Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
S. Nachimuthu
(RPAD)
Charge Memo
-----
THE REGISTRAR
Encl:
1) List of Witnesses
2)List of Documents
PERIYASAMY V
However due
to non-formation of the ring road and
approached roads to bridges. Both the
bridges are not in usage its lead to heavy
traffic conjunction inside the city.
The
authorities (Assistant divisional engineer )
Highway department specialized Tahsildar ,
land acquisition, surveyor and concerned
villager administrative officers had conduct
survey in all the 14 villages for proposed of
constructing ring road.
“8. The
3rd respondent in the counter affidavit took a
stand that the Technical Committee approved
the alignment and as per the procedure in
place, for new highways project, normally two
or three alignment has been taken for study
of various aspects such as length, built up
stretches, crossing of existing highways and
Railways, usage of Government land, existing
monuments & Temple, education institutions,
nsture of geography etc., by comparing merits
and demerits of the alignments, the technical
committee approved the best alignment with
very minimal damage to the properties of the
residents and minimum length so as to
minimize the project cost.”
“9. It is also
pointed out by the 3rd respondent that if the
alignment is proposed by the appellant/writ
petitioner is to be considered by crossing
location at existing State Highways at four
locations and ODR will also be shifted and
will affect the existing built-up stretches,
education institution and others which
means by avoiding a single well may lead to
damages numerous buildings. ”
File 1:
Sale deed 17.01.2014 Muthuraj to Manna
a) Page 3 missing.
b) Layout.
c) Sanction order by panchayat (approval) .
d) GPA deed dt 06.11.2000 Prl-c.Balakrishna/- Agent K.Iruappan.
e) Sale deed dt 02.08.2002 Irulappan to Arul.
f) Mortgage Discharge receipt dt 02.11.2012.
g) Sale deed dt 02.11.2012 – Arul to Marutharaj .
h) Details as to – how patta came to mutated in the name of
C.Balakrishnan.
i) Path No: 3172 dt 18.01.13 – proceedings of Tahsildar is also
necessary.
j) ‘A’ Register copy to
k) –E C for 33 years.
File 2:
Sale deed dt: 20.04.2016 by Meenakshi , Porpovai, Muthuraja to Manna
1) Sale deed dt 19.02.2016 in the name of Meenatchi.
2) Path No: 2069 and 3493 with mutation proceedings.
3) Sale ded dt 19.02.2016 in the name of porpavai.
4) Sale deed dt 22.08.1994 in the name of muthuraja .
5) FMB sketch and
6) Annexure ‘A’ to sale deed dt 20.04.16.
7) P.L.P – Mills pvt Ltd – details – whether company or proprietary
concern?
- Whether any resolution to sell the property for the present
vendors.
8) A Register
9) – Present path
10) – EC for 33 years.
File 3:
Sale deed dt 25.03.2015 by R M Palniappan to Manna
1) All title document listed in schedule ‘B’ of the above deed dt
25.03.2015.
2) ‘A’ Register.
3) FMB – Present
4) E.C for 33 years.
File 4:
Sale deed 17.01.2014 by K.Pappa in favour of Manna
1) Partition deed 1969 between C.Balakrishnan and his family
members.
2) Sale deed Doct No 152/1980 dt 28.02.1980.
3) Lay out plan with approval proceedings – clean copy.
4) 06.11.2000 – power deed C.Balakrishnan appointing Irulappan.
5) Sale deeds 02.08.2002 Doct No: 760, 763 and 766 of 2002.
6) Power deed in favour of Karmeegam given by
a. Mariappan.
b. Selvaraj
c. Karuppiah.
7) Sale deed dt 26.07.2012 by Karmegam (as POA) to Pappa.
8) ‘A’ Register.
9) Present FMB.
10) EC for 33 years.
written letter by school staff s.rajan on 22.11.2017 P.T. teacher attack art
Teacher.
written letter from shakela .kashe stated that at time of meeting question
was raised against drawing teacher why you using mobile phone in class
room . under education institution rules it wrong. Due to the conversation
he shouted against one lady teacher used her cast name . so conversation
become fight . so that only school management has inform this to police.