Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. YES, the act is exempt from criminal liablity. “Under such circumstances, there is no criminal liability,
provided always that the alleged ignorance or mistake was not due to negligence or bad faith.”
2. According to Spanish jurist Pacheco, “voluntary” as used in Article 1 of the Penal Code means that,
“without intention, there can be no crime.” (For simplicity, “voluntary,” “intent,” “wilful,” and “malice,”
are more or less the same).
3. The above reasoning is confirmed by the legal maxims (“ancient wisdom of the law”): (1) facit reum nisi
mens sit rea (“the act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intention were so”), and (2) Actus me
invite factus non est meus actus (“an act done by me against my will is not my act”).
4. ON THE OTHER HAND, there is the doctrine Ignorantia juris non excusat (“Ignorance of the law excuses
no man”). “The courts have recognized the power of the legislature to forbid, in limited class of cases,
the doing of certain acts, and to make their commission criminal without regard to the intent of the
doer.”
5. WITH ALL THE LATIN PHRASES MENTIONED, THE COURT HELD THAT IT WILL FOLLOW THIS ONE:
Ignorantia facti excusat (“Ignorance or mistake in point of fact is, in all cases of supposed offense, a
sufficient excuse”).
The judgment of conviction and the sentence imposed by the trial court should be reversed, Article 568 of the Penal Code
and the defendant acquitted of the crime with which he is charged and his bail bond He who shall execute through reckless
exonerated, with the cost of both instances de oficio. negligence an act that, if done with
malice, would constitute a grave crime,
So ordered. shall be punished with the penalty of
arresto mayor in its maximum degree,
DISSENTING OPINION: (I think this is worthy of mentioning because the court could have really held to prision correccional in its minimum
otherwise and could still justify just as well as they did with their original order) degree, and with arresto mayor in its
minimum and medium degrees if it
Torres, J. HELD THAT: shall constitute a less grave crime.
[xxx]
1. The defendant was guilty of negligence and the act done by the deceased could not have warranted the
act done to him by the defendant despite the defendant’s belief that the deceased was a malefactor.
2. In accordance to Penal Code Article 568, the defendant must have a penalty of prision correccional.