Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Former West Virginia Circuit Judge, Michael Thorsnbury, was actively engaged in
multiple criminal conspiracies wherein he willfully violated the constitutional rights of his
victim, White (Supreme Court, 2013). Thornsbury was charged with two “…felony violations of
Title 18, United States Code, Section 241: conspiracy to violate a person’s civil rights” (Supreme
Court, 2013, p. 10). Thornsbury is serving his sentence in a federal prison located in Florida;
however, he is scheduled for release in March of 2017. This paper is written to provide an
account of the circumstances related to criminal injustice while examining the professional and
ethical canons to which judges are held. Cultural issues, an historical context, the absence of
moral courage, and the political strife of this case are also discussed to provide a comprehensive
Part Two
White’s wife served as a secretary for Thornsbury at the time in which she and the judge
were engaged in an extramarital affair. In efforts to persuade his secretary to leave her husband,
Thornsbury insisted that White was involved in unlawful drug activities. When his secretary
terminated her relationship with Thornsbury, the judge chose to abuse the power vested in him
by conspiring with the West Virginia State Police to frame White by planting illegal substances
on White’s truck, in addition to arresting White for committing the crime of theft, a crime for
which White was innocent. Thornsbury also abused his authority by coercing a state grand jury
for the purpose of oppressing White and his family members. Following a physical assault of
White, Thornsbury arranged for White to receive a significantly harsher sentence than that of the
Moreover, in conspiring with Mingo County Commissioner David Baisden and Michael
Sparks, who served as the Mingo County Prosecutor, Thornsbury arranged to protect his
comrade, Sheriff Eugene Crum, from a federal investigation related to campaign law and drug
violations (Watson, 2015). Sheriff Crum owed White thousands of dollars for making election
campaign signs; therefore, Thornsbury schemed to have a police informant buy drugs from
White in order to have White charged and arrested. “White said Thornsbury promised that he
would only spend one month in jail and be placed on home confinement if he agreed to hire the
attorney the conspirators wanted” (Watson, 2015, n.p.). As such, White was coerced to fire his
defense attorney, after which point he received a 15-year prison sentence of which he served
eight months. The former judge did plead guilty to the charges against him and was sentenced to
serve 50 months in federal prison with an accompanying fine of $6,000 on June 9, 2014.
The ethical issues involved in this case are centered on violations of Canons one, two,
three and four that clearly stipulate the expectations to which judges are held on a professional
and ethical level. Canon one states that judges are commissioned to uphold and observe high
standards of conduct and integrity. Canon two indicates that, in all activities, judges must avoid
impropriety and earn the confidence of the public by means of impartiality. Moreover, Canon
two also reveals that judges are prohibited from allowing relationships of any sort from affecting
their judgment or conduct. Canon three is focused on remaining loyal to the law in the absence
of prejudice or bias by exercising diligence and impartiality. Canon three also prohibits ex parte
communication. Canon four mandates that judges must act in a professional capacity at all times
to reduce the potential of conflict regarding obligations, and this cannon stipulates that judges
must never demean their office. Judge Thornsbury was found to have violated every canon.
ETHICS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 4
Part Three
perform judiciary duties within the confines of established laws while respecting and preserving
the integrity of the canons to which individuals holding judiciary authority are held and
measured. The culture of this particular profession carries steep expectations to which judges are
compelled to adhere at all times. “Although judges are subject to the same human frailty as all
other members of society, they must expect their conduct to be the subject of constant public
scrutiny” (Bell, 2009, p. 619). It is crucial to note that judicial misconduct in the United States
far exceeds the quantity of judicial disciplinary proceedings. As such, it is entirely plausible to
contend that judges may gain a false sense of existing in a state that is above the law.
From an historical context, it is compelling to note that the sentencing judge, Judge
Thomas E. Johnston, drew a clear parallel between the actions of Thornsbury and those of a
level of corruption in a system that is intended to prevent the United States from embodying that
sort of country. “Some studies have tracked the historical development of judicial integrity
institutions and others have catalogued cases of judicial corruption” (Pahis, 2009, p. 1903). In
examining the history of judicial bribery from 1967 through 2000, 38 judges at the federal and
state levels were removed from office or convicted for bribery charges. Moreover, researchers
have found that more than one million dollars related to bribery are paid into the judicial system
per year.
There was no evidence of moral courage related to this criminal injustice. Thornsbury
was compelled to plead guilty as a product of insurmountable evidence coupled with the
information provided by his victim, White. It is quite probable that the political climate
ETHICS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 5
characteristic this particular situation, wherein a judge was reduced to the status of a defendant,
caused a great deal of speculation and concern regarding his conviction. Judge Johnston
convicted Thornsbury when a plea of ‘guilty’ was entered, thereby allowing Johnston to convict
a fellow judge while admonishing his actions. Justice was served; however, issues of criminal
References
doi:10.1080/03050710903387758
Pahis, S. (2009). Corruption in our courts : What it looks like and where it is hidden. Yale
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. (2013, August 15). Report of judicial disciplinary
releases/thornsbury-report.pdf
Watson, J. (2015, September 25). Former West Virginia judge pleads guilty, sentenced.
virginia-judge-pleads-guilty-sentenced/