String Theory Only Game in Town Tests

© All Rights Reserved

Als PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

1 Aufrufe

String Theory Only Game in Town Tests

© All Rights Reserved

Als PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

- Electron Configurations Pre AP
- An Inhomogeneous Toy-model of the Quantum Gravity With Explicitly Evolvable Observables 1107.2224v1
- Classical Statistics and Quantum Statistics
- Simonyi Kroly.A Cultural History of Physics
- Conventionality and relationality in relativistic space-time (R. Alemañ)
- Quantum Gravity - Maranhao State University
- Interstellar 03
- Supersymmetry May Show Up at the New Run of LHC’: The Hindu - Mobile Edition
- Laplace Transforms
- भारत क्या है -- -Hindi
- The Beginning of the World From the Point of View of Quantum Theory
- m274
- Growth in the Combined Net Worth of Billionaires From 2000-2013: An Interesting Limit to Growth is Revealed
- No Ether
- ijp-1-6-4
- Matt Visser- Traversable wormholes: the Roman ring
- Vijay Balasubramanian, Per Kraus and Masaki Shigemori- Massless black holes and black rings as effective geometries of the D1–D5 system
- MPitkanen TGD Overview 02 Quantum Evol
- Editorial note to "The Beginning of the world from the point of view of quantum theory" - Luminet - 2011
- F. D. M. Haldane.pdf

Sie sind auf Seite 1von 7

Researchers are demonstrating that, in certain contexts, string theory is the only consistent theory

of quantum gravity. Might this make it true?

By Natalie Wolchover

In

universes with a fisheye geometry known as anti-de Sitter space, string theory has been shown to

provide the only consistent way to reconcile gravity and quantum mechanics.

Thirty years have passed since a pair of physicists, working together on a stormy summer night in

Aspen, Colo., realized that string theory might have what it takes to be the “theory of everything.”

“We must be getting pretty close,” Michael Green recalls telling John Schwarz as the thunder raged

and they hammered away at a proof of the theory’s internal consistency, “because the gods are

trying to prevent us from completing this calculation.”

Their mathematics that night suggested that all phenomena in nature, including the seemingly

irreconcilable forces of gravity and quantum mechanics, could arise from the harmonics of tiny,

vibrating loops of energy, or “strings.” The work touched off a string theory revolution and spawned

a generation of specialists who believed they were banging down the door of the ultimate theory of

Quanta Magazine

nature. But today, there’s still no answer. Because the strings that are said to quiver at the core of

elementary particles are too small to detect — probably ever — the theory cannot be experimentally

confirmed. Nor can it be disproven: Almost any observed feature of the universe jibes with the

strings’ endless repertoire of tunes.

The publication of Green and Schwarz’s paper “was 30 years ago this month,” the string theorist and

popular-science author Brian Greene wrote in Smithsonian Magazine in January, “making the

moment ripe for taking stock: Is string theory revealing reality’s deep laws? Or, as some detractors

have claimed, is it a mathematical mirage that has sidetracked a generation of physicists?” Greene

had no answer, expressing doubt that string theory will “confront data” in his lifetime.

Recently, however, some string theorists have started developing a new tactic that gives them hope

of someday answering these questions. Lacking traditional tests, they are seeking validation of

string theory by a different route. Using a strange mathematical dictionary that translates between

laws of gravity and those of quantum mechanics, the researchers have identified properties called

“consistency conditions” that they say any theory combining quantum mechanics and gravity must

meet. And in certain highly simplified imaginary worlds, they claim to have found evidence that the

only consistent theories of “quantum gravity” involve strings.

According to many researchers, the work provides weak but concrete support for the decades-old

suspicion that string theory may be the only mathematically consistent theory of quantum gravity

capable of reproducing gravity’s known form on the scale of galaxies, stars and planets, as captured

by Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity. And if string theory is the only possible approach,

then its proponents say it must be true — with or without physical evidence. String theory, by this

account, is “the only game in town.”

“Proving that a big class of stringlike models are the only things consistent with general relativity

and quantum mechanics would be a way, to some extent, of confirming it,” said Tom Hartman, a

theoretical physicist at Cornell University who has been following the recent work.

If they are successful, the researchers acknowledge that such a proof will be seen as controversial

evidence that string theory is correct. “‘Correct’ is a loaded word,” said Mukund Rangamani, a

professor at Durham University in the United Kingdom and the co-author of a paper posted recently

to the physics preprint site arXiv.org that finds evidence of “string universality” in a class of

imaginary universes.

the only “game” meeting certain conditions in “towns” wildly different from our universe, but they

are optimistic that their techniques will generalize to somewhat more realistic physical worlds. “We

will continue to accumulate evidence for the ‘string universality’ conjecture in different settings and

for different classes of theories,” said Alex Maloney, a professor of physics at McGill University in

Montreal and co-author of another recent paper touting evidence for the conjecture, “and eventually

Quanta Magazine

Meanwhile, outside experts caution against jumping to conclusions based on the findings to date.

“It’s clear that these papers are an interesting attempt,” said Matt Strassler, a visiting professor at

Harvard University who has worked on string theory and particle physics. “But these aren’t really

proofs; these are arguments. They are calculations, but there are weasel words in certain places.”

Proponents of string theory’s rival, an underdog approach called “loop quantum gravity,” believe

that the work has little to teach us about the real world. “They should try to solve the problems of

their theory, which are many,” said Carlo Rovelli, a loop quantum gravity researcher at the Center

for Theoretical Physics in Marseille, France, “instead of trying to score points by preaching around

that they are ‘the only game in town.’”

Mystery Theory

Over the past century, physicists have traced three of the four forces of nature — strong, weak and

electromagnetic — to their origins in the form of elementary particles. Only gravity remains at large.

Albert Einstein, in his theory of general relativity, cast gravity as smooth curves in space and time:

An apple falls toward the Earth because the space-time fabric warps under the planet’s weight. This

picture perfectly captures gravity on macroscopic scales.

But in small enough increments, space and time lose meaning, and the laws of quantum mechanics

— in which particles have no definite properties like “location,” only probabilities — take over.

Physicists use a mathematical framework called quantum field theory to describe the probabilistic

interactions between particles. A quantum theory of gravity would describe gravity’s origin in

particles called “gravitons” and reveal how their behavior scales up to produce the space-time

curves of general relativity. But unifying the laws of nature in this way has proven immensely

difficult.

String theory first arose in the 1960s as a possible explanation for why elementary particles called

quarks never exist in isolation but instead bind together to form protons, neutrons and other

composite “hadrons.” The theory held that quarks are unable to pull apart because they form the

ends of strings rather than being free-floating points. But the argument had a flaw: While some

hadrons do consist of pairs of quarks and anti-quarks and plausibly resemble strings, protons and

neutrons contain three quarks apiece, invoking the ugly and uncertain picture of a string with three

ends. Soon, a different theory of quarks emerged. But ideas die hard, and some researchers,

including Green, then at the University of London, and Schwarz, at the California Institute of

Technology, continued to develop string theory.

Problems quickly stacked up. For the strings’ vibrations to make physical sense, the theory calls for

many more spatial dimensions than the length, width and depth of everyday experience, forcing

string theorists to postulate that six extra dimensions must be knotted up at every point in the fabric

of reality, like the pile of a carpet. And because each of the innumerable ways of knotting up the

extra dimensions corresponds to a different macroscopic pattern, almost any discovery made about

our universe can seem compatible with string theory, crippling its predictive power. Moreover, as

things stood in 1984, all known versions of string theory included a nonsensical mathematical term

known as an “anomaly.”

Quanta Magazine

vibration mode of the string fit the profile of a graviton, the coveted quantum purveyor of gravity.

And on that stormy night in Aspen in 1984, Green and Schwarz discovered that the graviton

contributed a term to the equations that, for a particular version of string theory, exactly canceled

out the problematic anomaly. The finding raised the possibility that this version was the one, true,

mathematically consistent theory of quantum gravity, and it helped usher in a surge of activity

known as the “first superstring revolution.”

But only a year passed before another version of string theory was also certified anomaly-free. In all,

five consistent string theories were discovered by the end of the decade. Some conceived of particles

as closed strings, others described them as open strings with dangling ends, and still others

generalized the concept of a string to higher-dimensional objects known as “D-branes,” which

resemble quivering membranes in any number of dimensions. Five string theories seemed an

embarrassment of riches.

The next major breakthrough came in 1995, when Edward Witten of the Institute for Advanced

Study in Princeton, N.J., argued in a famous lecture that all five string theories were mathematically

connected and must be pieces of the same all-encompassing master theory. Witten named it M-

theory. The M seems to have originally referred to membranes, but Witten has intimated that the

true meaning of M awaits a better understanding of the theory, which seems to surpass the sum of

its known parts. “There was a running joke that it stood for ‘mystery,’” said Steve Carlip, a quantum

gravity specialist at the University of California, Davis. Whatever M stands for, this mother of all

manifestations of string theory restored the dream of unification.

he argued that the five known string theories are different pieces of a single master framework,

later dubbed “M-theory.”

“People had spent decades studying different types of string theories and found there were only a

few consistent ones and they were the same thing,” Strassler said. “You could say, maybe that’s the

only thing that can exist. Maybe there’s only one quantum gravity theory, and M-theory is it.”

Quanta Magazine

Fisheye Universes

Two years after Witten’s proposal of M-theory, the Argentinian-American physicist Juan Maldacena

found yet another surprising relationship, this time between strings and point particles. Maldacena’s

work suggested that under certain conditions, a theory that includes gravity, be it string theory or

otherwise, can be directly translated into a quantum field theory that does not have gravity.

In the theory’s simplest manifestation, the “certain conditions” require an imaginary landscape

known as anti-de Sitter (AdS) space, which resembles graph paper viewed through a fisheye lens,

with the squares getting smaller and smaller toward the boundary. A theory that describes how

gravity works in an AdS space can be translated into an equivalent “conformal field theory” (CFT)

representing point particles on that universe’s boundary. This connection enables researchers to

study quantum gravity by probing the corresponding CFT. For example, they can play around with

CFTs to calculate properties of quantum gravity theories in “AdS3” space — a fisheye universe with

two spatial dimensions plus time. “The goal of finding quantum gravity in AdS3 could be translated

into finding the right conformal field theory,” said Rangamani.

In the two most recent papers, posted within days of each other in December, separate groups led

by Rangamani and Maloney set out to study the fundamental objects (whether they be strings or

otherwise) in a class of simple AdS3 universes. They found that as these universes get extremely hot,

the objects within them will go through an exponentially increasing number of possible “states.”

This behavior is exactly what one would expect if strings were the fundamental objects in these

universes. A hotter universe allows strings to vibrate and arrange themselves in new ways, and so a

hot, stringy universe will have lots of states. Point particles, by contrast, exhibit far less variety at

high temperatures. “We’re getting a stringy number of states,” said Christoph Keller, a postdoctoral

fellow in physics at Rutgers University and co-author of one paper with Maloney and Alex Belin. “In

principle it’s conceivable there’s another theory out there that isn’t string theory that also has a lot

of states. We don’t know any such example.”

Some argue that this orchestra of states at high temperatures strengthens the case for the

universality of string or “stringlike” quantum gravity theories in AdS3. “No one is going so far as

saying that string theory is the only thing that can come out of these consistency conditions, but

there’s evidence that it’s stringlike stuff,” Hartman said.

The “weasel words” in the authors’ arguments, according to Strassler, skirt around the fact that they

did not calculate the exact density of states in some of the more complicated cases but merely

showed that the number was higher than expected for a universe composed of point particles. “And

just finding a stringy density of states — I don’t know if there’s a proof in that,” Strassler said. “This

is just one property.”

Meanwhile, loop quantum gravity researchers object to the very premise that the results about AdS3

give any hint whatsoever about the nature of quantum gravity in our own universe. They note that

the AdS/CFT correspondence itself has not been proven — it is only a conjecture (albeit one with

wide support). More importantly, AdS space differs greatly from flat space, and universes with two

spatial dimensions are far simpler than those with three. “The world is not 2+1-dimensional,” said

Lee Smolin, a founding and senior faculty member at the Perimeter Institute in Waterloo, Ontario,

and one of the founders of loop quantum gravity. “And even in that case, there have existed for a

long time counterexamples to the string universality conjecture, in the form of completely worked

out formulations of quantum gravity which have nothing to do with string theory.” (String theorists

argue that these particular 2+1 gravity theories differ from quantum gravity in the real world in an

important way.)

https://www.quantamagazine.org/string-theory-only-game-in-town-tests-20150218/ February 18, 2015

Quanta Magazine

Mukund

Rangamani, left, and Felix Haehl of Durham University have argued that all consistent quantum

gravity theories in certain two-dimensional universes are stringlike theories.

Yet researchers have also applied the AdS/CFT correspondence to quantum gravity in AdS4 — a

fisheye universe, but one with the same number of dimensions as our own. In 2011, Maldacena, now

a professor at the Institute for Advanced Study, and his student at the time, Alexander Zhiboedov,

found evidence that string theories are the only quantum gravity theories with a

particular feature that reproduce general relativity at large scales. The researchers went further in a

2014 paper, arguing that in any number of dimensions and space-time geometries, only theories

with a certain stringlike property satisfy causality, or the notion that causes precede effects. “This is

what you would expect based on the hypothesis that string theory is the only game in town,” said

Zhiboedov, who is now a postdoctoral researcher at Harvard University.

The results to date appear to support the existence of “stringlike” theories, at least circumstantially.

According to string theorists, stringlike theories seem somewhat likely to be string theories, as it’s

difficult to picture an object that vibrates like a string but isn’t one. But then, what counts as string

theory, anyway? What is M-theory? Critics have pointed out that no one knows how to use M-theory

to answer all the questions one can ask about quantum gravity, or to show how nature works in all

situations. String theorists might become convinced that they’re banging on the right door, without

learning what, exactly, lies behind it.

So far, they have picked and chosen special, mathematically tractable testing grounds for their

calculations. “There’s nothing wrong with that,” said Carlip, who considers himself a “nonaligned”

quantum gravity specialist. In experimental physics, “you do the experiments you can do and not the

ones you can’t.” The question, Carlip said, is “to what extent the results are general properties of

quantum gravity, and to what extent they are the result of these particular simplifications.”

String theorists seem to expect that stringy results will keep appearing when they apply the

AdS/CFT tool to more general classes of imaginary worlds. (They say they would be equally excited

to find evidence against string universality.) A full proof that every theory of quantum gravity in AdS

space is a theory with strings would be, according to Maloney, “extremely strong evidence” that the

Quanta Magazine

Proof in flat universes will require completely new tools, however. Our universe does not have a

spatial boundary as AdS space does; its boundary lies at the future end of time. The development of

an AdS/CFT-like tool for our universe’s geometry remains in its infancy. The road to a full proof — or

refutation — of string universality is long. Right now, Zhiboedov said, “this is a belief, a dream, an

expectation. It’s a feeling based on work in this field.”

Correction: This article was revised on February 21, 2015, to correct Lee Smolin’s title. He is a

founding and senior faculty member at the Perimeter Institute in Waterloo, Ontario.

Note: This article was updated on March 1, 2015, to provide additional context about 2+1 quantum

gravity theories.

- Electron Configurations Pre APHochgeladen vonvishakhshukla
- An Inhomogeneous Toy-model of the Quantum Gravity With Explicitly Evolvable Observables 1107.2224v1Hochgeladen vonforizsl
- Classical Statistics and Quantum StatisticsHochgeladen vonGayathri Shunmugiah
- Simonyi Kroly.A Cultural History of PhysicsHochgeladen vonJoaquin
- Conventionality and relationality in relativistic space-time (R. Alemañ)Hochgeladen vonraalbeautor
- Quantum Gravity - Maranhao State UniversityHochgeladen vonJaenudin Jay
- Interstellar 03Hochgeladen vonAnuprava Bokshi
- Supersymmetry May Show Up at the New Run of LHC’: The Hindu - Mobile EditionHochgeladen vonsyedmohammad121
- Laplace TransformsHochgeladen vonAthar Kharal
- भारत क्या है -- -HindiHochgeladen vonSalil Gewali
- The Beginning of the World From the Point of View of Quantum TheoryHochgeladen vonMarcelo Yates
- m274Hochgeladen vonEpic Win
- Growth in the Combined Net Worth of Billionaires From 2000-2013: An Interesting Limit to Growth is RevealedHochgeladen vonVJLaxmanan
- No EtherHochgeladen vonJavier Alonso
- ijp-1-6-4Hochgeladen vonTomas Kyso Kyselica
- Matt Visser- Traversable wormholes: the Roman ringHochgeladen vonRtpom
- Vijay Balasubramanian, Per Kraus and Masaki Shigemori- Massless black holes and black rings as effective geometries of the D1–D5 systemHochgeladen vonJuazmant
- MPitkanen TGD Overview 02 Quantum EvolHochgeladen vonAnas Abdel Rihem
- Editorial note to "The Beginning of the world from the point of view of quantum theory" - Luminet - 2011Hochgeladen vonstickygreenman
- F. D. M. Haldane.pdfHochgeladen vonHamid iqbal
- A Proposal for a Bohmian Ontology of Quantum GravityHochgeladen vonszobel123
- Quantum Computing - Google DocsHochgeladen vonToshi Parmar
- a_Matrix_Model_Representation_of_the_Int.pdfHochgeladen vonIñaki Aguirre
- stodolna2013.pdfHochgeladen vonAladino Abbas
- Syll Sample Jrf(Pam) Phb 2014Hochgeladen vonRavikanth
- The search for Primordial Quark Nuggets among Near Earth AsteroidsHochgeladen vonardeegee
- Book1-1Hochgeladen vonNeng
- Brain and Mathematics T-227Hochgeladen vonforizsl
- Quantum MagnetoHidrodynamicsHochgeladen vonDeath Anonimatum
- 01Hochgeladen vonJason Jiwook Kang

- The Octonion Math That Could Underpin PhysicsHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- The Four Prejudices Underlying Our CrisesHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- The Hunt for Earths Deep Hidden OceansHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Policy_Creation_to_Policy_Management_Dev.pdfHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Braswell. Kushner. Suicide Social Integration and Masculinity in the US Military.Hochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Harmansah_Omur_2015._ISIS_Heritage_and_t.pdfHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Once More With Feeling Queer ActivistHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Hyperuniformity Found in Birds Math and PhysicsHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Out in PhysicsHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- CASS Gay RightsHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Foucault and the Imagination the RolesHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Corporeal_Legacies_in_the_US_South_Memor.pdfHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Strange Numbers Found in Particle CollisionsHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Law_and_Emotion.pdfHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Coder Physicists Are Simulating the Universe to Unlock Its SecretsHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Beyond_Simplicity_The_Late_Prehistory_of.pdfHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Nima Arkani Hamed and the Future of PhysicsHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Choosy Eggs May Pick Sperm for Their Genes Defying Mendels LawHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Waiting for a SignHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Sau Lan Wus Three Major Physics Discoveries and Counting 20180718Hochgeladen vonckrich_991960
- What No New Particles Means for PhysicsHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Why Nature Prefers Couples Even for YeastHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- In_the_Shadow_of_Empire_States_in_an_Ott.pdfHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Magic_Realism_and_Real_Politics_Massimo.pdfHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Spyglass User Guide.enHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- This is a Compilation of the Last 21Hochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Limits of the law Human Rights and the Emancipation of SexualHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Design Parameters to Parametric DesignHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Writing_Material_Culture_History.pdfHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- Beginning_with_oneself_Knowledge_underst.pdfHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales

- Physical Interpretation of the 26 Dimensions of Bosonic String TheoryHochgeladen vonabhkashyap
- [Page, D.N.] Anthropic Estimates for Many Parameters of Physics and AstronomyHochgeladen vonlev76
- blackettHochgeladen vonFebruary Mailbox
- CitationsHochgeladen vonRosario Turco
- Scientific American - September 2014Hochgeladen vonmarcosdantas171
- String Theory Only Game in Town TestsHochgeladen vonSilvino González Morales
- YasserHochgeladen vonlatintoss
- cmip03c.pdfHochgeladen vonluishipp
- From Cosmism to Deism | KurzweilAIHochgeladen vonJeffrey W. Danese
- A Cyclic Model of the UniverseHochgeladen vonmjherman
- String TheoryHochgeladen vonzuzu_zuzu96
- Response to Stephen Hawking’s Physics-as-Philosophy, by Wolfgang SmithHochgeladen vondemonsbane
- Destiny Matrix 2012 Jack SarfattiHochgeladen vonDavid Fernando López Torres
- HyperspaceHochgeladen vonFried M. Khan
- John Desalvo Special ReportHochgeladen vonYves
- The 6th Sun and the ReEvolution of Love and ConsciousnessHochgeladen vonarodhall
- 0907.3987v2Hochgeladen vonJack Ignacio Nahmías
- Origin 1 The OmniverseHochgeladen vonSUPERALEXtheGREATEST
- HolmesHochgeladen vontheosophy2010
- The Reference Frame_ Nice Try but I Am Now 99% Confident That Atiyah's Proof of RH is Wrong, HopelessHochgeladen vonsurjit4123
- 303-955-1-PBHochgeladen vonBrunoSioQue
- cvHochgeladen vonAhmad Jpr
- Hawking - Strings and M-TheoryHochgeladen vonahmedkq1974
- String Theory: The Theory of EverythingHochgeladen vonxitzyourfearx
- Gregory W. Moore - Physical Mathematics and the FutureHochgeladen vonPedro Figueroa
- Gerald B. Cleaver- The Multiverse —Next Step in Our Growing Understanding of Reality?Hochgeladen vonPogz1995
- Nucl.Phys.B v.577Hochgeladen vonbuddy72
- 08 Making Room for Mental SpaceHochgeladen vonMind Reading
- Origins of the Universe and the Solar SystemHochgeladen vonLarry James Canda
- Ivan Dugic - I Ching as the Model of the PsycheHochgeladen vonWayne Campbell