Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
1.1 Study Location and Description---------------------------------------------------------------- 1
1.2 Logical Termini------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
1.3 Existing Roadway --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
1.4 Purpose of the Proposed Action--------------------------------------------------------------- 4
1.5 Need for the Proposed Action------------------------------------------------------------------ 5
1.6 Objectives for the Proposed Action ----------------------------------------------------------15
1.7 Planning Context ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------15
1.8 Other Transportation Projects in the Vicinity ----------------------------------------------19
2.0 ALTERNATIVES -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------23
2.1 Proposed Action ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------23
2.2 No-Action Alternative ----------------------------------------------------------------------------28
2.3 Other Alternatives Considered and Alternative Screening-----------------------------31
3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES --------------41
3.1 Land Use, Socio-Economics, and Community--------------------------------------------41
3.2 Properties Acquired for Right-of-Way and Displacements-----------------------------57
3.3 Parks and Recreation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------59
3.4 Air Quality ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------60
3.5 Traffic Noise ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------61
3.6 Historic and Archaeological Resources-----------------------------------------------------62
3.7 Paleontology---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------67
3.8 Water Resources and Floodplains -----------------------------------------------------------68
3.9 Wetlands and Other Waters of the US------------------------------------------------------70
3.10 Biological Resources ----------------------------------------------------------------------------70
3.11 Special Status Species -------------------------------------------------------------------------74
3.12 Hazardous Materials-----------------------------------------------------------------------------75
3.13 Cumulative Impacts------------------------------------------------------------------------------75
4.0 AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT -----------------------------------89
4.1 Agency Coordination ----------------------------------------------------------------------------89
4.2 Public Involvement -------------------------------------------------------------------------------90
5.0 NEXT STEPS -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------95
6.0 REFERENCES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 107
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1. Project Area and Vicinity ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2
Figure 2. Project Area----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
Figure 3. Crash Rates on Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) ------------------ 5
Figure 4. Crash Type Breakdown (2001 to 2003) ----------------------------------------------------- 6
Figure 5. Bus Stop and Pullout Locations --------------------------------------------------------------- 7
Figure 6. Existing and Projected 2035 Operational and Roadway Deficiencies --------------10
Figure 7. Planned Transportation Projects in the Vicinity of the Project Area -----------------21
Figure 8. Proposed Action Alignment --------------------------------------------------------------------24
Figure 9. Proposed Action Cross-Section --------------------------------------------------------------24
Figure 10. 2035 Proposed Action Lane Geometry and Levels of Service -----------------------27
Figure 11. No-Action Alternative ----------------------------------------------------------------------------29
Figure 12. 2035 No-Action Alternative Lane Geometry and Levels of Service -----------------30
Figure 13. Ideal Based on Design Standards Alternative --------------------------------------------35
Figure 14. Pedestrian Zone Alternative -------------------------------------------------------------------36
Figure 15. Minimum Width Raised Median Alternative------------------------------------------------37
Figure 16. Minimum Width Raised Median Alternative - Refined-----------------------------------37
Figure 17. Center Alignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------38
Figure 18. Western Alignment-------------------------------------------------------------------------------39
Figure 19. Weave Alignment---------------------------------------------------------------------------------40
Figure 20. Community Study Area -------------------------------------------------------------------------43
Figure 21. Existing Land Use - Generalized -------------------------------------------------------------44
Figure 22. Future Concept Land Use and Areas of Change ----------------------------------------47
Figure 23. Public and Community Facilities--------------------------------------------------------------48
Figure 24. Intensive Level Survey Area-------------------------------------------------------------------65
Figure 25. Noxious Weeds in the Project Area----------------------------------------------------------73
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1. Conceptual Cross-Section Alternative Screening Results -----------------------------34
Table 2. Minority Populations within the Community Study Area --------------------------------51
Table 3. Low-Income Households within the Community Study Area --------------------------52
Table 4. Property Acquisitions and Displacements1 ------------------------------------------------58
Table 5. Survey Log -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------66
Table 6. List of Noxious Weed Species Present in the Project Area ---------------------------72
Table 7. Current and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions in the Community Study
Area --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------77
Table 8. Potential Impacts of Other Projects----------------------------------------------------------81
Table 9. Cumulative Analysis by Key Resource -----------------------------------------------------86
Table 10. Local Neighborhood Associations and Business Groups ------------------------------91
Table 11. Public Involvement Activities ------------------------------------------------------------------91
Table 12. Summary of Issues ------------------------------------------------------------------------------96
E EA Environmental Assessment
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
I I-25 Interstate 25
I-70 Interstate 70
I-76 Interstate 76
S SAFETEA-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: Legacy for
Users
SB 40 Senate Bill 40
SH 88 State Highway 88
SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer
SIP State Implementation Plan
SWMP storm water management plan
U US 6 6th Avenue
US 40 Colfax Avenue
US 285 Hampden Avenue
USACE US Army Corps of Engineers
USDOT US Department of Transportation
USEPA US Environmental Protection Agency
USFS US Department of Agriculture Forest Service
USFWS US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
UST underground storage tank
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) study conducted to
evaluate transportation improvements along Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to Howard
Place in Denver, Colorado. The City and County of Denver (CCD), in cooperation with the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Colorado Department of Transportation
(CDOT), prepared this PEL Study in accordance with Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU).
In 2005, the current federal transportation authorization bill, SAFETEA-LU, was signed into law.
SAFETEA-LU authorizes the federal surface transportation programs for highways, highway
safety, and transit for the five-year period 2005 to 2009. SAFETEA-LU incorporates changes
aimed at improving and streamlining the environmental process for transportation projects by
allowing states to conduct corridor planning activities prior to the start of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process.
FHWA defines PEL as a voluntary approach to transportation decision-making that considers
environmental, community, and economic goals early in the planning stage and carries them
through project development, design, and construction (FHWA, 2008). This can lead to a better
decision-making process that minimizes duplication of effort, promotes environmental
stewardship, and reduces delays in project implementation (CDOT, 2009).
The following NEPA process principles were followed for this PEL:
Preparation of a project purpose and need
Screening of alternatives and identification of a Proposed Action
Evaluation of their environmental impacts
Coordination with federal, state, and local agencies and public involvement
NEPA establishes a mandate for federal agencies to consider the potential environmental
consequences of their proposed actions, to document the analysis, and to make the information
available to the public for comment prior to implementation.
This PEL is intended to provide the framework for the long-term implementation of the Proposed
Action as funding is available and to be used as a resource for future NEPA documentation. The
technical reports prepared for this PEL are intended for use in support of future NEPA
documentation with minimal re-evaluation of resources and impacts.
1.1 Study Location and Description
Federal Boulevard is a principal north-south urban arterial roadway that is under the jurisdiction
of CDOT as State Highway 88 (SH 88). Federal Boulevard spans 20 miles between Bowles
Avenue to the south and 120th Avenue to the north on the west side of the Denver metropolitan
area and provides access to a number of major east-west roadways, including US 285
(Hampden Avenue), US 6 (6th Avenue), US 40 (Colfax Avenue), Interstate 70 (I-70), and
Interstate 76 (I-76) (Figure 1).
The project area extends along Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue in the south to
approximately Howard Place in the north (Figure 2). East-west boundaries include the alley
between Federal Boulevard and Grove Street to the west and portions of the first row of parcels
immediately adjacent to Federal Boulevard to the east, which are not uniformly shaped.
The project area includes portions of five city parks: Barnum Park, Barnum East Park, Barnum
North Park, Paco Sanchez Park, and Rude Park (Figure 2). The Federal Boulevard/Decatur
Street park-n-Ride light-rail transit (LRT) station (Federal/Decatur LRT station), which is part of
the Regional Transportation District (RTD) FasTracks West Corridor LRT project that is
currently under construction, will be located south of Howard Place and east of Federal
Boulevard.
1.2 Logical Termini
The project area boundaries meet the criteria for logical termini and independent utility as
required by FHWA. The project area extends north from the 5th Avenue northern terminus of the
Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) project to immediately south of the Federal
Boulevard/Howard Place intersection. South of 5th Avenue, the planned Federal Boulevard
cross-section includes three northbound and three southbound lanes. The existing Federal
Boulevard cross-section immediately south of the Federal Boulevard/Howard Place intersection
includes three northbound and three southbound lanes. This cross-section extends north
through the Federal Boulevard/Howard Place intersection and the Federal Boulevard/Colfax
Avenue interchange.
1.3 Existing Roadway
From 5th Avenue to 10th Avenue, the existing roadway cross-section consists of two northbound
lanes, three southbound lanes, and a center-turn lane. The existing pedestrian zone consists of
3-foot (ft) attached sidewalks on both sides of the street, except for a segment of sidewalk on
the eastern side of Federal Boulevard between Severn Place and 8th Avenue, which is 5-ft wide
with 3-ft buffer between the roadway and the sidewalk.
From 10th Avenue to Howard Place, the existing roadway cross-section consists of three
northbound lanes, three southbound lanes, and a center turn lane. The pedestrian zone
consists of 3-ft attached sidewalks on both sides of the street, except for a segment of sidewalk
on the eastern side of Federal Boulevard between 10th Avenue and Howard Place. This
segment of sidewalk is 5-ft with a 3-ft buffer from 10th Avenue to approximately 12th Avenue
where it transitions to a 5-ft attached sidewalk. The lane widths from 5th Avenue to Howard
Place vary from nine to twelve ft wide. The posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour (mph) along
Federal Boulevard.
1.4 Purpose of the Proposed Action
The purpose of the proposed action is to:
Improve the safety and efficiency of Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to Howard Place
Relieve traffic congestion on Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to Howard Place
Improve multi-modal mobility (pedestrians, bicycles, public transit, and private/commercial
vehicles) along Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to Howard Place, linking with existing
and planned sections of Federal Boulevard to the north and south
14 0.1
2002 Average Statewide Rate for
Similar Transportation Facilities 0.09
12
Overall 3-Year Project Area Average 0.08
(2001 to 2003)
10 0.07
Crash Rate*
0.06
8
0.05
6
0.04
4 0.03
0.02
2
0.01
0 0
Total Injury Property Fatal**
Damage
Only
Crash Type
th
Source: Federal Boulevard (5 Avenue to Howard Place) Planning Environmental Linkage Study Safety Assessment Report (FHU,
2009a)
* The crash rates are per million vehicle miles of travel (VMT)
** Fatal rates are per 100 million VMT.
6%
3% Rear-End
3%
4% Approach Turn
Broadside
40%
11%
Sideswipe (Same Direction)
Fixed Objects
Head-On
th
Source: Federal Boulevard (5 Avenue to Howard Place) Planning Environmental Linkage Study Safety Assessment Report (FHU,
2009a)
* All Other Types include those crash types that are less than two percent of the total crash types and include Other Non-
Collision, Bicycle, Involving Other Objects, and Unknown.
The sidewalks in the project area are in poor condition and in various places parallel the
roadway with no buffer zone between the sidewalk and roadway. The majority of the sidewalks
are less than five feet wide and do not comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
standards.
Bicyclists do not have a dedicated on-street bicycle lane, so many use the existing sidewalks for
north-south travel along Federal Boulevard. This leads to pedestrian and bicycle conflicts due to
the narrow width of the sidewalks.
1.5.2 Traffic Operations
A Traffic Report was prepared for the project area (FHU, 2009b). The average weekday daily
traffic volumes on Federal Boulevard are approximately 40,000 vehicles per day (vpd) between
US 6 and 8th Avenues and 41,400 vpd between 8th and Colfax Avenues. Daily traffic volume
forecasts for 2035 are in the 53,000 to 55,000 vpd range on Federal Boulevard in the project
area with increases of approximately 30 percent compared with existing traffic volumes.
The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) uses the
term level of service (LOS) with values ranging from A to F to describe the operation
characteristics of intersections and roadways. LOS A represents the best possible operations
conditions, while LOS F is characterized by severe congestion and extremely poor traffic
operations (i.e. gridlock). In urbanized areas, LOS D is generally considered to be acceptable
for peak hour operations during the morning (AM) and afternoon (PM), which coincide with the
morning and evening commute.
Existing traffic operations along Federal Boulevard at the signalized US 6 westbound and
eastbound ramps and signalized 10th Avenue and Holden Place intersections are acceptable
(LOS D or better); however, the 8th Avenue intersection operates at LOS F (or failing) during the
afternoon peak hour (PM) (Figure 6). Operation forecasts with 2035 traffic from projected
regional growth, including construction of the Federal/Decatur LRT station and proposed
adjacent redevelopment, show continued degradation to an unacceptable level of congestion
(LOS F or failing) during the both the peak morning and afternoon hour for the 8th Avenue
intersection and during the peak afternoon hour for the US 6 westbound ramps and 10th Avenue
intersection.
The lane widths within the project area vary from nine to twelve feet, which is less than
AASHTO and CDOT standards (which recommend a minimum of 11 ft). The current median
within the project area is a painted median that serves as a two-way center turn lane, which
varies from 9 ft to 12 ft wide.
The intersections of Federal Boulevard/9th Avenue and Federal Boulevard/10th Avenue are off-
set. Offset intersections can create confusion and cause additional turning conflicts by drivers
unfamiliar with the area, since the drivers may assume that these streets are continuous across
Federal Boulevard.
Completion of the Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) project to the south, an
existing six through lane cross-section from immediately south of the Federal Boulevard and
Howard Place intersection north to Colfax Avenue, and an existing lane imbalance from 5th
Avenue to 10th Avenue will result in a discontinuity of travel lanes on Federal Boulevard through
the project area. The planned cross-section for Federal Boulevard from Alameda Avenue to 5th
Avenue, south of the project, consists of three northbound 11-ft lanes, three southbound 11-ft
lanes, a 16-ft wide raised median, and 8-ft wide pedestrian zones on the east and west sides of
the street. The pedestrian zone consists of a 5-ft sidewalk and 3-ft landscaped/hardscaped
buffer between the roadway and the sidewalk on both sides of the street.
The existing cross-section north of the Federal Boulevard/Lakewood Gulch Bridge, immediately
south of Howard Place, consists of three northbound 11-ft lanes, three southbound 11-ft lanes,
a northbound left turn lane at Howard Place, a northbound right turn lane at Howard Place, an
attached 10-ft sidewalk on the western side of Federal Boulevard, and a 10-ft detached
sidewalk on the eastern side. The six through lane configuration continues north through the
Federal Boulevard and Colfax Avenue interchange.
The planned cross-section for the Federal Boulevard/Lakewood Gulch Bridge will be wide
enough to accommodate three northbound 11-ft lanes, three southbound 11-ft lanes, a 16-ft
wide raised median, a 2-ft shoulder on the east side, an 11-ft bus bay lane on the west side, and
10.5-ft sidewalks on both sides of the street. However, the bridge will initially be striped to match
the existing lane configuration and does not include capacity improvements. The Federal
Boulevard/Lakewood Gulch Bridge improvements will tie in with the existing roadway at 12th
Avenue.
1.5.3 Multi-Modal Connectivity
Multi-modal connectivity is the ability to provide connections between different modes of
transportation. For this project, modal connectivity is focused on interactions between vehicles,
pedestrian, bicycle, and public transportation.
The Federal/Decatur LRT station will be located south of Howard Place and east of Federal
Boulevard. The Federal/Decatur LRT station is located near major roadways, low- to medium-
density land uses, important transit routes, and special event centers and will function as an
important transportation hub for park-n-Ride commuters, bus transfers, and the many residents
and workers from nearby neighborhoods and businesses (RTD, 2003b). This station will provide
the last park-n-Ride opportunity for RTD FasTracks West Corridor LRT project commuters
destined for downtown Denver; therefore, it is expected to attract a large number of park-n-Ride
users (RTD, 2003b).
Community facilities are typically centers of pedestrian activity and cause pedestrians to travel
along or cross Federal Boulevard in order to gain access to them. The community facilities
identified within or in the vicinity of the project area include:
Several public parks, recreational trails, and bicycle routes
Barnum Recreation Center (360 Hooker Street)
Rude Recreation Center (2855 W. Holden Place)
Ross-Barnum Branch Denver Public Library (3570 W. 1st Avenue)
Denver Department of Human Services (1200 Federal Boulevard)
Denver Community Credit Union (1065 Federal Boulevard)
Four schools
Multiple places of worship
In addition, pedestrians will be accessing the Federal/Decatur LRT station. Approximately six
percent of the average weekday mode of access (2025) to the station is projected to be by
pedestrians (RTD, 2003b).
The Pedestrian Master Plan (CCD, 2004) builds upon the Enhanced Bus Transit Corridor
designation for Federal Boulevard identified in Blueprint Denver (CCD, 2002) and presents a
series of guidelines. These guidelines include:
16-ft minimum pedestrian zone consisting of
o 8-ft minimum tree lawn (either green or hardscaped) and a 8-ft minimum
continuous detached sidewalk or
o 16-ft continuous attached sidewalk
Curb ramps at every intersection
Benches or shelters at most transit stops
Pedestrian signals at all signalized intersections
Crosswalks, signage, pedestrian refuges, and other safety features define the pedestrian
environment at major intersections
1.5.3.3 Bicycle Mobility
Federal Boulevard is not a designated bicycle route. Tenth Avenue, which crosses Federal
Boulevard, is east-west bicycle route D-12, and the Lakewood Gulch trail, which crosses
underneath Federal Boulevard at the Lakewood Gulch Bridge, is east-west bicycle route D-10
(CCD, 2006).
A long term goal of the Bicycle Master Plan (CCD, 1993) is to extend the Weir Gulch trail from
Barnum Park to Barnum Park North through a new grade separated crossing of US 6 and an
extension through north Weir Gulch from Barnum Park North at 8th Avenue, crossing Federal
Boulevard, to the existing trail along Weir Gulch and ultimately to South Platte River Greenway.
Due to a lack of signage, it may not be clear to bicyclists where the D-2, D-10, and D-12 bicycle
routes cross Federal Boulevard (Figure 5). This can result in bicyclists riding in traffic along
Federal Boulevard, which due to narrow lane widths and the high volume of traffic is unsafe.
Denver as either Areas of Stability or Areas of Change. According to Blueprint Denver, Areas of
Stability include primarily stable residential neighborhoods and their associated commercial
areas, where limited change is expected during the next 20 years. The goal for an Area of
Stability is to identify and maintain the character of the area while accommodating some new
development and redevelopment.
Blueprint Denver also identifies Areas of Change, which represent those areas of Denver where
change is either underway or desirable. These Areas of Change are primarily older industrial
districts, major arterial corridors, and areas adjacent to existing or planned transit facilities.
Blueprint Denver seeks to distribute forecasted growth to Areas of Change, where it will be most
beneficial and away from Areas of Stability, where it may have some negative consequences.
The planned RTD FasTracks West Corridor LRT project crosses Federal Boulevard near
Howard Place within the project area. The Federal/Decatur LRT station will be located south of
Howard Place and east of Federal Boulevard. According to the Blueprint Denver, the areas just
south of Holden Place and south of Howard Place are planned for transit-oriented development
[TOD] (CCD, 2002). It is a high priority for the CCD to provide housing opportunities for existing
residents in Areas of Change.
1.7.5 Denver Game and Pedestrian Master Plans
The Denver Game Plan is the master plan for Denver’s parks and recreation CCD, 2003a).
Federal Boulevard is a designated parkway for its entire length within the city limits (CCD,
2003a). Historically, Federal Boulevard was a tree-lined street from the Barnum neighborhood
near Alameda Avenue in the south to the Regis University area at 50th Avenue in the north
(CCD, 1995). Street cars ran on Federal Boulevard between Alameda Avenue and Colfax
Avenue. Over the years, trees and the associated tree lawns have been lost to roadway
widening.
The Pedestrian Master Plan (CCD, 2004) builds upon the Enhanced Bus Transit Corridor
designation for Federal Boulevard identified in Blueprint Denver (CCD, 2002) and presents a
series of guidelines. In addition, the Pedestrian Master Plan identifies the need for a special
crossing along Federal Boulevard at 12th Avenue.
1.7.6 2035 Metro Vision Regional Transportation Plan
The 2035 Metro Vision Regional Transportation Plan defines Federal Boulevard as an Urban
Road, which is a multimodal arterial facilitating longer and medium distance regional trips
(DRCOG, 2007). The primary goals for Urban Roads are to:
Increase travel reliability and improve mobility for private and commercial vehicles
Serve the proposed Urban Centers in the corridor
Accommodate growth in personal motor vehicle and freight travel
Improve management of the existing facilities and travel demand
Provide alternative modes of transportation to travelers
Reduce motor vehicle crash rates
Eliminate design deficiencies
Maintain or improve pavement to optimal condition
The use of travel sheds allow for an analysis of the effectiveness of the layout of streets,
including the grid and arterial system, transit routes, bike routes, and pedestrian throughways,
how they connect and well people move through the system. Due to the major east-west
barriers of US 6 and Lakewood Gulch, as well as the north-south barrier of Interstate 25 (I-25),
traffic is funneled to the major arterials in the West Side Travel Shed, such as Federal
Boulevard and Sheridan Boulevard. More than 86 percent of traffic in the West Side Travel
Shed is pass-through trips (CCD, 2008a).
1.8 Other Transportation Projects in the Vicinity
In addition to the corridor-specific, citywide, metropolitan area, and statewide plans that include
the project area, a series of transportation projects, including the RTD FasTracks West Corridor
LRT project, I-25 Valley Highway project, Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue)
project, and the Federal Boulevard Bridge over Lakewood Gulch reconstruction, are planned in
and within the vicinity of the project area. Figure 7 depicts the various study areas for the other
planned transportation projects.
These transportation projects include:
RTD West Corridor LRT project
CDOT I-25 Valley Highway project
CDOT and CCD Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) project
RTD Federal Boulevard Bridge Replacement at Lakewood Gulch project
1.8.1 RTD FasTracks West Corridor LRT Project
The RTD FasTracks West Corridor LRT project (RTD, 2003a; RTD, 2003b; RTD, 2004), which
is currently under construction, will extend 12.1 miles from the Denver Union Station in
downtown Denver to the Jefferson County Government Center in Golden. As part of the RTD
FasTracks West Corridor LRT project, the Federal/Decatur LRT station will be located south of
Howard Place and west of Federal Boulevard. Additionally, the Federal Boulevard Bridge over
Lakewood Gulch will be replaced (RTD, 2007).
1.8.2 I-25 Valley Highway Project
The I-25 Valley Highway project (CDOT, 2005a; CDOT, 2006; CDOT, 2007c) includes the
reconstruction of I-25 from Logan Street to US 6 and the redesign of interchanges on I-25 from
Broadway to US 6 and west on US 6 to Federal Boulevard. Due to current funding limitations
and the requirements for fiscal-constraint, only Phases 1 and 2 of the Preferred Alternative as
identified in the I-25 Valley Highway Final EIS (CDOT, 2006), were selected for implementation
in the I-25 Valley Highway ROD (CDOT, 2007c). FHWA and CDOT intend to implement
additional phases of the Preferred Alternative as funding allows. Phase 1 includes:
Relocation of the on ramp from Federal Boulevard to eastbound US 6 from the south and
east sides of Barnum East Park to the north side of Barnum East Park. This will result in a
more standard diamond configuration for the US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange
Conversion of 5th Avenue to two-way operation east of Federal Boulevard
Reconstruction of Barnum East Park
Construction of a south side slip ramp providing access to Bryant Street via the US
6/Federal Boulevard interchange
Closure of the partial interchange at US 6 and Bryant Street, with Bryant Street access to
be provided via the slip ramps and collector-distributor system included in the US 6/Federal
Boulevard interchange
Replacement of the Federal Boulevard bridge over US 6, along with associated
improvements
1.8.3 Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) project
The Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) project (CDOT, 2007b; CDOT, 2008)
includes a planned cross-section for Federal Boulevard from Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue,
consisting of:
Three northbound 11-ft lanes
Three southbound 11-ft lanes
A 16-ft wide raised median
An 8-ft wide pedestrian zone on the east and west sides of the street
The pedestrian zone consists of a 5-ft wide sidewalk and 3-ft wide buffer on both sides of the
street. The posted speed limit for this section is 35 mph.
2.0 ALTERNATIVES
This chapter presents the Proposed Action and the No-Action Alternative and describes the
development, evaluation, and screening of alternatives for transportation improvements along
Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to immediately south of Howard Place. As part of the
alternatives development and screening process, public involvement and outreach efforts were
conducted with the local businesses and neighborhoods. The agency coordination and public
involvement activities conducted for this project are summarized in Chapter 4.
The No-Action Alternative was included in the screening process and has been carried through
this PEL to serve as a benchmark against which the other alternatives are compared. The No-
Action Alternative will not address the purpose and need for this project but is being carried
through the analysis for comparison. Traffic volumes and LOS for the No-Action Alternative
were prepared for all intersections within the project area.
2.1 Proposed Action
Preliminary engineering plans for the Proposed Action are included in the Preliminary Design
Plan Set (FHU, 2009c). The Proposed Action (Figures 8 and 9) consists of the following
elements:
Federal Boulevard roadway alignment and improvements
o Conversion of the northbound Federal Boulevard auxiliary lane from 5th Avenue to
eastbound US 6, which is planned as part of the I-25 Valley Highway project, to a
northbound through lane
o Restriping of the Federal Boulevard bridge over US 6, which will be reconstructed as
part of the I-25 Valley Highway project, with an additional northbound through lane
o Construction of three 11-ft southbound through lanes, three 11-ft northbound through
lanes, and a 16-ft raised median with a left turn lane at the 5th Avenue, 6th Avenue
on- and off-ramp, 7th Avenue, 8th Avenue, 9th Avenue, 10th Avenue, 11th Avenue, 12th
Avenue, and Holden Place intersections on Federal Boulevard from US 6 to
approximately 12th Avenue
o Elimination of the T-intersections at Severn Place and Barberry Place on Federal
Boulevard
o Widening of Federal Boulevard from the right-of-way boundary line on the west side
of Federal Boulevard toward the east between US 6 and approximately 12th Avenue
with an additional northbound lane
o Restriping of Federal Boulevard from approximately 12th Avenue to approximately
Howard Place including the Federal Boulevard bridge over Lakewood Gulch, which
will be reconstructed as part of the RTD FasTracks West Corridor LRT project, with
an additional northbound through lane
o Construction of new curb and gutter on both sides of Federal Boulevard from 5th
Avenue to Howard Place
o Elimination of access curb cuts where possible along Federal Boulevard between 5th
Avenue and Howard Place
Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements
o Replacement of the discontinuous sidewalk on both sides of Federal Boulevard with
an 8-ft pedestrian zone consisting of either a detached 5-ft sidewalk with a 3-ft buffer
or an attached 8-ft sidewalk with ADA-compliant curb ramps and driveway cuts
o Installation of crosswalk pavement markings and countdown pedestrian signal heads
at the Federal Boulevard/8th Avenue and Federal Boulevard/10th Avenue
intersections
o Maintain existing ADA accessible routes for properties along Federal Boulevard
between 5th Avenue and Howard Place
o Improve access to the Federal/Decatur LRT station
Water Quality/Drainage Improvements
o Construction of a water quality pond in the vicinity of Weir Gulch to manage storm
water flows in the area of 8th Avenue in accordance with CDOT and CCD Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) requirements
o Increase the size of the stormceptors (best management practice [BMP]) to manage
storm water flows in the area of 12th Avenue, which will be installed by RTD during
replacement of the Federal Boulevard bridge over Lakewood Gulch
The Proposed Action would address the needs identified Section 1.5 as follows.
2.1.1.1 Safety
As traffic is predicted to increase by the year 2035, the addition of a third northbound lane would
reduce congestion along the corridor and decrease the probability of crashes. Addressing the
lane imbalance would reduce rear-end crashes and approach turn crashes.
Widening of the northbound and southbound lanes to a minimum of 11 ft would provide greater
room for vehicles to avoid rear-end crashes and provide vehicles adequate space to pass buses
in the right lane of the roadway, which can lead to rear-end crashes. Wider lane widths would
reduce sideswipe (same direction) crashes.
The raised median would replace the painted two-way left turn median and eliminate the T-
intersections at Severn Place and Barberry Place on Federal Boulevard. This would prevent
northbound vehicles from making unprotected turns across three lanes of traffic and limits
vehicles to right-in/right-out movements except at the 5th Avenue, 6th Avenue on- and off-ramp,
7th Avenue, 8th Avenue, 9th Avenue, 10th Avenue, 11th Avenue, 12th Avenue, and Holden Place
intersections on Federal Boulevard . This barrier would reduce approach turn, broadside, head-
on, and sideswipe (opposite direction) crashes.
The addition of an 8-ft pedestrian zone would provide pedestrians and bicyclists protection from
the adjacent roadway. Updated curb ramps would improve safety at intersections and meet
ADA requirements.
Additional information is provided in the Safety Assessment Report was prepared for the project
area (FHU, 2009a). During final engineering design, the safety assessment will be updated to
reflect current conditions and be incorporated into the final engineering design process.
Numerous driveways exceed the State Highway Access Code (CDOT, 2002), which allows one
access per parcel. Many properties have more than one access, which increases the probability
for accidents. Access management involves provide access to property, reducing the number of
traffic conflicts points, and improving the flow of traffic on the roadway. Where feasible,
accesses for businesses would be combined, relocated, and potentially shared in order to
reduce traffic conflicts along Federal Boulevard. Discussions with property owner(s) would occur
prior to implementing any proposed access modifications. During final engineering design,
access points (i.e., new, modified or combined) will be identified in a formal access control plan
prepared for the Proposed Action from 5th Avenue to Howard Place along Federal Boulevard. All
access points would be constructed in accordance with CCD and ADA standards.
2.1.1.2 Traffic Operations
Widening the roadway to include three lanes in the northbound direction, as already exists for
the southbound direction would benefit operational performance. The addition of the third
northbound lane would be most significant during times when a bus must stop for boarding or
alighting of passengers. By providing drivers an additional lane, some would avoid the right lane
when a bus is ahead, reducing congestion and quick lane changes throughout the corridor.
When combined with wider 11-ft lanes, the Proposed Action would improve LOS and capacity
through the project area (Figure 10). In addition, the installation of a raised curb median
throughout the corridor would help to control access to individual driveways throughout the
segment reducing the potential vehicular and pedestrian conflicts.
Additional information is provided in Traffic Report prepared for the project area (FHU, 2009b).
During final engineering design, the traffic report will be updated to reflect current conditions and
be incorporated into the final engineering design process.
2.1.1.3 Multi-Modal Connectivity
The Proposed Action would affect the four modes of transportation as follows:
(Vehicle) Auto – Vehicles would experience shorter travel times through the corridor,
resulting in decreased congestion, improved LOS, and more efficient access to the planned
Federal/Decatur LRT station park-n-Ride.
Pedestrian – Pedestrian facilities, such as sidewalks and curb ramps, would be upgraded
to meet ADA standards. A continuous 8-ft pedestrian zone on both sides of Federal
Boulevard from 5th Avenue to Howard Place would provide greater spacing between
pedestrians and the roadway and provide improved access to the bus stops along Federal
Boulevard and the planned Federal/Decatur LRT station southeast of the Federal
Boulevard/Howard Place intersection.
Figure 10. 2035 Proposed Action Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
Bicycle Mobility – Although Federal Boulevard does not have a dedicated on-street
bicycle lane and is not a designated north-south bicycle route, the addition of a third
northbound lane would improve safety for bicyclists traveling along Federal Boulevard. The
use of a sidewalk by a bicyclist is in violation of Denver ordinance; however, bicyclists use
the sidewalks to travel north-south along Federal Boulevard. The continuous 8-ft pedestrian
zone will reduce pedestrian and bicycle conflicts, provide access to the east-west D-2, D-
10, and D-12 bicycle routes, as well as improve access to the bus stops along Federal
Boulevard and the planned Federal/Decatur LRT station. Installation of crosswalk
pavement markings and countdown pedestrian signal heads at the Federal Boulevard/10th
Avenue intersection would improve safety for bicyclists utilizing the D-12 bicycle route
along 10th Avenue (Figure 5). Adequate signage would be furthered accessed during final
engineering design to make it clear to bicyclists where the D-2, D-10, and D-12 bicycle
routes cross Federal Boulevard.
Public Transit – Buses would share the same improved travel times as autos, which
increase the on-time performance of buses in the corridor and improve access to the
Federal/Decatur LRT station. Providing an 8-ft pedestrian zone would improve passenger
safety (both pedestrian and bicyclist) during boardings and de-boardings at bus stops.
2.2 No-Action Alternative
The No-Action Alternative would leave Federal Boulevard as it currently is and would not
provide any improvements beyond the existing transportation system (Figure 11). The roadway
would remain the same, with three southbound and two northbound lanes (nine to twelve feet in
width), and a continuous two-way left turn median. A small segment of Federal Boulevard from
10th Avenue to Holden Place has three southbound and three northbound lanes, and a
continuous two-way left turn median. The third northbound lane turns into a right turn only lane
at Holden Place. The existing sidewalks along the Federal Boulevard corridor are either narrow
or non-existent, and the curb ramps at intersections do not meet current ADA or CDOT
standards. As part of the state highway system (SH 88), normal maintenance of Federal
Boulevard would continue to be performed by CDOT.
For the purpose of travel demand forecasting and identifying resource impacts that are directly
related to traffic volume, such as air quality and noise, transportation projects currently planned
in the vicinity of the project are included along with the No-Action Alternative. These other
transportation improvements have committed or identified funds for construction and will be
made regardless of whether or not any other improvements are made to Federal Boulevard (5th
Avenue to Howard Place). Travel demand forecasting predicts traffic conditions that are
expected to occur on the transportation system in the design year (2035) (Figure 12). The traffic
analysis is further discussed in the Traffic Report (FHU, 2009b).
Committed projects that are included in the travel demand forecasting for the No-Action
Alternative include:
RTD FasTracks West Corridor LRT project
CDOT I-25 Valley Highway project, includes reconstruction of the US 6/Federal Boulevard
interchange
CDOT and CCD Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) project
RTD Federal Boulevard bridge over Lakewood Gulch replacement
These projects were previously discussed in Section 1.8.
Figure 12. 2035 No-Action Alternative Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
Step 1 of the screening process resulted in the establishment of an eastern alignment for
Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to Howard Place. Additional information on establishment of
the eastern alignment is presented in the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Colfax Avenue)
Conceptual Alignment Study (CCD. 2008b).
2.3.2 Step 2 - Conceptual Cross-Section Alternatives
Alternative cross-sections were evaluated based on the widening of Federal Boulevard with an
eastern alignment. Table 1 summarizes the conceptual cross-section alternative screening
results. Step 2 of the screening process resulted in the establishment of the Minimum Width
Raised Median Alternative as the cross-section for Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to
Howard Place and the elimination of the Ideal Based on Design Standards Alternative and
Pedestrian Zone Alternative cross-sections.
Each alternative developed was evaluated against two sets of criteria: a purpose and need
analysis and an environmental sensitivity analysis.
Purpose and Need Analysis – Assessed the preliminary alternatives against the purpose
and need criteria of:
Environmental Sensitivity Analysis – Evaluated the alternatives against the following
environmental resources:
o Replacement of the discontinuous sidewalk on both sides of Federal Boulevard with
an 8-ft pedestrian zone consisting of either a detached 5-ft sidewalk with a 3-ft buffer
or an attached 8-ft sidewalk with ADA-compliant curb ramps and driveway cuts
o Installation of crosswalk pavement markings and countdown pedestrian signal heads
at the Federal Boulevard/8th Avenue and Federal Boulevard/10th Avenue
intersections
o Maintain existing ADA accessible routes for properties along Federal Boulevard
between 5th Avenue and Howard Place
o Improve access to the Federal/Decatur LRT station
o Construction of a water quality pond in the vicinity of Weir Gulch to manage storm
water flows in the area of 8th Avenue in accordance with CDOT and CCD Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) requirements
o Increase the size of the stormceptors (best management practice [BMP]) to manage
storm water flows in the area of 12th Avenue, which will be installed by RTD during
replacement of the Federal Boulevard bridge over Lakewood Gulch
o Impacts to residences or businesses
o Impacts to parks
o Impacts to properties that appeared to exceed 50 years of age based on an initial
reconnaissance survey for properties that may be eligible for the NRHP
o Impacts to sites with potential hazardous material issues
o Impacts to facilities that provide community services to low-income and minority
populations
o Safety (lane width, sidewalks, median, and pedestrian buffer zones)
developed to verify the establishment of the eastern alignment, which was partially based on
avoidance of properties that appeared to exceed 50 years of age based on an initial
reconnaissance survey for properties that may be eligible for the NRHP. Figure 17 depicts a
center alignment that would widen Federal Boulevard to both the west and the east of the
roadway centerline. Figure 18 depicts a western alignment that would widen Federal Boulevard
from the property line on the east side of Federal Boulevard and extend toward the west.
The center alignment (Figure 17) would require that 24 to 26 properties be partially acquired for
right-of-way and 21 to 23 properties be fully acquired for right-of-way. The western alignment
(Figure 18) would require that four to six properties be partially acquired for right-of-way and 25
to 27 properties be fully acquired for right-of-way. The eastern alignment of the Proposed Action
would require that nine to 11 properties be partially acquired for right-of-way and nine to 11
properties be fully acquired for right-of-way.
Step 4 of the screening process verified the eastern alignment of Federal Boulevard included in
the Proposed Action as requiring the fewest properties acquired for right-of-way.
Figure 17. Center Alignment
by the project. Where appropriate, information regarding the CCD and/or State of Colorado as a
whole has been included for comparison. The community study area includes the following
Denver neighborhoods adjacent the project area.
Villa Park – A mostly residential neighborhood with limited commercial and industrial areas
located immediately adjacent to Federal Boulevard
Sun Valley – A mixed-used neighborhood containing scattered residences and public
housing in the eastern portion of the neighborhood and commercial and industrial areas
and public facilities located immediately adjacent to Federal Boulevard
Barnum – A mostly residential neighborhood with commercial areas along Federal
Boulevard
Valverde – A neighborhood containing industrial areas in the eastern portion of the
neighborhood and residential areas along Federal Boulevard
West Colfax – A mostly residential neighborhood with a commercial area along Colfax
Avenue and residences and commercial facilities located along Federal Boulevard
3.1.1 Existing and Planned Land Use
Figure 21 shows existing land use within the community study area, as identified in Blueprint
Denver (CCD, 2002). As shown on Figure 21, the community study area includes a wide range
of land uses. The South Platte River and I-25 borders the east side of the community study
area.
The properties along the South Platte River corridor tend to be industrial in use and have a mix
of new and old properties of varying character, sizes, and specific industrial land use. These
industrial areas are located primarily along the eastern side of community study area. The main
arterial thoroughfares, such as Colfax Avenue, Federal Boulevard, and US 6, tend to be lined
with commercial or light industrial land uses.
Residential areas within the community study area are generally separated from the main
arterial thoroughfares by the land uses described above. The residential areas are generally
older, established neighborhoods developed between the late 1890s and the 1950s, with some
localized later development or redevelopment, such as multi-family units in some locations.
In the early 2000s, the City and County of Denver undertook a comprehensive planning effort to
provide a vision for integrated future land use and transportation within the city. This vision,
known as Blueprint Denver (CCD, 2002), is an adopted Denver plan and is a supplement to the
Denver Comprehensive Plan (CCD, 2000). Blueprint Denver identified all areas of Denver as
either Areas of Stability or Areas of Change. According to Blueprint Denver, Areas of Stability
include primarily stable residential neighborhoods and their associated commercials areas,
where limited change is expected during the next 20 years. The goal for an Area of Stability is to
identify and maintain the character of the area while accommodating some new development
and redevelopment.
Blueprint Denver also identifies Areas of Change, which represent those areas of Denver where
change is either underway or desirable. These Areas of Change are primarily older industrial
districts, major arterial corridors, and areas adjacent to existing or planned transit facilities.
Blueprint Denver seeks to distribute forecasted growth to Areas of Change, where it will be most
beneficial and away from Areas of Stability, where it may have some negative consequences.
Figure 22 shows the Areas of Stability and Change identified by Blueprint Denver in the
community study area. The commercial and industrial land adjacent to Federal Boulevard and
the residential, commercial, and industrial properties around the Federal Boulevard/Decatur
Street and Knox Court LRT stations have been identified as Areas of Change.
3.1.1.1 Land Use Impacts
Proposed Action – Federal Boulevard would remain a commercial corridor as designated in
Blueprint Denver. The Proposed Action would require the relocation of some existing
businesses, as described in Section 3.2. However, the proposed transportation investment
would likely support viable business activity in the future.
The Proposed Action would provide wider and continuous sidewalks along Federal Boulevard
with a connection to the planned Federal/Decatur LRT station, improve bicycle/pedestrian
connections across Federal Boulevard, address roadway deficiencies and safety issues. These
improvements will improve the bicycle/pedestrian environment, provide multi-modal travel
options, and improve traffic operations along Federal Boulevard. Existing businesses would
benefit from a safer vehicular and pedestrian environment, as well as an improved image of the
corridor.
The Proposed Action is partially consistent with locally adopted plans. As discussed in Chapter
2, the Proposed Action balances transportation improvements that would be fully consistent
locally adopted plans with environmental and social considerations.
No-Action Alternative – The No-Action Alternative would not affect current land use since no
additional properties would be acquired for right-of-way. However, the No-Action Alternative
would not improve existing safety or congestion along Federal Boulevard, would not
accommodate the transportation needs of the businesses and residents in the project area, and
would not meet the purpose and need of this project. The No-Action Alternative is not consistent
with locally adopted land use plans.
3.1.1.2 Land Use Mitigation
No mitigation is required. Property and business owners impacted directly by the Proposed
Action will be compensated as described in Section 3.2.
3.1.2 Community Facilities, Services, and Neighborhood Cohesion
Community facilities and public services are important factors in maintaining communities. This
section describes the existing community facilities and public services within the community
study area and identifies factors that may contribute to or hinder community development and
cohesion.
3.1.2.1 Community Facilities
Figure 23 shows the type of public and community facilities within the community study area.
Key community facilities include:
Several public parks, recreational trails, and bicycle routes, which are discussed further in
Section 3.3
Barnum Recreation Center (360 Hooker Street)
Rude Recreation Center (2855 W. Holden Place)
Ross-Barnum Branch Denver Public Library (3570 W. 1st Avenue)
Denver Department of Human Services (1200 Federal Boulevard)
Denver Community Credit Union (1065 Federal Boulevard)
Four schools
Multiple places of worship
Neighborhood residents typically have access to public facilities in their neighborhood or
adjacent neighborhood. However, one community facility that is lacking in the area is a full-
service grocery store.
The general availability of community facilities is consistent with the urban residential nature of
the neighborhoods and the long-standing commitment of CCD to provide such facilities to its
residents. CCD established the Focus Neighborhoods Initiative to reinforce its emphasis on
community facilities. The initiative seeks to improve public facilities in neighborhoods that may
have seen underinvestment in public facilities in the past. Within the community study area, the
Villa Park, Valverde, and Sun Valley neighborhoods are included in the Focus Neighborhoods
Initiative (CCD, 2003b).
As a whole, the community study area analyzed has an estimated 14 percent limited English
proficiency. Out of the eight census block groups analyzed, seven of the block groups exceeded
the CCD average of five percent linguistically-isolated households with Spanish as the primary
language (FHU, 2009d). The largest percentage of linguistically-isolated households is located
in the Villa Park neighborhood, located west of Federal Boulevard and north of US 6.
Table 2. Minority Populations within the Community Study Area
The percentage of low-income households was calculated for the community study area by
block group (Table 3) using the following methodology. The average household size for CCD
was determined to be 2.27 (US Census, 2000). The total number of households and ranges of
household incomes was derived for the eight block groups within the community study area and
for CCD as a whole. The 2008 rounded median family income (MFI) for Denver-Aurora is
$71,800 (US Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD], 2008). The low-income
threshold for the 2.27 average household size in CCD was determined to be $17,831 based on
the 30 percent of the MFI value. Since census income statistics are divided into increments of
$5,000, any household (regardless of the number of people), in CCD with an income below
$19,999 is considered low-income. Approximately 22.7 percent of households in CCD are below
the identified threshold and are considered low-income.
According to the census block data, five of the eight block groups in the community study area
have higher percentages of low-income populations than the CCD as a whole. The highest
percentage of low-income households (84.2 percent) was identified in the Sun Valley
neighborhood, which has an affordable housing complex located within the community study
area. The residents of Sun Valley also identified themselves as transit-dependent during a
small-group meeting with the Sun Valley neighborhood group on February 26, 2009 (Chapter
4).
Table 3. Low-Income Households within the Community Study Area
Proposed Action
Outreach to and Participation of Minority and Low-Income Communities
The agency and public involvement program is further discussed in Chapter 4. Elements of the
public involvement program particularly targeting minority and low-income populations and the
local community included:
Project postcards and flyers in English and Spanish distributed to the
businesses/residences in the community study area notifying them of the April 22, 2009
public meeting
Project flyers in English and Spanish distributed to the Denver Housing Authority Sun
Valley Homes notifying them of the April 22, 2009 public meeting
Project public meeting held on April 22, 2009 at the Eagleton Elementary school in the Villa
Park neighborhood with Spanish translation provided and meeting materials in English and
Spanish
Small group meetings with the Villa Park (February 25, 2009), Sun Valley (February 26,
2009), Barnum (April 14, 2009), and Valverde (March 31, 2009) neighborhood associations
Door-to-door outreach to the businesses along Federal Boulevard (March 19, 2009)
notifying them of the April 22, 2009 public meeting
Benefits to Minority and Low-Income Communities
As shown in Tables 2 and 3, there is a high percentage of minority and low-income populations
in the neighborhoods adjacent to the Proposed Action. Implementation of the project would
include a number of direct benefits to these adjacent neighborhoods. These benefits are
expected to be equitably shared across demographic groups and throughout the community.
Specific project benefits include:
Widening the roadway to include three lanes in the northbound direction, as already exists
for the southbound direction, would benefit operational performance and decrease the
probability of crashes.
A continuous 8-ft pedestrian zone on both sides of Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to
Howard Place would provide greater spacing between pedestrians and the roadway and
provide improved access to the bus stops along Federal Boulevard (improve passenger
safety during boardings and de-boardings), the planned Federal/Decatur LRT station
southeast of the Federal Boulevard/Howard Place intersection, community facilities located
along Federal Boulevard (Denver Department of Human Services, El Centro Esperanza,
John C. Inmann Work and Family Center, Sun Valley Youth Center, and Denver
Community Credit Union) and parks and recreational facilities (Rude Recreation Center,
Rude Park, Barnum Park, Barnum North Park, Barnum East Park, Paco Sanchez Park,
Lakewood Gulch Trail, Weir Gulch bicycle route, and the D-2, D-10, and D-12 bicycle
routes). Updated curb ramps would improve safety at intersections and meet ADA
requirements.
The installation of a raised curb median throughout the corridor would help to control
access to individual driveways throughout the segment reducing the potential for
vehicular/pedestrian conflicts and improve pedestrian safety along Federal Boulevard.
The installation of crosswalk pavement markings and countdown pedestrian signal heads
at the Federal Boulevard/8th Avenue intersection and at the Federal Boulevard/10th Avenue
intersection would improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists utilizing the D-12 bicycle
route along 10th Avenue and improve community cohesion across Federal Boulevard.
Buses would share the same improved travel times as autos, which increase the on-time
performance of buses in the corridor and improve access to the Federal/Decatur LRT
station.
Minority and low-income populations and the general population would benefit equally from
the new jobs created to build the Proposed Action.
Improved multi-modal connectivity would benefit transit-dependent populations and provide
more convenient and faster transit access to employment opportunities and services
throughout the Denver metropolitan region.
Potential for Disproportionate Impacts to Minority and Low-Income Communities
The primary impacts would be related to displacements of businesses, which would be a
disruption for employees, owners, and patrons. The Proposed Action would require full
acquisition of eight properties and the relocation of seven businesses (one property was vacant
at the time of this study) out of a total of approximately 53 businesses along Federal Boulevard
(5th Avenue to Howard Place). Section 3.2 further discusses the properties acquired for right-of-
way and displacements.
Based on the door-to-door outreach activities conducted on March 19, 2009, two of the seven
businesses are operated by corporations, two by Caucasians, one by Hispanics, and two by
Asians. Of the seven businesses impacted, only three appear to be minority-owned and
operated. However, the relocation of businesses would affect these owners and employees in a
similar manner as non minority and non low-income owners and employees. The primary impact
of business displacements would be disruption for employees and owners.
Of these businesses, one business (Family Dollar) was identified by the Sun Valley
neighborhood as providing goods and services to the neighborhood. Based on this public
feedback and comment, a weave alignment (Section 2.3.5 and Figure 19) avoiding this
business was developed. The weave alignment would require nine to 11 properties partially
acquired for right-of-way and 15 to 17 properties fully acquired for right-of-way. Based on these
additional properties acquired for right-of-way, the weave alignment was eliminated from further
consideration.
The Family Dollar retail business located at 990 Federal Boulevard is corporate-owned.
Relocation to another area would result in the loss goods and services to the transit-dependent
patrons from the Sun Valley neighborhood. Two other businesses, the Decatur Market at 1260
Decatur Street and the 7-11 convenience store at 1000 Federal Boulevard, provide similar
services and goods as the Family Dollar store. Both of these businesses are located within 0.5
mile of the Sun Valley neighborhood. In addition, the Fairview Urban Garden, which is located
adjacent to Fairview Elementary school within the Sun Valley neighborhood, provides seasonal
access to fruits and vegetables. A second Family Dollar store is located approximately 0.75 mile
north of the neighborhood at 1845 Federal Boulevard. The Family Dollar store at 1845 Federal
Boulevard can be accessed by a pedestrian following Decatur Street underneath the grade-
separated Colfax Avenue viaduct north to the Mile High Stadium Circle and west on 18th
Avenue. Although the Decatur Market, 7-11, Fairview Urban Garden, and the Family Dollar
store at 1845 Family Dollar are less convenient or a further distance away from the Sun Valley
neighborhood, the goods and services provided by the Family Dollar store at 990 Federal
Boulevard would still be available to the neighborhood residents.
It is not anticipated that full acquisition of property for right-of-way, displacement, or relocation of
any residential units, churches, schools, or other types of community centers would be required
as a result of the project. Permanent access to such facilities is not anticipated to be impacted.
However, access to these facilities may be affected in the short-term during construction
activities.
Temporary Construction Impacts
Several potential short-term and indirect impacts have also been identified, which are generally
associated with construction activities. Potential short-term and indirect impacts during
construction of the project include:
Impeded access for emergency vehicles requiring notification and coordination with the
local emergency responders
Temporary transit stop relocation
Potential access restrictions for businesses
Potential impacts from cut-through traffic into surrounding neighborhoods, including safety,
noise, and air quality
Conclusion
Based on this benefits and impacts analysis, the implementation of the Proposed Action would
not result in disproportionately high and adverse effects on minority and low-income
communities.
No-Action Alternative – The No-Action Alternative would not result in direct impacts to minority
and low-income communities because no transportation improvements would be conducted.
However, the No-Action Alternative would not provide benefits to minority and low-income
communities that the Proposed Action would provide with regard to bicycle, pedestrian, and
vehicle safety, traffic operations, and multi-modal (vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and public
transit) connectivity.
The No-Action Alternative would not provide transportation infrastructure improvements for the
area’s transit-dependent population, meaning these individuals would continue to walk, ride
bicycles, and/or utilize the existing bus system under the current conditions. Under the No-
Action Alternative, the minority and low-income communities in the community study area would
continue to have limited multi-modal connectivity. Lack of improved multi-modal connectivity
would result in less access to the Denver metropolitan area and all of the social and economic
resources it offers.
3.1.3.2 Environmental Justice Mitigation
A strong emphasis has been placed on avoiding adverse impacts to the local community.
However, where such impacts could not be avoided, efforts will be made to avoid and/or
minimize short-term impacts to the minority and low-income community residents during
construction. The primary impacts requiring mitigation include:
Property acquired for right-of-way /relocation
Highlighted acquisitions are those properties that would be acquired as part of the CDOT US 6/Federal Boulevard
interchange reconstruction project but include an incremental increase in right-of-way required due to the Proposed
Action. The property at 690 Federal Boulevard would become a full acquisition due to the right-of-way required for
the Proposed Action.
source. Additionally, the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that private
property may not be taken for a public use without payment of "just compensation." All
impacted owners will be provided notification of the acquiring agency's intent to acquire an
interest in their property including a written offer letter of just compensation specifically
describing those property interests. A Right of Way Specialist will be assigned to each property
owner to assist them with this process.
3.2.2.1 Relocation Planning
In certain situations, it may also be necessary to acquire improvements that are located within a
proposed acquisition parcel. In those instances where the improvements are occupied, it
becomes necessary to "relocate" those individuals from the subject property (residential or
business) to a replacement site. The Uniform Act provides for numerous benefits to these
individuals to assist them both financially and with advisory services related to relocating their
residence or business operation. Although the benefits available under the Uniform Act are far
too numerous and complex to discuss in detail in this document, they are available to both
owner occupants and tenants of either residential or business properties. In some situations,
only personal property must be moved from the real property and this is also covered under the
relocation program. As soon as feasible, any person scheduled to be displaced shall be
furnished with a general written description of the displacing Agency's relocation program which
provides at a minimum, detailed information related to eligibility requirements, advisory services
and assistance, payments, and the appeal process. It shall also provide notification that the
displaced person(s) will not be required to move without at least 90 days advance written notice.
For residential relocatees, this notice cannot be provided until a written offer to acquire the
subject property has been presented, and at least one comparable replacement dwelling has
been made available. Relocation benefits will be provided to all eligible persons regardless of
race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Benefits under the Act, to which each eligible owner
or tenant may be entitled, will be determined on an individual basis and explained to them in
detail by an assigned Right of Way Specialist.
3.3 Parks and Recreation
Five city parks are located adjacent to Federal Boulevard within the project area (Figure 2).
Barnum Park is located south of US 6 and west of Federal Boulevard. Barnum Park
includes the Barnum Recreation Center.
Barnum East Park is south of US 6 and east of Federal Boulevard. Barnum Park East
includes a lighted baseball field and lighted soccer field.
Barnum North Park is north of US 6 and west of Federal Boulevard. Barnum North Park
includes a soccer field and lighted softball field.
Paco Sanchez Park is located to the west of Federal Boulevard and south of Howard
Place.
Rude Park is located east of Federal Boulevard and south of Howard Place. Rude Park
includes the Rude Recreation Center.
In addition, one recreational trail, the Lakewood Gulch Trail, runs perpendicular to Federal
Boulevard in the project area along Lakewood Gulch south of Howard Place. The D-2 and D-10
bicycle routes follow the Lakewood Gulch Trail. The D-12 bicycle route crosses Federal
Boulevard at 10th Avenue. The Weir Gulch pedestrian/bicycle path extends from the South
Platte River Trail to 8th Avenue east of Federal Boulevard.
3.3.1 Parks and Recreation Impacts
Proposed Action – At the 8th Avenue/Federal Boulevard intersection, the Proposed Action would
extend the sidewalk along 8th Avenue to connect to the Weir Gulch pedestrian/bicycle route
providing a link in the a path for bicyclists/pedestrians from the South Platte River trail to
Barnum North Park.
No impacts to Paco Sanchez Park or Rude Park are expected due to the Proposed Action. Any
impacts to these parks are expected to be associated with reconstruction of the Federal
Boulevard Bridge due to bridge construction as part of the Federal Boulevard Bridge
Replacement (RTD, 2007).
No impacts to Barnum Park are expected due to the Proposed Action. Any impacts to this park
are expected to be associated with reconstruction of the US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange
CDOT, 2005a; CDOT, 2006a; CDOT, 2007c).
No-Action Alternative – No parks or recreational resources will be affected as a result of the No-
Action Alternative.
3.3.2 Parks and Recreation Mitigation
No mitigation is necessary.
3.4 Air Quality
An Air Quality Impact Analysis (FHU, 2009e) was conducted to evaluate existing and future air
quality conditions within the project area. The analysis consisted of a regional conformity
evaluation, a local hot-spot analysis for carbon-monoxide (CO), and qualitative analyses for
particulate matter. Projects of the type considered in the PEL must be analyzed at both the
regional and local levels. The streets and highways considered for the analysis included: US 6,
Federal Boulevard, and 8th Avenue, which will likely to be impacted by changes in traffic
patterns by the improvements
3.4.1 Air Quality Impacts
The primary air quality issues of concern for this project are pollutants associated with the
operation of vehicles on roadways. These issues include direct emissions of pollutants from
vehicles, secondary pollutants formed from direct emissions, and road dust. Air quality issues
related to road construction are also a potential short-term concern.
Proposed Action – This project would not result in any meaningful changes in traffic volumes,
vehicle mix, location of the existing facility, or any other factor that would cause an increase in
emissions impacts relative to the No-Action Alternative. As such, air quality impacts due to the
Proposed Action are expected to be the similar to the No-Action Alternative.
No-Action Alternative – Future emissions from vehicles would be minimized through several
federal regulations (such as emission standards) and regional controls (such as street sanding
regulations). The Denver area maintenance plans that are already in place for CO and
suspended particulate matter less than 10 microns in size (PM10) will serve to avoid and
minimize pollutant emissions from vehicles. Due to cleaner vehicles, future daily air pollutant
levels for most pollutants are predicted to be lower than current levels, even with more vehicles
on the roads. Total particulate matter levels may increase in the future because of more
vehicles, but the preliminary analysis indicates the concentrations would meet the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Proposed improvements were found not to cause
violations of health-based air quality standards or other relevant evaluation criteria through the
air quality analysis.
3.4.2 Air Quality Mitigation
Given that air pollutants are not predicted to exceed the NAAQS in the future as a result of the
proposed improvements, mitigation measures for air quality are not necessary for the project.
Future emissions from on-road mobile sources will be minimized globally through several
federal regulations. The Denver area State Implementation Plan (SIPs) for CO, ozone (O3), and
PM10 will serve to avoid and minimize pollutant emissions from project roads.
Standard emission minimization measures for construction activities are recommended,
particularly near sensitive areas such as homes. Neighboring areas could be exposed to
construction-related emissions and particular attention will be given to minimizing total
emissions near sensitive areas such as homes. To address the temporary elevated air
emissions that may be experienced during construction, standard construction mitigation
measures should be incorporated into construction contracts. These include following best
management practices and relevant CDOT construction specifications. These will include:
Engines and exhaust systems on equipment in good working order. Equipment maintained
on a regular basis, and equipment subject to inspection by the project manager to ensure
maintenance.
Fugitive dust systematically controlled through diligent implementation of CDOT’s Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, particularly Sections 107.24, 209 and
250, and APCD’s Air Pollutant Emission Notification requirements.
No excessive idling of inactive equipment or vehicles and comply with CCD’s idling
ordinance (5 minutes).
Construction equipment and vehicles using low-sulfur fuel to reduce pollutant emissions.
Other emission reduction actions may include:
Stationary equipment located as far from sensitive receivers as possible (when conditions
allow).
More strict dust control measures near schools during school hours.
Retrofit older construction vehicles to reduce emissions.
3.5 Traffic Noise
A Traffic Noise Impact Analysis (FHU, 2009f) was conducted for the project following CDOT and
FHWA guidelines and regulations. The traffic noise impact analysis area primarily includes
businesses immediately adjacent to Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) through
the study area. There are also homes, parks and motels facing Federal Boulevard and
numerous homes in the “second row” of receivers, a half block off Federal Boulevard, in several
locations. The overall purpose of the noise analysis is to conclude whether noise levels at any
receivers within 500 ft of potential project improvements may exceed applicable impact
thresholds from the project.
3.5.1 Traffic Noise Impacts
Noise impacts occur when properties analyzed in the project area will have 2035 noise levels at
or above the relevant CDOT Noise Abatement Criteria or will have 2035 noise levels increase
by 10 decibels or more over existing conditions. Properties that are found to be impacted by
noise are then considered for mitigation actions.
Proposed Action – For the Proposed Action, 41(32 commercial properties/9 residential/park
properties) receivers in the study area would be impacted by traffic noise in 2035, which is eight
fewer than the No-Action Alternative. The number of impacted receivers for this alternative is
somewhat reduced because several properties impacted under existing conditions and the No-
Action Alternative would be removed through right-of-way acquisition. This would also remove a
building that is acting as a noise barrier for one of the motel receivers, thereby raising its noise
level above the impact threshold (66 A-weighted decibels [dBA]) for the project.
Adjoining properties in the study area could be exposed to noise from construction activities
from the proposed improvements.
No-Action Alternative – For the No-Action Alternative, 49 receivers (41 commercial properties/8
residential/park properties) in the study area would be impacted by traffic noise in 2035.
3.5.2 Traffic Noise Mitigation
Mitigation actions for these areas were evaluated; however no mitigation actions are
recommended, as described in the Traffic Noise Impact Analysis (FHU, 2009f).
Construction noise would be subject to relevant local regulations and ordinances, and any
construction activities would be expected to comply with them.
3.6 Historic and Archaeological Resources
Historic and archaeological resources encompass man-made features and physical remains of
past human activity, generally at least 50 years old (Properties constructed in 1958 or earlier).
Historic resources include buildings, bridges, railroads, roads, and other structures.
Archaeological resources are often buried and include artifacts and features associated with
prehistoric Native American occupation, but can also include historical (Euro-American)
artifacts, features, and ruins.
Significant historic and archaeological resources are afforded consideration by Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, as well as Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of 1966. Significant historic and archaeological resources are
those that are listed or may be eligible for inclusion on the NRHP. Sites qualifying for the NRHP
must retain sufficient integrity (of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association) and meet one or more of the eligibility criteria specified in 36 CFR 60.4. To merit
NRHP-eligibility, a site must meet one or more of the following criteria:
A. Be associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns
of our history
B. Be associated with the lives of persons significant in our past
Following the end of World War I, Denver experienced a decade-long construction boom that
included the neighborhoods along the entire length of Federal Boulevard. A much-reduced pace
of construction took place during the Depression. By 1940, Federal Boulevard between 6th
Avenue and Colfax Avenue was mostly developed with numerous residences, along with a
commercial laundry, a few gasoline stations and auto repair shops, and at least one grocery
store. By the end of World War II, Federal Boulevard had become a major city thoroughfare. As
a result, the city rezoned the residential and vacant properties along the street, which allowed
these to be developed or redeveloped with intensified commercial uses over the following
decades. Traffic along Federal Boulevard began to increase and the quiet residential character
of the thoroughfare went into decline.
During the 1930s and 1940s, a small number of bars and liquor stores emerged along Federal
Boulevard. The commercial laundry in the 1300 block was greatly expanded between 1940 and
1950. Finally, the east side of Federal Boulevard between West 6th Avenue and West Colfax
Avenue was changed dramatically in the 1950s and 1960s as public housing projects were
developed and large warehouses and manufacturing facilities emerged. Previously dominated
by residences, by the 1970s the street was lined with numerous businesses. Many of these
businesses remain there today; some occupying non-historic buildings while others are housed
in renovated older residences and commercial buildings.
It was determined that none of the APE’s properties were found to be individually eligible for the
NRHP based upon the research and field analysis completed for this project. These conclusions
were drawn because all of the buildings were lacking in historical significance and architectural
integrity. Greater detail about each of the 17 properties surveyed along Federal Boulevard (5th
Avenue to Howard Place) is found on the individual architectural inventory forms in the Intensive
Level Survey of Historic Buildings.
The likelihood of a National Register district being formed in this area was determined to be very
poor. Of the 17 properties found along Federal Boulevard in the APE, it is unlikely that any
would be considered good candidates to contribute to a historic district.
Concurrence from the SHPO on these eligibility determinations has not yet been received.
3.6.1.1 Historic Resources Impacts
Proposed Action – The Proposed Action would have no impacts to historic resources.
No-Action Alternative – The No-Action Alternative would have no impacts to historic resources.
3.6.1.2 Historic Resources Mitigation
No mitigation necessary.
3.6.2 Archaeological Resources
A file search revealed that no prehistoric or historic archaeological sites have been identified to
date within the APE. No undisturbed vacant parcels with the potential to contain archaeological
remains were identified by the field survey in the project area.
3.6.2.1 Archaeological Resources Impacts
Proposed Action – The Proposed Action would have no impacts to archaeological resources.
No-Action Alternative – The No-Action Alternative would have no impacts to archaeological
resources.
3.6.2.2 Archaeological Resources Mitigation
If any archaeological materials (e.g., artifacts, faunal remains) or features are encountered or
unearthed during construction, work would be immediately halted in the vicinity of the find, and
the CDOT archaeologist and SHPO would be promptly notified. The site of the find would be
secured and work would remain halted until it can be evaluated and/or removed by a qualified
professional archaeologist. If warranted, additional archaeological testing or data recovery may
be necessary before work can be resumed in the vicinity of the find.
If bones of potential human origin are encountered during construction, ground-disturbing work
would be halted in the vicinity of the discovery, and the CDOT archaeologist would be promptly
notified. The CDOT archaeologist would assess the find, and the county coroner would be
summoned if necessary to determine the relative age and ethnicity of the individual(s)
represented. Work should not resume in the vicinity of the find until clearance is granted by
CDOT.
3.7 Paleontology
Paleontological resources are the fossilized remains of prehistoric plant and animal organisms,
as well as the mineralized impressions (trace fossils) left as indirect evidence of the form and
activity of such organisms. These non-renewable resources may be scientifically significant and
are protected by the Colorado Historical, Prehistorical and Archaeological Resources Act of
1973.
A Paleontological Survey was conducted for the I-25 Valley Highway project and used as a
resource for this PEL study (RMP, 2003). The field survey of the study area revealed no Denver
Formation geologic unit exposures. A description of the Denver Formation unit is included in the
Paleontological Survey (RMP, 2003).
No fossils were found during the field survey for this study; however, previously documented
scientifically significant fossils have been reported from surficial deposits of late Pleistocene age
and rocks of the Denver Formation within and near the project area.
Oil and Grease – Petroleum hydrocarbons deposited by vehicles on roadways and parking
lots.
3.8.1 Water Resources Impacts
Proposed Action – The reconstruction of this portion of Federal Boulevard will require a
disturbance of approximately 17 acres. CDOT and CCD’s MS4 permitting requires that
permanent water quality improvements be implemented for construction that disturbs more than
1 acre. Permanent water quality improvements have been included in the design. The existing
storm drainage system will be utilized as much as possible to maintain historical drainage paths.
They will be routed to detention facilities that will be constructed to provide 100 percent Water
Quality Capture Volume or 80 percent capture of total suspended solids for this system. This will
treat approximately 90 percent of the runoff along Federal Boulevard. The other 10 percent will
be covered by other administrative mitigations, such as stormwater drain labeling as “No
Dumping Drains to Waterway.”
Federal Boulevard is covered by CCD’S MS4 permit, and final stormwater plans for the
improvements will be reviewed and approved by both CDOT and CCD. Additional permits and
submittals that may be required for activities associated with construction include a Colorado
discharge permit system (CDPS) permit, a stormwater management plan, and certification to
CDOT from Denver that the project meets their MS4 permit.
No-Action Alternative – Under the No-Action Alternative, stormwater would continue to
discharge directly into Weir Gulch and Lakewood Gulch, which ultimately discharge to the South
Platte River.
3.8.2 Water Resources Mitigation
During construction, stormwater impacts will be minimized by using the appropriate CDOT’s
standard construction BMPs. Potential BMPs would include silt fence, inlet protection, stabilized
construction entrances, slope stabilization, concrete washouts, erosion logs, inlet filters,
sediment basins (at permanent water quality pond locations), vehicle tracking pads, and other
BMPs. Specific temporary and permanent stormwater management strategies will be identified
during preliminary/final design as part of a drainage/hydraulics assessment and development of
a storm water management plan (SWMP). Construction-related mitigation measures will be
outlined in the SWMP and will include a detailed set of erosion control plans as part of the
roadway design set.
Three potential locations for permanent water quality ponds were identified near Weir Gulch.
These locations include the northeast corner of the Federal Boulevard/8th Avenue intersection
immediately adjacent to Weir Gulch, the northeastern corner of Barnum North Park immediately
west of the businesses along Federal Boulevard, and the previously vacated Barberry Place
right-of-way. Additional coordination with CCD, CDOT, and the Colorado Department of Public
Health and Environment (CDPHE) Water Quality Control Division is required during preliminary
and final engineering design.
In the vicinity of Lakewood Gulch, a stormwater pollutant removal system (stormceptors or
similar device) have been identified in the Federal Boulevard Bridge over Lakewood Gulch
reconstruction preliminary engineering plans for water quality management in the area. The
Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) PEL project would require the up-sizing of the
stormceptors (or similar device). The stormceptor model currently identified in the Federal
Boulevard Bridge over Lakewood Gulch reconstruction preliminary engineering plans for water
quality management is an STC 450i. The addition of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to
Howard Place) PEL project drainage will require a larger stormceptor model, such as STC 2400
or similar model. Additional coordination with CCD, RTD, CDOT, and the CDPHE Water Quality
Control Division is required during preliminary and final engineering design.
The hydraulics analysis contained in this PEL was based upon preliminary engineering and
certain assumptions were made based on a “worse case” scenario. The final location and
configuration of the BMPs presented, including the permanent water quality ponds, are subject
to change as the project design process progresses. The final location and configuration will be
determined during final engineering design.
A general Construction Dewatering Operations permit must be obtained from the WQCD if
groundwater is discharged from the excavation site to any waters of the State. Numeric water
quality standards and BMPs for dewatering discharges are developed by the WQCD and are
included within the provisions of the general permit. If it is determined that contaminated
groundwater would be encountered during dewatering activities, special materials management
may be required during construction to meet water quality standards.
3.9 Wetlands and Other Waters of the US
Wetlands associated with Weir Gulch and Lakewood Gulch are present in the project area. Weir
Gulch is a jurisdictional Waters of the US (CDOT 2006, CDOT 2007a, RTD 2007). Wetland
resources are protected under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and
Executive Order 11990 Protection of Wetlands (US Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA]
1977). The Clean Water Act requires coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and resource agencies such as the USEPA and the US Department of Interior Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) when impacts occur to wetlands that are considered Waters of
the U.S. The US Department of Transportation Order 5660.1A Preservation of the Nation’s
Wetlands (US Department of Transportation [USDOT] 1978) provides guidance on wetland
mitigation assessment. CDOT has incorporated this and other FHWA environmental guidance
into its Environmental Stewardship Guide (CDOT 2005c), which emphasizes efforts to avoid
and minimize wetland impacts.
3.9.1 Wetlands and Other Waters of the US Impacts
Proposed Action – Wetlands impacts may occur due to the construction of a new stormwater
outfall at Weir Gulch.
At this time, no impacts to wetlands along Lakewood Gulch from the Proposed Action are
expected. Impacts due to bridge construction will be part of the RTD West Corridor FasTracks
LRT project (RTD, 2007).
No-Action Alternative – No impacts would occur as a result of the No-Action Alternative.
3.9.2 Wetlands and Other Waters of the US Mitigation
A wetland delineation, application for a Clean Water Act section 404 permit may be required
based on the design of the stormwater outfall at Weir Gulch.
3.10 Biological Resources
Previous NEPA studies relevant to the project area were reviewed (CDOT, 2006; CDOT, 2007a;
CDOT, 2007b; CDOT, 2008; RTD, 2007) and a field survey of existing biological resources was
performed, including vegetation, noxious weeds, wildlife, special status species, and wetlands.
The results of this review are summarized in a Biological Resources Technical Memorandum
(FHU, 2008) (Appendix C).
3.10.1 Vegetation and Wildlife
Due to the commercial nature of the corridor, natural vegetation is minimal within the project
area, with the exception being the riparian areas surrounding the Lakewood Gulch Trail and
Weir Gulch Trail. Many of the wildlife species that currently use the project area are adapted to
an urban environment and are introduced species commonly associated with human
development. Few studies of wildlife have been conducted in urban area. The parks adjacent to
Federal Boulevard within the project area contain little natural vegetation and include primarily
grasses and ornamental trees. This area has been heavily impacted by development,
industrialization, and recreation activities, as a result, the plant communities and associated
wildlife communities have been altered.
3.10.1.1 Vegetation and Wildlife Impacts
Proposed Action – Minimal or no impacts to vegetation and wildlife will occur due to the
Proposed Action. Riparian vegetation along Weir Gulch will be impacted from installation of the
permanent water quality pond and stormwater outfall.
No-Action Alternative – No impacts to vegetation and wildlife will occur due to the No-Action
Alternative.
Any impacts to riparian vegetation along Lakewood Gulch are expected to be associated with
reconstruction of the Federal Boulevard Bridge due to bridge construction as part of the Federal
Boulevard Bridge Replacement (RTD, 2007).
3.10.1.2 Vegetation and Wildlife Mitigation
Senate Bill 40 certification will likely be required for construction of the permanent water quality
pond and stormwater outfall in Weir Gulch. Projects may receive Individual or Programmatic
certification depending upon the Senate Bill 40 guidelines, which will be determined by the
Colorado Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife (CDOW).
3.10.2 Noxious Weeds
Noxious weeds are present in the vacant, undeveloped portions of the project area near the US
6/Federal Boulevard interchange and Barnum, Barnum North, and Barnum East parks. The
control of noxious weeds is mandated by the Colorado Noxious Weed Act (Title 35, article 5.5).
Noxious weeds are non-native plants that establish themselves in disturbed soils and have the
ability to quickly spread and displace native vegetation and habitat. Previous NEPA studies
relevant to the project area were reviewed to determine the presence of noxious weeds within
the project area. The project area was assessed for noxious weeds listed on the State A, B, and
C lists, the noxious weed list for Denver County, and the CDOT Maintenance Noxious Weed
List. Three species of noxious weeds were identified: field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis),
Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia), and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Table 6 and
Figure 25 identify the noxious weed species present in the project area.
analysis. While impacts can be differentiated by direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts, the
concept of cumulative impacts takes into account all disturbances because cumulative impacts
result in the compounding of the effects of all actions over time. The cumulative impacts of an
action can be viewed as the total effects on a resource, ecosystem, or human community of that
action and all other activities affecting that resource no matter what entity (federal, non-federal,
or private) is taking the action.
Cumulative impact analysis is resource-specific and generally performed for environmental
resources directly impacted by the federal action under study, such as a transportation project.
However, not all of the resources directly impacted by a project require cumulative impact
analysis. Cumulative impact analysis should focus on resources for which the Proposed Action
will have effects similar to other actions in the community study area (Figure 20) and/or
resources that have been historically affected by cumulative actions.
3.13.1 Methodology for Assessing Cumulative Impacts
The methodology for the cumulative impacts analysis is summarized as follows:
Define the geographic limits of the analysis
Define the temporal limits of the analysis
Identify past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions
Determine the resources affected by the actions
Assess the cumulative impacts of the actions
Figure 20 shows the community study area for the cumulative impacts analysis. The community
study area includes neighborhoods adjacent to and near the project area.
The temporal starting point for the analysis is approximately 1940, which is during construction
of 6th Avenue (US 6). The construction of 6th Avenue affected the community study area in
regard to land use. The future horizon year is 2035, which is based on the DRCOG 2035 RTP.
Information and data used for this analysis were based on available resources for the
community study area. The RTD West Corridor LRT project, CDOT I-25 Valley Highway project,
CDOT and CCD Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) project, and RTD Federal
Boulevard Bridge Replacement at Lakewood Gulch project were the primary data sources with
respect to past, present, and proposed future developments, along with information provided by
CCD. Table 7 lists the current and reasonably foreseeable projects that were considered for
cumulative impacts.
Key resources to be considered as part of the cumulative impacts analysis were identified on
the basis of the direct and indirect impacts of the Proposed Action and the potential for impact of
other actions on the resources. The key resources include:
Traffic Operations
Multi-Modal Mobility
Environmental Justice
Air Quality
Noise
Table 7. Current and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions in the Community Study Area
Project Name/Location Description Status
Transportation Projects
West Corridor LRT LRT from Downtown Denver to Golden Current project
US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange Reconstruction of the US 6/Federal Boulevard
Planned future project
(I-25 Valley Highway) interchange
Federal Boulevard from Alameda Avenue Roadway widening; Streetscape improvements; water
th Current project
to 5 Avenue quality pond/wetlands installation in Barnum Park
Federal Boulevard bridge at Lakewood
Bridge replacement and drainage improvements Current project
Gulch
Federal Boulevard/Colfax Avenue
Bridge replacement Planned future project
interchange
Perry Street at Lakewood Gulch Bridge replacement and drainage improvements Recent project
West Colfax Avenue (Federal Boulevard
Sidewalk, pedestrian, and bus stop improvements Planned future project
to Sheridan Boulevard)
Local Agency Facility Projects
Ross-Barnum Branch Denver Public
Library Renovations to the library Recent project
st
3570 West 1 Avenue
Sun Valley Homes Redevelopment of the Denver Housing Authority complex Planned future project
Local Agency Park and Recreational Facility Projects
Barnum North Park Construction a BMX bicycle skills course in park
Planned future project
Irrigation improvements
Redesign and construction of park due to reconstruction
Barnum East Park (I-25 Valley Highway) Planned future project
of the US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange
Rude Recreation Center
Expand and rebuild existing facility Recent project
2855 West Holden Place
Barnum Recreation Center
Improvements to the outdoor pool Recent project
360 Hooker Street
Irrigation improvements and completion of the Weir Gulch
Barnum Park Recent project
bicycle trail
Paco Sanchez Park Irrigation improvements Current project
Lakewood Gulch Trail Surface and structural repair/rehabilitation of trail Current project
Rude Park Restroom rehabilitation Current project
Weir Gulch Marina Park Irrigation improvements Planned future project
Replace existing asphalt trail with concrete trail
New grade separated crossing of US 6
Weir Gulch Trail Extension of trail through the Barnum North Park across Planned future project
th
Federal Boulevard at 8 Avenue to the existing Weir
Gulch bicycle route and ultimately to the South Platte
River Greenway
Private Land Development
Transit Oriented Development – Decatur
Transit oriented development near planned LRT station Possible future project
Street and Knox Court
Table 7. Current and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions in the Community Study Area
(continued)
Project Name/Location Description Status
Local Agency Planning Projects
Evaluate the potential widening of the Federal
CCD Federal Boulevard (Howard Place to
th Boulevard roadway and reconstruction of the Federal Current project
20 Avenue) Concept Study
Boulevard/Colfax Avenue interchange
Create a design vision for each of the major gulch parks
(Weir Gulch, Sanderson Gulch, Harvard Gulch, West
CCD Gulch Master Plan Harvard Gulch, and Lakewood Gulch). Current project
Integrate with the Storm Drainage Master Plan and
Water Quality Management Plan
Establish a long-range vision for land use,
Federal/Decatur LRT Station Area Plan transportation, and community needs in the Current project
Federal/Decatur LRT station area
Establish a long-range vision for West Colfax from
CCD West Colfax Plan Federal Boulevard to Sheridan Street between West Current project
10th Avenue and West 17th Avenue.
Explore solutions to make major urban thoroughfares
Metro Denver Living Streets Initiative Current Project
and their adjacent land more sustainable into the future.
CCD Strategic Parking Plan Comprehensive review of the CCD parking system Current project
Planning initiative to facilitate appropriate transit
CCD Transit Oriented Development Initiative oriented development near current and future LRT Current project
station locations.
CCD New Zoning Code Reform of the existing CCD zoning code Current project
Improve the approach to citywide bicycle and pedestrian
connectivity and access to key destinations, including
CCD Multimodal Access and Connectivity
parks and open spaces, recreation centers, schools, Current project
Plan
neighborhoods, commercial and employment centers,
and transit nodes.
Identify and recommend best management practices,
policy and regulatory tools for Denver to better connect
CCD Downtown Multimodal Access Plan Planned future project
neighborhood, community and regional destinations via
a multi-modal transportation network
Master plan intended to improve pedestrian conditions
CCD Pedestrian Master Plan and increase pedestrian activity, especially in Areas of Recent project
Change
Review of existing stormwater systems and
CCD Storm Drainage Master Plan Recent project
identification of future improvements
Identify locations for water quality enhancements and
CCD Stormwater Quality Master Plan create guidelines by which to enforce enhancement for Recent project
development/redevelopment
1940 to 1950
By 1940, Federal Boulevard between 2nd Avenue and 19th Avenue was mostly developed with
numerous residences, commercial and industrial properties, and the Barnum park complex;
however, the area between Federal Boulevard and the South Platte River included scattered
agricultural or vacant, undeveloped parcels. The area adjacent to the South Platte River
contained primarily industrial, commercial, or agricultural uses, while the residential areas were
located on the alluvial terraces above the river floodplain. The Denver and Intermountain
Railroad, which had been completed in 1891, operated between Union Station in Downtown
Denver and the City of Golden and provided both passenger and freight service. The rail line
traveled from Downtown Denver along the Colfax Avenue viaduct until shifting its alignment to
Lakewood Gulch at Federal Boulevard. The rail line roughly paralleled 12th Avenue.
During World War II, the 6th Avenue Freeway (US 6) was constructed to provide quick auto and
truck access from downtown Denver to the newly-built Remington Arms Ordnance plant in
Lakewood (currently known as the Federal Center).The freeway followed 8th Avenue between
downtown Denver and Federal Boulevard. At Federal Boulevard, the freeway curved to its 6th
Avenue alignment. Construction of the 6th Avenue Freeway not only changed area traffic
patterns but it also bisected the Villa Park and Barnum neighborhoods. West of approximately
Knox Court, the 6th Avenue Freeway project involved the removal of a swath of residences
along its length to the Ordnance plant. The 6th Avenue Freeway provided access for residents to
their jobs at the Ordnance plant, as well as to Downtown Denver.
In addition, a 1.6-mile spur was constructed from the Denver and Intermountain Railroad to the
Remington Arms plant. During World War II, the rail line provided vital transportation for the
munitions being produced at the plant and facilitated development of the rural areas west of
Denver in what is now the City of Lakewood. The railroad provided residents access to jobs,
shopping, markets for their products, and recreational facilities.
By the end of World War II, Federal Boulevard had become a major city thoroughfare. As a
result, the city rezoned the residential and vacant properties along the street, which allowed
these to be developed or redeveloped with intensified commercial uses over the following
decades. In 1948, Bears Stadium (also known as Mile High Stadium) was constructed northeast
of the Federal Boulevard/Colfax Avenue intersection. Traffic along Federal Boulevard began to
increase and the quiet residential character of the thoroughfare went into decline.
1950 to 1970
Passenger service along the Denver and Intermountain Railroad between Downtown Denver
and the City of Golden was discontinued in 1950, and the Denver and Intermountain Railroad
was sold becoming the Associated Railroad. Limited freight service to the Denver Federal
Center continued until the 1980s.
During the 1950s, the Valley Highway (currently I-25) was constructed immediately east of the
community study area and Mile High Stadium underwent one of its first major expansions. The
Federal Boulevard/Colfax Avenue intersection was reconstructed as a grade separated
cloverleaf interchange in the late 1950s. The Sun Valley Homes complex was constructed
southeast of the Decatur Street/Holden Place intersection.
In the early 1960s, the Valley Highway construction was completed, and the portion of 6th
Avenue from Federal Boulevard east to Kalamath Street was also completed as part of the
original Valley Highway project. The US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange was built as part of
the Valley Highway project. Mile High Stadium also experienced another major expansion.
Land use south of Colfax Avenue and between Federal Boulevard and the South Platte River
continued to change with the conversion of the vacant, undeveloped or agricultural parcels to
commercial and industrial uses. The areas north of the Mile High Stadium and west of Federal
Boulevard continued to be primarily residential with primarily commercial and industrial uses
immediately adjacent to Federal Boulevard.
1970 to 1990
Land use change continued with commercial and industrial infill of the parcels along the South
Platte River. In 1973, the area along Lakewood Gulch west of Federal Boulevard was
designated as Paco Sanchez Park, and in 1978, the area along Lakewood Gulch east of
Federal Boulevard was designated as a Rude Park. McNichols Arena was also constructed
near the Mile High Stadium. Mile High Stadium was expanded again in the 1980s. The limited
freight service to the Denver Federal Center along the Associated Railroad line along Lakewood
Gulch was discontinued in 1988.
1990 to Present
Land use in the community study area is stable. The McNichols Arena was demolished in 1999,
and Invesco Field at Mile High was constructed in 2000/2001. Mile High Stadium was
demolished in 2002. The Federal Boulevard/Colfax Avenue interchange was reconfigured with
installation of the bus transfer facility in the northeast quadrant of the interchange adjacent to
Invesco Field at Mile High.
3.13.3 Potential Impacts of Other Current and Reasonably Foreseeable Future
Projects
Table 8 presents the potential impacts of current and reasonably foreseeable future projects on
the key resources identified in Section 3.1.3.1. The impacts identified are those that fall within
the community study area (Figure 20).
The West Corridor LRT line will improve multi-modal connectivity for bicycles, pedestrians, and
motorists along the corridor.
Increased mobility within the West Corridor could result in land use change through increased infill
development, which could result in land use/zoning changes – notably in the areas in close
proximity to the LRT line.
The West Corridor LRT line will result in increased mobility along the West Corridor and throughout
the Denver metropolitan area, which could result in increased availability and access to jobs for
local area residents, including low-income and minority populations. More job opportunities will
lead to a higher standard of living.
The West Corridor LRT line will provide an additional transportation facility for travel between or
within neighborhoods by crossing the major north-south arterials of Sheridan Boulevard, Federal
Boulevard, and I-25, which will improve community cohesion.
The West Corridor LRT line will have an adverse affect to the NRHP-eligible Denver and
Intermountain Railroad rail line.
The West Corridor LRT line will improve stormwater drainage along the LRT line, which could
result in improved water quality.
Construction of the West Corridor LRT line will have short-term, temporary impacts from dust,
noise, sediment, and traffic detours.
US 6/Federal Boulevard The interchange will have beneficial safety improvements and traffic congestion reduction. A
interchange (I-25 Valley decrease in traffic congestion will result in minor, positive air quality effects.
Highway)
A wider, continuous pedestrian zone on both sides of Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to 7th
Avenue will provide greater spacing between pedestrians and the roadway and provide improved
access to the bus stops along Federal Boulevard.
The US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange will result in increased pedestrian, vehicle, and transit
(bus) mobility for travel between or within neighborhoods by crossing the major east-west arterial
of US 6, which will improve community cohesion. Increased multi-modal connectivity will benefit
low-income and minority populations. These populations often have lower levels of car ownership
and tend to be more dependent on transit.
The US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange will improve stormwater drainage in the vicinity of the
interchange, which could result in improved water quality.
Construction of the US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange will have short-term, temporary impacts
from dust, noise, sediment, and traffic detours.
A wider, continuous pedestrian zone on both sides of Federal Boulevard from Alameda Avenue to
th
5 Avenue will provide greater spacing between pedestrians and the roadway and provide
improved access to the bus stops along Federal Boulevard.
The roadway project will result in increased pedestrian, vehicle, and transit (bus) mobility for travel
between or within neighborhoods along the major north-south arterial of Federal Boulevard.
Installation of crosswalk pavement markings and countdown pedestrian signal heads at the
signalized intersections along Federal Boulevard will improve pedestrian safety across Federal
Boulevard, which will improve community cohesion. Increased multi-modal connectivity will benefit
low-income and minority populations. These populations often have lower levels of car ownership
and tend to be more dependent on transit.
The roadway project will improve stormwater drainage in the vicinity of the roadway, which could
result in improved water quality.
Construction of the roadway will have short-term, temporary impacts from dust, noise, sediment,
and traffic detours.
Federal Boulevard bridge at The bridge replacement project will have beneficial pedestrian and vehicle safety improvements.
Lakewood Gulch
th
A wider, continuous pedestrian zone on both sides of Federal Boulevard from 12 Avenue to
Howard Place will provide greater spacing between pedestrians and the roadway, provide
improved pedestrian access to the bus stops along Federal Boulevard, and provide improved
pedestrian access to the planned Federal/Decatur LRT station. Increased multi-modal connectivity
will benefit low-income and minority populations. These populations often have lower levels of car
ownership and tend to be more dependent on transit.
The bridge replacement project will result in increased pedestrian mobility for travel between or
within neighborhoods by crossing the major east-west barrier of Lakewood Gulch, which will
improve community cohesion.
The bridge replacement project will improve stormwater drainage in the vicinity of the bridge, which
could result in improved water quality.
Construction of the bridge will have short-term, temporary impacts from dust, noise, sediment, and
traffic detours.
Federal Boulevard/Colfax The bridge replacement project will have beneficial pedestrian and vehicle safety improvements.
Avenue interchange
A wider, continuous pedestrian zone on both sides of Federal Boulevard across Colfax Avenue will
provide greater spacing between pedestrians and the roadway, and provide improved pedestrian
access to the planned Federal/Decatur LRT station. Increased multi-modal connectivity will benefit
low-income and minority populations. These populations often have lower levels of car ownership
and tend to be more dependent on transit.
The bridge replacement project will improve stormwater drainage in the vicinity of the bridge, which
could result in improved water quality.
Construction of the bridge will have short-term, temporary impacts from dust, noise, sediment, and
traffic detours.
Construction of the bridge had short-term, temporary impacts from dust, noise, sediment, and
traffic detours.
West Colfax Avenue (Federal A wider, continuous pedestrian zone on both sides of Colfax Avenue from Federal Boulevard to
Boulevard to Sheridan Sheridan Boulevard will provide greater spacing between pedestrians and the roadway and
Boulevard) provide improved access to the bus stops along Colfax Avenue.
Construction of the sidewalk, pedestrian, and bus stop improvements will have short-term,
temporary impacts from dust, noise, sediment, and pedestrian detours
Local Agency Facility Projects
Ross-Barnum Branch Denver Renovation of the facility benefitted the local neighborhoods that utilize the facility.
Public Library
st
3570 West 1 Avenue Increased demand has increased traffic.
Sun Valley Homes Redevelopment of the Denver Housing Authority Sun Valley Homes complex into mixed market-
rate and affordable housing will temporarily displace the low-income and minority residents.
Restoration of the street grid system will improve access and motorist, bicycle, and pedestrian
mobility.
Construction of the development will have short-term temporary impacts from dust, noise, and
sediment.
Local Agency Park and Recreational Facility Projects
Barnum North Park Construction of a BMX bicycle skills course will benefit the local neighborhoods that utilize the
facility. Increase bicycle traffic is expected along the Weir Gulch bicycle route and across Federal
th
Boulevard at 8 Avenue to access Barnum North Park.
Increased use of the park will increase bicycle and vehicle traffic.
Construction of the BMX bicycle skills course will have short-term temporary impacts from dust,
noise, and sediment.
Barnum East Park (I-25 Valley Reconstruction of Barnum East Park will benefit the local neighborhoods that utilize the facility and
Highway) the Denver area residents that use the ball fields.
Increased use of the park will increase pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle traffic.
Reconstruction of Barnum East will have short-term temporary impacts from dust, noise, and
sediment.
Rude Recreation Center Expansion of the facility has benefitted the local neighborhoods that utilize the facility, including
2855 West Holden Place low-income and minority populations in the adjacent West Colfax, Villa Park, and Sun Valley
neighborhoods.
Increased use of the recreation center has increased pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle traffic.
Expansion of the facility had short-term temporary impacts from dust, noise, and sediment.
Increased use of the recreation center will increase pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle traffic.
Improvements to the pool will have short-term temporary impacts from dust and noise.
Barnum Park Improvements to the park and extension of the Weir Gulch bicycle trail will benefit the local
neighborhoods that utilize the facility, including low-income and minority populations in the
adjacent Villa Park, Valverde, and Barnum neighborhoods.
Increased use of the park will increase pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle traffic.
Improvements to the park will have short-term temporary impacts from dust and noise.
Paco Sanchez Park Improvements to the park will benefit the local neighborhoods that utilize the facility, including low-
income and minority populations in the adjacent Villa Park, West Colfax, and Sun Valley
neighborhoods.
Improvements to the park will have short-term temporary impacts from dust and noise.
Lakewood Gulch Trail Improvements to the trail will benefit the local neighborhoods that utilize the facility, including low-
income and minority populations in the adjacent Villa Park, West Colfax, and Sun Valley
neighborhoods.
Increased use of the trail will increase pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
Improvements to the park will have short-term temporary impacts from dust and noise.
Rude Park Improvements to the park will benefit the local neighborhoods that utilize the facility, including low-
income and minority populations in the adjacent Villa Park, West Colfax, and Sun Valley
neighborhoods.
Improvements to the park will have short-term temporary impacts from dust and noise.
Weir Gulch Marina Park Improvements to the park will benefit the local neighborhoods that utilize the facility, including low-
income and minority populations in the adjacent Villa Park and Sun Valley neighborhoods.
Improvements to the park will have short-term temporary impacts from dust and noise.
Weir Gulch Trail Improvements to the trail will benefit the local neighborhoods that utilize the facility, including low-
income and minority populations in the adjacent Barnum and Villa Park neighborhoods, as well as
regional bicycle commuters by providing a connection to the South Platte River trail.
Increased use of the trail will increase pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
Improvements to the trail will have short-term, temporary impacts from dust, noise, sediment, and
detours.
Private Land Development
Transit Oriented Development The development will change existing land use and increase economic activity, available
– Decatur Street and Knox residences, jobs, and local availability of goods and services in the vicinity of the Federal/Decatur
Court and Knox Court LRT stations.
The development will have short-term, temporary impacts from dust, noise, sediment, and detours.
timeline of the project be available? Will the property acquisitions be acquired in phases?
How will the property owners be informed? Will the existing RTD bus stop be relocated
onto 7-11 property?
Repair the Federal Boulevard/11th Avenue intersection.
Appreciated the public open house and look forward to receiving additional information
about the project.
Consider widening neighborhood (Villa Park) entry points (10th Avenue and 12th Avenue
west of Federal Boulevard). Bus stops and on-street parking along 10th Avenue and 12th
Avenue cause congestion and do not allow vehicles to pass safely.
Consider some type of coating or using a different material for any vertical surface. Graffiti
is a serious problem in this area.
Ensure that funding is available to maintain landscaped medians.
Require scheduled inspections and maintenance on irrigation systems for proper operation
and water efficiency.
Install pedestrian crossing control at 12th Avenue.
Reduce the road crown. The existing road crown is too high and keeps most drivers in the
center lanes.
The public comments received were utilized as part of the alternative screening process
(Section 2.3) and will be used as a resource for future NEPA documentation. Public comments
regarding items not relevant to the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) PEL have
been forwarded to the appropriate entity, such as CCD Traffic Engineering Services.
In cases where a project is implemented in more than one phase, care must be taken to ensure
that the transportation system operates acceptably at the conclusion of each phase. This is
referred to as “independent utility” – the ability of each phase to operate on its own. Additionally,
it must be demonstrated that air quality conformity will not be jeopardized. Any mitigation
measures needed in response to project impacts must be implemented with the phase in which
the impacts occur, rather than deferred to a later phase.
The establishment of phases for the Proposed Action should meet these criteria:
Independent Utility/Logical Termini – Each phase should have independent utility and
logical termini to the extent that the phase provides a functional transportation system even
in the absence of other phases
Elements of Purpose and Need – Each phase should contribute to meeting the purpose
and need for the entire project
Environmental Impacts – Individual phases should avoid the introduction of substantial
additional environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated
Mitigation Paired with Impacts – Each phase should include appropriate mitigation
measures to match the environmental impacts of that phase
6.0 REFERENCES
City and County of Denver (CCD). 1987. West Colfax Neighborhood Plan. March. Retrieved
November 2008 from
http://www.denvergov.org/Planning_Services/SmallAreaPlans/tabid/428096/Default.aspx.
CCD. 1991. Villa Park Neighborhood Plan. April 29. Retrieved November 2008 from
http://www.denvergov.org/Planning_Services/SmallAreaPlans/tabid/428096/Default.aspx.
CCD. 1995. Federal Boulevard Corridor Plan. February.
CCD. 2000. Denver Comprehensive Plan 2000. Retrieved May 2009 from
http://www.denvergov.org/Default.aspx?alias=www.denvergov.org/CompPlan.
CCD. 2001. Bicycle Master Plan Update. Adopted April 2002. Retrieved November 2008 from
http://www.denvergov.org/Bicycle_Program/BicycleMasterPlanUpdate/tabid/378656/Default.asp
x.
CCD. 2002. Blueprint Denver. Retrieved November 2008 from
http://www.denvergov.org/Default.aspx?alias=www.denvergov.org/Blueprint_Denver.
CCD. 2003a. Game Plan. April. Retrieved November 2008 from
http://www.denvergov.org/parksandrec/Home/GamePlan/tabid/432591/Default.aspx.
CCD. 2003b. Denver Focus Neighborhoods Initiative.
CCD. 2004. Pedestrian Master Plan. August. Retrieved November 2008 from
http://www.denvergov.org/TabId/395511/default.aspx.
CCD. 2006. Denver Bike Map. September. Retrieved December 2008 from
http://www.denvergov.org/Portals/482/documents/BikeMapPage1.pdf.
CCD. 2008a. Denver Strategic Transportation Plan. October. Retrieved November 2008 from
http://www.keepdenvermoving.com/.
CCD. 2008b. Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Colfax Avenue) Conceptual Alignment Study.
April.
Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). 2002. State of Colorado State Highway Access
Code, Volume 2, Code of Colorado Regulations 601-1. March.
CDOT. 2005a. I-25 Valley Highway Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). April.
CDOT. 2005b. CDOT’s Title VI and Environmental Justice Guidelines for National
Environmental Policy Act projects. Rev. 3. May 27.
CDOT. 2005c. Environmental Stewardship Guide.
CDOT. 2006. I-25 Valley Highway Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). November.
CDOT. 2007a. 2035 Statewide Transportation Plan. Retrieved November 2008 from
http://www.dot.state.co.us/StatewidePlanning/PlansStudies/2035Plan.asp.
CDOT. 2007b. Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) Environmental Assessment
(EA). October.
CDOT. 2007c. I-25 Valley Highway Record of Decision (ROD). July.
CDOT. 2008. Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI). February.
CDOT. 2009. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Manual. January.
Colorado Historical Society (CHS) Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP).
1998. Historic Resource Documentation, Standards for Level I, II, and III Documentation. OAHP
Publication #1595, Denver, Colorado. October.
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). 1978. NEPA Regulations. 30 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) § 1500 – 1508. Retrieved July 2008 from
http://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/toc_ceq.htm.
Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG). 2007. 2035 Metro Vision Regional
Transportation Plan. December. Retrieved November 2008 from
http://www.drcog.org/index.cfm?page=RegionalTransportationPlan(RTP).
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 1998. FHWA Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations. Executive Order 6640.23.
FHWA. 2008. Planning & Environmental Linkages Implementation Resource. September.
Retrieved December 2008 from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/pel/index.htm.
Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU). 2008. Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Public
Involvement Program (PIP). October.
FHU. 2009a. Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning Environmental Linkage
Study Safety Assessment Report. June.
FHU. 2009b. Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning Environmental Linkage
Study Traffic Report. June.
FHU. 2009c. Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning Environmental Linkage
Study Preliminary Design Plan Set. June.
FHU. 2009d. Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning Environmental Linkage
Study Environmental Justice Evaluation Technical Report. June.
FHU. 2009e. Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning Environmental Linkage
Study Air Quality Impact Analysis. June.
FHU. 2009f. Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning Environmental Linkage
Study Traffic Noise Impact Analysis. June.
FHU. 2009g. Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning Environmental Linkage
Study Biological Resource Technical Memorandum. June.
FHU. 2009h. Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning Environmental Linkage
Study Modified Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. June.
Colorado Geological Survey (CGS). 1974. Potential Swelling Soil and Rock – The Front Range
Urban Corridor, Colorado. Environmental Geology #7.
Lindvall, R.M., 1978. US Geological Survey Map GQ-1427. Geologic Map of the Fort Logan
Quadrangle, Jefferson, Denver, and Arapahoe Counties.
Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB). 2006. Safety Assessment Report for State Highway 88 (Federal
Boulevard) between Milepost 0.50 and 2.00, from 10th Avenue to Alameda Avenue.
Raup, D.M. 1987. Paleontological Collecting: Committee on Guidelines for Paleontological
Collecting. National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press. Washington D.C.
Regional Transportation District (RTD). 2003a. West Corridor Draft Environmental Impact
Statement. March.
RTD. 2003b. West Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement. October.
RTD. 2004. West Corridor Record of Decision (ROD). April.
RTD. 2007. Draft Federal Boulevard Bridge Replacement Categorical Exclusion. December.
Rocky Mountain Paleontology (RMP). 2003. Paleontology Survey Report for the Valley Highway
(Logan to 8th Avenue) EIS, City and County of Denver, Colorado. Paul C. Murphey. August 10.
Shroba, R.R. 1980. US Geological Survey GQ-1524. Geologic Map and Physical Relief
Properties of the Surficial and Bedrock Units of the Englewood Quadrangle: Denver, Arapahoe,
and Adams Counties, Colorado.
Tatanka Historical Associates (In association with FHU). 2009. Historic Survey. January.
US Census Bureau American FactFinder (US Census). 2000. Data retrieved October 1, 2008 at
website: www.factfinder.census.gov . Data sets utilized included: P20 (SF 3)-Household
language by linguistic isolation; P1 (SF 1)-total population; P7 (SF 1)-race; P8 (SF 1)-Hispanic
or Latino by race; P17 (SF 1)-average household size; P52 (SF 3)-household income in 1999.
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1977. Executive Order 11990. Protection of
Wetlands. May 24.
US Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USFS). 1996. Probable Fossil Yield
Classification. Developed by the Paleontology Center of Excellence and the Region 2 (USFS)
Paleo Initiative.
US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2008. Data retrieved October 1,
2008 at website: http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/affordablehousing/programs/home/
US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2008. Endangered, Threatened,
Proposed and Candidate Species Colorado Counties, February.
US Department of Transportation. 1978. Order 5660.1A Preservation of the Nation’s Wetlands.
Appendix A
Agency Coordination
1
• The Barnum Park complex is located at the US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange, and
the Paco Sanchez and Rude Park complex is located along Lakewood Gulch north of
Holden Place.
• The central office of the Denver Department of Human Services is located at the
southeast corner of Holden Place and Federal Boulevard.
3. Project Description
• The planned cross-section for the Federal Boulevard/Lakewood Gulch bridge consists of
three northbound 11-foot lanes, three southbound 11-foot lanes, a 16-foot wide raised
median, a 2-foot shoulder on the east side, an 11-foot bus bay lane on the west side,
and 10.5-foot sidewalks on both sides of the street.
• The planned cross-section for Federal Boulevard from Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue
consists of three northbound 11-foot lanes, three southbound 11-foot lanes, a 16-foot
wide raised median, and an attached 8-foot side walk on both sides of the street.
• The project would tie in with the planned Federal Boulevard/Lakewood Gulch bridge
improvements to the north and the Federal Boulevard from Alameda Avenue to 5th
Avenue improvements to the south.
4. Previous Studies
• April 2008 - Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Colfax Avenue) Conceptual Alignment
Study
• February 2008 – Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI)
• December 2007 – Federal Boulevard Bridge Replacement Categorical Exclusion
• October 2007 – Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) Environmental
Assessment (EA)
• July 2007 – I-25 Valley Highway Record of Decision (ROD)
• November 2006 – I-25 Valley Highway Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
• April 2005 – I-25 Valley Highway Draft EIS
• April 2004 – West Corridor ROD
• October 2003 – West Corridor Final EIS
• March 2003 – West Corridor Draft EIS
5. Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study
• The project team will prepare a document similar in format to an EA, which will include:
o Chapter 1 – Project background, brief summary of purpose and need, logical
termini, and project objectives
o Chapter 2 – Preferred Alternative and alternatives analysis
o Chapter 3 – Environmental resources, including those dismissed from further
consideration, those carried through, impacts, and mitigation
2
o Chapter 4 – Public involvement and agency coordination
o Chapter 5 – Section 4(f) (if applicable)
6. PEL - Alternatives/Traffic
• Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) prepared a Conceptual Alignment Study in the spring.
• As part of the Conceptual Alignment Study, a windshield survey of potential historic
properties was conducted by Jason Marmor, a staff historian formerly with FHU. Jason
identified potential historic properties along the corridor. The majority of these properties
are on the west side of Federal Boulevard.
• In addition to the potential historic properties, the parcels on the east side of Federal
Boulevard are larger and would result in few right-of-way displacements.
• An early design decision was made to hold the western edge of existing Federal
Boulevard and expand to the east.
• As part of the Conceptual Alignment Study, a larger cross-section (125-foot) was
evaluated. This larger cross-section would have required the acquisition of the majority
of the properties on the east side of Federal Boulevard and would have impacted the
Denver Department of Human Services building.
• A traffic analysis is being conducted for the corridor, and a draft report has been
prepared.
7. PEL – Environmental
• The following environmental resources will be evaluated as part of the PEL:
o Air Quality – A hot spot analysis will be conducted.
o Noise – A noise analysis using the Traffic Noise Model (TNM) will be conducted.
o Hazardous Materials – A Modified Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (MESA)
is being prepared for the corridor. Based on the initial reconnaissance, no “big ticket”
items like Superfund sites are located along the corridor. However, several active
and closed former gas stations are located along the corridor.
o Biological Resources – An Initial Biological Resources Technical Memorandum will
be prepared for the corridor. Depending on the location of the stormwater outfalls,
which is being evaluated, a wetland delineation may be necessary.
o Archaeology and Paleontology – Previous studies in the corridor will be utilized.
o Historic Resources – A historic survey is underway and being conducted by Ron
Sladek, who conducted the historic survey for the Federal Boulevard (Alameda
Avenue to 5th Avenue) EA. The draft survey is expected mid-December.
o Environmental Justice – An Environmental Justice Evaluation is being prepared.
o No Section 4(f) impacts are expected at this time, although this may change
depending on the results of the historic survey and Section 106 process.
8. Public Involvement
3
• One-on-one door to door meetings with the businesses along Federal Boulevard from 5th
Avenue to Holden Place
• Small group meetings with the local neighborhood associations and non-profit
organizations, which include: Metropolitan Organization for the People, Villa Park
Neighborhood Association, Sun Valley Community Association, etc.
• A single, corridor-wide public meeting with a mass postcard mailing notification
o The project team will coordinate with the Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to
5th Avenue) project team to evaluate a possible co-located public meeting.
9. Agency Coordination
• Hold individual one-on-one meetings with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO)
and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Water Quality
Control Division
• Will invite other resource agencies (US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
[USFWS], Colorado Division of Wildlife [CDOW], and US Army Corps of Engineers
[USACE]) to participate
o Scoping invite letters will be from Crissy Fanganello (Karen Good)’s office
• A project management team will be developed consisting of Denver, CDOT, and Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) representatives
o Meetings will be held monthly on the last Tuesday from 2:30 to 3:30 following the
Federal Boulevard Coordination Meeting
10. Categorical Exclusion (5th Avenue to 7th Avenue)
• A CDOT CatEx Form 128 and the FHWA non-programmatic CatEx form will be prepared
based on the information collected for the PEL with a cover memorandum identifying any
specific information. This will be submitted to CDOT for review, who will then submit to
FHWA.
11. Next Steps
• An intergovernmental agreement (IGA) is being prepared by CDOT for Denver regarding
CDOT oversight.
• A draft purpose and need will be prepared and submitted to the project management
team for review.
• A logical termini white paper is being prepared for the 5th Avenue to 7th Avenue
component.
• If the CatEx for the Federal Boulevard Bridge over Lakewood Gulch does not address
capacity, the northern terminus of the PEL should be extended to Howard Place from
Holden Place.
o NOTE: Following the kick-off meeting, CDOT verified that the CatEx had not been
approved for the Federal Boulevard Bridge over Lakewood Gulch.
4
Attachment A
Meeting Sign-In Sheets
5
Attachment B
Meeting Handouts
7
Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Holden Place)
Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study
Welcome
Introductions
Project Overview
o Project Description
o Project Area
Previous Studies
o April 2008 - Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Colfax Avenue) Conceptual Alignment
Study
o February 2008 – Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI)
o December 2007 – Federal Boulevard Bridge Replacement Categorical Exclusion
o October 2007 – Federal Boulevard (Alameda Avenue to 5th Avenue) Environmental
Assessment (EA)
o July 2007 – I-25 Valley Highway Record of Decision (ROD)
o November 2006 – I-25 Valley Highway Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
o April 2005 – I-25 Valley Highway Draft EIS
o April 2004 – West Corridor ROD
o October 2003 – West Corridor Final EIS
o March 2003 – West Corridor Draft EIS
o Alternatives
o Traffic
o Environmental
Public Involvement
Agency Coordination
Next Steps
1
survey, additional site forms that are being prepared by Tatanka Historical
Associates Inc. (THAI), and the APE/Eligibility Determination letter.
• Following the project kick-off meeting, CCD identified that the CDOT contact for the
Lakewood Gulch bridge and the Regional Transportation District (RTD) needed to be
contacted regarding the West Corridor improvements.
o The Lakewood Gulch bridge appears to be going to construction this summer. A
Categorical Exclusion for the third northbound lane across the bridge should be
prepared prior. The status of the draft Categorical Exclusion for the bridge
replacement is unknown.
CDOT will follow-up with staff to identify the status of the Categorical
Exclusion for the bridge replacement.
o Stormceptors have been identified in the Lakewood Gulch bridge preliminary
plans for water quality management in the area. The Federal Boulevard (5th
Avenue to Howard Place) PEL project would require the up-sizing of the
stormceptors.
FHU is investigating the needed Stormceptor cost and size. These will be
provided to CCD and CDOT to communicate to the Lakewood Gulch
bridge team.
3. Technical Reports
• CDOT is reviewing the following technical reports submitted for review on January 27,
2009.
o Intensive Level Survey of Historic Buildings
o Air Quality Assessment
o Traffic Noise Impact Analysis
o Modified Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
o Biological Resources Technical Memorandum
o Environmental Justice Evaluation Technical Memorandum
o Traffic Report
o Safety Assessment
o Preliminary Design Plan Set
• The property at 880 Federal Boulevard should be identified as a full acquisition because
the loss of parking may result in an unviable parcel.
o CCD will provide previous comments on the right-of-way acquisition assumptions
and whether the partial acquisitions should be identified as full acquisitions.
• A draft Chapter 2 Alternatives will be submitted to CDOT and FHWA for review prior to
the public meeting, so the alternative screening process can be reviewed.
4. Public Involvement
• Door-to-Door Business Outreach
o Tentatively scheduled for the Week of February 23rd
o Verify the number of tenants
2
o Villa Park NA – February 25
o Northwest Neighborhood Coalition – Declined Meeting
o Valverde NA – Potentially Week of March 23rd
o Sun Valley NA – February 26
o Federal Boulevard Corridor Improvement Partnership - Waiting for response
o Denver Hispanic Chamber of Commerce - Waiting for response
o Concerned Citizens of Barnum – Waiting for response
3
Attachment A
Meeting Sign-In Sheets
4
MEETING MINUTES
th
Federal Boulevard (5 Avenue to Howard Place) – Planning Environmental Linkage Study
1
o Conducted to verify current Proposed Action that holds the western ROW
boundary and expands the Federal Boulevard roadway to the east
o Used a 103 feet (ft) cross-section (same as Proposed Action) but held eastern
ROW boundary and expanded the Federal Boulevard roadway to the west
o Would have 25 full ROW acquisitions and five partial ROW acquisitions.
o Verified the Proposed Action would have fewer ROW acquisitions.
o Maintained the alignment of the Proposed Action
o A technical memorandum was prepared for the project file.
• Potential center alignment and associated ROW impacts
o Conducted to verify current Proposed Action that holds the western ROW
boundary and expands the Federal Boulevard roadway to the east
o Used a 103 feet (ft) cross-section (same as Proposed Action) and expanded the
Federal Boulevard roadway equally to the east and west.
o Would have 22 full ROW acquisitions and 23 partial ROW acquisitions.
o Verified the Proposed Action would have fewer ROW acquisitions.
o Maintained the alignment of the Proposed Action
o A technical memorandum was prepared for the project file.
• Use of horizontal curves at 10th Avenue
o Conducted in response to comments received at the small group meeting with
the Sun Valley Neighborhood Association
o Used a 103 feet (ft) cross-section (same as Proposed Action) with a horizontal
curve at 10th Avenue that avoids the Family Dollar store at the southeast corner
of the Federal Boulevard/10th Avenue intersection
o Avoids Family Dollar but requires an additional seven full ROW acquisitions and
four partial ROW acquisitions
o Verified the Proposed Action would have fewer right-of-way acquisitions.
o Maintained the alignment of the Proposed Action
o A technical memorandum was prepared for the project file.
5. Hydrology/Hydraulic Engineering
• Water Quality Ponds/Best Management Practices (BMPs)
o Lakewood Gulch – FasTracks
Proposed RTD stormceptor is an STC 450i
Federal Blvd improvements require an STC 2400
Cost for materials and delivery is $8k & $20.5k respectively
o Weir Gulch potential locations
West side - Barnum North park location
2
East side - Barberry vacated ROW
Adjacent to north side of 8th Avenue (east of Federal Blvd)
6. Public Involvement
• Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) – Public Meeting
o Scheduled for April 22nd
o Location: Eagleton Elementary School
o A postcard notification is being prepared and will be mailed to the adjacent
neighborhoods in April 2009.
• Door-to-Door Business Outreach
o Tentatively scheduled for March 19th and March 24th
o Questions related to right-of-way will be directed to Steve Wirth at CCD and the
April 2009 public meeting
• Business/Neighborhood Group Outreach
o Northwest Neighborhood Coalition – Declined Meeting
o Villa Park NA – February 25
o Sun Valley NA – February 26
o Valverde NA – March 23
o Concerned Citizens for Barnum – April 14
o Federal Boulevard Corridor Improvement Partnership – No Response
o Denver Hispanic Chamber of Commerce – No Response
7. Categorical Exclusion - 5th Avenue to 7th Avenue
• Will be based on the technical reports submitted for review in January 2009.
8. Project Schedule and Next Steps
• Federal PMT Meeting April 9th – 10 am @ FHU office
3
Attachment A
Meeting Sign-In Sheets
4
MEETING MINUTES
th
Federal Boulevard (5 Avenue to Howard Place) – Planning Environmental Linkage Study
1
• Direct right-of-way impacts
o Types of Businesses Affected – Handout Provided
Full right-of-way acquisitions will impact a car wash, two auto repair, and
three retail businesses.
o Findings of Door-to-Door Outreach – Handout Provided
Two of the seven businesses are operated by corporations, two Caucasians,
one Hispanic, and two Asians
o Regional vs community focus – Results of neighborhood/small group outreach
Based on feedback from the Villa Park and Sun Valley Neighborhood
Associations, the only business identified as a neighborhood resource is the
Family Dollar store at 990 Federal Boulevard, which services as a grocery
store for the neighborhood by providing non-perishable items.
o Long-range planning for Federal Boulevard/Decatur Street LRT station area
The planning for the Federal Boulevard/Decatur Street LRT station area has
re-started and will include the need for a grocery store.
• Right-of-way Process and Additional Mitigation
o Community Benefits
o Community Facilities
o Improved sidewalks
o Pedestrian/bicyclist safety
o Connection to planned Federal Boulevard/Decatur Street LRT station area
o Connection from Federal Boulevard/8th Avenue intersection to Weir Gulch bicycle
trail
o Eastern alignment – minimize impacts to Villa Park neighborhood
• Finding
o A discussion on disproportionate impact will not be included due to the uncertain
timeframe of the project and the potential to change over time.
2
Attachment A
Meeting Sign-In Sheets
3
MEETING MINUTES
th
Federal Boulevard (5 Avenue to Howard Place) – Planning Environmental Linkage Study
1
Approach to Federal at 8th Avenue from the west need more lighting, signs, and
better striping.
Stressed how dangerous Federal Boulevard is to cross.
7-11 is a partial acquisition?
How will public be notified of funding?
When will timeline for project completion be developed?
Will property acquisitions happen in phases?
How will be notified of property acquisition?
What will happen to the RTD bus stop in front of 7-11?
Federal/11th Avenue is a dangerous intersection and needs to be repaired
2. Draft PEL Study
• Currently under review by CCD
• Submit draft to CDOT and FHWA on June 10, 2009
• Receive CDOT and FHWA comments by July 1, 2009
3. Categorical Exclusion - 5th Avenue to 7th Avenue
• Submit technical memorandum, CDOT Form 128, and FHWA Non-Programmatic Form
on June 10, 2009.
• A separate CatEx is being prepared by CDOT for right-of-acquisition of the property at
690 Federal Boulevard.
4. Project Schedule and Next Steps
• Federal PMT Meeting July 9th – 10 am @ FHU office
2
Attachment A
Meeting Sign-In Sheets
3
Attachment B
Meeting Handouts
5
January 26, 2009
The City and County of Denver (CCD), in cooperation with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT),
is preparing a Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study to evaluate
transportation improvements along Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to
Howard Place in Denver, Colorado. FHWA defines PEL as a voluntary approach
to transportation decision-making that considers environmental, community, and
economic goals early in the planning stage and carries them through project
development, design, and construction. The PEL Study will include the
preparation of a project purpose and need, analysis of alternatives and their
environmental impacts, and coordination with federal, state, and local agencies
and public involvement.
Sincerely,
The City and County of Denver (CCD), in cooperation with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT),
is preparing a Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study to evaluate
transportation improvements along Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to
Howard Place in Denver, Colorado. FHWA defines PEL as a voluntary approach
to transportation decision-making that considers environmental, community, and
economic goals early in the planning stage and carries them through project
development, design, and construction. The PEL Study will include the
preparation of a project purpose and need, analysis of alternatives and their
environmental impacts, and coordination with federal, state, and local agencies
and public involvement.
Sincerely,
The City and County of Denver (CCD), in cooperation with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT),
is preparing a Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study to evaluate
transportation improvements along Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to
Howard Place in Denver, Colorado. FHWA defines PEL as a voluntary approach
to transportation decision-making that considers environmental, community, and
economic goals early in the planning stage and carries them through project
development, design, and construction. The PEL Study will include the
preparation of a project purpose and need, analysis of alternatives and their
environmental impacts, and coordination with federal, state, and local agencies
and public involvement.
Sincerely,
Appendix B
Public Involvement
Karen Good
City and County of Denver
720-865-3162
karen.good@denvergov.org
Lo invitamos a asistir a una Sesión abierta a todo el público para enterarse un poco más sobre el Estudio (PEL)
de Vínculos del Entorno de Planificación de Federal Boulevard, desde la 5th Avenue hasta Howard Place.
Necesitamos su colaboración…
…para encontrar las mejores soluciones para aliviar la congestión de tránsito y mejorar la seguridad
…para mejorar la movilidad del tránsito, peatones y bicicletas
…para mejorar la calidad de vida de los residentes, propietarios de negocios y clientes
…para conservar el entorno local
Si desea más información con respecto a este proyecto, por favor comuníquese con:
Karen Good
Ciudad y Condado de Denver
720-865-3162
karen.good@denvergov.org
You are invited to attend a Public Open House to learn more about the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard
Place) Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
Karen Good
City and County of Denver
720-865-3162
karen.good@denvergov.org
Sun Valley Coalition
Lo invitamos a asistir a una Sesión abierta a todo el público para enterarse un poco más sobre el Estudio (PEL)
de Vínculos del Entorno de Planificación de Federal Boulevard, desde la 5th Avenue hasta Howard Place.
Necesitamos su colaboración…
…para encontrar las mejores soluciones para aliviar la congestión de tránsito y mejorar la seguridad
…para mejorar la movilidad del tránsito, peatones y bicicletas
…para mejorar la calidad de vida de los residentes, propietarios de negocios y clientes
…para conservar el entorno local
Si desea más información con respecto a este proyecto, por favor comuníquese con:
Karen Good
Ciudad y Condado de Denver
720-865-3162
karen.good@denvergov.org
October 2009
Appendix C
Biological Resources Technical Memorandum
Introduction
This technical memorandum is prepared in support of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue
to Howard Place) Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) study. The PEL is intended to
provide the framework for the long-term implementation of the Proposed Action as
funding is available and to be used as a resource for future NEPA documentation, such
as the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion (CatEx) or a series of CatExs. The
technical reports prepared for this PEL are intended for use in support of future NEPA
documentation with minimal re-evaluation of resources and impacts.
Preliminary engineering plans for the Proposed Action are included in the Preliminary
Design Plan Set (FHU, 2009c). The Proposed Action consists of the following elements:
Federal Boulevard roadway alignment and improvements
• Conversion of the northbound Federal Boulevard auxiliary lane from 5th
Avenue to eastbound US 6, which is planned as part of the I-25 Valley
Highway project, to a northbound through lane
• Restriping of the Federal Boulevard bridge over US 6, which will be
reconstructed as part of the I-25 Valley Highway project, with an additional
northbound through lane
• Construction of three 11-ft southbound through lanes, three 11-ft northbound
through lanes, and a 16-ft raised median with a left turn lane at intersections
on Federal Boulevard from US 6 to approximately 12th Avenue
• Widening of Federal Boulevard from the right-of-way boundary line on the
west side of Federal Boulevard toward the east between US 6 and
approximately 12th Avenue with an additional northbound lane
Biological Resources Technical Memorandum
Project File
June 10, 2009
Page 2 of 15
Project File
June 10, 2009
Page 3 of 15
Existing Conditions
The surrounding land use along Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue to Howard Place is
presented in Figure 1 and is predominantly commercial development with a few single-
family residences. The existing urban landscape contains small areas of irrigated and
non-irrigated lawn, shrubs and trees associated with commercial businesses and single-
family residences.
Open space adjacent to the project area includes five nearby city parks:
Barnum Park: Barnum Park is located to the west of Federal Boulevard and south of 6th
Avenue (US 6). Barnum Park is the only area with natural habitat remaining; however,
Barnum Park is outside of the project area and will not be impacted by the project.
Barnum North Park: Barnum North Park is located north of 6th Avenue and west of
Federal Boulevard. This 13.6-acre park provides facilities for soccer and softball and is
equipped with lights for night softball games (CDOT 2006). The I-25 Valley highway EIS
discusses impacts to Barnum North Park due to the construction of the US 6/Federal
Boulevard interchange (CDOT 2006).
Barnum East Park: Barnum East Park is south of 6th Avenue and east of Federal
Boulevard. Barnum East Park includes a ball field and contains approximately 13
ornamental trees that are located in a line running north-south between Federal
Boulevard and the ball field fence (Appendix A). The I-25 Valley Highway EIS and ROD
(CDOT 2006, CDOT 2007a) discusses mitigation to Barnum East Park as part of
improvements to the US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange.
Paco Sanchez Park: Paco Sanchez Park is located to the west of Federal Boulevard
and south of Howard Place.
Rude Park: Rude Park is located east of Federal Boulevard and south of Howard Place.
The Draft Federal Boulevard Bridge Replacement CatEx discusses impacts to these
parks (Paco Sanchez Park and Rude Park) due to reconstruction of the Federal
Boulevard Bridge (RTD 2007). The remaining vegetation within the project area consists
of a few Russian olive and Siberian elm trees located in the right-of-way next to the
bridge that is part of the US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange (CDOT 2006, CDOT
2007a) and along Weir Gulch east of Federal Boulevard.
Biological Resources Technical Memorandum
The USFWS states that actions that result in new water depletions to the Platte River
System may affect listed species downstream as well as designated critical habitat for
whooping crane, least tern, piping plover, and pallid sturgeon in Nebraska. Listed
species impacted only by water depletions of the Platte River are identified by an
asterisk (*). No water-depleting actions would occur from the proposed project.
Additionally the whooping crane, least tern, piping plover, and pallid sturgeon do not
occur in the City and County of Denver and the project area completely lacks any
potential habitat to support these species.
A block clearance zone is an area that is exempted from assessment and trapping
requirements for a listed species under the Endangered Species Act because studies
have shown that the species or adequate habitat for the species does not exist. The
project area is within the block clearance zones for the Preble’s meadow jumping mouse
(Zapus hudsonius preblei), which was not included on the USFWS list because the
project area is in a block clearance zone for this specie. Since there would be no water
depletions associated with this project and because there are no plover or pallid
sturgeon, or potential habitat for these species in the project area, these species are not
addressed further. Species with potential habitat in the project area are discussed below.
Biological Resources Technical Memorandum
The project area includes two water features, Weir Gulch and Lakewood Gulch. Weir
Gulch is completely piped underground in the project area. The outfalls of the potential
water quality ponds could impact Weir Gulch when it is daylighted. According to USFWS
(1992), Weir Gulch does not warrant a ULTO survey because the slopes surrounding the
gulch are very steep and consist of buried rip-rap. (See Appendix A)
The only activities at Lakewood Gulch consist of the non-ground disturbing activity of
bridge restriping. The actual bridge replacement actions and any potential impacts at
Lakewood Gulch are addressed in the Draft Categorical Exclusion: Federal Boulevard
Bridge Replacement (RTD 2007).
Based on the project description, location, and lack of suitable habitat, there are no listed
species within the project area (RTD 2007, CDOT 2007b).
Migratory Birds
The federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended, provides for the protection
of migratory birds, including their nests and eggs. As a result, the potential impacts of
construction on the tree and shrub habitat adjoining the project area has been
considered. After a field survey conducted August 25th, 2008, it is evident there are no
potential nesting trees or potential nesting habitat within the immediate vicinity (CDOT
2007b).
The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934, as amended, is a federal law that
requires consultation with the US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) to prevent loss of and damage to wildlife resources for projects that may
impound, divert, control, or otherwise modify the waters of any stream or water body.
The potential effects to wildlife resources were evaluated for the project to be compliant
with this requirement, as there is no suitable habitat in the project area (CDOT 2007b).
Wetlands
Weir Gulch crosses Federal Boulevard near 8th Avenue, is piped underground half a
block east and west of Federal Boulevard, connects to the South Platte River, and drains
into Barnum Lake to the west of the project area. Weir Gulch is considered a
jurisdictional waters of the US as stated in the I-25 Valley Highway EIS (CDOT 2006,
CDOT 2007a). East of Federal Boulevard, Weir Gulch has been heavily modified with
rip-rap on both sides of the banks (Appendix A).
Three potential locations for permanent water quality ponds were identified near Weir
Gulch. These locations include the northeast corner of the Federal Boulevard/8th Avenue
previously vacated Barberry Place right-of-way. The final location and configuration of
the water quality ponds will be determined during the final engineering design phase of
the project. Additional coordination with CCD, CDOT, and the Colorado Department of
Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Water Quality Control Division is required
during preliminary and final engineering design. Depending upon the placement of a
storm water outfall from these water quality ponds, a wetland delineation, Clean Water
Act Section 404 permit, and Senate Bill (SB) 40 Certification from the Colorado Division
of Wildlife (CDOW) may be necessary for Weir Gulch during preliminary and final
engineering design. Figure 2 identifies the potential areas for placement of the water
quality ponds.
There are four wetland areas located near the Federal Boulevard Bridge (RTD 2007)
over Lakewood Gulch. All four wetlands are narrow emergent wetland bands located
along the banks of Lakewood Gulch with vegetation including cattail, rush, and sedge
species. Temporary impacts to these wetlands associated with bridge construction will
occur and will be covered under an overall Clean Water Act Section 404 permit for the
RTD West Corridor FasTracks LRT project (RTD 2007). At this time, no impacts to
wetlands along Lakewood Gulch from the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard
Place) projects are expected to occur.
Farmlands
The Farmland Protection Act of 1981 protects prime farmland and unique farmland.
There is no farmland located in or near the project area (CDOT 2006, CDOT 2007a,
CDOT 2007b, CDOT 2008, RTD 2007). Therefore no unique or prime farmland will be
affected by the project.
Noxious Weeds
The project area for the proposed lane widening is predominantly urban hardscape with
scattered areas of unmaintained right-of-way and undeveloped adjacent properties.
Noxious weeds are found in the right-of-way of the US 6/Federal Boulevard interchange.
Three weed species were found that are listed in both the CDOT List and the Colorado
State Noxious Weed List as shown in Table 1. None of these species is listed on the
Denver County Weed List. These three species of noxious weeds are: field bindweed
(Convolvulus arvensis), Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia), and downy brome
(Bromus tectorum). None of the weed species identified within the project area are found
on the Colorado State “A” list as being one of the most invasive species (CDOT 2007b,
CDOT 2008, RTD 2007). Figure 3 identifies where these noxious weeds are primarily
found. Individual weeds were also identified growing out of cracks in parking lots and in
sidewalks intermittently throughout the project area. The areas closest to US 6 had a
mixture of all three species, while the area adjacent to Barnum North Park had a mixture
of both field bindweed and downy brome.
Biological Resources Technical Memorandum
CONCLUSION
Previous NEPA studies in the project area were reviewed (CDOT 2006, CDOT 2007a,
CDOT 2007b, CDOT 2008, RTD 2007), and a field survey of existing biological
resources was performed by Keith Hidalgo, an Environmental Scientist with FHU, on
August 25, 2008. There were no potential migratory bird nesting, threatened and
endangered species habitat, or prime or unique farmland identified within the project
area.
Depending upon the location of the permanent water quality BMPs, a wetland
delineation, Clean Water Act Section 404 permit, and Senate Bill (SB) 40 Certification
from the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) may be necessary for Weir Gulch.
Noxious weeds are located within the project area and will be managed during
construction in accordance with the recommended control measures in Table 1.
Colorado State
Common CDOT Recommended Control
Botanical Name Noxious Weed List
Name Weed List Measures
A, B, or C
Minimize disturbances and
enhance desirable species as
Downy brome
Bromus tectorum C competition. Apply a herbicide in
(Cheatgrass)
springtime and seeding of
desirable species in the fall.
Mechanical control by cultivation,
grubbing or covering; herbicides
Field Convolvulus
X C during flowering stage, in the fall,
bindweed arvensis
or after precipitation when
actively growing.
REFERENCES
Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). 2005. I-25 Valley Highway – Logan to
6th Avenue Draft Environmental Impact Statement. April.
CDOT. 2006. I-25 Valley Highway – Logan to 6th Avenue Final Environmental Impact
Statement. November.
CDOT. 2007a. I-25 Valley Highway – Logan St to 6th Avenue Record of Decision. July.
RTD. 2004. West Corridor Light Rail Project Record of Decision, April.
United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1992. Interim Survey Requirements for
Ute Ladies’-Tresses Orchid (Spiranthes diluvialis), November 23.
USFWS. 2004a. Letter to Jeff Peterson of CDOT, as part of the Agency Coordination for
the Valley Highway EIS, May 6.
APPENDIX A
Appendix D
FHWA Colorado Division Planning/Environmental Linkages
Questionnaire
This questionnaire is intended to act as a summary of the Planning process and ease the transition from
the planning study to a NEPA analysis. Often, there is no overlap in personnel between the planning and
NEPA phases of a project, and much (or all) of the history of decisions, etc, is lost. Different planning
processes take projects through analysis at different levels of detail. Without knowing how far, or in how
much detail a planning study went, NEPA project teams often re-do work that has already been done.
Planning teams need to be cautious during the alternative screen process; alternative screening should
focus on purpose and need/corridor vision, fatal flaw analysis and possibly mode selection. This may
help minimize problems during discussions with resource agencies. Alternatives that have fatal flaws or
do not meet the purpose and need/corridor vision cannot be considered viable alternatives, even if they
reduce impacts to a particular resource. This questionnaire is consistent with the 23 CFR 450 (Planning
regulations) and other FHWA policy on Planning and Environmental Linkage process.
Instructions: These questions should be used as a guide throughout the planning process, not just
answered near completion of the process. When a PEL study is started, this questionnaire will be given
to the project team. Some of the basic questions to consider are: “What did you do?”, “What didn’t you
do?” and “Why?”. When the team submits a PEL study to FHWA for review, the completed
questionnaire will be included with the submittal. FHWA will use this questionnaire to assist in
determining if an effective PEL process has been applied before NEPA processes are authorized to begin.
The questionnaire should be included in the planning document as an executive summary, chapter, or
appendix.
1. Background:
a. What is the name of the PEL document and other identifying project information (e.g.
sub-account or STIP numbers)?
b. Provide a brief chronology of the planning activities (PEL study) including the year(s)
the studies were conducted.
The project area extends along Federal Boulevard from 5th Avenue in the south
to approximately Howard Place in the north (Figure 2). East-west boundaries
include the alley between Federal Boulevard and Grove Street to the west and
portions of the first row of parcels immediately adjacent to Federal Boulevard to
the east, which are not uniformly shaped.
From 5th Avenue to 10th Avenue, the existing roadway cross-section consists of
two northbound lanes, three southbound lanes, and a center-turn lane. The
d. Who was the sponsor of the PEL study? (CDOT, Local Agency, Other)
e. Who was included on the study team (Name and title of agency representatives,
consultants, etc.)?
f. Are there recent, current or near future planning studies or projects in the vicinity? What
is the relationship of this project to those studies/projects?
Yes, refer to Section 1.7 and 1.8 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard
Place) Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study for a discussion on the
planning context and other transportation projects in the vicinity of the project.
2. Methodology used:
a. Did you use NEPA-like language? Why or why not?
Yes, we used NEPA-like language to to provide the framework for the long-term
implementation of the Proposed Action as funding is available and to be used as
a resource for future NEPA documentation, such as the preparation of a
Categorical Exclusion (CatEx) or a series of CatExs.
b. What were the actual terms used and how did you define them? (Provide examples or
list)
These terms will be used in NEPA documents in the same fashion as they were
used in the PEL study.
d. What were the key steps and coordination points in the PEL decision-making process?
Who were the decision-makers and who else participated in those key steps? For
example, for the corridor vision, the decision was made by CDOT and the local agency,
with buy-in from FHWA, the Corps, and USFWS.
This PEL is intended to provide the framework for the long-term implementation
of the Proposed Action as funding is available and to be used as a resource for
future NEPA documentation, such as the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion
(CatEx) or a series of CatExs.
3. Agency coordination:
a. Provide a synopsis of coordination with federal, tribal, state and local environmental,
regulatory and resource agencies. Describe their level of participation and how you
coordinated with them.
Refer to Section 4.1 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place)
Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
b. What transportation agencies (e.g. for adjacent jurisdictions) did you coordinate with or
were involved in the PEL study?
Refer to Section 4.1 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place)
Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
c. What steps will need to be taken with each agency during NEPA scoping?
The steps to be taken will depend on the type of future NEPA documentation
prepared for the project, such as the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion
(CatEx) or a series of CatExs.
4. Public coordination:
a. Provide a synopsis of your coordination efforts with the public and stakeholders.
Refer to Section 4.2 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place)
Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
Refer to Sections 1.3 and 1.4 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard
Place) Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
Refer to Sections 1.3 and 1.4 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard
Place) Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
b. What steps will need to be taken during the NEPA process to make this a project-level
purpose and need statement?
b. How did you select the screening criteria and screening process?
c. For alternative(s) that were screened out, briefly summarize the reasons for eliminating
the alternative(s). (During the initial screenings, this generally will focus on fatal flaws)
The Proposed Action should be brought forward into NEPA. Refer to Chapter 2
of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning Environmental
Linkage (PEL) Study for further explanation.
e. Did the public, stakeholders, and agencies have an opportunity to comment during this
process?
Yes, refer to Section 4.2 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place)
Planning Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
f. Were there unresolved issues with the public, stakeholders and/or agencies?
Displacement of the Family Dollar store at 990 Federal Boulevard was not
resolved. The Family Dollar store was identified by the Sun Valley neighborhood
as providing goods and services to the neighborhood. This retail business
located at 990 Federal Boulevard is corporate-owned. Relocation to another area
would result in the loss goods and services to the pedestrian-dependent patrons
from the Sun Valley and Villa Park neighborhoods. Patrons would have to obtain
the same type of services somewhere else, which may be a further distance
away from the Community Study Area and therefore less convenient.
Year 2035.
c. Are the planning assumptions and the corridor vision/purpose and need statement
consistent with the long-range transportation plan?
d. What were the future year policy and/or data assumptions used in the transportation
planning process related to land use, economic development, transportation costs and
network expansion?
8. Resources (wetlands, cultural, etc.) reviewed. For each resource or group of resources reviewed,
provide the following:
a. In the PEL study, at what level of detail was the resource reviewed and what was the
method of review?
Refer to Chapter 3 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning
Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
b. Is this resource present in the area and what is the existing environmental condition for
this resource?
Refer to Chapter 3 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning
Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
c. What are the issues that need to be considered during NEPA, including potential resource
impacts and potential mitigation requirements (if known)?
Refer to Chapter 3 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning
Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
9. List resources that were not reviewed in the PEL study and why? Indicate whether or not they
will need to be reviewed in NEPA and explain why.
Refer to Chapter 3 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning
Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
10. Were cumulative impacts considered in the PEL study? If yes, provide the information or
reference where it can be found.
11. Describe any mitigation strategies discussed at the planning level that should be analyzed during
NEPA.
Refer to Chapter 3 of the Federal Boulevard (5th Avenue to Howard Place) Planning
Environmental Linkage (PEL) Study.
12. What needs to be done during NEPA to make information from the PEL study available to the
agencies and the public? Are there PEL study products which can be used or provided to
agencies or the public during the NEPA scoping process?
This PEL study was intended to provide the framework for the long-term implementation of
the Proposed Action as funding is available and to be used as a resource for future NEPA
documentation, such as the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion (CatEx) or a series of
CatExs. The technical reports prepared for this PEL are intended for use in support of future
NEPA documentation with minimal re-evaluation of resources and impacts.
13. Are there any other issues a future project team should be aware of?
a. Examples: Utility problems, access or ROW issues, encroachments into ROW,
problematic land owners and/or groups, contact information for stakeholders, special or
unique resources in the area, etc.
None identified.