Saudi Arabian Airlines Vs CA

About Case Digest List Bar Exam Subjects Reviewer Jurisprudence
Legal Updates Legal Jokes English 101
Home RSS Twitter Facebook My Food Blog My Travel Blog
My Lifestyle Blog
Like 1 Tweet
Type Search Here Search
Share 1
Conflicts Of Laws
Case Digest: Saudi
Arabian Airlines V.
CA
Follow On Instagram
G.R. No. 122191 October 8, 1998
Laws Applicable: Art 19 and 21 of Civil

Code
Lessons Applicable: Conflict of Laws,
factual situation, connecting factor,
characterization, choice of law, State of
the most significant relationship
FACTS:
Saudi Arabian Airlines (SAUDIA),
foreign airlines corporation doing
business in the Philippines and
may be served summons in agent
in Makati, hired Milagros P.
Morada as a flight attendant for
its airlines based in Jeddah, Saudi
Arabia.
April 27, 1990: While on a lay-over
in Jakarta, Indonesia, Morada
went to a disco dance with fellow
crew members Thamer Al-
Gazzawi and Allah Al-Gazzawi,
both Saudi nationals. It was
almost morning when they
returned to their hotels so they
agreed to have breakfast together
at the room of Thamer. Shortly
after Allah left the room, Thamer
attempted to rape Morada.
Fortunately, a roomboy and
several security personnel heard
her cries for help and rescued
her. Indonesian police arrested
Thamer and Allah Al-Gazzawi, the
latter as an accomplice.
When Morada returned to Jeddah,
SAUDIA officials interrogated her
about the Jakarta incident and
requested her to go back to
Jakarta to help arrange the
release of Thamer and Allah. In
Jakarta, SAUDIA Legal Officers
negotiated with the police for the
immediate release of the detained
crew members but did not
succeed. Afraid that she might
be tricked into something she did
not want because of her inability
to understand the local dialect,
Morado refused to cooperate and
declined to sign a blank paper
and a document written in the
local dialect. Eventually, SAUDIA
allowed Morada to return to
Jeddah but barred her from the
Jakarta flights.
Indonesian authorities agreed to
deport Thamer and Allah and they
were again put in service. While,
Morada was transferred to
Manila.
January 14, 1992: Morada was
asked to see Mr. Ali Meniewy, Blog Archive
Chief Legal Officer of SAUDIA, in ► 2018 (1)
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. He ► 2017 (34)
brought her to the police station ► 2016 (13)
where the police took her
► 2015 (25)
passport and questioned her
► 2014 (15)
about the Jakarta incident. The
▼ 2013 (226)
police pressured her to drop the
► November (62)
case against Thamer and Allah.
► August (9)
Not until she agreed to do so did
▼ July (2)
the police return her passport and
Conflicts of Laws Case Digest: Saudi
allowed her to catch the
Arabian Airli...
afternoon flight out of Jeddah.
Jurisdiction: G.R. No. 122191 October
June 16, 1993: Morada, while in
8, 1998
Riyadh Saudi Arabia, was not
► June (20)
allowed to board the plane to
► May (120)
Manila and instead ordered to
take a later flight to Jeddah to see ► March (9)
Mr. Miniewy. Khalid of the ► February (4)
SAUDIA office brought her to a ► 2012 (76)

Saudi court where she was asked ► 2011 (526)
to sign a document written in
Arabic. They told her that this was
necessary to close the case
against Thamer and Allah but it My Blog List
Travel Tripsters
was actually a notice for her to
Cintai Corito's Garden: 12 Things
appear before the court on June to Make Your Visit Wholesome - I
27, 1993. Plaintiff then returned used to go to a place just for the
sake of having gone there but now
to Manila. I prefer to have a checklist to
make every experience
June 27, 1993: SAUDIA's Manila wholesome. Before our family ...
manager, Aslam Saleemi, assured 1 day ago
Morada that the investigation was Crumpylicious Blog
routinary and that it posed no VR+ Next Generation Virtual
Reality: How We Beat the VR
danger to her so she reported to Game - Whether its physical or
Miniewy in Jeddah for further virtual, my cousins have been our
constant playmates for more than
investigation. She was brought to
2 decades! After our dinner at S'
the Saudi court. Maison, they invited us to tr...
June 28, 1993: Saudi judge 1 day ago
interrogated Morada through an Tsinoy Foodies
Denny's: Post-Work Out Dinner
interpreter about the Jakarta
(Trinoma Quezon City) - A few
incident for an hour and let her months ago, I was contemplating
go. SAUDIA officers forbidden to be a member of a gym to
motivate myself to work out. My
her to take flight. She was told to friend V volunteered to orient me
go the Inflight Service Office with the two types of *...
where her passport was taken 2 days ago
and they told her to remain in Philippine Deals

Best Ways To Track Your
Jeddah, at the crew quarters, until Ovulation - Arе you рlаnnіng to gеt
further orders. рrеgnаnt? If you dо, уоu hаvе to
lеаrn how tо track your оvulаtіоn.
July 3, 1993: She was brought to
Undеrѕtаndіng the рrосеѕѕ of
court again and to her оvulаtіоn will help уоu to dеtеrmі...
astonishment and shock, 8 months ago
rendered a decision, translated to
her in English, sentencing her to
five months imprisonment and to
286 lashes. The court tried her,
together with Thamer and Allah,
and found her guilty of (1)
adultery (2) going to a disco,
dancing and listening to the
music in violation of Islamic laws
and (3) socializing with the male
Total Page Views
crew, in contravention of Islamic
tradition. 1524053
Failing to seek the assistance of
her employer, SAUDIA, she asked
the Philippine Embassy in Jeddah
to help her while her case is on
appeal. She continued to workon
the domestic flight of SAUDIA,
while Thamer and Allah continued
to serve in the international
flights.
Because she was wrongfully
convicted, the Prince of Makkah
dismissed the case against her
and allowed her to leave Saudi
Arabia. Before her return to
Manila, she was terminated from
the service by SAUDIA, without
her being informed of the cause.
November 23, 1993: Morada filed
a Complaint for damages against
SAUDIA, and Khaled Al-Balawi, its
country manager.
January 19, 1994: SAUDIA filed
an Omnibus Motion To Dismiss
on following grounds: (1) that the
Complaint states no cause of
action against SAUDIA (2) that
defendant Al-Balawi is not a real
party in interest (3) that the claim
or demand set forth in the
Complaint has been waived,
abandoned or otherwise
extinguished and (4) that the trial
court has no jurisdiction to try the
case.
After opposition to the motion to
dismiss by Morada and reply by
SAUDIA, Morada filed an
Amended Complaint dropping Al-
Balawi. SAUDIA filed its
Manifestation, Motion to Dismiss
Amended Complaint,
subsequently motion for
reconsideration which were all
denied.
SAUDIA filed its Petition for
Certiorari and Prohibition with
Prayer for Issuance of Writ of
Preliminary Injunction and/or
Temporary Restraining Order with
the Court of Appeals. TRO was
granted but Writ of Preliminary
Injunction was denied.
CA: Philippines is an appropriate
forum considering that the
Amended Complaint's basis for
recovery of damages is Article 21
of the Civil Code, and thus, clearly
within the jurisdiction of
respondent Court. It further held
that certiorari is not the proper
remedy in a denial of a Motion to
Dismiss, inasmuch as the
petitioner should have proceeded
to trial, and in case of an adverse
ruling, find recourse in an appeal.
SAUDIA filed its Supplemental
Petition for Review with Prayer for
Temporary Restraining Order:
o It is a conflict of laws that

must be settled at the outset:
§ Morada's claim for alleged
abuse of rights occurred
in the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia.
§ Existence of a foreign
element qualifies the
instant case for the
application of the law of
the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia, by virtue of the lex
loci delicti commissi rule.
Morada: Amended Complaint is
based on Articles 19 and 21 of
the Civil Code which is a matter of
domestic law
ISSUE: W/N the RTC of Quezon City has

jurisdiction over the case and it is the
proper forum for recovery of damages
under Art. 21 of the Civil Code which
should govern.
HELD: YES. petition for certiorari is

hereby DISMISSED. REMANDED to RTC
of Quezon City, Branch 89 for further
proceedings
Where the factual antecedents
satisfactorily establish the
existence of a foreign element,
the problem could present a
"conflicts" case
A factual situation that cuts
across territorial lines and is
affected by the diverse laws of
two or more states is said to
contain a "foreign element".
o Morada is a resident Philippine

national
o SAUDIA is a resident foreign
corporation
o by virtue of the employment of
Morada with the SAUDIA as a
flight stewardess, events did
transpire during her many
occasions of travel across
national borders, particularly
from Manila, Philippines to
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and
vice versa, that caused a
"conflicts" situation to arise
Forms of foreign element:
o Simple: one of the parties to a

contract is an alien or has a
foreign domicile, or that a
contract between nationals of
one State involves properties
situated in another State
o Complex
Violations of Articles 19 and 21
are actionable, with judicially
enforceable remedies in the
municipal forum. RTC of Quezon
City possesses jurisdiction over
the subject matter of the suit.
Pragmatic considerations,
including the convenience of the
parties, also weigh heavily in
favor of the RTC Quezon City
assuming jurisdiction:
o private interest of the litigant

o enforceability of a judgment if
one is obtained
o relative advantages and
obstacles to a fair trial
§ Plaintiff may not, by choice
of an inconvenient forum,
"vex", "harass", or
"oppress" the defendant,
e.g. by inflicting upon him
needless expense or
disturbance. but unless
the balance is strongly in
favor of the defendant, the
plaintiffs choice of forum
should rarely be
disturbed.
Weighing the relative claims of
the parties, the court a quo found
it best to hear the case in the
Philippines. Had it refused to take
cognizance of the case, it would
be forcing plaintiff (private
respondent now) to seek remedial
action elsewhere, i.e. in the
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia where
she no longer maintains
substantial connections. That
would have caused a
fundamental unfairness to her.
Moreover, by hearing the case in
the Philippines no unnecessary
difficulties and inconvenience
have been shown by either of the
parties.
Trial court possesses jurisdiction
over the persons of the parties
o By filing her Complaint and

Amended Complaint with the
trial court, private respondent
has voluntary submitted
herself to the jurisdiction of
the court
o SAUDIA has effectively
submitted to the trial court's
jurisdiction by praying for the
dismissal of the Amended
Complaint on grounds other
than lack of jurisdiction.
As to the choice of applicable law,
it seeks to answer 2 important
questions:
o (1) What legal system should

control a given situation
where some of the significant
facts occurred in two or more
states
o (2) to what extent should the
chosen legal system regulate
the situation
Although ideally, all choice-of-law
theories should intrinsically
advance both notions of justice
and predictability, they do not
always do so. The forum is then
faced with the problem of
deciding which of these two
important values should be
stressed.
Before a choice can be made, it is
necessary for us to determine
under what category a certain set
of facts or rules fall
o "characterization" or the
"doctrine of qualification”
§ process of deciding
whether or not the facts
relate to the kind of
question specified in a
conflicts rule
§ purpose: to enable the
forum to select the proper
law
Choice-of-law rules invariably
consist of: (essential element of
conflict rules)
o factual situation/relationship
or operative fact (such as
property right, contract claim);
and
§ starting point of analysis
o test or connecting factor or
point of contact (such as the
situs of the res, the place of
celebration, the place of
performance, or the place of
wrongdoing) – could be:
§ (1) The nationality of a
person, his domicile, his
residence, his place of
sojourn, or his origin
§ (2) the seat of a legal or
juridical person, such as a
corporation
§ (3) the situs of a thing, that
is, the place where a thing
is, or is deemed to be
situated. In particular, the
lex situs is decisive when
real rights are involved
§ (4) the place where an act
has been done, the locus
actus, such as the place
where a contract has
been made, a marriage
celebrated, a will signed
or a tort committed. The
lex loci actus is
particularly important in
contracts and torts
§ (5) the place where an act is
intended to come into
effect, e.g., the place of
performance of
contractual duties, or the
place where a power of
attorney is to be exercised
§ (6) the intention of the
contracting parties as to
the law that should
govern their agreement,
the lex loci intentionis;
§ (7) the place where judicial
or administrative
proceedings are instituted
or done. The lex fori — the
law of the forum — is
particularly important
because, as we have seen
earlier, matters of
"procedure" not going to
the substance of the
claim involved are
governed by it; and
because the lex fori
applies whenever the
content of the otherwise
applicable foreign law is
excluded from application
in a given case for the
reason that it falls under
one of the exceptions to
the applications of foreign
law; and
§ (8) the flag of a ship, which
in many cases is decisive
of practically all legal
relationships of the ship
and of its master or owner
as such. It also covers
contractual relationships
particularly contracts of
affreightment
Note that one or more
circumstances may be present to
serve as the possible test for the
determination of the applicable
law.
Based on pleadings on record,
including allegations in the
Amended Complaint:
o Morada was made to face trial

for very serious charges,
including adultery and
violation of Islamic laws and
tradition
o SAUDIA may have acted
beyond its duties as employer
by handing over the person of
Morada to Jeddah officials
which contributed to and
amplified or even proximately
caused additional humiliation,
misery and suffering. It also
took advantage of the trust,
confidence and faith in the
guise of authority as
employer.
o Conviction and imprisonment
was wrongful but injury or
harm was inflicted upon her
person and reputation which
must be compensated or
redress for the wrong doing
Complaint involving torts
"connecting factor" or "point of
contact" - place or places where
the tortious conduct or lex loci
actus occurred = Philippines
where SAUDIA deceived Morada,
a Filipina residing and working
here.
"State of the most significant
relationship" – applied
o taken into account and

evaluated according to their
relative importance with
respect to the particular
issue:
§ (a) the place where the
injury occurred
§ (b) the place where the
conduct causing the
injury occurred
§ (c) the domicile, residence,
nationality, place of
incorporation and place of
business of the parties
§ (d) the place where the
relationship, if any,
between the parties is
centered
v private respondent is a
resident Filipina
national, working here
v a resident foreign
corporation engaged
here in the business
of international air
carriage
Labels: 1998, Case Digest,

characterization, conflict of laws,
conflicts of laws, connecting factor,
factual situation, G.R. No. 122191, Juris
Doctor, October 8, saudi arabian
airlines v ca
Newer Post Home Older Post
Labels
04/19 (1) 1.2 (1) 11/20 (1) 121479 (1) 128604 (1) 1906 (1)
1909 (2) 1910 (13) 1911 (2) 1912 (1) 1914 (10) 1915 (6)
1917 (1) 1918 (9) 1920 (4) 1921 (1) 1922 (8) 1923 (2)
1925 (4) 1926 (4) 1927 (3) 1929 (1) 1930 (4) 1931 (4)
1932 (2) 1933 (4) 1935 (4) 1935 constitution (1) 1936 (2)
1937 (4) 1938 (1) 1940 (2) 1942 (5) 1943 (2) 1946 (2) 1948
(2) 1949 (4) 1950 (2) 1951 (9) 1952 (3) 1953 (3) 1954
(8) 1955 (6) 1956 (2) 1957 (4) 1958 (3) 1960 (2) 1961
(6) 1961 Juris Doctor (2) 1962 (6) 1963 (7) 1964 (6)
1965 (4) 1966 (12) 1967 (13) 1968 (10) 1969 (2)
1970 (2) 1971 (2) 1972 (2) 1973 (5) 1974 (2) 1975 (10)
1976 (2) 1977 (6) 1978 (8) 1979 (6) 1980 (4) 1981 (8)
1982 (10) 1983 (8) 1984 (7) 1985 (3) 1986 (8) 1987
(7) 1987 Constitution (4) 1988 (10) 1989 (18) 1990
(15) 1991 (12) 1992 (26) 1992.Nature of Certificate of
Stock (2) 1993 (23) 1994 (20) 1995 (15) 1996 (11)
1997 (26) 1997 rules of civil procedure (1) 1998 (23)
1999 (42) 2/10 (1) 2000 (25) 2001 (22) 2002 (22)
2003 (28) 2004 (7) 2005 (16) 2006 (45) 2007 (27)
2008 (35) 2009 (13) 2010 (16) 2011 (10) 2012 (4)
2012 bar exam results (1) 2013 (1) 2014 (3) 2014 bar exam
passers (1) 2014 bar exam results (1) 2015 (2) 2016 bar
passers (1) 2016 bar results (1) 2016 bar top notchers (1)
2016 successful bar candidates (1) 212 U.S. 449 (2) 246
Corporation v. Daway (2) 283 U.S. 102 (2) 295 U.S. 247 (2)
309 U.S. 78 (2) 4-year grace period (2) 997 (1) A.M. No. 190
(2) A.M. No. MTJ-92-716 (2) A.M. No. RTJ-02-1673 (2) A.M.
No. RTJ-07-2062 (1) A.M. RTJ-07-2062 (1) abandoned (1)
Aboitiz Shipping Corp v Insurance Co of North America (1)
ABSCBN v. CA (1) acceptance (2) acceptance by obligee (1)

Accommodation (2) Accommodation Party (17)
accomodation party (5) Accrual method (3)
Acknowledgement receipt (1) acop v piraso (1) Actionable
Document (10) Actual or Compensatory Damage (1)

administrative expenses (2) Aggravating circumstance (2)
Agner v. BPI (1) Agro Conglomerates Inc. v. CA (2) Aisporna v
CA (1) ajero v ca (1) Algarra v Sandejas (1) all events test (2)
Allied Banking Corp. v. CA (2) Allied Banking Corp. v. Lim Sio
Wan (2) allowable administrative expenses (2) Alteration
(8) alvarado v galviola (1) Ambiguous Provisions Interpreted

Against Insurer (2) American Home Assurance Co v Chua (1)
Ancillary Contracts (3) Ang v. Associated Bank (2)

applicability of provisions (6) application and problems
(1) Apply accrual method equally for both deduction and
income (1) Apr. 19 2007 (1) April 11 (1) April 12 (4) April 13
(2) April 16 (2) April 18 (4) April 19 (3) April 20 (4) April
22 (2) April 23 (1) April 25 (4) April 26 (2) April 27 (2) April
28 (1) April 29 (3) April 3 (4) April 30 (2) April 8 (2) April 9
(4) Areola v CA (1) art 1106 (1) art 1106 civil code (1) art
1107 (1) art 1173 (1) art 1174 servando v philippine steam
navigation (1) art 1245 (1) art 1255 (1) art 1263 (1) art 14 rpc
(2) art 1504 (1) art 1523 (1) art 1736 (1) art 19 (2) art 1902 (1)
art 2 rpc (3) Art 20 (1) art 2087 (1) art 21 (4) Art 2176
(3) art 2180 (1) art 2208 (1) art 2217 (1) art 2219 (3) art
2229 (1) art 225 (1) art 23 (2) art 26 (2) Art 3 RPC (2) art 32 (1)
art 4 rpc (6) art 6 rpc (2) art 64 (1) art 65 (1) art. 1 (2) ART.
1089 (2) art. 15 (2) Art. 17 (1) Art. 1733 (2) Art. 1734 (2) Art.
1736 (2) Art. 175 (1) Art. 1755 (4) Art. 1756 (2) Art. 1759 (2)
Art. 1763 (2) Art. 1910 (1) art. 2 (1) art. 2 civil code (1) art. 2
rpc (2) Art. 2011 Civil Code (1) ART. 2208 (1) Art. 26 (1) art. 3
(1) art. 41 (1) art. 6 rpc (6) Art. XII (4) art.3 rpc (1) Article 1
RPC (2) Article 1173 (1) Article 1191 (1) Article 1249 of the
New Civil Code (1) Article 1764 (1) Article 2206 (1) Article
2208 (1) Article 2219 (1) Article 2220 (1) Article 2232 of the
Civil Code (1) Article VII (1) Article X (1) Assignee (1) Assoc.
Bank and Conrado Cruz v. CA (2) Associated Bank v. CA (1)

Associated Bank v. CA (1) Associated Bank v. Pronstroller (2)
assumed within the purview of general rule (1) Astro
Electronics Corp. v. Phil. Export (2) ateneo (2) ateneo law
(6) ateneo law school (1) Atrium Management Corp. v. CA (2)

Attempted (2) attempted murder (2) Attempted or Frustrated
Stage (2) attempted rape (3) Attempter (2) attoryneys fees
(1) Atty. Ferrer v Sps. Diaz (1) Aug. 15 (1) August 06 (2)
August 1 (2) August 10 (2) August 11 (4) August 12 (3)
August 15 (3) August 17 (4) August 18 (2) August 20

(3) August 21 (2) August 22 (2) August 23 (5) August 25
(1) August 28 (4) August 29 (4) August 3 (4) August
30 (1) August 31 (9) August 5 (1) August 6 (6) August 9
(2) Authoried Driver Clause (1) Authority to Receive Payment
(1) Authority to Receive Payment/Effect of Payment (1)

authorized driver (1) avera v garcia (1) azaola v singson (1)
aznar v garcia (1) azuela v ca (1) Bachrach Motor Co v.
Lacson Ledesma (2) Bachrach v British American Assurance
Co (1) bagtas v paguio (1) bail (5) Balanay Jr. v. Martinez (2)
baleros v. people (2) Baliwag Transit Corp. v. CA (1) baliwag

v. ca (1) baltazar v laxa (1) Bank of America v CA (1) bank
products (1) bar exam (5) bar exam passers (1) bar exam
result (2) bar exam results (1) bar exam review (1) bar exam
tips (1) bar exams (1) Bataan Cigar v. CA (2) Bautista v. Auto
Plus Traders (2) Bayla v. Silang Traffic Co. (2) bellis v bellis
(1) Bellis vs Bellis (1) benguet electric cooperative v ca (1)
Bernabe Castillo et al v Hon Court of Appeals (1) bicolandia
drug corp v. cir (2) bigamy (3) Bill of Lading (2) bill of
rights (4) binding effect of payment (2) bir (4) bir function
(2) bir power (2) birth certificate (1) Blood Relationship
(3) Bonifacio Bros v Mora (1) bonnevie v. ca (1) book (1)

book excerpts (1) book launch (1) book review (1) bosal
holding bv v stratessecretaris van financier (1) bp 22 (2) bpi

investment corp v ca (2) BPI v. CA (3) BPI v. Fidelity (2)
British Airways v. CA (2) british american tobacco v. camacho
(2) Bull v. United States (2) burden of proof in accrual method
(2) business (1) Business Economics (3) Business

Economics notes (4) buy bust operation (1) Calculation of
Risk (1) Calimutan v. People (1) Caltex v. CA (1) Caltex (Phils.)
Inc. v. CA and Security Bank and Trust Co (1) Caltex v
Sulpicio Lines (1) Calvo v UCPB Gen Insurance Co (1) Caneda
Jr. v. CA (2) caneda v ca (1) Cangco v MRR (1) canlas v ca (1)

capital asset (2) Capital Insurance Surety Co Inc v Plastic Era
(1) capital loss (2) Carlos Arcona y Moban v CA (1) carriage
(1) CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT (2) Carrier or
Depositary (1) Carry-over (2) case (6) Case C-168/ (1)
Case Digest (377) case digests (9) case

digst (1) Case Method Notes (1) case overview (1) cases
(34) Cases where Moral Damage is allowed (1) Cases where
Moral damages are allowed (1) Cebu International Finance
Corp. v. CA (2) cenomar (1) centennial prayer (1) Centralized
Management Doctrine (2) Cerrano v Tan (1) certainty (2)
Certificate of stock (2) Cha v CA (1) characteristics of
human rights (4) characterization (2) charter party (4)

Checks (14) chico-nazario (1) china banking corp v. ca (2)
Ching v. Sec. of Justice (3) CIA Maritima v. Insurance Co
(2) cir v Lincoln Philippine Life Insurance (1) cir v. acosta (2)
CIR v. Aichi Forging Company (2010) (2) cir v. estate of

benigno toda jr (2) CIR v. Isabela Cultural Corp. (2) CIR v.
Mirant (2011) (2) citizen suit (2) Civil Code (1) civil law
review (5) civil procedure (3) civil procedure codals (1)

Civil Procedure Notes Outline (1) claim for refund (3) Clear
Provision Given Ordinary Meaning (1) Co v. Admiral United

Savings Bank (2) Codals (2) Code of Professional
Responsibility (1) codoy v calugay (1) cogsa (1) Cometa v CA
(1) commerce (1) commercial law (2) commercial law review
(1) commercial law reviewer (1) commodatum (1) common
grammatical error (2) complete list (1) Complex Electric v

NLRC (1) concept of moral damages (1) conflict of law
case digest (3) conflict of laws (12) conflicts of law

Notes Outline (1) conflicts of laws (2) conflicts of laws review
(2) congress (1) connecting factor (2) consideration (25)

Consolidated Bank v. CA (1) Consolidated Plywood v. IFC (2)
conspiracy (4) Constantino v Asia Life Insurance Co (1)
Constitution (2) constitutional law (7) consummated
crime (2) contract of adhesion (2) Contracting Parties (3)
Coquia v Fieldmens Insurance Co Inc (1) cornelio amaro v
Ambrocio Sumanguit (1) coronel v ca (1) corporate

criminal liability (4) Corporate Law (81)
Corporate Law Case Digest (42) Corporate Law
Notes (6) Corporate Law Notes Outline (1) corporate
negligence (1) Corporate Officers or employees (3)
Corporation by estoppel doctrine (2) court (1) court of tax
appeal (1) courts (1) cover notes (1) coverage (1) credit in life
and health insurance (1) credit transactions (12)

crim law 1 (65) crim pro (1) criminal acts not immune
(2) criminal law (10) criminal liability (1) criminal
procedure (17) criminal procedure case digest (3)
Crismina Garments v CA (1) cruz v villasor (1) cta findings (2)
cta jurisdiction (1) cuevas v achacoso (1) Damages (4)
Dangwa Transportation Co. Inc. v. CA (2) Datu Tagoranao
Benito v. SEC (2) davao gulf lumber corporation v. cir (2) DBP
v CA (1) de castro (1) de la cruz v capital ins (1) De la Pena v
CA (1) De los Santos v. Republic (2) Dealings Between
Corporation and Stockholders (2) Dealings with Corp. and
Stockholders (2) death certificate (1) December 10 (2)

December 12 (1) December 14 (4) December 16 (5)

December 3 (2) December 7 (1) December 8 (5) December

9 (2) deductibility of bad debts (2) Dee v. SEC (2) Defective
attempt to form (2) defense of stranger (1) defenses (2)
Definition and Concept of Damages (2) Definition and
Coverage of Casualty Insurance (2) Definition and Coverage

of Life Insurance (1) Definition of a Close Corporation (2)
definition of felony (2) Degrees of Negligence (2) Del Rosario
v CA (1) Del Rosario v Equitable Ins. and Casualty Co (1) Del
Val v Del Val (1) delfin lim v Francisco Ponce De Leon (1)
Delgado Brothers (2) demand (1) Demand and Supply

Analysis (2) deposits (1) Dereliction of Duty (1) Determinants
(1) digest (2) direct injury test (4) Director of Lands v. CA
(2) Director of Lands v. IAC (2) Discharge of instrument (2)
disorder in the court (1) Disqualification (1) divorce (2) Doctor
(1) Doctrine of exhaustion (1) Doctrine of Piercing (1)

Doctrine of Processual Presumption (1) documents
processing (1) Doing an Insurance Business (1) donation

(4) dorotheo v ca (1) Double insurance (1) double taxation (1)
due process (5) Dy v. People (2) Edward J. Nell Co. v.
Pacific Farms Inc (2) Effect of Change of Interest (1) Effect of
Change of Interest in Thing Insured (2) Effect of Lack of
Insurable Interest (3) effect of non payment (2) Effect of

Payment (1) effect of transfer (1) El Oriente Fabrica de
Tabacos Inc v Posadas (1) Election of Directors; Vacancy in
the Board (2) Elements (2) elements of quasi delict (3)
emergency rule (1) en banc (74) Enervida v dela Torre
(1) Engada v CA (1) english 101 (2) enriquez v abadia (1)
Enriquez v Sun Life Assurance (1) environmental law (2)

equilibrium (1) Equitable PCI Bank v. Ong (2) erap v
sandiganbayan (2) Ernesto Medina v Hon Floreliana Castro-
Bartolome (1) estafa (2) estate (1) estate tax (2) estoppel
(5) Estoppel and credit extension (2) estoppel applies in CTA

tax disputes (1) Eternal Gardens Memorial Park Corp v
Philippine American Life Insurance (1) events (1) Everett
Streamship Corp. v. CA (2) Evident Premeditation (2) EX
criminally liable civilly liable (2) Exception to Ambiguous
Provisions Interpreted Against Insurer (1) exception to

perfection (1) Exceptions to Contracting Parties (4)
executive department (2) exhaust administrative claim (1)
Exhaust Administrative Claim Before Judicial Claim (1)
existing interest (5) expenses (2) expert and professionals

(1) Expert Travel v CA (1) experts and professionals (1)
Exploitation of Natural Resources (2) extradition (9)
extradition process (2) extradition treaty (2) f. Government of
the USA v. Hon. Purganan (1) Factors in determining
amount (7) FACTS (1) factual situation (2) family code

(3) Far East Bank Trust v. Gold Palace Jewelry (2) far eastern
university (1) Fausto Barredo v. Severino Garcia (2) fc (1)
Feati University v. Bautista (1) Feb. 27 2006 (1) February 12
(2) february 15 (4) February 16 (4) February 18 (4)
February 19 (2) February 2 (3) February 21 (2) February

22 (5) February 23 (4) February 24 (2) February 25 (3)
February 26 (4) February 27 (7) February 28 (8)
February 29 (4) February 4 (2) February 5 (2) February 6
(7) February 7 (2) February 8 (4) February 9 (11)
Federico Ylarde v Edgardo Aquino (1) felonies (1) felony (1)
fernando v ca (1) feu (1) FGU Insurance Corporation v CA (1)
Fictitious Persons (2) Filipinas Compania de Seguros v
Christern Henefeld (1) Filipinas Port v. Go (2) Filipinas
Synthentic Fiber v. CA (1999) (2) Filipino Merchants

Insurance Co v CA (1) first division (54) first part (1)
fitness by design v. cir (2) Fleischer v. Botica Nolasco Co (2)
foreign policy prerogative (2) foreigner (2) forgery (21)

Fortune Insurance and Surety Co v CA (1) forum non
conveniens (1) fqs (1) francisco pangilinan (1) Francisco v
GSIS (1) Francisco v. CA (2) fraud (1) Frustrated (2) frustrated
or consummated theft (2) Fuentes v CA (1) Fule v CA (1) Fully
Paid Shares (1) G. R. No. 160188 (1) G. R. No. 116320 (1) G.

R. No. 160188 (1) G. R. No. 164317 (1) G. R. No. 164317
February 6 (2) G.R. 79050-51 (1) G.R. No 48196 (2) G.R. No.
146635 (2) G.R. No. 166862 (1) G.R. No. 168100 November
20 (1) G.R. No. 101083 (2) G.R. No. 101163 (2) G.R. No.
101503 (2) G.R. No. 102253 (2) G.r. No. 102342 (2) G.R. No.
102383 (2) G.R. No. 103119 (2) G.R. No. 103379 (2) G.R. No.
103554 (1) G.R. No. 103577 (1) G.R. No. 104376 (1) G.R. No.
104376 February 23 (1) G.R. No. 105562 (2) G.R. No. 105774
(2) G.R. No. 105836 (2) G.R. No. 106720 (1) G.R. No. 107062
(2) G.R. No. 107382 (1) G.R. No. 107382/G.R. No. 107612 (1)
G.R. No. 107508 (2) G.R. No. 107518 (2) G.R. No. 107612 (1)
G.R. No. 108017 (2) G.R. No. 108581 (1) G.R. No. 109491 (1)
G.R. No. 111584 (2) G.R. No. 111692 (2) G.R. No. 112024 (2)
G.R. No. 112160 (3) G.R. No. 112212 (2) G.R. No. 112287
(1) G.R. No. 112287 December 12 (1) G.R. No. 112392 (2) G.R.
No. 112573 (2) G.R. No. 113213 (1) G.R. No. 113578 (2) G.R.
No. 113725 (1) G.R. No. 113899 (1) G.R. No. 114061 (3)
G.R. No. 114118 (2) G.R. No. 115024 (1) G.R. No. 115117 (2)
G.R. No. 115156 (2) G.R. No. 115278 (2) G.R. No. 116320 (1)
G.R. No. 116736 (2) G.R. No. 117359 (2) G.R. No. 117660 (2)
G.R. No. 118325 (2) G.R. No. 118342 (1) G.R. No. 118357 (2)
G.R. No. 118794 (2) G.R. No. 119176 (2) G.R. No. 120135 (2)
G.R. No. 120262 (2) G.R. No. 120554 (2) G.R. No. 120706 (2)
G.R. No. 120988 (2) G.R. No. 121315 (2) G.R. No. 121413 (2)
G.R. No. 121479 (1) G.R. No. 121828 (2) G.R. No. 121998 (2)
G.R. No. 122099 (2) G.R. No. 122191 (2) G.R. No. 122494 (2)
G.R. No. 122880 (1) G.R. No. 123031 (2) G.R. No. 123404 (2)
G.R. No. 123486 (1) G.R. No. 124050 (2) G.R. No. 124062 (2)
G.R. No. 124099 (1) G.R. No. 124354 (2) G.R. No. 124371 (2)
G.R. No. 124520 (2) G.R. No. 125508 (2) G.R. No. 125678 (2)
G.R. No. 125835 (1) G.R. No. 125851 (2) G.R. No. 125865 (2)
G.R. No. 126204 (2) G.R. No. 126297 (3) G.R. No. 126405
(1) G.R. No. 126518 (2) G.R. No. 126670 December 2 (2) G.R.
No. 127326 (2) G.R. No. 127823 (2) G.R. No. 128286 (2) G.R.
No. 128604 (1) G.R. No. 128690 (2) G.R. No. 128721 (2) G.R.
No. 129433 (2) G.R. No. 129459 (2) G.R. No. 129584 (2) G.R.
No. 129792 (2) G.R. No. 129910 (2) G.R. No. 130030 (2) G.R.
No. 130421 (2) G.R. No. 131166 (1) G.R. No. 131621 (1) G.R.
No. 132403 (2) G.R. No. 132419 (2) G.R. No. 133179 (2) G.R.
No. 133632 (2) G.R. No. 134784 (2) G.R. No. 136448 (1) G.R.
No. 136448 November 3 (1) G.R. No. 136729 (2) G.R. No.
137775 (1) G.R. No. 138033 (2) G.R. No. 138074 (2) G.R. No.
138322 (1) G.R. No. 138510 (2) G.R. No. 138569 (2) G.R. No.
138739 (2) G.R. No. 139325 (2) G.R. No. 139465 (1) G.R. NO.
139802 (2) G.R. No. 140006-10 (2) G.R. No. 140047 (2) G.R.
No. 140698 (3) G.R. No. 140707 (2) G.R. No. 142616 (2)
G.R. No. 143838 (2) G.R. No. 144476 (2) G.R. No. 145804
(3) G.R. No. 146511 (2) G.R. NO. 146779 (2) G.R. No. 147188
(2) G.R. No. 147746 (2) G.R. No. 147839 (2) G.R. No. 148083
(2) G.R. No. 148132 (1) G.R. No. 148211 (2) G.R. No. 148444
(1) G.R. No. 148496 (1) G.R. No. 148560 (2) G.R. No. 148571
(1) G.R. No. 149038 (2) G.R. No. 151079 (1) G.R. No. 151445
April 11 (1) G.R. No. 151445 April 11 (1) G.R. No. 151969 (2)
G.R. No. 152133 (2) G.R. No. 153675 (1) G.R. No. 153898
October 18 (2) G.R. No. 154068 (2) G.R. No. 154127 (2) G.R.
No. 154469 (2) G.R. No. 154514 (1) G.R. No. 154740 (2) G.R.
No. 15566 (1) G.R. No. 155791 (2) G.R. No. 156167 (2) G.R.
No. 156207 (2) G.R. No. 156294 (2) G.R. No. 157216 (2) G.R.
No. 157309 (2) G.R. No. 157451 (1) G.R. No. 157547 (2) G.R.
No. 157833 (1) G.R. No. 157906 (3) G.R. No. 157977 (1)
G.R. No. 158262 (2) G.R. No. 158312 (2) G.R. No. 159747 (1)
G.R. No. 161886 (1) G.R. No. 162230 (2) G.R. No. 163583 (1)
G.R. No. 163583 August 20 (1) G.R. No. 1641 (1) G.R. No.
165109 (2) G.R. No. 165300 (1) G.R. No. 165483 (2) G.R. No.
165546 (2) G.R. No. 165842 (2) G.R. No. 165993 (2) G.R. No.
166006 March 14 (2) G.R. No. 166006 March 14 (1) G.R. No.
166245 (2) G.R. No. 166326 (2) G.R. No. 166405 (2) G.R. No.
166479 (2) G.R. No. 167330 (2) g.r. no. 167571 (1) G.R. No.
168100 November 20 (1) G.R. No. 168115 (2) G.R. No.
168118 (2) G.R. No. 168274 (2) G.R. No. 168402 (2) G.R. No.
170257 (2) G.R. No. 170325 (2) G.R. No. 170984 (2) G.R. No.
171052 (2) G.R. No. 172231 (2) G.R. No. 172896 (2) G.R. No.
172966 (2) G.R. No. 173594 (1) G.R. No. 173915 (1) G.R. No.
174489 (1) G.R. No. 176165 (2) G.R. No. 176831 (1) G.R. No.
177982 (2) G.R. No. 178090 (2) G.R. No. 178523 (2) G.R. No.
17958 (2) G.R. No. 179859 (1) G.R. No. 180356 (2) G.R. No.
181132 (2) G.R. No. 182963 (1) G.R. No. 183526 (1) G.R. No.
183905 (2) G.R. No. 184823 (2) G.R. No. 194515 (2) G.R. No.
20341 (2) G.R. No. 23703 (2) G.R. No. 34774 (2) G.R. No.
44119 (2) G.R. No. 48541 (2) G.R. No. 6659 (2) G.R. No.
71871 (1) G.R. No. 72110 (2) G.R. No. 72593 (2) G.R. No.
73886 (2) G.R. No. 74695 (1) G.R. No. 74761 (2) G.R. No.
74886 (2) G.R. No. 75605 (2) G.R. No. 76452 (2) G.R. No.
76788 (2) G.R. No. 80294-95 (1) G.R. No. 80447 (2) G.R. No.
81322 (2) G.R. No. 83122 (2) G.R. No. 84197 (1) G.R. No.
84197 July 28 (2) G.R. No. 85141 (3) G.R. No. 88724 (2)
G.R. No. 88866 (2) G.R. No. 89802 (2) G.R. No. 89880 (2) G.R.
No. 92087 (1) G.R. No. 92244 (2) G.R. No. 92288 (3) G.R.
No. 93048 (2) G.R. No. 93073 (2) G.R. No. 93397 (2) G.R. No.
93695 (2) G.R. No. 94071 (2) G.R. No. 95322 (2) G.R. No.
95529 (2) G.R. No. 95546 (1) G.R. No. 95582 (3) G.R. No.
95641 (2) G.R. No. 95696 (2) G.R. No. 95696. March 3 (2) G.R.
No. 97336 (2) G.R. No. 97626 (2) G.R. No. 97753 (2) G.R. No.
99301 (2) G.R. No. L-12189 (2) G.R. No. L-12190 (1) G.R. No.
L-12191 (2) G.R. No. L-12219 (2) G.R. No. L-12736 (2) G.R. No.
L-14441 (1) G.R. No. L-14441 December 17 (1) G.R. No. L-
14986 (2) G.R. No. L-15126 (2) G.R. No. L-15184 (2) G.R. No.
L-18657 (2) G.R. No. L-18924 (2) G.R. No. L-18965 (3) G.R.
No. L-18979 (1) G.R. No. L-19189 (2) G.R. No. L-19550 (2) G.R.
No. L-2294 (2) G.R. No. L-23145 (1) G.R. No. L-23145
November 29 (2) G.R. No. L-23241 (2) G.R. No. L-23276 (2)
G.R. No. L-23678 (2) G.R. No. L-24803 (2) G.R. No. L-24978 (2)
G.R. No. L-34539 July 14 (1) G.R. No. L-3497 (1) G.R. No. L-
35095 (2) G.R. No. L-35262 (2) G.R. No. L-35283 (2) G.R. No.
L-36481-2 (2) G.R. No. L-37750 (2) G.R. No. L-38037 (2) G.R.
No. L-47739 (2) G.R. No. L-48006 (3) G.R. No. L-4818 (2)
G.R. No. L-48757 (3) G.R. No. L-48796 (2) G.R. No. L-
49101 (2) G.R. No. L-49188 (2) G.R. No. L-49390 (2) G.R. No.
L-4963 (1) G.R. No. L-4977 (2) G.R. No. L-50373 (2) G.R. No. L-
50959 (2) G.R. No. L-51806 (2) G.R. No. L-51832 (2) G.R. No.
L-56169 June 26 (1) G.R. No. L-56487 (2) G.R. No. L-56655 (2)
G.R. No. L-81827 (3) G.R. No. L-8385 (2) G.R. No. L-8451
(2) G.R. No. L-8527 (1) G.R. No. L-8844 (2) G.R. No. L-9356 (2)
G.R. No.113558 (1) G.R. No.148496 (1) G.R. No.L-17312 (1)
G.R. No.L-4611 (1) G.R. Nos. 105965-70 (1) G.R. Nos. 113255-
56 (2) G.R. Nos. 118498 & 124377 (2) G.R. Nos. 128833 (1)
G.R. Nos. L-21353 and L-21354 (2) G.R. Nos. L-25836-37 (2)
G.R. Nos. L-28324-5 (2) G.R.No. 113899 (1) G.R.No. 115024
(2) G.R.No. 118367 (1) G.R.No. 131166 (1) G.R.No. 137775 (1)
G.R.No. 154514 (1) G.R.No. 159747 (1) G.R.No. L-22375 (1)
G.R.No. L-9671 (1) G.R.No.113558 (1) G.R.Nos. 128833 (1)
gaap (2) Gaisano Cagayan v Insurance Company of North
America (1) gallardo v morales (1) gan v yap (1) Ganzon v. CA
(2) Garcia – Recio v Recio (1) Garcia – Recio vs Recio (1)
garcia v gatchalian (1) Garcia v Hongkong Fire Marine
Insurance Co (1) garcia v lacuesta (1) Garcia v. Llamas (2)

Gashem Shookat Baksh v CA (1) Gatbonton v. NLRC and
Mapua (2) Gatchalian v Delim (1) Gelano v. CA (2) Gempesaw
v. CA (2) General Indorser (3) general power of
appointment (2) General Principles on Insurance (4)

General Provisions (2) generally accepted international law
(2) Gercio v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada (1) German
Garcia v The Hon Mariano M Florido et al (1) gil v murciano
(1) gilchrist v cuddy (1) golden notes (1) Gonzales v. RCBC (2)
Good Father of a Family (3) GR 138322 (1) GR No.

139465 (1) GR No. L-26001 (2) Gr. No. 113213 (1) GR. NO.
148571 (1) GR. NO. 153675 (1) GR. NO. 157977 (1) grammar
(2) grammar rules (2) grammatical error (2) grand union
supermarket v jose espino (1) grandfather rule (2) Great

Asian Sales Center Corp. v. CA (2) Great Eastern Life Ins. Co.
v. Hongkong Shanghai Bank (2) Great Pacific Life Assurance
Corp v CA (1) GSIS v. CA (1) guide (1) guingon v Del Monte (1)
Gulf Resorts Inc v Philippine Charter Insurance Corp (1)
Gullas v. PNB (2) he or she (1) Heirs of Borlado v Vda De
Bulan (1) Heirs of Loreto C. Maramag v Maramag (1) heirs of
pdro tayag v hon fernando alcantara (1) Hi Cement Corp. v.
Insular Bank (1) Hi-Cement Corp. v. Insular Bank (1) him or
her (1) Holder in Due Course (2) honasan case (1) Honasan v
The Panel of Investigating Prosecutor (1) hong kong v. hon

olalia jr (1) Hong Kong v. Hon. Olalia Jr. (1) human rights
(11) human rights law (13) human rights law case

digest (7) icasiano v icasiano (1) Ilano v. CA (2) illegal
provision in a will (1) illegitimate children (1) imelda marcos
(1) immediate cause of which was the peril insured against
(1) importance of accounting (1) in contemplation of death
(2) In Re Mario v Chanliongco (1) in re will of riosa (1) Inc (4)
Inc v Home Insurance (2) Inc v. CA (2) Inc v. Register of
Deeds of Manila (2) Inc. v. CA (2) incapable of pecuniary

estimation (1) income tax (2) Incomplete instruments (2)
indeterminate sentence law (4) insanity (1) installment

sales law (1) Insular Drugs v. PNB (2) insular life assurance
co v ebrado (1) insurance (134) insurance act (1)
insurance agent (1) Insurance Broker (1) insurance

case digest (72) insurance code (5) insurance
law reviewer (2) insurance notes (3) insurance notes
outline (3) Insurance reviewer (1) Insured Outlives Policy (1)

Integrated Packing v CA (1) intent (2) interest (1) interest of
20% (1) Interference with Contractual Relations (2)
International Corp. Bank v. CA (2) international law (1)
international law vs municipal law (1) International taxation
(2) interpretation of treaties (1) intod v. ca (2) intoxication (1)
Introduction to Negotiable Instruments (6) Invalid

Designation (4) inventory (2) invoice requirements (2) IPL
(2) IPL case digest (2) Irrevocable Designation (2) Isaac v AL
Ammen Trans Co (1) j marketing v Sia (1) jaboneta v gustilo
(1) Jai-Alai Corp. of the Phil. v. BPI (2) Jan 18 (1) Jan. 18 (1)
January 11 (2) January 15 (3) January 16 (1) January 18
(2) January 19 (5) January 21 (4) January 22 (5)
January 23 (2) January 25 (2) January 28 (9) January 29
(9) January 30 (10) January 31 (13) January 5 (2)

jarco marketing v ca (1) Joaquinita P Capili v Sps Dominador
and Rosalita Cardana (1) judge fernando vil pamintuan (1)
judicial claim (1) Judicial Construction Cannot Alter Terms (1)
judicial declaration of presumptive death (1) July 11 (2) July
13 (1) July 14 (7) July 16 (1) July 17 (2) July 18 (2) July 19
(8) July 20 (2) July 21 (4) July 23 (4) July 24 (2) July 26
(2) July 27 (2) July 28 (3) July 29 (2) july 3 (2) July 30 (9)
July 31 (10) July 5 (2) July 6 (2) July 8 (3) June 11 (2)
June 12 (2) June 15 (2) June 16 (2) June 19 (4) June 2 (2)
june 20 (3) June 21 (2) June 22 (4) June 25 (2) June 26
(2) June 27 (4) June 28 (2) June 29 (3) June 30 (5)
June 5 (4) June 6 (2) June 8 (5) Juris Doctor

(660) jurisdiction (7) jurisprudence
(425) Jurisprudence: G.R. No. 153468 (2)
Jurisprudence: G.R. No. 173594 (1) kalaw v relova (1)
kapunan (1) Kierulf v CA (1) Kinds (1) kinds of damage (1)
Korean Airlines Co. LTd v. CA (2) kuroda v jalandoni (2) labor
(4) labor law (4) labor relations (2) Lambert v. Fox (2)
Lampano v. Jose (1) Land Titles and Deeds (14) Land
Titles and Deeds Case Digest (7) Land Titles and
Deeds Notes (5) Land Titles and Deeds Notes Outline (1)
lanters products inc v ca (1) last clear chance (6) law (4)
law reviewer (1) law reviewer political law (2) laws (2) lawyer
(2) lawyer laughs (1) lawyers code (1) lawyers code of
professional responsibility (1) lawyers oath (1) lawyers
pledge (1) Lazatin v Twano (1) Lee v. CA (2) legal effect (3)
legal ethics (1) legal jokes (2) legal period (2) legal updates
(1) legitimation (2) lethal ethics (1) Lex Posterioni Derogati
Priori (2) Liabilities (1) Liabilities did not sign (1) Liabilities of
Parties (2) Liabilities of person who did not sign (1)
liabilities of the parties (17) Liability for Torts (4)

liability of an agent (2) liability of insurer for suicide and
accidental death (1) Liang v. People (2) lifeblood theory (2)
Lim v. Executive Secretary (2) litonjua v montilla (1) llorente v
ca (1) Llorente vs CA (1) locus standi (2) Lopez v Del Rosario
and Quiogue (1) Lopez v Pan American (1) loss (1) loss
caused by negligence of the insurance (1) LRTA v. Navidad
(2) Magellan Mfg Marketing Corp v CA (1) Makati Sports Club

Inc v. Cecile Cheng (2) mala in se (2) Malayan Insurance v CA
(1) Malayan Insurance Co v Arnaldo (1) malice (3) malum

prohibitum (2) mamba v. lara (2) Manila Bank v. CIR (2006)
(2) Manila Lighter Transportation Inc. v. CA (2) Manila Metal
Container Corp. v. PNB (1) Manuel v. People (2) Marcelo
Macalinao v Eddie Medecielo Ong (1) March 1 (3) March 13
(2) March 14 (5) March 15 (4) March 16 (3) March 18
(2) March 19 (8) March 2 (2) March 20 (3) March 22 (2)
March 24 (2) March 26 (4) March 27 (6) March 28 (7)
March 3 (4) March 30 (9) March 31 (7) March 7 (2)

March 9 (4) marcos (1) Marcos v. Judge Fernando Vil.
Pamintuan (1) Maria Benita A. Dulay v The Court of Appeals
(1) marinduque v workmens (1) marriage (2) marriage
certificate (1) martial law (1) master of business and
administration (1) Maulini v. Serrano (2) May 1 (2) May 16 (2)
May 18 (5) May 19 (4) may 20 (4) May 23 (2) May 25

(2) May 26 (2) May 28 (1) May 29 (3) may 30 (3) May 31
(6) May 6 (2) May 8 (4) May 9 (2) MBA (5) MBA Notes
(4) mcit (2) me or I (1) measure of indemnity (1) measure of
insurable interest (1) mejoff v. director of prisons (4)
Memorize (1) memory aid (4) mercantile law (8)

mercantile law review (3) Merida Waterworks District v.
Bacarro (2) Metrobank v. CA (2) Metrobank v. FNCB (2)
Metropolitan Bank and Trust Co. v. Cablizo (2) miciano v
brimo (1) Mijares v CA (1) Mijares v. Ranada (2005) (1)
Miranda Ribaya v Carbonell (1) Misamis Lumber Corp. v.
Capital Ins and Surety Co (1) mistake of fact (4) mistake
of fact is not a defense (2) mitigating circumstances (2)
Mitigation of Liability (1) Montinola v. PNB (2) Moral Damage
for Labor Cases (1) moral damages (1) Moral Damages on

Taking of Life (2) Moran v. CA and Citytrust Bank (2) morgan
v commissioner (2) mortgage (2) mortgagor (4) mortis
causa (2) motion jokes (1) motive (2) Motor Vehicle Liability
Insurance (2) Mr. and Mrs. Amador C Ong v Metropolitan
Water District (1) Murder (2) mutual insurance companies (1)
MWSS v. CA (2) Nario v Philippine American Life Insurance
Co of Canada (1) National Power v Philipp Brothers (1)
national steel corp v ca (1) Natividad V. Andamo v IAC (1)
naturalization (1) Nature of Certificate of Stock (4) Nava

v. Peers Marketing Corp (2) Negotiable Instruments (4)
Negotiable Instruments Case Digest

(76) Negotiable Instruments Codals (2) Negotiable
Instruments Law (143) Negotiable Instruments
Memorize (1) Negotiable Instruments Notes (8)
Negotiable Instruments Notes Outline (1) negotiation (1)
nepomuceno v ca (1) New Life Enterprises v Court of Appeals
(1) No conflicts rule on essential validity of contracts (1) no
designation (1) No frustrated rape (2) nocon (1) Northwest
Orient Airlines Inc v CA (1) notes (2) notice and hearing (1)
Notice of Dishonor (4) November 1 (1) November 14

(6) November 16 (2) November 19 (4) November 2 (3)
November 20 (4) November 23 (5) November 25 (3)
November 5 (2) November 6 (4) November 7 (1) November
8 (2) nso (1) nso documents (1) nterpretation of treaties (1)
October 1 (2) October 10 (3) October 12 (6) October 13
(2) October 14 (2) October 15 (1) October 17 (2) October 18
(2) October 19 (5) October 2 (2) October 21 (4) October
23 (4) October 24 (2) October 25 (6) October 28 (2)

October 30 (6) October 31 (1) October 6 (2) october 7 (2)
October 8 (6) offset if intimately related (1) Oh Cho v.
Director of Lands (1) Ong Lim Sing v. FEB Leasing Finance
Corp. (1) Ong Yong v. Tiu (2) oposo v factoran (1) opposo v
factoran (1) opulencia v ca (1) ortega v valmonte (1) other
(3) others (1) Outline (7) Overbreadth doctrine (2) P.D.

1529 (1) Pacheco v. CA (2) Pacific Timber v CA (1) Padgett v.
Babcock (2) PAL v CA (2) Palileo v Cosio (1) Palting v. San
Jose Petroleum (2) panaguiton jr v doj (1) Panasonic v. CIR
(2010) (1) Paris-Manila Perfume Co v Phoenix Assurance (1)
part 1 (2) part 2 (2) part 3 (2) part 4 (1) part four (1) Part One
(2) part three (3) part two (1) passers (2) payment for honor
(2) pb com v. cir (2) pd 1069 (1) PDIC (1) pecuniary interest
(1) pedro elcano v regina hill (1) penalties of 25% surcharge
(1) People v Bagayong (1) people v. ah chong (2) people v.
basao (2) People v. Campuhan (2) People v. Daleba (2)
People v. Dela Cruz (1) People v. Domasian (2) People v.
Fernando (2) people v. go shiu ling (2) people v. gonzales (1)
People v. Lol-lo & Saraw (2) people v. marco (2) People v.
Oanis (2) People v. Opero (2) people v. orita (2) People v.

Ortega (2) People v. Pagador (2) People v. Palaganas (2)
People v. Piliin (2) People v. Pilola (2) People v. Quasha (2)
people v. sia (1) People v. Tan Boon Kong (2) people v. wong
cheng (2) perez v ca (2) perfection (2) Perla Compania De
Seguros v Sps Gaudencio (1) Personal Injury and Death (2)
Personal Notes (27) personally liable (1) persons

(20) persons case digest (3) persons cases (1) persons
secondarily liable (1) Phil American Life Insurance Company

v Ansaldo (1) Phil Export v VP Eusebio (1) phil refining
company v. ca (1) phil. refining company v. ca (1) Philamcare
Health Systems (2) philippine (1) Philippine Airlines v. CA
(3) Philippine American Life Insurance Company v Pineda (1)

Philippine Bank of Commerce v. Jose M. Aruego (2)
philippine blooming mills employment organization v.
philippine blooming mills (2) Philippine Commercial
International Bank v CA (1) Philippine Commercial v CA (1)
philippine health care providers v estrada (1) philippine
lawyer (2) philippine lawyers oath (1) Philippine National
Bank v. Erlando Rodriguez (1) Philippine Phoenix Surety
Insurance Co v Woodworks Inc (1) Philippine Pryce
Assurance Corp v CA (1) Physical Injuries (2) pil (5) pila (9)
pineda v ca (1) pink notes (1) Pioneer Insurance v. CA (2)

Pirovano v. De la Rama Steamship Co. (2) planters product v.
fertiphil corp (1) Planters Product v. Fertiphil Corp. (1) PNB v
(2) pnb v ca (1) PNB v. CA (6) PNB v. National City Bank
New York (2) PNB v. Ritratto Group (2) PNOC v CA (1) poeple
v pirame (1) political law review (2) Ponce v. Alsons Cement
Corp. (2) Porfirio P. Cinco v Hon Mateo Canonoy (1)
possessory action (1) Potenciano v. Reynoso (1) Powers of
Corporate Officers (2) prayer (1) Pre-Corporation Code (2)
Pre-incorporation Subscription (2) Preemptive Rights (4)

prescription (1) Prescription Period (2) Presentment for
acceptance (2) Presentment for Payment (2) preterition of
surviving spouse (1) primary jurisdiction (2) private suit (2)
pro reo doctrine (1) producers bank v ca (1) Professional
Services (2) Professional Services Inc v Natividad and
Enrique Agana (1) Promissory Notes (14) Proof and

Proximate Cause (5) proof beyond reasonable doubt (2)
proof of filiation (6) prosecution of offenses (4)
Protest (2) proximate cause (6) Prudencio v. CA (2)
Prudential Bank v. IAC (2) PUBLIC ACT NO. 521 (1) Public
Enemy (1) Public humiliation (2) public international

law (12) public international law case (7) public
international law case digest (7) public suit (2) Public
Utilities (2) Purchase Agreement (2) Qua Chee Gan v Law
Union and Rock Insurance Co Ltd (1) qualified by (1) quasi
delict (5) Quasi-delict (7) Quasi-negotiable Character of

Certificate of Stock (2) Quinto v. Andres (2) Quirante v IAC (1)
R.A. 8799 (1) Raagas v Traya (1) rabadilla v ca (1)

radiowealth finance v. del rosario (2) rafael partricio v ca (1)
Ramos v CA (1) Rationale for Centralized Management
Doctrine (2) rcbc v. cir (2) Real Estate Mortgage (1) real party
in interest (2) red notes (1) refund (1) Registered Lands (1)
registration of property (1) reinsurance (1) Release from
Subscription Obligation (2) remedial law (7) remedial law
digest (2) remedy (2) Remo Jr. v. IAC (2) replevin (1) Republic
of the Phils. v. BPI (2) Republic Planters Bank v. CA (2)
republic v. bagtas (1) Republic v. Ebrada (2) Requisites of
Double insurance (1) Requisites of negotiability (8) Res
Ipsa Loquitur (4) res ipso loquitor (1) Restriction on

Transfer (2) retroactivity of procedural rules (2) review (1)
reviewer (7) revised penal code (2) revised rules of court (1)
revocable Designation (1) reyes v ca (1) right against
warrantless searches and seizures (2) Right of First
Refusal (4) right of subrogation (1) Right of the holder (2)

Rights (1) Rights of a holder (2) Rights of Holder (1) Rights of
Holder against general indorser (1) Rights of the holder
(6) Rights to Certificate of Stock for Fully Paid Shares (1)

Rivera v. People (2) Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation v
CA (1) rmc (1) rodelas v aranza (1) rodrigo concepcion v ca
(1) Rodriguez (2) Rodriguez v. Hon. Presiding Judge of RTC
Manila Branch 17 (2) Roman Catholic Apostolic

Administrator of Davao v. LRC (2) Roman Catholic Bishop of
Malolos v. IAC (2) roxas v de jesus (1) rpc (1) rtc (2) rul 39 (1)
rule 110 (3) rule 111 (1) rule 60 (1) rule on summary
procedure (1) rules of court (2) Rules on cover notes (1)
Sadaya v. Sevilla (2) Salas v. CA (2) sales (1) Sales de
Gonzaga v Crown Life Insurance Co (1) samar mining v
nordeutcher lloyd (1) san beda (1) san beda law (3) San
Carlos Milling v. CIR (2) San Juan Structural v. CA (2) San
Miguel Brewery v Law Union (1) sante v. claravall (1) saudi

arabian airlines v ca (2) Saura Import Export Co v Philippine
International Surety Co (1) sc (1) sc 173 (1) sec 12 (1) sec 13
(1) sec 1314 (1) Sec 17 (1) sec 177 of the insurance code (1)
Sec 18 (1) Sec 189 (1) sec 28 (1) sec 77 (2) sec 84 (1) Sec. 1 -
8 (1) Sec. 17 - 23 (1) Sec. 21 (1) Sec. 24 - 29 (1) Sec. 3 (4)
Sec. 30-50 (1) Sec. 39 (2) Sec. 51-59 (1) Sec. 9 - 16 (1) Sec. of
Justice v. Hon. Lantion (2) Sec.39 (2) SECOND DIVISION

(46) second part (1) secondarily liable (1) secs 24 to 29 (1)
Section 63 (2) securities and exchange commission (2)
securities regulation code (1) Security Bank v. Rizal
Commercial (2) Seguritan v. People (2) senator honasan (2)
senator kiko pangilinan (1) senior citizen discount (2)
sentence (1) Sep 21 (1) Separate Juridical Personality (1)
Sept. 24 2002 (1) september (1) September 1 (4)
September 11 (4) September 12 (2) September 14 (4)

september 30 (4) September 4 (2) September 5 (4)

September 7 (2) sharon cuneta (1) Sharuff Co v Baloise Fire
Insurance Co (1) siliman (1) Silkair v. CIR (2) simple loan (2)
Singapore Airlines v Hon Ernani Cruz Pano (1) SMART
Communications v. Astrorga (1) So Ping Bun v ca (1) Social
Security System v Davac (1) South African Airways v. CIR
(2010) (2) South Sea Surety and Insurance Co v CA (1)
Southern Luzon Employees and Ass v Golpeo (1) Special
Rules on Experts and Professionals (2) Spouses Gironella v.
PNB (2) src (1) SSS v Aguas (2) St Louis Realty Corporation v
ca (1) State Investment House Inc. v. CA (2) stipulation
pour autrui (3) Stipulations Cannot Be Segregated (2)

Stock and Transfer Book (2) Stockholders of F. Guanzon and
Sons (2) Stonehill v. Diokno (2) Strebel v Figueros (1) Strong
Juridical Personality (2) study guide (1) sulpicio v ca (2)
Sumaplong v CA (1) supply (1) supreme court (3) surety
bond (1) sweet lines v teves (1) tagsibol (1) tagsibol book (1)
Tai Tong Chuache v Insurance Commission (1) Tan v. SEC (2)
Tan v. Sycip (2) Tanco Jr v Philippine Guaranty Co (1) tax (1)
tax 2 (10) tax 2 case digest (5) tax avoidance (2) tax
case digest (18) tax credit (3) tax evasion (2) tax
exemption (5) tax laws (1) tax refund (7) taxation
(23) Tayag v. Benguet (2) teleserv (1) Templation Inc (2)
territoriality principle (1) The Universal Declaration on Human
Rights (1) Theory of Concession (2) THIRD DIVISION

(36) third part (1) tinga (1) Tiong v. Ting (2) To whom
insurance proceeds payable (1) top 10 (1) top 3 bar exam tips
torts and damages (172) torts

(1) torts (4)
and damages case digest (79) torts and

damages notes outline (5) Traders Royal Bank v. CA (2)
Traders Royal Bank v. Radio Philippines Network Inc (2)
transcendental importance (1) Transfers (2)
transportation (53) transportation case digest

(27) Transportation notes (1) transportation notes outline (1)
Travel-On v. CA (2) Treachery (2) Triple Eight v NLRC (1) Ty v
First National Surety and Assurance Co Inc (1) Types of
Acquisitions (2) Types of Acquisitions/Transfers (2) U.S.
Jurisprudence (1) U.S. v. Bull (2) ultra vires (2) ultra vires act
(1) unfair labor practice (2) Unfounded Suits (4) United
States v. Wells (2) universal (1) universal declaration on

human rights (1) university of the philippines (1) unjust
dismissal (2) up law (1) up law review (1) US (4) US
Jurisprudence (2) us v baggay (1) us v pineda (1) us v. ah

sing (1) us v. look chaw (2) USA v. Hon. Purganan (1) uson v
del rosario (1) ust (1) ust golden notes (1) ust notes (1) uy
kaio eng v nixon lee (1) uy v sandiganbayan (1) valenzuela v
ca (2) Valenzuela v. People (2) Valle Verde Country Club v.
Africa (2) Vda Dde Consuegra v Governments Service
Insurance System (1) Velasco v. People (2) Velasquez v.
Solidbank Corp (2) Verendia v CA (1) Vicente R. de Ocampo v.
Gatchalian (2) Villanueva v Oro (1) Villanueva v. Nite (2)
Vinuya v. Malaya Lolas Organization (2) Violago v. BA
Finance Corp (2) Violation of Civil and Political Rights (1)

Violation of Human Dignity and Privacy (2) Voluntary
Dealings (1) Voting Trust Agreements (2) waiver (2) Wee Sion
Ben v. Semexco/Zest Markering Corp (2) when corporate
officers (1) When Insurable Interest Must Exist (1) when
negligent (2) White Gold Marine Services Inc v Pioneer
Insurance Surety Corp (1) Who are liable after dissolution (2)
Who Exercises Rights of Minor Insured or Beneficiaries (1)
Who may recover (3) who or whom (1) wills and

succession (38) withholding agent (2) Wright v Manila
Electric (1) Wright v. CA (1) writing (1) Yang v. CA (2) you and
i (1) you and me (1) zaldiva v reyes (1) zero rated (1)
Return to top of page © Copyright 2013 • Philippine Legal Guide •

Restaurant Review | Filipino Blog | Philippine Deals
All rights reserved

Saudi Arabian Airlines Vs CA

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Saudi Arabian Airlines Vs CA

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

About Case Digest List Bar Exam Subjects Reviewer Jurisprudence

Legal Updates Legal Jokes English 101

Home RSS Twitter Facebook My Food Blog My Travel Blog

Laws Applicable: Art 19 and 21 of Civil

Mr. Miniewy. Khalid of the ► February (4)

SAUDIA office brought her to a ► 2012 (76)

and they told her to remain in Philippine Deals

o It is a conflict of laws that

ISSUE: W/N the RTC of Quezon City has

HELD: YES. petition for certiorari is

o Morada is a resident Philippine

o Simple: one of the parties to a

o private interest of the litigant

o By filing her Complaint and

o (1) What legal system should

o Morada was made to face trial

o taken into account and

Labels: 1998, Case Digest,

Newer Post Home Older Post

No. RTJ-07-2062 (1) A.M. RTJ-07-2062 (1) abandoned (1)

Aboitiz Shipping Corp v Insurance Co of North America (1)

ABSCBN v. CA (1) acceptance (2) acceptance by obligee (1)

Document (10) Actual or Compensatory Damage (1)

Allied Banking Corp. v. CA (2) Allied Banking Corp. v. Lim Sio

Wan (2) allowable administrative expenses (2) Alteration

(8) alvarado v galviola (1) Ambiguous Provisions Interpreted

Ancillary Contracts (3) Ang v. Associated Bank (2)

Bank and Conrado Cruz v. CA (2) Associated Bank v. CA (1)

assumed within the purview of general rule (1) Astro

Electronics Corp. v. Phil. Export (2) ateneo (2) ateneo law

(6) ateneo law school (1) Atrium Management Corp. v. CA (2)

August 1 (2) August 10 (2) August 11 (4) August 12 (3)

August 15 (3) August 17 (4) August 18 (2) August 20

30 (1) August 31 (9) August 5 (1) August 6 (6) August 9

(2) Authoried Driver Clause (1) Authority to Receive Payment

(1) Authority to Receive Payment/Effect of Payment (1)

aznar v garcia (1) azuela v ca (1) Bachrach Motor Co v.

Lacson Ledesma (2) Bachrach v British American Assurance

baleros v. people (2) Baliwag Transit Corp. v. CA (1) baliwag

(1) Bellis vs Bellis (1) benguet electric cooperative v ca (1)

Bernabe Castillo et al v Hon Court of Appeals (1) bicolandia

(3) Bonifacio Bros v Mora (1) bonnevie v. ca (1) book (1)

holding bv v stratessecretaris van financier (1) bp 22 (2) bpi

British Airways v. CA (2) british american tobacco v. camacho

(2) Bull v. United States (2) burden of proof in accrual method

(2) business (1) Business Economics (3) Business

Inc. v. CA and Security Bank and Trust Co (1) Caltex v

Sulpicio Lines (1) Calvo v UCPB Gen Insurance Co (1) Caneda

Jr. v. CA (2) caneda v ca (1) Cangco v MRR (1) canlas v ca (1)

(1) capital loss (2) Carlos Arcona y Moban v CA (1) carriage

(1) CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT (2) Carrier or

Depositary (1) Carry-over (2) case (6) Case C-168/ (1)

Case Digest (377) case digests (9) case

Corp. v. CA (2) cenomar (1) centennial prayer (1) Centralized

Management Doctrine (2) Cerrano v Tan (1) certainty (2)

Certificate of stock (2) Cha v CA (1) characteristics of

human rights (4) characterization (2) charter party (4)

CIR v. Aichi Forging Company (2010) (2) cir v. estate of

review (5) civil procedure (3) civil procedure codals (1)

Provision Given Ordinary Meaning (1) Co v. Admiral United

Responsibility (1) codoy v calugay (1) cogsa (1) Cometa v CA

(1) commerce (1) commercial law (2) commercial law review

(1) commercial law reviewer (1) commodatum (1) common