Summary Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 PREFERABILITY OF PROCUREMENT ROUTE BASED ON LOWER

R1 R2 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 0.57 0.07 0.06 0.59 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.11
MANAGING AGENT 0.21 0.15 0.09 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.11 0.12
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.11 0.39 0.43 0.18 0.41 0.37 0.40 0.41
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.11 0.39 0.43 0.18 0.41 0.46 0.40 0.36

Consistency Ratio 0.002 0.012 0.043 0.08 0.026 0.058 0.048 0.013

2 PREFERABILITY OF PROCUREMENT ROUTE

R1 R2 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 0.13 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.10 0.05
MANAGING AGENT 0.08 0.11 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.38 0.4 0.4 0.36 0.36 0.40 0.4 0.39
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.41 0.4 0.4 0.41 0.41 0.40 0.4 0.46

Consistency Ratio 0.089 0.048 0.09 0.013 0.013 0.09 0.024 0.044

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPER

R1 R2 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9
 CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 0.058 0.098 0.06 0.09 0.10 0.07 0.09 0.07
MANAGING AGENT 0.22 0.223 0.087 0.14 0.30 0.28 0.12 0.28
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.22 0.293 0.427 0.36 0.35 0.32 0.397 0.322
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.502 0.386 0.427 0.409 0.25 0.32 0.397 0.322

Consistency Ratio 0.057 0.064 0.063 0.077 0.025 0.01 0.088 0.01

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON

R1 R2 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 0.077 0.094 0.116 0.09 0.25 0.07 0.07 0.12
MANAGING AGENT 0.13 0.163 0.09 0.16 0.25 0.13 0.19 0.23
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.345 0.371 0.397 0.371 0.25 0.36 0.169 0.305
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.345 0.371 0.397 0.371 0.25 0.45 0.565 0.346

Consistency Ratio 0.056 0.043 0.009 0.043 0.000 0.09 0.049 0.084

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON D

R1 R2 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 0.532 0.480 0.572 0.39 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.57
MANAGING AGENT 0.31 0.277 0.209 0.32 0.25 0.24 0.30 0.27
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.081 0.122 0.109 0.144 0.10 0.09 0.078 0.09
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.081 0.122 0.109 0.144 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.073
Consistency Ratio 0.078 0.073 0.001 0.009 0.021 0.02 0.06 0.03
6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAG

R1 R2 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 0.084 0.094 0.06 0.10 0.12 0.06 0.10 0.06
MANAGING AGENT 0.22 0.163 0.087 0.35 0.09 0.12 0.11 0.12
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.369 0.371 0.427 0.297 0.40 0.37 0.397 0.366
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.325 0.371 0.427 0.25 0.40 0.45 0.397 0.452

Consistency Ratio 0.011 0.043 0.06 0.02 0.008 0.03 0.05 0.03

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SU

R1 R2 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 0.57 0.480 0.56 0.61 0.53 0.59 0.57 0.57
MANAGING AGENT 0.21 0.28 0.25 0.21 0.24 0.19 0.23 0.27
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.11 0.12 0.1 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.16 0.09
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.11 0.12 0.1 0.09 0.11 0.07 0.05 0.07

Consistency Ratio 0 0.07 0.02 0.08 0.000 0.02 0.071 0.034

er under each factor

UTE BASED ON LOWER MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION COST

Final Priority
R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 R17 R19 R20 Ranking (Avg)

0.06 0.12 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.54 0.17
0.12 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.08 0.54 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.31 0.14

0.37 0.40 0.43 0.40 0.37 0.22 0.35 0.40 0.37 0.10 0.34

0.45 0.40 0.43 0.40 0.46 0.19 0.45 0.40 0.46 0.05 0.36

1.00
0.027 0.006 0.033 0.06 0.012 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.017 0.096

PROCUREMENT ROUTE BASED ON RISK SHARING

Final Priority
R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 R17 R19 R20 Ranking (Avg)

0.10 0.09 0.04 0.12 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.10
0.08 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.08 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.10 0.10

0.4 0.4 0.42 0.4 0.37 0.38 0.38 0.43 0.43 0.35 0.39

0.42 0.4 0.42 0.4 0.46 0.38 0.38 0.43 0.43 0.45 0.41
1.00

0.022 0.088 0.084 0.009 0.017 0 0 0.063 0.003 0.016

MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

Final Priority
R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 R17 R19 R20 Ranking (Avg)
 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07
0.28 0.28 0.28 0.30 0.28 0.12 0.15 0.31 0.15 0.15 0.22

0.322 0.322 0.322 0.3 0.315 0.263 0.391 0.313 0.38 0.391 0.33

0.322 0.322 0.322 0.3 0.342 0.564 0.391 0.313 0.413 0.391 0.37
1.00

0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.022 0.044 0.012 0 0.1 0.012

ON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

Final Priority
R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 R17 R19 R20 Ranking (Avg)

0.07 0.09 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.12 0.07 0.07 0.12 0.09
0.28 0.29 0.32 0.13 0.12 0.30 0.09 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.20

0.315 0.292 0.318 0.418 0.299 0.3 0.397 0.322 0.322 0.397 0.34

0.342 0.331 0.318 0.418 0.523 0.3 0.397 0.322 0.322 0.397 0.38
1.00

0.022 0.011 0 0.083 0.02 0.0004 0.009 0.01 0.01 0.009

ON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

Final Priority
R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 R17 R19 R20 Ranking (Avg)

0.71 0.56 0.65 0.67 0.57 0.55 0.73 0.65 0.56 0.65 0.58
0.18 0.25 0.09 0.16 0.23 0.28 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.19 0.23

0.063 0.096 0.13 0.087 0.162 0.094 0.072 0.077 0.096 0.077 0.10

0.056 0.096 0.13 0.087 0.047 0.083 0.072 0.077 0.096 0.077 0.09
1.00
0.09 0.021 0.0002 0.007 0.086 0.051 0.012 0.038 0.021 0.038
ATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

Final Priority
R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 R17 R19 R20 Ranking (Avg)

0.07 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.09 0.10 0.07 0.08
0.10 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.15 0.14

0.404 0.397 0.411 0.39 0.366 0.366 0.42 0.397 0.249 0.391 0.38

0.422 0.397 0.411 0.461 0.452 0.452 0.42 0.397 0.558 0.391 0.41
1.00

0.091 0.08 0.085 0.044 0.03 0.02 0.051 0.009 0.021 0.012

ON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

Final Priority
R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 R17 R19 R20 Ranking (Avg)

0.51 0.54 0.54 0.61 0.55 0.40 0.56 0.67 0.56 0.65 0.56
0.29 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.31 0.40 0.30 0.16 0.25 0.19 0.24

0.15 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.12 0.08 0.09 0.1 0.08 0.11

0.04 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.09 0.1 0.08 0.09
1.00

0.084 0.088 0.088 0.078 0.089 0.009 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.04
R1 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.333 1 2.00 2.00
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.5 1 1

Sum 1.733 5.000 9.000 9

Sum * PV 0.992 1.045 0.984 0.9842453723
Lambda - Max n
4.01 4
CI 0.002
CR 0.002

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 0.2 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 0.2 0.3333333333
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 0.5
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 3 2 1

Sum 9.3333333333 12 3.4 2.1666666667

Sum * PV 1.2495882188 0.927578693 1.2799089229 0.8934759659
Lambda - Max n
4.35 4
CI 0.117
CR 0.089

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.2 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 5 1 1 0.3333333333
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 0.3333333333
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 3 3 1

Sum 16 5.2 5.2 1.8666666667

Sum * PV 0.9270734532 1.144688176 1.1446881761 0.9366806886
Lambda - Max n
4.15 4
CI 0.051
CR 0.057

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.3333333333 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.2
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 1

Sum 12 9.333333333 2.6666666667 2.4

Sum * PV 0.9223987416 1.242610044 0.9195385561 1.0684072541
Lambda - Max n
4.152954596 4
CI 0.0509848653
CR 0.0566498504

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 5 5
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.2 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.2 1 1

Sum 1.7333333333 4.4 12 12

Sum * PV 0.9213562825 1.350322679 0.9693406837 0.9693406837
Lambda - Max n
4.2103603288 4
CI 0.0701201096
CR 0.0779112329

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.2 0.333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.6 0.6
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1.666666667 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 1.666666667 1 1

Sum 12 4.67 2.8 2.93

Sum * PV 1.01 1.03 1.03 0.95
Lambda - Max n
4.0292407593 4
CI 0.0097469198
CR 0.0108299109

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5.00 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.33 1 2.00 2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.5 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.5 1 1

Sum 1.73 5 9.00 9.00

Sum * PV 0.99 1.04 0.98 0.98
Lambda - Max n
4.01 4
CI 0.00
CR 0.00
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.943 0.57

1.075 0.21

0.562 0.11

0.562 0.11
5.142 1

4.00536093

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.6687403 0.13

0.3860974 0.08

1.88030155 0.38

2.05976714 0.41
4.99490639 1
 4.3505518

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.29906976 0.058

1.13621937 0.220

1.13621937 0.220

2.59002006 0.502
5.16152855 1

4.15313049

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.3860974 0.077

0.6687403 0.133
1.73205081 0.345

2.23606798 0.445
5.02295649 1

4.1529546

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.94283096 0.532

1.69904424 0.307

0.4472136 0.081

0.4472136 0.081
5.53630239 1

4.21036033
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.386 0.084

1.019 0.222

1.69904424 0.369

1.49534878 0.325
4.600 1

4.03

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.94 0.57

1.07 0.21

0.56 0.11

0.56 0.11
5.14 1

4.01
R2 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3.000 1 0.33 0.33
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1

Sum 14.00 7.33 2.53 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.94 1.11 0.99 0.99
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.010
CR 0.012

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.5 0.3333333333 0.33
MANAGING
AGENT 2.00 1 0.2 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 9.00 11.5 2.5333333333 2.53

Sum * PV 0.88 1.23 1.01 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.13 4
CI 0.043
CR 0.048

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 0.3333333333
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1

Sum 10 5.333333333 3.3333333333 2.6666666667

Sum * PV 0.9777341486 1.188667676 0.9777341486 1.0294164037
Lambda - Max n
4.17 4
CI 0.058
CR 0.064

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1

Sum 10 7.333333333 2.6666666667 2.6666666667

Sum * PV 0.9408669909 1.195061583 0.990600477 0.990600477
Lambda - Max n
4.1171295279 4
CI 0.039043176
CR 0.0433813066

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 3 3
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 3 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.3333333333 0.333333333 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.3333333333 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 2 4.666666667 8 8
Sum * PV 0.9597355462 1.292908344 0.9723217557 0.9723217557
Lambda - Max n
4.1972874015 4
CI 0.0657624672
CR 0.073069408

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.3333333333 0.333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1

Sum 10 7.33 2.6666666667 2.67

Sum * PV 0.94 1.20 0.99 0.99
Lambda - Max n
4.1171295279 4
CI 0.039043176
CR 0.0433813066

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 3.00 3
MANAGING
AGENT 0.33 1 3.00 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.3333333333 0.333333333 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.3333333333 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 2.00 4.666666667 8.00 8.00

Sum * PV 0.96 1.29 0.97 0.97
Lambda - Max n
4.20 4
CI 0.07
CR 0.07
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.34 0.07

0.76 0.15

1.97 0.39

1.97 0.39
5.04 1

4.03

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.49 0.10

0.53 0.11

1.97 0.40

1.97 0.40
4.95 1
 4.13

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.43869134 0.098

1 0.223

1.31607401 0.293

1.73205081 0.386
4.48681616 1

4.17355238

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.43869134 0.094

0.75983569 0.163
1.73205081 0.371

1.73205081 0.371
4.66262864 1

4.11712953

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.27950706 0.480

1.31607401 0.277

0.57735027 0.122

0.57735027 0.122
4.75028161 1

4.1972874
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.439 0.094

0.760 0.163

1.73205081 0.371

1.73205081 0.371
4.663 1

4.12

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.28 0.48

1.32 0.28

0.58 0.12

0.58 0.12
4.75 1

4.20
R5 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3.000 1 0.14 0.14
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1

Sum 14.00 15.33 2.34 2.3428571429

Sum * PV 0.83 1.34 1.00 1.00
Lambda - Max n
4.17 4
CI 0.057
CR 0.043

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.33
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.2 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 8.00 12 2.5333333333 2.53

Sum * PV 0.93 1.08 1.01 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.02 4
CI 0.008
CR 0.009

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.1428571429 0.1428571429
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1

Sum 14 15.33333333 2.3428571429 2.3428571429

Sum * PV 0.8343493853 1.337682671 0.999420031 0.999420031
Lambda - Max n
4.17 4
CI 0.057
CR 0.063

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 1 1 0.2 0.2
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 8 12 2.5333333333 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.9311081389 1.081849895 1.0050459447 1.0050459447
Lambda - Max n
4.0230499229 4
CI 0.0076833076
CR 0.0085370085

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 2 2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.5 1 1

Sum 1.7333333333 5 9 9
Sum * PV 0.9919922445 1.044877941 0.9842453723 0.9842453723
Lambda - Max n
4.0053609299 4
CI 0.0017869766
CR 0.0019855296

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.2 0.200
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.1428571429 0.1428571429
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1

Sum 14 15.33 2.3428571429 2.34

Sum * PV 0.83 1.34 1.00 1.00
Lambda - Max n
4.1708721186 4
CI 0.0569573729
CR 0.0632859699

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5.00 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.33 1 3.00 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 1.73 4.666666667 10.00 10.00

Sum * PV 0.97 1.16 0.96 0.96
Lambda - Max n
4.06 4
CI 0.02
CR 0.02
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.34 0.06

0.50 0.09

2.43 0.43

2.43 0.43
5.70 1

4.17

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.58 0.12

0.45 0.09

1.97 0.40

1.97 0.40
4.96 1
 4.02

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.33980885 0.060

0.49742922 0.087

2.43229928 0.427

2.43229928 0.427
5.70183663 1

4.17087212

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.57735027 0.116

0.4472136 0.090
1.96798967 0.397

1.96798967 0.397
4.96054321 1

4.02304992

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.94283096 0.572

1.07456993 0.209

0.56234133 0.109

0.56234133 0.109
5.14208354 1

4.00536093
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.340 0.060

0.497 0.087

2.43229928 0.427

2.43229928 0.427
5.702 1

4.17

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.94 0.56

1.32 0.25

0.51 0.10

0.51 0.10
5.28 1

4.06
R5 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 5 5 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.200 1 0.20 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 5 1 1

Sum 1.60 16.00 7.20 7.2

Sum * PV 0.95 0.85 1.28 1.28
Lambda - Max n
4.35 4
CI 0.116
CR 0.088

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.33
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.3333333333 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 8.00 10 2.6666666667 2.53

Sum * PV 0.97 1.06 0.97 1.04
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.011
CR 0.013

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 10 9.333333333 2.6666666667 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.9125197746 1.298307306 0.9607548493 1.0370468529
Lambda - Max n
4.21 4
CI 0.070
CR 0.077

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1

Sum 10 7.333333333 2.6666666667 2.6666666667

Sum * PV 0.9408669909 1.195061583 0.990600477 0.990600477
Lambda - Max n
4.1171295279 4
CI 0.039043176
CR 0.0433813066

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 3 3
MANAGING
AGENT 1 1 2 2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.3333333333 0.5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.3333333333 0.5 1 1

Sum 2.6666666667 3 7 7
Sum * PV 1.0439975023 0.95897294 1.010951515 1.010951515
Lambda - Max n
4.0248734722 4
CI 0.0082911574
CR 0.0092123971

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.3333333333 0.333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 0.5 1 1

Sum 10 2.83 3.3333333333 4.33

Sum * PV 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.08
Lambda - Max n
4.0672597247 4
CI 0.0224199082
CR 0.0249110092

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 5 5.00 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.20 1 3.00 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 1.60 6.666666667 10.00 10.00

Sum * PV 0.97 1.40 0.92 0.92
Lambda - Max n
4.21 4
CI 0.07
CR 0.08
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.34 0.59

0.30 0.05

1.00 0.18

1.00 0.18
5.64 1

4.35

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.58 0.12

0.51 0.11

1.73 0.36

1.97 0.41
4.79 1
 4.03

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.43869134 0.091

0.6687403 0.139

1.73205081 0.360

1.96798967 0.409
4.80747212 1

4.20862878

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.43869134 0.094

0.75983569 0.163
1.73205081 0.371

1.73205081 0.371
4.66262864 1

4.11712953

Priority
4th Root Vector

1.73205081 0.391

1.41421356 0.320

0.6389431 0.144

0.6389431 0.144
4.42415058 1

4.02487347
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.439 0.099

1.565 0.354

1.31607401 0.297

1.10668192 0.250
4.427 1

4.07

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.34 0.61

1.16 0.21

0.51 0.09

0.51 0.09
5.52 1

4.21
R6 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 0.20 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 0.333 1 0.20 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 1

Sum 11.33 14.00 2.40 2.4

Sum * PV 1.24 0.88 0.99 0.99
Lambda - Max n
4.10 4
CI 0.034
CR 0.026

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.20
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.3333333333 0.33
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1

Sum 10.00 8 2.6666666667 2.53

Sum * PV 1.06 0.97 0.97 1.04
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.011
CR 0.013

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 1 1 2
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 1 0.5 1

Sum 10 3.333333333 2.8333333333 4.3333333333

Sum * PV 0.991049771 0.991049771 1.0017789231 1.0833812597
Lambda - Max n
4.07 4
CI 0.022
CR 0.025

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 1 1
MANAGING
AGENT 1 1 1 1
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 1 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 1 1 1 1

Sum 4 4 4 4
Sum * PV 1 1 1 1
Lambda - Max n
4 4
CI 0
CR 0

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 3 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 1.7333333333 4.666666667 10 10

Sum * PV 0.9669653378 1.164261661 0.9632537023 0.9632537023
Lambda - Max n
4.0577344032 4
CI 0.0192448011
CR 0.0213831123

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1.000 0.3333333333 0.333
MANAGING
AGENT 1 1 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 8 12.00 2.5333333333 2.53

Sum * PV 0.93 1.08 1.01 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.0230499229 4
CI 0.0076833076
CR 0.0085370085

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 2 5.00 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.50 1 2.00 2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.5 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.5 1 1

Sum 1.90 4 9.00 9.00

Sum * PV 1.02 0.96 1.02 1.02
Lambda - Max n
4.01 4
CI 0.00
CR 0.00
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.59 0.11

0.34 0.06

2.24 0.41

2.24 0.41
5.40 1

4.10

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.51 0.11

0.58 0.12

1.73 0.36

1.97 0.41
4.79 1
 4.03

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.43869134 0.099

1.31607401 0.297

1.56508458 0.354

1.10668192 0.250
4.42653185 1

4.06725972

Priority
4th Root Vector

1 0.250

1 0.250
 1 0.250

1 0.250
4 1

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.94283096 0.558

1.31607401 0.249

0.50813275 0.096

0.50813275 0.096
5.27517047 1

4.0577344
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.577 0.116

0.447 0.090

1.96798967 0.397

1.96798967 0.397
4.961 1

4.02

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.66 0.53

1.19 0.24

0.56 0.11

0.56 0.11
4.97 1

4.01
R7 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 0.20 0.1428571429
MANAGING
AGENT 0.333 1 0.33 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1

Sum 13.33 12.00 2.53 2.3428571429

Sum * PV 1.35 0.87 0.94 1.07
Lambda - Max n
4.23 4
CI 0.076
CR 0.058

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.2 0.20
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.3333333333 0.33
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1

Sum 12.00 8 2.5333333333 2.53

Sum * PV 1.08 0.93 1.01 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.02 4
CI 0.008
CR 0.009

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1

Sum 14 3.333333333 3.2 3.2

Sum * PV 1.023833325 0.944116528 1.0298145438 1.0298145438
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.009
CR 0.010

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.2 0.3333333333
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 0.5
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 3 2 1

Sum 14 9.333333333 3.4 2.0333333333

Sum * PV 0.9097616628 1.193601037 1.222563237 0.9100260112
Lambda - Max n
4.2359519482 4
CI 0.0786506494
CR 0.0873896104

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 3 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 1.6761904762 4.666666667 10 12

Sum * PV 0.9769135075 1.118207796 0.9251509652 1.0206147567
Lambda - Max n
4.040887025 4
CI 0.0136290083
CR 0.0151433426

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.2 0.143
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1

Sum 16 9.33 2.5333333333 2.34

Sum * PV 0.93 1.16 0.93 1.06
Lambda - Max n
4.074012141 4
CI 0.0246707137
CR 0.0274119041

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5.00 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.33 1 1.50 2.5
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.666666667 1 3.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.4 0.3333333333 1

Sum 1.68 5.066666667 7.83 13.50

Sum * PV 0.99 0.99 1.15 0.92
Lambda - Max n
4.05 4
CI 0.02
CR 0.02
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.54 0.10

0.39 0.07

1.97 0.37

2.43 0.46
5.33 1

4.23

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.45 0.09

0.58 0.12

1.97 0.40

1.97 0.40
4.96 1
 4.02

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.33980885 0.073

1.31607401 0.283

1.49534878 0.322

1.49534878 0.322
4.64658042 1

4.02757894

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.33980885 0.065

0.6687403 0.128
1.88030155 0.360

2.34034732 0.448
5.22919802 1

4.23595195

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.20108587 0.583

1.31607401 0.240

0.50813275 0.093

0.46713798 0.085
5.49243061 1

4.04088703
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.312 0.058

0.669 0.124

1.96798967 0.366

2.43229928 0.452
5.381 1

4.07

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.20 0.59

1.06 0.19

0.80 0.15

0.37 0.07
5.43 1

4.05
R8 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.5 0.33 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 2.000 1 0.20 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 9.00 11.50 2.53 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.88 1.23 1.01 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.13 4
CI 0.043
CR 0.048

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.20
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.2 0.33
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1

Sum 10.00 10 2.5333333333 2.53

Sum * PV 1.03 1.03 1.01 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.07 4
CI 0.022
CR 0.024
 3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.33 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 10 11.33333333 2.5333333333 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.8838815253 1.343965039 1.0045004828 1.0045004828
Lambda - Max n
4.24 4
CI 0.079
CR 0.088

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.3333333333 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 0.3333333333
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 1 1 0.2
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 3 5 1

Sum 12 5.333333333 7.3333333333 1.7333333333

Sum * PV 0.889447703 1.023861065 1.2390291929 0.9792412622
Lambda - Max n
4.13 4
CI 0.044
CR 0.049
 5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 5 5
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.2 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.2 1 1

Sum 1.6761904762 4.4 12 14

Sum * PV 0.9317792441 1.298224209 0.9319413516 0.9995473294
Lambda - Max n
4.161 4
CI 0.05
CR 0.06

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.500 0.3333333333 0.333
MANAGING
AGENT 2 1 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 9 11.50 2.5333333333 2.53

Sum * PV 0.88 1.23 1.01 1.01
 Lambda - Max n
4.1298954207 4
CI 0.0432984736
CR 0.0481094151
 7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5.00 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.33 1 2.00 4
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.5 1 6.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.25 0.1666666667 1

Sum 1.68 4.75 8.17 18.00

Sum * PV 0.95 1.08 1.28 0.89
Lambda - Max n
4.191 4
CI 0.064
CR 0.071
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.49 0.10

0.53 0.11

1.97 0.40

1.97 0.40
4.95 1

4.13

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.51 0.10

0.51 0.10

1.97 0.40

1.97 0.40
4.95 1
4.07
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.43869134 0.088

0.58856619 0.119

1.96798967 0.397

1.96798967 0.397
4.96323687 1

4.23684753

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.3860974 0.074

1 0.192

0.88011174 0.169

2.94283096 0.565
5.20904009 1
4.13157922
 Priority
4th Root Vector

3.20108587 0.556

1.69904424 0.295

0.4472136 0.078

0.41113362 0.071
5.75847733 1

4.16149213

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.485 0.098

0.532 0.107

1.96798967 0.397

1.96798967 0.397
4.953 1

4.13
 Priority
4th Root Vector

3.20 0.57

1.28 0.23

0.88 0.16

0.28 0.05
5.64 1

4.19
R9 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.20 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 1.000 1 0.33 0.33
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1

Sum 10.00 8.00 2.53 2.6666666667

Sum * PV 1.06 0.97 1.04 0.97
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.011
CR 0.013

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.14
MANAGING
AGENT 3.00 1 0.2 0.14
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 7 1 1

Sum 16.00 13.33333333 2.4 2.29

Sum * PV 0.87 1.26 0.94 1.05
Lambda - Max n
4.12 4
CI 0.040
CR 0.044
 3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1

Sum 14 3.333333333 3.2 3.2

Sum * PV 1.023833325 0.944116528 1.0298145438 1.0298145438
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.009
CR 0.010

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 1 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1

Sum 10 4 3.3333333333 3.2

Sum * PV 1.176354241 0.926021198 1.0155936956 1.1077797364
Lambda - Max n
4.23 4
CI 0.075
CR 0.084
 5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 3 5
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.2 1 1

Sum 1.6761904762 4.533333333 10 14

Sum * PV 0.9554692523 1.20713593 0.9048429509 1.0249603063
Lambda - Max n
4.092 4
CI 0.03
CR 0.03

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.2 0.143
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1

Sum 16 9.33 2.5333333333 2.34

Sum * PV 0.93 1.16 0.93 1.06
 Lambda - Max n
4.074012141 4
CI 0.0246707137
CR 0.0274119041
 7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5.00 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.33 1 3.00 5
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.2 1 1

Sum 1.68 4.533333333 10.00 14.00

Sum * PV 0.96 1.21 0.90 1.02
Lambda - Max n
4.092 4
CI 0.031
CR 0.034
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.51 0.11

0.58 0.12

1.97 0.41

1.73 0.36
4.79 1

4.03

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.31 0.05

0.54 0.09

2.24 0.39

2.65 0.46
5.74 1
4.12
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.33980885 0.073

1.31607401 0.283

1.49534878 0.322

1.49534878 0.322
4.64658042 1

4.02757894

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.50813275 0.118

1 0.232

1.31607401 0.305

1.49534878 0.346
4.31955554 1
4.22574887
 Priority
4th Root Vector

3.20108587 0.570

1.49534878 0.266

0.50813275 0.090

0.41113362 0.073
5.61570102 1

4.09240844

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.312 0.058

0.669 0.124

1.96798967 0.366

2.43229928 0.452
5.381 1

4.07
 Priority
4th Root Vector

3.20 0.57

1.50 0.27

0.51 0.09

0.41 0.07
5.62 1

4.09
R10 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.20 0.1428571429
MANAGING
AGENT 3.000 1 0.33 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1

Sum 16.00 9.33 2.53 2.3428571429

Sum * PV 0.93 1.16 0.93 1.06
Lambda - Max n
4.07 4
CI 0.025
CR 0.027

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.20
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.1428571429 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 7 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 1

Sum 10.00 14 2.4761904762 2.40

Sum * PV 0.96 1.09 1.00 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.06 4
CI 0.020
CR 0.022
 3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1

Sum 14 3.333333333 3.2 3.2

Sum * PV 1.023833325 0.944116528 1.0298145438 1.0298145438
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.009
CR 0.010

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.1428571429
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 1 1 1

Sum 16 3.333333333 3.2 3.1428571429

Sum * PV 1.052187373 0.923484237 1.0073094474 1.0761419927
Lambda - Max n
4.06 4
CI 0.020
CR 0.022
 5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 7 9 9
MANAGING
AGENT 0.1428571429 1 3 5
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.1111111111 0.333333333 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1111111111 0.2 1 1

Sum 1.3650793651 8.533333333 14 16

Sum * PV 0.963381306 1.493177935 0.8882426917 0.8934317921
Lambda - Max n
4.238 4
CI 0.08
CR 0.09

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.3333333333 0.200
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.1428571429 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 7 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 1

Sum 12 13.33 2.4761904762 2.40

Sum * PV 0.87 1.36 1.00 1.01
 Lambda - Max n
4.2449422969 4
CI 0.0816474323
CR 0.0907193692
 7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 2 5.00 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.50 1 3.00 5
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 7.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.2 0.1428571429 1

Sum 1.84 3.533333333 9.14 20.00

Sum * PV 0.95 1.04 1.34 0.90
Lambda - Max n
4.228 4
CI 0.076
CR 0.084
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.31 0.06

0.67 0.12

1.97 0.37

2.43 0.45
5.38 1

4.07

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.51 0.10

0.41 0.08

2.14 0.40

2.24 0.42
5.30 1
4.06
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.33980885 0.073

1.31607401 0.283

1.49534878 0.322

1.49534878 0.322
4.64658042 1

4.02757894

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.31239399 0.066

1.31607401 0.277

1.49534878 0.315

1.62657656 0.342
4.75039335 1
4.05912305
 Priority
4th Root Vector

4.87972969 0.706

1.20989674 0.175

0.43869134 0.063

0.3860974 0.056
6.91441515 1

4.23823372

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.386 0.073

0.541 0.102

2.14069514 0.404

2.23606798 0.422
5.304 1

4.24
 Priority
4th Root Vector

2.89 0.51

1.65 0.29

0.83 0.15

0.25 0.04
5.63 1

4.23
R11 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.33 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 1.000 1 0.20 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 8.00 12.00 2.53 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.93 1.08 1.01 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.02 4
CI 0.008
CR 0.006

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.3333333333 0.33
MANAGING
AGENT 3.00 1 0.2 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 10.00 11.33333333 2.5333333333 2.53

Sum * PV 0.88 1.34 1.00 1.00
Lambda - Max n
4.24 4
CI 0.079
CR 0.088
 3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1

Sum 14 3.333333333 3.2 3.2

Sum * PV 1.023833325 0.944116528 1.0298145438 1.0298145438
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.009
CR 0.010

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.3333333333 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1

Sum 12 3.333333333 3.3333333333 3.2

Sum * PV 1.0264920889 0.971933492 0.9719334925 1.0601564708
Lambda - Max n
4.0305155446 4
CI 0.0101718482
CR 0.0113020536
 5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 3 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 1.7333333333 4.666666667 10 10

Sum * PV 0.9669653378 1.164261661 0.9632537023 0.9632537023
Lambda - Max n
4.0577344032 4
CI 0.0192448011
CR 0.0213831123

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.3333333333 0.333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 10 11.33 2.5333333333 2.53

Sum * PV 0.88 1.34 1.00 1.00
 Lambda - Max n
4.2368475298 4
CI 0.0789491766
CR 0.0877213073
 7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 5 3.00 3
MANAGING
AGENT 0.20 1 2.00 2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.3333333333 0.5 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.3333333333 0.5 1 1

Sum 1.87 7 7.00 7.00

Sum * PV 1.00 1.38 0.93 0.93
Lambda - Max n
4.238 4
CI 0.079
CR 0.088
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.58 0.12

0.45 0.09

1.97 0.40

1.97 0.40
4.96 1

4.02

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.44 0.09

0.59 0.12

1.97 0.40

1.97 0.40
4.96 1
4.24
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.33980885 0.073

1.31607401 0.283

1.49534878 0.322

1.49534878 0.322
4.64658042 1

4.02757894

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.3860974 0.086

1.31607401 0.292

1.31607401 0.292

1.49534878 0.331
4.5135942 1
4.03051554
 Priority
4th Root Vector

2.94283096 0.558

1.31607401 0.249

0.50813275 0.096

0.50813275 0.096
5.27517047 1

4.0577344

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.439 0.088

0.589 0.119

1.96798967 0.397

1.96798967 0.397
4.963 1

4.24
 Priority
4th Root Vector

2.59 0.54

0.95 0.20

0.64 0.13

0.64 0.13
4.81 1

4.24
R12 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.20 0.1428571429
MANAGING
AGENT 3.000 1 0.14 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1

Sum 16.00 13.33 2.34 2.3428571429

Sum * PV 0.87 1.26 1.00 1.00
Lambda - Max n
4.13 4
CI 0.043
CR 0.033

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.142857143 0.1428571429 0.14
MANAGING
AGENT 7.00 1 0.2 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1

Sum 22.00 11.14285714 2.3428571429 2.34

Sum * PV 0.88 1.39 0.98 0.98
Lambda - Max n
4.23 4
CI 0.075
CR 0.084

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1

Sum 14 3.333333333 3.2 3.2

Sum * PV 1.023833325 0.944116528 1.0298145438 1.0298145438
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.009
CR 0.010

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.142857143 0.1428571429 0.1428571429
MANAGING
AGENT 7 1 1 1
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 7 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 1 1 1

Sum 22 3.142857143 3.1428571429 3.1428571429

Sum * PV 1 1 1 1
Lambda - Max n
4 4
CI 0
CR 0

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 7 5 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.1428571429 1 0.7 0.7
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 1.428571429 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 1.428571429 1 1

Sum 1.5428571429 10.85714286 7.7 7.7

Sum * PV 0.9996180013 0.994807161 1.0028190025 1.0028190025
Lambda - Max n
4.0000631678 4
CI 2.1055918E-05
CR 2.3395465E-05

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.200 0.2 0.200
MANAGING
AGENT 5 1 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 1

Sum 16 11.20 2.4 2.40

Sum * PV 0.88 1.38 0.99 0.99
Lambda - Max n
4.2294783329 4
CI 0.0764927776
CR 0.0849919751

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 5 3.00 3
MANAGING
AGENT 0.20 1 2.00 2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.3333333333 0.5 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.3333333333 0.5 1 1

Sum 1.87 7 7.00 7.00

Sum * PV 1.00 1.38 0.93 0.93
Lambda - Max n
4.238 4
CI 0.079
CR 0.088
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.31 0.05

0.54 0.09

2.43 0.43

2.43 0.43
5.72 1

4.13

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.23 0.04

0.73 0.12

2.43 0.42

2.43 0.42
5.82 1
 4.23

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.33980885 0.073

1.31607401 0.283

1.49534878 0.322

1.49534878 0.322
4.64658042 1

4.02757894

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.23236808 0.045

1.62657656 0.318
1.62657656 0.318

1.62657656 0.318
5.11209777 1

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.63713576 0.648

0.51436867 0.092

0.73111045 0.130

0.73111045 0.130
5.61372533 1

4.00006317
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.299 0.055

0.669 0.123

2.23606798 0.411

2.23606798 0.411
5.440 1

4.23

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.59 0.54

0.95 0.20

0.64 0.13

0.64 0.13
4.81 1

4.24
R13 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.33 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 3.000 1 0.20 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 10.00 11.33 2.53 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.88 1.34 1.00 1.00
Lambda - Max n
4.24 4
CI 0.079
CR 0.060

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.33
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.2 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 8.00 12 2.5333333333 2.53

Sum * PV 0.93 1.08 1.01 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.02 4
CI 0.008
CR 0.009

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 1 1 1

Sum 10 3.333333333 3.3333333333 3.3333333333

Sum * PV 1 1 1 1
Lambda - Max n
4.00 4
CI 0.000
CR 0.000

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.142857143 0.1428571429 0.1428571429
MANAGING
AGENT 7 1 0.2 0.2
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1

Sum 22 11.14285714 2.3428571429 2.3428571429

Sum * PV 0.8777046932 1.391667036 0.9783901886 0.9783901886
Lambda - Max n
4.2261521062 4
CI 0.0753840354
CR 0.0837600393

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 5 7 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.2 1 2 2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.5 1 1

Sum 1.4857142857 7 11 11
Sum * PV 0.9902213272 1.115259656 0.9580013734 0.9580013734
Lambda - Max n
4.0214837304 4
CI 0.0071612435
CR 0.0079569372

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.2 0.143
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.2 0.1428571429
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 7 1 1

Sum 16 13.33 2.4 2.29

Sum * PV 0.87 1.26 0.94 1.05
Lambda - Max n
4.119531183 4
CI 0.0398437277
CR 0.0442708085

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 5 5.00 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.20 1 3.00 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 1.60 6.666666667 10.00 10.00

Sum * PV 0.97 1.40 0.92 0.92
Lambda - Max n
4.210 4
CI 0.070
CR 0.078
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.44 0.09

0.59 0.12

1.97 0.40

1.97 0.40
4.96 1

4.24

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.58 0.12

0.45 0.09

1.97 0.40

1.97 0.40
4.96 1
 4.02

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.43869134 0.100

1.31607401 0.300

1.31607401 0.300

1.31607401 0.300
4.38691338 1

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.23236808 0.040

0.72742715 0.125
2.43229928 0.418

2.43229928 0.418
5.82439379 1

4.22615211

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.956321 0.666

0.94574161 0.159

0.51697315 0.087

0.51697315 0.087
5.93600892 1

4.02148373
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.312 0.054

0.541 0.094

2.23606798 0.390

2.64575131 0.461
5.735 1

4.12

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.34 0.61

1.16 0.21

0.51 0.09

0.51 0.09
5.52 1

4.21
R14 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.33 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 1.000 1 0.20 0.14
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1

Sum 10.00 14.00 2.53 2.3428571429

Sum * PV 0.96 1.08 0.94 1.07
Lambda - Max n
4.05 4
CI 0.015
CR 0.012

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.20
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.2 0.14
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1

Sum 10.00 14 2.5333333333 2.34

Sum * PV 0.96 1.08 0.94 1.07
Lambda - Max n
4.05 4
CI 0.015
CR 0.017

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.1428571429
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 1 1 1

Sum 16 3.333333333 3.2 3.1428571429

Sum * PV 1.052187373 0.923484237 1.0073094474 1.0761419927
Lambda - Max n
4.06 4
CI 0.020
CR 0.022

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.1428571429
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.2
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 0.5
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 2 1

Sum 16 9.333333333 3.5333333333 1.8428571429

Sum * PV 0.9040948173 1.128978307 1.0576482331 0.9641786311
Lambda - Max n
4.054899989 4
CI 0.0182999963
CR 0.0203333293

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 2 4
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.5 1 7
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.25 0.1428571429 1

Sum 1.6761904762 4.75 8.1428571429 19

Sum * PV 0.9478362789 1.072255856 1.3157214642 0.8970201878
Lambda - Max n
4.2328337868 4
CI 0.0776112623
CR 0.0862347359

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.2 0.143
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1

Sum 16 9.33 2.5333333333 2.34

Sum * PV 0.93 1.16 0.93 1.06
Lambda - Max n
4.074012141 4
CI 0.0246707137
CR 0.0274119041

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5.00 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.33 1 7.00 5
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.142857143 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.2 1 1

Sum 1.68 4.342857143 14.00 14.00

Sum * PV 0.91 1.37 0.98 0.98
Lambda - Max n
4.241 4
CI 0.080
CR 0.089
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.51 0.10

0.41 0.08

1.97 0.37

2.43 0.46
5.32 1

4.05

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.51 0.10

0.41 0.08

1.97 0.37

2.43 0.46
5.32 1
 4.05

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.31239399 0.066

1.31607401 0.277

1.49534878 0.315

1.62657656 0.342
4.75039335 1

4.05912305

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.31239399 0.057

0.6687403 0.121
1.65487546 0.299

2.89250761 0.523
5.52851737 1

4.05489999

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.20108587 0.565

1.27788621 0.226

0.91469122 0.162

0.26726124 0.047
5.66092454 1

4.23283379
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.312 0.058

0.669 0.124

1.96798967 0.366

2.43229928 0.452
5.381 1

4.07

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.20 0.55

1.85 0.31

0.41 0.07

0.41 0.07
5.87 1

4.24
R15 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.142857143 0.20 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 7.000 1 3.00 3.00
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 0 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 16.00 1.81 5.20 5.3333333333

Sum * PV 0.95 0.97 1.12 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.05 4
CI 0.017
CR 0.013

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.33
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.3333333333 0.33
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1

Sum 8.00 8 2.6666666667 2.67

Sum * PV 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lambda - Max n
4.00 4
CI 0.000
CR 0.000

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.1428571429
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 0.3333333333
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 3 1

Sum 16 9.333333333 4.5333333333 1.6761904762

Sum * PV 0.880359876 1.099339564 1.193981884 0.9450575939
Lambda - Max n
4.12 4
CI 0.040
CR 0.044

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 1 1 1

Sum 10 3.333333333 3.3333333333 3.3333333333

Sum * PV 1 1 1 1
Lambda - Max n
4 4
CI -1.4802974E-16
CR -1.6447749E-16

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 3 5
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.2 1 1

Sum 1.7333333333 4.533333333 10 12

Sum * PV 0.9457462362 1.256861351 0.9421160489 0.9950008705
Lambda - Max n
4.1397245062 4
CI 0.0465748354
CR 0.0517498171

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.2 0.143
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1

Sum 16 9.33 2.5333333333 2.34

Sum * PV 0.93 1.16 0.93 1.06
Lambda - Max n
4.074012141 4
CI 0.0246707137
CR 0.0274119041

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 3.00 5
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 3.00 5
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.3333333333 0.333333333 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.2 1 1

Sum 2.53 2.533333333 8.00 12.00

Sum * PV 1.01 1.01 0.93 1.08
Lambda - Max n
4.023 4
CI 0.008
CR 0.009
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.31 0.06

2.82 0.54

1.14 0.22

1.00 0.19
5.27 1

4.05

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.58 0.13

0.58 0.13

1.73 0.38

1.73 0.38
4.62 1
 4.00

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.31239399 0.055

0.6687403 0.118

1.49534878 0.263

3.20108587 0.564
5.67756895 1

4.11873892

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.43869134 0.100

1.31607401 0.300
1.31607401 0.300

1.31607401 0.300
4.38691338 1

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.94283096 0.546

1.49534878 0.277

0.50813275 0.094

0.4472136 0.083
5.39352608 1

4.13972451
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.312 0.058

0.669 0.124

1.96798967 0.366

2.43229928 0.452
5.381 1

4.07

Priority
4th Root Vector

1.97 0.40

1.97 0.40

0.58 0.12

0.45 0.09
4.96 1

4.02
R16 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.33 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 1.000 1 0.33 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 1

Sum 10.00 10.00 2.67 2.4

Sum * PV 1.02 1.02 0.93 1.08
Lambda - Max n
4.04 4
CI 0.014
CR 0.011

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.33
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.3333333333 0.33
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1

Sum 8.00 8 2.6666666667 2.67

Sum * PV 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lambda - Max n
4.00 4
CI 0.000
CR 0.000

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1

Sum 14 7.333333333 2.5333333333 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.9447337612 1.10654181 0.9900608059 0.9900608059
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.010
CR 0.012

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 1 1 0.2 0.2
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 8 12 2.5333333333 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.9311081389 1.081849895 1.0050459447 1.0050459447
Lambda - Max n
4.0230499229 4
CI 0.0076833076
CR 0.0085370085

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 7 9 9
MANAGING
AGENT 0.1428571429 1 2 2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.1111111111 0.5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1111111111 0.5 1 1

Sum 1.3650793651 9 13 13
Sum * PV 0.9912298641 1.164404054 0.9391737331 0.9391737331
Lambda - Max n
4.0339813845 4
CI 0.0113271282
CR 0.012585698

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.200 0.1428571429 0.143
MANAGING
AGENT 5 1 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 5 1 1

Sum 20 11.20 2.3428571429 2.34

Sum * PV 0.87 1.29 0.98 0.98
Lambda - Max n
4.1378747031 4
CI 0.0459582344
CR 0.0510647049

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5.00 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.33 1 5.00 5
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.2 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.2 1 1

Sum 1.68 4.4 12.00 14.00

Sum * PV 0.93 1.30 0.93 1.00
Lambda - Max n
4.16 4
CI 0.05
CR 0.06
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.51 0.10

0.51 0.10

1.73 0.35

2.24 0.45
4.98 1

4.04

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.58 0.13

0.58 0.13

1.73 0.38

1.73 0.38
4.62 1
 4.00

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.33980885 0.067

0.75983569 0.151

1.96798967 0.391

1.96798967 0.391
5.03562388 1

4.03139718

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.57735027 0.116

0.4472136 0.090
1.96798967 0.397

1.96798967 0.397
4.96054321 1

4.02304992

Priority
4th Root Vector

4.87972969 0.726

0.86944174 0.129

0.48549177 0.072

0.48549177 0.072
6.72015497 1

4.03398138
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.253 0.044

0.669 0.116

2.43229928 0.420

2.43229928 0.420
5.786 1

4.14

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.20 0.56

1.70 0.30

0.45 0.08

0.41 0.07
5.76 1

4.16
R17 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.33 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 1.000 1 0.20 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 8.00 12.00 2.53 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.93 1.08 1.01 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.02 4
CI 0.008
CR 0.009

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.20
MANAGING
AGENT 3.00 1 0.1428571429 0.14
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1

Sum 14.00 15.33333333 2.3428571429 2.34

Sum * PV 0.83 1.34 1.00 1.00
Lambda - Max n
4.17 4
CI 0.057
CR 0.063

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.2 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 5 1 1 1
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1

Sum 16 3.2 3.2 3.2

Sum * PV 1 1 1 1
Lambda - Max n
4.00 4
CI 0.000
CR 0.000

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1

Sum 14 3.333333333 3.2 3.2

Sum * PV 1.023833325 0.944116528 1.0298145438 1.0298145438
Lambda - Max n
4.028 4
CI 0.009
CR 0.010

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 5 7 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.2 1 3 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.333333333 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 1.4857142857 6.666666667 12 12

Sum * PV 0.9717424954 1.276589424 0.9267248256 0.9267248256
Lambda - Max n
4.102 4
CI 0.034
CR 0.038

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1.000 0.2 0.200
MANAGING
AGENT 1 1 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1

Sum 12 8.00 2.5333333333 2.53

Sum * PV 1.08 0.93 1.01 1.01
Lambda - Max n
4.023 4
CI 0.008
CR 0.009

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 5 7.00 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.20 1 2.00 2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.5 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.5 1 1

Sum 1.49 7 11.00 11.00

Sum * PV 0.99 1.12 0.96 0.96
Lambda - Max n
4.02 4
CI 0.01
CR 0.01
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.58 0.12

0.45 0.09

1.97 0.40

1.97 0.40
4.96 1

4.02

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.34 0.06

0.50 0.09

2.43 0.43

2.43 0.43
5.70 1
 4.17

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.29906976 0.063

1.49534878 0.313

1.49534878 0.313

1.49534878 0.313
4.7851161 1

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.33980885 0.073

1.31607401 0.283
1.49534878 0.322

1.49534878 0.322
4.64658042 1

4.02757894

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.956321 0.654

1.15829219 0.191

0.46713798 0.077

0.46713798 0.077
6.04888914 1

4.10178157
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.447 0.090

0.577 0.116

1.96798967 0.397

1.96798967 0.397
4.961 1

4.02

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.96 0.67

0.95 0.16

0.52 0.09

0.52 0.09
5.94 1

4.02
R19 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each factor

Preferability scale

1 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.33 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 1.000 1 0.20 0.14
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1

Sum 10.00 14.00 2.53 2.3428571429

Sum * PV 0.96 1.08 0.94 1.07
Lambda - Max n
4.05 4
CI 0.015
CR 0.017

2 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.2 0.20
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.1428571429 0.14
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 7 1 1

Sum 12.00 16 2.3428571429 2.34

Sum * PV 0.94 1.06 1.00 1.00
Lambda - Max n
4.01 4
CI 0.003
CR 0.003

3 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.1428571429
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 7 3 1 1

Sum 16 7.333333333 2.5333333333 2.4761904762

Sum * PV 0.9647532121 1.075510582 0.9622961043 1.0231338371
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.009
CR 0.010

4 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 1 1
 MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 1 1 1

Sum 14 3.333333333 3.2 3.2

Sum * PV 1.023833325 0.944116528 1.0298145438 1.0298145438
Lambda - Max n
4.028 4
CI 0.009
CR 0.010

5 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.3333333333 1 3 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 1.7333333333 4.666666667 10 10

Sum * PV 0.9669653378 1.164261661 0.9632537023 0.9632537023
Lambda - Max n
4.058 4
CI 0.019
CR 0.021

6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

 CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM
CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1.000 0.3333333333 0.200
MANAGING
AGENT 1 1 0.3333333333 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 0.3333333333
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 5 3 1

Sum 10 10.00 4.6666666667 1.73

Sum * PV 0.96 0.96 1.16 0.97
Lambda - Max n
4.058 4
CI 0.019
CR 0.021

7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5.00 5
MANAGING
AGENT 0.33 1 3.00 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 1.73 4.666666667 10.00 10.00

Sum * PV 0.97 1.16 0.96 0.96
Lambda - Max n
4.06 4
CI 0.02
CR 0.02
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.51 0.10

0.41 0.08

1.97 0.37

2.43 0.46
5.32 1

4.05

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.45 0.08

0.38 0.07

2.43 0.43

2.43 0.43
5.69 1
 4.01

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.31239399 0.060

0.75983569 0.147

1.96798967 0.380

2.14069514 0.413
5.18091449 1

4.02569374

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.33980885 0.073

1.31607401 0.283
1.49534878 0.322

1.49534878 0.322
4.64658042 1

4.02757894

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.94283096 0.558

1.31607401 0.249

0.50813275 0.096

0.50813275 0.096
5.27517047 1

4.0577344
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.508 0.096

0.508 0.096

1.31607401 0.249

2.94283096 0.558
5.275 1

4.06

Priority
4th Root Vector

2.94 0.56

1.32 0.25

0.51 0.10

0.51 0.10
5.28 1

4.06
R20 Note : Matrices based on the scale of preferability of one route against the other under each fact

Preferability scale

Q6 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON COST

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR
CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 3 5.00 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.333 1 5.00 7.00
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.2 0 1 3
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.142857143 0.3333333333 1

Sum 1.68 4.34 11.33 18

Sum * PV 0.91 1.35 1.13 0.87
Lambda - Max n
4.26 4
CI 0.086
CR 0.096

Q7 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON RISK SHARING

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.20
MANAGING
AGENT 1.00 1 0.3333333333 0.20
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 5 1 1

Sum 10.00 10 2.6666666667 2.40

Sum * PV 1.02 1.02 0.93 1.08
Lambda - Max n
4.04 4
CI 0.014
CR 0.016

Q8 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333333333 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1

Sum 14 7.333333333 2.5333333333 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.9447337612 1.10654181 0.9900608059 0.9900608059
Lambda - Max n
4.03 4
CI 0.010
CR 0.012

Q9 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON QUALITY SERVICE

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 1 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
AGENT 1 1 0.2 0.2
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 3 5 1 1

Sum 8 12 2.5333333333 2.5333333333

Sum * PV 0.9311081389 1.081849895 1.0050459447 1.0050459447
Lambda - Max n
4.023 4
CI 0.008
CR 0.009

Q10 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON DESIRED CONTROL

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 5 7 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.2 1 3 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.333333333 1 1
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 1.4857142857 6.666666667 12 12

Sum * PV 0.9717424954 1.276589424 0.9267248256 0.9267248256
Lambda - Max n
4.102 4
CI 0.034
CR 0.038

Q11 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON MANAGEMENT SKILLS (CLIENT)

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 0.333 0.2 0.200
MANAGING
AGENT 3 1 0.3333333333 0.3333333333
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1
 TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 5 3 1 1

Sum 14 7.33 2.5333333333 2.53

Sum * PV 0.94 1.11 0.99 0.99
Lambda - Max n
4.031 4
CI 0.010
CR 0.012

Q12 COMPARISON MATRIX BASED ON SUPPLIERS MARKET

CLIENT DIRECT MANAGING MANAGING TOTAL FM

CONTRACTING AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR

CLIENT DIRECT
CONTRACTING 1 5 7.00 7
MANAGING
AGENT 0.20 1 3.00 3
MANAGING
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.333333333 1 1.00
TOTAL FM
CONTRACTOR 0.1428571429 0.333333333 1 1

Sum 1.49 6.666666667 12.00 12.00

Sum * PV 0.97 1.28 0.93 0.93
Lambda - Max n
4.10 4
CI 0.03
CR 0.04
t the other under each factor

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.20 0.54

1.85 0.31

0.59 0.10

0.29 0.05
5.92 1

4.26

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.51 0.10

0.51 0.10

1.73 0.35

2.24 0.45
4.98 1

4.04
 Priority
4th Root Vector

0.33980885 0.067

0.75983569 0.151

1.96798967 0.391

1.96798967 0.391
5.03562388 1

4.03139718

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.57735027 0.116

0.4472136 0.090

1.96798967 0.397

1.96798967 0.397
4.96054321 1
4.02304992

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.956321 0.654

1.15829219 0.191

0.46713798 0.077

0.46713798 0.077
6.04888914 1

4.10178157

Priority
4th Root Vector

0.340 0.067

0.760 0.151

1.96798967 0.391
1.96798967 0.391
5.036 1

4.03

Priority
4th Root Vector

3.96 0.65

1.16 0.19

0.47 0.08

0.47 0.08
6.05 1

4.10