See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/282700875

Qualitative research proposal: A model to help novice researchers

Article  in  Index de Enfermeria · January 2011

CITATIONS READS

0 2,211

3 authors:

Cristina García Vivar Ana Canga Armayor

Universidad de Navarra Universidad de Navarra
56 PUBLICATIONS   396 CITATIONS    43 PUBLICATIONS   115 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Navidad Canga
Universidad de Navarra
33 PUBLICATIONS   264 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Familia y dependencia View project

Universidad Saludable View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Ana Canga Armayor on 12 November 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 !" ##

ISSN: 1699-5988

Números publicados Búsqueda documentos

QUALITATIVE
METHODOLOGY
Qualitative Research Proposal: a model to help
novice researchers

Cristina G. Vivar,1 Ana Canga Armayor,1 Navidad Canga

Armayor 1
1Escuela de Enfermería, Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona, Navarra,
España

Mail delivery: Dra. Cristina G. Vivar. Escuela de Enfermería, Universidad de

Navarra. C/ Irunlarrea 1. Pamplona, 31008, Navarra, España

Manuscript received by 5.3.2010

Manuscrito accepted by 6.7.2010

Index de Enfermería [Index Enferm] 2011; 20(1-2): 91-95

How to cite this document

Vivar, Cristina G.; Canga Armayor, Ana; Canga Armayor, Navidad. Qualitative Research Proposal: a
model to help novice researchers. Index de Enfermería [Index Enferm] (digital edition) 2011; 20(1-2).
In <http://www.index-f.com/index-enfermeria/v20n1-2/7340e.php> Consulted by
20 de Septiembre de 2011

Abstract

Nurses make an important contribution to extending and updating knowledge through research
with the purpose of improving the quality of nursing care. Students and novice researchers,
however, may find it difficult to initiate investigation and may require supervision during the
research process. This paper focuses on the practicality of designing a qualitative research
proposal by presenting an example/model, in the hope that it may be of benefit to beginners
using a qualitative methodology.
Key-words: Qualitative Research/ Research Proposal/ Example/model.

Introduction

In Spain, the restructuring of nursing education, within the European Space of Higher Education
framework, has established the academic status of Degree, Master, and PhD for all graduate
qualifications, including nursing. This has been vital in promoting the profession1 and crucial in
responding to the reforming health care system. An important initiative to enhance the quality of
nursing care has been the fostering of nursing research so as to develop evidence-based practice.2-5
The development of nursing research capability is now a reality in many Schools of Nursing in
Spain. However, nursing research in the Spanish context requires further improvement. Specific
capacity strategies identified in the literature include the creation of infrastructure, the promotion of

' ( &&)))* +!,* -.& +! , /. / & $% !$& 01% *('( $%&% &$%
 !" ## $

research culture, and the facilitation of training and collaboration.6 This may be achievable through the
integration of nursing research networks and the improvement of teaching in nursing research. While
these suggestions are key to the creation, extension and updating of nursing knowledge so as to
improve nursing care in Spain, getting started in research, especially in qualitative research that has
received less attention in nursing research,7 may be a challenge for students and novice researchers.
"How to start qualitative
research"? The first step in the
research process is the development
of an outstanding project.8,9 A
proposal is required for several
purposes, such as for grant
applications, academic degrees
(MSc, PhD), conferences or
seminars, or ethical approval as part
of a research project.10,11 In order to
help research novices, an article on
the theoretical bases of designing a
qualitative research proposal in
nursing and health care has been
published elsewhere.12 Vivar et al.12
presented a 17-step process to
describe the development of a
qualitative research project. The
steps are: (1) selecting an
interesting topic; (2) introducing the
background to the problem; (3)
presenting the significance of the
study; (4) defining the concepts; (5)
establishing the research aim(s); (6)
deciding on the research paradigm;
(7) finding a theoretical framework;
(8) choosing the data collection
method; (9) planning the data
collection; (10) describing the
procedure of data analysis; (11)
enhancing the quality of the data;
(12) reporting the ethical issues; (13)
presenting the limitations of the
study; (14) disseminating the findings; (15) planning the time frame; (16) concluding; (17) presenting
the references [See Table 1].
On the basis of the theoretical guidelines designed by Vivar et al.12 to develop a qualitative research
proposal by using a 17-step process, the present article focuses on the practicality of designing a
research proposal, in the hope that it may be of benefit to researchers new to a qualitative
methodology. According to Bandura's Social Learning Theory,13 people may learn by observing and
imitating the behaviours of others. While Bandura's theory was initially applied to the understanding of
behaviour modification, his theory was later applied to the technique of behaviour modelling that has
been widely used in training and education programmes. Modelling is also observed as a novice
passes through Benner's five levels of proficiency to become an expert.14 To some extent, a similar
way of learning can be adopted by novice researchers who may model themselves on more
experienced researchers, drawing on their expertise and publications in the field. This paper aims to
present an illustration of a qualitative research proposal in nursing so as to be instructive and helpful
for novices. The intention is not to be "the definitive example" but "simply one example" of a qualitative
research project.

Development of a Qualitative Research Proposal

The following sections examine the sequence of steps involved in developing a qualitative research
proposal. The example presented is an abbreviated and modified version of a dissertation entitled
Perceived needs of young and older long-term survivors of breast cancer,15 which set out to
understand the impact of breast cancer on long-term survival. The references used in this research
proposal are presented in Table 2.
Step 1. Selecting the topic. The interest in cancer patients began when the author of the original

' ( &&)))* +!,* -.& +! , /. / & $% !$& 01% *('( $%&% &$%
 !" ## 0

proposal worked in an oncology unit. In addition to giving physical care to cancer patients, she became
aware of the importance of providing supportive care to the patients and their family members. Her
curiosity regarding breast cancer survivors, however, grew when, together with some colleagues, she
conducted a literature review about the quality of life of women surviving breast cancer and realised
that cancer survival was a relatively recent area of nursing that needed further exploration.
Step 2. Background of the problem. A growing number of authors have become aware of issues in
the long-term survival of breast cancer, a stage in the cancer trajectory identified by Mullan1 as "a
permanent season of survival". However, little empirical research has been carried out on the
supportive needs of young and older long-term survivors of breast cancer. A literature review discloses
that though long-term breast cancer survivors may be disease-free, this does not mean they are "need-
free".2 Many breast cancer survivors expressed continued menopausal symptoms and other physical
effects as a result of treatment;3 problems related to body image,4 sexuality, and fertility;5 concerns
relating to employment and health insurance coverage;6 changes in family life;7 and ongoing concern
about cancer recurrence.8 This increasing number of long-term breast cancer survivors in developed
countries9,10 should also be noted. Future study is required to investigate the unmet needs of long-term
survivors of breast cancer, and to explore the kind of support women would like to receive from
oncology teams.2
Step 3. Significance of the study. Understanding the impact of breast cancer on long-term survival is
crucial to enable health and social professionals strengthen strategies to enhance the quality of life of
women surviving breast cancer. No previous study has attempted to explore the personal experience
of young and older long-term breast cancer survivors using a qualitative approach.2 However only
through a study of this sort can a holistic picture of the age-related needs of cancer survivors be
understood and initiatives taken to address unmet needs.
Step 4. Definition of concepts. Young and older survivors of breast cancer:Young survivors are
women who are forty-four years or younger, and older survivors are women who are forty-five years or
older.2
Long-term survivor of breast cancer: This refers to people who have lived at least five years after
their diagnosis of cancer and are disease-free.
Supportive needs: These include the informational, physical, spiritual, psychological, and social
needs of long-term survivors of breast cancer.11
Step 5. Research aims. The aims of this cross-sectional descriptive study are:
1.To identify the supportive needs of both young and older long-term female survivors of breast
cancer; and
2.To explore women's perceptions concerning the support they receive from healthcare
professionals in relation to managing long-term sequelae of breast cancer during survival.
Step 6. Research paradigm. Qualitative research will be chosen in this study because it is often
used when little is known about a phenomenon,12 and theories are not available.13 A qualitative
approach would facilitate documentation and description of the scarce information, currently available
on the supportive needs of long-term breast cancer survivors. Besides, qualitative research, capturing
the individual aspects of the human experience in their entirety,14 appears advisable in the endeavour
to achieve a holistic picture of the lived experience of long-term cancer survivors with regard to their
supportive needs.
Phenomenology aims to produce an exhaustive description of the lived experience of individuals in
relation to a phenomenon,14,15 and may convey what long term survival means to a woman who is
surviving breast cancer. Some authors have suggested that the holistic approach applied in nursing
provides an ideal setting for phenomenological research.16 A holistic approach involves a
multidimensional understanding of health that is related to a state of physical, psychological, social and
spiritual well being.17 In the study of lived experience, this holistic approach provides the foundation for
phenomenological research.
Step 7. Theoretical framework. The Supportive Care Framework11 is used to guide this study.
According to this theoretical framework, individuals with cancer experience different needs, over the
course of the disease. These needs change over time and are influenced by many factors, such as
age, gender, socio-economic status, culture, education, religion, coping resources, and social
support.11
For the purpose of this research, though this framework encompasses the complete spectrum of the
cancer experience, attention will be paid only to the supportive needs during survival. The framework
will be used as the basis for an assessment of the informational, physical, spiritual, emotional,
psychological, social, and practical needs of young and older breast cancer survivors during long-term
survival.
Step 8. Method of data collection. Face-to-face interviews will be the main data collection method to
ensure the collection of detailed data which may not be accessed when questionnaires are used.18

' ( &&)))* +!,* -.& +! , /. / & $% !$& 01% *('( $%&% &$%
 !" ## 1

Semi-structured interviews have been chosen for several reasons. Firstly, this method will enable the
researchers to gain subjective and narrative descriptions of the perceived supportive needs of long-
term survivors of breast cancer. Secondly, in semi-structured interviews respondents are asked the
same questions, thus the information can thus be organised around areas of particular interest to
address the research aims. There is also considerable flexibility, allowing respondents to talk and
freely express their feelings and perceptions.19 Finally, the fact that researchers can ask for
clarifications enhances validity.18
Step 9. Collection of data. Stratified purposeful sampling that illustrates subgroups and facilitates
comparisons13 will be used to recruit long-term survivors of breast cancer. This method of sampling
allows phenomenological researchers to choose deliberately who to include in the study on the basis
of predetermined characteristics relevant to the research.20 The findings of this study cannot be
generalised to the whole long-term breast cancer population, as this type of sampling is not
representative of the target population.21 However, this limitation is acceptable as the main goal of this
research is to describe the full nature of the experiences of long-term breast cancer survivors rather
than to develop a precise estimate of what percentage of breast cancer survivors behave or feel in a
certain way. The sample will be selected on the basis of the following criteria:
1.Participants are between five and ten years post-diagnosis. Women who have survived for more
than ten years are excluded from the study because they may have a different perspective of survival,
influenced by the longer time interval involved.
2.There is no documented recurrent disease at the time of the interview.
3.They are between thirty-four and eighty-nine years old. This age interval is selected according to
the sample characteristics outlined in the study by Cimprich and colleagues.22
A major concern is the number of subjects needed in a sample. In a phenomenological study, ten
subjects have been reported as comprising a reasonable size.13 For the purpose of this study, five
young women and five older long-term survivors of breast cancer will be recruited.
Potential participants will be identified through a Spanish self-help group which operates in the city
where the study will be conducted. Because unexpected problems can arise in the course of the study,
two interviews will be piloted with two long-term survivors of breast cancer who frequently participate in
the self-help group. This will confirm whether the women understand the research questions, and will
record their individual impressions of the project. Furthermore, this pilot will show whether the study
design, data collection, and data analysis are appropriate or if they require modifications. It will also
give the researchers opportunity to reflect on their interviewing skills and to be sure the technical
aspects of recording the interviews are satisfactory.
After obtaining consent from the participants, explanation about the purpose of the study and its
development will be individually given to them. The interviews will be held in a room where women
currently meet for the self-help group. It seems to be an appropriate place because the women are
familiar with this environment, and this will encourage them to express their feelings and experience of
survival. Furthermore, the room lends itself to audio-taping, an essential aspect as the interviews will
be recorded if the women give permission.
Semi-structured and face-to-face interviews, expected to take about fifty to eighty minutes, will be
conducted individually with both young and older women. To ensure that women express their
experience of the perceived supportive needs during long-term survival, they will be asked to reflect on
the time period beginning at their five-year anniversary since diagnosis and proceeding to the present.
Tape-recording will increase the accuracy of data collection, as tapes contain the exact words of the
interviews.23 If participants refuse permission to be recorded, the interviewer will ask permission to take
notes during the interview.
The interview will begin with an open question such as, "please can you tell me about your
experience since your five-year anniversary of the diagnosis of breast cancer?" Further questions will
address supportive needs of a long-term survivor and allow women to express their own experiences.
In addition, questions will be asked to explore and clarify the points raised by the women. All interviews
will close by thanking women for their participation and by assuring them of the confidentiality of their
responses. Field notes will be taken after the interviews are concluded to write down all remarks that
may be relevant to the data analysis.
Step 10. Analysis of the data. Prior to analysis, the audio-tapes will be transcribed verbatim and field
notes will also be organised. NUD*IST computer programme will be used to aid in the analysis and
representation of data by storing, organising files and searching for themes, so as to enable quick and
easy access to material.13,24 Bracketing will be used throughout the data analysis with a view to limiting
expectations and presuppositions on the interpretation of data, so that the researchers will remain
neutral in relation to the phenomenon under study.25
Transcriptions of the interviews will be analysed using Colaizzi's method of phenomenological
analysis.26,27 Separate descriptions for young and older long-term survivors will be developed to
identify any differences between the two age groups.
Step 11. Quality of the data. To assess trustworthiness, the criteria of credibility, transferability,

' ( &&)))* +!,* -.& +! , /. / & $% !$& 01% *('( $%&% &$%
 !" ## "

dependability, and confirmability will be used to achieve methodological rigour in this proposal.
Credibility, referring to the authenticity of the data, can be ensured by giving findings to participants to
validate results.13 Women will be requested to have a second meeting after the first interview, once the
initial analysis has been carried out, so that they can confirm the accuracy of the analysis of the
interview. Transferability will be guaranteed by recruiting information from women at different ages.
The different experiences of women will allow a clearer understanding of the phenomenon of survival
and may contribute to a higher quality in the study. Dependability and confirmability will be
strengthened by presenting an in-depth description of how the study progresses, how and what
decisions are made, and any issues that occur during the interviews and over the course of the study.
Step 12: Ethical issues. Prior to initiative the research, ethical approval will be obtained. The issue of
informed consent will be addressed through the provision of information sheets and consent forms to
the women, as well as the communication of verbal information about the aims and development of the
research. The women participating in the study will be provided with a copy of the signed consent form
in order to remind them of the conditions agreed. All the women will be informed that their involvement
is voluntary and they can withdraw from the study at any time.
With regard to confidentiality and anonymity, the researchers acknowledge that the interviews can
reveal intimate information about the women, and that sharing thoughts and emotions about the cancer
experience can be distressing. Every effort will be made to safeguard the privacy and comfort of the
participants. The women's descriptions of their experiences will not be stored with any identifying
labels, and codes will be used to replace names.
A final ethical issue is to discuss what happens to the data after it is collected. The researcher has
an ethical responsibility to report the findings accurately.23 Although every effort will be made to do so,
the interpretation of the data is never wholly objective.18 That is why, as discussed previously, women
will be contacted so that they can validate their own experiences. Another responsibility is that of
ensuring that the data is used appropriately and in the best interests of the studied population.28 Thus,
the proposed research will contribute to our understanding of long-term survival and related supportive
needs among long-term survivors of breast cancer.
Step 13. Limitations of the study. Caution must be taken when drawing firm conclusions from this
research. The fact that the women of this study are interviewed at the time of their participation in the
self-help group may influence
their responses, in that they
may experience more
supportive needs and poor
support from health care
professionals than women who
do not attend self-help groups
during long-term survival.29
Further studies are therefore
needed to address this limitation
and identify participants who do
not belong to a self-help group
at the time of the study.
Generalisation of findings is
limited because of
methodological aspects.
Examples of these are the small
sample size, the use of non-
random sampling techniques,
and the implementation of
cross-sectional design, which
limit the discovery of any
changes in the supportive needs
over the course of long-term
survival. As a result, it may be
suggested that longitudinal
research using a larger number
of participants should be carried
out to identify the needs of long-
term survivors of breast cancer
over a longer period.
Despite theses limitations, the
findings of this study will provide
in depth understanding of the
lived experience of survivorship

' ( &&)))* +!,* -.& +! , /. / & $% !$& 01% *('( $%&% &$%
 !" ##

for both young and older long-term survivors of breast cancer. This will be valuable data as preliminary
work for further studies.
Step 14. Dissemination of the findings. After carrying out this project, the findings will be presented
in nursing academic journals. It is also intended that the results of this research are presented in the
form of a conference paper to benefit the nursing and medical team's understanding of the concerns
and needs experienced when coping with long-term breast cancer survival.
Step 15. Research timetable. This study is to be conducted between January 2008 and January
2010. From January to February 2008 the pilot study will be carried out; from March to November 2008
data collection; from December 2008 to April 2009 the literature review will be conducted; from May to
December 2009 the analysis of data; and finally from January 2009 to January 2010 the report of the
research will be written.
Step 16. Conclusions. As the study progresses, it is anticipated that modifications may be necessary
in order to provide a deep understanding of the experiences of young and older cancer long-term
survivors.
Step 17. References. The references used in this proposal are presented in Table 2.

Conclusion

Conducting research starts by developing a proposal, which is required for several purposes, such
as funding applications, academic degrees or ethical approval prior to start a project. Writing the
proposal for a qualitative study is a challenge for many Spanish nurses because of the emerging
awareness about research. This paper has followed a 17-step process that reviews the main aspects
to be taken into consideration when developing a qualitative project in nursing. The example is
intended to serve as a point of departure for novice researchers who may need guidance and practical
assistance during the research process. Further reading on writing a research proposal is
recommended prior to getting started with qualitative research.

References

1. Zabalegui A, Cabrera E. New nursing education structure in Spain. Nurse Educ Today. 2009; 29(5):
500-504.
2. Macía-Soler L. Investigación en enfermería. Enferm Clin. 2008;18(6): 287-288.
3. Tingen MS, Burnett AH, Murchison RB, Zhu H. The importance of nursing research. J Nurs Educ.
2009; 48(3): 167-170.
4. Romero Ballen MN. Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia (EBE) ¿Avanzamos para transformar?
Index de Enfermería 2003; 40-41: 41-46.
5. Cabrero García, Julio. Enfermería basada en la evidencia y utilización de la investigación. Index de
Enfermería 1999; 27: 12-18.
6. Martín-Arribas MC, González-Gil T, Egea-Zerolo B, Hidalgo-García R, Jones-Mallada C, Moreno-
Casbas T. Analysis of nursing research studies submitted to Spain's health research fund and the
resulting scientific output. J Res Nur. 2009;14(2): 153-166.
7. Cabrero J, Richart M. El debate investigación cualitativa frente a investigación cuantitativa. Enferm
Clin. 1996; 6: 212-217.
8. Lusk SL. Developing an outstanding grant application. West J Nurs Res. 2004; 26(3): 367-373.
9. Ezzy D. Writing a qualitative research proposal. En: Rice PL, Ezzy D, editores. Qualitative Research
Methods: A Health Focus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999: 215-234.
10. Dallas CM, Norr K, Dancy B, Kavanaugh K, Cassata L. An example of a successful research
proposal: part I. West J Nurs Res. 2005; 27(1): 50-72.
11. Dallas CM, Norr K, Dancy BL, Kavanaugh K, Cassata L. An example of a successful research
proposal: part II. West J Nurs Res. 2005; 27(2): 210-231.
12. Vivar CG, McQueen A, Whyte DA, Canga Armayor N. Getting started with qualitative research.
Developing a research proposal. Nurse Res. 2007; 14(3): 60-73.
13. Bandura A. Social learning in theory. Nueva York: General Learning Press, 1977.
14. Benner P. From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo-Park:
Addison-Wesley, 1984.
15. Vivar CG. Meeting the supportive needs and perceived support of young and older long-term
survivors of breast cancer. Unpublished Dissertation. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, 2002.

' ( &&)))* +!,* -.& +! , /. / & $% !$& 01% *('( $%&% &$%
 !" ##

DEJA TU COMENTARIO VER 0 COMENTARIOS Normas y uso de comentarios

| Menú principal | Qué es Index | Servicios | Agenda | Búsquedas bibliográficas | Campus digital | Investigación cualitativa | Evidencia científica |
Index Solidaridad | Noticias | Librería | quid-INNOVA | Casa de Mágina | Mapa del sitio

FUNDACION INDEX Apartado de correos nº 734 18080 Granada, España - Tel/fax: +34-958-293304

' ( &&)))*
View publication stats
+!,* -.& +! , /. / & $% !$& 01% *('( $%&% &$%