Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Discussion
Mission: provide essential communications for Our Community
Hospital in the event of failure of the public switched telephone system.
Examples of events that might lead to such a failure include excavation breaching Bell
system cables, in-house failure of the telephone controller, electrical supply problems,
windstorm damage to telephone system essential infrastructure (ref 1998 Deroche
event in central Unnamed State), or other dislocation.
Mission Descriptors
A. Independent of Bell System
B. User Friendly (does not add to employee workload) (does not distract
employee from duties) (does not require staff to master the use of new
equipment)
C. Reliable (will batteries last throughout the duration of a communications
failure?) (will the devices communicate with those we need to reach? E.g.
physicians, other hospitals, dispatch?) (do the personnel who will be using the
devices, know how to do so effectively under conditions of high channel loading,
e.g., when everybody tries to speak at once?)
D. Robust. (are these devices resistant to being rendered unusable-e.g.
by inadvertent channel changes, volume changes, or other parameter changes
by personnel unfamiliar with the device?)
E. Readily available/readily recharged power source
F. Secure. (ref patient transfer information)
FRS Radios
PRO:
Instruments in house presently, in use presently. Powered by
commonly available batteries. Use not complicated. Reliable. Bell
independent.
CON:
Presence of GMRS frequencies (which are on these radios)
mandates GMRS licensure for legal operation, per FCC regulations.
(GMRS licensure is _not_ available for institutions). Keyboards not locked, leading to
degraded robustness of system dependent upon them. Unsecure communications.
Runners
PRO:
Low tech. Secure. Bell Independent. Robust. User friendly. No power supply issues.
CON:
Where will these personnel come from? How will they be vetted ref HIPPA
compliance? If they do not materialize, very greatly decreased robustness, user
friendliness.
MURS (Multiple Use Radio Service: Unlicensed VHF 2 watt radio service)
PRO:
License free service (no legal issues). Bell independent. Robust (few user adjustable
controls on radio). User friendly (users capable of manipulating FRS radios ought to
find MURS radios to be no challenge). Battery powered, alkaline battery power option
likely available. Reliable at in-house ranges. Mildly secure (small numbers of MURS
radios in circulation)
CON:
Cost approx $60-$200 per instrument. Batteries require maintenance. Access to radios
may be problematic (where stored? How accessed? Who has key?)
Amateur Radio
PRO:
Equipment generally supplied by the Amateurs. Robust, reliable (the Hams typically
know their radios well, and are generally capable of minor level trouble shooting). User
friendly (Hams manipulate radios, leaving staff to patient care duties). Training
infrastructure is in place presently (Hams trained as any other volunteer) Bell
independent. Mildly secure. Powered by Ham supplied batteries.
CON:
Finding/training/organizing suitable numbers of volunteers who are Hams, or will obtain
licensure may be an issue. Drills required to integrate these personnel into the
response plans of the hospital. HIPPA (etc) training required. How do we call up the
Hams, in time of need?
MISSION 2:
COMMUNICATION WITH UNAMED COUNTY CENTRAL DISPATCH
FRS/MURS
Unsuitable for communication with central due to range (1-2 miles) and lack of
interoperability options.
Amateur Radio
PRO:
Potentially capable of communication with Central (proven capability of communication
with Neighboring Town Amateur repeaters, which themselves are capable of
communicating with Central). Modest Our Community Hospital cost (perhaps defrayed
by grants from community—Major Employer #1, Major Employer #2, Major Employer
#3, Rotary, unnamed Community Foundation, or from DHS or Unnamed State State
Police-Emergency Management). Bell independent. Reliable (to be proven). User
Friendly (Hams operate radios, staff does nursing, etc. Limited task distraction).
Robust. Powered by Our Hospital generator or 12 volt battery.
CON:
Cost of training volunteers (HIPPAA, etc). Only mildly secure. Must have antenna/feed
line in place, prior to need, for maximum reliability and effectiveness. Drills required in
order for Hams and staff to understand how to work together. One question yet to be
answered is how Central will achieve Ham capability. How will we call up Hams?
*communication past the ridgeline at Westerly Town may be a problem,
particularly in the event of failure of the Neighboring Town Ham repeaters
*Memorandum of Understanding with the repeater owner(s) is important
for smooth operations in the event of an emergency.
FRS/MURS
Unsuitable for communication with central due to range (1-2 miles) and lack of
interoperability options.
Amateur Radio
PRO:
Potentially capable of communication across the state on shortwave frequencies.
Modest Our Community Hospital cost (antenna and feed line) (perhaps defrayed by
grants from community or DHS/ State Police Emergency Management). Bell
independent. Reliable (to be proven). User Friendly (Hams operate radios, staff does
nursing, etc. Limited task distraction). Robust. Powered by Our Community Hospital
generator or 12 volt battery.
Amateur Radio
CON:
Do any Hams, volunteering to assist, have shortwave equipment? Can Anonymous
Referral Center/Unnamed Southerly City hospitals communicate on shortwaves?
Cost of training volunteers (HIPPAA, etc). Only mildly secure. Must have antenna/feed
line in place, prior to need, for maximum reliability and effectiveness. Drills required in
order for Hams and staff to understand how to work together. How will we call up
Hams?