Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

Compatibility Report for Ball charge design Mill 2.

xls

The following features in this workbook are not supported by earlier versions of
Excel. These features may be lost or degraded when you save this workbook in
an earlier file format.

Minor loss of fidelity

Some cells or styles in this workbook contain formatting that is not supported by
the selected file format. These formats will be converted to the closest format
available.
# of occurrences

20
BALL CHARGE DESIGN

Enter in cells shaded yellow Notes PLANT Nairobi


Results are in red MILL CM
DATE
Comments

Mill Speed 16.28 rpm 69.1% critical speed Installed Power 1800 kW

COMPARTMENT 1 Effective Length 3.43 m COMPARTIMENT 2 Effective Length 7.45 m


Effective diameter 3.22 m Effective diameter 3.22 m
Steel Density: 7.8 Steel Density: 7.8
Ball Charge Bulk Density: 4.5 t/m3 Ball Charge Bulk Density: 4.7 t/m3

(Density = Corundum :3,5 - Steel : 7,8)

CHARGE C1 Date
% Weight vs Diameter - C1
30.0%
Ø Balls TONNAGE % Weight Th. Slegten
90 mm 6.70 24.2% 20.0 % 25.0%
80 mm 6.00 21.7% 38.4 %
70 mm 5.10 18.4% 25.6 % 20.0%
60 mm 6.30 22.7% 16.0 %
50 mm 3.60 13.0% 15.0%

27.70 t 10.0%

Volume Loading: 22.1% 5.0%


Avg Ball Weight (kg/ball): 1.21 kg
22954 0.0%
Number of Balls
11.09 m2/t 90 mm 80 mm 70 mm 60 mm 50 mm
Avg Surf Area:

CHARGE C2 Date
% Weight vs Diameter - C2
Ø Balls TONNAGE % Weight 40.0%
50 mm 0.40 t 0.6% 35.0%
60 mm 6.00 t 8.4%
30.0%
30 mm 16.20 t 22.8%
25 mm 18.89 t 26.5% 25.0%
20 mm 27.00 t 37.9% 20.0%
17 mm 2.70 t 15.0%
10.0%
71.19 t 5.0%
0.0%
Volume Loading: 25.0%
50 60 30 25 20 17
Avg Ball Weight (kg/ball): 50 g mm mm mm mm mm mm
Number of Balls 1411460
Avg Surf Area: 29.75 m2/t
Avg Surf Area at end of charge: 35.85 m2/t
70 Charge distribution with perfect classification
60
50
Mill Power (SLEGTEN)
40
C1 333 kW 30
C2 819 kW
20
TOTAL 1151 kW at Mill Shaft
10
Efficiency 0.95 0
1212 kW at Mill Motor
3

10

11

Maille Slegten
Polysius

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen