avoids excessive investment in these assets. The
relation between profitability and liquidity was examined, as measured by current ratio and cash
gap (cash conversion cycle) on a sample of joint stock companies in Saudi Arabia using
correlation and regression analysis. The study found that the cash conversion cycle was of more
importance as a measure of liquidity than the current ratio that affects profitability. The size
variable was found to have significant effect on profitability at the industry level. The results
were stable and had important implications for liquidity management in various Saudi
companies. First, it was clear that there was a negative relationship between profitability and
liquidity indicators such as current ratio and cash gap in the Saudi sample examined. Second, the
study also revealed that there was great variation among industries with respect to the significant
measure of liquidity.
(Deloof, 2003) discussed that most firms had a large amount of cash invested in working
capital. It can therefore be expected that the way in which working capital is managed will have
a significant impact on profitability of those firms. Using correlation and regression tests he
found a significant negative relationship between gross operating income and the number of days
accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable of Belgian firms. On basis of these results
he suggested that managers could create value for their shareholders by reducing the number of
days’ accounts receivable and inventories to a reasonable minimum. The negative relationship
between accounts payable and profitability is consistent with the view that less profitable firms
wait longer to pay their bills.
(Ghosh and Maji, 2003) in this paper made an attempt to examine the efficiency of
working capital management of the Indian cement companies during 1992 – 1993 to 2001 –
2002. For measuring the efficiency of working capital management, performance, utilization,
and overall efficiency indices were calculated instead of using some common working capital
management ratios. Setting industry norms as target-efficiency levels of the individual firms, this
paper also tested the speed of achieving that target level of efficiency by an individual firm
during the period of study. Findings of the study indicated that the Indian Cement Industry as a
whole did not perform remarkably well during this period.
(Shin and Soenen, 1998) highlighted that efficient Working Capital Management (WCM)
was very important for creating value for the shareholders. The way working capital was
managed had a significant impact on both profitability and liquidity. The relationship between
the length of Net Trading Cycle, corporate profitability and risk adjusted stock return was
examined using correlation and regression analysis, by industry and capital intensity. They found
a strong negative relationship between lengths of the firm’s nettrading Cycle and its profitability.
In addition, shorter net trade cycles were associated with higher risk adjusted stock returns.
(Smith and Begemann 1997) emphasized that those who promoted working capital theory
shared that profitability and liquidity comprised the salient goals of working capital
management. The problem arose because the maximization of the firm's returns could seriously
threaten its liquidity, and the pursuit of liquidity had a tendency to dilute returns. This article
evaluated the association between traditional and alternative working capital measures and return
on investment (ROI), specifically in industrial firms listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
(JSE). The problem under investigation was to establish whether the more recently developed
alternative working capital concepts showed improved association with return on investment to
that of traditional working capital ratios or not. Results indicated that there were no significant
differences amongst the years with respect to the independent variables. The results of their
stepwise regression corroborated that total current liabilities divided by funds flow accounted for
most of the variability in Return on Investment (ROI). The statistical test results showed that a
traditional working capital leverage ratio, current liabilities divided by funds flow, displayed the
greatest associations with return on investment. Wellknown liquidity concepts such as the
current and quick ratios registered insignificant associations whilst only one of the newer
working capital concepts, the comprehensive liquidity index, indicated significant associations
with return on investment.
All the above studies provide us a solid base and give us idea regarding working capital
management and its components. They also give us the results and conclusions of those
researches already conducted on the same area for different countries and environment from
different aspects. On basis of these researches done in different countries, we have developed our
own methodology for research.
Chapter -2
""পপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপ
পপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপ,
পপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপপ""
2.6.2 Values
Our Values form the acronym SPIRIT and it is the SPIRIT in which we operate. The word
SPIRIT stands for SOUL, ESSENCE, LIFE, and ATTITUDE. This is the Spirit that nourishes
the SOUL of the people of ‘Bashundhara Paper’; it is the ATTITUDE and the ESSENCE that
gives LIFE to our winning culture.
Other Income:
There was no significant fluctuation in the other income during the last five years except in the
year 2014. In that year other income increased due to interest receipts from investment of FDR.
Total Income:
Fluctuation in the total income is the result of changes in the revenue and other income as
narrated above.
Other Expenses:
Other expense is consistent over the last five years. However it may change due to increase/
decrease in salary of manpower, some accidental losses, increase in promotional activities etc.
Changes of Inventory:
There is no significant change in inventory over the last five years. Some seasonal aspects
inventory need to maintain substantial amount. Political unrest in 2013 and 2014 is also hamper
the production as a result inventory at that time was higher at the end of the said years.
Net profit before & after Tax and Earning per Share (EPS):
The Company has consistent growth of net profit before tax but due to recalculation of deferred
tax expense net profit after tax fluctuate during the last five years. Earnings per share (EPS) have
been fluctuating due to increase in share capital in the year 2014 and 2015.
Chapter -3
3.1 Working Capital Policy
In simple terms working capital can be defined as current assets minus current liabilities.
The future existence of a company is threatened when it is unable to manage its current liabilities
through its current assets. It is proved to be important for a firm to ensure that excess cash are
invested in short term securities to enhance the wealth of the shareholders. Working
capital policy can be mainly classified in three categories- defensive policy, aggressive policy
and conservative policy.
If the firm canaccurately forecast its array of sales, inventory procuring time, inventory
usage rates, volume and pattern of production, production cycle, split between cash sales and
credit sales, collection period and other factors which impinge on working capital components,
the investment in current assets can be defined uniquely.
If the firm adopts a moderate policy, it would carry a moderate level of current assets in
relation to sales. Additionally, if the firm follows a highly aggressive policy, it would
carry a low level of current assets in relation to sales.
A conservative current asset policy tends to reduce risk. The surplus from current assets
under this policy enable the firm to cope rather easily with variations in sales,
production plans, and procurement time. Further, the higher liquidity associated with this
policy diminishes the chances of technical insolvency. The reduction of risk, however, is also
accompanied by lower expected profitability.
The aggressive working capital policy is company’s intention to fund its working capital
through short term debt. This policy is thought to be cheap because funds such as overdraft can
be called upon when needed and the interest will be paid only when an overdraft is taken unlike
long-term debt where interest has to be paid for the entire loaned amount for the year.
3.1 Working Capital Policy in Basundhara Papers
On the basis of previous discussion it can be referred that Basundhara follows an
aggressive working capital policy. The company finances majority of their working capital
through short term debts. In an aggressive working capital policy the majority amount of
current assets are financed by short-term debt. This policy will push the finance
department to be proactive in the management of working capital always, as they need
to sell inventory stocks fast and collect receivables on a timely manner to settle the short
term debts on time. As the company has a higher growth rate, anaggressive working
capital policy suits them. As mentioned, if a firm follows a highly aggressive policy, it
would maintain a lower level of current assets in relation to sales. Let’s have look
towards the current asset situation in terms of sales ofBasundhara Papers. From the below graph
it is clear that the amount of current asset is lower than the amount of sales of the company
except in 2016 where sales has significantly dropped below the current assets.
12,000.00
10,000.00
8,000.00
6,000.00
4,000.00
2,000.00
0.00
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Afza and Nazr (2007) has explained a scientific way of determining the working capital policy of
a firm, according to them aggressive financing policy supports the utilization of high levels of
current liabilities versus long-term liabilities. They have used following formula in determining
the financing policy of a firm,
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑃𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑦 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
The following graph is representing the financing policy of the Basundhara Paper, it suggests
that the firm has actively been managing to finance more than 50% of its total assets through
current liabilities only. It clearly explains the firm is following an aggressive working capital
management policy.
Financing Policy
0.7000
0.6000 0.5892
0.5771
0.5520 0.5479
0.5000 0.4977
0.4733
0.4000
0.3000
0.2000
0.1000
0.0000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
400
300
200
100
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
From the chart it is clearly visible the firm has been managing an inventory for around 150 days
in 2011 which has gradually been increasing, it is suggesting that the company has been
adjusting supply risk by increasing the amount of inventory. But in 2016 the inventory plan has
become ineffective although the reason is a sharp drop in the sales which is an operational issue
of the firm.
100
80
60
40
20
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
The chart is implying that Basundhara papers collects its account receivables in 70 days
approximately. If the collection time is efficient then it would be less than the accounts payables
in days, also it is important that we compare the outcomes with the industry practice. Compared
to the inventory the ratio is one third of the stock selling period which is quite efficient. Figure 5
is clearly showing that the accounts payable period is lengthier than the account receivables
collection period.
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
The chart is showing a similar trend like the accounts receivables, as the accounts
receivables increased so the accounts payable increased. We can see an average of 80 days is
required by Basundhara papers to pay its suppliers payment which is greater than the accounts
receivables period and should help the firm in managing its working capital.
Cash conversion cycle mainly helps to figure out how cash is moving throughout the
company in terms of duration. When CCC cuts that means the company has more cash for other
usages such as investing on equipment or innovating manufacturing and selling process. On the
other hand, when CCC lengthens, cash tied up in firm's operation activities where there is little
chance for other investment.
CCC
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
The graph is showing that the firm has been managing its cash conversion cycle within
150 to 200 days which has drastically increased in the year 2016. It can be said that in 2016
something has happened that has affected all the operational performance of the firm. The cash
converting period of the firm could be managed more efficiently.
1.7596
1.3914
1.2559 1.1820 1.2248 1.2495
2.0000
1.5000
0.9975 1.0149 1.0155 1.0004
0.8912
1.0000 0.5074 0.8556
0.4861 0.5264 0.4728 0.4313 0.4520
0.0170 0.0356 0.0155 0.0282 0.0178 0.0215 Interest Coverage
Cash Ratio
0.5000
Quick Ratio
Current Ratio
0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6
On top that, the chart is revealing that the company holds a cash balance of 2% average
which could be consider appropriate given the firm is selling papers in the national market. And
the interest coverage ratio is suggesting the firm has been actively managing its capital structure
and successfully reduced its debt ratio, as the firm has been improving its ability of paying
interest which is a positive sign for the firm.
Overall, Basundhara paper has been managing its liquidity by forecasting the current
assets requirement in the near future. The cash management policy of the firm has a positive
impact on its performance but the analysis is showing the firm is keeping a higher amount of
inventory which can be managed to make the operations more efficient.
3.1.6 Profitability
Every activities of a business organization are aimed to increase the profitability of the firm, if
the profitability increases the value of the firm increases, therefore the price of the shares
increase which is the ultimate goals of the managers. In short, profitability of the organization is
of utmost importance.
Year Gross Margin Net Margin Operating Margin EPS ROE ROA
2011 17.30% 1.15% 12.55% 5.47 3.84% 0.75%
2012 15.97% 0.64% 11.35% 3.41 2.68% 0.44%
2013 16.30% 0.92% 12.14% 5.10 3.85% 0.59%
2014 17.32% 2.11% 12.98% 4.40 7.95% 1.28%
2015 17.27% 2.54% 13.24% 1.79 6.28% 1.46%
2016 18.08% 5.56% 14.58% 2.14 7.03% 1.67%
The table is representing information of the profitability performance of Basundhara
group for the last 6 years. Overall, the firm has been performing better with the time as the firm
successfully increased its gross margin from 16% to 18%, the net margin rose from 1% to
5.56%, and the operating margin increased from 12% to 14%. The ratios are suggesting the firm
has been managing its administrative expenses, financing expenses which has increased the net
margin by 4% while gross margin and operating margin had increased by 2% only.
Unfortunately the return to the shareholders has been going down, the EPS record is
clearly exhibiting a decline in the earning per share which is not expected by the shareholders of
the firm. While the firm had a declining EPS its return on equity has been increasing for the last
six years from 3% to 7%. Similarly, the overall return on invested assets has been increasing
over the last six years. In short it can be said, the working capital management policy of the firm
should have a positive impact on the firm.
Basundhara papers mills limited implemented an aggressive working capital policy which can be
risky for the firm. Although the policy is risky but it has improved the profitability of the firm
gradually. Moreover, the firm is actively managing working capital to avoid the risks arise from
inefficient management of working capital. To avoid the bankruptcy threat the firm has been
keeping a healthy liquid balance. Overall, the working capital management policy of the firm
shows a positive impact on the performance of the firm.
Chapter-4
4.1 Empirical Analysis of Time Series
The model will be implemented to measure the impact of different variables related
working capital management on the positive performance of the firm. It is assumed that the firm
performance can be estimated by the progress of ROA, ROE, and EPS, which suggests a linear
relationship between the working capital managing variables and firm performance exist. The
model is developed using the most important issues in working capital management where the
independent variable would be the ROA of the firm, and dependent variables that should have
impact on the performance of the firm are collection period, payment period, days inventory,
cash conversion cycle. If we show this relation in equation then it would be,
𝑅𝑂𝐴 = 𝐶 + 𝑋1 𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 + 𝑋2 𝑃𝑎𝑦𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 + 𝑋3 𝐷𝑎𝑦𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 + 𝑋4 𝐶𝐶𝐶
4.2 Findings
Output of the regression analysis is presented in the following table
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.9664
R Square 0.9339
Adjusted R
Square 0.3347
Standard
Error 0.0021
Observations 6
ANOVA
Significan
df SS MS F ce F
Regression 4 0.0001 0.0000 9.4151 0.2392
Residual 2 0.0000 0.0000
Total 6 0.0001
Coefficie Standar Lower Upper Lower Upper
nts d Error t Stat P-value 95% 95% 95.0% 95.0%
Intercept 0.0206 0.0073 2.8075 0.1069 -0.0109 0.0521 -0.0109 0.0521
Collection
Period -0.0026 0.0026 -1.0102 0.4188 -0.0138 0.0086 -0.0138 0.0086
Payment
Period 0.0019 0.0022 0.8373 0.4905 -0.0077 0.0114 -0.0077 0.0114
Days
Inventory 0.0001 0.0000 2.1667 0.1626 -0.0001 0.0003 -0.0001 0.0003
CCC 0.0000 0.0000 65535 #NUM! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
From the output of regression analysis it can be found that the firm has an intercept on its ROA
at 2.06% in other words the working capital management do not have any impact on the first
2.06% return on assets of the firm. The collection period has a negative impact on the ROA of
the firm by .26% while the payment period is positively related with the ROA of the firm. The
impact of the payment period is .19% which is quite significant for the profitability on the firm.
As the model is saying the cash conversion cycle do not have any individual impact on the firm’s
performance as the CCC is calculated using other three variables of the regression equation. So
the profitability equation of Basudhara papers would be
The Model Summary table provides several measures of how well the model fits the data. R
(which can range from 0 to 1) is the correlation between the dependent measure and the
combination of the independent variable(s), so the closer R is to 1, the better the fit. In this
example, we have an R of 0.9664, which is a good score. This is the correlation between the
dependent variable and the combination of the four independent variables used in this study. R
can also be considered as the correlation between the dependent variable and the predicted
values.
In short, it is empirically proved that the working capital management of a firm has quantitative
impact on the profitability of the firm. For Basundhara Papers mills limited the impact of these
variables seems very low although it is not a reliable output. To have a reliable output an analysis
on a larger sample is required.
Chapter -5
5.1 Conclusion
One of the best ways to judge a company's cash flow health is to take a deep look on its working
capital management. The better a company can manage its working capital the lower company's
need of borrowing.
Working capital management policy of Basundhara papers seem to be effective. There is the
availability of internal source of funds due to satisfactory amount of collection period during the
period of payment. The firm faces no complications in management of inventory, debtors, cash
balances and current liabilities. The liquidity position of the company is also satisfactory due to
good turnover of current assets, inventory debtors and cash balances. The company enjoys good
facility of cash credit and other working capital loan though the borrowing amount of the
company is substantial. The firm should face no difficulties in repayment of its current liabilities
out of the operating profit.
Regardless a drop in the EPS the firm was able to generate a better ROA which is really very
promising for the firm. The firm has been using the amount to repay its debt to reduce the
reliability on debt which has negatively affected the EPS. Along with the debt reduction policy if
the firm choose to manage its inventory actively then the operational performance of the firm
will increase. Finally it can be concluded that the working capital management of Basundhara
papers is satisfactory but not efficient, if the firm make its working capital policy efficient it
would become more profitable as the WCM policy has substantial impact on the performance of
a firm.
References
Afza, T. and M.S. Nazir, 2007. Working capital management policies of firms: Empirical
evidence from Pakistan. Presented at 9th South Asian Management Forum (SAMF) on February
24-25, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.