Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
14(2):201-207
Copyright © Faculty of Engineering, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Print ISSN: 1596-2490, Electronic ISSN: 2545-5818, www.azojete.com.ng
Adefisan, O.O.
(Department of Wood Products Engineering, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.)
Email Address: femiadefisan@hotmail.com, oo.adefisan@mail.ui.edu.ng
Abstract
The cost of synthetic resin used for composites production is increasing. Low cost durable glue may be
derived from disused polystyrene foams and used in wood composites production. This work therefore
examined the strength and sorption properties of polystyrene bonded composites made from particles of
Mahogany (Khaya ivorensis) and Teak (Tectona grandis). Particles of K. ivorensis and T. grandis were mixed
with polystyrene (PS) glue in ratios 1:1, 2:1, 1:2 and 3:1, and formed into boards. Functional properties of the
PS glue were examined using Fourier Transformed Infrared Radioscopy. Strength and sorption tests were
conducted on specimens in accordance with ASTM standards. The results obtained revealed that the glue
possessed hydroxyl, phenyl and aromatic functional groups that enhanced the strength and stability. The
fabricated boards possessed moderate strength and dimensional stability indicating their use as indoor
insulating components. Increase in the glue content significantly improved the strength and sorption properties
of the composites. Optimum flexural properties were obtained at glue mixing ratio of 2:1.
1.0 Introduction
A lot of waste is generated worldwide due to daily human activities. Prominent amongst these are
wood wastes which occur due to poor sawing patterns, lack of expertise of the machine operators,
use of obsolete facilities, etc. and polystyrene foam, a petroleum based polymer of styrene used for
insulation and packaging. While wood wastes are hazardous to the mill, the mill workers, the wood
and the wood products, polystyrene which has a low scrap value is not biodegradable. Therefore,
these items are mostly disposed of in landfills resulting in environmental pollution (Kwon et al.,
2009; Kan and Demirboga, 2009; Ricky et al., 2010). A means of curtailing these deleterious effects
could be in the production of wood polymer composites. Wood Polymer Composites (WPCs)
incorporate wood particles as fillers and reinforcing agents while the polymer acts as matrix. They
are lightweight, environmentally friendly products with increased hardness, improved dimensional
stability, and possess abrasion and decay resistance. They can be integrated in furniture items such as
table tops, cabinet manufacture and in low cost building components such as floor and wall tiles,
ceiling boards etc. (Poletto, 2016).
While wood (fibres or particles) is hydrophilic in nature which may negatively affect the mechanical
properties of the derived composite products, most synthetic resins which are used for bonding wood
composites on the other hand oftentimes emit toxic substances. Incorporation of polystyrene based
resin has been reported to reduce the emission of toxic substances and moisture uptake due to the
hydrophobicity of polystyrene. These properties of polystyrene when incorporated in composite
production may enhance the mechanical properties (Osemeahon and Dimas, 2014). This is more so
since the deployment of polystyrene based resins in the production of polymer composites seems a
sustainable practice of utilizing polystyrene and wood wastes. The effect of polystyrene based resins
on properties of composites products made from Nigerian grown wood species is sparse in literature.
Therefore, this work examined the strength and sorption properties of polystyrene based polymer
composites made from Teak (Tectona grandis) and Mahogany (Khaya ivorensis) wood particles.
Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment, June, 2018; Vol. 14(2):201-207.
ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545-5818; www.azojete.com.ng
while the thickness swelling (T.S) was expressed as a percentage of the original thickness as
T T
T.S = 2 1 x 100% …………………………(2)
T
1
Where:
W1 is the initial weight
W2 is the final weight
T1 is the initial thickness
T2 is the final thickness
Adefisan, Evaluation of Strength and Sorption Properties of Polystyrene Bonded Composites of Mahogany
(Khaya ivorensis) and Teak (Tectona grandis) Woods. AZOJETE, 14(2):169-171 ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN
2545-5818, www.azojete.com.ng
3.2 Density
The densities of the Mahogany (K. ivorensis) and Teak (T. grandis) composites were between 379.8
and 780.3 kg/m3 and 341.9 and 635.1 kg/m3 respectively (Table 2). These values indicate that the
composites are lightweight / medium weight products. Statistical analyses (Duncan’s multiple range
test) revealed that the mixing ratio and wood species significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected the densities of
the composites (Table 2). Boards bonded with higher mixing ratios of polystyrene recorded
significantly higher densities (Table 2). What this suggests is that increasing the glue content during
board production improved the interfacial bonding between the wood particles. Also, composites
bonded with Mahogany particles had significantly higher densities than those of Teak suggesting
higher strength properties.
203
Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment, June, 2018; Vol. 14(2):201-207.
ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545-5818; www.azojete.com.ng
low flexural properties may be attributed to the low density profiles of the fabricated boards.
Generally, boards with higher densities and higher mixing ratio recorded higher MORs and MOEs.
This may be due to the enhanced interfacial bonding between the wood particles with increasing glue
content. Statistical analyses (Duncan’s multiple range test) revealed that the mixing ratio and the
wood species significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected the MORs and MOEs of the composites (Table 3).
Also, composites fabricated with Mahogany particles recorded higher MOR than those of Teak. This
may be possibly due to the higher density profiles of the Mahogany composites in comparison with
those of Teak. As shown in Tables 2 and 3, the deployment of 2:1 mixing ratio in the composites
production seemed to yield the optimum flexural properties.
Teak Composites
f
1:1 341.9 (37.7) 4.9g (0.0) 24,847b (2255.9)
1:2 406.8e (3.1) 7.1d (0.02) 28,824b (72.1)
2:1 520.3d (34.4) 8.4b (0.02) 77,249a (7998.6)
3:1 635.1b (41.8) 5.2e (0.01) 23,746b (1679.8)
Means with the same letters and columns are not statistically different
* Significant at 5% level of probability
Table 3: Duncan’s Test of the effect of Wood Species, Glue Type and Mixing Ratio on the Density,
MOR and MOE of Mahogany and Teak Composites
Wood Species Density (kg/m3) MOR (N/mm2) MOE (N/mm2)
Mahogany 524.7a (176.1) 7.6a (3.33) 6,803.0b (526.6)
Teak 476.0b (120.2) 6.4b (1.41) 38,666.0a (2362.7)
Mixing Ratio
1:1 360.9c (34.5) 4.9 d (0.0) 13,17.2 c (1287.0)
1:2 387.5c (21.6) 7.2 b ( 0.14 ) 1,601.0 bc (1405.5)
2:1 545.5b (38.0) 10.6 a (2.47) 4,267.8 a(3820.7)
3:1 707.7a (84.2) 5.4 c (0.18) 1,907.8 b (522.2)
Means with the same Letters and in the columns are not statistically different
* Significant at 5% Probability level
5.2%. These values compared favourably with those of Voulgardis et al., (2003). Results of the WA
and TS showed that the composites had high sorption properties and cannot be used in outdoor
applications.
However, statistical analyses (Duncan’s Test, Table 6) revealed that the soaking time, wood species
and mixing ratios significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected the WA of the composites.
Table 4: Water Absorption of Polystyrene Based Mahogany and Teak Composites
Mixing Ratio Water Absorption (%)
2h 24h 48h 72h
Mahogany Composites
fg cde
1:1 61.5 (8.4) 89.8 (19.0) 96.2cd (17.0) 104.5c (10.9)
1:2 49.0g (7.8) 74.0ef (4.4) 78.2e (12.3) 95.7cd (5.7)
2:1 13.2ijklm (2.5) 22.9hij (1.3) 24.8hi (1.2) 30.3h (3.2)
3:1 2.2m (1.0) 4.6klm (0.7) 6.6jklm (0.9) 9.3jklmi (1.4)
Teak Composites
g b
1:1 47.4 (9.1) 122.5 (11.8) 132.7ab (16.3) 140.0a (10.2)
1:2 49.0g (0.3) 75.2ef (0.8) 82.2de (0.9) 97.2cd (1.1)
2:1 21.2hijk (15.0) 48.5g (15.6) 51.0g (14.0) 59.2fg (16.3)
3:1 3.8lm (0.5) 12.0ijklm (4.6) 19.6hijkl (0.8) 25.1hi (1.1)
* Means with the same Letters and in the columns are not statistically different
* Significant at 5% Probability level
Teak Composites
fgh fgh
1:1 0.8 (0.1) 1.5 (0.07) 1.9defgh (0.01) 4.0abcdefg (0.1)
1:2 1.1fgh (0.5) 2.7cdefgh (0.8) 3.2bcdefgh (1.5) 3.6bcdefgh (1.5)
2:1 1.9cdefgh (1.4) 2.5cdefgh (1.4) 2.8bcdefgh (1.3) 3.7bcdefgh (2.1)
3:1 0.3h (0.2) 1.7efgh (0.7) 3.5bcdefgh (0.9) 5.2abcd (1.0)
*Means with the same Letters and in the columns are not statistically different
*Significant at 5% Probability level
205
Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment, June, 2018; Vol. 14(2):201-207.
ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545-5818; www.azojete.com.ng
Table 6: Duncan’s Test of the effect of Soaking Time, Mixing Ratio and Wood Species, on the
Sorption Properties of Mahogany and Teak Composites
Soaking Time (h) WA (%) TS (%)
c
2 30.9 (23.2) 1.5c (1.7)
24 56.2b (40.4) 2.2bc (1.8)
48 61.4b (42.4) 3.1b (2.1)
72 70.2a (44.6) 4.5a (2.2)
Mixing Ratio
1:1 82.0b (20.2) 2.7b (2.2)
1:2 90.4a (35.3) 2.0b (1.6)
2:1 37.6c (27.9) 4.4a (2.4)
3:1 11.9d (10.9) 2.2b (1.9)
Wood Species
Mahogany 47.7b (37.4) 3.1a (2.7)
Teak 61.6a (43.0) 2.5a (1.5)
Means with the same Letters and in the columns are not statistically different
*Significant at 5% Probability leve
Apart from wood species, the TS of the composites were significantly affected by soaking time and
mixing ratios. Mahogany composites made with higher glue mixing ratios had significantly lower
WA in comparison with those made from Teak. This may be attributed to improved interfacial
bonding with increasing glue content, higher density profiles of the Mahogany boards and the
imperviousness of polystyrene to moisture sorption (Osemeahon and Dimas, 2014).
4.0 Conclusions
Disused polystyrene foams are suitable as adhesives for composites production. The fabricated
polystyrene bonded wood composites had moderate strength and sorption properties which can be
adapted for indoor insulating components. Increase in the glue content significantly enhanced the
strength and sorption properties of the fabricated boards.
References
ASTM International (ASTM D 790-07). 2008. Standard test method for flexural properties of
unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. In Annual book of ASTM
Standards (ISSN: 0192-2998 (P)). 08(01), 151- 161. West Conshohocken, PA
Fabiyi, JS. McDonald, AG. and Mcllroy, D. 2009. Wood modification effects on weathering of
hdpe-based wood plastic composites. Journal of Polymer Environment 17(1):34-48
Kan, A. and Demirboga, R. 2009. A new technique of processing for waste-expanded polystyrene
foams as aggregates. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2(9) 2994-3000
Kosonen, M., Gerard, W., Douglas, C. and Gardner, TG. 2000. Polystyrene/wood composites and
hydrophobic wood coatings from water based hydrophilic-hydrophobic block copolymers. Clean
Products and Processes 2 (2000) 117-123
Adefisan, Evaluation of Strength and Sorption Properties of Polystyrene Bonded Composites of Mahogany
(Khaya ivorensis) and Teak (Tectona grandis) Woods. AZOJETE, 14(2):169-171 ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN
2545-5818, www.azojete.com.ng
Kwon, E., Kelly, JW. and Marco, JC., 2009. An investigation into the sngas production from
municipal solid waste (msw) under various pressures and co2 concentration atmospheres, 17th
Annual north waste -to -energy conference, Chantilly, Virginia, USA, proceedings , pp 231-236
Osemeahon SA. and Dimas BJ. 2014. Development of urea formaldehyde and polystyrene waste as
copolymer binder for emulsion paint formulation. Academic Journal 6(3):75 -88
Poletto, M, 2016. Polystyrene cellulose fiber composites: effect of the processing conditions on
mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties. RevistaMateria 21(3): 552-559
Ricky G, Oscar L, and Yusef, S. 2010. An investigation into polystyrene recycling at ubc. dawn mills
apsc 262. The University of British Columbia. pp. 1-18
Voulgardis, EV. Passialis, CN. and Philippou, JL. 2003. Experimental results of reclaimed
polystyrene utilisation in wood products. in: proceedings of 8th international conference on
environmental science and technology Lemnos Island Greece 8-10 September, 2003
207