Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
LUCKY D. MANALO
Petitioner,
-vs-
PROVIDERS MULTI-PURPOSE
COOPERATIVE CASE No. ________
PETITION
With all due respect to the Honorable Court. Petitioner through the undersigned
counsel most respectfully state that:
9. That the last check released on August 24, 2017 was named to the
contractor, NORTHERNSKY BUILDERS owned by Mr. JOSHUA
BANIHIT;
10. That it was said that PROVIDERS will release after the trusses are done,
but after trusses were made , there was still no release made;
11. Petitioner again asked the respondent PROVIDERS for the remaining
loaned amount, however, they promised that they will release
remaining amount after roofing was made, there was still no release up
to present;
12. That after said released of the above mentioned amounts, PROVIDERS
Multi-Purpose Cooperative no longer released any of the remaining
amount of the loan for reasons that the house is not more than the
amount loaned;
Petition
Page 3 of 4
ﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫ∞ﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫﻫ
13. Due to this, petitioner was forced to complete the house from their own
fund to prevent the materials in stock from damaging and prevent from
rust;
14. Further, unreleased loans resulted to unpaid materials incurred to the
supplier of their materials, MR. ARDIANO A. OLAVIDEZ which
even resulted to herein complainant to be invited by the PNP-Isabela
PPO, Criminal investigation and Detection Group headed by ALAIN
JERICHO R. CUYOPAN, Police Chief Inspector which is hereto
attaches as Annex “D”;
15. That the invitation of herein petitioner caused her mental anxiety and
sleepless nights, that should the loan have been released on time as
agreed upon, said problem should not have occurred;
16. That to prevent another adversities, herein petitioner paid the
outstanding balance to the said hardware out from their own and not
from any amount released by the cooperative;
17. That as per agreement of herein petitioner borrower, she will not be
charged for any interest until the amount of loan is completely
released, however, such is not the case;
18. That sometime on July, PROVIDERS were insisting to decrease the loan
of TWO MILLION (Php 2,000,000.00) PESOS without the
consent of herein complainant, Principal Borrower;
19. That they even offered petitioner to loan their capital share in the
cooperative instead of releasing the remaining amount of their loan;
20. With this, they are pushing herein complaint to incur more loan;
21. That by reason of the actuations of the respondent, petitioner was
compelled to secure the services of counsel and initiate the present suit
and spend for this case in the amount of Php 50,000.00 PESOS.
PRAYER
Such other relief’s which may be just and equitable under the premises are
likewise prayed for.