Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Aperture Antennas
Reflectors, horns.
High Gain
Nearly real input impedance
Huygens’ Principle
97
Antennas 98
Equivalence Principle
To further simplify,
Case 1: PEC. No contribution from .
Case 2: PMC. No contribution from .
98
Antennas 99
To calculate the fields, first find the vector potential due to the
equivalent electric and magnetic currents.
Since in the far field, the fields can be approximate by spherical TEM
waves,
99
Antennas 100
Let
and
100
Antennas 101
This implies
101
Antennas 102
Then,
where
Therefore,
At principle planes
102
Antennas 103
Also,
103
Antennas 104
104
Antennas 105
105
Antennas 106
Directivity
Total power
Then,
If
then
106
Antennas 107
where
: aperture efficiency
: radiation efficiency. (~1 for aperture antennas)
Beam efficiency
107
Antennas 108
3. High gain
108
Antennas 109
109
Antennas 110
Directivity
110
Antennas 111
111
Antennas 112
112
Antennas 113
113
Antennas 114
At optimum condition:
Optimum gain
Design procedure:
1. Specify gain , wavelength , waveguide dimension , .
114
Antennas 115
3. Determine from
4. Determine , by ,
5. Determine , by ,
6. Determine , by ,
7. Verify if and , by
Example 7-7: Design a X-band (8.2 to 12.4 GHz) standard horn fed
by WR90 ( )waveguide.
Goal: at 8.75 GHz.
1. Solve for A:
2. Solve for the rest parameters:
115
Antennas 116
116
Antennas 117
117
Antennas 118
118
Antennas 119
Reflector Antennas
Parabolic Reflector
Parabolic equation:
or
Properties
1. Focal point at . All rays leaving , will be parallel after
reflection from the parabolic surface.
2. All path lengths from the focal point to any aperture plane are
equal.
3. To determine the radiation pattern, find the field distribution at
the aperture plane using GO.
Geometrical Optics (GO)
119
Antennas 120
Requirements
1. The radius curvature of the reflector is large compared to a
wavelength, allowing planar approximation.
2. The radius curvature of the incoming wave from the feed is
large, allowing planar approximation.
3. The reflector is a perfect conductor, thus the reflect coefficient
.
Parabolic reflector:
Wideband.
Lower limit determine by the size of the reflector. Should be
several wavelengths for GO to hold.
Higher limit determine by the surface roughness of the reflector.
Should much smaller than a wavelength.
Also limited by the bandwidth of the feed.
where ,
120
Antennas 121
PO and GO both yield good patterns in main beam and first few
sidelobes. Deteriorate due to diffraction by the edge of the reflector.
PO is better than GO for offset reflectors.
121
Antennas 122
Summary:
1. F/D increases, cross-polarization decreases. -7809Since the
range of decreases as F/D increases, the term .
2. Fields inverted because of reflection from conductor.
3. Cross-polarization cancels each other on principal plane in the
far field.
122
Antennas 123
123
Antennas 124
124
Antennas 125
Approximation formula
Thus,
(7-208)
where
EI=edge illumination (dB) =20 log C
ET=edge taper (dB)=-EI
FT=feed taper (at aperture edge) (dB)=
Spherical spreading loss at the aperture edge
125
Antennas 126
Assume
, then
Use Table 7.1b for n=2 and interpolate, we have
( measured)
( measured)
126
Antennas 127
127
Antennas 128
Other types
Design example
1. Determine the reflector diameter by half-power beam width.
For the optimum -11 dB edge illumination,
(7-248)
(7-249)
Example 7-9:
From 7-248
128
Antennas 129
129
Antennas 130
130
Antennas 131
131
Antennas 132
132
Antennas 133
Then,
133
Antennas 134
134
Antennas 135
135