Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(b) protecting in the receiving State the interests of the sending State and of its
nationals, within the limits permitted by international law;
(d) ascertaining by all lawful means conditions and developments in the receiving
State, and reporting thereon to the Government of the sending State; [and]
(e) promoting friendly relations between the sending State and the receiving State,
and developing their economic, cultural, and scientific realtions.
1
This provision embodies the traditional functions under customary international law,
namely, representation, protection, negotiation, and observation. The additional
function in item (e) above is derived from the recommendation of the Philippines,
Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia.
Two additional functions of the mission are added by Articles 45 and 46 of the
Diplomatic Convention, Namely:
2. it may protect the interest of a third State by agreement with the receiving State,
if there is no diplomatic relations between the third State and the receiving
State.
Note that under Article 2(2) of the Consular Convention, “The consent given to the
establishment of diplomatic relations between two States implies, unless otherwise
stated, consent to the establishment of consular relations.” Also, under Article 3 of the
Consular Convention consular functions are exercised by diplomatic missions. Article 70
of the Consular Convention regulates the exercise of consular functions by a diplomatic
mission.
The rule in paragraph 2. Article 3 of the Diplomatic Convention referred to above, does
not in any way impose a duty on the mission to perform consular functions.
Q. Give some rules governing the exercise of consular functions by a diplomatic mission.
A. They are, inter alia:
1. members of the diplomatic mission exercising consular functions shall continue
to
Be governed by the Diplomatic Convention as to privileges and immunities, not
by the Consular Convention (cc 70.4);
2. the exercise of consular functions by members of the diplomatic mission shall be
in accordance with the consular Convention rather than the Diplomatic
Convention (cc 3 and 70.1);
2
3. the names of members of the diplomatic mission performing consular functions
shall be notified to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the receiving State (cc 70.2);
4. the diplomatic mission may primary address or deal with the local authorities of
the receiving State. If allowed by the laws of the receiving State or by
international
Agreement, it may also deal with the central authorities of that State (cc 70.3).
Q. In the performance of its functions, what duties does a diplomatic mission owe to the
receiving State?
A. Among the duties of a diplomatic mission are:
1. the duty “to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving State (DC 41.1);
2. the duty “not to interfere in the internal affairs of that State”(DC 41.1).
Q. What is an agrément?
A. agrément is an approval given by the receiving State to the person who the sending
State proposes to be accredited as chief of its diplomatic mission (DC 4.1).
This is an exception to the general rule in Article 7 of the Diplomatic Convention that
“the sending State may freely appoint the members of the staff of the mission”.
3
However, in Article 7 the Diplomatic Convention requires approval of the names of the
military, naval or air attaché by the receiving State.
The requirement of agrément is justified by the need for a head of mission to effectively
conduct diplomatic relations between the sending State and the receiving State.
Q. If the receiving State refuses agrément, is it obliged to give reason therefor?
A. No. The Diplomatic Convention provides in paragraph 2. Article 4 that it is not obliged to
do so. This rule is intended to avoid possible conflict that a reason for refusal may
create.
It may be observed that by such time he has already begun to enjoy his diplomatic
privileges and immunities. Paragraph 1, Article 39 of the Diplomatic Convention says
that he shall enjoy them “from the moment he enters the territory of the receiving
State.”
It is requires that the sending State give notification to the receiving State as to the
double or multiple accreditation (DC 5.1).
This requirement, however, does not constitute a duty on the part of the sending States
to ask the permission of the receiving State.
In case of double or multiple accreditation, a diplomatic mission in the State where the
head of mission does not have his permanent seat may be headed by a change
d’affaires interim (DC 5.2).
At one time, Belgium had one head of mission represented inn more than 69 States, and
a U.S. ambassador in six other States. At present, the Philippine ambassador in Nairobi,
Kenya is also accredited to 13 other East African States.
Q. May the same person be accredited as the head of mission by two or more States to
other State?
A. Yes, if the receiving State does not object (DC 6). This arrangement may be convenient to
new States or those with limited financial resources.
4
Q. May a State’s head of mission act as its representative to any international
organization?
A. Yes, as allowed by Paragraph 2, Article 5 of the Diplomatic Convention.
Note that this rule does not speak of notification to or objection from the receiving
State.
Q. May the members of the diplomatic mission be nationals of the receiving State or of a
third State?
A. It is permissible under customary international law that a member of the diplomatic
mission may be a national of the receiving State. Paragraph 1, Article 8 of the Diplomatic
Convention provides, thus: “Members of the diplomatic staff of the mission should in
principle be if the nationality of the sending State”. However, paragraph 2, Article 8 of
that Convention requires consent of the receiving State as a pre-requisite to the
appointment of its nationals. The consent may be withdrawn any time. It is left to the
internal law of States to provide for express prohibition on their nationals against
service in the diplomatic mission of the other States.
Q. Under what conditions may a receiving State declare persona non grata the head of
diplomatic mission or any member of the staff of the sending State’s diplomatic
mission?
A. The receiving State may exercise this right at any time. It has no obligation to explain its
decision. It may do so before the arrival of the diplomatic agent in question in its
territory (DC 9.1).
If it falls to comply with this duty within a reasonable time, the receiving State “may
refuse to recognize the person concerned as a member of the mission” (DC 9.2).
5
A. It, may be determined by agreement between the sending State and the receiving State.
In the absence of specific agreement, paragraph 1, Article 11 of the Diplomatic
Convention authorizes the receiving State to “require that the size of a mission be kept
within limits considered by it to be reasonable and normal having regard to
circumstances and conditions in the receiving State and to the needs of the particular
mission.”
The agreement becomes the method to achieve the balance of interest between the
two States. Note, however that absent an agreement, it is the receiving State that
determines what is “reasonable and normal” size of the mission, thus introducing a
subjective test.
Q. May the receiving State refuse to accept officials of a particular category from the
sending State?
A. Yes, Paragraph 2, Article 11 of the Diplomatic Convention provides that “the receiving
State may equally, within similar bounds and on a non-discriminatory basis, refuse to
accept officials of a particular category.”
The standard “within similar bounds” apparently refers to that spelled out in paragraph
1 of Article 11, which is treated in 3.19 above.
Q. At what point may a head of mission be said to have the commenced his official
functions in the receiving State?
A. It is either on the date of the presentation of credentials, or on the date of notification
of arrival, “in accordance with the practice prevailing in the receiving State” (DC 13.1).
Which rule to apply is thus to the receiving State, provided the rule of practice chosen
must be “applied in uniform manner” (DC 13.1).
6
(3) Chargés d’affaires accredited to ministers of Foreign Affairs (DC 14.1).
Q. How is the doyen (dean) of the diplomatic corp chosen and what are his functions?
A. As established by practice, the head of mission who enjoys seniority on account of date
of arrival becomes the doyen of the diplomatic corp. Some states have accepted the
practice of regarding the representative of the Holy See automatically as the doyen.
The Diplomatic Convention does not define the function of the doyen of the diplomatic
corps. By the tradition he acts as spokesman of the diplomatic corps on matters of
common concern to his diplomatic colleagues. Based on informal consultation with
them he may speak on behalf of the diplomatic corps. The receiving state may
communicate and consult that body through the doyen
It is required that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the receiving State be informed of
the name of the chargé d’affaires ad interim by either the head of mission or, in case he
is unable to do so, by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the sending State (DC 19.1).
This rule leaves to the sending State to decide that its head of mission is “unable to
perform functions.”
Paragraph 2, Article 19 of the Diplomatic Convention allows the sending State, where no
member of the diplomatic staff of the mission is present or available, to designate “a
member of the administrative and technical staff,” provided that he takes charge of the
“current administrative affairs of the mission.” He is not entitled to represent the
sending State or perform diplomatic functions. His privileges and immunities remain to
be pertaining to those of the administrative and technical staff. Such designation may be
made only with the consent of the receiving State.
Q. Is the use of the flag and emblem of the sending State a matter of right in the territory
of the receiving State?
A. Yes, but as provided by Article 20 of the Diplomatic Convention, thus: “The mission and
its head shall have the right to use the flag and emblem of the sending State on the
7
premises of the mission, including the residence of the head of mission, and on his
means of transport.” The right does not extend to public transport used by the head of
mission.
In preparing the draft articles of the said Convention, the International Law Commission
(ILC) made reference to the following formulation:
(2) There is now a third theory which appears to be gaining ground in modern
times, namely, the “functional necessity” theory which justifies privileges and
immunities as being necessary to enable the [diplomatic] mission to perform its
actions.
(3) The ILC was guided by this third theory in solving problems on which practice
gave no clear pointers, while also bearing in mind the representative character
of the head of the mission and of the mission itself (ILC Yearbook, 1958, vol. II pp.
94-5).
Thus, the three main theories in the basis of diplomatic privileges and immunities are
extra-territoriality theory, representational theory, and the functional necessity theory.
Q. Is the functional necessity theory the only justification for diplomatic privileges and
immunities?
8
A. Although the theory of functional necessity appears to be the main purpose or
justification, note that the preambular paragraph quoted earlier in 3.28 above speaks of
“diplomatic missions as representing States” (emphasis added). This is the result of an
amendment to the draft article intended to reflect the representational theory.
Q. Explain the fundamental rule that “the premises of the mission shall be inviolable.”
A. Inviolability consist of two elements:
1. The duty of the receiving State to refrain from entering the premises, except
with the consent of the head of mission (DC 22.1); and
2. The “special duty” of the receiving State to protect the premises “against any
intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of peace of the mission
or impairment of its dignity” (DC 22.2).
These are the most important privileges of the diplomatic mission in ensuring the
performance of its functions without interference or restraint.
The first element pointed out above means that the agents of the receiving State “may
not enter… [the premises], except with the consent of the head of mission” ( DC 22.1).
Hence no legal writ may be served within the premises and no sheriff or server of the
legal process may be allowed to deliver a summons.
Paragraph 3, Article 22 of the Diplomatic Convention adds that “the premises of the
mission, their furnishings and other property thereon and the means of transport of the
mission shall be immune from search, requisition, attachment or execution.”
The inviolability rule continues to apply even “if diplomatic relations are broken off, or if
a mission is permanently or temporarily recalled.” In that case, “the receiving State
must… respect and protect the premises of the mission, together with its property and
archives.” This holds true even in times of armed conflict (DC 45(a)).
Inviolability extends to the archives and documents of the mission “at any time and
wherever they may be” (DC 24).
It also covers all official correspondence relating to the diplomatic mission and its
function (DC 27.2).
9
premises of the mission,” to complement paragraph 1, Article 22 in relation to Article
1(i) of the Diplomatic Convention, as discussed above. Inviolability covers his papers and
correspondence, and property of not private, professional and commercial nature as
provided in paragraph 3 Article 31 of the said Convention (DC 30.2).
The mission need not to be the owner of the premises. As pointed out by the ILC in its
1958 draft provision on inviolability,
The expression “premises of the mission” includes the buildings for the purpose
of the mission, whether they are owned by the sending State or by the sending
State or by a third party acting for its account or are leased or rented. The
premises comprise, if they consist of a building, the surrounding and other
appurtenances, including the garden and the park (ILC Yearbook, vol. II p. 95,
1958).
With prior consent of the receiving State, office forming part of the mission may be
established in “localities other than those in which the mission itself is established” ( DC
12). There are all covered by the inviolability rule.
The person of a diplomatic agent shall be inviolable. He shall not be liable to any
form of arrest or detention. The receiving State shall treat him with due respect
and shall take all appropriate steps to prevent any attack on his person,
freedom, or dignity.
10
In its commentary on the relevant draft article, the ILC observes: “Being inviolable, the
diplomatic agent is exempt from certain measure would amount to direct coercion. This
principle does not exclude either self-defence or, in exceptional circumstances,
measures to prevent the diplomatic agent from committing crimes or offences” (ILC
Yearbook, 1957, vol. I, pp. 209-210; 1958, vol ii, p. 97).
Personal inviolability consist of two aspects: the duty of the receiving State to refrain
from exercising its sovereign rights, and the duty to treat him with due respect and
protect his person, freedom or dignity from physical interference by others.
In the Hostage Case, the International Court of the Justice has clarified that compliance
with Article 29 on the Diplomatic Convention does not mean “that a diplomatic agent
caught in the act of committing an assault or other offense may not, on occasion, be
briefly arrested by the police of the receiving State in order to prevent the commission
of the particular crime’ (Case Concerning the United State Diplomatic and Consular Staff
in Tehran, ICJ Reports, 1980, para. 86).
1. His private residence which “shall enjoy the same inviolability and protection
as the premises of the mission” (DC 30.1);
The private residence of the head of mission could be an apartment, a room in a hotel,
or a house. Note the commentary of the ILC:
Because this inviolability arises from that attaching to the person of the
diplomatic agent, the expression “private residence of a diplomatic agent” (in
Article 30 of the Diplomatic Convention) necessarily includes even a temporary
residence of the diplomatic agent (ILC Yearbook, 1958, vol. I p. 144; 1958, vol II,
p. 98).
11
Q. What is the rule on immunity from jurisdiction on the part of the diplomatic agent?
A. As provided in paragraph 1, Article 31 of the Diplomatic Convention, the rule states:
A diplomatic agent shall enjoy immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of the
receiving State. He shall enjoy immunity from its civil and administrative
jurisdiction…
Immunity from jurisdiction is not exemption form the application of substantive laws of
the receiving State, but exception from judicial jurisdiction. Immunity from civil and
administrative jurisdiction covers direct claims against the diplomatic agent himself or
on his property and covers family and martial matters.
12
As to exceptions to immunity, Article 31(b) of the Diplomatic Convention deals with
private property which the diplomatic agent owns in his personal capacity. It is
restricted to actions in rem where title or possession is in issue in regard to immovable
property.
With respect to Article 31 (a) on succession, note the distinction implied as to the status
by which the diplomatic agent is engaged in succession: he may either be involved as a
private person or in his official capacity “on behalf of the sending State.” The exception
applies only if he is involved “as a private person and not on behalf of the sending
State.” In his official capacity he may act on behalf of the sending State as illustrated in
the case of the Philippines where a “testamentary disposition …[is[ made to the State,
provinces, [or] municipal corporations” under Article 1026 of the Civil Code, or in
intestate succession under Article 1011 of the Civil Code where by reason of “default of
persons entitled to succeed … [t]he State shall inherit the whole estate.” In such cases
of official representation, immunity applies.
Article 31 (c) of the Diplomatic Convention should be read together with Article 42 of
this Convention which provides: “A diplomatic agent shall not in the receiving State
practice for personal profit any professional or commercial activity.” A commentator
has observed: “This last exception is probably redundant since Article 42 forbids the
diplomatic agent from engaging in such activities” (Philipe Cahier, “Vienna Convention
on Diplomatic Relations,” international Conciliation, January 1969, No. 571, p.29).
However, Article 31 (c) may still have room for application where a professional activity
may not be practiced “for personal profit”, which is outside the Article 42 prohibition.
Also, in case the diplomatic agent undertakes a professional or commercial activity in
brach of Article 42, Article 31 (c) may be availed of as remedy against him.
A. In addition to the diplomatic agent, the following persons shall also enjoy immunity
from jurisdiction:
1. members of the family of the diplomatic agent forming part of his household,
who are not nationals of the receiving State (DC 37.1);
13
3. members of the service staff of the diplomatic mission, who are not nationals of
or permanent residents in the receiving State, with respect to “acts performed in
the course of their duties” (DC 37.3).
A. Yes. It is required, however, that the waiver be made by the sending State itself and
that it must be express (DC 32.1 AND 32.2).
This rule applies to all proceedings; it makes no distinction between criminal jurisdiction
and civil or administrative proceedings. How the authority of the sending State to make
such a waiver is to be expressed formally may be provided by internal law of that State.
The question of authority may become a problem of evidence in the court of the
receiving State. State practice indicates that the authority to exercise the waiver is
through appropriate sovereign organs and not by the diplomatic agent or official
himself.
The sending State, however, may allow or authorize him in specified matters to give
evidence as a witness, especially in a case not related to his official functions and in the
interest of justice.
This is subject to exception in cases listed in paragraph 1 of the said provision, as dealt
within 3.37 and 3.38b above. Further, it is subject to the proviso that “the measures
concerned can be taken without infringing the inviolability of the person and residence
of the diplomatic agent” (DC 31.3).
Immunity from execution is derived from the principles of inviolability and of immunity
discussed earlier.
Note that, as set out in paragraph 4, Article 32 of the Diplomatic Convention, waiver of
jurisdiction in civil and administrative proceedings “shall not be held to imply waiver of
14
immunity in respect of the execution of the judgment, for which a separate waiver shall
be necessary.”
Q. What is the rule on freedom of movement on the part of the members of the
diplomatic mission?
A. The rule consists of the duty of the receiving State to “ensure to all members of the
mission freedom of movement and travel in its territory”, but subject to the laws of the
receiving State “concerning zones entry into which is prohibited or regulated for reason
of national security” (DC 26). As the ILC notes, the creation of such zones “must not, on
the other hand, be so extensive as to render freedom of movement and travel illusory”
(ILC Yearbook, 1958, vol II, p.96).
Q. How does modern diplomatic law provide for freedom of communication on the part
of the diplomatic mission?
A. It provides that:
1. “the receiving State shall permit and protect free communication on the part of
the mission for all official purposes” (DC 27.1);
2. “in communication with the Government and the other missions and consulates
of the sending State, wherever situated, the mission may employ all appropriate
means, including diplomatic couriers and messages in code or cipher. … [and]
may install and use a wireless transmitter only with the consent of the receiving
State” (DC 27.1);
3. “the official correspondence of the mission shall be inviolable “ (DC 27.2); and
Q. What is the nature and scope of exemption from taxation in diplomatic law?
A. Exemption from taxation by the receiving State pertains to the sending State and to the
diplomatic agent.
15
1. As to the sending State, exemption applies to “the premises of the mission,”
whether owned or leased, with respect to “all national, regional or municipal
dues and taxes” (DC 23.1).
2. As to the diplomatic agent, exemption covers “all dues and taxes, personal or
real, national, regional or municipal, excluding those spelled out in 3,47 below
(DC 34).
Generally, a diplomatic agent is exempt from tax on income in the receiving State arising
from the discharge of his official functions and on private income from sources outside
of the receiving State.
1. as to the receiving State, exemption does not include dues or taxes which
“represent payment for specific services rendered” (DC 23.1). This should refer
to charges for services or goods which are of direct benefit to the diplomatic
mission and the value of the charges is related to the cost of such series or
goods;
(a) indirect taxes of a kind which are normally incorporated in the price of goods
or services;
(b) dues and taxes on private immovable property situated in the territory of the
receiving State, which he does not hold on behalf of the sending State for
purposes of the mission;
(c) estate, succession or inheritance duties levied by the receiving State, other
than those imposed on movable property “the presence of which in the
receiving State was due solely by the presence of the deceased as a member
of the mission or as a member of the family of a member of the mission”. (DC
34(c) and 39.4);
(d) dues and taxes on private income having its source in the receiving State (DC
34(d));
16
(e) capital taxes on investments made in commercial undertakings in the
receiving State (DC 34 (d));
(g) registration, court or record fees, mortgages dues and stamp duty, with
respect to immovable property (DC 34 (f)).
Q. Who are entitled to exemption from taxation in addition to the diplomatic agent?
A. They are:
1. members of his family forming part of the household, if they are not
nationals of the receiving State (DC 37.1);
2. members of the administrative and technical staff of the mission,
including members of their families forming part of the household, if they
are not nationals or permanent residents of the receiving State (DC 37.2);
3. members of the service staff of the mission, if they are not nationals and
permanent residents of the receiving State, with respect to “emoluments
they receive by reason of their employment” (DC 37.3); and
1. exemption from personal services and all other public service “of any kind
whatsoever,” including military obligations such as those connected with
requisitioning, military contributions, and billeting (DC 35);
2. exemption from social security provisions with respect to services rendered for
the sending State, if enforced in the receiving State (DC 33.1); and
3. exemption under the laws of the receiving State “from all customs duties, taxes,
and related charges with respect to articles for official use of the mission and for
the personal use of the diplomatic agent or members of his family forming part
of the household, except charges for storage cartage and similar services (DC
36).
17
Q. When do diplomatic privileges and immunities commence?
A. A person entitled to privileges and immunities shall commence to enjoy them “from the
moment he enters the territory of the receiving State… to take up his post.” If already in
such territory he shall enjoy them “from the moment when his appointment is notified
to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,” or any other ministry as may be agreed 9DC 39.1).
1. on notification by the sending State to the receiving State that, his function
ended (DC 43, 10.1(a)) ; or
2. on notification by the receiving State to the sending State that, following his
being declared persona non grata, it refuses to recognize him as a member of
the mission (DC 43).
3. death of the diplomatic agent (ILC Yearbook, vol. I p. 181, 1958); and
18
Customary international law allows such an appointment. However, the national law of
the receiving State may prohibit its nationals to accept appointment as diplomatic agent
of another State.
Q. How does the nationality law of the receiving State affect the members of the
diplomatic mission?
A. Members of the diplomatic mission and members of their families forming part of their
household, who are not nationals of the receiving State, do not require the nationality
of that State solely by operation of its law (Optional Protocol to the Diplomatic
Convention Concerning Acquisition of Nationality, Article II).
This means that –
1. a child born of a members of a diplomatic mission regardless of the rank and
are not nationals of the receiving State, does not automatically acquire the
nationality of State by reason of birth within its territory, and
2. a woman member of the mission does not acquire solely by marriage to the
national of the receiving State her husband’s nationality.
This rule, however, acquires binding force only with respect to States which are parties
to the Optional Protocol Concerning Acquisition of Nationality which entered into force
on 24 April 1964. The Philippines ratified the Protocol on 15 November 1965.
That diplomatic agents are not subject to the receiving State’s law on acquisition of
nationality is a matter of customary international law. Although the
ILC draft convention carried this customary rule, it was finally consigned to a provision
in the Optional Protocol, as pointed out above, on account of the apprehension that its
application, if a made part of the Diplomatic Convention, may come into conflict with
the national law of some State Parties to the said Convention.
19
CONSULAR LAW
This rule provides room for States to exclude consular relations intentionally when they
establish diplomatic relations. It may happen on the other hand , that consular relations
may be established ahead of or as a preliminary step to diplomatic relations.
As a consequence of the rule quoted above, “if one of the States between which
diplomatic relations exist decide to establish a consular … [post] in the territory of the
other State, the former State has no need to conclude an agreement for the
establishment of consular relations, provided in article 2, paragraph 1 [of the Consular
Convention], but solely an agreement respecting the establishment of the consular …
[post] as provided in paragraph 1, Article 4 which states: “A consular post may be
established in the territory of the receiving State only with that State’s consent” (ILC
Yearbook, 1961, vol. II, p. 94)
20
Q. Does this mean that consular relations may be undertaken by the diplomatic post?
A. Yes. Consular relations may be conducted by the diplomatic mission, not necessarily by
the consular post. The rule is set out in article 3 of the Consular Convention: “Consular
functions are exercised by consular posts. They are also exercised by diplomatic
missions …”
The following ILC commentary is instructive: “If the sending State has no consulates in
the receiving State the competence of the diplomatic mission in consular affairs covers
automatically the entire territory of the receiving State. If the sending State has
consulates in the territory in question, the exercise of consular functions by the
diplomatic mission is limited as a general rule to that part of the territory of the
receiving State which is outside the consular district or districts allotted to the
consulates of the sending State … But even in such cases the sending State may reserve
certain consular activities to its diplomatic mission …[such as] the issue of visas on
diplomatic passports….” (ILC Yearbook, 1961, vol. II, p. 94).
A consular district is a geographic area assigned or defined by the sending State for the
exercise of consular functions to its consular post, with approval of the receiving State
(cc 1.1 (b) and 4.2). It sets the territorial limits for the exercise of consular functions, in
agreement with the receiving State. It is only in special circumstances and with the
consent of the receiving State that a consular officer may exercise functions outside his
consular district (cc 6).
Q. How many consular posts may the sending State establish in the territory of the
receiving State?
A. Such number as may be permitted by the receiving State. The Consular Convention
provides: “A consular post may be established in the territory of the receiving State only
with that State’s consent” (cc 4.1).
The following are subject to the approval of the receiving State: the seat of the consular
post, its subsequent changes, and classification; the consular district; and the opening of
a vice-consulate or consular agency in a locality other than in which it is situated, or any
office forming part of the existing consular post outside of its seat (cc 4.2-4.5).
(1) protecting the interests of the sending State in the territory of the receiving
State;
(4) ascertaining by all lawful means the conditions and developments in the
commercial, economic, cultural and scientific life of the receiving State, reporting
thereon to the government of the sending State, and giving information to
persons interested;
(5) issuing passports and travel documents to nationals of the sending State and
visas and travel documents to persons wishing to travel to the sending State;
(6) acting as notary, civil registrar and similar administrative capacities; and
(7) exercising rights of supervision and inspection pertaining to the sending State as
flag state and state of registry of aircraft (cc5).
Q. May the consul or consular post represent a national of the sending State before the
tribunal and other authorities of the receiving State?
A. Yes, under certain conditions. The Consular Convention provides that this is permissible
“for the purpose of obtaining … provisional measures for the preservation of the rights
and interest of the national in question, where, because of absence or any other reason,
… [he] is unable at the proper time to assume the defense of … [his] rights and
22
interests.” Moreover, this right of representation must be exercised in accordance with
the laws and regulations of the receiving State” (cc 5(i)). The ILC observes: “In no case,
however, does this provision empower the consul to dispose of the rights of the person
he is representing. Furthermore, the consul’s right of representation is limited in time;
it ceases as soon as the person concerned himself assumes the defense of his rights or
appoints an attorney (ILC Yearbook, 1961, vol. II, p. 97).
This right should be correlated with consular rights under Article 36 of the Consular
Convention, as dealt with below in 3.65.
Q. What rights may be availed of in case a national of the sending State is under arrest or
in prison, custody or detention in the receiving State?
A. (1) The consular officer has the right to communicate and to have the sae, access to the
national in question (cc36.1 (a)).
This is complemented by the right of such national to “have the same freedom with
respect to communication and access to consular officers of the sending State” (cc
36.1(a)).
(2) There arise the duty on the part of the receiving State upon the request of a national
in question, to inform the consular post of the sending State “if, within its consular
district, a national of that State is arrested or committed to prison or to custody pending
trial or is detained in any other manner” (cc 36.1(b)).
The receiving State has also the duty to forward without delay to the consular post
communication addressed to it by the national in question.
(b) to have his communication addressed to the consular post forwarded by the
receiving State accordingly (cc 36.1(b)); and
(a) to be informed by the receiving State without delay, of the condition of the
national in question as to his arrest, imprisonment, custody or detention,
pursuant to his request addressed to the authorities of the receiving State;
(c) to visit the national in question as well as “to converse and correspond with him
and arrange for his legal representation” (cc 36.1 (c)).
These rights are subject to the condition that they “shall be in conformity with the laws
and regulations of the receiving State.” However, the application of such laws and
regulations may be challenged in that they are unable to give “full effect … to the
purposes for which the rights … are intended” (cc 36.2). This means that such laws
cannot have the effect of nullifying these rights.
Q. Has the International Court of Justice (ICJ) made a pronouncement with respect to the
rights provided in Article 36 of the Consular Convention discussed in 3.65 above?
A. Yes. In the LaGrand Case (Germany v. united States), the ICJ explains that –
The ICJ goes on to interpret Article 36, paragraph 2 of the Consular Convention. This
provision reads:
The rights referred to in paragraph 2 of this article shall be exercised in
conformity with the laws of the receiving State, subject to the proviso, however,
25
that the said laws and regulations must enable full effect to be given to the
purposes for which the rights accorded under this article are intended.
Applying this provision, the ICJ declares that if-
. . . cannot accept the argument of the United States which proceeds, in part, on
the assumption that paragraph 2 of Article 36 applies only to the rights of the
sending States and not also to those of the detained individual. The court has
already determined that Article 36, paragraph 1, creates individual rights for the
detained person in addition to the rights accorded the sending States, and that
consequently the reference to “rights” in paragraph 2 must be read as applying
not only to the rights of the sending States, but also to the rights of the
detained individual . . . (para. 89).
Q. How is the head of consular post appointed and admitted to the exercise of consular
functions?
A. He is appointed by the sending State and admitted to the exercise of consular functions
by the receiving State (CC 10.1)
Q. What is an exequatur?
A. Exequatur is an authorization from receiving State by which the head of a consular post
is admitted to the exercise of consular functions (CC 12.1).
He is not allowed to enter upon his consular functions until he has received an
exequatur (CC 12.3), except in the following instances;
26
(2) an acting head of the consular post may act provisionally as head of the post
without the exequatur , if the latter is unable to carry out his functions or in case
of vacancy in the position of head of the consular post (CC 15.1).
The exequatur refers to the act of the receiving State as well as to the document
conferring the right right to exercise consular functions.
The ILC observes that exequaturs may be granted in the following forms:
(a) a decree by the head of State, signed by him and countersigned by the minister
for foreign affairs, the original being issued to the head of consular post;
(b) a decree signed as above, but only a copy of which, certified by the minister for
foreign affairs, is issued to the head of consular post;
(c) a transcription endorsed on the consular commission, a method which may have
several variants; and
(d) a notification to the sending State through the diplomatic channel (ILC Yearbook,
1964, vol. II, p. 101).
The ILC also notes: “The grant of the exequatur to a consul as head of a consular post
covers ipso jure the members of the consular staff working under his orders and
responsibility. It is therefore no necessary for the consular officials who are not heads of
post to present consular commissions and obtain an exequatur” (ILC Yearbook, 1961,
vol. II, p. 101). However, the Consular Convention provides; “The receiving State may, if
required by its laws and regulations, grant an exequatur to a consular officer other than
the head of a consular post” (CC 19.4)
Under the same condition, the sending State may make a request to the same effect (CC
19.3).
(2) ensure that necessary measures are taken to enable the head of consular post to
carry out the duties of his office and to enjoy the benefits of the provisions of
the Consular Convention.
Q. May an acting head exercise the functions of the head of a consular post?
A. Yes, in cases provided in paragraph 1, Article 15 of the Consular Convention, thus: “If the
head of a consular post is unable to carry out his functions or the position of head of
consular post is vacant, an acting head of post may act provisionally as head of the
consular post.”
[1] The function of acting head of post in the consular service corresponds to
that of chargé d’affaires ad interim in the diplomatic service.
[2]. . . The text leaves States quite free to decide the method of designating the
acting head of post, who may be chosen from among the officials of the
particular consulate or of another consulate of the sending State, or from among
the officials of a diplomatic mission of that State. Where no consular official is
available to take charge, one of the consular employees may be chosen as acting
head of post . . .
[3] The word “provisionally” emphasizes that the function of acting head of post
may not, except by agreement between the States concerned, be prolonged for
so long a period that the acting head would in fact become permanent head (ILC
Yearbook, 1961, vol. II, p. 103).
Q. If a member of the diplomatic staff is designated as acting head of the consular post,
does he continue to enjoy diplomatic privileges and immunities?
A. Yes, if the receiving State does not object (CC 15.4). The designation does not affect his
diplomatic status.
28
The performance of diplomatic acts does not affect the legal status of the consular
officer and does not confer upon him any right to diplomatic privileges and immunities ( CC
17.1).
Q. May two more States appoint the same person as a consular officer in the receiving
State?
A. Ye. It is required, however, that this be with of two or more States at the same time.
There are two or more sending States, but only one receiving State.
Career consuls have precedence over honorary consuls. Honorary consular officers who
are heads of consular posts shall rank in each class after career heads of consular posts,
in the same order and according to the rules set out above (CC 16.5).
Q. May a person who is a national of the receiving State be appointed as consular officer
of the sending State?
A. This may be done only with the express consent of the receiving State, which may be
withdrawn anytime (CC 22.2).
Although, in principle, consular officers should have the nationality of the sending State,
the Consular Convention expressly allows otherwise, including the appointment as
consular officer of nationals of a third State who are not nationals of the sending State
(CC 22.1-22.3).
29
Q. May the receiving State declare a consular officer persona non grata or not
acceptable?
A. Yes. To this effect, the receiving State may notify the sending State at any time (CC 23.1).
This may be done before the consular officer in question arrives in the territory of the
receiving State, or, if already in the receiving State, before he enters on his duties with
the consular post (CC 23.3).
If it fails to make good this obligation, “the receiving state, as the case may be, may
either withdraw the exequatur from the person concerned or cease to consider him as a
member of the consular staff” (CC 23.2)
Q. Does the receiving State have the duty to give reason for or explain its decision
declaring a consular officer persona non grata?
A. No. Paragraph 4, Article 23 of the Consular Convention provides that “the receiving
State is not obliged to give to the sending State reasons for its decision.”
(1) the receiving State notifies the sending State that his functions have come to an
end;
(2) the receiving State notifies the sending State that the former has ceased to
consider him as a member of the consular staff; and
This causes of terminating consular functions as set out in Article 25 of the Consular
Convention are not exhaustive. The following events may be added: death of the
30
member of the consular post, severance of the consular relations, and closure of the
consulate.
Q. Is the use of national flag a matter of right on the part of the sending State?
A. Yes. However, note that, as provided in Article 29(3) of the consular convention, “in the
exercise of the right . . . regard shall be had to the laws, regulations and usages of the
receiving State.”
The national flag may be flown and the coat-of-arms displayed by the sending State on
the building occupied by the consular post and at the entrance door thereof, on the
residence of the head of the consular post and on his means of transport when on
official business (CC 29.2).
(1) authorities of the receiving State shall not enter that part of the consular
premises exclusively used for consular work, except with the consent of the head
of the consular post, his designee, or the head of the diplomatic mission; but
consent of the consular head “may be assumed in case of fire or other disaster
requiring prompt protective action” (CC 31.2);
(2) the receiving State has the special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect
the consular premises against intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of
peace of the consular post or impairment of its dignity. But this duty is subject
to item (1) above (CC 31.3)
(3) consular premises, their furnishings, the property of the consular post and its
means of transport shall be immune from any form of requisition “ for purposes
of national defense of public utility” (CC 31.4);
(4) in case the consular premises, their furnishings, the property of the consular post
and its means of transport are expropriated for national defense or public utility,
“all possible steps shall be taken to avoid impeding the performance or consular
functions, and prompt, adequate and effective compensasion shal be paid to the
sending State” (CC 31.4).
This inviolability includes the consular archives and documents of a consular post are
exempt from “all national, regional or municipal dues and taxes whatsoever” ( CC 32).
Q. Are members of the consular post entitled to freedom of movement and travel?
A. Yes. It is the duty of the receiving state to “ensure freedom of movement and travel in
its territory to all members of the consular post.” However this freedom is limited by the
laws and regulations of the receiving State with respect to “zones entry into which is
prohibited or regulated for reasons of national security” (CC 34).
This privilege extends to a consular post headed by an honorary consular officer (58.1)
Q. how does the Consular convention provide for the freedom of information on the part
of the consular post?
A. It provides principally that-
(1) the receiving State shall permit and protect freedom of information on the part
of the consular post for all official purpose” (CC 35.1);
(2) in communicating with the Government, the diplomatic missions and other
consular post, . . . of the sending State, the consular post may employ all
appropriate means, including diplomatic or consular couriers, diplomatic or
consular bags and messages in code or cipher” (CC 35.1);
(3) the official correspondence of the consular post shall be inviolable” (CC 35.2); and
(4) the consular bag shall neither be opened nor detained (CC 35.3).
Q. May the receiving State request that the consular bag be opened?
32
A. Yes, of its authorities have serious reason to believe that the bag contains something
other than the correspondence, documents or articles “intended exclusively for official
use” (CC 35.3 and 35.4).
If this request is accepted, the bag may be opened in the presence of the authorized
representative of the sending State (CC 35.3).
If the request is refused, “the bag shall be returned to its place of origin” (CC 35.3).
Q. In the exercise of their functions, how may the consular officers address
communication with the authorities of the receiving State?
A. They may address the competent local authorities of their consular district.
However, the Consular Convention provides that they may address the competent
central authorities of the receiving State, “if and to the extent that this is allowed by the
laws, regulations and usages of the receiving State or by the relevant international
agreements” (CC 38).
Q. In the territory of the receiving State, may the consular post collect fees and charges
as provided by the laws of the sending State? Are these fees and charges subject to tax
by the receiving State?
A. Yes, and the proceeds of such collection are exempt from all dues and taxes in the
receiving State (CC 39).
33
2. They shall not be committed to prison nor be subject to any other form of
restriction to personal freedom, except in the case of grave crime and pursuant to a
decision of competent judicial authority, or in the execution of a final judicial decision
(CC 41.1, 41.2).
Q. Are consular officers and employees entitled to immunity from the jurisdiction of
administrative and judicial authorities in the receiving State?
A. Yes. But this immunity does not apply to a civil action either-
(1) arising out of a contract by a consular officer or employee, which he did not
conclude expressly or impliedly as an agent of the sending State; or
(2) by a third party for damage arising from an accident caused by vehicle, vessel or
aircraft in the receiving State (CC 43.2).
The rule that, in respect of acts performed by them in the exercise of their
functions (official acts) members of the consulate are amendable to the
jurisdiction of the judicial and administrative authorities of the receiving Sate, is
part of customary international law. This exemption represents an immunity
which the sending State is recognized as possessing in respect of acts which are
those of a sovereign State. By their very nature such acts are outside the
jurisdiction of the receiving State, whether civil, criminal or administrative. Since
official acts are outside the jurisdiction of the receiving State, no criminal
proceedings may be instituted in respect of them. Consequently, consular
officials enjoy complete inviolability in respect of their official acts (ILC yearbook,
1961, vol. II p. 117).
Acts excluded from immunity are private acts of the members of the consular post. The
ILC observes:
Unlike members of the diplomatic staff, all the members of the consular are in
principle subject to the jurisdiction of the receiving State, unless exempted by . .
. the present rules or by a provision of some other applicable international
agreement. In particular, they are, like any private person, subject to the
jurisdiction of the receiving State in respect of all their private acts (ILC Yearbook,
1961, vol. II, p.117).
Q. What fundamental rules are recognized by the Consular Convention in the taking of
testimony of a consular officer?
A. Under paragraph 2, Article 44 of the Consular Convention, These are:
(1) the authority of the receiving State requiring the evidence shall avoid
interference with the performance of his official duties;
(2) such authority shall, when possible, arrange for the taking of testimony at his
residence or at the consular post, or accept a written statement from him (See
ILC commentaries in ILC Yearbook 1961, vol. II, p. 118).
Q. May personal inviolability, immunity from jurisdiction, and the privilege not be a
witness, be waived?
A. Yes, these may be waived but not only by the sending State “with regard to a member
of the consular post” (CC 45.1), including an honorary consular officer (CC 58.2).
The ILC is of the view that the “capacity to waive immunity is vested exclusively in the
sending State.” The consular officer himself does not have that capacity (ILC Yearbook
1964, vol. II, p. 118).
An exception to the “express” rule above lies in the case of a consular officer or
employee who initiates a proceeding in a matter where he might enjoy immunity from
jurisdiction with respect to any counter-claim directly connected with the principal claim
(see Article 45.2 of the Consular convention).
35
Q. are members of the consular post entitled to exemption from certain requirements
under the law of the receiving State?
A. Yes. They are entitled to exemption from the following requirements:
2. work permits for employment of foreign labor, with respect to services rendered
by them for the sending State (CC 47.1)
3. social security provisions, with respect to services rendered by them for the
sending State (CC 48.1);
4. all dues and taxes, “personal or real, national, regional or municipal” (CC 49.1)
5. customs duties and inspection, “in accordance with such laws and regulations as
. . . [the receiving State] may adopt” (CC 50.1); and
6. all personal services, public services of any kind, and military obligations such as
those connected with “requisitioning, military contributions and billeting” (CC
52).
Q. Are there charges and taxes which are excluded from the exemption mentioned in
item 4 of 3.104 above?
A. Yes. The following taxes and dues are excluded from exemption:
4. taxes on private income, including capital grains, and investment income, and
sourced from the receiving State;
36
6. registration, court or record fees, mortgage dues, and stamp duties in private
transactions. (CC 49.1).
1. consular employees and members of the service staff who carry on private
gainful occupation in the receiving State (57.2(a));
2. members of the family of the said employees and staff members (57.2(b));
Q. What privileges and immunities are accorded consular posts headed by an honorary
consular officer and the honorary consular officers themselves?
A. (1) As to consular posts headed by honorary consular officers, the following shall apply:
(a) full facilities to be accorded by the receiving State for the performance of
functions of the consular post (cc 28,58.1);
(b) the right to use the sending state’s national flag and its coats-of-arms
(c) freedom of movement and travel to all members of the consular post in the
territory of the receiving State, subject to the latter’s laws (cc 34, 58.1);
(d) freedom of communication for all official purposes, including the use of
diplomatic or consular couriers, diplomatic or consular bags, messages in cipher
or code, and, with the consent of the receiving State, use of wireless transmitter
(cc 35.1, 35.2, 58.1)
(f) right to communicate with the nationals of the receiving State and the right of
such nationals to be informed of this right (cc 36.1, 58.1);
37
(g) protection of the consular post against intrusion or damage and from
disturbance of the peace or impairment of its dignity (cc 59, 58.1);
(h) exemption of consular premises from all national, regional or municipal dues
and taxes whatsoever, other than those representing payment for specific
services rendered (cc 60.1, 58.1);
(i) inviolability of consular archives and documents (cc 61, 58.1); and
(j) exemption from customs duties and taxes as provided by the laws of the
receiving State, with respect to the following articles on official use: coats-of-
arms, flags, signboards, seals and stamps, books, official printed matter, official
furniture, office equipment and similar articles supplied by or at the instance of
the sending State to the consular posts (cc 62, 58.1)
(a) the obligation of the receiving State to notify the sending State through
diplomatic channel in the event of arrest or detention, pending trial, of the
honorary consular officer (cc 42, 58.2);
(d) if criminal proceedings are instituted, they shall be conducted with respect due
to the honorary consular officer by reason of his position and, if under detention,
the proceedings shall be instituted with the minimum of delay (cc 63, 58.2);
(e) the duty of the receiving State to accord to an honorary consular officer such
protection as may be required by reason of his position (cc 64, 58.2);
(f) exemption from registration of aliens and residence permits, with the exception
of honorary consular officers who carry on professional or commercial activity
for personal profit in the receiving State (cc 65, 68.2);
38
(g) exemption from all taxes and dues on income from the sending State on account
of his consular functions (cc 66, 58.2); and
(h) exemption from all personal services and public services of any kind whatsoever
as well as from military obligation such as those connected with requisitioning
military contributions and billeting (cc 67, 58.2).
Q. What are the privileges and immunities pertaining to consular officers who are
nationals of or permanent residents in the receiving State?
A. They shall enjoy only immunity from jurisdiction and from personal inviolability in
respect of official acts in the exercise of their functions (cc 71.1).
They are also entitled to decline to give evidence on matters connected with their
functions or to produce official correspondence and documents relating thereto,
including evidence as expert witness on the law of the sending State (cc44.3, 71.1).
Q. When does a member of a consular post begin to enjoy the privileges and immunities
under the Consular Convention?
A. From the moment he enters the territory of the receiving State “on proceeding to take
up his post.”
If he is already in its territory, from the moment he enters on his consular duties (cc
53.1).
Q. Does this rule hold true even if his consular functions have ceased before he leaves
the receiving State?
A. Yes. He continues to be accorded privileges and immunities even after his functions
have ceased before his departure from the receiving State (cc 53.3).
Q. Is the duration of his privileges and immunities affected by armed conflict between
the sending State and the receiving State?
A. No. He continues to be entitled to them until he leaves the receiving State or on the
expiry of a reasonable time to do so (cc 53.3).
39
Q. As to his immunity from jurisdiction, what is the rule with respect to his acts already
performed in the course of his consular functions?
A. The Consular Convention provides that “immunity from jurisdiction shall continue to
subsist without limitation of time” (cc 53.4).
A special mission is an agency of a State and may be entrusted with the conduct of any
specific official business such as negotiation for trade agreement or participation in a
formal state ceremony.
Q. May more than two States be involved in the sending of special missions?
A. Yes, as in the following instances:
(1) a State desiring to send the same special mission to two or more States (csm 4);
(2) a joint special mission of two States to another State (csm 5); and
(3) two or more States may each send a special mission at the same time to another
State to deal together, as agreed by them, with a question of interest common
to all of them (csm 6).
40
In all cases, prior consent of the receiving State is required.
Q. How much freedom does the sending State have in determining the size and
composition of the special mission?
A. In principle, the sending State “may freely appoint the members of the special mission
after giving the receiving State all necessary information concerning the size and
composition of the special mission, and in particular the names and designations of the
persons it intends to appoint” (csm 8).
(1) accept a special mission the size of which it does not consider reasonable under
the circumstances (csm 8);
(2) accept a person as a member of the special mission, without giving reasons (csm
8);
(3) consent to its national to be appointed as a member of the special mission (csm
10.2); or
(4) consent to a national of a third State who is not a national of the sending State
to be appointed as a member of the special mission (csm 10.3).
Q. May a national of the receiving State be a member of the special mission? What
about a national of a third State?
A. Yes, with the consent of the receiving State, which may be withdrawn any time (csm
10.2).
A national of a third State who is not also a national of the sending State may be a
member of a special mission (csm 10.3).
1) agreement;
(1) the receiving State may do so at any time, even before his arrival in the territory
of the receiving State;
(2) the receiving State does not have the duty to explain its decision;
(3) the sending State shall recall the person concerned or terminate his functions
with the special mission (csm 12.1);
42
(4) the receiving State may refuse to recognize the person declared non grata as a
member of the special mission if the sending State refuses, or fails within a
reasonable period to comply with its obligation as stated above (csm 12.2).
Q. With which organ of the receiving State shall the special mission conduct its official
business?
A. The special mission shall conduct its business with or through the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs or with organ of the receiving State as may have been agreed (csm 15).
Q. How shall precedence among them be determined when two or more special
messions meet in the territory of the receiving State or of a third State?
A. In the absence of a special agreement, precedence shall be according to the alphabetical
order of the States as used by the protocol of the State in whose territory the special
missions are meeting (csm 16.1).
Q. May special missions from two or more States meet in the territory of a third State?
A. Yes, but only after obtaining the consent of that State, which must be express (csm
18.1).
The third State shall assume the rights and obligations of a receiving State with respect
to the sending States (csm 18.3).
Q. When the Head of State leads a special mission, what privileges and immunities shall
he/she enjoy?
A. In the receiving State or third State, he/she shall enjoy “the facilities, privileges and
immunities accorded by international law to Heads of State on an official visit” (csm
21.1).
Q. What about in the case of Head of Government and the Minister of Foreign Affairs?
A. In addition to what is granted under the Convention on Special Missions they shall enjoy
“the facilities, privileges and immunities accorded by international law” (csm 21.2).
43
Q. How is personal inviolability defined with respect t the representatives of the sending
State in the special mission?
A. Personal inviolability means that their persons and those of the members of its
diplomatic staff shall not be liable to any form of arrest or detention. It is the duty of
the receiving State to treat them with due respect and it “shall take all appropriate steps
to prevent any attack on their persons, freedom or dignity” (csm 29).
However, inviolability pertains only to official acts performed in the exercise of their
functions, if they are nationals of or permanently residing in the receiving State (csm
40.1).
Q. What is the scope of inviolability with respect to the premises of the special mission?
A. The premises where the special mission is established shall be inviolable. This principle
comprehends the following rules:
1. The agents of the receiving State may not enter the said premises, except with
the consent of the head of the special mission or, where appropriate, of the
head of the diplomatic mission of the sending State accredited by the receiving
State (csm 25.1).
2. Such consent may be assumed to have been given in case of fire or other
disaster that seriously endangers public safety and “only in the event that it has
not been possible to obtain the express consent of the head of the special
mission or where appropriate, of the head of the permanent mission” (csm
25.1).
3. It is the duty of the receiving State “to take all appropriate steps to protect the
premises of the special mission against any intrusion or damage to prevent any
disturbance of the peace or impairment of its dignity (csm 25.2).
4. The premises of the special mission, their furnishings, other property used in the
operation of the special mission and its means of transport shall be immune
from search, requisition, attachment or execution (csm 25.3).
Q. Are the archives and documents of the special mission covered by the inviolability
rule?
A. Yes. They shell be inviolable “at all times and wherever they may be” (csm 26).
44
Q. What are the principal constituent rules of immunity from jurisdiction on the part of
the representatives of the sending States in the special mission?
A. The rules are as follows:
1. They shall enjoy immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of the receiving State
(csm 31.1).
2. They shall also enjoy immunity from the civil and administrative jurisdiction of
the receiving State, except in the following cases:
(a) a real action relating to private immovable property in the territory of the
receiving State, unless the person concerned holds it on behalf of the
sending State for the purposes of the special mission;
(d) an action for damages arising from an accident caused by a vehicle used
outside the official functions of the person concerned (csm 51.2 9d)).
3. Except in the cases mentioned above, no execution may be taken against them
and provided that the measures of execution concerned can be taken without
infringing the inviolability of their person or their accommodation (csm 31.4).
5. Immunity from jurisdiction of the receiving State does not exempt them from
the jurisdiction of the sending State. (csm 31.5)
Note that if members of the special missions are nationals of, or permanently
residing in the receiving State, immunity from jurisdiction pertains only to
“official acts performed in the exercise of their functions” (csm 40.1).
2. They are themselves exempt from all dues and taxes, personal or real, regional
or municipal (csm 33).
3. With respect to services rendered to the sending State, they are exempt from
social security provisions in the receiving State (csm 32.1).
4. They are exempted from all personal services, public service of any kind
whatsoever, and military obligations such as those connected with
requisitioning, military contributions, and billeting (csm 34).
5. They are exempted from all customs duties, taxes, and related charges on
articles for official use of the special mission as well as on articles for the
personal use of the representatives of the sending State in the special mission, as
provided by the laws of the receiving State (csm 35.1).
6. They are exempted from inspection of their personal luggage, unless there are
serious grounds for presuming that it contains articles not covered by exemption
(i.e., not for official use of the mission and not for personal use of such
representatives) or articles prohibited or controlled by the law of the receiving
State (csm 35.2).
(1) indirect taxes that are normally incorporated in the price of goods or services;
(2) dues and taxes on private immovable property located in the receiving state,
unless the person concerned holds it on behalf of the sending State for purposes
of the special mission;
(3) estate or inheritance duties levied by the receiving State, including those on
movable property which is in the receiving State “solely because of the presence
there of the deceased as a member of the special mission or of the family of such
member;”
(4) dues and taxes on private income from a source in the receiving State;
46
(5) capital taxes on investment in commercial undertaking in the receiving State;
(7) registration, court or record fees, mortgage dues and stamp duty (CSM 33)
Q. Are members of the special mission entitled to freedom of movement in the receiving
State?
A. It is the duty of the receiving State to ensure them such freedom of movement and
travel in its territory “as in necessary for the performance of the functions of the special
mission” (CSM 27).
However, this is subject to the laws of the receiving State concerning zones entry into
which is prohibited or regulated for reasons of national security (CSM 27).
Q. What are the specific rules applicable pursuant to freedom of communication on the
part of the members of the special mission?
A. These are as follows:
2. The official correspondence of the special mission shall be inviolable. This applies
to “all correspondence relating to the special mission and its functions (CSM 28.2).
4. The courier of the special mission shall be protected by the receiving State in the
performance of his functions. He shall enjoy personal inviolability and shall not
be liable to any form of arrest or detention (CSM 28.6).
5. The bag of the special mission may be entrusted to the captain of a ship or of a
commercial aircraft scheduled to land at an authorized port of entry, but he shall
not be considered as a courier of the special mission (CSM 28.8).
47
Q. Do the members of the special mission’s administrative and technical staff enjoy the
privileges and immunities?
A. They enjoy personal inviolability, inviolability of private communication, immunity from
jurisdiction, exemption from social security provisions, personal exemption from dues
and taxes, and exemption from personal services as set out above, as well as exemption
from customs duties and inspection with respect to “articles imported at the time of
first entry into the territory of the receiving State” (CSM 36).
However, as to immunity from civil and administrative jurisdiction, this shall not extend
to “acts performed outside the course of their duties” (CSM 31.2 and 36).
Q. Do members of the special mission’s service staff enjoy privileges and immunities?
A. They are subject to the following rules:
1. They enjoy the immunity from jurisdiction of the receiving State but only with
respect to acts performed in the course of their official duties. (CSM 37).
2. They are exempt from personal dues and taxes on emoluments received by
reason of their employment (CSM 37).
3. They are also exempt from social security legislation as indicated in 3.137 above
(CSM 37).
(2) they are not nationals of, or permanent residents in, the receiving State ( CSM
39.1).
48
Q. May immunity from jurisdiction be waived by the sending State?
A. Yes, and it is required that “Waiver must always be express” (CSM 41.1 and 41.2).
Q. What is the duration of privileges and immunities pertaining to the members of the
special mission?
A. (1) Every member of the special mission shall enjoy the privileges and immunities he
is entitled to from the moment he enters the territory of the receiving State “for the
purpose of performing his functions in the special mission or, if he is already in its
territory, from the time when his appointment is notified to the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs or such other organ of the receiving State as may be agreed” (CSM 43.1)
When his functions have come to an end, his privileges and immunities shall normally
cease the moment he leaves the territory of the receiving State, or on the expiration of
a reasonable period within which to do so. They shall continue to subsist up to that time
“even in case of armed conflict” (CSM 43.2).
Q. When the functions of the special mission come to an end, what is the consequent
duty of the sending State?
A. It must withdraw the property and archives of the special mission within a reasonable
period of time (CSM 46.1).
Q. If the functions of the special mission have to come an end following severance of
diplomatic or consular relations, may the sending State entrust the custody of its
property and archives to a third State?
A. Yes, provided that it is entrusted to a third State acceptable to the receiving State (CSM
46.2).
Q. Is this true even in case of armed conflict between the sending and the receiving
State?
49
A. Yes. (CSM 46.2). Also note that, in armed conflict or not, the receiving State has the duty
to grant the sending State facilities for removing its archives from the territory of the
receiving State (CSM 345.2).
Q. May members of the special mission practices for personal profit their profession or
engage in commercial activity in the receiving State?
A. no, they are not allowed to do so (CSM 48).
Q. Does International Law provide for the prevention and punishment of crimes against
diplomatic agents?
A. Yes. This is provided in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes
Against Internationally Protected Persons, Including Diplomatic Agents. The United
Nations General Assembly adopted the Convention in Resolution 3166 (XXVII) on the 14
December 1973. It was opened for signature on that date. It entered into force on 20
February 1977.
(1) murder, kidnapping or the attack upon the person or liberty of an internationally
protected person, which includes diplomatic agent;
(2) violent attack on the official premises, private accommodation or his means of
transport likely to endanger his person or liberty;
(5) an act constituting participation as accomplice in any such attack (CPPC 2).
Q. What are the principal obligations of the States Parties to the Convention in respect of
such crimes?
A. These are:
50
1. primarily the State Party in whose territory the alleged offender is present, has
the obligation to either extradite him or prosecute him (CPPC 7), and
2. each State Party shall provide that they be made a crime under its internal law
punishable by appropriate penalties (CPPC 2.1 and 2.2)
Q. How many a State Party establishment its jurisdiction over such crimes?
A. Under the following circumstances each State Party may take measures to establish its
jurisdiction:
(1) when the crime is committed in its territory or on board a ship or aircraft
registered in that State;
(4) where the alleged offender is present in its territory and it does not extradite
(CPPC 3.2)
(1) taking practicable measures to prevent preparations for the commission of such
crimes within or outside their territories; and
Q. What is the duty of a State Party if the alleged offender is present in its territory?
A. It shall take such appropriate measures under its internal law so as to ensure his
presence for the purpose of prosecution or extradiction.
The measures taken shall be communicated directly to the following States or through
the UN Secretary-General:
Q. What rules are established in respect to States Parties which are also parties to
existing extradition treaties or may be parties to future extradition treaties?
A. The principal rules are:
1. if the crimes set forth above are not listed in any extradition treaty existing
between them “they shall be deemed to be included as such therein” (CPPC 8.1);
2. in future extradition treaties that they may conclude, they undertake to include
those crimes as extraditable offenses (CPPC 8.1);
4. as to State Parties which do not require such condition, they shall “recognize
those crimes as extraditable offenses between themselves.” The procedural provisions
and other conditions of law of the requesting State are applicable ( CPPC 8.3).
52
53