Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Gordon DSouza
July 28, 2018
Introduction
• Private equity investment professional (11+ years)
• Individual investor in Indian capital markets for 14+ years
Disclosures
2
Key Questions
Are growth assumptions reasonable? Infratel likely to get disproportionate share of new tenancies:
• Limited options due to Tower Co consolidation
• RoFR with 2/3 relevant operators
Key risks:
• Jio’s strategy
• Reduction in rentals / renewals
• Solvency issues for Voda-Idea
• Regulatory (Active Infrastructure Sharing) 3
Towers are good cash flow and ROCE business
Telecom operator owns all the “active” Geographical advantage. New towers within an
equipment: Radio, antenna, Cables, BTS Comp existing towers coverage radius will not be able
advantage to match rates without sacrificing economics
Tower Co owns the “passive” infra: Tower Single tenant / captive tower is not capital
structure, shed, battery, generator, etc
efficient or viable for an operator
*Some TowerCos like Infratel have a cost plus model and hence make a spread
** Pass through revenue includes rentals for high rental sites or power / fuel beyond agreed terms
4
*** MSA: Master Services Agreement agreed between Telecom Operator and Tower Company
Infratel and Indus have announced a merger
Pre-merger Post-merger
Key shareholders
Bharti Airtel (53%) Bharti Infratel
Public (46%)
Shareholding Pattern*
Bharti Airtel (34% - 37%)
Vodafone (27% - 29%)
Indus Towers
42% Idea (0% - 7%)
Providence (1% - 3%)
Public (29% - 32%)
Key shareholders
Bharti Infratel (42%)
Vodafone (42%) Indus Towers
Idea (11%)
Providence (5%)
Pre-merger Post-merger
w/Indus Tower Pan-India coverage across all circles
Towers 91,451 163,162
Largest tower company in the world
Tenancies 205,596 367,073 outside China
*Post‐merger, based on certain shareholders electing to settle with cash vs shares 6
Key Questions
Are growth assumptions reasonable? Infratel likely to get disproportionate share of new tenancies:
• Limited options due to Tower Co consolidation
• RoFR with 2/3 relevant operators
Key risks:
• Jio’s strategy
• Reduction in rentals / renewals
• Solvency issues for Voda-Idea
• Regulatory (Active Infrastructure Sharing) 7
India has one of the slowest telecom networks in the world
19% 372
28 Tata
17% Idea 214
11% 18%
243 8%
8% 345
194 6% 10%
172 5%
222 206
109 1%
86 83 116
61 51
14 0
R-Jio
Airtel
Idea
Com+Sistema
Tata
Vodafone
BSNL / MTNL
Aircel
Others
Telenor
Airtel
R-Jio
BSNL / MTNL
Voda+Idea
R-
Co-locations 285
(‘000)
1.8x 1.0x 1.3x 1.9x 1.9x 2.0x
143 70 86 53 15 12
1.1x Captives
Towers 1.5x 163
2.2x Potential M&A
(‘000) 62
146 78 1.0x 1.6x candidates
91 1.9x 1.4x
1.4x 1.2x 1.5x
18 24 78
20 13 70 66
59 13 9 9
52
40 28
18 15 11 9 9 8 6
7 6
Infratel / Indus
ATC
R-Com+R-Jio
GTL
BSNL
Ascend
TowerVision
ATC
Idea
Vodafone
R-Com
GTL
Infratel /
BSNL
Viom
TowerVisio
Ascend
Aircel
Indus
11.0
6.3
5.0
3.9
3.0
2.4
0.3
1.1
0.79 0.85 0.84 4G 3G 2G
600 50 mn customers
VDSL-CO connect
500
• India households ~267 mn
FTTC/VDSL pass
400 FTTB/dp/VDSL pass • Above plan will technically cost
300
FTTx/VDSL connect $100 bn
200
FTTB/LAN pass • Cost of FTTH ($300-
100
FTTB/LAN connect 500/household)
0
FTTH/GPON pass • Cost escalates significantly
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Potential implications:
Right of Way (RoW), managing multiple local permissions Less aggressive and select Fibre
2 Roll-Out
and infrastructure management issues
Priority to Mobile
1,40,000
As data usage
Gain subscriber market share increases, tower
coverage
Enhance 4G capacity
reduces by ~20-
Roll out FTTH 25%
50,000
15
Key Questions
Are growth assumptions reasonable? Infratel likely to get disproportionate share of new tenancies:
• Limited options due to Tower Co consolidation
• RoFR with 2/3 relevant operators
Key risks:
• Jio’s strategy
• Reduction in rentals / renewals
• Solvency issues for Voda-Idea
• Regulatory (Active Infrastructure Sharing) 16
Despite a fairly reasonable financial performance in a consolidating sector …
AFFO is Adjusted Fund Flow from Operations (ie Cash Flow adjusted for Maintenance capex) 17
... Negative perception of sector has adversely impacted stock price …
18
… As also have certain technical issues
Overhang of Airtel’s and • Airtel has been monetising its stake to raise capital for debt
other shareholders stake retirement / fighting Jio
• Post merger, other shareholders are also likely to sell / monetise
19
Growth is not priced in this valuation …
Note: DCF assumes that Infratel will deploy FCF at the discount rate – however Infratel has
maintained a 30%+ ROCE, ROCE on incremental capex is higher
* EV / Tenancy x Tenancies
** Enterprise Value (EV) less Net Debt 20
… And is in line with recent forced sales of far lower quality
EV/ EV/
Buyer Seller Date Towers Tenancies EBITDA Tenancies
TTM x Rs lakhs
2nd innings
Mar-17 ~89,800 ~198,000 ~10x ~33
for KKR
Strategic
Oct-15 ~40,000 ~97,000 ~11x ~23
investor
Are growth assumptions reasonable? Infratel likely to get disproportionate share of new tenancies:
• Limited options due to Tower Co consolidation
• RoFR with 2/3 relevant operators
Key risks:
• Jio’s strategy
• Reduction in rentals / renewals
• Solvency issues for Voda-Idea
• Regulatory (Active Infrastructure Sharing) 22
Quick Re-cap
4G user using 11GB/month today
23
Each operator will need ~4-5 lakh sites in 5 years to adequately provide 4G
Coverage Capacity
Additional
Sites Sites 70-100k 440-500k
4G sites
required for required for Current
required 70-100k
2G coverage 4G coverage 4G sites
for
per operator per operator 70-100k
coverage
230k
Airtel 180k 50k
Voda- 180k 230k 170k 60k
Idea
Translates into 12-15 lakh site requirement for all 3 operators by FY23
24
Infratel/Indus can get ~66% share of new tenancies in an oligopolistic market
300k 1230k
15% tenancy
volume CAGR
950k
-200k 180k
-50k
700k in FY19
4G coverage
consolidation
4G capacity
FY23 sites
Voda-Idea
Voda-Idea
Loss Pre-
losses
Pre-
R-Jio tenancies will be split between Indus/Infratel, ATC and others smaller players
25
There is significant scope of telecom infrastructure management beyond 2023
Source: Indus Towers
26
At what points should we re-evaluate our thesis (1/2)
Current View:
Incremental Jio customers are going to have higher acquisition costs
$10 bn FTTH plan could cause revision of 50% plan to ~30%
May in reality target 30% share (another 6-9 months) before stabilizing
ARPU
• Reduction in rentals Jio’s strategy, financial pressure could force Airtel / Voda-Idea to drive
/ renewals hard bargains on renewals
Current View:
Operators don’t have choice due to tower co consolidation, RoFR
Infratel remains Airtel’s / Vodafones last valuable and monetisable asset
for funding 4G and later 5G rollout
27
At what points should we re-evaluate our thesis (2/2)
• Solvency Issues • Stretched balance sheet, network quality behind R-Jio & Airtel, Vodafone
wrt Voda-Idea non-commital
• Voda-Idea could lag network roll-outs or shut down resulting in India
becoming a 2 player market
Current View:
• No large market in the world is a two player market
• In worst case, Voda-Idea could be acquired. Though there is a risk that roll-
outs could be slower
• Regulatory changes • Active Infrastructure sharing (sharing of radio and antenna capacity) if
wrt Tower Cos introduced could free up significant capacity
Current View:
• Operators especially the market leader is unlikely to support such a move
as it will affect them most
28
Idea execution
• Risk of being early in the trade, decent probability of no significant triggers playing out in next 6-9 months
• Voda-Idea overlap of tenancies will resolve as integration is undertaken, could keep stock price depressed
• Airtel and other shareholders (Vodafone, Idea, Providence) are likely to keep diluting stake to fund 4G, 5G,
FTTH roll-outs. Could have an overhang on stock price
• Better to spread initial buying over few quarters and track tenancy growth before increasing position size
gdsouza@gmail.com