Sie sind auf Seite 1von 18

Recent Seismic Hazard Studies in SE Asia,

Pacific & USA

Mark Stirling, Nick Horspool , Matt Gerstenberger


& Phuong H. Nguyen
GNS Science
Introduction

• International seismic hazard technology transfer


projects conducted over the period 2013-14

• International technology transfer is a rapidly increasing


component of work at GNS Science

• Examples from Vietnam, Fiji, & California USA

GNS Science
Vietnam: preliminary seismic hazard map
• MFAT-funded development project with partners
Damwatch Engineering, Water Resources University,
and Institute of Geophysics

• Many countries still base hazard on historical seismicity


data (like NZ until the late 1990s)

GNS Science
Vietnam: Preliminary seismic hazard map
• Inclusion of modelled active faults increases seismic
hazard by a factor of 2

GNS Science
Fiji Z-Factor

Fiji Seismicity:
M>5.5 1960-
2009

GNS Science
Fiji Z-Factor

Seismicity rates M>5; 0.1*0.1deg 0-50km


GNS Science
Fiji Z-Factor

NZS 1170.5 Z-factor Map


GNS Science
Fiji Z-Factor

Suva Spectra vs Code Spectra


GNS Science
Diablo Canyon NPP: Ground truthing seismic
hazard estimates

GNS Science
Diablo Canyon: Coastal central California

GNS Science
Shoreline Report Hazard Curves

0.5g has a return period


of ~1100 years

1g has a return period


of ~20,000 years

GNS Science
Examples of FGFs and Semi FGFs

Unstable, ancient rock outcrops or balanced rocks that would be


shaken down if strong earthquake shaking occurred

Jim Brune pioneered the use of precariously-balanced rocks to


constrain seismic hazard estimates
GNS Science
Double Rock Site
Paleo seastacks on 80-
120ka marine benches

Franciscan chert

Semi FGFs formed along


steeply dipping chert layers

GNS Science
Double Rock East
Rough field estimate
of quasi-static toppling
acceleration

Tan25deg~0.5g

Semi FGF

25 o
Similar answer from
equally rough Newmark
analysis
GNS Science
NSHMP Hazard Curve: Double Rock Site

0.5g has a return period


of ~1-2000 years

GNS Science
Hazard Curve: Use FGFs to inform choice of
hazard level
0.01

Annual
Frequency of
Mean
exceedance
0.001 5th 16th 50th 84th 95th
(g) M5

0.0001
0.01 0.1 1.0 10
PGA (g)

GNS Science
Diablo Canyon

• Dating and assessment of FGF fragilities in progress

• FGFs only need to be a few thousand years of age to


constrain seismic hazard estimates for Diablo Canyon
NPP

• Diablo Canyon and Clyde Dam: first application of FGFs


to major seismic hazard projects

GNS Science
Acknowledgements

• Graeme McVerry, GNS Science


• Andrew King, GNS Science
• Stuart Read, GNS Science
• Damwatch Engineering colleagues
• Norm Abrahamson, PG&E
• Steven Thompson, WLA
• Tom Hanks, USGS
• Richard Lester, MWH

GNS Science

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen