Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

SMFM Papers ajog.

org

Proximity of magnesium exposure to delivery


and neonatal outcomes
Amy L. Turitz, MD; Gloria T. Too, MD; Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, MD, MSc

BACKGROUND: In infants delivered preterm, magnesium sulfate re- RESULTS: A total of 906 infants were analyzed. Five hundred sixty-eight
duces cerebral palsy in survivors. The benefit of magnesium given remote were last exposed to magnesium <12 hours prior to delivery and 338
from delivery is unclear. were last exposed 12 hours. Cerebral palsy occurred in 28 offspring
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the association of time from (3%), 2.3% of those last exposed <12 hours vs 4.4% last exposed 12
last exposure to magnesium with cerebral palsy. hours prior to delivery (P ¼ .07). On adjusted analyses, last exposure to
STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter trial magnesium <12 hours prior to delivery was associated with a significant
evaluating magnesium for neuroprotection. For this study, we included reduction in cerebral palsy compared with last exposure 12 hours
women with live, nonanomalous, singleton gestations who received (adjusted odds ratio, 0.41, 95% confidence interval, 0.18e0.91,
magnesium. Pregnancies with missing information at the 2 year follow-up P ¼ .03). There was no difference in secondary outcomes.
were excluded. Women were divided into 2 groups based on exposure CONCLUSION: Exposure to magnesium proximal to delivery
timing: last infusion of magnesium <12 hours and last infusion of mag- (<12 hours) is associated with a reduced odds of cerebral palsy
nesium 12 hours prior to delivery. The primary outcome was cerebral compared with more remote exposure. This highlights the importance of
palsy of any severity at 2 years of life. Secondary outcomes were mod- the timing of magnesium for neuroprotection for women at risk of
erate/severe cerebral palsy and moderate/severe cerebral palsy or death. preterm delivery.
A c2 test, Student t test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for bivariate
associations. We fit a multivariable logistic regression model to adjust for Key words: cerebral palsy, magnesium sulfate, neuroprotection, pre-
confounders. term delivery, time of last exposure

C
among
erebral palsy continues to be a
common and costly problem
preterm infants.1 With
duration required to reduce the risk of
cerebral palsy, none have looked at the
optimal timing of magnesium sulfate
sulfate administration to women at high
risk for preterm delivery decreased the
rate of cerebral palsy or death.
increasing survival of preterm neonates exposure in relation to delivery with In this study, women were exposed
and no curative therapy available for regard to neonatal outcomes.2,4-7 It re- to magnesium sulfate if they were at
cerebral palsy, efforts to prevent its mains unknown how exposure to mag- imminent risk for delivery between 24
development are critical. In 2008, Rouse nesium sulfate remote from delivery and 31 weeks because of the rupture of
et al2 demonstrated that exposure to compares with exposure closer to, or at membranes, advanced preterm labor, or
magnesium sulfate for women at risk of the time of, delivery itself in terms of fetal indications. In this protocol,
preterm delivery reduces the risk of ce- cerebral palsy risk reduction. The aim of magnesium was discontinued after 12
rebral palsy in surviving children. Both our study therefore was to evaluate the hours if delivery had not occurred and
the American College of Obstetricians association of time from last exposure to was no longer considered imminent.
and Gynecologists and the Society for magnesium sulfate before delivery with Magnesium was restarted when delivery
Maternal-Fetal Medicine advocate the cerebral palsy. was again deemed imminent. As a
use of magnesium sulfate for this pur- result, not all women who were exposed
pose.3 Despite this, much remains un- Materials and Methods to magnesium sulfate were receiving the
known about the optimal characteristics This is a secondary analysis of the medication at the time of preterm
of magnesium sulfate administration for Randomized Clinical Trial of Magne- delivery.
neuroprotection. sium Sulfate for the Prevention of For the current study, women with
Whereas other studies have looked for Cerebral Palsy conducted by the Eunice singleton gestations were included.
the ideal magnesium sulfate dosage and Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Those assigned to the placebo group or
Child Health and Human Development with major fetal malformations, still-
Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. birth, or missing outcome data at 2 years
Cite this article as: Turitz AL, Too GT, Gyamfi- The details of this study have been pre- were excluded. Study groups were
Bannerman C. Proximity of magnesium exposure to viously reported.2 Briefly, this was a defined by time interval from the last
delivery and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol multicenter, randomized, placebo- magnesium sulfate exposure to delivery:
2016;215:508.e1-6.
controlled study conducted at 20 in- exposure to magnesium sulfate <12
0002-9378/$36.00 stitutions across the United States from hours prior to delivery, including at the
ª 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.004
1997 to 2004 with the aim of deter- time of delivery, and exposure 12
mining whether antenatal magnesium hours prior to delivery. If magnesium

508.e1 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology OCTOBER 2016


ajog.org SMFM Papers

FIGURE
Flow diagram of patient inclusion/exclusion

Proximity of magnesium exposure to delivery and neonatal outcomes is shown.


Turitz et al. Proximity of magnesium exposure to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016.

sulfate was discontinued and restarted, Gross Motor Function Classification outcome based on timing of magnesium
the time from the last exposure to System level 1; moderate, Gross Motor sulfate, adjusting for confounding fac-
delivery was used. Function Classification System level 2 tors that were identified based on his-
The primary outcome was any type or 3; or severe, Gross Motor Function torical importance and in the bivariate
of cerebral palsy, assessed and diag- Classification System level 4 or 5).2 analyses with a value of P < .05. These
nosed at or beyond 2 years of age Secondary outcomes included the included maternal race, education level,
(corrected for prematurity) by an following: (1) moderate and severe ce- prenatal care, nulliparity, preeclampsia,
annually certified pediatrician or pedi- rebral palsy and (2) moderate and severe antibiotic exposure, total grams of
atric neurologist if 2 or more of the cerebral palsy or death. magnesium sulfate received, mode of
following 3 features were present: a Baseline characteristics among the delivery, gestational age at delivery, and
delay of 30% in gross motor devel- cohorts were compared using a Student t neonatal sepsis.
opmental milestones; abnormality in test, Mann-Whitney U test, and c2 tests Using goodness-of-fit testing, the
muscle tone, 4 or absent deep tendon as appropriate. Incidences of the pri- model that best fit the data was chosen
reflexes, or movement abnormality; mary and secondary outcomes were as the final model. This model included
persistence of primitive reflexes or compared between the 2 groups. Unad- magnesium sulfate as a categorical
absence of protective reflexes. justed relative risks with 95% confidence rather than a continuous variable. All
When cerebral palsy was diagnosed, intervals were estimated. Multivariable tests were 2 tailed with P < .05
the Gross Motor Function Classification logistic regression models were devel- considered significant. Because our
System was used to assess severity (mild, oped to estimate the risk of each sample size was fixed from the parent

OCTOBER 2016 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 508.e2


SMFM Papers ajog.org

TABLE 1
Patient characteristics by timing of magnesium sulfate exposurea
Last magnesium exposure <12 h Last magnesium exposure 12 h
Characteristics prior to delivery (n ¼ 568) prior to delivery (n ¼ 338) P value
Maternal age, y b
26.21  5.82 26.78  5.80 .16
Advanced maternal age (35 y) 58 (10.21) 38 (11.24) .63
Race
African-American 251 (44.19) 152 (44.97) .79
White 203 (35.74) 125 (36.98)
Hispanic 99 (17.43) 56 (16.57)
Asian 7 (1.23) 3 (0.89)
Native American/other 8 (1.41) 2 (0.59)
Marital status
Married 281 (49.56) 171 (50.59) .94
Single 230 (40.56) 133 (39.35)
Unknown 56 (9.88) 34 (10.06)
2
Body mass index, kg/m
<18.5 98 (17.25) 46 (13.61) .24
18.5e24.9 233 (41.02) 151 (44.67)
25e29.9 116 (20.42) 59 (17.46)
>30 121 (21.30) 82 (24.26)
Education, y b
11.64  2.49 12.01  2.51 .03
Prenatal care 539 (94.89) 306 (90.53) .01
Smoking 154 (27.11) 91 (26.92) .95
Alcohol use 44 (7.75) 33 (9.76) .29
Recreational drug use 62 (10.92) 32 (9.47) .49
Nulliparous 224 (39.44) 98 (28.99) .002
Previous preterm delivery 155 (27.29) 95 (28.11) .79
Diabetes 27 (4.75) 19 (5.62) .57
Preeclampsia 3 (0.53) 7 (2.07) .03
Membranes ruptured 475 (98.75) 308 (99.04) .71
Antenatal corticosteroid exposure 23 (4.20) 15 (4.50) .83
Antibiotic exposure 502 (88.38) 314 (92.90) .03
Chorioamnionitis 67 (11.80) 36 (10.65) .60
Sepsis 100 (17.61) 53 (15.68) .45
c
Total magnesium infused, g 39.60, 29.30e51.20 29.30, 29.20e30.00 .001
c
Total magnesium infused, h 14.90, 12.10e20.50 12.00, 12.00e12.30 .001
Magnesium sulfate on at delivery 506 (89.08) 0 (0) .001
Hours since last magnesium sulfate infusion to deliveryc 0, 0e0 169.30, 66.00e516.40 .001
Turitz et al. Proximity of magnesium exposure to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016. (continued)

trial, we evaluated the detectable effect and beta of 0.20, our study had suffi- version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC)
size in this cohort. Based on the total cient statistical power to detect a 2-fold was used for the analysis.
sample size, rate of exposure, and rate increased risk for the primary outcome This analysis was considered exempt
of outcome, assuming an alpha of 0.05 of any cerebral palsy. SAS software, by the Institutional Review Board at

508.e3 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology OCTOBER 2016


ajog.org SMFM Papers

TABLE 1
Patient characteristics by timing of magnesium sulfate exposurea (continued)
Last magnesium exposure <12 h Last magnesium exposure 12 h
Characteristics prior to delivery (n ¼ 568) prior to delivery (n ¼ 338) P value
Outcomes
Gestational age at delivery in weeksb 29.36  2.48 30.61  3.72 .001
Preterm birth (delivery <37 wks) 568 (100.00) 321 (94.97) .001
Vaginal delivery 376 (66.20) 210 (62.13) .22
Male gender 324 (57.04) 183 (54.14) .40
Birth weight, g b
1342.9  443.0 1582.6  704.4 .001
Any cerebral palsy 13 (2.29) 15 (4.44) .07
Moderate and severe cerebral palsy or death 52 (9.15) 26 (7.69) .45
a
Data are presented as percentage unless otherwise indicated; b Mean  SD; c Median (interquartile range).
Turitz et al. Proximity of magnesium exposure to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016.

Columbia University Medical Center sequential fashion, leaving a final sample hours, and 4.4% last exposed 12
because these are publicly available, of 906 infants (Figure). hours prior to delivery.
deidentified data. A total of 568 infants (62.7%) were There were significant differences
last exposed to magnesium sulfate <12 between the groups in several charac-
Results hours prior to delivery, of which 506 teristics, including education level,
Of the 2444 infants included in the (89.1%) had magnesium sulfate prenatal care, nulliparity, preeclampsia,
original trial, 1256 were exposed to pla- infusing at the time of delivery. Three antibiotic exposure, gestational age at
cebo and thus excluded. The remaining hundred thirty-eight (37.3%) were last delivery, preterm birth, and birthweight
exclusion criteria, including multiple exposed to magnesium sulfate 12 (Table 1). There were also significant
gestation, fetal anomalies, antenatal hours prior to delivery. Overall, cere- differences in the amount of magnesium
stillbirths, and missing 2 year follow-up bral palsy occurred in 28 offspring sulfate received, hours on magnesium
information, were then applied in a (3.1%), 2.3% of those last exposed <12 sulfate, whether magnesium sulfate was
infusing at delivery, and the time interval
between last magnesium sulfate expo-
TABLE 2 sure to delivery.
Adjusted odds of any cerebral palsy Adjusting for maternal race, educa-
tion level, prenatal care, nulliparity,
Variables Adjusted OR 95% CI P value preeclampsia, antibiotic exposure, total
Interval from last magnesium to birth <12 h 0.41 0.18e0.91 .03 grams of magnesium sulfate received,
Total magnesium received, g 1.01 0.99e1.03 .60 mode of delivery, gestational age at de-
Multiparity 0.99 0.43e2.30 .98
livery, and sepsis, the last exposure to
magnesium sulfate <12 hours prior to
African American race 0.61 0.27e1.39 .36 delivery was associated with a significant
Education 0.99 0.83e1.19 .91 reduction in cerebral palsy compared
Prenatal care 0.86 0.18e4.02 .85 with women last exposed 12 hours
(adjusted odds ratio, 0.41, 95% confi-
Gestational age at birth 0.96 0.94e0.99 .001
dence interval, 0.18e0.91) (Table 2).
Antibiotic exposure 0.37 0.14e0.99 .05 The decrease in cerebral palsy was not
Preeclampsia 0.001 0.001e999.99 .99 seen when assessing the time from the
Sepsis 0.67 0.24e1.87 .44 last magnesium sulfate exposure to
delivery as a continuous variable. Total
Cesarean delivery 1.94 0.88e4.25 .10
hours on magnesium sulfate and mag-
The adjusted model controls for maternal race, education level, prenatal care, nulliparity, preeclampsia, antibiotic exposure, nesium concentrations similarly did not
total grams of magnesium sulfate received, mode of delivery, gestational age at delivery, and sepsis.
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
alter our findings.
Turitz et al. Proximity of magnesium exposure to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016. Although underpowered for the
secondary outcomes, there was no

OCTOBER 2016 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 508.e4


SMFM Papers ajog.org

difference on adjusted analyses when


TABLE 3
examining moderate and severe cerebral
Adjusted odds of selected outcomes
palsy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67, 95%
confidence interval, 0.20e2.25) and Moderate/severe
moderate and severe cerebral palsy or Variable Any CP Moderate/severe CP CP or death
death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.09, 95% Interval from last magnesium to 0.41 (0.18, 0.91) 0.67 (0.20, 2.25) 1.09 (0.63, 1.87)
confidence interval, 0.63e1.87) by last delivery <12 h (aOR, 95% CI)
exposure to magnesium sulfate <12 The adjusted model controls for maternal race, education level, prenatal care, nulliparity, preeclampsia, antibiotic exposure,
hours or 12 hours prior to delivery total grams of magnesium sulfate received, mode of delivery, gestational age at delivery, and sepsis.
(Table 3). aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CP, cerebral palsy.
Turitz et al. Proximity of magnesium exposure to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016.

Comment
We found that last exposure to magne-
sium sulfate proximal to delivery (<12 exposure, our study utilized time study and by our exclusion criteria, and
hours) is associated with a reduced odds from last exposure to delivery and we were able to detect only a 2-fold
of cerebral palsy compared with more controlled for other variables related to difference. However, utilizing multi-
remote exposure. This highlights the magnesium administration. Searching center trials of this nature is important in
importance of timing of magnesium PubMed using the terms, magnesium the study of rare outcomes, such as ce-
sulfate for neuroprotection for women at sulfate, interval, and cerebral palsy, fails rebral palsy. The variables we examined
risk of preterm birth and underscores to yield any studies examining the effect were also limited by those collected in
the need for retreatment if delivery has of time interval from last magnesium the original database. Although there
not occurred after its initial administra- sulfate exposure to delivery on cerebral were some variables with missing data,
tion. A similar reduction in cerebral palsy. this was a rare occurrence.
palsy was not seen, however, when Our study had several strengths, We used any cerebral palsy as our
looking at hours from last magnesium including the prospective and rigorous primary outcome, whereas some might
sulfate exposure to delivery as a contin- collection of data at a large number argue that only moderate or severe ce-
uous variable. of sites with thorough and long-term rebral palsy are clinically significant. In
Multiple studies have proven the ef- follow-up. Information on characteris- addition, we did not include death as
ficacy of magnesium sulfate in reducing tics related to magnesium sulfate was part of our primary outcome, although it
cerebral palsy in preterm neonates. well recorded with few missing data. Our is a competing outcome. When looking
However, an optimal regimen has not exposure was clearly defined with an at moderate and severe cerebral palsy
yet been determined, with different interval of 12 hours chosen a priori to with and without death, the association
studies utilizing different bolus and differentiate the study groups. Although was no longer significant, although we
maintenance regimens.2,4-6 Because somewhat arbitrary, we chose 12 hours were underpowered for these secondary
there are both maternal and fetal because this interval is when magnesium outcomes.
concerns associated with prolonged sulfate was discontinued in the original Finally, we used 12 hours to differ-
administration of magnesium sulfate, it trial if delivery had not occurred and entiate our study groups and define a
is important to determine the precise was no longer considered imminent, and short vs long interval between last
amount of medication required to be therefore, some women may not have magnesium sulfate infusion and de-
effective. been retreated after an initial exposure livery. There were differences between
McPherson et al7 evaluated the asso- to magnesium sulfate.2 our 2 study groups, such as earlier
ciation between the duration of magne- Using a shorter time interval to gestational age at delivery, that could
sium sulfate infusion with cerebral palsy differentiate our study groups would explain why last exposure to magne-
or death and found no difference be- diminish our ability to detect a difference sium within 12 hours of delivery was
tween exposure <12 hours (reference in effect, whereas a longer interval would significant only on multivariable anal-
group), between 12 and 18 hours have decreased our sample size. Further- ysis. Because the decrease in cerebral
(adjusted odds ratio, 1.03, 95% confi- more, using a continuous outcome would palsy was not seen when assessing time
dence interval, 0.60e1.77), or >18 be scientifically interesting but not clini- from last magnesium sulfate to de-
hours (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08, 95% cally relevant. Our primary and second- livery as a continuous variable, the
confidence interval, 0.57e2.03) with ary outcomes were also clearly defined exact time interval with which mag-
similar maternal adverse drug affects and and were validated by blinded and certi- nesium sulfate confers the maximum
neonatal morbidities. fied pediatricians and pediatric neurolo- benefit in cerebral palsy reduction
Although those investigators defined gists at a 2 year follow-up point. remains unknown.
their exposure groups based on total A limitation of our study was that our Although magnesium sulfate remains
duration in hours of magnesium sulfate sample size was fixed both by the parent the standard of care for women at

508.e5 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology OCTOBER 2016


ajog.org SMFM Papers

imminent risk of preterm birth for References health outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol
neuroprotection, much remains un- 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2002;186:1111-8.
Data and statistics for cerebral palsy. Available 7. McPherson JA, Rouse DJ, Grobman WA,
known about its optimal administration. Palatnik A, Stamilio DM. Association of duration
Based on our findings, the timing of at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/cp/data.html.
Accessed June 12, 2015. of neuroprotective magnesium sulfate infusion
magnesium sulfate administration ap- 2. Rouse DJ, Hirtz DG, Thom E, et al. with neonatal and maternal outcomes. Obstet
pears to play an important role in A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium Gynecol 2014;124:749-55.
reducing the risk of cerebral palsy. sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy.
Previous exposure to magnesium N Engl J Med 2008;359:895-905.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gy- Author and article information
sulfate >12 hours from delivery should From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Depart-
necologists. Magnesium sulfate before antici-
not negate the need to retreat women pated preterm birth for neuroprotection. ment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University
who again appear to be at imminent risk Committee opinion no. 455. Obstet Gynecol Medical Center, New York, NY.
of delivery. Future work should further 2010;116:669-71. Received March 3, 2016; revised April 25, 2016;
4. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Doyle LW, Haslam RR. accepted May 3, 2016.
delineate the optimal characteristics of
Australasian Collaborative Trial of Magnesium The views expressed herein are those of the authors
magnesium sulfate administration to and do not represent the views of the Eunice Kennedy
Suphate (ACTOMg SO4) Collaborative Group.
provide maximum benefit with minimal Effect of magnesium sulfate given for neuro- Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human
medication. n protection before preterm birth: a randomized Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network or
controlled trial. JAMA 2003;290:2669-76. the National Institutes of Health.
5. Marret S, Marpeau L, Zupan-Simunek V, et al. The authors report no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment Magnesium sulphate given before very preterm Presented as a poster (number 696) entitled “The effect
We thank the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National birth to protect infant brain: the randomized of magnesium sulfate remote from delivery on cerebral
Institute of Child Health and Human Develop- controlled PREMAG trial. BJOG 2007;114:310-8. palsy” at the 34th annual meeting of the Society of
ment, the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units 6. Mittendorf R, Dambrosia J, Pryde PG, et al. Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Atlanta, GA, Feb. 1e6, 2016.
Network, and the Protocol Subcommittee for Association between the use of antenatal mag- Corresponding author: Amy L. Turitz, MD. alt2153@
making this database publicly available. nesium sulfate in preterm labor and adverse cumc.columbia.edu

OCTOBER 2016 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 508.e6

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen