Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Lab 1
1. Objective
The objective of lab 1, Graph Matching, is to study the motion of a student walking
across the room, in order to help us understand the concepts of kinematics. Through the
use of graphs we were to predict, sketch, and test position, as well as velocity, verses
timed kinematic graphs. Using a motion detector that measures the time it takes for a
frequency sound pulse to travel from the detector to the student and back, is how we can
determine the position of the student.
2. Equipment List
Computer
Lab Station 1
Sonia Flores: Lab Partner (Participation 5)
Logger Pro Program
LabQuest Mini
Vernier Motion Detector
1m and 2m meter sticks
Masking Tape
3. Preliminary Questions
I agree with Sonia for most of her lines except for her “accelerating in a positive direction from
rest”. Her lines do not indicate a period of rest (if the rest is there I can barely see it) and also
begin to “level out”, “arc”, or stop moving in a steep upward motion when the object should be
accelerating. Our graphs are very similar except hers are much more zoomed in than mine, this is
possibly due to not hitting “auto-scale”.
4.7. We then repeated all of the steps to make the velocity graph (see graph below). This
graph was very similar to the prediction graph if we were to “auto-scale” or zoom out. I
was not expecting the objects at a constant speed to “arc” at the end in my prediction, I
was expecting the line to continue up in a positive motion for the duration of the time.
Graph C
4.11. We then opened file “01c Graph Matching” and repeated the process using a
new target graph. Please see the graph (D) below.
Graph D
Part III: Velocity vs. Time Graph Matching
4.12. In Logger Pro we opened the file “01d Graph Matching” from the Physics with
Vernier folder.
4.13. Sonia and I discussed how we would walk to produce the graph shown.
4.14. We then pressed the “collect” button and walked in a way that the graph of our
motion matches the target graph on the computer screen. It took us many tries to
“match” the graph, below (E) is our best attempt.
Graph E
4.15. In Logger Pro we opened the file “01e Graph Matching” from the Physics with
Vernier folder.
4.16. Sonia and I discussed how we would walk to produce the graph shown.
4.17. We then pressed the “collect” button and walked in a way that the graph of our
motion matches the target graph on the computer screen. It took us many tries to
“match” the graph, below (F) is our best attempt.
Graph F
4.18. We then removed the masking tape from the floor and put away all of the
equipment that we used.
7. My lab partner did the same thing and challenged me to match a graph that she drew, the
results are depicted in the graph below.
8. We completed more challenges using a velocity vs time challenges as well in the same
manner as above (for some reason we couldn’t get the graph to be labeled as velocity vs
time but that was what is shown). Below is my challenge shown in the graph, followed by
sonia’s challenge.
My Challenge (velocity vs. time):