Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Country Spain
Name Jonathon Edward Flynn
CiSELT unit and title Teaching Integrated Skills
Brief description of context, location and The British council ,Bilbao teaching centre
time (size of classroom, facilities/resources
available, time of day, lesson length, etc) – The Classroom is large and spacious with plenty of natural light.It
50 words maximum is equipped with 14 tables and chairs a whiteboard,IWB and PC
The Lesson takes place on Friday at 18.00 and lasts for 2.5 hours
with a 10 min break
Brief description of learners (how many, The class consists of 15 students between the ages of 13 and 14
age, level, special needs/behavioural
issues, etc) – The class is junior 4.
50 words maximum
There are no real behavioral issues.
Brief description of the new idea and why My new idea is a task based class with a small project based
chosen – 50 words maximum around an integrated skills lesson. The project involves producing
a film/audio of their own film review. To reach this objective they
will practice speaking, reading, writing and listening.
Lesson plan cover page
How does the lesson fit with The lesson fits perfectly with the syllabus because the integrated
syllabus/timetable? skills involved can be adapted to focus on what is being covered
(30 words maximum) with the syllabus.
Anticipated problems – 50 words maximum The main anticipated problems for this new idea are:
Proposed solutions – 50 words maximum Initially for the film review presentation I want them to consult only
notes on the subject of their favorite film. They will make notes
about the film they want to present as a review but will not be
allowed to reference them in the review.
Lesson procedure
Time Teacher activity Student activity Interaction Stage aim
18.00 Explain to the students that by the end of Listening T-S Communicate lesson aim.
today’s lesson they are going to produce a
film review. They will do this through first
studying vocab and grammar needed
followed by content and presentation.
18.05 Give each student a copy of the film Get them to ask and answer in S-S Speaking and note taking.
questionnaire pairs. This is a speaking activity,
but I would like them to make
notes on their partner’s answers.
S
Focus on a film review style.
18.15 Ask students to read the review and ask if Reading
they think it’s a good review for someone
who wants to see the film for the first time. Students should read the text and
notice that the review tells us who
lives and who dies. This is called
a spoiler as it spoils the film for
the viewer and is something that S-T
should be avoided in a good To help students comprehend
review. what is a film review, content
and length.
IWB: What kind of film is the review
about?
18.25 Answer IWB question.
Elicit that it’s a love story, a romance, and a
disaster film. Explain spoiler. Students then Vocabulary S
solve the anagrams in part 3 of the different Allow students to recognize
film genres. film vocabulary they can
recycle in their own
presentation.
IWB: Underline all film vocabulary.
18.30 (nouns, verbs)
18.35 IWB: Find 3 adjectives in the text that Finding vocabulary and
mean very good? answering.
S
Learning adjective partners.
18.40
Bring students attention to the adjective Grammar
matching exercise.
18.45 Ask students to reach under their desks. S-S
They will find a post it with either an
adjective or extreme adjective. They should
then walk around the class trying to find
their adjective/ext adjective partner. Once Speaking Introduce new vocabulary
they have found them, they should make a they can use with theor film
note of the partner word and return to their review.
seats.
BREAK
Hand out chart. They watch again and put
19.25 a tick ( ) in the B column if the things in the S
A column are mentioned. They don’t have
to write anything – only put a tick.
Listening comprehension
Listening comprehension
20.15
Speaking
Communication of ideas.
Reflection
What went well? Why? My only observation here is that the film review of Titanic could have been
the springboard for a short speaking activity - not just as a source of film-
(refer to the learners, learning outcomes related vocab. That said, where I thought the class was really successful
and stage aims, lesson procedures, tasks / was in the way you gave new language a communicative context. For
example, the activity where students had to match a base adjective with
activities and materials)
an extreme one could have easily been done simply as a mechanical
activity but I think the time you spent here was well worth it; how you took
the new vocab and formed mini-conversations around it e.g. getting the
students to think about 'gripping' films they'd recently seen. In conclusion;
The presentation activity was motivating for the students as they were
talking about a subject they are keen on (films) and also wanted to
present well in front of their peers and being provided with the vocabulary
they needed to do this activity well they felt comfortable with talking
without notes.
What didn’t go well? Why? I was a bit concerned at one point that the boys in the class were getting
too much air time although you did rectify this later on. Recommend for
whole-class speaking activities that you make sure they can all make eye-
(refer to the learners, learning outcomes
contact with each other - just a case of getting a few of them to push their
and stage aims, lesson procedures, tasks / chairs back. Jokin - the only slightly disruptive student in the group - had
activities and materials) managed to find the seat in the classroom which has its back to you more
than any other. When using an island-seating arrangement, make sure the
disruptive kids (as well as the quiet ones) have seats facing you.
What changes will I make next time? Why? The lesson plan was very comprehensive. However, one concern I had
prior to the lesson was that there was too much weighting on lexis: there
were on reflection before the lesson two lexical aims and no skills aims. In
reality, there was a lot of speaking about film as well as some listening and
reading. The speaking in this case certainly deserves to be one of the
main aims. I imagine that one of the themes of the integrated skills
component of CiSELT is getting a balance between skills work and
language-systems work - by language systems I mean vocab, grammar
and pronunciation. In short, this lesson turned out fine but at the lesson
planning stage I should have been alert to making sure that this balance
was there.
Result
Moderator: