no name Year of phase Flow regime Type and Methods

publication congfiguration
1. A Simplified February two-phase bubbly flow, analysis of Govier et al,
Model for 1999 oil/water pseudoslug two-phase pioneering
Oil/Water flow, and oil/water flow work, which
Flow in churn flow in vertical was
Vertical and and deviated subsequently
Deviated systems, on adapted by
Wellbores water- Govier and
dominated Aziz,2
flow established a
regimes, flow-pattern
where the map for
patterns may vertical
be termed as oil/water
bubbly flow, flow. Using
pseudoslug the drift-flux
flow, and approach
churn flow and and the
A drift-flux Govier/Aziz
approach is flow-pattern
taken to map, Hasan
analyze the and Kabir7
flow behavior presented a
of oil/water model for
systems. For vertical
the three flow liquid/liquid
regimes flow.
investigated,
the drift
velocity of the
lighter oil
phase is
found to be
dependent on
its in-situ
volume
fraction in
addition to
the terminal
bubble- or
droplet-rise
velocity. For
flow in both
vertical and
deviated pipes
2. A 28–31 two-phase two-phase the Vogel,
Comparison March 1999. flow performance Fetkovich,
of Two- of oil wells, it Jones, Blount
Phase Inflow is often and Glaze,
Performance assumed that Klins and
Relationships production Majcher, and
rates are Sukarno
proportional
to pressure
drawdown.
This straight-
line
relationship
can be derived
from
Darcy’s law for
steady-state
flow of a
single,
incompressible
fluid and is
called the
productivity
index (PI).