Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

CHAPTER I • Once a (PUJ) stops, it is in effect making a continuing offer to

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS riders ––– it is then the duty of drivers to stop their conveyances
for a reasonable length of time in order to afford passengers
Contract of Transportation an opportunity to board and enter and are liable for injuries
• When a person obligates himself to transport persons or suffered by boarding passengers resulting from sudden starting
property from one place to another for a consideration up of the carrier
• May be carriage of passengers or carriage of goods
• The person who obligates himself to transport ay be a Trains
common carrier or a private carrier • One who want to board must purchase a ticket and must
present himself at the proper place and in a proper manner
CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS for transportation; must as well have a bona fide intention to
Parties: (1) common carrier and (2) passengers use the facilities of the carrier, and possess sufficient fare
• One who travels in a public conveyance by virtue of contract, COMMON CARRIER
express or implied with the carrier subject to payment of fare ARTICLE 1732. Common carriers are persons,
or an equivalent thereof corporations, firms or associations engaged in the business of
• One still considered passenger even if he is being carried carrying or transporting passengers or goods or both, by land,
gratuitously or under a reduced fare water, or air, for compensation, offering their services to the
CARRIAGE OF GOODS • One that holds itself out as ready to engage in the
Parties: (1) shipper and (2) carrier transportation of goods for hire as a public employment
Consignee and not as a casual operation
• To whom the goods are delivered
• May be the shipper himself; however, a consignee may be a Tests:
third party to the contract –– bound by terms and 1. Must be engaged in the business of carrying goods for
conditions of the bill of lading where it was established that others as a public employment and must hold himself
he accepted the same and trying to enforce the out as ready to engage in the transportation of goods
agreement for persons generally as business and not as a casual
TYPES OF CONTRACTS OF CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS 2. Must undertake to carry goods of the kind to which his
1. Contract to Carry –– agreement to carry the passenger at business is confined
some future date; this is consensual and is therefore 3. Must undertake to carry by the method by which his
perfected by mere consent business is conducted and over his established roads
2. Contract of carriage or common carriage –– a real 4. Must be for hire
contract for not until the facilities of the carrier are Accordingly, 2nd and 3rd elements must not be part;
actually used can be said to have already assumed the one is accordingly a common carrier provided has space for all
obligation of the carrier who opt to avail themselves of its transportation for a fee.
The true test for a common carrier is not the quantity or
CONTRACTS OF CARRIAGE OF GOODS extent of business actually transacted, the the number and
1. Contract to Carry –– whereby the carrier agrees to accept character of conveyances used in the activity but whether the
and transport goods at some future date undertaking is a part of activity engaged in by the carrier that
2. Contract of carriage –– when goods are unconditionally he has held out to the general public as his business or
placed in the possession and control of the carrier and occupation.
upon their receipt by the carrier for transportation that
this contract is perfected Characteristics:
1. Art 1732 makes no distinction between one whose principal
Note: business activity is the carrying of persons or goods or
• The test as to whether the relation of shipper and carrier had both, and one who does such carrying only as an
been established is, had the control and possession of goods ancillary activity or sideline
have been completely surrendered by the shipper, then it can 2. Art 1732 also carefully avoids making any distinction
be said with certainty that the relation of the shipper and the between a person or enterprise offering transportation
carrier has been established. service on a regular basis and one offering on an
• The liability of the carrier as common carrier begins with the occasional , unscheduled basis
actual delivery of goods for transportation and not merely with 3. Art 1732 does not distinguish between a carrier offering its
the formal execution of a receipt or bill of lading; the issuance services to the general public or solicits business only
of a bill of lading is not necessary to complete delivery and form a narrow segment of general public
acceptance 4. One is a common carrier and has the obligations of the
• The presence of a ticket or a bill of lading or any written common carrier under the CC even if he did not secure
contract is not necessary for the perfection of a contract of a CPC
carriage 5. The CC makes no distinction as to the means of transporting
as long as it is by land, water or air
Aircraft 6. CC does not provide that transportation should be a motor
1. Contract to Carry –– perfected even when no tickets have vehicle
been issued to said passengers so long as there was 7. One may be a common carrier even if he has no fixed and
already a meeting of the minds with respect to the publicly known route, maintains no terminals and issues
subject matter and the consideration no tickets
2. Contract of carriage –– perfected if it can be established 8. One need not to be engaged in the business of public
that the passenger had checked in at the departure transportation for the provisions o CC on common
area, passed thru customs, boarded shuttle bus, carriers to apply to them
proceeded to the ramp, etc. 9. The carrier can also be a common carrier even if the
operator does not own the vehicle or vessel that he
Buses, jeepneys and street cars operates
Not Common Carrier by Law –– Under Sec 7 of RA 10668, foreign Registered Owner Rule
vessels engaging in carriage conducted in accordance with the • Person who is the registered owner of a vehicle is liable for any
said law shall not be considered common carriers under the CC; damage caused by the negligent operation of the vehicle
does not offering public service therefore not falling under RA although the same was already sold or conveyed to another
9295 person at the time of the accident.
• Liable to the injured party subject to his right of recourse
CHARTER PARTY –– contract by which an entire ship or some part against the transferee or the buyer.
thereof is let by the owner to an other person for a specified time
or use Rationale: Identify the owner so that responsibility therefore can
1. Bareboat or demise charter –– where the charterer mans be fixed on a definite individual.
the vessel with his own people and in effect, the owner • Registered owner not liable if the vehicle was taken
of the voyage or service stipulated; transform common from his garage without his knowledge and consent
carrier into a private one. • Rule applies even if the registered owner leased the
2. Contract of affreightment –– like a voyage charter (single vehicle to another who is the actual operator.
voyage) or time charter (fixed period), does not Registered owner is directly liable; to be free from
transform into a private carrier; use of shipping space on liability, lessor-owner must register the lease contract
vessels leased by the owner as part or whole with the LTO to bind 3rd parties.
NB: However that even if whole part of vessel is chartered, if
those who man it are the owner’s crew, still remains to be a Right of Recourse: passenger > registered owner > transferee
common carrier. (Element of control)
Kabit System
Common Carrier Private Carrier • Arrangement whereby a person who has been granted a
(a) undertaking is part of a general (a) undertaking is a single certificate of public convenience allows other persons to
business or occupation transaction even if for a fee operate their motor vehicles under his license for a fee or
(b) must observe extraordinary (b) must observe ordinary percentage; not penalized by law but is contrary to public
diligence diligence only –– diligence of a policy
(c) presumption of negligence is good father of a family • Prohibition of kabit system applies also to aircrafts and vessel.
presumed (c) negligence not presumed
(d) cannot stipulate that it is (d) may validly enter into such Pari Delicto Rule –– parties to the kabit system cannot invoke the
exempt from liability stipulation same as against each other either to enforce their illegal
agreement or to invoke the same to escape liability. No action
Towage Arrastre Stevedoring Travel Agency arises from an illegal contract and neither parties can seek relief
from the courts
one vessel is hauling of handling of contract of
hired to bring cargo, the cargo in service;
Boundary System –– carrier cannot escape liability by claiming
another vessel handling of the holds of service of
that the driver is a lessee; cannot exempt himself on the ground
to another cargo on the the vessel or arranging and
that he is a lessor.
place. service wharf or between the facilitating the
rendered to a between the ships’ tackle booking,
vessel by establishment and the holds ticketing and
towing for the of the of the vessel. accommodati
mre purpose consignee or provides labor on in a
Obligations of the Carrier:
of expediting shipper and in loading and package tour;
1. Accept passengers and goods without discrimination
her voyage the ship’s stowing of not a contract
2. Seasonably deliver the goods and bring passengers to their
without tackle. cargoes for its of carriage;
reference to responsibility clients; ordinary
3. Deliver the passengers or goods to the destination
any lasts until the ordinary diligence
4. Deliver the goods to the proper person
circumstances delivery of the diligence.
5. Exercise extraordinary diligence in the performance of its
of danger; cargo to the
ordinary consignee;
diligence has nothing to
Duty to accept passengers and goods without discrimination
do with trade
• According to the rulings of the SC, present laws disallow
discrimination, forbid failures or refusals to receive persons or
property for carriage which have the effect of giving an
services not
unreasonable or unnecessary preference or advantage to
maritime; but
any person
diligence is
Valid Grounds for Non-acceptance:
A. Goods sought to be transported are dangerous objects or
substances including dynamites and other explosives
• There are instances where the carrier may be
Types of Cargo Operation specially designed to carry dangerous chemicals
Line Service Tramp Service that are necessary for certain manufacturing
common carrier publicly offers no regular or fixed routes and businesses and may secure appropriate
services without discrimination to schedules, hired on contractual authorization for such.
any user, has regular ports, fixed basis, chartered by any one or few B. Unfit for transportation (Art. 356-357)
sailing schedules, and published shippers under mutually agreed • These goods may be by nature be unfit for
freight rates and attendant terms, matter of special transportation or are unfit because of improper
charges; common carrier arrangement between shipowner packaging or defect in containers
and shipper; common carrier C. Would result in overloading
depending on circumstances D. Considered contrabands or illegal goods
E. Injurious to health lawfully authorized by him to receive the goods for his account.
F. Goods will be exposed to untoward danger like flood,
capture by enemies, etc Delay to Transport Passengers
G. Goods like livestock will be exposed to diseases • The carrier must commence its trip within a reasonable time –
H. Strike – duty bound to transport passengers with reasonable
I. Failure to tender goods on time dispatch
• Also liable for any loss or damage, including any pecuniary loss
Duty to Make Timely Delivery or loss of profit which the passenger may have suffered by
reason of delay
Agreement as to Time
Goods must be delivered within the stipulated time; Duty to Exercise Extraordinary Diligence
when expressed in a contract, one is bound and held liable for Compliance must be with the element of integrity that
any delay, no matter what cause it may have arisen from the goods should be delivered in the same condition that they
What time must be followed? were received and to transport passengers without
1. What was stipulated encountering any harm or loss –– failure to exercise such will
2. If there is no fixed period: in the first shipment of the result in the breach of obligation of the carrier thru negligence.
same or similar goods which he may make to This high standard of care is imperatively demanded by
the point of delivery (Art 358, Code of the preciousness of human life and by the consideration that
Commerce) every person must in every way be safeguarded against all
Reasonable Time
When a common carrier undertakes to convey goods, Meaning of Extraordinary Diligence
the law implies a contract that they shall be delivered at • A man must use common sense, and exercise due reflection
destination within a reasonable time, in the absence of any in all his acts; it is his duty to be cautious, careful and prudent,
agreement as to the time of delivery if not from instinct, then through fear of recurring punishment.
1. Expected date of arrival reflected in the bill of lading may He is responsible for such results as anyone might foresee and
be considered for acts which no one would have performed except through
2. May also depend upon nature of goods culpable abandon. Otherwise, his own person, rights and
property, and those of his fellow beings, would ever be
Consequences of Delay exposed to all manner of danger and injury.
Excusable delay do not generally terminate the • It requires common carriers to render service with the greatest
contract of carriage and when it is removed, the master must skill and foresight and to use all the reasonable means to
proceed with the voyage. During the detention delay, the vessel ascertain the nature and characteristics of goods tendered for
continues to be liable as a common carrier and remains duty shipment, and to exercise due care in the handling and
bound to exercise extraordinary diligence. If delay is legally stowage including such methods as their nature requires,
inexcusable, the ff consequences results:
A. Carrier is still liable even if natural disaster caused the Non-Delegable Duty
damage The duty of seaworthiness, the duty of care of the
B. The stipulation limiting the liability of the carrier is inoperative cargo is non-delegable, and the carrier is accordingly
C. Carrier is liable for the damages caused by the delay responsible for the acts of the master, the crew, the stevedore,
D. Consignee may exercise his right to abandon under Art 371 and his other agents. It has also been held that it is ordinarily the
of the Code of Commerce duty of the master of a vessel to unload the cargo and place it
in readiness for delivery to the consignee, and there is an implied
Right to Abandon obligation that this shall be accomplished with sound machinery,
The consignee may leave the goods transported in the competent hands, and in such manner that no unnecessary
hands of the carrier informing him in writing before the arrival of injury shall be done thereto. And the fact that a consignee is
the same at the point of destination. The carrier shall then be required to furnish persons to assist in unloading a shipment may
liable for the total amount of goods. not relieve the carrier of its duty as to such unloading.
The foregoing provision confers upon the consignee an
exceptional but limited right to abandon the goods transported Presumption of Negligence
during the period intervening between the moment when the In case of injuries or damages, common carrier is
fault of the carrier produces a delay which is the generative presumed to be at fault or have acted negligently unless he
cause of action until the moment just before the arrival of the observed extraordinary diligence in the vigilance thereof. The
goods at the place of the delivery by communicating such court need not make an express findig of the fault of the carrier,
abandonment to the carrier in writing and when these as long as it is shown that: (1) there exist a contract between the
conditions do not concur, the refusal to accept cannot be passenger or shipper and common carrier, (2) that the loss,
effective. deterioration, injury or death took place during the existence of
NB: It will be remembered that in overland transportation, an the contract. The presumption is operative even if both parties
unreasonable delay in the delivery of goods is sufficient ground cannot establish the cause of damage or injury
for the abandonment of goods. By analogy, this can also apply
to maritime transportation. When goods are deemed delivered
The goods are deemed delivered to the carrier when
Place of Delivery the goods are ready for and have been placed in the exclusive
Delivered to the consignee in the place agreed upon possession, custody and control of the carrier for the purpose of
by the parties. If the place or warehouse is designated in the bill their immediate transportation and the carrier has accepted
of lading, the goods must be delivered in such place even if it is them. When the carrier has thus accepted such delivery, the
not the usual place of delivery in the place of destination. liability of then carrier commences eo instanti.

To whom delivered Duty to Third Persons

To the consignee or any other person to whom the bill Extraordinary diligence is primarily owed to passengers
of lading was validly transferred or negotiated; delivery must and the goods being transported however it was ruled that the
generally be made to the owner or consignee or someone duty even extends to the members of the crew or complement
operating it. TICKET, NO BOARDING” policy.

Effect of Stipulation on: i. Unreasonable delay (a period of time that lapsed without just
Goods Passengers cause and is solely attributable to the carrier which has
Parties cannot stipulate that the prejudiced the transportation of
There can be no stipulation lessening
carrier will not exercise ANY utmost diligence passengers and/or cargoes (DEPARTURE/ARRIVAL) – ticket
diligence in the custody of goods, refundable
neither can it be stipulated that ii. A passenger who no longer wants to use the carrier or has
the goods are at the shipper’s risk. actually failed to board the vessel can refund or revalidate the
HOWEVER, the law allows a ticket subject to assessment of surcharges.
stipulation whereby the carrier will
exercise a degree of diligence Revalidation –– accreditation of the ticket that is not used and
that is less than extraordinary with intended to be used for another voyage.
respect to goods
(b) Carrier’s Lien – failure of consigner/consignee to pay the
Passenger’s Baggage consideration grants the carrier the right to use the goods to
answer for the cost of transportation and other fees. The right
Passenger –– include whatever articles a passenger usually takes
with him for his own personal use, comfort, and convenience may only be exercised within 30 days. Thereafter carrier shall
according to the habits or wants of the particular class to which have no action than that corresponding to him as an ordinary
he belongs either with reference to his immediate necessities or creditor.
for the purpose of his journey.
4. Timely Loading and Unloading
CHAPTER III The shipper must make sure that the goods are delivered on the
DATE, TIME, and PLACE agreed upon.
Consignee must likewise timely obtain delivery from carrier.
In a contract of Carriage, both the carrier and the
passenger or shipper, as the case may be, has prestations to A. Carrier must give notice of arrival
perform. B. Consignee must present BoL to the captain
Note: failure to do so, consignee is held responsible for
1. Duty to Exercise Due Diligence warehousing and other expenses.
A. The shipper is bound to pay the consideration in the
form of freight or fare. Demurrage – claim for damages for failure to accept delivery.
Every improper detention of a vessel may be considered a
B. The shipper and passenger are also bound to exercise demurrage. Notice of arrival is often condition precedent to the
due diligence in avoiding damage or injury. right to collect demurrage charges.
Lay days – period within which to load and unload the cargoes
Negligence of Shipper or Passenger as agreed by the parties.
The shipper is obliged to exercise due diligence in
avoiding damage to the goods that are being shipped or injury 5. Permits
to his person. Clearance from government agency for the carriage
However the carrier cannot impute the negligence of its own of certain cargoes (ex. Animals, vehicles, hazardous substances,
employee to the person or entity that hired the carrier provided etc.)
the passenger exercises no other control over the conduct of the
driver. (Sps. Fabre v. CA) 6. Shipper’s Load and Count
A shipper under this arrangement is not inspected or
2. Duty to Disclose inventoried by the carrier whose duty is only to transport and
A common carrier is entitled to fair representation of deliver the containers in the same condition as when the carrier
the nature and value of the goods to be carried, with the received and accepted the containers for transport.
concomitant right to rely thereon, and a carrier has no
obligation to inquire into the correctness or sufficiency of such 7. Duties of Passenger
information. The passenger must pay the proper fare for the transportation.
1. The passenger must present himself on the proper place.
Damage caused by Cargoes 2. Must present himself at the proper time.
The shipper may be held liable for any damage that 3. Passenger is obligated not to bring such luggage that is in
may have been caused solely by the dangerous nature of the excess of the weight and size prescribed by regulations
cargoes or the defect of the packaging of the cargoes. or contract.
4. Passenger is also prohibited from transporting prohibited
3. Payment of Freight materials or goods, including animals.
Common carriers are subject to heavy regulation with
respect to rates that they are charging to the public. Travel Documents
When private property is used for a public purpose and is Passenger must secure appropriate travel documents.
affected with public interest, it ceases to be juris private only and A. Negligence if the passenger did not even check the date
becomes subject to regulation. of departure.
The fixing of just and reasonable rates involves a balancing of B. Airline may be held liable if the loss of documents was to the
the investor and the consumer interests. negligence of its employee. (PAL vs. CA)
Time to Pay the Freight
Air Transportation of Passengers
In the absence of any agreement, the consignee who
Civil Aviation Regulations provide for the following
is supposed to pay must do so within 24 hours from the time of
delivery (Article 374) unacceptable conducts:
1. No person on board may interfere with a crew member in
the performance of his or her duties.
(a) By Sea – the tickets are purchased in advance from ticket
outlets or booking offices. The carrier is bound to observe “NO 2. Each passenger shall fasten his or her seat belt and keep it
fastened while the seat belt sign is lighted. Thus, if carrier accepted goods knowing of improper packing or
3. No person on board an aircraft shall recklessly or negligently even if carrier does not know but the defect was nonetheless
act or omit to act in such a manner as to endanger the apparent upon ordinary observation NOT relieved from liability.
aircraft or persons and property therein.
Acts or Omission of Shipper
4. No person may secrete himself or herself nor secret a cargo
1. Failure to disclose nature of goods
on board an aircraft
2. Improper marking or direction as to destination
5. No person may smoke while the non-smoking sigh is lighted. 3. Improper loading when he assumes such responsibility
6. No person may tamper with, disable or destroy any smoke  When merely contributory, partial defense
detector installed in any airplane lavatory.
Order of Public Authority –– If thru order of public authority goods
DEFENSES OF COMMON CARRIERS were seized/destroyed, carrier not responsible PROVIDED said
1. Flood, storm, earthquake, lightning or other natural public authority had power to issue order
disaster or calamity NB: Mayor not considered public authority with power to issue
2. Act of the public enemy in war, whether international or such order
3. Acts or omission of the shipper or owner of the goods DEFENSES IN CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS
4. The character of goods or defects in the packing or in the  Primary defense: exercise of ED (even in FE, must be proven)
containers  Re: Employees
5. Order or act of competent public authority  Carrier liable for acts of employees: can’t claim
6. Exercise of extraordinary diligence exercise of due diligence in supervision and selection
(unlike in quasi-delicts)
Fortuitous event –– must be proximate and only cause to be valid  Re: Other passengers and third persons
defense; must still exercise due diligence to minimize damage or  With respect to acts of strangers and other passengers
loss to be exonerated from liability for the same resulting in injury to a passenger: also subject to such
Requisites: defense to prevent or stop act or omission
¶a) Must be impossible to foresee the event or if foreseen,  Negligence of carrier need not be the sole cause of
must be impossible to avoid injury or damage to passenger or goods: still liable
¶b) The cause must be independent of human will even if contractual breach concurs with negligent act
¶c) The occurrence must be such as to render it impossible for of another person
the debtor to fulfill his obligation in a normal manner  Relate to cases of: Maranan and de Gillaco
¶d) The obligor must be free from any participation or
aggravation of the injury resulting to the creditor PASSENGER’S BAGGAGES
 Inquiry may be made as to the nature of passenger’s
 Fire not a natural calamity but yes, if caused by lightning baggage but beyond this, constitutional boundaries
 Hijacking does not fall under categories of the exempting are already in danger of being transgressed
causes; carrier presumed to be at fault unless there is proof  General Rule: Carrier may only inquire on nature of
of extraordinary diligence baggage but not search or inspect its contents
 Mechanical defects ≠ fortuitous event  Exception: Airline companies are required to inspect
 Tire blowouts ≠ fortuitous event every cargo
 Hijacking cannot exculpate the carrier from liability if it is Kinds of Baggage:
shown that employees were not overwhelmed and that 1. Checked-in –– delivered to carrier; “goods”; 1733, 1734
there is no showing of irresistible force. HOWEVER, can be and 1736; ED
considered beyond control if for example hijacking was 2. Hand-carried –– in custody of passenger; “deposit”;
made by 3 armed men = unforeseeable. 1998, 2000-2003; Ordinary Diligence

Public Enemy –– presupposes state of war and refers to

government of a foreign nation at war with country to which the EXTRAORDINARY DILIGENCE
carrier belongs though not necessarily with that to which the Rationale:
owner of goods owes allegiance  A common carrier is bound to carry passengers safely as
 Thieves, rioters and insurrectionists not included; merely far as human care and foresight can provide, using
private depredators utmost diligence of very cautious persons with due regard
 Rebels in insurrection are generally not embraced in the for all circumstances
definition of public enemy. HOWEVER, if the rebels hold a  Calculated to protect passengers from the tragic mishaps
portion of territory, have declared independence, cast off that frequently occur in connection with rapid modern
allegiance and has organized armed hostility against transportation
government and authority of latter is overthrown = may
take on dignity of a civil war and so matured and A. EXTRAORDINARY DILIGENCE IN CARRIAGE BY SEA
magnified, parties are belligerents; entitled to belligerent Seaworthiness –– ED requires that ship is seaworthy; such is
rights impliedly warranted;
 PIRATES (enemies of civilized nations) = excuses carrier Must have degree of fitness which an owner exercising ED would
require his vessel to have at the commencement of voyage.
Improper Packing Includes:
Carriage of goods by Sea Act provides that carrier shall not be (a) Fitness to withstand rigors of voyage
liable for: (b) Fitness to store the cargoes and accommodate
1. Wastage in bulk or weight or any damages arising from passengers to be transported
the inherent defect, quality or vice of goods (c) Adequately equipped and properly manned
2. Insufficiency of packing  Carrier carries burden of proving seaworthiness: certificates
3. Insufficiency or inadequacy of marks ≠ sufficient to overcome presumption of negligence
4. Latent defects no discoverable by due diligence  General Test: WON ship and its appurtenances are
NB: Note, Article 1742. reasonably fit to perform service undertaken (e.g. dry-
docked and inspected by PCG)
 Carrier shall be bound before and at the beginning of
voyage to exercise due diligence to:
a) Make ship sea worthy
b) Properly man, equip and supply ship
c) Make all parts of the ship in which goods are
carried, fit and safe for their reception, carriage
and preservation
 Ship must be cargo-worthy –– efficiently strong and
equipped to carry the particular kind of cargo and safe to
proceed voyage

Overloading –– includes duty to take cargo and passengers

within carrying capacity of the vessel
Proper Storage –– ship may itself be suitable for cargo but it is not
enough because cargo must also be properly stored
NB: Must generally not placed on deck = raises presumption of
unseaworthiness unless proved that can’t interfere with proper

Negligence of Captain and Crew

Failure on part of carrier to provide competent captain
and crew must be distinguished from negligence of said persons,
because latter is covered by LIMITED LIABILITY RULE –– if can be
traced that they are really incompetent, LLR cannot be applied:
ship owner deemed negligent.

Deviation –– if there is agreement as to the road to be made,

carrier may not change route unless there be force majeure. Or
else, liable for all losses. On account of FM: reimbursed upon
formal proof –– increase in transportation charges
Transshipment –– act of taking cargo out of one ship to another;
if without legal excuse = violation of contract therefore subject
to liability


 Required to make sure that vehicles are in good
 Duty bound to make sure that parts purchased are
not defective
 Failure to comply with basic traffic rules ≠ extraordinary
 NCC provides for presumption of negligence in case
accident occurs while operator is violating traffic rules
 No unbending duty to inspect each and every baggage
only on certain circumstances (Relate to case of Nocum)
Airworthiness –– components and accessories ae of proper
design and construction and are safe for navigation purposes;
such design and construction being consistent with accepted
engineering practice
 Flight cancelled due to FE ≠ duty ended –– still obligated to
look after the convenience and comfort of passenger
 Has duty to make inquiry as o general nature of articles
shipped and of their value before consents to carry them;
failure to do so cannot defeat shipper’s right to recovery of
full value of package if lost