Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Edition
Chapter 12
CHAPTER 12
A lesson in accrued depreciation should cover the following topics:
12.1 Depreciation Defined
12.2 Types and Causes of Accrued Depreciation
12.3 Methods of Measuring Accrued Depreciation
12.4 Cost Approach Summary
Class Activities
[Instructor: Complete as needed.]
Lecture [ ] Discussion [ ] Breakout Groups [ ] Other _____________ [ ]
Depreciation is both an accounting term and an appraisal term.
Depreciation assumes a gradual “wasting away” of the value of an asset.
For real estate, accounting depreciation is allowed only on the improvements.
It is usually calculated on the historical acquisition cost, or “cost basis” of the improvements.
Example 12.1 Accounting Depreciation
Purchase price: $275,000
Less: Land value 65,000
Equals: Building cost basis $210,000
Divided by: Depreciation period ÷ 40 years
Equals: Annual depreciation $ 5,250
121
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
Depreciation is deducted from reproduction or replacement cost new on the date of value, rather
than historical cost.
The amount deducted is the appraiser’s best estimate of the actual loss in market value.
Depreciation is the difference between the cost new of the improvements and their market value,
as of the valuation date. This difference is also referred to as diminished utility.
Cost Approach — To estimate the value contribution of the improvements.
1. Depreciated improvement value is added to the land value.
2. Total property value by the cost approach is the result.
3. The exact amounts deducted for depreciation depend on whether replacement cost
estimates or reproduction cost estimates have been used.
Example 12.2 Appraisal Depreciation
Reproduction cost new: $150,000
Less: Estimated accrued depreciation (say, 10%) 15,000
Equals: Reproduction cost less accrued depreciation $135,000
Plus: Land value +170,000
Equals: Total indicated value of the property $305,000
Other Approaches — Depreciation estimates assist the appraiser in adjusting for age differences in
market and income studies.
1. Physical deterioration
2. Functional obsolescence
3. Economic or external obsolescence (also called locational)
122
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
Each could be either curable or incurable. Curable depreciation means that the cost to fix the problem is
equal to or less than the value that would be gained.
Physical Deterioration
Physical deterioration is the wear and tear that a building suffers from use, age, neglect, and the elements.
It can be either curable or incurable.
This refers to conditions that are economically feasible to correct: the correction would add at least as
much to the value as the cost of the repairs.
123
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
Incurable physical deterioration describes building conditions that are likely to cost more to repair than
the value that is added. There are two types:
Shortlived incurable: partially usedup items too good to replace now (for example, air conditioning
systems). Also called curable postponed. When ready to replace, the loss in value is considered to be
curable.
Longlived incurable: basic structural components. This is value loss attributed to the age of the
building’s major components.
Gradual aging of the foundation, framework, plumbing, fixtures or electrical
wiring, etc.
Why incurable? The cost to repair is more than the value that would be added.
Functional Obsolescence
Functional obsolescence describes a loss of utility that results from some aspect of the improvements.
Problems associated with functional obsolescence include:
Faulty design or floor plan
Misplaced improvement (i.e. out of place)
Underimprovement (inadequacy)
Overimprovement (superadequacy)
Outmoded equipment
Functional obsolescence can be curable or incurable.
Curable—where the correction cost is less than the benefit in increased market value
Incurable—where the cost is greater than the benefit
Economic (external) obsolescence is loss in value caused by factors located outside the subject property.
Examples:
Environmental hazards
Changes in the highest and best use, or zoning changes
Inharmonious nearby land uses
124
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
Appraisers should take care not to estimate a land value that also reflects economic or external
obsolescence, otherwise deducting the same from the improvement cost new would be doublecounting.
125
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
There are four methods of measuring accrued depreciation.
This method is based upon the theory that all buildings have a useful life expectancy, referred to as the
“economic life.” Economic life is usually less than physical life. The annual loss in value is proportional
to the total useful life of improvements.
Value loss can be based on either actual or effective age. If actual age is used, unwarranted depreciation
may result. If effective age is used, care is needed to arrive at a supportable number!
[Instructor: In the following, we have revised the text examples to show significantly different
results using actual vs. effective age.]
1. Example based on actual age: A 50year old residence with an economic life of 100 years:
Age 50 years
Divided by: Economic life ÷ 100 years
Equals: Accrued depreciation 50%
2. Example using effective age: A 50year old building with an effective age of 25 years, and a
100year economic life:
Age, 50 years, but effective age 25 years
Divided by: Economic life ÷ 100 years
Equals: Accrued depreciation 25%
Many published depreciation tables are based on agelife concepts.
Limitations of the agelife method:
Economic life is at best a judgment as to what the market expects.
Explicit adjustments for deferred maintenance or other problems frequently will be
needed.
Effective age is also quite subjective. Different appraisers rarely reach estimates of
effective age that are similar.
Despite its limitations, the agelife method is used most often by appraisers because of its simplicity.
126
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
This method uses market sales to estimate the loss in value. If old buildings are worth less than new
buildings, they will sell for less. Follow these steps:
1. Estimate the land value for each improved comparable.
2. Abstract the building value portion of your improved comparable sale price, by subtracting the
land value from the selling price.
3. Estimate the cost new for the improvements of each comparable sale as of the sale date.
4. Deduct the abstracted building value from the cost new.
5. The difference is the accrued market depreciation; expressed as a percentage of cost new.
6. To account for age differences, solve for annual depreciation.
Reproduction cost new of improvements $200,000
Less: Improvement value:
Sales price: $240,000
Less: Land value 80,000
Equals: Improvement value () $160,000
Equals: Accrued depreciation $ 40,000
Divided by: Cost new of improvements ÷ $200,000
Equals: Value loss as a decimal 0.20
Value loss as a percent 20%
Divided by: Age of improvements (in years) ÷ 20
Equals: Annual percent depreciation 1%
Each defect or condition is first classified as being physical, functional, or economic depreciation.
Each also must be classified as economically curable, if the market value loss is greater than the
cost to cure, or incurable if the cost to cure is greater.
Note that this method is often used to estimate the depreciation for a specific problem. It is rarely
used as the sole method to calculate depreciation, due to its complexity.
Physical Deterioration
127
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
All of the building components belong to one of three categories:
Items with deferred maintenance (curable or incurable)
Shortlived components
Longlived components
The steps in calculating the depreciation deduction for physical deterioration are:
1. Estimate the cost new as of the value date for each building component or category to be
analyzed. Separate them into the three categories.
2. Estimate and subtract depreciation due to the cost to cure the deferred maintenance.
3. Estimate and subtract the depreciation for the short-lived items. Multiply the cost new of each
short-lived item by the percentage of useful life already used up.
4. Deduct the cost new of the deferred maintenance items and the short-lived items from the total
cost new. The balance is the cost new for the long-lived components.
5. For each long-lived component, calculate the percentage of useful life already used up. Divide the
actual age of the component on the value date by its total estimated life.
6. Multiply the estimated cost new of each component times the percentage of useful life already
used up.
7. Total the depreciations for each component, to get the total physical depreciation for the long-
lived components.
Functional Obsolescence
[Instructor: This material on functional obsolescence is complex and difficult for many students.
We believe that it is helpful to put it in this context: many appraisers never have occasion to need
to use any of these methods. Few appraisers use them even once a year. But when the appraiser
needs to use them, it is vital to remember that they exist and can be looked up in a textbook.]
Five categories of functional obsolescence:
1. Curable functional obsolescence – an addition
2. Curable functional obsolescence – a replacement or substitution
3. Curable functional obsolescence – a superadequacy
4. Incurable functional obsolescence – a deficiency
5. Incurable functional obsolescence – a superadequacy
[Instructor: We suggest reviewing the text examples for each category and asking class
members for additional examples.]
128
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
Calculating Functional Obsolescence
1. Identify the functional problems.
2. Separate the functional problems into the three categories:
Deficiencies (missing components)
needed replacements
superadequacies
3. Estimate the market value impact of each problem:
the loss in value from deficiencies or needed replacements
the increase or loss in value from superadequacies
4. For deficiencies:
estimate the cost new to install the needed component on the date of value
estimate the cost new to install the component as if it had been part of the original
construction
if the market value loss is greater than the cost to install, the problem is curable. The cost to
install, less the cost new to install if it was part of the original construction, is the
depreciation deduction.
if the market value loss is less, the problem is incurable. The market value loss, less the cost
new to install if it was part of the original construction, is the deduction
5. For replacements:
estimate the cost new on the date of value to replace the deficient component (the “cost to
cure”)
estimate the cost new on the date of value if the replacement component was part of the
original construction
calculate the cost new less physical deterioration for the deficient component
if the market value loss is greater than the cost to replace, the problem is curable. The
depreciation deduction is calculated as the cost to replace the old component, less the cost
new to install the new component as if part of the original construction, and plus the deficient
component’s cost new less physical deterioration
if the market value loss is less, the problem is incurable. The depreciation deduction is the
market value loss, less the cost new to install the new component as if part of the original
building, and plus the deficient component’s cost less physical deterioration
6. For superadequacies:
can the original component be removed?
at what cost?
has it any salvage value?
if the market value loss is greater than the cost to remove the item (net of salvage value), the
problem is curable, otherwise it is incurable.
129
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
if you are using replacement cost, the deduction for functional obsolescence is the cost to
cure if the problem is curable, or the market value loss if it is incurable.
if you are using reproduction cost, the calculation is more complex. First, calculate the cost
new on the date of value of the existing component. If the obsolescence is curable, deduct
from the cost new any physical deterioration previously charged, add back the cost to cure,
and deduct the cost new of the replacement component as if it had been installed as a part of
the original building.
for incurable obsolescence using replacement cost, start with the cost new of the existing
component, deduct any physical deterioration previously charged, add the market value loss,
and deduct the cost new of the replacement component as if it had been installed as a part of
the original building.
[Instructor: Again, examples are helpful! My favorite superadequacy problem was an 800
square foot 2 bedroom 1920s home in average condition, with no particular remodeling except a
threeyearold $5,000 commercial stove!]
This method applies when the value of a property can be related to the income it produces. Loss in value
can be estimated either:
a. In total, that is from all causes, or
b. In part, from a single cause.
1210
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
The total loss can be estimated using the gross income multiplier method of income capitalization.
Assume a 200 monthly multiplier.
Monthly rental of new competitive property $ 1,450
Less: Monthly rental of subject property 1,150
Equals: Rental loss amount $300
Multiplied by: Gross rent multiplier x 200
Equals: Accrued depreciation $60,000
The total loss in value can also be estimated using net income capitalization:
a. Estimate the building value of the subject property by capitalizing the income that can be
attributed to the improvements.
b. Subtract the estimated building value from the cost new.
c. The result is the estimated loss in value.
[Instructor: The capitalized income method is covered in detail in Chapters 13 and 14.]
Estimating the loss in value from a single cause (whether physical, functional, or external depreciation):
a. Estimate the rental loss that results from the defect or cause.
b. Capitalize the rental loss, using either a gross income multiplier or a net income capitalization
technique.
A poor floor plan causes a loss of rent of $150 per month.
A gross income multiplier of 200 is derived from study of market sales.
The depreciation deduction is calculated as: $150 x 200 = $30,000
1211
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
A cost approach summary example is given below, from your text.
Physical deterioration:
curable $10,000
incurable 5,000
Functional obsolescence:
curable (old-style kitchen) 6,000
incurable (poor floor plan) 5,000
Economic obsolescence:
(adjacent to commercial) 10,000
Total accrued depreciation – $36,000
SUMMARY
[Instructor: The list of important terms may assist in the summary.]
1212
Instructor’s Manual: Basic Real Estate Appraisal, 8th. Edition
Chapter 12
Physical deterioration Superadequacy
Loss of utility Rent loss method Underimprovement
Misplaced improvement Sales data method
Overimprovement Straightline method
[Instructor: See end of your text chapter for these review questions.]
STUDENT EXERCISES
[Instructor: Suggested Multiple Choice and True/False questions are available to use for Chapter
12.]
1213