Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
FILED
SAN MATEO COUNTY
PETER B. (SBN 230148)
meg/511331}:
peter. morrison a en. com .
JUN 2 7 2018
1
OOQONUIAWNI—oxoooqasmawN—nc
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
;
Defendants. )
NNNNNNNNNHu—HH—HHHHI—
mammawn—oemqmmnuumc
Inc. (“Ripple”), XRP II, LLC (“XRP 11"), and Bradley Garlinghouse (collectively, “Defendants”)
WHEREAS Ripple was sub-served with the complaint on June 6, 2018, making Ripple’s
WHEREAS XRP II was served with the complaint on June 6, 2018, making XRP 11’s
WHEREAS, on June 18, 2018, counsel for the Defendants agreed to accepted service of the
complaint on behalf of Mr. Garlinghouse, making Mr. Garlinghouse’s response to the complaint
WHEREAS, this action is provisionally complex because it involves a putative class action
.
WHEREAS, a Complex Case Status Conference is scheduled Ein this action for August 8,
2018 at 9:00 a.m., at which it will be decided whether the case is complex and should be assigned
WHEREAS, the parties wish to (i) provide Defendants a uniform date to respond to the
NNNNNNNNN—IHFHHI—It—tHI—Il—l
complaint and (ii) ensure that, if this action is designated complex and assigned to a single judge
for all purposes, any motion or responsive pleading Defendants file in response to the complaint
munmamnuocmqa‘mauNn—e
1. The time for Defendants to answer, plead, or otherwise respond to the complaint is
defenses, motions, or objections that a party may have or make with respect tojurisdiction, venue
If r
//
By:
/
FLOM LLP ‘
as?"
‘
:59
PeterB. MorrisOn
WK???"
Attorneys for Defendants
Ripple Labs lnc., XRP ll, LLC, Bradley
Garlinghouse
J‘7
Ma...‘ '
By..
Mf
C ./
StephenJ. Oddo
fl04/ é“ 3%
,p‘
I
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
H
\OOO-dOyUl-hMN
v. 3
Q
RIPPLE LABS INC, et al., 3
)
3
Defendants. )
NNNNNNNNN—Hl—l—HI—I—HHH
QQGMAUNHOWMNQU’UHUNH:
orders as follows:
I. The time for Defendants to answer, plead, or otherwise respond to the complaint is
\DQQQUIJKUNH
2. Nothing herein shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any rights, claims,
defenses, motions, or objections that a party may have or make with respect to jurisdiction, venue
DATED:
IT [8 so ORDERED.
JUN 2 e 2018
fl/m
audit» the claims set forth in this action.
‘
NNNNNNNNN—HHHHI-lt-ll-IHH
aqamnumncwmqamauNn—c
2
STlPULATION AND WED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Q
PROOF OF SERVICE
16
17
18“ IE (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) Iam readily familiar with the firm's practice for the
daily collection and processing of correspondence for deliveries with the Federal Express delivery
19 service and the fact that the correspondence would be deposited with Federal Express that same
day in the ordinary course of business: on this date, the above-referenced document was placed for
20 deposit at Los Angeles, California and placed for collection and delivery following ordinary
business practices.
21
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is
22 true and correct;
24
Nandi Berglund
25 PRINT NANIE
26
27
28
2
PROOF OF SERVICE:
m, mm mm