P.A.

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
(A Unit of P.A. Educational Trust, Mangalore)
Approved by AICTE, Affiliated to VTU
Recognized by the Govt. of Karnataka, Certified to ISO 9001-2008

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND

ELECTRONIS ENGINEERING

FACULTY DIARY – PART B

SUBJECT NAME: MUHAMMAD SAIFUDDEEN

SUBJECT CODE: 15EE34

NAME MUHAMMAD SAIFUDDEEN

DESIGNATION ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

ACADEMIC YEAR 2016-17 ODD SEM

& SEMESTER

ALLOTTED CLASS 3EE

 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

CONTENTS
Sl. Page Department Institute
No Contents Number Level Level
Verification Verification
PART B
6. ASSESSMENT TOOLS
6.1 STUDENT DETAILS
6.2. ATTAINMENT LEVELS
6.2.1 Direct Assessment (Exams)
6.2.2 Indirect Assessment (Feedback)
6.3 ASSESSMENT TOOLS
6.3.1 DIRECT ASSESSMENT
a. Bloom Taxonomy Level (BTL)
b. I Internal Assessment Question paper
c. I Internal Assessment Scheme of Evaluation
d. II Internal Assessment Question paper
e II Internal Assessment Scheme of Evaluation
f. III Internal Assessment Question paper
g III Internal Assessment Scheme of Evaluation
h. University Examination Question Paper
6.3.2 INDIRECT ASSESSMENT
a. Corse Feedback after I internal
b. Course Feedback after II internal
c. Course Feedback after III internal
d. Course Exit Survey
7 COURSE ASSESSMENT DATA
7.1 Direct Assessment Data
7.2 Indirect Assessment Data
8 COURSE ATTAINMENT
8.1 Course Assessment –Direct
8.1.1 Course attainment- I internal
8.1.2 Course attainment- II internal
8.1.3 Course attainment- III internal
8.1.6 Overall Course attainment- VTU exam
8.2 Course Assessment –Indirect
8.3 Average Attainment Level(ATR)
9 COs versus POs/PSOs mapping
10 FACULTY- SELF APPRAISAL

1
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

6. ASSESSMENT TOOLS
6.1 Student Details
Sl. USN Students Name Academic details Remarks

No PUC/ CET CO VTU Semester aggregate

10+2 rank ME
Exam D-K I II III I V VI VII VIII

% Ran V

1 ABHISHEK V S

2 CHETHAN V K

52
3 YOGEESH NAYAK T

4 4PA14EE005 MD FARIYAD

5 4PA14EE012 MUHAMMED SHANU

4PA15EE002 85.00
6 ABHISHEK BEKAL

76.166 152
7 4PA15EE003 ADARSH T

75.00 190 186

8 4PA15EE004 AJAY PRAKASH

84.00 172 184

9 4PA15EE005 ASHWINI M PUJAR

10 4PA15EE006 GOWRISH K

JAYAKRISHNAN 85.43
11 4PA15EE008
NAMBOOTHIRI PN
MAHAMMAD 58.00 58
12 4PA15EE010
NAUSHAD
13 4PA15EE011 MINHAJ KAZI 66.00 146

14 4PA15EE012 MOHAMMA SINAN P 82.3 212 194

MOHAMMAD YASEEN 72.00 174
15 4PA15EE013
P
16 4PA15EE016 NOOR MOHAMMED CC 152

17 4PA15EE018 SACHIN K KHARVI 72.00 34

18 4PA15EE019 SUNEER K C 68.00 6.2 6.7

19 4PA15EE020 SURAJ NAIK 76.00 5 5.5

Signature of the Course Coordinator Signature of the HOD

2
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

6.2 ATTAINMENT LEVELS
6.2.1 DIRECT ASSESSMENT

Attainment Condition Note

Levels
Level 1 If % of marks secured is from 40% to 49.9%
Level 2 If % of marks secured is from 50% to 59.9%
Level 3 If % of marks secured is equal to 60% to 69.9%
Level 4 If % of marks secured is equal to 70% to 79.9%
Level 5 If % of marks secured is equal to 80% and above

Justification for setting the levels:

6.2.2 Indirect assessment

Attainment Condition Note
Levels
Level 1 Below Average
Level 2 Average
Level 3 Good
Level 4 Very Good
Level 5 Excellent

Justification for setting the levels:

Signature of the Course Coordinator Signature of the HOD

3
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

6.3 ASSESSMENT TOOLS
6.3.1 Internal Assessment Exams
a. Blooms Taxonomy Level (BTL)
BTL BTL1. BTL2 BTL3 BTL4 BTL5 BTL6
Definition Remembering Understanding Applying Analyzing Evaluating Creating
Bloom’s Exhibit Demonstrate Solve problems Examine and Present and Compile
Definition memory of understanding To new break defend information
previously of facts and situations information opinions by together in a
learned ideas by by applying into parts by making different
material by organizing, acquired identifying judgments way by
recalling comparing, knowledge, motives or about combining
facts, terms, translating, facts, causes. Make information, elements in a
basic concepts, interpreting, techniques and inferences and validity of new
and answers giving Rules in a find evidence ideas, pattern or
descriptions, different way. to support or quality of proposing
and stating generalizations work alternative
main ideas . Based on a set Solutions.
of criteria.

Verbs  Choose  Classify  Apply  Analyze  Agree  Adapt

 Define  Compare  Build  Assume  Appraise  Build
 Find  Contrast  Choose  Categorize  Assess  Change
 How  Demonstrate  Construct  Classify  Award  Choose
 Label  Explain  Develop  Compare  Choose  Combine
 List  Extend  Experiment  Conclusion  Compare  Compile
 Match  Illustrate With  Contrast  Conclude  Compose
 Name  Infer  Identify  Discover  Criteria  Construct
 Omit  Interpret  Interview  Dissect  Decide  Create
 Recall  Outline  Make Use Of  Distinguish  Deduct  Delete
 Relate  Relate  Model  Divide  Defend  Design
 Select  Rephrase  Organize  Examine  Determine  Develop
 Show  Show  Plan  Function  Disprove  Discuss
 Spell  Summarize  Select  Inference  Estimate  Elaborate
 Tell  Translate  Solve  Inspect  Evaluate  Estimate
 What  Utilize  List  Explain  Formulate
 When  Motive  Importance  Happen
 Where  Relationship  Influence  Imagine
 Which s  Interpret  Improve
 Who  Simplify  Judge  Invert
 Why  Survey  Justify  Make Up
 Take Part in  Mark  Maximize
 Test For  Measure  Minimize
 Theme  Opinion  Modify
 Perceive  Original
 Prioritize  Originate
 Prove  Plan Predict
 Rate  Propose
 Recommend  Solution
 Rule On  Solve
 Select  Suppose
 Support  Test
 Value  Theory

Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohi, D.R. (2001). Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, And Assessing, Abridged Edition.Boston, Ma: Allyn And Bacon.

4
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

b. I INTERNAL ASSESSMENT QUESTION PAPER
Class :III sem Max. Marks : 20
Subject :ANALOG ELECTRONICS CIRCUIT Subject code:15EE34
Date : Duration : 1 hour
Faculty : MUHAMMAD SAIFUDDEEN

Question Instructions: (1) Answer any two FULL QUESTIONS. Marks CO Bloom
number. (2) Use of data handbook permitted. Taxonomy
No Level
(BTL)

I a. Convert the given Boolean function in to 5 1 L2

R=f(a,b,c)=(a̅ +b)(b+c̅) minterm canonical form.
P=f(x,y,z)=x+(x̅+z̅)(y+z̅) maxterm canonical form
b. Design a three input, one output minimal low level gate 5 1 L6
combinational circuit which has an output equal to 1 when
majority of inputs are at logic1 and has an output equal to 0
when majority of its inputs are at logic 0

II a. Find the minimal sum of 10 1 L1

f(a,b,c,d)=∑(1, ,4,11,13,15)+∑d(0,5,7,8) using K-map
technique.
b Find the minimal product of following function using k- L1
map f(a,b,c,d)=∏M(0,3,4,7,8,10,12,14)+∑d(2,6).

III a. Simplify the given Boolean function using Quine 10 1 L4

Mccluskey method.
Y=f(a,b,c,d)=∑(0,1,2,6,7,9,10,12)+d(3,5).Verify the
result using k-map

IV a. Simplify the given function using MEV technique taking 10 1 L4

least significant variable as the map entered variable
f(a,b,c,d,e)=∑(1,3,4,6,9,11,12,14,17,19,20,22,25,27,28,30)+
∑d(8,10,24,26) [10 Marks]

Signature of the Course Coordinator Signature of the HOD

5
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

c. SCHEME OF EVALUATION OF II INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
Class : Max. Marks:
Subject : Subject code:
Date : Duration: 1 hour
Note: (1) The major steps and answers at those points should be indicated in a split wise manner.
(2)The marks breakup should be indicated on the right corner after each major step.
(3)Figures if any reqd. should be indicated
Question Solution Marks
Number
1.a 7.5M

6
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

1.b

2.a

7
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

3.a

8
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

SCHEME OF EVALUATION OF I INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
Class : Max. Marks:
Subject : Subject code:
Date : Duration: 1 hour
Note: (1) The major steps and answers at those points should be indicated in a split wise manner.
(2)The marks breakup should be indicated on the right corner after each major step.
(3)Figures if any reqd. should be indicated
Questio Solution Mark
n s
Number
3.a

9
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

3.b

10
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

4.a

11
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

Signature of the Course Coordinator Signature of the HOD

12
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

d.
e.
f. II INTERNAL ASSESSMENT QUESTION PAPER
Class :III sem Max. Marks : 20
Subject :Analog electronics Subject code : 15ec32
Date : Duration : 1 hour
Faculty : Asiya Hazareena

Question Instructions: (1) Answer any two FULL QUESTIONS. Marks CO Bloom
number. No (2) Use of data handbook permitted. Taxonomy
Level (BTL)
(Annexure I)

I a. Implement 3-bit binary to gray converter using 74139 5 2 L6

b. Draw the interfacing diagram 0f ten key keypad, 5 2 L1

interface to a digital system using decimal to BCD
encoder

II a. What is look ahead carry adder? Explain the circuit and 7 2 L6

operation of a 4 bit binary adder with look ahead carry

b. Implement full subtractor using 4:1 multiplexer 3 2 L1

13
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

III a. Configure 16:1 MUX using 4:1 MUX 5 2 L2
b. Draw the logic diagram for 4 to 2 line priority encoder 5 2 L6
with a valid output where the highest priority is given to
the highest bit position or input with highest index and
obtain the minimal sum expression for the output

IV a. Design a comparator to check f two n-bit numbers are 10 2 L6

equal.Configure this using cascaded stages of n-bit
comparator .

Signature of the Course Coordinator Signature of the HOD

g. SCHEME OF EVALUATION OF II INTERNAL ASSESSMENT

Class : Max. Marks:
Subject : Subject code:
Date : Duration: 1 hour
Note: (1) The major steps and answers at those points should be indicated in a split wise manner.
(2)The marks breakup should be indicated on the right corner after each major step.
(3)Figures if any reqd. should be indicated
Question Solution Marks
Number

14
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

SCHEME OF EVALUATION OF II INTERNAL ASSESSMENT

Class : Max. Marks:
Subject : Subject code:
Date : Duration: 1 hour
Note: (1) The major steps and answers at those points should be indicated in a split wise manner.
(2)The marks breakup should be indicated on the right corner after each major step.
(3)Figures if any reqd. should be indicated
Question Solution Marks
Number

15
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

signature of the Course Coordinator Signature of the HOD

h.
i. III INTERNAL ASSESSMENT QUESTION PAPER
Class :iii E&E Max. Marks : 20
Subject :DSD Subject code : 15EE35
Date :23-11-16 Duration : 1 hour
Faculty :Asiya Hazareena

Question Instructions: (1) Answer any two FULL QUESTIONS. Marks CO Bloom
number. No (2) Use of data handbook permitted. Taxonomy
Level (BTL)
(Annexure I)

I a. Explain the operation of gated SR latch with a logic 6 3 L2

diagram and truth table

b. 4 3 L4
Derive the characteristic equation for JK flip-flop

II a. With a neat diagram, explain the working of 4-bit 6 3 L2

SISO universal shift register

b. 4 3 L2
Compare Moore and Mealy models
16
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

III a. 10 3 L6
Design a synchronous counter using JK flip flops to
count the sequence 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 0---

III a. 10 3 L6
A sequential circuit has one input and one output. The
state diagram is shown in figure below. Design a
sequential circuit with T flip-flop

Signature of the Course Coordinator Signature of the HOD

g. SCHEME OF EVALUATION OF III INTERNAL ASSESSMENT

Class : Max. Marks:
Subject : Subject code:
Date : Duration: 1 hour
Note: (1) The major steps and answers at those points should be indicated in a split wise manner.
(2)The marks breakup should be indicated on the right corner after each major step.
(3)Figures if any reqd. should be indicated
Question Solution Marks
Number

17
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

SCHEME OF EVALUATION OF III INTERNAL ASSESSMENT

Class : Max. Marks:
Subject : Subject code:
Date : Duration: 1 hour
Note: (1) The major steps and answers at those points should be indicated in a split wise manner.
(2)The marks breakup should be indicated on the right corner after each major step.
(3)Figures if any reqd. should be indicated
Question Solution Marks
Number

18
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

Signature of the Course Coordinator Signature of the HOD

University (External ) Exams

EXTERNAL QUESTION PAPER

19
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

6.3.2 INDIRECT ASSESSMENT

a. FORMAT of the COURSE FEEDBACK after I, II and III Internal Assessment
Course Feedback
Semester: Year: 20 - 20

STUDENT FEEDBACK (Please tick After After After

(√) in the appropriate column) I Internal II Internal III Internal
Course Code: Course Title:
Student Name: USN:
20
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

Mobile No.: Email ID:
Dated Signature of the Student

Faculty Name: Designation:

Dated Signature of the Faculty

Dear Student
In your opinion, how will you rate the course content of ________ and the competency of the
faculty handling the course.
(Please tick (√) in the appropriate column)
Below Average - 1 Average – 2, Good – 3, Very Good – 4, Excellent – 5,

Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Course Content
Faculty Competency

1 2 3 4 5
Course Outcome

Your Comments to improve the Course Content:

Your Comments to improve the Learning Process:

d. FORMAT of the COURSE EXIT SURVEY at the end of the semester

COURSE EXIT SURVEY

Semester: Year: 2016 - 2017
STUDENT FEEDBACK (Please tick (√) After After After
in the appropriate column) I Internal II Internal III Internal
Course Code: 15EE35 Course Title: Digital System Design
Student Name: USN:
Mobile No.: Email ID:

21
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

Dated Signature of the Student

Faculty Name: Designation:

Dated Signature of the Faculty

Dear Student

In your opinion, how will you grade yourself in the attainment of the following Course Outcomes
after undergoing __________________________ course:
(Please tick (√) in the appropriate column)
Below Average - 1 Average – 2, Good – 3, Very Good – 4, Excellent – 5,

1 2 3 4 5
Course Outcome

Your Comments to improve the Course Content:

7. COURSE ASSESSMENT DATA

7.1 DIRECT ASSESSMENT DATA

Sl. USN Students Name Course: Digital System Design

No Year:2016

22
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

I II III IA External
IA IA IA marks Marks
1 16 04 14 15
ABHISHEK V S

2 CHETHAN V K 16 07 07 14
3 YOGEESH NAYAK T 06 13 14 16
4 4PA14EE005 MD FARIYAD 14 09 14 16
5 4PA14EE012 MUHAMMED SHANU 15 08 04 12
6
4PA15EE002
ABHISHEK BEKAL 12 13 A 15
7 4PA15EE003 ADARSH T 16 12 15 16
8 4PA15EE004 AJAY PRAKASH 12 10 18 16
9 4PA15EE005 ASHWINI M PUJAR 20 15 20 20
10 4PA15EE006 GOWRISH K 14 09 09 14
11 4PA15EE008
JAYAKRISHNAN 11 13 11 14
NAMBOOTHIRI PN

12 4PA15EE010 MAHAMMAD NAUSHAD 14 14 08 16

13 4PA15EE011 MINHAJ KAZI 13 11 07 14
14 4PA15EE012 MOHAMMA SINAN P 15 09 10 15
15 4PA15EE013 MOHAMMAD YASEEN P 13 11 10 13
16 4PA15EE016 NOOR MOHAMMED CC 13 09 07 13
17 4PA15EE018 SACHIN K KHARVI 12 09 14 13
18 4PA15EE019 SUNEER K C 15 08 13 15
19 4PA15EE020 SURAJ NAIK 09 10 14 14

Sl. USN Students Name Course:

No Year:
I II III IA External
IA IA IA marks Marks

23
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

Sl. USN Students Name Course:

No Year:
I II III IA External
IA IA IA marks Marks

24
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

Signature of the Course Coordinator Signature of the HOD

7.2 INDIRECT ASSESSMENT DATA

Sl USN Students Course: Digital System Design

N Name Year:2016
SCORE OF FEED BACK/SURVEY
After After II IA After Course exit survey
I IA III IA
25
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

C C CO CO C C C C C CO C
O O 2 O O O O O O
1 3
1 ABHISHEK V S

2 CHETHAN V K 5 5 5
YOGEESH NAYAK
3 T

4 4PA14EE005 MD FARIYAD 4
MUHAMMED
5 4PA14EE012
SHANU

6
4PA15EE002
ABHISHEK BEKAL 5 5 5
7 4PA15EE003 ADARSH T 4
8 4PA15EE004 AJAY PRAKASH 5 5
9 4PA15EE005
ASHWINI M 4 4 4 4 4 4
PUJAR

10 4PA15EE006 GOWRISH K 4 4 5
11 4PA15EE008
JAYAKRISHNAN 5 5 5 5 5 5
NAMBOOTHIRI PN

12 4PA15EE010
MAHAMMAD 5 5 5 5 5 5
NAUSHAD

13 4PA15EE011 MINHAJ KAZI 5

MOHAMMA
14 4PA15EE012
SINAN P

15 4PA15EE013
MOHAMMAD 5 5 5 5 5 5
YASEEN P

16 4PA15EE016
NOOR 4
MOHAMMED CC
SACHIN K
17 4PA15EE018
KHARVI

18 4PA15EE019 SUNEER K C 5
19 4PA15EE020 SURAJ NAIK

Sl USN Students Course:

N Name Year:
SCORE OF FEED BACK/SURVEY
After I After II After III Course exit survey
IA IA IA
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO

26
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

Sl USN Students Course:

N Name Year:
SCORE OF FEED BACK/SURVEY
After I After II After III Course exit survey
IA IA IA
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO

27
 P.A. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANGALURU

Department of Computer science and Engineering

Signature of the Course Coordinator Signature of the HOD

28