APPENDIX B First Engh, Trasaation of V. 1. LENIN: ABSTRACT OF HEGEL'S SCIENCE OF Logic Translators Note: This Abstract of Hegets Science of Logie isthe ental pat of Lenin's Philosophical Notebooks, Lenin wrote these comments a he was reading and copying many sections of eget Werke in 1914. The Abarat was fin published fn, Ros sian ia the Lenin Miscelany, Volume IX,-by the Mars Eages: Lenin teat in 1989. The Philowphic Notebooks were the published asa wepacate volume and ft it trom the 1917 edion by the tnstewe thatthe present translation ts made, ‘This translation does nol facade the extrac trom Hegel ‘The tanslator merely indicates slonaide which pasage in Hegel Lenin wrote his comments He vied the 1889 elton of Heyes ‘Werke, publsed in Berls. The pages ct in the present tons. Jaton, however refer not tothe elton Lenin used, bt to the ‘ages ‘in the standard "English translation of gels Seence of Logic by W. H, Johnson and I. G, Stuthers (New York The Macmillan Company, 1928 and 1951; London: George Allen & Unwin, Lid, 1951, The present transistor har excerpted the eater part of thee comments, and fat alo included few excepts from Lenin's comments on Hegel's other works Encyclo and the History of Philosophy. These were frst published in the Lenin Miscellony, Vol. Xi, 1980, and republished in the above: Inentioned 1947 edition. RD. (Wotume 1, page 456) Logie isthe doctrine not of external tors of thought but ofthe lave of de velopment “ofall materia, natural and Jpirtoat things.” fe, of the develop ment of the toil, coneete content of the world and of ie Anowledge. Le, the rele, sum, conclusion of the his tory of the knowledge of the word (Wolume 1, page 46) How should one understand ahi ‘Manis faced with a web of the phe- Jnomens of mare, Inwincive mh 3 esvage, does not separate himself trom| ature. Conscious man daw out cate pores, he exence of the ne of separ ion, i the kneledge af the wort, the nodal pola in the web which en [pS Nin denon od mer Te (Volume 3, page 66) ge poses two fundamental premises: 1) he necenity of connection 2) the immanent origination of di | Very iemporeanitt This ie what i eana in my opinion 1) Necessary is the connection, ibe objective connection af all sien ores, tendencls ee of the gven sphere or phenomena Fie Wai Sherine wate ll ane and pags nee ae 0 Megs ine of giMaxis ano paesDon 2) “the bamanent origination of di lincions"=the inner, objective logic of the evolution of the struggle othe iainetins in a pols. (Wolume 1, page 67) + 1 not this the thought, that appear lance is also objective, lace itt one lof the espects of the objective world? [Not only Ewen, but aio Appearance lbjecive. ven the aatincion between jubjectve and objective hati init, (Wolume t page 69) 1 Ce capt ‘A beso formola: “not § eve ab lence” univena, but ssniveral whieh comprise in Ise the wealth of particu ae favidua, separate (al the wealth lot the parceular and separate) Tres ica (Volume 1; page 185) alectte's the doctrine of she identity of opporiter-tow they an be and ow they become under which ‘conditions they become dential, eransforming one into the why the mind of fan sist not take thee opposites ior den, but for ving, cnditoned, mobile tinarme ing one into the other. En lient Hegel (Volume 1, page 142 )Aeaie and profound Hegel anaiyas Joncepts whic unsllyappesrdend, and Ihe shows” tha there’ if movement in them. The fit? That means, move iment hae come to an end! Something? "thse meant not what Other ike Being in genersl—Taat mean such fn ldeerainatenes that being™=Not Being Allsided universal flexibility of concep tlesbiiy reaching wo the idemity of lopposite~“That ithe estene. ‘This exibiliy, subjectively appied-eclect ‘dum and tophinty, Wheat thi lexi is ebjectively applied, ie, reflect, the atsidednes ofthe materi proce and] es unity. hen iti tectiey fi the leone flection of the eternal develop inert a the word (Volume 1, pages 1736) |The es ofthe wansformation of ideal inco the reals profound. Very important fr htory. But alo in the peronal life of man itis evident that here is mach truth In hie Agent elgar materialism. NB. "The Jot the ideal from the material i alo Int uncondtinal, not excise: (Wolume 1 page 182) | Beidenaly eget draws Bis aldol lopment of concept, of categories, frm| the whole history of phlowphy, This sive yet 2 new side tothe whole of the leoee(Votan 1 pag 1869 (vette, pag 670) Ine Obst, ab verre oberon $ (End of Cup 2 Hegel rng in cy ample he co Wook fe he Lop Law of ct nach here fron Coat St iat ep sec Neto Ciorenen nd “etfmovemen Strrtin,Hetach Wonk g) (iio 3bt aay independent pos Lena stew teary mere) I eruption ogden aang” noencn e s tpl rine of eer ltmoremet tape fate? (rte) movement ne Frther: Tanon of Helog to Bs thgr-Sppatte ot dead belages sce aaje ay sey Wawel tlre tat hs the oe” nl af Yluce tr reget of ste sed 08 Sine lite suri) Hagen (otme page sit) I's nae to ele teen | “Thus ere also Hegel aca Kan ot subjection. ‘This NB. Hegel i or the “objective vlidiy” even veri) Engels have’ done ot ahow, “of che immediate given” (he "The idea of univerial mrement and term, given, i eommon with Hegel in ange (18, Legie) was diconed be- general) The lle philosophers dispot fore its application to life and society. whether one should take ar bai enence vas proclsme in reference vo society or the ivmedinely given. (Kan, Hine, (QB) earlier than i relation 46a Jil Mache), Hegel subwivote “and ieee fr “on” and expinine the concrete con ent of thie “an to save to elese, to poly this herel Sohich is preciely ‘what Manx. and owe alee soc ce cht, but eae a nace Jot the tention of one to the ser, Madi. ‘this iz the mort impor | TTR i very profound and woe Brey feni concrete tag. every corte oeting @ Ieliget refi and mind In diver nd often contain Retecion gps the conan, ex to all othe, eo, i ist prenes brings ting In relstion to snd others ene shother, compris the "eoncept 0 ‘ale of the egy tin etd wt He ld Rok vate atin of ear te "The reece Kant Cie of udp “Fhe lence the Coma este Ts “Te tee ito the Og of fedMARXISM AXD FREEDOM shine ehrough the contradiction” but) does not express the concept ot things| land ther relation. (8) Thinkiog reason (Mind) sharpens the blunted aference ‘ol vateny. the mere manilld of imagination, to the etentil diferene, to Opposition. Only when the coatradicsions reach the peak doc, manifeldednewecxme regular (regu) and lively In relation 13 the etheracquie that negnvty which ihe inner pulsation of sel} Imovement and life (Wolume. 1, pages 9594) ‘The wanslon free Ground into condition. HE Yim not minaken, there jt euch ising connection of everything with everything ce, and of the reflection of his connectonsanding Hegel ‘on his feet-in the con Jxpt of man, which mut be xo poised, brokenin, flexible, mail, relative, mu ullytiedn, untied in opponion, a2 to embrace the world, The continua Jot the work of eget and Marx must eons inthe diaetcal working ot of the haeory of human thought, since, and technology. (Wolume 1, page 108) ‘When all the Condicions af a Fact are present, centers fo xienc.” | Very good Wise have the Abraiue| [ides sea Ideals to do with thie) TRemanlable this "aervation™ = lexisence | (Wotume 1, pages 181182) (NB Law i the penitent (emsiniog) in appearance, Tae i the idence in appesrance NB Lawethe quiescent reflection i ap- os Phir vemavlably matralaie an remarkably pain (in » word, "que lent) determination, Law take the qu Jecent-and therefore aw, every law i narrow, incomplete, an approtimation, (Wolume th page 140) |The esencr fr hat both the World af Appesrance and the world which i ia set ze exentally moments of shel knowledge ‘of ‘mauute by man, sep, ehanges in (oe deepening of knowledge The shit of the world in Hel ever far ther and futher from the world of ape pearance what isnot yet wivble In Hegel NB, Do no the “moments” of notion with Hegel have the sigoitiance "moments" of transition?(Wotume 1, pager 178187) Section Thre, Actual Regarding the question of “Posi fig” Hegel nous the emptiness of (hia fategory and in the Encyclopedias, “Whether 8 thing is powible or im ponible depends aligetter on the sub. Jet matter chat Uy om the som cot of the elements in Actoality which a8 it pens iel ou, coves elf to Be 2 eee ? “The tum tol ofthe elements in oc exatity, which as it-opens felt out, discos ell w be a nec.” ‘The unloldment ofthe whole totity ot moment of actuality NB=ewence of sitet knowledge, (Welome 1, page 102) — | ‘On the ane hand, we mont depen te Inowledge of matter to dhe knowledge (othe notion) of sabatance in oder fo find the causes of appearance, On the) lther hand, actual Knowledge of cases is the deepening of Knowledge trom | externally of appearance to sibalance, ‘Two wpe of examples shoul expan | thie I} ove of the history of ator iciences, and 2) from the Bistry of phil The tenes Io Tie Hapelpcte of the Piaopia Seen, ‘te eopintoa’ atc, y cs We Sct Thy Lago Hegel ot ad piel in Tk Ldn and No Set nin Gait ra ge tetera tence heat cet SHES chin ehh ea Laon “Te Seer Lge Pe jsopiy. Atare precy: not “examples” comparison wet pos raion but the auintewence of the one and the ether Pls dhe history of technology. ‘Caw and elle, ergo, only momen Jot every bind of interdependence, cn nection’ (ofthe univenal, the conete | nation of events are only links in the| [st of whet deeopnent of mates. | (Volume 1, page 198) Ne ‘Allsideines and allenbacng char acer of world eonsection afe only on dey, desslarity and incompleely ex prened by canal (Wotume i, page 195) is the ideas, myst but very pro fou indeton ato the hore eas ot evens Hegel ally leads up to history nde causliey and 1,000 times more leeply sid richly undercande casa ta the zone of te “ened” now (Volume 1, page 197) . What we ordinarily undersandby| [Causality sony a smal att of the un versal connection, but (+ materiale sition) the small parti not wsbjecive ut the objectively eal ‘eonnecton.(Wotume 1, page 204) ‘When you read Hegel on Gausaiey | seers srange afr sight why he stops Jo comparatively briliy om this thesme loved by the Kantans, Why? Because for nim causality i only one’ of the deter tions of the univer connection, | which he has earlier gaiped In 4c eepér and alleided maner, in alli Jdevelopmene, has from the very begin ning and aly: emphasned tis connec tion. Geciprocal transitions, ee tek would be very instructive 10 pt slong: Ide ofthe “travail” af neoempircim | (Gepeaives phys idealiaa) the de Jekions, more accurately, he, diletc method of Hegel. (Volume 1, page 208) At the end of Book Il ofthe Logic, before the tranuion to the Notion, 3 Aetiniion Is given! “the Notion, the realm of Subjectivity or of Freedom’ (Volume 11, pages 221-222) Book Three: Subjective Logic The Doctrine oft Hegel eae compleely vig lgains Kent. Thought, emerging frm the conrete to the abstract, does nat ep ratenif Ils correct (NB) (and Kant, Not TF Fie eed eect appa fn gl Lei exits tke all philosophers, speaks about coe ree thinking)from truth, but goes toward it Abstraction of mater, of mat grat law, absuraction of value, tes in [2 werd, all scentife (corset, serious not nonsensical not absurd) seein retlect nature tore deeply, ely, [uly from tUving abseration to abr thinking, and from this fo practice such isthe aisecti rosd to Anoledge af truth, the Knowledge of objecive re: lity. Kent degrades nowledge in ondet to make place for belie: Hegel eleva hnowedge, believing thac knowledge it knowledge of God, The materialist ele Hates knowledge of matter of nature, teowing God and she philaphic rab be defending Hi tv. he dng | (otume I, page 224) [Hise wo Hegel exenily igh; eave i » category which i "develd of |e Sato sensual” but eis trger tan the Taw of sopply and. demand JOnly Hegel isan ideal therefore the of “conaitative” ee (Volume 11, pages 238800) Section One: Subjectivity ‘The dislecte of movement of "No-- Alon" om purely “ormal™ notion at the beginningto the Judgment, then to Spllogsm spd lnaly 10 teaaformation, from subjectivity of notion to li Ob. ject, Fine diaineive characteriie of mo- tion—Univeralty, NB? Notion came rycout of Esence, which came ont of Ber ing. ‘The further development of Unive salty, Particutarity and Individuality is abstract and a struc in the highest degre, te tirent; | Kuno Richer explains thew “ab fe eee et suse” arguments very poorly taking iat 'et |e easier examples trom the Eneyclopae ese ri adding. nonsense (agit the SSE." Mt TFrendi Revolution. Kuno Fischer, Vl. 8. 1901, p. 580, etc, but he docs not show the reader how w search for the fey vo the dificult wataitons, shade, overflows, bbs of the Hegelian abstract Fa wa] tte ee owt porn aso forall for ‘Hegel ix to mark the (ramet Hes tet And] levoms, Brom 3 certsin point of view, feat sting] [under certain conditions the universal tian is the particular, the particalar fe the fom} |universt. Not only (1) the connection, and an indiwoluble connection, of all notions and judgment, but (2) tana vats an a: {ions af ome int the ether, and not only lnndance"" de unston, but also (8) identity ef op “fetinidant” [poster This i what is important to| eo Sek feet. But this only “plerees through rc ten dae int of analyte of the “arcs ie tagtt" “seus The history of though fom the point of view of development and appli feation of univeral notions and cate ores of the Logic~voila ce quil fut! (Wolume M, page 807) AIL things ore = Syllogimm "ND Hegel's nals of the Spllogims (42-0, “individual, particular, univer: ‘3 PLU, ete) i reminiscent of Mars’ imitation of Hegel In Chapter 1 (Wotume 1, page 800) “The forming of (abrirac) notions and | 8 tier uuletion already include the pre nation, the conviction, the com lseiousness of the law of the objec tive world connections Ie i abrurd to single out cuality oom this Tei possible to eject the objectivity of no tows, the objectivity of the univer in ke parcalar and in the Individual, (Consequently, Hegel. considerably more profoundly than Kant and others, in esigates the reflection of the move ment of the objective world inthe move | ment of notions, ist a6 the simple valde form, the indviduat set of exchange of 2 given Jeommodity ‘with snothen. already in cludes. In undeveloped form, all major leontradictons af eaptalism.—so the implest_generaliation, the fir and| simples forming of notions (judgments logis, ec) signltes the ever deeper Knowledge of the objective workl con nections. Ie ie necenary here to seek the real sense, signifiance and role of Hegelian Logic. This NB nificance at Shae aie oo ea ap Soot ge ie” ‘spied the dae |[MARXISM AND EREEDOBE | Reig te | “Tso aphovinaos vation fe | 1) Plekhanor riiies Kantanism caper Kon | (294 agnonticinm in general) more frm fant each: |the vulgar materiale than the dialee Thus lee materialise point of view, insofar 88 he only @ limine rejects their argo mentation and does aot corzet them (a Hegel corrected Kang by. deepening, acneraliing, broadening them, showin fhe connections and trans ij.om. ofall and esery potion. (Qi Buchnerin), chan in a Hegel, | nd sms move in a Fevrbacln (Volume 1, page 825) 2 1 imposible fully rasp Marx's Capital, nd expecially i ist chapter, i€ you have not satied| through ad understood the whale of Hegel's. Logie. Conmequently, none of the Masts forthe pat 4 century bave understood Marx! | Tegel actually demonstrated that he [itm tsa aeons | fiir war's sean toe eee fel Nove precy, id ot dees | Vie, br ined en Very profound aml wil The law lot logic ate te reflection of the objec tive in the subjective conscious of (Volume 11, pages 48398) Section Two. Objectivity (Volume 1, page $80) Morals dialectic The lve ofthe exer woof estore, ihe scons of ec haw tm sad Chem tem (his ery ie portant) are the ass of the fovlly ee aay af ma Invhs pecs vy man has be fore hi he bv word depends on and hs sev sete yt om thi pits of temo point praca en peti) ney etman, he mechan and he chen fe) cunty ofthe wold ft nates) pean at toceing eee seo ey he, 2 forms ofthe Obesity of he poe est natte_(mechonel and chee indenting actviy of man The enon he tT sa ot Iman acer at fi allen” her’) ta isto onan. Coatonace ot [man of sence naton) rls eo enc the sotto anureat ke tame vine ti conaounc ee calf elaionp to mare (or once, no spi coin win MECHANICAL AND ‘CHEMICAL TECHNIQUE PRECISELY FOR THIS REASON SERVES “THE. AIMS OF IMENTS CHARACTER. ESSENCE) [Consists iw rite race THAT I? 1S DETERMINED. BY EXTERNAL [CONDITIONS (LAWS OF NATURE} on(Wotume 11, pages 8618) In rely the aims of man are gen raed by the objective world and pre suppose it, Gnd iar dhe given, existent, Dut ie appears to man that his sims are taken ouside of the world, independent of the world ("eee") ((NBE A this relates tothe “Subjee tive End” NB)) {Wolume 1, pages 38738) "solar a the Mesos it higher than the finite Ends of external ineFlnes S the’pleugh is more honorable than are i inediy thse enoymcns tt ore procuted by it, and ate Ends, The in Strument is preserved, while the imme {isu enjoymente pa away and ate for: gotten. In his Toole man poses poser lover» external NATURE, EVEN THOUGH, ACCORDING ‘TO HIS ENDS, leetjuenty abject to it"® \ \ (Volume 1, pages 386394) AU thie in "he Rested End.” _t | Historia materia ir one of the ‘applications and developments of the idea of genius which, in seed, fn em Inyo, are woe found in Hegel When Hegel iermsometimes even strains hitselt and worviee to dent fo subsume the purpoiful activity of san under the eateries of lgi. sping that dhisatvity isthe “syllogism,” that the subject plays the role of tome sort lot smember* in the logical “figure” of he syllogism, ete, then thi is not only stain, not onty'a game, There i here E: very deep content, purely materialist I is necessary to warn this around: The| pracical activity of man, repeated i ons of times, muse lad the coneclou| nes of man ao the repetition ofthe var lous logical igures in order that these Jin achieve the sigulicince of in axiom ‘This nota bene, TRemarkabler Hegel goes Urongh We practical, end positing aciviey of mam, fo get co the "Idea" 4 correspondence ofthe notion with he objec tothe Ides truth. A elose approach ta this, tha nan by his practice demonstrated. the objective correcness of his ess, no tions. Knowledge, science (Wolume 1 pages 895.486) Section I The Idea (Wotume 1, pager 385-400 i generil the intoduction to The Idea of Part Hof the Logic (Subjective Logic) and the corresponding pars graphs in the Bnojlopaedia is nearly the very best desription of the dialete {I} se sa We | I ha.X Here, chen, the correspondence, 10 t0 speak, of loge and gnoseology it demon strated in remarkably inspired ane (Volume 11, pager 399400) ea (ead: knowledge of man) isthe correspondence (Conformance) of the notion and objectivity (“he univers). This fly. Secondly, the Idea Ue the relationship of sabjeaivity (man) existing for Ie sell (as I independent) to objectivity distinct (Geom this ides Subjeeiviy is he arising to abalsh thisseparation (of ides from the object. Knowledge i's proces of submersion fn faorganie natute. (of sind) for the sake of subordinating to it the power of {he subject and. generalization (of the nowledge of the univers in phenom: ena) + Conespondence of thought With ‘he object it 8 procen. Thought (Sivan) must nor prevent to ill thought inthe form of a dead repone, inthe form ofa simple picture (image) of the pale” (pent) thought, without Fmpulte or motign, a gen a number, an sheracton. Knowledge is eternal, infinite ap proachment of thought to object. The Fellection of nature in the thought of [man must be uadertood not in ‘den, not in an “abstract” manner, | not without motion, not without con| redictons, but in-an eternal proces of lmovement, emergence of contradictions sn ther solution i (Ercyetopeedio, pages 802-4) The totality ofall sides of a phe nomenon, of actslity and thei (mu fal) relation-this i+ out of what uth is formed. Relations (<= wana-| “tity St tons-scontradictions) of notions==the| lect po Inain content of loge. and. moreover| "™P hee nodosa thir Flog, ae sions, contradictions) are show “| econs of he objecive word. The alecie of things ereater the dale cof Hea, and no the vee #0ne mus expres hiv aphorizn more] Feseigety popularly without the word, dtc: | Sted Sed wh ths: “Hegel bllisnely guested in change, inthe intertelatoi of #11 we tlons inthe identity of opponte, i the framitions of one notion into another In eueraal change, of movement of no" tions uit. such relation of things, of [cowie ithout exception trmidon of ences of ene tno the} | ga Jotier “Zot alt > without exception] |e relativity ofthe opponiian between con| ee} cepts. Henty of opposition: “ tween concepts Fitum ies Ere aaj rece aad hee Encyclopedia, pager 8825) Tea "wal (paragraph 218), The ea, hey uth at a procesbecnse| lwuth ies procersgocs dhrough thet steps in its development: lite: 2) proc loss of hrowlege, inching practice of man and technique (ee above: §) he ep ofthe alsolute idea (ie, fll uth, Tile gives iets to brain, Nature i reliected in the brain of man. Aah, by veriling and applying jn pracle| and in technique the coreenes ofthese ellcions, arrives at objective. tut, (Encyetopeeia, pages 360861) "The Tnorganie aaturé which fo ae by dhe vital agent sullers tis fate, because iis wireully the same at what ite is actualy” Convenely==pure messin Sper id profound, el And also NB: dem. lnnsiates the extreme correcnes of the terme "in ill” and "lor deel 111 (Wolume 11, page 429) |The logics wodons are sbjecive vo], long as they remain “abstract.” in thei strat form, and atthe same time ex press also the thingindwsell. Nature and Jeoheretenest and abrtractnes ond phe Jnomenon and enence end moment and Jeelnton. Mans cognition Is subjective nts abstracnes and separatenes but objective as a whole, in the proce, in the result inthe tendency inthe souree (Wotume I, page 460) ‘Theoretic cognition must give the object in its neces, in ia allaided elation, in its coneadicory movement lin and for iuelt. But a's understand ing “definitively” grasp this objective uth of cognition, dacernw it, masters it only when cogation becomes "being for isi” in the sense of practic, the practice of an and humanity isthe vetifcation, criterion of objectivity of knowledge that the thought of Hege| Ose must retsen het All this is in the chapter on “The Ides of Cognition” (Chapter 1) in the transition to "The Abeolute Iden" (Chapter 11), ke, undoubtedly practice in Hoge stands a2 Uink ju the ana | ‘is of the proces of cognition snd pre luely a6 9 transition to the objective (Cabsolute.” according to Hege) truth Nar consequently, clings to Hegel, in eroducing erteria Sf practice Into he theory of nowedge. Cl. Theser on Fewerbech Practice in the theory of cognition Bis Mans ‘cognition not only te ects she objecive wold, but cess fe bie Suey[seends its determinatenest (Wolume H, page 468) “Syllogim of action.” For Hegel a Kon, practice is the logical can: Jtwstomal te figure cf loge. And tis is true OF course, notin the sense that the figure of logic has by He Othernes the practice of man. (abiolute ideal im but vce versa: the practice of man, repeated billions of time, fastens isl in the consiournen of man by the fig es oflogle The figures have the slid ty of prejudice, an axiomatic charac ter precisely (and only) Because of this bition times repetion Ist postulate: good End (wbjectve sim) versus actuality (‘external acon iy) ‘2nd postulate ony (bfeciviy) Sd postulate: namely, the conclusion the corespondence of subject and ob ict the verification of tubjectveidenn, the ceteris of objective tr external means (weap: (Wolume 11, page 468) ‘The aciviy of man, composing fr vet an objective picture of the world changes the external activity, tran changes there oF other af iu aspect, qualities) and thas takes away from tthe wate of show, externality and mulls gives it beinginitelt and for ivell” (objec ive truth. (Wotume 11, pages 466486) (Chapter 11, “The Absolute ea" (Volume 11, page 466) ‘The unley of theoretic idest_ (ogni Mion) and. prectice-this NB-and this unity precively # of kno) theory 1 Ted ge forthe rele the "Absolute Iden” (and Wea--abjective ruth. (Wolume 11, page 478) ‘We can, if you pleste, prevent there elements of the dialectic in 8 more de talled way, thar 1) The objectivity of the anal] ems ot duis (not examples, nce digression, but|) de dake. the ehing In fuel 2) The whole totality ofthe manifold relations of this thing tothe other. 3) The development of iis ting (epectve appearance, Its wn “) The ineraally contradictory tem deneies (and sides) of this thing 5) The at sum and unity of opp 0) The thing. (dhe appearance, ee) struggle respective dhe! snfolding of these oppoites, the con taaicon of the implies, ete 1) The unity of analy Ssmdisintegration ‘ofthe parcolar gr ess {here parts together respeine” ee Engh in Leni veJ 8) The relation of each thing (ap pessance ee) is not only manifold but several, universal. Each thing (appear Poce, proces ete) & conneced with every other. 8) Not only unity of opposites but transitions of very determination, sualicy, characters de lature into every other (ito it opposite, 10) Infinite proces of unfolding of nw sey, relation, te 1) Sntinite proces ofthe deepening Jo man's cognition of things, appear ances, proce, et, from appearance to Jesence, and trem the lew profound to the more profound exenc. 12) From coenivtencet causality atl trom one form of connection and of sal dependence"to another, deeper and more univer. 13) The repedtion at a higher sage Jot ceain fentures, characterise, tes ofthe lower, and 11) The apparent setura to the old (ihe negation of the nega Fon. 15) The struggle of the content with te form and the reverse, The sledding Jot he form, the uantrmation ofthe 16) The transition of quantity into ality and ice vers. ((18 and 16 are Vesper of )) rielly the dtetic can be defined 2 the doctrine ofthe wnity of opposites. [Thereby i the Kernel of the dialectic Jerasped, bus that demands explanation and evelopment (Wetume Further these follows an interesting, leat, important shetch of dialectic, ages 478474) (Woluee 11, page 478) Noc a bare nagadon, not a random tion, nota septice! negation, vii lation, ube, which ie characteris sed existent in the diaecie-whih, on |doubcedly, contains intel the element lof negation and asthe most important clement at thit—no, buts negation 3 8 moment af connection, a8 2 moment Jor develogeent, retaining the postive, ke, without any vacation, withovt any | eclectic | Here i wht is importants 1) the characteristic of the datectic: témovement, source of activity, move iment of lie and spite; correspondence Jot motions of the aubject maa) with reali 2) objectivim to the highest degree (the most objective momen)|] (Volume 1, page 485 Logie the history of hough mat, in ti tm el] This pra om the lst page of the ener and a2 wot, contespand with sehtigt | cope exrardniy enanhble The he aw f though f, Post uanidon ofthe logit Hes to nature Sine tl Seco s hand to mae. ge TE Stam ai olen? Loge Guha Ere oot i whe he ad atthe ten pital leur. he lee the lpi of Cop. (Saha wal fot Hegel & mites orned opade al, and his should be especially wt . iy SN owe Ti es ple of ised on the given question’ in copia boi Wut wh flows w ee ead of tie tog dita od theory f ow! he page ent importan. edge of matron (8 words are not ll enelor the Logie, December 17, 1914. necessary: dhey are one and the sane)| |e applied to one cence, taking all that i valuable fm Hegel and moving it forward, Supplementary Quotations trom the Encyelopaedia (pages 364819) Plan ofthe Dilectc, (Logie) Consents Page of the Smaller Logie” (Encylo- Commodtey-money-cpltl pee) et —— _ -—___ “production of absolute surplus value Cognition (anowiedge) in Being Ga . is cue immediate phenortens) revels the > prouctin of relative surplus value essence (ay of cause, hlentiy fer _ ence, te) -such actually the wn iver ‘The history of capitan. and the [ial course of ll of man's tnowicage 7 (otal ot sene) in general Suc the eve ieeneuons manic oune ako of natural reience 1h land potitical ecomomy (and — ot history). So precisely isthe dialectic f| ‘The beginning-ihe most simple, or > Hegel the generalizaton of the history inary, obvious, immediate "being": an ramen individual commodity. ("being” in po Eecemely productive seems to be the] y Titial ecomomy es sali a 2 socal Jent wr fated hs heey nae oe a relation. The amass ie» dual one, dex ‘etely, in greater detail, regarding the) ‘doce and inductive,logieal and is [fis oy Snaieuct wetter te el torial (ors of valve), Veilction of Gets respective? the practice fs hese fn every sep ofthe analysis, vo ta a ie phe el "The Bplh word “rapes ein tenis extoTrCL regarding the question sbout ex sence vers appearance “price and value Alemand and supply versus “value” (Cvertalied Inbor?) wages and pice of nbor power Excerpts from Lenin’ Abstract of Hegel History of Philosphy Intelligent eatin is neater to peligene materialism than is stupid ma terials. Dialectica idealist instead of ice |gent: metaphysical, undeveloped, dead, Wulgu, sate, instead of api. Plethanoy wrote probably neatly 100 page (Delon + yaa Bogdan + again Randans “bast questo cst on plilnpty (set) “Thee fi them mi abou he Barger Logie fu houphs ex dsenie prop Jest prophet) a! Arishoue' eiique of “the Hess” of rico. is s. etique ‘of eal lideatiom in generat: decane wherever” notions, abatactions at, there are also "he la,” and "neces. fe, The idealit Hegel in a cowardly fashion goes around the face that Ari: totle (in his crtcimm of the Ideas of Plat) undermined the foundations of eats, ‘Materialism i always dhe vitor when ‘me idealist critica the foundations lof another idealist. Cl Arid vs Plate ete. Hegel versus Kan, ete Hegel, the adherent of the dialectic, Jas ineapable'of understanding diatee tically the transition from tater. fo Imovement, from mae to consciousness [especially the second, ‘Mare corrected the mistake (or wea nes of the myst i: Se thou