Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

A study was made by a department store to determine A study was made by a department store to determine the relationship

the relationship between weekly sales and advertising between weekly sales and advertising expenditures. The following data
expenditures. The following data were recorded. Use r at were recorded. Use r at 0.05 level of significance.
0.05 level of significance.
Advertising Cost Sales Advertising Cost Sales
(in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos)
X Y X Y
4.0 38.5 4.0 38.5
2.0 40.1 2.0 40.1
2.5 39.5 2.5 39.5
2.0 36.5 2.0 36.5
5.0 44.0 5.0 44.0
5.5 55.0 5.5 55.0
1.5 20.5 1.5 20.5
3.0 41.5 3.0 41.5
2.0 42.0 2.0 42.0
2.5 48.0 2.5 48.0

A study was made by a department store to determine A study was made by a department store to determine the relationship
the relationship between weekly sales and advertising between weekly sales and advertising expenditures. The following data
expenditures. The following data were recorded. Use r at were recorded. Use r at 0.05 level of significance.
0.05 level of significance.
Advertising Cost Sales Advertising Cost Sales
(in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos)
X Y X Y
4.0 38.5 4.0 38.5
2.0 40.1 2.0 40.1
2.5 39.5 2.5 39.5
2.0 36.5 2.0 36.5
5.0 44.0 5.0 44.0
5.5 55.0 5.5 55.0
1.5 20.5 1.5 20.5
3.0 41.5 3.0 41.5
2.0 42.0 2.0 42.0
2.5 48.0 2.5 48.0

A study was made by a department store to determine A study was made by a department store to determine the relationship
the relationship between weekly sales and advertising between weekly sales and advertising expenditures. The following data
expenditures. The following data were recorded. Use r at were recorded. Use r at 0.05 level of significance.
0.05 level of significance.
Advertising Cost Sales Advertising Cost Sales
(in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos)
X Y X Y
4.0 38.5 4.0 38.5
2.0 40.1 2.0 40.1
2.5 39.5 2.5 39.5
2.0 36.5 2.0 36.5
5.0 44.0 5.0 44.0
5.5 55.0 5.5 55.0
1.5 20.5 1.5 20.5
3.0 41.5 3.0 41.5
2.0 42.0 2.0 42.0
2.5 48.0 2.5 48.0

A study was made by a department store to determine A study was made by a department store to determine the relationship
the relationship between weekly sales and advertising between weekly sales and advertising expenditures. The following data
expenditures. The following data were recorded. Use r at were recorded. Use r at 0.05 level of significance.
0.05 level of significance.
Advertising Cost Sales Advertising Cost Sales
(in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos)
X Y X Y
4.0 38.5 4.0 38.5
2.0 40.1 2.0 40.1
2.5 39.5 2.5 39.5
2.0 36.5 2.0 36.5
5.0 44.0 5.0 44.0
5.5 55.0 5.5 55.0
1.5 20.5 1.5 20.5
3.0 41.5 3.0 41.5
2.0 42.0 2.0 42.0
2.5 48.0 2.5 48.0
A study was made by a department store to determine A study was made by a department store to determine the relationship
the relationship between weekly sales and advertising between weekly sales and advertising expenditures. The following data
expenditures. The following data were recorded. Use r at were recorded. Use r at 0.05 level of significance.
0.05 level of significance.
Advertising Cost Sales Advertising Cost Sales
(in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos) (in thousand pesos)
X Y X Y
4.0 38.5 4.0 38.5
2.0 40.1 2.0 40.1
2.5 39.5 2.5 39.5
2.0 36.5 2.0 36.5
5.0 44.0 5.0 44.0
5.5 55.0 5.5 55.0
1.5 20.5 1.5 20.5
3.0 41.5 3.0 41.5
2.0 42.0 2.0 42.0
2.5 48.0 2.5 48.0

Ten subjects were given an attitude test on a controversial Ten subjects were given an attitude test on a controversial issue. Then
issue. Then they were shown a film favorable to the ten they were shown a film favorable to the ten subjects and the same
subjects and the same attitude test was administered. Use attitude test was administered. Use the test for correlated samples at
the test for correlated samples at 0.05 level of significance. 0.05 level of significance.

Pretest Posttest Pretest Posttest

16 20 16 20
18 20 18 20
16 24 16 24
24 28 24 28
20 20 20 20
25 30 25 30
22 23 22 23
18 24 18 24
15 19 15 19
15 15 15 15
Ten subjects were given an attitude test on a controversial Ten subjects were given an attitude test on a controversial issue. Then
issue. Then they were shown a film favorable to the ten they were shown a film favorable to the ten subjects and the same
subjects and the same attitude test was administered. Use attitude test was administered. Use the test for correlated samples at
the test for correlated samples at 0.05 level of significance. 0.05 level of significance.

Pretest Posttest Pretest Posttest

16 20 16 20
18 20 18 20
16 24 16 24
24 28 24 28
20 20 20 20
25 30 25 30
22 23 22 23
18 24 18 24
15 19 15 19
15 15 15 15
Ten subjects were given an attitude test on a controversial Ten subjects were given an attitude test on a controversial issue. Then
issue. Then they were shown a film favorable to the ten they were shown a film favorable to the ten subjects and the same
subjects and the same attitude test was administered. Use attitude test was administered. Use the test for correlated samples at
the test for correlated samples at 0.05 level of significance. 0.05 level of significance.

Pretest Posttest Pretest Posttest

16 20 16 20
18 20 18 20
16 24 16 24
24 28 24 28
20 20 20 20
25 30 25 30
22 23 22 23
18 24 18 24
15 19 15 19
15 15 15 15
Ten subjects were given an attitude test on a controversial Ten subjects were given an attitude test on a controversial issue. Then
issue. Then they were shown a film favorable to the ten they were shown a film favorable to the ten subjects and the same
subjects and the same attitude test was administered. Use attitude test was administered. Use the test for correlated samples at
the test for correlated samples at 0.05 level of significance. 0.05 level of significance.

Pretest Posttest Pretest Posttest

16 20 16 20
18 20 18 20
16 24 16 24
24 28 24 28
20 20 20 20
25 30 25 30
22 23 22 23
18 24 18 24
15 19 15 19
15 15 15 15

Ten subjects were given an attitude test on a controversial Ten subjects were given an attitude test on a controversial issue. Then
issue. Then they were shown a film favorable to the ten they were shown a film favorable to the ten subjects and the same
subjects and the same attitude test was administered. Use attitude test was administered. Use the test for correlated samples at
the test for correlated samples at 0.05 level of significance. 0.05 level of significance.

Pretest Posttest Pretest Posttest

16 20 16 20
18 20 18 20
16 24 16 24
24 28 24 28
20 20 20 20
25 30 25 30
22 23 22 23
18 24 18 24
15 19 15 19
15 15 15 15

The following table shows the number of mistakes made on The following table shows the number of mistakes made on 10
10 occasions by two compositors setting the type for a occasions by two compositors setting the type for a technical report.
technical report. At 0.05 level of significance use the t-test At 0.05 level of significance use the t-test for independent samples.
for independent samples.

Composition 1 Composition 2 Composition 1 Composition 2

10 15 10 15
13 10 13 10
9 15 9 15
11 7 11 7
12 13 12 13
12 11 12 11
14 12 14 12
8 9 8 9
13 10 13 10
11 10 11 10
The following table shows the number of mistakes made on The following table shows the number of mistakes made on 10
10 occasions by two compositors setting the type for a occasions by two compositors setting the type for a technical report.
technical report. At 0.05 level of significance use the t-test At 0.05 level of significance use the t-test for independent samples.
for independent samples.

Composition 1 Composition 2 Composition 1 Composition 2

10 15 10 15
13 10 13 10
9 15 9 15
11 7 11 7
12 13 12 13
12 11 12 11
14 12 14 12
8 9 8 9
13 10 13 10
11 10 11 10

The following table shows the number of mistakes made on The following table shows the number of mistakes made on 10
10 occasions by two compositors setting the type for a occasions by two compositors setting the type for a technical report.
technical report. At 0.05 level of significance use the t-test At 0.05 level of significance use the t-test for independent samples.
for independent samples.

Composition 1 Composition 2 Composition 1 Composition 2

10 15 10 15
13 10 13 10
9 15 9 15
11 7 11 7
12 13 12 13
12 11 12 11
14 12 14 12
8 9 8 9
13 10 13 10
11 10 11 10
The following table shows the number of mistakes made on The following table shows the number of mistakes made on 10
10 occasions by two compositors setting the type for a occasions by two compositors setting the type for a technical report.
technical report. At 0.05 level of significance use the t-test At 0.05 level of significance use the t-test for independent samples.
for independent samples.

Composition 1 Composition 2 Composition 1 Composition 2

10 15 10 15
13 10 13 10
9 15 9 15
11 7 11 7
12 13 12 13
12 11 12 11
14 12 14 12
8 9 8 9
13 10 13 10
11 10 11 10
The following table shows the number of mistakes made on The following table shows the number of mistakes made on 10
10 occasions by two compositors setting the type for a occasions by two compositors setting the type for a technical report.
technical report. At 0.05 level of significance use the t-test At 0.05 level of significance use the t-test for independent samples.
for independent samples.

Composition 1 Composition 2 Composition 1 Composition 2

10 15 10 15
13 10 13 10
9 15 9 15
11 7 11 7
12 13 12 13
12 11 12 11
14 12 14 12
8 9 8 9
13 10 13 10
11 10 11 10