MAP

MAPOF
MAP OFMALAYSIA
OF MALAYSIA
MALAYSIA

HIGHWAY NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN

FOR MALAYSIA

POPULATION : 26 MILLION
AREA: 330,252 SQ.KM

by

Dato’ Ir. Hj. Mohamad Razali bin Othman

Deputy Director General
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MALAYSIA
November, 2006

1 2

TRANSPORT
TRANSPORTSHARE
TRANSPORT SHARE
SHARE VEH
VEHREGISTRATION
VEH REGISTRATION
REGISTRATION

SHARE OF TRANSPORT VEHICLE REGISTRATION

14,000
PASSENGER 12,000
No. of Vehicles (x1000)

‘000 PERCENTAGE 10,000

PERSONS 8,000
PRIVATE CAR 1,836,338 64.8% 6,000
BUS 850,000 30.0% 4,000
RAIL 133,343 4.7% 2,000

AIR 12,830 0.5% -

1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

FREIGHT YEAR

‘000 TONNES PERCENTAGE V E HI CLE COM P OSI T I ON

ROAD 302,975 96.4% Buses

Lor r i es 0. 4%
8. 8%
RAIL 4,000 1.2%
M ot or cycl es
48. 7%
AIR 80 0.1%
Car s
MARITIME 7,175 2.3% 42. 1%

3 4
 EX
EXTRAFFIC
EX TRAFFICDEMAND
TRAFFIC DEMAND
DEMAND ROAD
ROADLENGTH
ROAD LENGTH
LENGTH

EXISTING TRAFFIC SITUATION

Estimated Daily Total Road Traffic Demand in Peninsular Malaysia TOTAL ROAD LENGTH : 74,603 km
QUANTITIES Ave. Annual
Item Growth Rate Federal Roads
1991#1 2004#2
(% pa)
1 Total Vehicle Trips (Million Trips) 7.08 20.51 8.5
Total : 16, 984 km
• Paved: 16,129 km
2 Total Commodity (Million Ton) 1.77 5.05 8.4 • Unpaved:855 km
3 Total veh-km (million veh-km) 122.35 425.24 10.1
State Roads and Municipal Roads
4 Total Passengers-km (million pass-km) 242.35 571.63 6.8 Total: 56,419 km
z Paved: 41,457 km
5 Total ton-km (million-km) 67.72 231.84 9.9
z Unpaved:14,962 km
Toll Roads/ Highways
Total:1,238 km
Sources: #1 HNDP Study 1993
#2 HNDP Review
5 6

ROAD
ROADNETWORK
ROAD NETWORKPLAN
NETWORK PLAN
PLAN HISTORICAL
HISTORICALPERSPECTIVE
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
PERSPECTIVE

EXISTING
EXISTING ROAD
ROAD NETWORK
NETWORK IN
IN PENINSULAR
PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
MALAYSIA

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

Pre-1950’s : Roads built for trade purposes

1960s & 1970s : Rurals roads to accelerate development

1980s -1990s : Inter-urban linkages, alleviation of transport problems

2000 onwards : Connecting developed & less developed areas

7 8
 DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENTPOLICIES
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
POLICIES DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENTBUDGET
DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
BUDGET

INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BUDGET

CURRENT ROAD DEVELOPMENT POLICIES 7TH MALAYSIA PLAN 8TH MALAYSIA PLAN
(1996-2000) (2001-2005)

™ Development of roads to increase accessibility

Roads US$ 3.1 b US$ 4.90 b
to facilitate the establishment of new growth centers and
Airports US$ 0.3 b US$ 0.54 B
reduce travel time and costs. Ports US$ 0.3 b US$ 0.80 b
Rail US$ 1.4 b US$ 1.66 b
™ Higher standards applied in the construction of Urban transport US$ 0.2 b US$ 0.24 b
new roads particularly those linking industrial areas with
ports and airport US$ 5.3 b US$ 8.14 b

™ Utilize multimodal transportation

9 10

DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENTBUDGET
DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
BUDGET

HIGHWAY NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN (1993)

ROAD DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
Expenditure on Road Development Plans Under
Each 5-Year Malaysia Plan From 1966 to 2005

8.00
Private Sector Total Road Expenditure

6.00 BOT Projects

Allocation (US billion)

4.00 Public Road

Development Projects

2.00

0.00
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Malaysia Plan
Note: Current Prices with Conversion Rate US$1=RM3.8 • 15,298 KM OF EXPRESSWAYS,
HIGHWAYS AND PRIMARY ROADS IN 7th,
8th & 9th M’SIAN PLAN.
• TOTAL INVESTMENT OF US$ 22 billion
(1993 price).
• HNDP review carried out in 2004

11 12
 HNDP
HNDPREVIEW
HNDP REVIEWOBJECTIVES
REVIEW OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES HNDP
HNDPTASKS
HNDP TASKS
TASKS

HIGHWAY NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW HIGHWAY NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW

TASKS
The main objectives of the Review Study are:
• Identify present and foreseeable road transport issues and
• To formulate a Highway Master Plan for the National problems;
Highway;
• Analyse the highway network planning constraints and
• To prioritise new and improved linkages in the planned opportunities;
network with respect to technical and economical
considerations and to formulate a road development • Formulate highway network development strategies and
programme; alternative concepts of highway development;

• To identify strategic interchanges along the expressways • Propose a Highway Network Master Plan, schedules of
and federal roads deemed necessary up till the year 2020. implementation programmes and strategies to coincide with the
forthcoming Malaysia Plans up till year 2020; and

• Identify suitable routes for tolling application

13 14

DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT EX.

EX.TRAFFIC
EX. TRAFFICVOLUME
TRAFFIC VOLUME
VOLUME

HIGHWAY NETWORK DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT EXISTING

EXISTING TRAFFIC
TRAFFIC VOLUME
VOLUME

Daily traffic - 20.51 million vehicle trips

GENERAL APPROACH
Daily dist traveled - 425.24 mil vehicle-km
• Identification of existing and foreseeable road transport problems and
issues;
Daily link volume : 1,000 - 300,000 vehicles
• Analysis of the highway network planning constraints and
opportunities

• Formulation of a functional highway network or classification;

• Formulation of an overall highway network development concept plan

that takes into account the highway network development policies and
strategies while provides the socio-economic and environmental
sustainability.

15 16
 PROBLEMS
PROBLEMSAND
PROBLEMS ANDISSUES
AND ISSUES
ISSUES

FUTURE TRAFFIC DEMAND

EXISTING TRAFFIC SITUATION OF HIGHWAY NETWORK IN
PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
By 2020
Veh registration - 12.2 million cars,
IDENTIFICATION
IDENTIFICATION OF
OF EXISTING
EXISTING HIGHWAY
HIGHWAY TRAFFIC
TRAFFIC PROBLEMS
PROBLEMS
148 thousand buses AND
AND ISSUES
ISSUES
2 million lorries
• Predominance of Car Usage
• Strengthening of Network Configuration
GDP per capita - increase 2.4 times • Disparity in Accessibility between the West and East Coast Region
• Reduction in Travel Speed on Major Federal Roads
annual passenger traffic - 22,301 million person trips by car • Chronic Congestion at At-Grade Intersection on Federal Roads
3,957 million person trips by bus

annual freight traffic (road) - 5,412 million tonne

17 18

TRAVEL
TRAVELMODES
TRAVEL MODES
MODES PROBLEMS
PROBLEMSAND
PROBLEMS ANDISSUES
AND ISSUES
ISSUES

EXISTING
EXISTING TRAFFIC
TRAFFIC SITUATION
SITUATION OF
OF HIGHWAY
HIGHWAY NETWORK
NETWORK IN
IN
PENINSULAR
PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
MALAYSIA EXISTING TRAFFIC SITUATION OF HIGHWAY NETWORK IN
Comparison of Travel Modes (1991-2004) PENINSULAR MALAYSIA

IDENTIFICATION
IDENTIFICATION OF
OF EXISTING
EXISTING HIGHWAY
HIGHWAY TRAFFIC
TRAFFIC PROBLEMS
PROBLEMS
AND
AND ISSUES
ISSUES
• Predominance of Car Usage
• Strengthening of Network Configuration
• Disparity in Accessibility between the West and East Coast Region
• Reduction in Travel Speed on Major Federal Roads
• Chronic Congestion at At-Grade Intersection on Federal Roads

19 20
 ANALYSIS OF DEV. POLICIES GOALS
GOALS&
GOALS &OBJECTIVES
& OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES

ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS OF
OF EXISTING
EXISTING ROAD
ROAD DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
POLICIES HIGHWAY NETWORK DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN
GOAL AND OBJECTIVES

• Supply Versus Demand Driven Implementation • GOAL 1 : To develop a National Road Network in line with the “Vision 2020" of the
• Privatization Schemes country.
OBJECTIVES :
• Deferred Payment Schemes • To develop a road network with a sufficient capacity to meet travel demand;
• To develop a road network that can sustain the rapid growing regions and to
• Road Safety Issues
promote regional development;
• Environmental Issues • To develop a road network that is realistic and able to be expanded upon demand.
• Social Impact Issue • GOAL 2 : To develop a safe, reliable and effective road network system while being
environmentally and economically sustainable.
OBJECTIVES :
• To provide road infrastructures that minimise external dis- environmental
discomfort and enhance the traffic safety;
• To ensure the regional road network does not jeopardise the natural environment;
• To ensure road infrastructure development does not disrupt the community well
being and safety;
• Ensuring the availability of a reliable infrastructure facilities and services at
reasonable cost.

21 22

GOALS & OBJECTIVES STRATEGIES

HIGHWAY NETWORK DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN HIGHWAY NETWORK DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES IN

PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
GOAL AND OBJECTIVES

• GOAL 3 : To develop a regional road network that encourages balance distribution of

transport modes • To Strengthen the West Coast
OBJECTIVES :
• To ensure the investment on road transport infrastructure does not pose Network and East Coast
overburden on the national resources. Network
• To promote multi-modalism to enhance seamless integration of all modes of • To Improve and Strengthening
transport; the East West Movement
• To increase efficiency, productivity and reliability of services.
• To Provide Linkages and
• GOAL 4 : To serve as a mean of extending urban amenities, social and infra-structural Support Growth of Regional
facilities to rural area. Development
OBJECTIVES : • To Improve linkages to the
• To provide road infrastructure that are in line with the urban hierarchy;
• To provide additional access to the current existing road network and highways Central Corridor
• To provide sufficient road infrastructure to less developed areas;
• To develop and improve linkages between the urban, regional and growth centres.

23 24
 STRATEGY FOR IMPLEMENTATION

HIGHWAY NETWORK DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT CONCLUSION

Presently, the road transport handles some 99% of
STRATEGY FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ROAD PROJECTS
the total passenger and freight transport in
Peninsular Malaysia
• Road Improvement through the implementation of Road Upgrading
and Widening and provision of interchanges
Need to encourage the use of other modes
• Provision of New Road Network through demand driven
implementation and socio-economic requirements;
Review Study re-establish the priority list for
• Provision of New Road Network through privatisation schemes.
project implementation in the formulation of a new
Highway Network Development Master Plan

25 26

THANK YOU

CONCLUSION
Development of Road Length in Malaysia
1900-2020

100000
HNDP Study
80000 1st Malaysia
Road Length (km)

60000 1st Macadam Plan Period

40000
Road HNDP Review
THANK YOU
20000
1st BOT Highway

0
20
00

10

30

40

50

80

90
20

60

70

00

10

20
19

19

19

19

19

19

19
19

19

19

20

20

Year
Source: HNDP Review Study Team, 2005

27 28