Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to GeoJournal.
http://www.jstor.org
Decolonisation
withoutindependence
A.J.Christopher
DepartmentofGeography, ofPortElizabeth,P.O. Box 1600,PortElizabeth6000,SouthAfrica
University
(E-mail:ggaajc@upe.ac.za)
Received18 October2002; acceptedin revisedform7 April2003
Keywords:colonies,decolonisation, states
micro-states,
independence,
Abstract
The massivedecolonisationof thepostWorldWarII era resultedin a newpoliticalmap of theworld.The greatmajority
ofthenewindependent stateswereessentially coincidentwiththeformer administrativecolonies.However,in a quarterof
cases theendingofcolonialstatusdidnotresultintheemergence ofa sovereignstate.The colonialpowerssoughttoreduce
thenumber ofsmallandpotentiallyweakstatesbyvariousmechanisms. Thuscolonialmergers tookplace betweenadmin-
unitswithinthesameempire,and onlyoccasionallybetweenunitsin different
istrative empires.Some dependencies were
absorbedbymorepowerful neighbours and others
incorporated intothe structure
political of themetropolitanpower. Prior
to 1960,in termsofpopulationand size,thecolonieswhichfailedto achievestatehood at independenceweresubstantially
smallerthanthosewhichdid.Thereafter therewas littleto distinguishthem.The legacyofthemergedcolonieshas ranged
fromsuccessfulsecessionistmovements to integrated
states.
Colony state
Incorporating Population(000s) Areakm2 End colonial formstatus
Intra-iinperial
amalgamations independence in 1960 onlySenegaland theFrenchSudan
remainedwithintheFederation. The former withdrew only
Territorial amalgamations were usuallycarriedout within monthsafterindependence as a resultof personalconflicts
theconfinesof singleempires,wherecommonlanguages, overthecontrolof thestructures of thenew entity, which
economicandlegalsystems provideda degreeofuniformity.werethenelaboratedas disagreements overbasic socialand
Thusin 1957 theFederationof Malaya receivedindepend- economicpolicies.
ence fromGreatBritainwiththenineMalay statesultans The finalaccessionof Newfoundland to the Canadian
andrajasacceptinga rotating monarchy betweenthem.The Confederation in 1949 is anothercase relatedto theform-
further Britishmilitary withdrawal fromtheregion,allied ationofthefederalstatesbyoverseasWhitecommunities in
to a perceivedthreatof 'confrontation' fromIndonesialed theBritishEmpire.The briefera of 'independence'in the
theMalayanand Britishgovernments to devisea mutually 1930shad provedto be financially unsustainable and direct
favourable 5
plan (Fisher,1968). Thus a widerFederation colonialrulehad been reimposed(Long, 1999). The eco-
of Malaysiawas createdin 1963 incorporating theseparate nomicsituation was no betterafterWorldWarII, withGreat
coloniesof Singapore,Sarawakand NorthBorneo(Sabah), Britainunableto sustainindefinitely the servicingof the
whichwereregarded as incapableofattaining independence colonial debt incurred in dollars. The optionofjoiningthe
separately.6 The carefully calculateddemographic balance CanadianConfederation, whichhad been rejectedin 1867
betweenChinesedominatedSingaporeand thepotentially was at lastacceptedforeconomicreasons.
Malayassimilablepopulations ofthenorthern Borneocolon- Pre-decolonisation structures suchas thefederations of
ies was intendednot to disturbthe Malay politicaldom- theBritishWestIndiesandRhodesiaandNyasalandandthe
inanceof Malaya in thewidercombinedstructure (Porritt, politicalwingoftheEastAfrican commonservicesadminis-
1997).However,theextensive implications of the projection tration broke up before the formal grantof independence as
ofMalaydominance intotheeconomicspheremadetheplan a resultof themutualsuspicionsof local politiciansforced
unworkable andSingaporesecededtwoyearslater. intostructures by metropolitan politicians.Theytherefore
TheDutchdecolonisation ofTheNetherlands EastIndies soughtthe constitutional advancementof the constituent
in the 1940s was particularly bitterly foughtand constitu- colonies (Dale, 1962; Dikshit,1971). In additionSouth
tionallycomplex. At its conclusion, in 1949, West New Africacontinued todemandtheincorporation ofSouthWest
Guinea was retainedunderdirectcolonial rule as consti- Africa,Basutoland,BechuanalandProtectorate and Swazi-
tuting a distinctive society,separate from the remainder of land until its withdrawal from the Commonwealth in 1961
thearchipelago. The arrangement was disputedand in 1963 (Hyam, 1972). The colonial powers' fostering of larger
Indonesiagainedcontrolaftera briefinterim administrationunitswas thus frequently thwartedby those undergoing
by the United Nations, which had supported the Indone- decolonisation.
sian claim to theunityof thewholeof theformercolony
(Saltford, 2002). Thepromiseofself-determination forWest
New Guineaby 1969 was subverted intoa testofopinionof Inter-imperial amalgamations
1000tribalchiefsfavourable to theIndonesiangovernment.
The decolonisation of FernandoPoo and Rio Muniwas Territorial amalgamations acrossimperialboundarieshave
effected in 1969through themerger oftheSpanishmainland been subject to even more strainsand werecomparatively
the issues raised
and islandcoloniesintoa singleentity, EquatorialGuinea rare,reflecting by harmonising different,
It be noted that the admin- legal, economicand administrative systems and adopting a
(Liniger-Goumaz, 1979). might
istrative betweenthetwocolonieswas of recent common language of administration. The reconstitution of
separation
and that the of the main- Libya andMoroccoin the1950srepresented therestoration
origin following Spanishconquest
land,Rio Muni,thewholehadbeenadministered as a single of unity to countries temporarily in
fragmented thecolonial
unit,SpanishGuinea,until1959,whenthedistinctive nature era for strategic reasons, and therefore followedrarehistoric
of the island societyhad been recognised.Its survivalin precedents. The United States and the SovietUnion after
thepost-independence erahasplacedseverestrainsuponthe 1945 had no desire for the former Italian coloniesto remain
unifiedstate(Cusack,1997). under the control of Great Britain and France,as theformer
German and Turkish territories had done after1918.7The
Nominallyfederalstructures provedto be remarkably
over the fateof theformer
popularwith the colonial powers as a means of redu- complexpost-warnegotiations
Italian colonies therefore resulted in the thwarting ofBritish
cingthecostsof colonialadministration. The efficiency of
thecommonservicesoffered territorial ambitions (Trevaskis,1960).Libya became an in-
by thesuperstructures of the
FrenchWestAfricaandFrenchEquatorialAfricagovernor- dependent state with the aid of the United Nations, without
generalships inclinedtheFrenchto supporttheirretention. anyinterim trusteeship status(UnitedNations,1952). The
theoptionof independence had been offered three zones of Libya into whichthecountryhad been di-
Nevertheless,
at thelevel of theindividualcoloniesin the 1958 referen- vided during World War II, were reunitedwiththe Emir
dumon thenew FifthRepublicconstitution as a resultof of Cyrenaicaeffectively assumingcontrolof theothertwo,
British and Frenchoccupied
pressuresfromAfricanpoliticalleaders.Hence theFrench namely occupiedTripolitania
theFederation ofMali as thesuccessorto French Fezzan.
promoted
WestAfrica(Skurnik, The rise of Arab nationalismand thecomplexcontest
1967).However, bythetimeofformal
overtheMiddleEastforcedtheretreat ofthecolonialpowers
Source:Statesman's
Yearbooksandareastatistics.