Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
WRTG 2010
Ron Christiansen
Final Paper
A number of people fight to keep Performing Arts in the education system while others
fight to get rid of it. However, some people would like to fight for music, just not using the most
Starting in the early 1900s, this was the first that music was seen in four-year universities.
Then the National Association for Music Education, then known as the Music Supervisor’s
National Conference, held its first conference in Iowa in 1907 (Stanford). This conference had
104 attendees, comprised of six lessons within two days, and talked about Philip C. Hayden’s
Ear Training in Rhythm Forms. This annual conference is still going on to this day (Fehr).
Fast forward to 2001, according to the No Child Left Behind Act the arts become a “core
subject”, but not one that requires testing. This means that in high school, you are required to
fulfill an arts credit through music or art, but there is no standardized testing at the end of it. This
allows schools to take funding from the arts programs or cut them altogether when math and/or
English are struggling. On the other hand, NAFME argues that music education is beneficial for
biggest influence (“Why Music Education Actually Matters”). When you do look at the science,
it does make sense. With music, the brain uses the entire brain whereas other subjects use only
30%-50% of the brain. This figure on the previous page demonstrates only a portion of the brain
Everyone has heard of the famous composer Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, commonly
known as Mozart. Some say that if you listen to his music while studying, you will understand
and retain it better. It is also said this effect lasts for 10-15 minutes after the music stops.
According to J. S. Jenkins, after listening to Mozart, a person’s spatial IQ score can increase by a
mean of 8-9 points, but only for the 10-15 minutes afterwards. However, just because the effect
only lasts for 10-15 minutes after, this doesn’t mean the information taken won’t be retained
(Jenkins). This method can help students retain information easier if they have a hard time
Even though there is science to prove that with music, students can do better in school
many still do not believe music should become a core subject that is tested. First off, when you
look at Athletics versus Performing Arts, the Athletics department gets way more funding. In
New York City, there is $27 million to go around to all the public high school football teams
(Honan). Whereas in fiscal year 2016, the Arts in Education Program received $27 million for
the entire nation (“Federal Funding for Arts Education”). The budget of music in public schools
is often one of the most fought over debates. When supporting a music program, the school must
pay for instruments, playing space, various concerts, and even hire and pay new faculty to teach
(McDaniel). For example, a student tuba can cost as low as $10,000 and as high as $20,000.
Then paying to keep the school running at night to host a concert can be a heft expense when you
3 Hellige
talk about a sound system, air conditioning, high intensity lights, and paying the teacher(s)
overtime.
Next, we come to music detracting from other subjects in school. Those who argue
against music in school say that it takes too much time outside of school. The time for practice,
performances, or trips can be extensive (McDaniel). Yes, they are right in that reason. If you
were to ask any private teacher, they would say that they want their students to practice at least
one hour per day outside of normal school practice. Performances can do the same thing. What if
a student has a biology final but they can’t study the night before because they have a band
performance? Yes, there are some issues, however, they can be worked out.
Finally, we come down to one last point, which rejects the construction of the current
debate. Peter Greene suggests that instead of fighting that music helps raise students’ test scores,
why don’t we take a different approach for it? He admits that he has been in bands, pit
orchestras, and even conducted a few church choirs. However, when it comes to begging the
administrators in schools for more money, he says that we shouldn’t be playing to what they
want to hear. “Music programs are watching administrators race by, frantically chasing test
scores and ignoring music in schools. So it may seem like a natural step to go running after the
testing crowd hollering, ‘Hey, I can help with that, too,’” says Peter. By chasing the
administration saying that you can raise test scores, you make the future of testing dependent on
music, thus buying into testing (Greene). In some ways, he’s right. Music teachers have been
making this argument for over 20 years now and the situation has hardly improved, so why not
change tactics?
In my own opinion, music educators should continue to fight the same way, but provide
the facts that show music helps students increase test scores and well-being. I have to agree with
4 Hellige
Peter Greene that we keep fighting, but his idea to change the approach completely isn’t needed.
It is my belief that music educators are going to administration, telling them that music helps, but
not giving the administration the facts and science as to why it helps. These facts are what will
convince Congress and the Board of Education fully as to why music helps. I recently saw a post
on Facebook that complained about art being taken for granted. It proposed a challenge that I
think everyone should try. This challenge was, go thirty days without art: Music, paintings,
drawings, etc. At the end of the thirty days, see how you feel because humans thrive on art. It has
been there since the beginning of time with mindless banging on drums and cave drawings, to
Works Cited
www.theperformingartsalliance.org/issue/federal-funding-for-arts-education/.
Fehr, Roz. “NAfME's History, the Evolution of Music Education–and Taylor Swift!” NAfME,
evolution-of-music-education-and-taylor-swift/.
defending-music-education-_b_7564550.html.
Hellige, Shaun. “Senior Capstone Project.” Google Slides, Google, 19 May 2017,
docs.google.com/document/d/1ICmXU9F_D3kJdwkLqAZSR5uSEuyrjBnPyQGynlRR8z
s/edit.
Honan, Katie. “See How Much Your High School Spends on Boys' and Girls' Sports .” DNAinfo
york/20161017/elmhurst/psal-public-school-athletic-league-spending-sports-new-york-
city/.
Jenkins, J S. “The Mozart Effect.” Advances in Pediatrics., U.S. National Library of Medicine,
classroom.synonym.com/negatives-music-school-8136295.html.
6 Hellige
Stanford, Grace Ann. “History of Music Education in the United States.” EduNova, www.edu-
nova.com/history-of-music-education-in-the-us.html.
“Why Music Education Actually Matters.” NAfME, National Association for Music Education,
The biggest revision on this piece that I did was to my own opinion. In my earlier drafts, it
seemed to readers that I was portraying that I agreed completely with Peter Greene’s argument,
but in reality, I only agree to continuing to fight for music education. So I had to reword that to
say that I think we keep arguing the same way that we have been.