Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

Romero vs.

Court of Appeals obligation to eject the squatters from the subject property"
and that Romero (P), being the injured party, was the
Summary: A seller of a property invokes the right to party who could, under Article 1191 of the Civil Code,
rescind the contract citing as a ground her own failure to rescind the agreement. The court further ruled that the
comply with a condition in the agreement to eject the provision calling for the reimbursement of the down
squatters occupying the property. payment amounted to a "penalty clause".

Rule of Law: Under the law on contracts, the power to But the decision was reversed on appeal where the court
rescind is given to the injured party. decided that the agreement was a contract with a
resolutory condition.
Facts: Buyer Virgilio Romero (P) together with his foreign
partners decided to put up a central warehouse in Metro Issues: May the vendor demand the rescission of a
Manila. They contacted several real estate brokers and contract for the sale of a parcel of land for a cause
thereafter, were contacted by Alfonso Flores and spouse to traceable to his/her own failure?
offer a parcel of land of the seller Enriqueta Ongsiong (D).
Romero (P) found the property suitable for a warehouse, Ruling: No. Ongsiong's (D) action for rescission is not
except for the presence of squatters in the area. warranted because she is not the injured party. The right
of resolution of a party to an obligation under Article 1191
A Deed of Conditional Sale was executed between Romero of the Civil Code is predicated on a breach of faith by the
(P) and Ongsiong (D) where they agreed that the seller has other party that violates the reciprocity between them. It is
the obligation to remove the squatters from the property. Ongsiong (D) who has failed in her obligation under the
While Ongsiong (D) got a favorable judgment on her contract.
eviction case against the squatters, she did so at a much A perfected contract of sale may either be absolute or
later date than the agreed upon 60-day period in the conditional depending on whether the agreement is devoid
contract. She offered to return the down payment to of, or subject to, any condition imposed on the passing of
Romero (P), but he refused to accept and instead offer to title of the thing to be conveyed or on the obligation of a
underwrite the expenses for the execution of the writ. party thereto. When ownership is retained until the
fulfillment of a positive condition the breach of the
On the expiry of the grace period, Romero (P) reminded condition will simply prevent the duty to convey title from
Onsiong (D) of her obligation to which Ongsiong (D) acquiring an obligatory force. If the condition is imposed
responded that the Deed of Conditional Sale had been on an obligation of a party which is not complied with, the
rendered null and void by virtue of her failure to evict the other party may either refuse to proceed or waive said
squatters from the premises. condition (Article 1545, Civil Code). Where, of course, the
condition is imposed upon the perfection of the contract
Romero (P) responded that the contract of sale between itself, the failure of such condition would prevent the
the parties was perfected from the very moment that there juridical relation itself from coming into existence.
was a meeting of the minds upon the subject lot and the —Asuncion vs. Court of Appeals, 238 SCRA 602.
price. The contract had already been partially fulfilled and
executed upon receipt of the down payment. Ongsiong (D) In determining the real character of the contract, the title
is precluded from rejecting its binding effects relying upon given to it by the parties is not as much significant as its
her inability to eject the squatters from the premises of substance. For example, a deed of sale, although
subject property during the agreed period. Furthermore, denominated as a deed of conditional sale, may be treated
the provisions in the contract do not grant Ongsiong (D) as absolute in nature, if title to the property sold is not
the option or prerogative to rescind and retain the reserved in the vendor or if the vendor is not granted the
property should she fail to comply with the obligation she right to unilaterally rescind the contract predicated on the
has assumed under the contract. The contract clearly fulfillment or non-fulfillment, as the case may be, of the
shows that the right to rescind and to demand the prescribed condition.
return/reimbursement of the down payment is granted to —Dignos v. Court of Appeals, GR L-59266, February 29,
Romero (P) for his protection. 1988, 158 SCRA 375.

Instead of availing of the power to rescind the contract and


demand the return of the down payment, Romero (P) had The term "condition" in a perfected contract of sale
opted to assume the ejectment of the squatters from the pertains to the compliance to a prestation by one party and
premises. And he pointed out that it is basic under the law upon fulfillment, the demand of the reciprocal prestation
on contracts that the power to rescind is given to the by the other party. The reciprocal obligations referred to
injured party. would normally be, in the case of Romero (P), the payment
of the agreed purchase price and, in the case of the
Finally, Romero (P) told Ongsiong (D) that she has not Ongsiong (D), the fulfillment of certain express warranties
complied with her obligation under their contract in good (which, in this case, is the timely eviction of the squatters
faith. It is undeniable that she deliberately refused to exert on the property).
efforts to eject the squatters and retain the property
because of the sudden increase in the value of properties in It is futile to challenge the agreement here as not being a
the surrounding areas. duly perfected contract. A sale is at once perfected when a
person (the seller) obligates himself, for a price certain, to
The lower court held that Ongsiong (D) had no right to deliver and to transfer ownership of a specified thing or
rescind the contract since it was she who "violated her right to another (the buyer) over which the latter agrees.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen