Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Sarmiento III
Buried Bodies
Garrow who was charged and convicted of first degree murder and rape, and the
ethical dilemma of his two defense lawyers his Frank Armani and Francis
Belge. The problem arises when a confession of the harrowing details of the
crimes committed by the defendant made under the mantle of Lawyer- Client
confidentiality was put to the public scrutiny. Under our laws the lawyer-client
relationship is fiduciary in nature, our Supreme Court ruled time and again such
as in the case of Aninon vs. Sabitsana “that the relationship between a lawyer
and his/her client should ideally be imbued with the highest level of trust and
full disclosure of the client’s most confidential information to his/her lawyer for
Benedict.
The Rule of St Benedict was developed by St. Benedict in the sixth
Christ, and is still widely observed today. Among the 73 Chapters in The Rule
of St Benedict, there are two rules that I think will best apply in this case. First
Benedict means that if God is judge, then your brother doesn’t need you to be
his lawyer. I believe that with such a rule St. Benedict would have chosen to do
the opposite of what the two legal counsels did and instead of defending Robert
Garrow, He would not allowed further suffering to the family of the victims and
aided the discovery of the truth despite the legal challenges he might face. This
is further reinforced by the rule in chapter 72 The Good Zeal of Monks, similar
the main difference is that for St. Benedict monks should be moderate in
consideration for St. Benedict. Thus, I believe he would not have continued the
zealous representation of Robert Garrow, because for him the truth would have