Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ROBERT GORDON
UNIVERSITY
ABERDEEN
TUTORIALS
©MBO2006
FACULTY OF DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
TUTORIAL 1
INFLOW PERFORMANCE
2. A vertical oilwell is producing at a rate of 5000 barrels per day into a 50psi
separator through a 2’’ tubing. Given the following well data, estimate :
Well data :
Reservoir pressure = 2000psi
Flowing bottom hole pressure = 1500psi
Well depth = 3000ft TVD Oil SG = 0.8(Water = 8.33ppg)
Friction + Misc. pressure loss in tubing, etc = 100psi.
(ii) What is the fraction of the total flow that passes through each
core?
3. A vertical well has been completed by inside casing perforated completions through
a gas reservoir and producing at steady state. PVT analysis of the natural gas
sample shows that the composition is as presented in Table Q4. Well test data
analysis indicates that the formation permeability is damaged by drilling/completion
fluid invasion to a radius of 6.5ft and the permeability in the damaged zone is 50% of
the clean formation permeability. Additional skins identified include :
Perforation skin = 30
Partial penetration skin = 10
Compute:
(a) the gas compressibility factor
©MBO2006
(b) the total skin
(c) the delivery from the well in MSCF/day
(d) The Productivity Index
(e) The Flow Efficiency
(f) The AOF
©MBO2006
FACULTY OF DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
5. During drilling, a well is damaged out to a radius of 3ft such that the permeability
is reduced by a factor of 3 in the damaged zone. If the wellbore radius is
0.3333ft and the drainage radius is 660ft, estimate the percentage increase in
pressure drop attributable to the damaged zone. (Assume steady state flow)
6. During drilling, a well is damaged out to a radius of 4ft from the wellbore so
that the permeability within the damaged zone is reduced to 1/100th of the
undamaged effective permeability. Estimate the flow efficiency given that the
wellbore radius is 0.3333ft and the drainage radius is 660ft.
(b) An 8-1/2’’ exploratory vertical well has been drilled through an oil
reservoir and tested for production at steady state. Preliminary
analysis data on the core sample taken from the well as part of
formation evaluation are as follows :
©MBO2006
Clean dry weight of core sample = 311gms
Wt. of core sample filled 100% with 1.05SG Brine = 335gms
Diameter of core sample = 4cm Length of core sample = 10cm
Core Flood data with the permeameter :
Test Fluid : 1.05SG Brine(Viscosity = 1.1cp)
Inlet pressure = 50psig Outlet pressure = 14.7psia
Core Flood flow rate = 1cc/sec
Formation Relative Permeability to oil = 0.9
∆t(Min) Pws(Psi)
0 2710
1 2760
2 2803
4 2830
5 2825
7 2828
9 2830
12 2832
20 2833
60 2837
120 2839
300 2842
420 2842
550 2842
©MBO2006
Bo = 1.31rb/stb h = 110fft rw = 0.362ft
e. Repeat Q23d using the MDH analysis technique and comment on your
results.
(b). A vertical well is producing 45o Gravity oil at a rate of 5000stb/day into a 50psi
separator through a 2-1/2’’ production tubing. The well is completed with a slotted
liner with an effective wellbore diameter of 8-1/2’’ through an unconsolidated
sandstone formation with a permeability of 1000mD and pay thickness of 25ft.
During drilling and completion the reservoir suffers a zonal damage out to a radius of
6.25ft. reducing the formation permeability in the damaged region to 200mD. The
other well and reservoir data are as follows :
Compute:
Assuming the gravel used is a 20/40 Mesh Commercial gravel with permeability
of 800D and the gravelpack thickness is 2’’. [ See Fig. Q25]
Compute
(i) The Screen Diameter
©MBO2006
(ii) The Total Drawdown [ N.B. : The effective wellbore radius is now the Screen
Radius!]
(iii) The tubing head flowing pressure. Comment on your result.
11. (a) With the aid of suitable schematic diagram(s) briefly distinguish between
the inflow performance (IPR) and vertical/wellbore lift performance (VLP)
relationships
(b) Briefly sketch how the optimum production conduit sizes are determined
from a simple nodal analysis of the combination of the IPR and VLP curves.
(i) Detailed Process Design for the Completion Programme based on your
original Well Design
(ii) Details of Completion String Facilities including the Functions of each facility
selected
(iii) Schematic Diagram of the Completion Design
(b). An vertical well [Fig Q12] is producing 45o Gravity oil at a rate of 5000stb/day
into a 50psi separator through a 2-1/2’’ production tubing. The well is completed with
an Inside casing gravelpack with an effective wellbore diameter of 8-1/2’’ through an
unconsolidated sandstone formation with a permeability of 1000mD and pay
thickness of 25ft. During drilling and completion the reservoir suffers a onal
damage out to a radius of 6.25ft reducing the formation permeability in the damaged
region to 200mD. The other well and reservoir data are as follows :
Compute:
©MBO2006
Assume a pseudo-steady state flow condition.
14 (a) Briefly describe two possible the key intervention processes that can be
carried out within a hydrocarbon reservoir in order to optimise of
production:
Compute:
©MBO2006
7.08kh pR − pwf k g − k gd rg
q= sg = * ln sT = Total skin
µ ⎡ re ⎤ k gd rw'
⎢ln − 0.5 + sT ⎥
⎣ rw ⎦
©MBO2006
rs=4.5’’
7’’ Liner
15 (a). With the aid of labeled schematic diagram distinguish between the different
types of completion strategies adopted in oil/gas well completion.
(b) Outline the objectives of Well Drillstem Testing
© A vertical well has been completed by inside casing perforated completions through
a gas reservoir and producing at steady state. PVT analysis of the natural gas
sample shows that the composition is as presented in Table Q15. Well test data
analysis indicates that the formation permeability is damaged by drilling/completion
fluid invasion to a radius of 6.5ft and the permeability in the damaged zone is 50% of
the clean formation permeability. Additional skins identified include :
Perforation skin = 30
Partial penetration skin = 10
©MBO2006
Pay Thickness = 100ft
Compute:
(g) the gas compressibility factor
(h) the total skin
(i) the delivery from the well in MSCF/day
(j) The Productivity Index
©MBO2006
©MBO2006