Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
t
pp. 11~18 L StructuralEngineering ]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o.
Abstract
-12 K S C E J o u r n a l of Civil E n g i n e e r i n g
Determination of dynamic young's modulus of concrete at early ages by impact resonance test
m i n e d from t h e r e s o n a n t f r e q u e n c y os
Supp?a (Acccler~v:ter)
--
Fr=m=
Transducer
t h e specimen in t h e first mode. Fig. 1
(b) shows a typical f r e q u e n c y - d o m a i n
r e c o r d for t h e u n c o n s t r a i n e d compres-
la~tror~en~
Hammer
sion wave (Kim et al. 1997). T h e
u n c o n s t r a i n e d compression wave veloci-
ty, ~o, of the s p e c i m e n is calculated
from:
v c = f~. ~ (1)
w h e r e fl is t h e first mode r e s o n a n c e
f r e q u e n c y and A is t h e wave l e n g t h of
DyrJamirAnilyzer
Signal
first mode (2 x s p e c i m e n length). Once
t h e u n c o n s t r a i n e d wave velocity is
(a) Schematic diagram of impact resonance test d e t e r m i n e d , the Young's m o d u l u s is
given by
0.04 -
E= p , 2 (2)
c
0.03 -- f l : 8.32 KHz
w h e r e r is the bulk d e n s i t y of t h e
0.02
E specimen.
0.01 It is i m p o r t a n t to n o t e t h a t one
a t t e m p t s to m e a s u r e the u n c o n s t r a i n e d
O.CO
I I I ' I compression velocity (,~) in the IR t e s t
5000 1C(~0 15000 200~
Frequency (Hz) while in the pulse velocity m e a s u r e -
m e n t one m e a s u r e s t h e c o n s t r a i n e d
(b) Typical frequency domain result compression wave velocity (,p), which
is controlled by the c o n s t r a i n e d mo-
dulus, M. The r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n M
Fig. 1. Dynamic Young's Modulus Test Setup a n d E is d e t e r m i n e d as follows, once
t h e Poisson's ratio, u, is obtained:
in t h e specimen. Piezoelectric accet-
e r o m e t e r s (PCB Model 303A12) which 1- u (3)
M = (1+ u) (1-2 u)
can o p e r a t e reliably over wide ampli-
tude a n d f r e q u e n c y ranges, a r e used to 3. Experimental Work
m o n i t o r the response of t h e specimen.
T h e o u t p u t signals from t h e accelerom- E x p e r i m e n t a l work was focused on
eters and i n s t r u m e n t e d h a m m e r are t h e e v a l u a t i o n of t h e d y n a m i c Y o u n ~ s
conditioned and t h e n recorded w i t h a m o d u l u s of concrete at early age using
waveform analyze,'. T h e w a v e f o r m an- t h e i m p a c t r e s o n a n c e method. In this
alyzer has t h e capacity to p e r f o r m d a t a w o r k t h r e e m a i n p a r a m e t e r s were
acquisition a n d signal processing. T h e selected, namely: (1) concrete type -
schematic d i a g r a m of IR s e t u p is shown t h r e e different compressive s t r e n g t h s ,
in Fig. 1. (2) c u r i n g condition w e t a n d air
The Young's modulus, E, is deter- curing, and (3) c u r i n g age - 6 h o u r s to
surface w a s s m o o t h e r t h a n t h a t of p r e s s i v e s t r e n g t h at 7 d a y s w a s a b o u t
c r u s h e d rocks, r e s u l t i n g in w e a k e r 80% o f t h e 2 8 - d a y s t r e n g t h , w h i c h is
aggregate-paste bond strength. The corn- typical for s i l i c a - f u m e concrete.
'7. : , |; T
o
i t! rg
11
r 1
/1/ = t ~J
iJ F -,t r
\/ "
!
c~
IL
2. K; ''I
e~
,
o
V
c=
cl
j
\
t
o
o 20.00
0.00 10.00 10.00
Frlq~g~Cy IIkH2) Frequency (kl-lz)
Fig. 2, Typical Frequency Domain Results Obtained from Specimens Cured in Wet Condition
' ! illi
t iiiiii i~III......iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii(
~0 ..... J....... ..... !......i~
iiii(iiill
ttl
g r = ! oc:
I,-
r162 40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ~ . . . . . . . .
IIJ
>
r, gl
gl
IAI
I I II O
~ 1D 84 O
~ ! i l!ll o
....... i ...... i ............. ~ j J ~ r
i
3200 36o0 4ooo
o i ,~ r
44O0
VELOCITY (m/s)
TIME (hr)
(a) V e l o c i t y vs. C o m p r e s s i v e s t r e n g t h
(a) A i r C u r i n g 80 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N
~ 40
lqllPfi
#
~ !Jil f.L 20 . . . . 9 . . . . : . . . . . ..~; ,.~.;...: . , . .:
o 11i!!i
IQ
0
24
r
DYNAMIC
28
~
YOUNG'S
i
~.
" j
~(&
MODULUS
t I
40
(GPa)
I
44
18- K S C E J o u r n a l of Civil E n g i n e e r i n g