Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

PROJECT : F1 PAGE :

CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Column Footing Design Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA DESIGN SUMMARY


COLUMN WIDTH c1 = 15 in FOOTING WIDTH B = 8.00 ft
COLUMN DEPTH c2 = 15 in FOOTING LENGTH L = 8.00 ft
COLUMN STRENGTH fc' = 3 ksi FOOTING THICKNESS T = 16 in
FOOTING CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 3 ksi MAIN LONGITUDINAL REINF: 14 # 5 ST. BARS
REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
AXIAL DEAD LOAD PDL = 138.484 k MAIN TRANSVERSE REINF : 13 # 5 ST. BARS
DEAD LOAD MOMENT MDL = 1.62 k-ft
AXIAL LIVE LOAD PLL = 40.63 k DOWEL BARS : 4 # 5
LIVE LOAD MOMENT MLL = 0.598 k-ft
LATERAL LOAD (0=WIND, 1=SEISMIC) = 1 Seismic
SEISMIC AXIAL LOAD PLAT = 23.75 k, IBC Eq.(16-28)
SEISMIC MOMENT MLAT = 26.83 k-ft, IBC Eq.(16-28)
SURCHARGE qs = 0 ksf
SOIL WEIGHT ws = 0.11 kcf
FOOTING EMBEDMENT DEPTH Df = 7 ft
FOOTING THICKNESS T = 16 in
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE Qa = 3 ksf
LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING # 5
TRANSVERSE REINFORCING # 5
DOWEL REINFORCING # 5
FOOTING WIDTH B = 8 ft
FOOTING LENGTH L = 8 ft

THE FOOTING DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
DESIGN LOADS (IBC 2000 SEC.1605.3.2 & ACI 318-02 SEC.9.2.1)
CASE 1: DL + LL P = 183 k 1.2 DL + 1.6 LL Pu = 231 k
M = 2 k-ft Mu = 3 k-ft
e = 0.01 ft, < (L / 6) eu = 0.01 ft, < (L / 6)
CASE 2: DL + LL + E / 1.4 P = 200 k 1.2 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 E Pu = 231 k
M = 21 k-ft Mu = 29 k-ft
e = 0.11 ft, < (L / 6) eu = 0.13 ft, < (L / 6)
CASE 3: 0.9 DL + E / 1.4 P = 145 k 0.9 DL + 1.0 E Pu = 148 k
M = 21 k-ft Mu = 28 k-ft
e = 0.14 ft, < (L / 6) eu = 0.19 ft, < (L / 6)

e max < 0.5 L , [Satisfactory]

CHECK SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.2.2)

  6e 
 P 1  L 
  
  q  0.15 
w s  T , for e 
L CASE 1 CASE 2 CASE 3
q MAX  BL
s
6 = 2.88 ksf, 2.93 ksf, 2.08 ksf

 q s   0.15  w s  T , for e 
2P L
 q MAX <
 3 B(0.5 L  e) 6 kQa, [Satisfactory]
where k = 1 for gravity loads, 4/3 for lateral loads.
DESIGN FOR FLEXURE (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, & 12.5)

 Mu  REINFORCING IN LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION


0.85 f 'c 1  1  
 0.383bd f c 
in
2
AS, L = 4.06

2 '

 REINFORCING IN TRANSVERSE DIRECTION


fy AS, T = 3.86 in
2

 0.85 1 f 87 
 4 
'

 MAX  0.75   T
  MIN  MIN  0.0018 , 
c

 f y
87  f y   d 3 
 
  
requird 0.075 d b f y
LONGITUDINAL TRANSVERSE
L d  MAX  , 12 in 
  provided  = 15.37 in , 15.74 in
'  K 
 f c  c  tr  
  db  

  0.02c b  d b f 
L dh  MAX  , 8d b , 6 in 
requird y LONGITUDINAL TRANSVERSE
  provided fc  = 8.97 in , 9.18 in
 
'

CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.5.2, 11.1.3.1, & 11.3)

LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION TRANSVERSE DIRECTION

V u,L  MAX
 71 kips < 2f Bd fc
'
V u,T  MAX
 68 kips < 2f Ld fc
'

[Satisfactory] [Satisfactory]
where f = 0.75 (ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )

CHECK PUNCHING SHEAR (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.5.2, 11.12.1.2, 11.12.6, & 11.13.5.3.2)

P u  R  0.5 v M ub1
v u ( psi ) 
J A P  2  b1  b2  d
AP
1
3 
d  d
2
   v  1
J   b1  1     3  b 2  2 b1
 6    b1   b1  1
3 b2
R  P u b1b 2 A f  BL
Af

v c ( psi )   2  y  fc
'
(v u ) max = 161 psi <
 4 d 
y  MIN  2, , 40 
 fv c = 164 psi [Satisfactory]
 c b0 

b0 
A P
, b1   c1  d  ,b 2   c 2  d  where f = 0.75 (ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )
d
CHECK LOADS TRANSFER AT COLUMN BASE (ACI 318-02 SEC.10.17.1, 15.8.2.1, 15.8.2.3, 12.3, & 9.3.2.4)

  MIN 
  c1  4d  c2  4d  , 2  f P n  0.85f f 'cc1c 2 = 746 kips > (P u ) max
 c1c 2 
  [Satisfactory]

 P u  0.85f f c c1c 2 
'

A db  MAX  0.005c1c 2 , 
 = where f = 0.65 (ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.4 )
ffy 1.13 in
2

 

  0.02d b f  
A S ,required
L d  MAX  MAX  , 0.0003 d b f  , 8 in  = 12.42 in < ( T-3 ) in
y

 A S , provided  f
y
 
   
'
c [Satisfactory]

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen