Welcome to Minitab, press F1 for help.

MTB > OneWay;

SUBC> Response 'PROTEIN';
SUBC> Categorical 'PERLAKUAN';
SUBC> IType 0;
SUBC> Tukey 5;
SUBC> GMCI;
SUBC> TGrouping;
SUBC> GIntPlot;
SUBC> TMethod;
SUBC> TFactor;
SUBC> TANOVA;
SUBC> TSummary;
SUBC> TMeans;
SUBC> Nodefault.

One-way ANOVA: PROTEIN versus PERLAKUAN

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal

Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different
Significance level α = 0,05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

PERLAKUAN 5 0; 1; 2; 3; 4

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

PERLAKUAN 4 1,69565 0,423914 125,18 0,000
Error 5 0,01693 0,003386
Total 9 1,71259

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

0,0581931 99,01% 98,22% 96,05%

Means

PERLAKUAN N Mean StDev 95% CI

0 2 3,6354 0,0324 (3,5296; 3,7412)
1 2 2,7015 0,0735 (2,5957; 2,8072)
2 2 2,8170 0,0624 (2,7112; 2,9228)
3 2 2,4661 0,0326 (2,3604; 2,5719)
4 2 2,6038 0,0744 (2,4980; 2,7096)

Pooled StDev = 0,0581931

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

PERLAKUAN N Mean Grouping

0 2 3,6354 A
2 2 2,8170 B
1 2 2,7015 B
4 2 2,6038 B C
3 2 2,4661 C

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

Interval Plot of PROTEIN vs PERLAKUAN

MTB >

————— 16/08/2018 17:46:55 ————————————————

————

Welcome to Minitab, press F1 for help.

MTB > OneWay;

SUBC> Response 'Total gula';
SUBC> Categorical 'perlakuan';
SUBC> IType 0;
SUBC> Tukey 5;
SUBC> GMCI;
SUBC> TGrouping;
SUBC> GIntPlot;
SUBC> TMethod;
SUBC> TFactor;
SUBC> TANOVA;
SUBC> TSummary;
SUBC> TMeans;
SUBC> Nodefault.

One-way ANOVA: Total gula versus perlakuan

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal

Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different
Significance level α = 0,05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

perlakuan 5 0; 1; 2; 3; 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

perlakuan 4 41,322 10,331 7,35 0,025
Error 5 7,026 1,405
Total 9 48,348

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

1,18541 85,47% 73,84% 41,87%

Means

perlakuan N Mean StDev 95% CI

0 2 42,669 0,277 (40,515; 44,824)
1 2 40,259 0,167 (38,105; 42,414)
2 2 44,857 0,272 (42,702; 47,012)
3 2 45,848 0,426 (43,694; 48,003)
4 2 45,05 2,58 ( 42,89; 47,20)

Pooled StDev = 1,18541

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

perlakuan N Mean Grouping

3 2 45,848 A
4 2 45,05 A
2 2 44,857 A B
0 2 42,669 A B
1 2 40,259 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

Interval Plot of Total gula vs perlakuan

MTB >

MTB > OneWay;

SUBC> Response 'TITIK LELEH';
SUBC> Categorical 'perlakuan';
SUBC> IType 0;
SUBC> Tukey 5;
SUBC> GMCI;
SUBC> TGrouping;
SUBC> GIntPlot;
SUBC> TMethod;
SUBC> TFactor;
SUBC> TANOVA;
SUBC> TSummary;
SUBC> TMeans;
SUBC> Nodefault.

One-way ANOVA: TITIK LELEH versus perlakuan

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal

Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different
Significance level α = 0,05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

perlakuan 5 0; 1; 2; 3; 4

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

perlakuan 4 1,400 0,3500 1,17 0,425
Error 5 1,500 0,3000
Total 9 2,900

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

0,547723 48,28% 6,90% 0,00%

Means

perlakuan N Mean StDev 95% CI

0 2 8,500 0,707 (7,504; 9,496)
1 2 9,000 0,000 (8,004; 9,996)
2 2 8,500 0,707 (7,504; 9,496)
3 2 9,000 0,000 (8,004; 9,996)
4 2 9,500 0,707 (8,504; 10,496)

Pooled StDev = 0,547723

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

perlakuan N Mean Grouping

4 2 9,500 A
3 2 9,000 A
1 2 9,000 A
2 2 8,500 A
0 2 8,500 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

Interval Plot of TITIK LELEH vs perlakuan

MTB >

MTB > OneWay;

SUBC> Response 'pH';
SUBC> Categorical 'perlakuan';
SUBC> IType 0;
SUBC> Tukey 5;
SUBC> GMCI;
SUBC> TGrouping;
SUBC> GIntPlot;
SUBC> TMethod;
SUBC> TFactor;
SUBC> TANOVA;
SUBC> TSummary;
SUBC> TMeans;
SUBC> Nodefault.

One-way ANOVA: pH versus perlakuan

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal

Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different
Significance level α = 0,05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

perlakuan 5 0; 1; 2; 3; 4

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

perlakuan 4 0,11600 0,029000 7,25 0,026
Error 5 0,02000 0,004000
Total 9 0,13600

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

0,0632456 85,29% 73,53% 41,18%

Means

perlakuan N Mean StDev 95% CI

0 2 5,3500 0,0707 (5,2350; 5,4650)
1 2 5,400 0,000 ( 5,285; 5,515)
2 2 5,4500 0,0707 (5,3350; 5,5650)
3 2 5,6500 0,0707 (5,5350; 5,7650)
4 2 5,5500 0,0707 (5,4350; 5,6650)

Pooled StDev = 0,0632456

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

perlakuan N Mean Grouping

3 2 5,6500 A
4 2 5,5500 A B
2 2 5,4500 A B
1 2 5,400 A B
0 2 5,3500 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

Interval Plot of pH vs perlakuan

MTB >

MTB > OneWay;

SUBC> Response 'VITAMIN C';
SUBC> Categorical 'perlakuan';
SUBC> IType 0;
SUBC> Tukey 5;
SUBC> GMCI;
SUBC> TGrouping;
SUBC> GIntPlot;
SUBC> TMethod;
SUBC> TFactor;
SUBC> TANOVA;
SUBC> TSummary;
SUBC> TMeans;
SUBC> Nodefault.

One-way ANOVA: VITAMIN C versus perlakuan

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal

Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different
Significance level α = 0,05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information
Factor Levels Values
perlakuan 5 0; 1; 2; 3; 4

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

perlakuan 4 0,000882 0,000221 195,57 0,000
Error 5 0,000006 0,000001
Total 9 0,000888

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

0,0010621 99,36% 98,86% 97,46%

Means

perlakuan N Mean StDev 95% CI

0 2 0,01420 0,00000 ( 0,01227; 0,01613)
1 2 0,033100 0,001131 (0,031169; 0,035031)
2 2 0,02230 0,00156 ( 0,02037; 0,02423)
3 2 0,040600 0,001273 (0,038669; 0,042531)
4 2 0,021000 0,000566 (0,019069; 0,022931)

Pooled StDev = 0,00106207

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

perlakuan N Mean Grouping

3 2 0,040600 A
1 2 0,033100 B
2 2 0,02230 C
4 2 0,021000 C
0 2 0,01420 D

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

Interval Plot of VITAMIN C vs perlakuan

MTB >