Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
" Complete the Pre-practical test (worth 1 mark out of the 10 marks available for the
practical).
All references for pre reading are to your textbook:
Knox, B, Ladiges, P, Evans, B & Saint, R 2014, Biology, an Australian focus, 5th edn, McGraw-Hill
Education (Australia), North Ryde.
Bring to practical:
• Printed copy of Practical 1 notes
• Lab coat, safety glasses, sharp HB pencil ruler, eraser, pen, calculator
• Permanent marker pen for labelling
• Student card for scanning
In this class you will observe the DNA material isolated from bacteria. You will investigate
the phenotypic changes caused by a single gene in Arabidopsis thaliana, propose a
genetic hypothesis to explain your observations and test this with statistical analysis.
You will observe the growth, or absence of growth, of auxotrophic bacteria in the presence
of supplements.
Assessment
• Pre-practical Test
• In-practical assessment
• Integrated Post-practical questions in Module Test 2
Time Management
• Begin practical with the DNA extraction.
• During Steps 1 and 3 incubations (each 15 minutes) start the analysis of the Arabidopsis plates.
• DNA extraction should be completed at the end of one hour and shown to your demonstrator for
assessment.
• Complete the observations of the auxotroph.
A risk assessment has been carried out for the practical classes and identified risks minimised.
Please observe the safety signs displayed and ask your demonstrator if you would like to know
more, MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheets) are available in the laboratory. Further information
can be found at: http://safety.unimelb.edu.au
Prior to the practical complete a flow chart showing steps 1 to 7 of the DNA extraction.
Flow chart:
Equipment
• A plastic tube containing E. coli suspension
• Pipettes
• Microfuge tubes containing lysozyme, protease, sodium dodecyl sulphate
• Conical flask containing sodium perchlorate
• Squeeze bottle containing 100% Ethanol
Procedure
The cells you will use were grown in nutrient broth and have been resuspended in a lysis buffer to
a volume of 2.5 ml. They are in a screw-top tube on your bench.
1. Using a pipette, add 0.5 ml of the enzyme lysozyme (10 mg/ml) to the cell suspension. With
a permanent marker, label the lid of the tube with your seat number and screw the lid on,
leaving it a little loose. Incubate at 37˚C for 15 minutes. Lysozyme digests the cell wall.
2. Add 200 μL of the 20% ionic detergent named sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS). Screw the
lid on tightly then gently mix by inverting the tube about five times. Sodium dodecyl sulphate
causes the plasma membrane of the cells to rupture.
3. Loosen the lid of the tube slightly and incubate at 55˚C for 15 minutes. The solution will
become slightly viscous, but this won’t be obvious.
4. Add 0.3 ml of protease (20 mg/ml) to the suspension (now called a lysate). Screw the lid on
loosely and incubate at 37˚C for 20 minutes.
5. Cool the tube and its contents on ice. The tube should feel cool to the touch before
proceeding.
6. Add 0.8 ml of sodium perchlorate (5 M). Invert gently about five times. Take care when
mixing (see Safety Note). The sodium perchlorate will assist in separating the protein from
the DNA and stabilising the DNA.
7. Tilt the tube at an angle and using a measuring cylinder carefully and slowly add 5 ml of
cold ethanol down the side of the tube so that it forms a layer above the DNA solution. It is at
the interface of the ethanol and lysate that the DNA will precipitate out of solution.
8. Identify the DNA as strands that form at the interface immediately after the addition of the
ethanol. There will be bubbles associated with these strands. Keep your tube vertical. Take
your tube and this page to your demonstrator for assessment.
Question 1: The solution may sometimes become viscous after the cell wall and cell
membrane are ruptured. Why might this be?
In a laboratory setting, the DNA you have extracted from E. coli would be purified and used in
other procedures such as gel electrophoresis (see Practical 3)
In this section of the practical you will investigate the inheritance of a gene which is involved in the
plant’s response to the hormone gibberellin. Gibberellins (GAs) are plant hormones that are
necessary for many developmental processes, including seed germination, stem elongation, leaf
expansion, trichome (hair) development, pollen maturation and the induction of flowering. Hence,
mutant plants that are deficient in GA exhibit a dwarf and late-flowering phenotype. For most
mutants, normal growth will occur with the application of gibberellin. The mutant you are
investigating is insensitive to gibberellin, and application of the hormone does not change the dwarf
phenotype.
Can you suggest what the role of this gene might be?
Two pure breeding (homozygous) varieties of plants have been crossed (P),
and their heterozygous progeny were allowed to self fertilise to produce F2:
Parents (P1 X P2) = purebreeding à F1 = heterozygous à F1 X F1 à F2
Equipment
• Demonstration containers of parents and F1
• Container of F2 offspring
Procedure
1. Look at the demonstration pots showing these two varieties in the
parents (P1 and P2) and their offspring (F1).
Plants of the F1 generation were allowed to self-fertilise and set seed (Figure 4). The F2 seeds were
germinated. You have been supplied with pots containing young F2 plants.
Score the phenotype of the plants and record your own data and the data from your group in Table 1.
Phenotype
Own data
Group
data
Figure 4. A. thaliana in fruit. The plants are staked to support the fruits for seed harvesting. The fruit is a siliqua 5–20 mm
long, containing 20–30 seeds.
Tall Dwarf
Parental
×
genotypes
F1 genotypes
F2 genotypes meiosis
1. There is/ are ______ gene locus/i being considered in this cross with ______ allele/s. The
dominant phenotype is _________________________. The F2 of this _____________ cross will
produce a phenotypic ratio of ____________________.
2. Using the appropriate statistical test (c2) compare the predictions of your genetic hypothesis with
the observed results. Use the class data. Apart from the information in the TechTip, you can
also refer to the Appendix pages at the end of this practical P1-14 to P1-17.
Copyright: School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne
P1- 10 Practical 1: DNA, a Gene, an Auxotroph BIOL10005: 2018
Table 2: c2 Analysis
Phenotype
TOTAL
Tall Dwarf
Observed
(O)
Expected
(E)
(O-E)2
E
c2 = å (O-E)2
E
Probability
X
end of meiosis 1
end of
meiosis II
Question 8: Describe what you see on these 5 plates (hold the plate up to the ceiling to see
whether there is growth or not).
Question 10:
I worked with Strain _________________
Draw the pattern of growth you see, on the
template.
Question 11: Collect data for the 4 strains and enter the results in Table 5. Indicate when
growth occurred around the disc with a + and – for no growth
Amino
Strain A Strain B Strain C Strain D
Acid
Arg
Leu
Meth
Tyr
Phe
Water
Note: you will not be able to draw a single biochemical pathway for these results.
Question 12:
b. Had there been growth of E. coli around the disc impregnated with water, how would this
influence the conclusions you could draw from your experiment?
Question 13: Describe in what amino acid pathway there was a mutation for each of the strains.
Strain A
Strain B
Strain C
Strain D
Question 14: What was unusual about strain D? How can you explain this result?
Each of these steps will be examined in turn and then worked examples of genetic analysis will be
provided.
The null hypothesis is rejected in most genetic experiments when the deviation is so large that it
could be accounted for by chance less than 5% of the time. Such results are said to be significant
and the null hypothesis is rejected. When we reject the null hypothesis at the 5% level we take a
one in twenty chance of discarding a valid hypothesis. It must be remembered that statistics can
NEVER render absolute PROOF of the hypothesis, but merely set limits to our certainty.
If we accept the null hypothesis we also then accept the genetic hypothesis upon which it based.
The genetic hypothesis has not been proven; it simply explains the observed data satisfactorily
and is accepted until it is refuted by contrary data.
3. Statistical Test
a) Degrees of Freedom (df)
Assume a coin is tossed 100 times. We may arbitrarily assign any number of heads from 0 to 100
as appearing in this hypothetical experiment. However, once the number of heads is established,
the remainder is tails and must add up to 100. In other words, we have n-1 degrees of freedom,
where n is the number of classes (in this case 2; heads and tails).
(a) In an experiment involving three phenotypes (n=3), we can fill two of the classes at random,
but the number in the third class must constitute the remainder of the total number of
individuals observed. Therefore, we have 3-1 = 2 degrees of freedom.
(b) A 9:3:3:1 dihybrid ratio has four phenotypes (n=4). There are 4-1 = 3 degrees of freedom.
For most genetic problems concerning inheritance, the degrees of freedom will be one less than
the number of phenotypic classes.
b) Chi-square (c ) test
2
In order to evaluate a genetic hypothesis, we need a test which can convert deviations between
observed and expected values into the probability of such inequalities occurring by chance.
Furthermore, this test must take into account the size of the sample and the number of variables
(i.e. degrees of freedom). The chi-square test (pronounced ki, symbolised c) includes all of these
factors.
c 2
= å (O-E)2
E
df
df = degrees of freedom
The value may then be converted into the probability that the deviation is due to chance by
reading Table A1 at the appropriate number of degrees of freedom.
PROBABILITY
DEGREES
NON-SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT
OF
FREEDOM 0.95 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.50 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.05 0.01 0.001
CHI SQUARE VALUES
1 0.004 0.02 0.06 0.125 0.46 1.07 1.64 2.71 3.84 6.44 10.83
2 0.10 0.21 0.45 0.71 1.39 2.41 3.22 4.60 5.99 9.21 13.82
3 0.35 0.58 1.012 1.42 2.37 3.66 4.64 6.25 7.82 11.34 16.27
4 0.71 1.06 1.65 2.20 3.36 4.88 5.99 7.78 9.49 13.28 18.47
5 1.14 1.61 2.34 3.00 4.35 6.06 7.29 9.24 11.07 15.09 20.52
Remember you are testing the null hypothesis. The probability values in the table relate to the
null hypothesis; the higher the probability value the greater is our confidence in the null hypothesis.
c) Chi-square limitations
The chi-square test as used for analysing the results of genetic experiments has two important
limitations:
(1) It must only be used on numerical data itself, NEVER on percentages or proportions
derived from the data.
(2) It cannot be used where the expected frequency in any phenotypic class is less than 5.
Then,
P w+w+ x ww
(black) (white)
F1 w+w
(black)
F2
Genotypic ratio: 1 w+w+ : 2 w+w : 1 ww
c =
2
å (O-E)2
E
df = n (number of classes) - 1
black white
Observed (O) 80 20
Expected (E) 75 25
c =
2
å (O-E)2
E
= 0.33 + 1.00 = 1.33 ; p>0.20
df = 1
Conclusion: The probability that the difference between observed and expected numbers is due
to sampling error (chance) alone is greater than 20% but less than 30% which can be expressed as
0.20<p<0.30. Therefore, we accept the null hypothesis and the underlying genetic hypothesis that
gave rise to the prediction (because the observed results are consistent with the hypothesis).
Note: The simplest genetic hypothesis that fits the data should be the one tested first. Only if the
simplest hypothesis is rejected should more complex hypotheses be considered.