Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Early Development and Parenting, Vol.

1 (2), 121-126 (1992)


~~~ ~

me Parental Attitude Research


Instrument: an Approach to Use
of Attitude Questionnaires
Warren R. Stanton* and Phil A. Silva
Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Research Unit, University
ofOtago Medical School, P.O. Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand

Parental attitude questionnaires such as the Parental Attitude


Research Instrument (PARI) are still in use despite their inherent
difficulties. In light of the need to test theoretical models by
measuring a range of parental characteristics, the properties of the
PARI were re-examined and, on the basis of a factor analysis of the
23 subtests of the PARI, a shortened version was constructed. A
measure of maternal Authoritarian Control, which was found to be
associated with measures of maternal mental ability, personality,
level of education, reading age, number of adverse family
conditions and child-rearing practices, has proved useful for other
projects related to this ongoing study. It is recommended that such
instruments be used only in conjunction with other measures which
examine the family environment, for example in an index of child-
rearing practices.
Key words: Parental attitudes, parenting practices, child-rearing, index,
maternal.

INTRODUCTION parent-child relationship (see Belsky, 1984). The


Parental Attitude Research Instrument (PARI;
Parents are often regarded as the main influence on Schaefer and Bell, 1958) was widely used in both
children’s behavioural, emotional and develop-
research and clinical practice in the 1960s. However,
mental outcomes. The determinants of parenting in
after an extensive review of the research literature
Belsky’s (1984) process model encompassed three
on the PARI, Becker and Krug (1%5) concluded that
domains: characteristics of the parents, charac- it would be more profitable to work toward new
teristics of the child and contextual sources of stress
approaches. Holden and Edwards (1989) did an
and support. In terms of stress on the parent-child extensive review of child-rearing attitude question-
relationship, parental characteristics are considered
naires and concluded that all of them are subject
to be more important than the other two domains.
to criticisms of their design, structure and validity;
Parental characteristics include personality and
for example, the relationship to parental behaviour.
psychological well-being (Belsky, 1984)and parental
Other scales of parental attitudes have been
attitude, which previous studies have shown to be
developed (Baumrind and Black, 1967; Delhees,
related to children’s developmental outcomes (Silva Cattell and Sweney, 1970), but the PARI has
and Fergusson, 1976). continued to be used and cited extensively in the
Parents’ attitudes toward child-rearing and family
literature. One of the aims of this ongoing research
life have long been of interest in terms of the
project was to examine parental characteristics and
-~ ~ children’s outcomes and as alternative scales had
*To whom correspondence should be addressed not been sufficiently evaluated at the time this

1057-3593192102012 1 -06$08 .OO Received 16 Iune 1991


0 1992 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Accepted 25 February 2992
122 Warren R. Stanton and Phil A . Silva

project began, we re-examined some of the PARI’s Measures


properties and relationships with other measures The following measures were used in Study 1:
of parental characteristics administered to two (i) the Parental Attitude Research Instrument;
Dunedin samples. Furthermore, as components of (ii) socio-economic level (Elley and Irving, 1972);
the PARI have been successfully applied in other (iii) Maternal General Mental Ability (Thurstone and
related areas such as the risks of problem parenting Thurstone, 1973); (iv) the Cornell Health Index
(Avison, Turner and Noh, 1986), the aims of this (Brodman et al., 1951); (v) maternal training in child
study were to use this instrument to examine: development (a five-point scale described by Silva,
(a) the association between parenting attitudes and 1976); (vi)the Comrey Personality Scales (Comrey,
parenting practice; (b) the association between 1970); and (vii)the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
parenting attitudes and measures of personality and (Terman and Merrill, 1960), administered to the
psychological well-being; and (c) an alternative use children.
for parental attitude questionnaires as part of an
index of child-rearing practices.
Results
Factor analysis (Frane and Hill, 1973) of the 23
subscales indicated a three-factor solution, these
STUDY 1 factors explaining 57%of the total variance. The first
factor, which was designated Authoritarian Control,
Method had factor loadings in excess of 0.6 on 12 of the 23
subtests; for example, Deification of Parents,
Sample Fostering of Dependency, and Breaking the Will.
The sample in Study 1 consisted of 215 mothers The second factor, designated Maternal Un-
of preschool children aged 4 years, studied as part happiness, had high loadings for the subtests of
of the Queen Mary Hospital Child Development Irritability (0.82), Rejection of the Home-making
Study (Silva, 1978). They were selected for a pilot Role (0.73) and Marital Conflict (0.48). Equali-
study of the effects of perinatal problems on tarianism was the name given to the third factor
children’s development prior to Study 2, described because of the high factor loadings of the subtests
below. Approximately half the sample children had Encouraging Verbalization (0.71), Equalitarianism
completely normal perinatal histories and the (0.64) and Comradeship and Sharing (0.54). With
remainder had experienced some kind of neonatal the exception of the correlation of 0.362 for
problem (Silva, 1978). Authoritarian Control and Maternal Unhappiness,

Table 1. Correlations* between four PARI factors and measures of parental characteristics and child intelligence
PARI
Parental Authoritarian PARI PARI
characteristics Control Unhappiness Equalitarianism
1. Socio-economic Level 0.316 0.150 -0.158
2. Mother’s general mental ability -0.419 -0.042 0.244
3. Mother’s physical health symptoms 0.136 0.267 0.039
4. Mother’s mental health symptoms 0.125 0.358 -0.021
5. Mother’s training in child development -0.315 -0.093 0.123
6. Mother’s personality
Trust -0.245 -0.261 0.159
Orderliness 0.221 -0.084 0.068
Conformity 0.349 -0.054 -0.153
Activity 0.104 -0.239 0.131
Stability -0.158 -0.437 0.090
Extraversion -0.129 -0.109 0.221
Masculinity -0.249 -0.131 0.083
Empathy 0.221 0.198 0.128
7. Child intellieence
” - 0.265 -0.086 0.155
*Correlations above 0.09 significant at p<O.Ol
Parental Attitude Research lnstrurnent 123
~

correlations between the factor scores were low. Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study
Correlations between factor scores and socio- (DMHDS). This sample is described in detail by
economic level, mother’s general mental ability, the Silva (1990).In summary, the sample members were
Cornell Health Index (physical and psychological part of a cohort born at Dunedin’s only obstetric
symptoms), maternal training in child development, hospital, Queen Mary, between 1 April 1972 and
and eight aspects of personality as measured by the 31 March 1973. Their perinatal histories were
Comrey Personality Scales are set out in Table 1. documented soon after birth, and they were first
followed up at age 3 years and again at age 5 years.
Discussion There were 1139 children eligible for inclusion in
the study (i.e. known to be still resident in the
The factors of the PARI derived from this study were province of Otago); 1037 were enrolled in the study
similar to those found by two other factor analytic and assessed at age 3 years and 991 were assessed
studies (Zuckerman et al., 1958; Schaefer, l%l). With at age 5 years. Most of the children were assessed
one exception, intercorrelations among the factor within 2 months of their birthdays.
scores were low, indicating little overlap between
them. Each factor was correlated with other maternal Measures
characteristics and child intelligence. An attitude of For Study 2 the following measures were used:
Unhappiness in relation to parenting was associated (i) a shortened version of the PARI; (ii) socio-
with psychological well-being and physical well- economic level (Elley and Irving, 1972);(iii) maternal
being. However, Authoritarian Control was clearly general mental ability (Thurstone and Thurstone,
of most interest as it correlated significantly with 1973); (iv) level of maternal education (five-point
socio-economic level, maternal general mental scale described by Silva, 1976); (v) maternal reading
ability, training in child development, certain age (Burt Word Reading Test; Vernon, 1967);
maternal personality factors (trust, orderliness, (vi) child language development (Reynell, 1969)
conformity, masculinity and empathy) and child administered to their children. Additional measures
intelligence, but not to psychological well-being. used in the study were: (vii) an index of family
The three subscales of the PARI that loaded adversity (Stanton, McGee and Silva, 1991); (viii)
highest on Authoritarian Control (Excluding Outside index of child-rearing practices (Stanton, McGee
Influences, Intrusiveness, and Acceleration of and Silva, 1991).The shortened version of the PAN
Development)were included in the shortened version was also administered during the age 5 assessment
of the PARI. It was decided to retain additional items of this ongoing study to provide an estimate of
in a shortened form of the PARI to avoid undue stability of parental attitude.
’response set’ (Becker and Krug, 1965). Of the
remaining two factors, Equalitarianism had relatively
more highly loaded subscales than Maternal Un- Results
happiness. Furthermore, the items in this factor The mean Authoritarian Control score for the
generally evoked agreement on the part of the res- mothers was 34.6, standard deviation 7.81. The
pondents, whereas the Authoritarian Control state- range was 15-60. The distribution of scores
ments tended to evoke disagreement. The three approached a normal form. The wide dispersion of
subscales that had loaded highest on Equalitarianism scores indicates that some mothers showed strong
and were used in the shortened form of the PARI agreement with the Authoritarian Control state-
were Encouraging Verbalization, Equalitarianism ments while others showed strong disagreement.
and Comradeship and Sharing. The shortened The correlation between the PARI Authoritarian
form of the PARI used in this study, together with Control scores obtained when the children were
scoring instructions, may be obtained from the ages 3 and 5 years was 0.68.
authors.
Maternal Attitudes and Maternal Characteristics
The correlations in Table 2 show that Authoritarian
STUDY 2 Control correlated substantially with all the
maternal variables but to a lesser extent with socio-
Method economic level.
Sample In order to examine the extent to which the
The Study 2 sample consisted of 1024 mothers of maternal characteristics were related to the variance
1037 3-year-olds enrolled in the Dunedin of the Authoritarian Control score, a stepwise
124 Warren R. Stanton and Phil A . Silva

Table 2. Correlations* among scores on Authoritarian Control and maternal general mental ability, maternal education,
maternal reading age, and socio-economic level (n=987)
Variable 1 2 3 4
1. Authoritarian Control - - -
2. Maternal general mental ability -0.480 - -
3. Maternal education -0.380 0.434 -
4. Maternal reading age -0.427 0.623 0.343
5. Socio-economic level 0.141 --0.209 --0.193
*All correlations significant at p < 0.01

Table 3. Summary of stepwise regression analysis on the PARI Authoritarian Control scale (n=987)
Step Variable Multiple regression Variance Explained
1. Maternal general mental ability 0.480 23.07 -
2. Maternal education level 0.517 26.88 3.61
3. Maternal reading age 0.536 28.75 2.07
4. Socio-economic level 0.536 28.75 0.00

multiple regression analysiswas carried out (Kerlinger In order to explore further the relationship
and Pedhuser, 1974) upon the total sample for whom between maternal authoritarian attitudes and child
all the information was available ( n= 987) with language development, the sample was divided into
Authoritarian Control as the dependent variable. two groups: (a) low or average Authoritarian
The results of these analyses, summarized in Table Control (i.e. all scores up to one standard deviation
3, show that maternal general mental ability, above the mean, that is 15-44 (n= 881), and (b) high
education level and reading age resulted in a Authoritarian Control (i.e. all scores one standard
multiple correlation of 0.536 with Authoritarian deviation above the mean or higher, that is 45-60
Control. Socio-economiclevel did not increase the (n = 143). Scores on the Reynell Developmental
multiple correlation. This analysis indicated that Language Scales indicated that the high Authori-
28.8%of the variance of Authoritarian Control could tarian Control group had a mean language score
be attributed to these maternal measures. about 3 months lower than the comparison group,
An index of family adversity used by Stanton, ( p < 0.001).
McGee and Silva (1991) consisted of the number of
risk factors present from the following list of family Maternal Attitude and Child-rearing Practices
background variables: (a) low socio-economicstatus; An index of adverse child-rearing practices which
(b) young mother (less than age 20 at birth of first was developed by Stanton, McGee and Silva (1991)
child); (c) single mother; (d) large family size (four included subscales from the PARI as well as the
or more children); (e) low maternal mental ability; presence or absence of the following conditions
(f) high maternal neuroticism score. A high number when the child was age 3 years: (a) rejection of child
of risk factors (three or more) was significantly (based on psychometrist’s observation of a range
associated with a high maternal authoritarian of maternal behaviours toward the child); (b)
attitude score (x2=54.07, p<O.OOl). Calculation of protectiveness of child (as for Part A); (c) number
the odds ratio (OR) indicated that mothers with a of experiences by child (e.g. rides on a bus, going
high number of adversities were six times more to a zoo, factory, sports event, watching television);
likely to have a high authoritarian attitude score (d)child did not attend pre-school; (e) parent had no
than those with no such adversities. training, information or experience of child-rearing;
(f) separations from child (more than one separation
Maternal Attitude and Early Child Development of more than a week on each occasion). A high
Correlationsbetween the measure of Authoritarian maternal authoritarian score was found to be s i g h -
Control and measures of early language development cantly associated with a high score for rejection of
computed for 1015 cases for whom the relevant infor- child (2=5.6; p=0.02; OR=2.87), a low number of
mation was available were: Verbal Comprehension, experiences (x2=4.66;p=0.03; OR=1.61) and no
- 0.188; Verbal Expression - 0.145. These correla- preschool attendance (x2=17.1, p<O.OOl, OR=
tions, while statistically significant, were small. 2.90), but not with the remainder of the measures.
Parental A t t i t u d e Reseurch Instrument 125
-

Discussion REFERENCES
Although the PARI was designed to measure a Avison, W. R., Turner, R. J . and Noh, S. (1986).Screening
variety of attitudes, the factor analysis in Study 1 for problem parenting: preliminary evidence on a
identified three factors. These factors were found promising instrument. Child Abuse and Neglect, 10,
157-170.
to correlate significantly with some maternal Baumrind, D. and Black, A. E. (1967). Socialization
characteristics a n d two were found to correlate with practices associated with dimensions of competence in
a measure of child intelligence (Table 1).Study 2 preschool boys and girls. Child Deuelopment, 38,291-327.
enabled a n examination of some of the properties Becker, W. C. and Krug, R. S. (1965). The Parent Attitude
of a shortened form of the PARI, which w a s a Research Instrument - a research review. Child
measure of Authoritarian Control. Moderately high Development, 36, 329-365.
correlations between this measure a n d maternal Belsky, J. (1984).The determinants of parenting: a process
model. Child Development, 55, 83-96.
general mental ability, education levels, a n d reading Brodman, K., Erdmann, A . J., Lorge, I. and Wolff, H. G.
age were obtained (Table 2) a n d these three (1951). The Cornell Medical Index-Health
maternal measures explained 28.8%of the variance Questionnaire 11. Journal of the American Medical
of the attitude measure. Further analysis showed Association, 145, 152-157.
that the mothers with higher verbal ability scores Comrey, A. L. (1970). Comrey Personality Scales. California:
a n d those who were better educated tended to be Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
Delhees, R. H., Cattell, R. 8. and Sweney, A. B. (1970).
less authoritarian in their expressed attitudes about The structure of parents' intrafamilial attitudes and
child-rearing a n d family life (Table 3). Furthermore, sentiments measured by objective tests and a vector
mothers who scored high o n the measure of model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 82, 231-252.
Authoritarian Control were much more likely Elley, W. B. and Irving, J. C. (1972). A socio-economic
than t h e remainder of the sample to have a index for New Zealand based on levels of education and
higher number of risk factors related to family income hom the 1966 Census. New Zealand Journal of
Educational Studies, 7, 153-167.
adversity. Frane, J. W. and Hill, M. A . (1973). Annotated Computer
A review of parental attitude questionnaires Output for Factors Analysis Using Professor Jaruick's
led Holden a n d Edwards (1989) to state that to Smoking Questionnaire, Health Science Computing
influence children the attitudes must be stable, Facility, Department of Biomathematics, University of
coherent a n d reflect behaviour. In this study, California, Los Angeles.
maternal authoritarian attitudes were highly cor- Holden, G. W. and Edwards, L. A. (1989). Parental
related (0.68) over a 2-year period. In terms of attitudes toward child rearing: instruments, issues and
implications. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 29-58.
validity, a high authoritarian score was associated Kerlinger, F. N. and Pedhezur, E. J . (1974). Multiple
with rejection of t h e child, relatively fewer stimu- Regression in Behavioral Research. New York: Holt,
lating experiences for the child, a n d the child not Rinehart and Winston.
attending preschool. McGee, R., Williams, S. M. and Silva, P. A. (1984).
According to Belsky (1984), parental charac- Background characteristics of aggressive, hyperactive,
teristics are the most important component of the and aggressive-hyperactiveboys. Journal of the American
Academy of Child Psychiatry, 23, 280-284.
parent-child relationship. However, reviews have Reynell, J. (1969). Reynell Deuelopmental Language Scales.
established that parental attitudes o n their o w n do London: National Foundation for Educational Research.
not provide an adequate description of the family Schaefer, E. S. (1961). Converging conceptual models for
environment (Holden a n d Edwards, 1989). The maternal behavior and for child behavior. In J. C.
results of the present studies confirmed that Glideswell (Ed.), Parental Attitudes and Child Behavior.
attitudes to parenting are associated with other Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Schaefer, R. S. and Bell, R. W. (1958). Development of
maternal characteristics. Therefore, the recom- a parental attitude research instrument. Child
mended approach for use of parental attitude Development, 29, 339-361.
questionnaires is to include measures of parental Silva, P. A. (1976).A Thousand Dunedin Three Year Olds.
attitude in a n index of adverse child-rearing A Multidisciplinary Study of Child Development:
practices. In this study, the PARI has provided a A Research Report Presented to the Medical Research
measure of maternal authoritarianism which, in Council of New Zealand.
Silva, P. A . (1978). Some biological and environmental
conjunction with other measures of maternal
factors relating to early child development. A brief
characteristics, has been found to be useful in other description of the Queen Mary Multidisciplinary Child
areas (McGee, Williams a n d Silva, 1984; Silva, Development Study. In O'Rourke, B. and Clough, J.
McGee, Thomas and Williams, 1982) of this ongoing (Eds), Early Childhood in New Zealand. Auckland:
study. Heinemann Educational Books.
126 Warren R. Stanton and Phil A . Silva

Silva, P. A. (1990). The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health Vernon, P. E. (1967). The Burt (Rearranged) Word Reading
and Development Study: a fifteen-year-long study. Test Standardisation. London: University of London
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 4, 76-107. Press.
Silva, P. A. and Fergusson, D. M. (1976). Socio-economic Zuckerman, M., Bibbac, B. B., Monashkin, I. and Norton,
status, maternal characteristics, child experience, and J. A. (1958).Normative data and factor analysis on the
intelligence in preschool children. New Zealand journal PARI. journal of Consulting Psychology, 22, 165-171.
of Educational Studies, 11, 180-188.
Silva, P. A., McGee, R. O., Thomas, J. and Williams,
S. M. (1982). A descriptive study of socio-economic
status and child development in Dunedin five-year-olds:
a report from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Child
Development Study. New Zealand Journal of Educational ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Studies, 17, 21-32.
Stanton, W.R., McGee, R. 0. and Silva, P. A. (1991). The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and
Indices of perinatal complications, family background, Development Study is supported by the Medical
child-rearing and health as predictors of early cognitive Research Council of New Zealand, and involves
and motor development. Pediatrics, 88, 954-959. several departments of the University of Otago.
Terman, L. M. and Merrill, M. R. (1960). The Stanford-
Binet Intelligence Scale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Much of the data has been gathered by volunteer
Thurstone, T. G. and Thurstone, L. L. (1973). The S R A workers from the Dunedin community. The authors
Verbal and Non-verbal Forms. Chicago: Science Research are indebted to the many people whose contribution
Associates. makes this ongoing study possible.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen