Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
To cite this article: Shantanu Dutta, Arup Kumar Biswas & Sukumar Pati (2018): Natural
convection heat transfer and entropy generation inside porous quadrantal enclosure with
nonisothermal heating at the bottom wall, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, DOI:
10.1080/10407782.2018.1423773
none defined
1. Introduction
The study of natural convection in an enclosure filled with porous medium has received considerable
attention from the research community in the last few decades owing to its manifold applications in
several engineering and environmental problems which include thermal insulation, electronic equip-
ment cooling, geothermal energy extraction, nuclear reactor system, solar heating, grain storage, food
processing, etc. A comprehensive documentation of these applications can be found in Nield and
Bejan [1], Bejan et al. [2], Ingham et al. [3], Pop and Ingham [4], Vafai [5], and Ingham and Pop [6].
Appreciating the importance of natural convection in an enclosure filled with porous medium, a
rich and variety of numerical and experimental investigations have been conducted by several
researchers to study the fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics. The geometry of enclosures
considered were square [7–18], rectangular [19–22], triangular [23–26], parallelogram [27–31],
trapezoidal [32–35], and rhombic [36–39]. Astanina et al. [15] in a recent work studied the transient
natural convection inside a square porous cavity with the consideration of temperature-dependent
viscosity. According to their findings, the convective flow and heat transfer become intensified with
an increase in the viscosity variation parameter for the porous media, while the effect is opposite in
the case of pure fluid. Chou et al. [16] analyzed the effects of temperature-dependent viscosity
on natural convection inside porous media between two concentric spheres. Pandit and
Chattopadhyay [22] used higher order compact scheme to investigate the transient natural convection
in a deep enclosure filled with porous medium. The works presented by researchers on different
geometries as mentioned mainly focused on the effects of different boundary conditions, aspect ratio
for rectangular enclosure, undulation on the wall, inclination angle for square and trapezoidal
enclosure, magnetic field, presence of heat sources, presence of block or geometrical obstruction, etc.
Nomenclature
cp specific heat of the fluid, J kg 1 K 1 U, V dimensionless x and y velocity components,
Da Darcy number respectively
g acceleration due to gravity, m s 2 u, v x and y velocity components,
h convective heat transfer respectively, m s 1
coefficient, W m 2 K 1 x, y axial and transverse coordinates, respect-
k thermal conductivity, W m 1 K 1 ively, m
K permeability, m2
L enclosure length, m Greek symbols
Nu local Nusselt number α thermal diffusivity
Nu average Nusselt number β coefficient of thermal expansion
p pressure, N m 2 θ dimensionless temperature
P nondimensional pressure µ dynamic viscosity
Pr Prandtl number υ kinematic viscosity
Re Reynolds number ρ density of fluid, kg m 3
S total dimensionless entropy Subscripts
Sθ dimensionless entropy generation due to avg average
heat transfer b bottom wall
Sψ dimensionless entropy generation due to c cold wall
fluid friction min minimum
T temperature, K max maximum
on the flow and heat transfer characteristics. Substantial advancements have also been reported in
modeling of porous media which include the effects of inertia, drag, acceleration, local thermal
nonequilibrium between fluid and solid matrices, temperature-dependent viscosity, etc.
It is also worth mentioning in this context that natural convection inside complex-shaped
enclosures has numerous applications including building systems with complex geometries, solar
collectors, lubrication systems, electric machinery, cooling system of microelectronic systems and
devices. Research investigations on the natural convection heat transfer inside complex-shaped
geometries, however, have been only a few in number [40–47]. Shiina et al. [40] experimentally
studied natural convection in a hemisphere heated from below and developed a correlation for aver-
age Nusselt number for a wide range of Rayleigh numbers and Prandtl numbers (106 � Ra � 1010 and
6 � Pr � 13,000). Chen and Cheng [41] performed a numerical and experimental investigation to
study the natural convection heat transfer in an inclined arc-shaped enclosure by varying Grashof
number (Gr) in the range 104 � Gr � 107 and the inclination angle (θ) in the range 0 � θ � π.
Kim et al. [42] analyzed natural convection heat transfer in a meniscus-shaped cavity for both
cylindrical and spherical geometries. Aydin and Yesiloz [43] performed an experimental and numeri-
cal investigation on natural convection heat transfer in a two-dimensional quadrantal enclosure
isothermally heated from the bottom and cooled from the vertical side for different values of Rayleigh
number, Ra in the range of 103–107. Yesiloz and Aydin [44] studied the buoyancy-induced flow and
heat transfer in an inclined quadrantal cavity both experimentally and numerically by varying the
inclination angle in the range of 0° � ϕ � 360° and the Rayleigh number in the range of 105–107.
Sen et al. [45, 46] performed the numerical investigation to analyze the natural convection heat
transfer in quadrantal cavity having hot bottom wall and cold curved wall and using heater on
adjacent walls for Rayleigh number in the range of 103 � Ra � 107 and found out that both flow
and temperature fields are affected by a changing Ra. They also found out that heat transfer increases
with an increase in Rayleigh number and the flow strength increases with an increase in the size of
heater on the vertical wall compared to the bottom wall and temperature fields are also affected. In
contrast, with an increase in size of heater on both sides of adjacent walls flow strength does not
change significantly. Bose et al. [47] performed numerical simulation to study the natural convection
heat transfer in quadrantal cavity having finned hot vertical wall and cold bottom wall for Rayleigh
number in the range of 104 � Ra � 106.
NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER, PART A 3
It is worth mentioning that the process of transfer of heat due to finite temperature difference is an
irreversible process causing the generation of entropy. To utilize the energy resources efficiently, the
entropy generation associated with transfer of heat during physical processes should be minimum. To
develop a thermodynamically efficient thermal system, Bejan [48] introduced the entropy generation
minimization based on second law of thermodynamics. Thus, proper attention should be made to
minimize the entropy generation while transferring heat during any physical process. The entropy
generation for natural convection in a porous enclosure of different geometries has been extensively
analyzed by several researchers [13, 14, 18, 23–24, 49–54]. The main focus of most of the works was to
identify the major sources of the entropy generation as well as the location of the local maxima of
entropy generation for different values of Rayleigh number and Darcy number.
It is important to mention in this context that buoyancy-driven flows in fluid-filled enclosures satu-
rated with porous medium and subjected to nonisothermal thermal boundary condition have a wide
variety of practical applications. Appreciating the usefulness of the thermal boundary conditions, a great
deal of research work has been reported in the literature [9–11, 18–20, 24, 25, 30, 34, 38–39, 49–53] on
natural convection heat transfer in a porous enclosure with nonuniform wall temperature.
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no work has been reported in the literature on natural
convection inside a quadrantal enclosure filled with porous media induced by nonuniform heating.
Accordingly, the aim of the current investigation is to analyze the natural convection heat transfer
and entropy generation characteristics inside a two-dimensional porous quadrantal enclosure. The
bottom wall of the enclosure is heated sinusoidally and the vertical wall is cooled by a constant
temperature bath, while the curved wall is kept adiabatic. The results are illustrated in the form of
streamlines, isotherms, local Nusselt number along the walls, average Nusselt number, entropy
generation due to heat transfer and fluid flow, and average Bejan number for a wide range of Rayleigh
numbers (103–106) and Darcy numbers (10 5 to 10 3).
2. Theoretical formulation
Consider a two-dimensional quadrantal enclosure saturated with porous media as shown in Figure 1.
The vertical wall is cooled at constant temperature, while the curved wall is thermally insulated. The
bottom wall is nonuniformly heated as given in the following [23]:
� � ��
Th Tc 2px
T ð x Þ ¼ Tc þ 1 cos ð1Þ
2 L
where Th is the maximum temperature of the heated wall, Tc is the temperature at the cold wall, and L
is the height of the enclosure.
The major assumptions made to analyze the present problem are as follows:
i. The fluid confined within porous bed is Newtonian and the flow is steady, laminar, and
incompressible.
ii. The effect of viscous dissipation is neglected.
iii. The physical properties except the density in the body force term are considered to be constant.
The variation of density in the body force term with temperature follows Boussinesq
approximation.
iv. The radiation heat transfer is neglected.
v. Darcy–Forchheimer model is used to simulate the momentum transfer in the porous medium.
vi. The temperature of the fluid phase is equal to the temperature of the solid phase everywhere and
local thermodynamic equilibrium is applicable.
Under these assumptions, the governing transport equations of mass, momentum, and energy con-
servation pertinent to the analysis of the physical problem described as above can be written in
dimensionless form as follows:
4 S. DUTTA ET AL.
Continuity equation:
qU qV
þ ¼0 ð2Þ
qX qY
x-Momentum equation:
� 2 �
qU qU qP q U q2 U U
U þV ¼ þ Pr þ Pr ð3Þ
qX qY qX qX 2 qY 2 Da
y-Momentum equation:
� 2 �
qV qV qP q V q2 V Pr
U þV ¼ þ Pr þ V þ RaPrh ð4Þ
qX qY qY qX 2 qY 2 Da
Energy equation:
qh qh q2 h q2 h
þV U ¼ 2þ 2 ð5Þ
qX qY qX qY
In the above equations, various dimensionless parameters are defined as X ¼ Lx, Y ¼ Ly , U ¼ uL
a,
2 3
T Tc pL gbðTh Tc ÞL Pr
V ¼ vL K
a , h ¼ Th Tc , P ¼ qa2 , Da ¼ L2 , Ra ¼ n2 , where L is the length of the enclosure, u
and v are the dimensional velocities in x and y directions, respectively, α is the thermal diffusivity,
p is the dimensional pressure, ρ is the density of fluid, g is gravitational acceleration, β is the volu-
metric thermal expansion coefficient, ν is the kinematic viscosity, K is the permeability of the porous
media, Pr is Prandtl number, Da is Darcy number, and Ra is Rayleigh number.
The following boundary conditions are used to solve Eqs. (2)–(5):
U ¼ V ¼ 0 and h ¼ 0 ðalong ACÞ ð6bÞ
1
U ¼ V ¼ 0 and h ¼ ð1 cosð2pxÞÞ ðalong ABÞ ð6bÞ
2
distribution of local entropy generation, one can estimate Bejan number as:
Sh
Be ¼ ð14Þ
Sh þ Sw
The relative global dominance of entropy generation due to heat transfer is quantified by the
average Bejan number (Beavg), which can be determined as follows:
Sh;total
Beavg ¼ ð15Þ
Sh;total þ Sw;total
The value of average Bejan number varies in the range 0 � Beavg � 1. The entropy generation due
to heat transfer dominates when Beavg ≫ 0.5, whereas the entropy generation due to fluid friction
becomes dominant when Beavg ≪ 0.5.
Table 1. Comparison of average Nusselt number on the bottom wall for different grid systems with Pr ¼ 0.71 and Da ¼ 10 3.
No. of elements
Ra 33,744 168,280 316,241 Relative error (%)
103 1.22 1.22 1.22 0
104 1.24 1.24 1.24 0
105 1.84 1.85 1.86 0.5
106 5.55 5.57 5.59 0.3
NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER, PART A 7
Figure 2. Streamline and isotherm contours for a quandrantal enclosure filled with a fluid (Pr ¼ 6.62) where bottom wall is heated
uniformly, vertical sidewall is cooled at constant temperature, while curved wall is adiabatic at Ra ¼ 1:7�105 .
Table 2. Comparison of average Nusselt number on the uniformly heated bottom wall from the present work with those reported
by Lauriat and Prasad [56].
Da Ra Present work Lauriat and Prasad [56] Difference (%)
2
10 103 1.00 1.02 1.9
104 1.62 1.70 4.7
105 4.10 4.26 3.7
4
10 105 1.03 1.06 2.8
5
Figure 3. Streamlines and isotherms for different Rayleigh numbers at Da ¼ 10 (a) Ra ¼ 103, (b) Ra ¼ 104, (c) Ra ¼ 105,
(d) Ra ¼ 106.
curved walls toward the edges of the bottom wall, thus forming two cells, left one rotating in antic-
lockwise direction and right one rotating in clockwise direction. For all cases, the strength as well as
the size of the left circulation cell is more as compared to that of the right cell. The reasons for such
NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER, PART A 9
4
Figure 4. Streamlines and isotherms for different Rayleigh numbers at Da ¼ 10 (a) Ra ¼ 103, (b) Ra ¼ 104, (c) Ra ¼ 105,
(d) Ra ¼ 106.
observation are the imposed boundary conditions and the profile of the walls adjacent to the bottom
one (vertical and curved). For Da ¼ 10 5, the strength of the vortex is negligibly small when Ra ¼ 103
because of combined confluence of high resistance to flow and low buoyancy force. With an increase
10 S. DUTTA ET AL.
3
Figure 5. Streamlines and isotherms for different Rayleigh numbers at Da ¼ 10 (a) Ra ¼ 103, (b) Ra ¼ 104, (c) Ra ¼ 105,
(d) Ra ¼ 106.
in Rayleigh number, the buoyancy force increases as a result of which the strength of the vortices
rotating in both anticlockwise and clockwise directions is enhanced. For example, the maximum
strength of vortex at Ra ¼ 103 is 0.001, while for Ra ¼ 106, it is 1.1. For Da ¼ 10 5, the isotherms
NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER, PART A 11
as displayed in the right panel of Figure 3, are distributed smoothly throughout the enclosure with
densely packed in a region close to middle of the heated bottom wall (0.25 � X ≤ 0.75) and the influ-
ence of Rayleigh number on the distribution of isotherms is not significant. This indicates that heat is
transferred mainly due to conduction because of the fact that resistance force due to fluid friction
dominates over the buoyancy force. Moreover, the temperature gradient on the bottom wall is
maximum at the middle for all values of Rayleigh number because of the fact that the temperature
on the bottom wall is maximum at the middle.
For Da ¼ 10 4, the distribution of streamlines and isotherms as shown in Figure 4 is qualitatively
similar to that for Da ¼ 10 5 up to Ra ¼ 105 except the fact of enhancement in the strength of the
vortices. Under these situations, the force due to fluid friction being dominant opposes buoyancy
force to establish any fluid motion in the enclosure and hence the mode of heat transfer is conduction.
However, when Rayleigh number is increased to 106, because of strengthening the buoyancy force, the
viscous resistance is overcome and the fluid motion is established. This is aptly reflected through the
enhanced strength in the vortices (maximum 14.5) (see Figure 4d). The corresponding isotherms
become distorted because of increased strength of convection and the principal mode of transport
of thermal energy within the enclosure is changed from conduction to convection.
It can be observed from the distribution of streamlines and isotherms as displayed in Figures 5a
and 5b that for Da ¼ 10 3, the buoyancy force is unable to overcome the viscous force for Rayleigh
number up to 104 and accordingly the dominant mode of thermal energy transport is diffusion of
heat. However, for higher values of Rayleigh number (105 and 106), the strength of the vortices is
increased to a great extent. The size of right circulation cell decreases, while that of left cell is
increased significantly with an increase in Rayleigh number. In contrast to the smoothly distributed
isotherms for lower values of Rayleigh number, isotherms are distorted at higher Rayleigh number
and moreover the thickness of the thermal boundary layer decreases resulting in steep temperature
gradient at the heated wall. Such observation can be elucidated from the fact that the permeability
of the medium being more at higher values of Darcy number, fluid can easily flow through the pores
and enhanced strength of buoyancy force over viscous force at higher Rayleigh number.
The combined effect of these two results in enhancement in the intensity of flow.
Figure 6. Variation of local Nusselt number on heated bottom wall for different values of Rayleigh number (a) Da ¼ 10 5,
(b) Da ¼ 10 4, (c) Da ¼ 10 3.
bottom wall being heated maximum rises upward and then moves toward the edges of the bottom
wall thus forming two rotating cells.
It can be noticed from Figure 6b that for Da ¼ 10 4 the trend in the variation of local Nusselt
number at the bottom wall is same for Rayleigh number up to 105 and moreover the change in its
value with Rayleigh number at any position on the wall is negligibly small. This indicates that the
resistance to flow of fluid through the pores of the medium is still high because of low permeability
and accordingly the mechanism of transport of thermal energy is diffusion. However, when Rayleigh
number is increased to 106, there is an alteration in the variation of the local Nusselt number both in
its pattern and numerical value as noticed from the distribution of streamlines and isotherms. The
location of the maximum local Nusselt number has shifted from the middle of the bottom wall toward
the curved wall. Such observation can be explained as follows. The strength of the buoyancy force gets
enhanced and becomes dominant over viscous force in this situation and as a result the dominant
mode of heat transfer becomes convection. The temperature gradient at the heated wall becomes
steep at higher values of Rayleigh number because of thin thermal boundary layer thickness and this
augments the rate of heat transfer substantially.
As can be seen from Figure 6c that for Da ¼ 10 3 the variation of local Nusselt number at the
bottom wall with Rayleigh number is invariant both qualitatively and quantitatively for Rayleigh
NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER, PART A 13
number up to 104 owing to the fact that buoyancy force dominates over viscous force although
permeability of the medium is relatively high and accordingly the heat transfer is mainly dominated
by conduction. For Rayleigh number beyond 104, the local Nusselt number is strongly influenced by
Rayleigh number and the enhancement in the Nusselt number is significant for Ra ¼ 106. This can be
explained from the fact that the strength of the buoyancy force increases with an increase in Rayleigh
number and the same becomes dominant over viscous force once Rayleigh number is increased
beyond 104. As a result, the dominant mechanism of heat transfer is changed from conduction to
convection and the heat transfer increases with an increase in Rayleigh number and becomes
maximum when Rayleigh number is increased to 106.
The variation of local Nusselt number along the vertical cooled wall for different values of Rayleigh
number and Darcy number is plotted in Figures 7a–7c. One can see that local Nusselt number is
negative throughout indicating that the heat transfer is from the fluid to the wall. It can be seen from
Figure 7a that for Da ¼ 10 5, the change in Nusselt number with Rayleigh number is negligibly small
similar to bottom wall for the reasons already mentioned. It is further seen that the local Nusselt num-
ber increases initially, reaches its maximum value and thereafter decreases. This is owing to the fact
that heat transfer is mainly due to conduction and temperature gradient at the vertical wall initially
increases and thereafter decreases as can be seen from the isotherm contour (Figure 3). The similar
Figure 7. Variation of local Nusselt number on cooled vertical wall for different values of Rayleigh number (a) Da ¼ 10 5,
(b) Da ¼ 10 4, (c) Da ¼ 10 3.
14 S. DUTTA ET AL.
trend in the variation of Nusselt number is observed for Rayleigh number up to 105 when Da ¼ 10 4
and for Rayleigh number up to 104 when Da ¼ 10 3 for the reasons already enlightened. However,
the local Nusselt number increases monotonically with distance when Da ¼ 10 4 and Ra ¼ 106, which
is in stark contrast as compared to other values of Rayleigh number. Similarly, when Da ¼ 10 3, the
local Nusselt number increases monotonically for Ra ¼ 105 and 106. Such contrasting features can be
elucidated from the isotherm contour as can be seen from Figures 4d and 5c and 5d.
Table 3. Average Nusselt number on the bottom and vertical walls for different values of Rayleigh number and Darcy number.
Average Nusselt number on bottom wall Average Nusselt number on vertical wall
5 4 3 5 4 3
Ra Da ¼ 10 Da ¼ 10 Da ¼ 10 Da ¼ 10 Da ¼ 10 Da ¼ 10
3
10 0.774 0.776 0.778 0.775 0.778 0.778
104 0.775 0.797 0.799 0.776 0.796 0.798
105 0.776 0.816 1.18 0.779 0.82 1.18
106 0.798 1.319 3.55 0.80 1.33 3.57
NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER, PART A 15
5
Figure 8. Local entropy generation due to heat transfer (Sθ) and fluid friction (Sψ) for Da ¼ 10 (a) Ra ¼ 105 and (b) Ra ¼ 106.
4
Figure 9. Local entropy generation due to heat transfer (Sθ) and fluid friction (Sψ) for Da ¼ 10 (a) Ra ¼ 105 and (b) Ra ¼ 106.
16 S. DUTTA ET AL.
3
Figure 10. Local entropy generation due to heat transfer (Sθ) and fluid friction (Sψ) for Da ¼ 10 (a) Ra ¼ 105 and (b) Ra ¼ 106.
Table 4. Total entropy generation rate and average Bejan number for different Darcy numbers.
Ra Da Sθ,max Sψ,max ST Beavg
104 10 5
13.781 0.00008 13.78108 0.999
4
10 13.471 0.0011 13.4721 0.999
3
10 13.374 0.099 13.473 0.992
106 10 5
13.830 0.0837 13.9137 0.993
4
10 30.202 15.00 45.202 0.668
3
10 133.65 1041.00 1174.65 0.113
To identify the dominant source of irreversibility globally, average Bejan number is calculated for
different values of Rayleigh number and Darcy number and is presented in Table 4. It can be seen from
Table 4 that for Ra ¼ 104, average Bejan number is close to unity for all the values of Darcy number.
This indicates that for lower values of Rayleigh number, the irreversibility caused by fluid friction is
negligibly small in the enclosure and the entropy generation is mainly because of heat transfer due
to conduction. It can be further observed from Table 4 that the major contributor of irreversibility
is strongly dependent on Darcy number for Ra ¼ 106. The irreversibility due to fluid flow is negligibly
small for lower values of Darcy number (Da ¼ 10 5) because of low permeability of the medium. The
contribution of global fluid friction irreversibility increases with an increase in Darcy number and it
becomes the significant contributor for larger values of Darcy number (Da ¼ 10 3).
4. Conclusion
In the present work, we execute numerical experiments to study the natural convection heat transfer
and entropy generation characteristics inside a two-dimensional quadrantal enclosure filled with a
NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER, PART A 17
saturated porous medium. The enclosure is heated nonuniformly from bottom wall, while the vertical
wall is cooled to a constant temperature and the curved wall is kept adiabatic. The important findings
from the current investigation are summarized as follows:
For lower values of Darcy number (10 5), the heat transfer in the enclosure is mainly due to
conduction and it is not influenced by Rayleigh number. For higher values of Darcy number, the
dominant mode of heat transfer is dependent on Rayleigh number. The heat transfer is dominated
by conduction for lower values of Rayleigh number, whereas for higher values of Rayleigh number
heat transfer is mainly due to convection and the critical value of Rayleigh number for such transition
depends on Darcy number. Furthermore, the heat transfer is significantly altered at higher values of
Rayleigh number and Darcy number.
The entropy generation rate is almost invariant with Darcy number for lower values of Rayleigh
number (103, 104), whereas the rate of entropy generation varies significantly with the Darcy number
for higher values of Rayleigh number.
For all values of Rayleigh number, entropy generation due to heat transfer is the significant
contributor of irreversibility at low values of Darcy number, while for larger values of Darcy number
and Rayleigh number entropy generation due to fluid friction becomes dominant over that due to
heat transfer.
References
[1] D. A. Nield and A. Bejan, Convection in Porous Media, 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 2006.
[2] A. Bejan, I. Dincer, S. Lorente, A. F. Miguel, and A. H. Reis, Porous and Complex Flow Structures in Modern Tech-
nologies. New York: Springer, 2004.
[3] D. B. Ingham, A. Bejan, E. Mamut, and I. Pop (Eds.), Emerging Technologies and Techniques in Porous Media.
Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004.
[4] I. Pop and D. B. Ingham, Convective Heat Transfer: Mathematical and Computational Modelling of Viscous Fluids
and Porous Media. Oxford: Pergamon, 2001.
[5] K. Vafai, Handbook of Porous Media. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2000.
[6] D. B. Ingham and I. Pop, Transport Phenomena in Porous Media. Oxford: Pergamon, 1998.
[7] N. H. Saeid and I. Pop, “Transient free convection in a square cavity filled with a porous medium,” Int. J. Heat
Mass Transfer, vol. 47, pp. 1917–1924, 2004. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.10.014.
[8] N. H. Saeid and I. Pop, “Non-darcy natural convection in a square cavity filled with a porous medium,” Fluid Dyn.
Res., vol. 36, pp. 35–43, 2005. DOI:10.1016/j.fluiddyn.2004.10.004.
[9] N. H. Saeid, “Natural convection in porous cavity with sinusoidal bottom wall temperature variation,” Int.
Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 32, pp. 454–463, 2005. DOI:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2004.02.018.
[10] T. Basak, S. Roy, T. Paul, and I. Pop, “Natural convection in a square cavity filled with a porous medium: effects of
various thermal boundary conditions,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 49, pp. 1430–1441, 2006. DOI:10.1016/j.
ijheatmasstransfer.2005.09.018.
[11] M. Sathiyamoorthy, T. Basak, S. Roy, and I. Pop, “Steady natural convection flow in a square cavity filled with a
porous medium for linearly heated side wall(s),” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 50, pp. 1892–1901, 2007.
DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.10.010.
[12] S. A. Khashan, A. M. Al-Amiri, and I. Pop, “Numerical simulation of natural convection heat transfer in a porous
cavity heated from below using a non-Darcian and thermal non-equilibrium model,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer,
vol. 49, pp. 1039–1049, 2006. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.09.011.
[13] P. Datta, P. S. Mahapatra, K. Ghosh, N. K. Manna, and S. Sen, “Heat transfer and entropy generation in a porous
square enclosure in presence of an adiabatic block,” Trans. Porous Med., vol. 111, pp. 305–329, 2016. DOI:10.1007/
s11242-015-0595-5.
[14] P. A. K. Lam and K. A. Prakash, “A numerical study on natural convection and entropy generation in a porous
enclosure with heat sources,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 69, pp. 390–407, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.
ijheatmasstransfer.2013.10.009.
[15] M. S. Astanina, M. A. Sheremet, and J. C. Umavathi, “Unsteady natural convection with temperature-dependent
viscosity in a square cavity filled with a porous medium,” Trans. Porous Med., vol. 110, pp. 113–126, 2015.
DOI:10.1007/s11242-015-0558-x.
[16] H. Chou, H. Wu, I. Lin, W. Yang, and M. Cheng, “Effects of temperature-dependent viscosity on natural convec-
tion in porous media,” Numer. Heat Transfer A, vol. 68, pp. 1331–1350, 2015. DOI:10.1080/10407782.2015.
1012864.
18 S. DUTTA ET AL.
[17] L. Tian, C. Ye, S. Xue, and G. Wang, “Numerical investigation of unsteady natural convection in an inclined
square enclosure with heat-generating porous medium,” Heat Transfer Eng., vol. 35, pp. 620–629, 2014.
DOI:10.1080/01457632.2013.837676.
[18] P. Meshram, S. Bhardwaj, A. Dalal, and S. Pati, “Effects of the inclination angle on natural convection heat transfer
and entropy generation in a square porous enclosure,” Numer. Heat Transfer A, vol. 70, pp. 1271–1396, 2016.
DOI:10.1080/10407782.2016.1230433.
[19] Y. Varol, H. F. Oztop, and I. Pop, “Numerical analysis of natural convection for a porous rectangular enclosure
with sinusoidally varying temperature profile on the bottom wall,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 35,
pp. 56–64, 2007. DOI:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2007.05.015.
[20] H. F. Oztop, “Natural convection in partially cooled and inclined porous rectangular enclosures,” Int. J. Thermal
Sci., vol. 46, pp. 149–156, 2007. DOI:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.04.009.
[21] S. Sivasankaran, Y. Do, and M. Sankar, “Effect of discrete heating on natural convection in a rectangular porous
enclosure,” Trans. Porous Med., vol. 86, pp. 261–281, 2011. DOI:10.1007/s11242-010-9620-x.
[22] S. K. Pandit and A. Chattopadhyay, “Higher order compact computations of transient natural convection in a
deep cavity with porous medium,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 75, pp. 624–636, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.
ijheatmasstransfer.2014.03.079.
[23] S. Bhardwaj and A. Dalal, “Effect of undulations on the natural convection heat transfer and entropy generation
inside a porous right-angled triangular enclosure,” Numer. Heat Transfer A, vol. 67, pp. 972–991, 2015.
DOI:10.1080/10407782.2014.949152.
[24] S. Bhardwaj, A. Dalal and S. Pati, Influence of wavy wall and non-uniform heating on natural convection heat
transfer and entropy generation inside porous complex enclosure,” Energy, vol.79, pp. 467–481, 2014.
DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.036.
[25] Y. Varol, H. Oztop, M. Mobedi, and I. Pop, “Visualization of natural convection heat transport using
heatline method in porous non-isothermally heated triangular cavity,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 51,
pp. 5040–5051, 2008. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.04.023.
[26] M. Zeng, P. Yu, F. Xu, and Q. W. Wang, “Natural convection in triangular attics filled with porous medium
heated from below,” Numer. Heat Transfer A, vol. 63, pp. 735–754, 2013. DOI:10.1080/10407782.2013.756702.
[27] A. C. Baytas and I. Pop, “Free convection in oblique enclosures filled with a porous medium,” Int. J. Heat Mass
Transfer, vol. 42, pp. 1047–1057, 1999. DOI:10.1016/s0017-9310(98)00208-7.
[28] E. Baez and A. Nicolas, “2D natural convection flows in tilted cavities: Porous media and homogeneous fluids,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 49, pp. 4773–4785, 2006.
[29] Q. W. Wang, M. Zeng, Z. P. Huang, G. Wang, and H. Ozoe, “Numerical investigation of natural convection in
an inclined enclosure filled with porous medium under magnetic field,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 50,
pp. 3684–3689, 2007. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.01.045.
[30] G. Wang, Q. Wang, M. Zeng, and H. Ozoe, “Numerical study of natural convection heat transfer in an inclined
porous cavity with time periodic boundary conditions,” Trans. Porous Med., vol. 74, pp. 293–309, 2008.
[31] S. E. Ahmed, H. F. Oztop, and K. Al-Salem, “Natural convection coupled with radiation heat transfer in an
inclined porous cavity with corner heater,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 102, pp. 74–84, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.
compfluid.2014.06.024.
[32] A. C. Baytas and I. Pop, “Natural convection in a trapezoidal enclosure filled with a porous medium,” Int. J. Eng.
Sci. vol. 39, pp. 125–134, 2001.
[33] T. Basak, S. Roy, A. Singh, and A. R. Balakrishnan, “Natural convection flows in porous trapezoidal enclosures
with various inclination angles,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 52, pp. 4612–4623, 2009. DOI:10.1016/j.
ijheatmasstransfer.2009.01.050.
[34] E. Natarajan, T. Basak, and S. Roy, “Natural convection flow in a trapezoidal enclosure with uniform and
non-uniform heating of bottom wall,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 51, pp. 747–756, 2008. DOI:10.1016/j.
ijheatmasstransfer.2007.04.027.
[35] H. Saleh, R. Roslan, and I. Hashim, “Natural convection in a porous trapezoidal enclosure with an inclined
magnetic field,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 47, pp. 155–164, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.03.002.
[36] F. Moukalled and M. Darwish, “Natural convection heat transfer in a porous rhombic annulus,” Numer. Heat
Transfer A, vol. 58, pp. 101–124, 2010. DOI:10.1080/10407782.2010.497322.
[37] R. Anandalakshmi and T. Basak, “Heatline based thermal management for natural convection in porous rhombic
enclosures with isothermal hot side or bottom wall,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 67, pp. 287–296, 2013.
DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2012.11.022.
[38] R. Anandalakshmi and T. Basak, “Heatline analysis for natural convection within porous rhombic cavities with
isothermal/nonisothermal hot bottom wall,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 51, pp. 2113–2132, 2012. DOI:10.1021/
ie2007856.
[39] R. Anandalakshmi and T. Basak, “Heat flow visualization for natural convection in rhombic enclosures due to
isothermal and non-isothermal heating at the bottom wall,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 31, pp. 1325–1342,
2012. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.09.006.
NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER, PART A 19
[40] Y. Shiina, K. Fujimura, T. Kunugi, and N. Akino, “Natural convection in a hemispherical enclosure heated from
below,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 37, pp. 1605–1617, 1994. DOI:10.1016/0017-9310(94)90176-7.
[41] C. L. Chen and C. H. Cheng, “Buoyancy-induced flow and convective heat transfer in an inclined arc-shaped
enclosure,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 23, pp. 823–830, 2002. DOI:10.1016/s0142-727x(02)00189-3.
[42] C. J. Kim, and S. T. Ro, “Heat transfer correlation for natural convection in a meniscus-shaped cavity and its
application to contact melting process,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 39, pp. 2267–2270, 1996. DOI:10.1016/
0017-9310(95)00285-5.
[43] O. Aydin, and G. Yesiloz, “Natural convection in a quadrantal cavity heated and cooled on adjacent walls,” J. Heat
Transfer, vol. 133, pp. 052501–052507, 2011. DOI:10.1115/1.4003044.
[44] G. Yesiloz and O. Aydin, “Natural convection in an inclined quadrantal cavity heated and cooled on adjacent
walls,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., vol. 35, pp. 1169–1176, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2011.04.002.
[45] D. Sen, P. K. Bose, R. Panua, and A. Das, “Numerical analysis of laminar natural convection in a quadrantal cavity
with a hot bottom and cold curved walls,” Heat Transfer Res., vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 631–641, 2015. DOI:10.1615/
heattransres.2015004629.
[46] D. Sen, P. K. Bose, R. Panua, A. K. Das, and P. Sen, “Laminar natural convection study in a quadrantal cavity using
heater on adjacent walls,” Front. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013. DOI:10.5098/hmt.v4.1.3005.
[47] P. K. Bose, D. Sen, R. Panua, and A. K. Das, “Numerical analysis of laminar natural convection in a quadrantal
cavity with a solid adiabatic fin attached to the hot vertical wall,” J. Appl. Fluid Mech., vol. 6, pp. 501–510, 2013.
[48] A. Bejan, Entropy Generation Minimization. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1996.
[49] I. Zahmatkesh, “On the importance of thermal boundary conditions in heat transfer and entropy generation for
natural convection inside a porous enclosure,” Int. J. Thermal Sci., vol. 47, pp. 339–346, 2008. DOI:10.1016/j.
ijthermalsci.2007.02.008.
[50] T. Basak, R. S. Kaluri, and A. R. Balakrishnan, “Entropy generation during natural convection in a porous cavity:
Effect of thermal boundary conditions,” Numer. Heat Transfer A, vol. 62, pp. 336–364, 2012. DOI:10.1080/
10407782.2012.691059.
[51] G. G. Ilis, M. Mobedi, and B. Sunden, “Effect of aspect ratio on entropy generation in a rectangular cavity with
differentially heated vertical walls,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 35, pp. 696–703, 2008. DOI:10.1016/j.
icheatmasstransfer.2008.02.002.
[52] T. Basak, P. Gunda, and R. Anandalakshmi, “Analysis of entropy generation during natural convection in porous
right-angled triangular cavities with various thermal boundary conditions,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 55,
pp. 4521–4535, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.03.061.
[53] Y. Varol, H. F. Oztop, and I. Pop, “Entropy generation due to natural convection in non-uniformly heated porous
isosceles triangular enclosures at different positions,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 52, pp. 1193–1205, 2009.
DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.08.026.
[54] V. M. Rathnam, P. Biswal, and T. Basak, “Analysis of entropy generation during natural convection within
entrapped porous triangular cavities during hot or cold fluid disposal,” Numer. Heat Transfer A, vol. 69,
pp. 931–956, 2016. DOI:10.1080/10407782.2015.1109362.
[55] O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, The Finite Element Method, 4th ed. London: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
[56] G. Lauriat and V. Prasad, “Non-darcian effects on natural convection in a vertical porous enclosure,” Int. J. Heat
Mass Transfer, vol. 32, pp. 2135–2148, 1989. DOI:10.1016/0017-9310(89)90120-8.