Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
R.M. MORRISON
Metallurgical Chemistry Section, CANMET, 555 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ont. K1A OG1 (Canada)
ABSTRACT
Morrison, R.M., 1989. The dissolution of silver in ferric sulphate-sulphuric acid media. Hydro-
metallurgy, 21: 67-85.
The dissolution of silver metal in ferric sulphate-sulphuric acid media was studied using the
rotating disk technique. The effects of ferric ion, ferrous ion, acid, trace chloride ion, and total
sulphate concentration as well as temperature, ionic strength and disk rotation speed on the silver
dissolution rate were determined. The reaction rate is fast although its analysis is complicated by
an apparent non-stoichiometric dissolution. Temperature studies at various ferric concentrations
gave an activation energy of 28 kJ mol- 1and this value is typical of a reaction whose kinetics are
fully or partially mass transport controlled. At ferric ion concentrations below 0.5 M, the rate
depended upon the 0.65 power of the ferric ion concentrations whereas at higher concentrations,
the rate was independent of ferric concentration but still was a function of the disk rotation speed.
The reaction rate was simulated well at the lower ferric ion concentrations by the simple Levich-
type laminar flow model and ferric ion diffusion rate control. Ferrous sulphate additions to the
ferric ion solutions gave rate behaviour consistent with thermodynamic arguments based on the
oxidative buffering effect of the ferric-ferrous couple. Sulphate added as sodium sulphate greatly
reduced the silver dissolution rate but the slow reaction is nearly stoichiometric. Added perchlo-
rate at equivalent ionic strength had no significant effect on the rate.
INTRODUCTION
soluble in sulphuric acid solution [2] and thus deleterious equilibrium precip-
itation phenomena should not present a problem. Dutrizac in related work has
reported on the leaching of silver in chloride media [ 3 ].
Generally, the mineralogy of silver is not simple [4]. The native metal oc-
curs but does not predominate. Other common silver minerals include the chlo-
ride, the sulphide and various sulphosalts. Silver also is a constituent in solid
solution with other minerals such as sphalerite, tetrahedrite and galena. Silver
metal is studied here both because it is common and because it offers a rela-
tively simple system for initial study.
Few reports have dealt with the reaction of silver with ferric solutions. In
1950, Salzberg and King [5] studied the rate of corrosion of silver in ferric
sulphate. This work was done before the widespread use of the atomic absorp-
tion spectroscopy analytical technique which allows the measurement of the
trace concentrations of silver generated in model solutions. The dissolved sil-
ver in the Salzberg and King experiments was found by weighing the corroded
silver material as a function of time. The leaching was done under turbulent
conditions and the interpretation of the results and the breadth of the experi-
mental conditions suggest that the solution hydrodynamics were not well
understood. The reaction rate was shown to be dependent on the rotational
speed, and on the silver, ferric and ferrous ion concentrations.
More recent work by Chen et al. [6] reported on the dissolution of silver in
acidic thiourea solutions using iron (III) as an oxidant. They found that the
silver dissolved quickly and that passivation occurred after an hour of reaction.
The ferric ion reaction in the absence of formamidine disulphide (derived from
thiourea) and ligating thiourea was not studied. A study of the reaction of
ferric ion and silver in the sulphate medium may aid in the interpretation and
understanding of the results of Chen et al.
Dutrizac [3] studied the kinetics of ferric chloride leaching (FeC13-NaC1-
HC1) of silver, antimonian silver and silver chloride over the temperature range
45-95 ° C. Silver is found to be rapidly attacked by the ferric chloride with the
accumulation of AgC1 on the surface; similar behaviour is seen for antimonian
silver. The rate of reaction is controlled by the outward diffusion of the Ag (I)
reaction product and is a function of the disk rotation speed. The linear kinet-
ics of silver and antimonian silver leaching are dominated by the kinetics of
silver chloride dissolution.
The rotating disk technique has been used recently as a method of deter-
mining the kinetics of mineral dissolution; e.g., the dissolution of niccolite in
ferric chloride media [ 7 ]. Its use in the study of leaching reactions allows some
insight into the reaction mechanism. The hydrodynamics of the system are
well understood and thus the rate of appearance and disappearance of reac-
tants and products at the disk surface can be modelled under a variety of con-
ditions. Generally, this technique is most useful for reactions under partial or
full solution mass transport control. The easy adjustment of the disk rotational
69
speed (w) allows the testing of the w 1/2 vs. rate relationship required for solely
mass transport rate controlled reactions. Any deviation of the reaction rate
from the model behaviour may be used to infer information on the nature of
the rate controlling step. Moreover, the rotating disk system gives reproducible
rate data which can be used for comparative purposes such as the assessment
of the rate dependence of reagent concentrations and the utility of additives.
Thus, along with the theoretical modelling that the rotating disk technique
allows, empirical correlations between the reaction variables and the reaction
rate also can be made. The kinetics of the dissolution of silver metal in various
ferric sulphate-sulphuric acid media as a function of rotation speed, temper-
ature, ferric ion, ferrous ion, and acid concentration are reported here.
EXPERIMENTAL
Fine silver (99.9%) disks of 13 mm diameter were used. The silver disks
were bound in a 38 mm diameter cylindrical block and attached to an acrylic
stirring shaft. The disk surface was polished to a mirror finish with 1.0 ~m
alumina prior to leaching.
The leaching apparatus and chemicals were the same as described previously
[ 7 ]. Silver and total iron were determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy
and ferrous ion was determined by dichromate titration.
Reaction
The reaction between ferric ion and metallic silver can be formulated ideally
as:
seen from the leaching curves (Fig. 1), silver levels up to 150 mg 1-1 do not
influence the shape of the leaching curve.
The Nernst equation (see Eq. 3 and 5) can be used to calculate the ther-
modynamic driving force of the respective half-cell reactions in the presence
of different concentrations or activities of reactants and products. The simpli-
fying assumption that the concentration is equal to activity is used in the cal-
culations. For the half-cell reaction 2, the standard potential [9] in 0.5 M
H2SO 4 is 0.679 volts (V):
200
• 6 0 min -~
A 200 "
o 350 "
13 1000 "
E lO0-
Fig. 1, Plot of soluble silver against time ( T = 4 0 ° C ; [Fe :~+ ] =0.25 M a n d [H2SO4] =0.15 3/I) for
various disk rotation speeds.
and other experimental conditions will be discussed later. The reaction stoi-
chiometry observed in the experiments, however, differed from the ideal case
typified by reaction 1.
Reaction stoichiometry
2ot
i
* i
.s.
• t.'-''.% " •
• 0•0 • •
1.0
I l I
0.I00 0.200 0.300
SILVER IN SOLUTION ( g !. I)
Fig. 2. Plot of the ferrous/soluble silver ratio as a function of soluble silver concentration.
72
this demonstrates that only ~ 80% of the oxidized silver is solubilized. Sup-
posedly, the remaining oxidized silver is not released from the surface.
Other samples of non-ideal silver dissolution in sulphate media have been
observed. Warren et al. [ 11 ] in their study of the anodic dissolution of silver
sulphide electrodes noted that solid Ag2SO4 formed on the surface although
the experimental conditions were well removed from Ag2SO4 saturation. Other
workers have observed less than 100% current efficiency for the anodic disso-
lution of silver in sulphate media [12,13]. Clearly, the relationship of silver
sulphate solubility, silver precipitation and perhaps silver redissolution under
dynamic oxidizing conditions such as ferric ion leaching or anodic dissolution
in sulphate solutions is important.
Another possibility in this ferric leaching system is silver jarosite formation.
The basic salts of ferric sulphate (AgFe3 (OH) 6 ($O4) 2 in this case ) are insol-
uble in acidic sulphate solutions [ 14 ]. Although higher temperatures favor its
precipitation, silver jarosite probably can be obtained under less severe con-
ditions and in nearly invisible amounts which might hinder the dissolution
kinetics. The behavior of this phase might be indistinguishable from that of
the saturated silver sulphate solutions just described.
The presence of chloride in solution could result in the precipitation of AgC1
on the silver disk surface and could give the apparent non-stoichiometric dis-
solution. Some tests were performed where a small concentration of NaC1 was
added to the leach solutions to demonstrate the effect of the chloride ion on
the leaching curves and these curves are illustrated in Fig. 3. For the 600 mg
l - 1 chloride solutions, the silver concentration was constant at 2 mg l- 1. At 60
mg l-1 chloride, the concentration results were very erratic; there was a sus-
60 C I- Added /
40 .
20 • " 6 0 mq ~ '
./ °~ °
/" / ,k
6oom~,
h ,k
c'
h h A
0.25 0.50 O.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
TIME ( h )
Fig. 3. Effect of trace chloride concentrations on the leaching curves of silver in ferric sulphate
media.
73
pension of AgC1 in the leaching vessel indicating that the dissolution was fol-
lowed by a precipitation phenomenon. At 6 mg l - 1 chloride, the leaching curve
was similar to that obtained in the absence of chloride except that there was
an apparent induction period of 0.5 h when little silver was dissolved. Gener-
ally, however, the effects of gross chloride contamination were not observed in
the ferric sulphate leaching of silver. In fact, some difficulties were encoun-
tered with one batch of ferric sulphate reagent which gave results similar to
the 6 mg l- ~chloride test; this reagent was considered impure and was rejected
for that reason.
After leaching in sulphate media, the surface of the silver disk was matted
white. No identification of the leached surface was attempted. It is not unusual
for a mineral surface to appear different from the original, but such surfaces
generally have no effect on the stoichiometry of the reaction as determined
from the solution analyses. In this leaching system, the solution analyses in-
dicate that the solid phase may contain appreciable amounts of oxidized but
insoluble silver. This conclusion may be important because the solid material
on the disk may eventually hinder the kinetics of the dissolution reaction. In
addition, the formation of a solid phase may be a consequence of the energetics
of the silver metal-oxidized silver surface that is an unknown factor in the
energy calculations previously described.
T H E E F F E C T OF T E M P E R A T U R E ON T H E R A T E OF D I S S O L U T I O N
Figure 4 shows the log r vs. 1/Tplot for silver dissolution in the 0.25 M F e 3+-
0.15 M H2S04 medium. The apparent activation energy is 28 kJ tool -1 (7 kcal
3.6
3.4
3.2
~ 3.0 \:
2.8
2.6 ,\
2.4
I I I I I I 1 i
2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 :3.2 3.3 3.4
IO]l/T (in K "1 )
Fig. 4. Plot of log r against the inverse of temperature for [ Fe 3+ ] = 0.25 M, [ H 2 S 0 4 ] = 0.15 M and
200 m i n - 1.
74
TABLE 1
Apparent activation energies for the dissolution of silver disks in various ferric ion concentrations
(200 min-1; H2S04=0.15 M)
[Fe 3+ ] AH
(M) (kJ/mol)
0.1 26.6
0.25 28.0
0.5 31.9
1.0 20.6
The value of D derived for 40 °C using the datum at 25 °C (4.55 × 10-lo [16],
and assuming an activation energy of 28 kJ tool- 1 ) was 7.3 × 10- lO m 2 s - 1. The
kinematic viscosity derived from the viscosity of water [9] and the calculated
density of the solution was 0.653 × 10 -6 m 2 s-1. The relationship:
r = (107 × 9/55 × 85)Jfe3+ (8)
was used to equate the ferric ion flux to the equivalent silver ion dissolution
75
for the ideal reaction 1. The predicted rate for the 0.25 M Fe3+-0.15 M H2SO4
case is shown in Fig. 5 along with the experimental values. It is seen clearly
that the predicted rates are higher t h a n the experimental rates and the inclu-
sion of an 80% dissolution efficiency factor does not significantly improve the
match of predicted to observed behaviour. The comparison of the magnitude
of the rates predicted by the ferric ion diffusion and by the nature of the ferric
concentration-rate functional relationship indicates, however, that ferric ion
transport is at least partially rate determining.
If the rate of diffusion of ferric ion to the surface is greater t h a n the rate of
reaction of the ferric ion at the surface, then the assumption that Cs = 0 is not
valid. The predicted rate would have to be modified by a factor equal to
(CB-Cs)/CB(= C") to compensate for the slowness of the surface reaction
compared to the diffusion step (cf. Eq. 6 and 7). It is difficult to assign a value
to Cs; thus, it is necessary to derive a value from the experimental rate by
dividing it by the nominal ferric ion concentration. If the surface concentration
were zero, this parameter would be equal to 0.62 D 2/3 v - 1/~ ( = 9.0 at 200 m i n - ' );
i.e., C" = 1. Table 2 shows the factors calculated at 200 m i n - 1 from the least-
squares t r e a t m e n t of the rotational speed dependence data. The calculated
factors are all less than 9.0 as expected, and with the largest ones (lowest sur-
face concentration; i.e., C" closest to unity) at the lowest reactant levels. These
C" values correlate with the ratio of the observed rate to theoretical rate i.e.,
the observed rates vary from 80% (0.01 M Fe :3+ ) to 9% (1.0 M Fe 3+ ) of the
theoretical values. Thus, results at the lower reagent concentrations were bet-
ter simulated by the simple Levich model than the results at the higher reagent
concentrations. This may indicate the effect of the formation of a slowly dis-
I000 --
• ~ / •ill
J, , i i I I i I l I
0 5.0 I0.0
~½ IS i )
Fig. 5. Plot of rate (r) vs. o) li2 for [Fe 3+ ] =0.25 M, T = 4 0 ° C and [H2SO4] =0.15 M.
76
TABLE 2
~'Calculated ferric flux/nominal ferric concentration = 0.62 o) '/21.,'- 1/~D 2/~ ( CB -- Cs ) / CB" If Cs = 0
then the ferric flux/nominal ferric concentration=0.62 w ' / e v - 1 / G D 2 / 3 = 9 . 0 g m -2 h -1 at 200
min -~, T=40°C.
5.0 I
o
S 2.0
_1 I I
-2.0 -I.0 0 1.0
LOG [ Fe 3+ ]
Fig. 6. Plot of log r vs. log [Fe3+ ] at T=40°C and [H2SO4] =0.15 M.
77
MODEL OF ACTIVATION-DIFFUSIONRATECONTROL
TABLE3
2O
I I
..C
o I0
c_
t.
0
-2.0 - 1.0 0.0
LOG [ Fe~* 1
Fig. 7. Plot of [rintl against log [Fe 3+ ] (T=40°C and [H2S04] =0.15 M).
The acid dependence of the rate of silver dissolution at 0.3 M Fe 3+ and 1.0
M Fe 3+ was examined. The two sulphuric acid concentrations of 0.15 M and
1.0 M H2SO4 did not give appreciable variance at either ferric concentration.
The effect of ferrous ion concentration also was studied at two ferric ion
levels under standard conditions (200 min-1, 0.15 M H2S04, 40 °C ). The effect
of ferrous ion concentration on the completeness of silver dissolution cannot
be measured because of the difficulty of determining small amounts of ferrous
ion reaction product against the large ferrous background. Figure 8 shows the
relationship between the rate and the calculated solution potential for the fer-
ric/ferrous couple (Eq. 3) where the standard potential [9] is 0.679 V. The
curves for the two ferric ion concentrations follow the same contour. At low
ferrous concentrations (higher calculated potentials), the rates are high and
do not change significantly with the apparent calculated potential. By con-
trast, at higher ferrous concentrations (low calculated potentials), the rates
are lower and change more significantly with apparent calculated solution po-
80
~e ~
100- • 0.3M
&
• 1.0 M ~-~
.~
80- &//"
A/
N /
~- 4 0 - -
20-
I / [ I I
0.650 0.700 0.750 0.800
CALCULATED SOLUTION POTENTIAL (Volts v$ NHE )
Fig. 8. Plot of the rate of reaction for Fe 3+ = 0.3 and 1.0 M vs. the calculated reversible potential
of the ferric-ferrous medium ( T = 4 0 ° C ; 200 r a i n - l ; [H2SO4] =0.15 M ) .
tential. It is interesting to note that both ferric concentrations exhibit the same
behaviour towards ferrous ion additions suggesting the overall dissolution
mechanism to be the same in both cases.
As mentioned previously, electrochemical reactions are likely to be mass
transport controlled when the overvoltage is greater than 0.3 V. The calculated
potential of reaction 4 at 100 mg 1-1 Ag + using Eq. 5 is 0.47 V; the maximum
and minimum calculated solution potentials of Fe3+/Fe 2+ studied here are
0.82 and 0.67 V, respectively. From the simplistic thermodynamic analysis, it
would be expected that there would be diffusion control at the lower ferrous
concentrations because the calculated potential difference is 0.3 V or greater.
Coupled activation-diffusion control might be expected at high ferrous con-
centrations. Although the variation of the rate with the calculated potential is
as expected, the non-stoichiometric dissolution, the non-integral rate depen-
dence on the ferric ion concentration and the failure of the model to predict
the absolute rate precisely suggest that simple diffusion control is not an exact
model for the reaction system.
E F F E C T OF S U L P H A T E C O N C E N T R A T I O N ON T H E SILVER D I S S O L U T I O N RATE
TABLE 4
TABLE 5
0.0 740
0.1 700
0.25 710
0.5 660
3.0 I I I
2.0
-J
I I I
- 2.0 - 1.0 0 i.o
• oG { [ ~ , s o . ] Aooco ]
Fig. 9. Plot of log r against the log (Na2S04 added).
82
DISCUSSION
Under the conditions used in this investigation, silver displays some unusual
characteristics. The variation of the rate with disk rotational speed and ferric
ion concentration suggests that the reaction is facile. The ferrous ion concen-
trations exert the influence that might be expected from equilibrium argu-
ments. The residue of silver left on the disk is totally unexpected from the
solubility data but similar phenomena have been reported in the literature.
Whether this residue is due to a disequilibrium phenomenon or the slow dis-
solution of a presently uncharacterized intermediate phase is unknown.
The earlier work of Salzberg and King [5] did not measure soluble silver
and they could not have drawn the same conclusions obtained here. There is
fundamental agreement with the thiourea-free ferric ion leaching work of Chen
et al. [6] with respect to reaction rates. There is more work to be done on this
system. The means of attaining complete dissolution, the origin or mechanism
of the layer formed on the silver disk and extensions of this work to other anion
systems such as chloride (see Dutrizac [3] ) are relevant research topics.
The interpretation of the results must include the completeness of the re-
action and the rate of reaction. It is likely that reaction of silver at the surface
does not release all the oxidized silver and is not adequately described by re-
action 1. An alternate expression is reaction 14:
Fe 3+ (aq) ÷ 2Ag(s) ~ F e 2+ (aq) ÷ 0.8Ag + (aq) ÷ (0.2Ag + )Ag(s) (14)
83
where (0.2Ag + ) Ag represents the oxidized silver remaining on the disk. The
reaction rate is fast and is partially controlled by ferric ion diffusion to the
surface. The rate of reaction is not greatly slowed by the presence of the oxi-
dized silver material on the disk. Table 2 indicates that the experimental rates
are 9-80% of the theoretical based on diffusion control of various ferric ion
concentrations. This indicates that the layer may be porous.
Although complex, the silver-ferric reaction in sulphate media can be ra-
tionalized in terms of thermodynamics, mass transport and some form of poorly
soluble silver phase formation. As was discussed briefly, the presence of trace
chloride ion had an effect on the leaching kinetics due to AgC1 formation and
passivation.
Dutrizac [3] has shown that the AgCl dissolution rate dominates the kinet-
ics of silver oxidation in FeCI~-NaC1-HC1 media. At 200 min-1, 80 ° C, 0.3 M
FeC13, 0.3 M NaC1, and 3.0 M HC1, the silver dissolution rate is approximately
150 g m -2 h -1 (Ref. [3], Fig. 8). In similar sulphate solutions at 200 min -1,
80°C, 0.25 M Fe 3+, 0.25 M H2SO4, the rate is 2300 g m -2 h -1. The apparent
activation energies determined in the chloride and sulphate media above are
37.1 and 28.0 kJ mol- 1, respectively. Although both media show diffusion con-
trolled activation energies, the silver dissolves faster in sulphate than in chlo-
ride media (15 times, in this example). The advantage of chloride is that it
gives more reproducible silver deportment in commercial solutions. Silver is
less noble in chloride than in sulphate media, and this means that the soluble
silver is more stable in a chloride than in a sulphate medium. This soluble
oxidized silver is less likely to be reactive and to precipitate from chloride
solution.
There are ramifications of these results concerning other hydrometallurgical
systems. A dynamic model of silver deportment in sulphate systems can be
envisioned: an initial lixiviation reaction releases silver as a soluble species.
Reaction with a reactive sulphide produces a liberated base metal ion and ce-
mented silver sulphide, with the silver sulphide reacting with an oxidizing agent
such as ferric ion to form soluble silver again. If the silver metal dissolves at
only 80-90% efficiency leaving behind insoluble compounds, there will be a net
loss of recoverable silver. If this scenario is correct for commercial systems,
silver chloride precipitation is not the only aspect of silver chemistry impor-
tant to enhanced silver recovery. The identification of the silver phase or
chemistry which causes this phenomenon should be established. MacKinnon
and Brannen [20] have shown silver precipitation on some sulphides in ferric
solution and there also is some cyclic behaviour between precipitation and
redissolution. Beutier et al. [21] have shown that metallic silver can cement
onto some mineral surfaces.
It is interesting to note that in the high sulphate media, the ferrous-soluble
silver ratio is nearer to unity than in lower ferrous sulphate media. If the re-
action proceeds quickly, the kinetics of dissolution are such that there is a local
84
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
1 Drake,H.J., 1980. Silver; Mineralfacts and problems. U.S. Bur. Mines,U.S. Gov. Printing
Office;Bull. 671: 823-837.
2 Dutrizac,J.E., MacDonald,R.J.C. and Lamarche,R.E., 1975.Solubilityof silversulphatein
acidifiedferricsulphate solutions. J. Chem.Eng. Data, 20 (1): 55-58.
85
3 Dutrizac, J.E., 1986. Kinetics of ferric chloride leaching of silver, antimonian silver and silver
chloride. In: R.G. Bautista, R.J. Wesely and G.W. Warren (Editors), Hydrometallurgical
Reactor Design and Kinetics. TMS-AIME Warrendale, Pa., 1-22.
4 Gasparrini, C., 1984. The mineralogy of silver and its significance in metal extraction. CIM
Bull. 77 (866): 99-110.
5 Salzberg, H. and King, C.V., 1950. The rate of corrosion of silver in solutions of ferric sul-
phate. J. Electrochem. Soc., 97: 290-297.
6 Chen, C.K., Lung, T.N. and Wan, C.C., 1980. A study of the leaching of gold and silver by
thioureation. Hydrometallurgy, 5: 207-212.
7 Dutrizac, J.E. and Morrison, R.M., 1984. The leaching of some arsenide and antimonide
minerals in ferric chloride media. In: R.G. Bautista (Editor), Hydrometallurgical Process
Fundamentals. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y., pp. 77 - 112.
8 Pourbaix, M., 1966. Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions. Pergamon
Press, London, p. 393.
9 CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 54th Ed. CRC Press New York, N.Y., 1973-74.
10 Power, G.P. and Ritchie, I.M., 1981. Mixed potential measurements in the elucidation of
corrosion mechanisms - - 1. Introduction theory. Electrochim. Acta., 26: 1073.
11 Warren, G.W., Drouven, B. and Price, D.W., 1984. Relationships between the Pourbaix dia-
gram for Ag-S-H20 and electrochemical oxidation and reduction of Ag2S. Metal. Trans. 15B:
235-242.
12 Kobayashi, H., Noguchi, H., Maruyama, M. and Mitamuri, T., 1978. Studies on lead alloy
anodes in artificial sea water. II Anodic behaviour of silver electrode in sodium sulphate
aqueous solution. Boshoku Gijutsu 27 (1): 9-13. (Chem. Abstr. 91: 80867e.)
13 Mukha, S.I. and Ol'khovich, P.F., 1978. Chemical nature of products formed at electrodes
during the electrochemical dissolution of silver into water. Intensif. Protessov Obezzarazhi-
vaniya Vody: 54-63; 87-93. (Chem. Abstr. 93: 245150x.)
14 Dutrizac, J.E. and Jambor, J.L., 1984. Formation and characterization of argentojarosite and
plumbojarosite and their relevance to metallurgical processing. In: W.C. Park, D.M. Hausen
and R.D. Hagni (Editors), Applied Mineralogy. TMS-AIME, Warrendale, Pa.: 507-530.
15 Levich, V.G., 1962. Physicochemical Hydrodynamics. Prentice-Hall, Inglewood Cliffs, N.J.
16 Baticle, A.M., Perdu, E. and Vennereau, P., 1967. Ddtermination des coefficients de diffusion
des ions Fe '~+ et Fe 3+ en milieu H2SO4 M. C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) C264(1): 12-15.
17 MacDonald, D.D. and Owen, D., 1971. The dissolution of magnesium oxide in dilute sulphuric
acid. Can. J. Chem., 49: 3375-3380.
18 Gileadi, E., Kirow-Eisner, E. and Penciner, J., 1975. Interfacial Electrochemistry. An Ex-
perimental Approach. Addison-Wesley, Don Mills, Ont.
19 McAndrew, R.T., Wang, S.S. and Brown, W.R., 1975. Precipitation of iron compounds from
sulphuric acid leach solutions. CIM Bull. 68 (753): 101-110.
20 MacKinnon, D.J. and Brannen, J.M., 1984. The reaction of dissolved silver with various
sulphide minerals in sulphate and chloride media. Div. Rep. M R P / M S L 84-128 (TR); CAN-
MET, Energy, Mines and Resources Canada.
21 Beutier, D., Gabis, V., Ildefonse, J.P., Predali J.J. and Ricalens, F. 1987. Precipitation of
silver on natural and synthetic sulphides theory and prospects of industrial use. In: G.L.
Strathdee, M.O. Klein and L.A. Melis (Editors), Crystallization and Precipitation. Proc.
Int. Symp., Oct. 1987. Pergamon Press, Toronto, Ont., pp. 285-296.