Sie sind auf Seite 1von 49

Final Drainage Study

Foothills
Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

Prepared for:

City of Loveland

410 E. Fifth Street


Loveland, CO 80537

December 12, 2015

1501 Academy Ct. Ste. 203 Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 (970) 530-4044
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

December 12, 2015

Mr. Kevin Gingery, P.E.


City of Loveland Public Works - Stormwater Department
2525 West 1st Street
Loveland, CO 80537

RE: Foothills Solar and Substation


Loveland, Colorado
Project Number: U15009

Dear Kevin:

United Civil Design Group, LLC. is pleased to submit this Final Drainage Report for the Foothills
Solar and Substation site in Loveland, Colorado. In general, this report serves to document the
stormwater impacts associated with the proposed Foothills Solar and Substation.

We understand that review by the City of Loveland is to assure general compliance with
standardized criteria contained in the Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction
Standards. This report was prepared in compliance with technical criteria set forth in both the
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual and
the City of Loveland Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards manual.

If you should have any questions or comments as you review this report, please feel free to
contact us at your convenience.

Sincerely,

Sam Eliason, PE, LEED AP


Principal Engineer
United Civil Design Group, LLC

i U15009_DrainageReport.doc
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
I. General Location and Description ........................................................................................... 1
A. Location............................................................................................................................ 1
B. Description of Property ................................................................................................... 1
C. Description of Development............................................................................................ 2
II. Drainage Basins and Sub-Basins .............................................................................................. 2
A. Major Basin Description .................................................................................................. 2
B. Sub-Basin Description ...................................................................................................... 2
III. Drainage Design Criteria ......................................................................................................... 3
A. Regulations ...................................................................................................................... 3
B. Development Criteria Reference and Constraints .......................................................... 3
C. Hydrological Criteria ........................................................................................................ 3
D. Hydraulic Criteria ............................................................................................................. 4
IV. Drainage Facility Design .......................................................................................................... 4
A. General Concept .............................................................................................................. 4
B. Specific Details ................................................................................................................. 5
V. Sediment/Erosion Control ....................................................................................................... 7
VI. Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 8
A. Compliance with Standards ............................................................................................. 8
B. Drainage Concept ............................................................................................................ 8
C. Stormwater Quality ......................................................................................................... 8
VII. References ........................................................................................................................... 9

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - Hydrology Computations
APPENDIX B - Water Quality Calculations
APPENDIX C - Hydraulic Computations
C.1 – Storm Pipe Calculations
C.2 – Inlet Sizing Calculations
C.3 – Pond Weir and Orifice Rating Calculations
APPENDIX D - Drainage Exhibit

ii U15009_DrainageReport.doc
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

I. General Location and Description


A. Location

The Foothills Solar and Substation site (referred herein as ”the site”) is located in
portions Tracts B, C and D of the Vanguard-Famleco Second Addition to the City
of Loveland in the Northeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 5 North, Range 69
West of the 6th Principal Meridian to the City of Loveland, Larimer County,
Colorado. The site is bounded by West 29th Street on the north, West 22nd
Street on the south, MeHaffey Park on the east, and undeveloped land to the
west.

On the west side of the site is a drainageway that will be unaffected by the
development of this site. Within the development limits of the development on
the east side of the site there are no major drainageways, facilities, or
easements.

B. Description of Property

The site has a platted area of 52.6 acres of mostly undeveloped land.

The following is a summary of the existing conditions:


Ground Cover - The site currently exists as mostly undeveloped land and is
currently covered with grasses and weeds.
Grades - The western side of the site has steeper slopes that fall to the west
to a natural drainage that drains from north to south on the west side of the
property. In general, The east side of the site slopes towards the southeast
corner of the site with grades between 0 and 5 percent.
Soil Type - According to the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site consists of Fort
Collins loam, and Kim Loam (Hydrologic Soil Group B).
Utilities – The site includes multiple service lines in conjunction with a water
tank that is immediately north of the site. A water main and associated
services exist along a gravel road that is the future alignment for a Rio Blanco
Avenue. Existing utility mains and services including water, sanitary sewer,
natural gas, electric, telephone and data lines are located within West 22nd
Street.
Storm Drainage Facilities – The site has an existing drainage swale along the
west side of the gravel road that will ultimately be Rio Blanco Avenue. This
drainage swale conveys stormwater to a culvert underneath the gravel road.
The culvert conveys stormwater to an existing retention pond located to at
the southeast corner of the property.

1 U15009_DrainageReport.doc
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

C. Description of Development

The planned development for the site on this property will consist of the
following improvements:
 The construction of an 19 acre Solar Field.
 The construction of a 2.4 acre Substation.
 The construction of a public major collector road (Rio Blanco Drive).
 The construction of gravel drives in support of access to the Solar Field
and Substation.
 The construction of landscaped areas and berms.
 The construction of storm drains culverts and drainage swales to support
the proposed site in regards to storm runoff.
 The construction of a water quality pond located in the southeast
portion of the site.
 The westerly 17 acres of the site will remain undeveloped and continue
to drain to the west unaffected by the proposed improvements.

II. Drainage Basins and Sub-Basins


A. Major Basin Description

The site is split by the Rist Benson and Hogback basins of the City of Loveland
Master Drainage Plan. Prior to development, 28.5 acres located on the west
side of the property drains to Hogback basin and the remaining 24.1 acres on
the east side of the site drains to the Rist Benson basin.

B. Sub-Basin Description

The proposed project will re-direct some of the historic flows from Hogback
basin to Rist Benson basin. After development, the western 18.7 acres will drain
to the Hogback basin and the remaining 33.9 acres will drain to Rist Benson
basin. All of the proposed development will be in the Rist Benson basin and can
be safely directed to a proposed water quality pond at the southeast corner of
the site. A storm sewer stub was provided at the southeast corner of the site to
convey the 100-year storm event to a regional detention pond located on the
Mehaffey Park property south of the site.

The project site receives off-site runoff from the property to the northwest and
will continue to receive these off-site flows with the proposed development.
The onsite stormwater infrastructure and water quality pond have been
designed to account for these offsite flows.

2 U15009_DrainageReport.doc
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

III. Drainage Design Criteria


A. Regulations

The design criteria for this study are taken directly from the City of Loveland
Storm Drainage Criteria and City of Loveland Storm Drainage Standards (referred
to herein as City Drainage Criteria and Standards) and the Urban Storm Drainage
Criteria Manuals Volumes 2, and 3 (referred to herein as USDCM).

B. Development Criteria Reference and Constraints

This site has been included in the Mehaffey Park Regional Detention Pond
Report completed by WH Pacific on July 15, 2013. In addition, the site was also
included in the Mehaffey Park Final Drainage Report completed by WH Pacific
on July 3, 2013.

Those reports sized downstream infrastructure and a regional detention pond


for this property based on assumptions for the future development of this
property. Those reports assumed 28 acres located on this property and offsite
land northwest of this property would be developed as a residential subdivision
with 45% imperviousness. Those reports assumed 82 cfs would runoff this site
in the 100 year storm event. The Mehaffey Park project provided a 48” RCP
storm sewer at the property boundary to convey those flows. This project
proposes 40.2 acres at 21% imperviousness, which results in a 100 year runoff of
97.28 cf. The downstream 48” storm sewer has been analyzed with this report
and is shown to be adequate to convey these increased flows. It is understood
that the drainage infrastructure and regional detention pond are also adequate
to convey/detain the increased flows.

C. Hydrological Criteria

In accordance with the City of Loveland policy, a minor and major storm for the
Loveland area is identified as the 2-year and 100-year storms, respectively. A
major storm for the Loveland area has a recurrence interval of 100 years has a
peak intensity of 9.40 in/hr.

These storms have been used as a basis for planning and system. The peak flow
rates for design points have been calculated based on the Rational Method as
described in the USDCM with storm duration set equal to the time of
concentration for each sub-basin. This method was used to analyze the
developed runoff from the 2-year (minor) and the 100-year (major) storm
events. The Rational Method is widely accepted for drainage design involving
small drainage areas (less than 160 acres) and short time of concentrations. The
Rational Method is ideal for storm sewer sizing and small detention pond sizing

3 U15009_DrainageReport.doc
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

(for tributary areas no larger than 90 to 160 acres). Runoff coefficients were
assumed based on impervious area and soil type and are given in the
Appendices.

D. Hydraulic Criteria

The developed site will convey runoff to the proposed pond via swales, concrete
pans, and pipes. The City Drainage Criteria and Standards and USDCM were
referenced for all hydraulic calculations. In addition, the following computer
programs were utilized:
 Hydraflow Storm Sewers Extension for AutoCAD Civil 3D
 Hydraflow Express Extension for AutoCAD Civil3D
 UD-Inlet by UDFCD

IV. Drainage Facility Design


A. General Concept

The project includes the construction of a 2.4 acre substation, 19 acre solar field,
Rio Blanco Avenue, gravel access roads, and significant landscape buffers. In
general, existing drainage patterns are being maintained with the proposed
project. The site will ultimately consist of ground covered by landscape,
pavement and gravel.

All referenced tables, charts, formulas, etc. are included in the Appendices. The
area, time of concentration, and runoff of each proposed sub-basin is
summarized in Appendix A. The project site was divided into five (5) developed
sub-basins as explained further below:

Basin A1
Basin A1 consists of a water quality pond designed to provide water quality
for runoff within the pond itself in addition to all other onsite basins (B1, C1,
D1-D5).

Basin B1
Basin B1 consists of the northern half of the proposed Rio Blanco Avenue in
addition to onsite and offsite land (i.e. a portion of West 22nd Street) at the
southern end of the site. The runoff is conveyed via curb and gutter and is
further discharged into storm sewer infrastructure by way of a curb inlet on
the east side of Rio Blanco Avenue.

Basin C1
Basin C1 consists of the western half of the proposed Rio Blanco Avenue in
addition to a portion at the southern end of the proposed solar field and

4 U15009_DrainageReport.doc
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

land adjacent to the south solar field boundary, west of Rio Blanco Avenue.
The runoff is conveyed via curb and gutter and is further discharged into
storm sewer infrastructure by way of a curb inlet on the west side of Rio
Blanco Avenue.

Basins D1-D5
Basin D consists of Basins D1-D5 which includes some offsite property that is
also owned by Loveland Water & Power. The drainage is designed to be
collected via a series of swales and storm drain culverts that will discharge to
the proposed water quality pond at the southeast corner of the property.
Basin D will contain the majority of the proposed improvements and will
consist of mostly grass in addition to some gravel (e.g. gravel drives and
substation) and concrete (e.g. substation and existing water tank area).

Basin OS1
Basin OS1 consists of a small, 0.06 acre portion of Rio Blanco Avenue
adjacent to the northern boundary of the site. The runoff will follow the
natural, easterly draining pattern. When Rio Blanco Avenue is extended to
the north this small amount of runoff will be conveyed in the street to the
north.

B. Specific Details

Swales
All proposed drainage swales on the site are grass-lined drainage swales and
were designed based on the 100-yr event per City of Loveland rainfall
intensities. Appendix C provides a visual and numerical representation of
various cross sections processed in Hydraflow Express Extension for AutoCAD
Civil3D. All drainage swales were designed in accordance with the City of
Loveland Storm Drainage Criteria (Addendum to the Urban Storm Drainage
Criteria Manuals Volumes 1, 2 and 3).

Stormwater Quality
Water quality on the site will be provided through large grass buffers, open
areas, and several grass lined swales. Ultimately, water quality will be
provided via a water quality pond. The following is a table depicting the
required design volume for the proposed water quality pond given on and
offsite parameters affecting drainage:

5 U15009_DrainageReport.doc
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

Required Onsite Water Quality Capture Volume


Area Area
(acres) (acres) Watershed WQCV* (cf)
Basin %I
(Extended
(sf) (acres) (inches) Detention)
A1 24,296 0.558 3% 0.02 58
B1 148,835 3.417 62% 0.24 3,606
C1 301,695 6.926 29% 0.15 4,458
D1 812,562 18.654 2% 0.02 1,403
D2 106,240 2.439 35% 0.16 1,751
D3 63,757 1.464 22% 0.12 787
D4 101,326 2.326 46% 0.20 1,987
D5 192,663 4.423 41% 0.18 3,513
OS1 2,653 0.061 83% 0.35 92
Total 17,655
* based on 40 hr storage and additional 20% for extended detention

Storm Sewers
Storm sewer and culvert designs throughout the site were developed based
on the 100 yr event per the City of Loveland rainfall intensities. Appendix C
provides a visual and numerical representation of all proposed storm sewer
designs.

Inlets
All inlets for the project were sized using the following clogging factors:

% CAPACITY
CONDITION INLET TYPE ALLOWED
Sump or CDOT Type R
Continuous 5’ length 88
Grade 10’ length 92
15’ length 95
Sump Grated Type C 50
Type D 50

6 U15009_DrainageReport.doc
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

Drainage Summaries
The following is a basin summary table:

Design Area Q2 Q100


Basin %I C2 C100
Point (acre) (cfs) (cfs)
Onsite Basins
A1 A1 0.6 3% 0.063 0.511 0.09 1.99
B1 B1 3.4 62% 0.374 0.569 2.36 9.69
C1 C1 6.9 29% 0.164 0.464 2.10 16.02
D1 D1 18.7 2% 0.028 0.362 1.03 36.49
D2 D2 2.4 35% 0.198 0.480 1.14 7.35
D3 D3 1.5 22% 0.121 0.444 0.44 4.31
D4 D4 2.3 46% 0.269 0.512 1.51 7.68
D5 D5 4.4 41% 0.233 0.495 2.42 13.75
Onsite
40.2 21% 0.181 0.480 11.10 97.28
Total

Offsite Basins
OS1 OS1 0.1 83% 0.592 0.720 0.13 0.41

V. Sediment/Erosion Control
A separate Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) will be prepared for the site in
accordance with the Stormwater Discharge Permit for Colorado Department of Public
Health and Environment. The SWMP will include more detailed information on the
sediment and erosion control items for this project. At a minimum, the following
temporary BMP’s will be installed and maintained to control on-site erosion and
prevent sediment from traveling off-site during construction:

 Silt Fence – a woven synthetic fabric that filters runoff. The silt fence is a
temporary barrier that is placed at the base of a disturbed area.
 Vehicle Tracking Control – a stabilized stone pad located at points of ingress and
egress on a construction site. The stone pad is designed to reduce the amount of
mud transported onto public roads by construction traffic.
 Riprap – Riprap will be used downstream of all storm sewer outfalls to control
erosion of the receiving channels.
 Inlet Protection – acts as a sediment filter. It is a temporary BMP and requires
proper installation and maintenance to ensure their performance.
 Straw Wattles – wattles act as a sediment filter in swales around inlets. They are
a temporary BMP and require proper installation and maintenance to ensure
their performance.

7 U15009_DrainageReport.doc
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

 Slope Protection – Slopes should be terraced using a “tracked” vehicle, run


perpendicular to slope to inhibit rill/gulley erosion.

The contractor shall store all construction materials and equipment and shall
provide maintenance and fueling of equipment in confined areas on-site from which
runoff will be contained and filtered. The temporary Best Management Practices
(BMP’s) will be inspected by the contractor at a minimum of once every two weeks
and after each significant storm event.

VI. Conclusions
A. Compliance with Standards

Storm drainage calculations have typically followed the guidelines provided by


the City of Loveland Storm Drainage Criteria and City of Loveland Storm Drainage
Standards and/or the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manuals Volumes 2, and 3.

B. Drainage Concept

The drainage system has been designed to convey the runoff to the designated
design points and the existing off-site pond in an effective manner as safe as
possible. The runoff area for Rist Basin was increased by approximately 10 acres
over what was previously planned. However, with the reduced imperviousness
of the site and the recent construction of the regional detention pond south of
the site no negative impacts are anticipated to the City of Loveland Master
Drainage Plan due to the proposed improvements.

C. Stormwater Quality

Water quality will be provided through large grass buffers, open areas, and
several grass lined swales. Ultimately, water quality will be provided within the
water quality pond at the southeast corner of the site.

8 U15009_DrainageReport.doc
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

VII. References
1. City of Loveland Storm Drainage Standards, City of Loveland, Short Elliot
Hendrickson Inc., Loveland, Colorado, October 2004, Revised May 2009.

2. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District,
Wright Water Engineers, Inc., Denver, Colorado, June 2001.

3. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey at


websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app

4. City of Loveland Storm Drainage Criteria (Addendum to the UD&FCD Manuals 1, 2


and 3 and all amendments thereto).

5. Mehaffey Park Final Drainage Report, WH Pacific, Lakewood, CO, July 3, 2013

6. Mehaffey Park Regional Detention Pond Final Design Summary Report, WH Pacific,
Lakewood, CO, July 15, 2015.

9 U15009_DrainageReport.doc
Final Drainage Study
Foothills Solar & Substation
Loveland, CO

Certification

I hereby certify that this report for the final drainage design of the Foothills Solar and
Substation site was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) in accordance with the
provisions of the City of Loveland Storm Drainage Criteria for the owners thereof.

Registered Professional Engineer


State of Colorado No. 38212

10 U15009_DrainageReport.doc
APPENDIX A

Hydrology Calculations
Foothills Solar and Substation Runoff Summary
Loveland, Colorado

Area Q2 Q100
Basin Design Point %I C2 C100
(acre) (cfs) (cfs)
Onsite Basins
A1 A1 0.6 3% 0.063 0.511 0.09 1.99
B1 B1 3.4 62% 0.374 0.569 2.36 9.69
C1 C1 6.9 29% 0.164 0.464 2.10 16.02
D1 D1 18.7 2% 0.028 0.362 1.03 36.49
D2 D2 2.4 35% 0.198 0.480 1.14 7.35
D3 D3 1.5 22% 0.121 0.444 0.44 4.31
D4 D4 2.3 46% 0.269 0.512 1.51 7.68
D5 D5 4.4 41% 0.233 0.495 2.42 13.75
Onsite Total 40.2 21% 0.181 0.480 11.10 97.28

Offsite Basins
OS1 OS1 0.1 83% 0.592 0.720 0.13 0.41

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 12/13/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U15009_Hydrology.xlsx
Foothills Solar and Substation
Loveland, Colorado Runoff Coefficients and % Impervious

Areas
45%
Asphalt Walks(1) Gravel(1) Lawns(1) Composite Composite Runoff
Impervious NRCS Soil
Basin Design Pt. Total Total
%I = 45% %I = 100% %I = 90% %I =40% %I=2% Imperviousness Coefficients (2)
Type
(%I)

acres sf sf sf sf sf sf C2 C100
Onsite Basins
A1 A1 0.56 24296 340 23956 3.2% C/D 0.063 0.511
B1 B1 3.42 148835 69049 22829 3192 53765 61.8% B 0.374 0.569
C1 C1 6.93 301695 59679 23374 4952 213690 28.8% B 0.164 0.464
D1 D1 18.65 812562 6258 806304 2.3% B 0.028 0.362
D2 D2 2.44 106240 5837 77376 23027 34.5% B 0.198 0.480
D3 D3 1.46 63757 5819 19981 37957 21.9% B 0.121 0.444
D4 D4 2.33 101326 98652 2674 0 46.2% B 0.269 0.512
D5 D5 4.42 192663 174537 18126 41.0% B 0.233 0.495
Onsite Total 40.21 1751374 273189 128728 60873 111759 1176825 21.4%
Offsite Basins
OS1 OS1 0.06 2653 1626 622 405 82.7% B 0.592 0.720

Notes:
(1) Recommended % Imperviousness Values from USDCM Vol 1 - Ch 5 - Table RO-3. Increased Lawns from 0% to 2% Impervious.
(2) Runoff C is based on %I, UDFCD Eq RO-7 and correction factors in Table RO-4.
(3) Impervious area assumed to be 2500 s.f. of roof and 500 s.f. of driveway per single family and twin home lot.

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 12/11/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U15009_Hydrology.xlsx
Foothills Solar and Substation
Loveland, Colorado Time of Concentration

Initial Overland Flow Time (ti) Travel/Channelized Time of Flow (tt) tc Check for Urbanized
Initial ti+tt Total Final tc(6)
Basin Design Pt. Area Length Slope ti(2) Length Slope Velocity (3) tt(4) Check tc? tc(5)
Ground C5(1) Cv Length
acres Type ft % min ft % fps min min Urban? ft min min
Onsite Basins
A1 A1 0.6 Lawn 0.09 70 9 7.4 174 1 5 0.5 5.8 13.2 Yes 244 11 11
B1 B1 3.4 Paved 0.90 15 6 0.8 2470 2 5 0.7 58.2 59.0 Yes 2485 24 24
C1 C1 6.9 Paved 0.90 15 6 0.8 2476 2 5 0.7 58.4 59.1 Yes 2491 24 24
D1 D1 18.7 Lawn 0.09 391 2.4 26.9 1391 2 5 0.7 32.8 59.7 Yes 1782 20 20
D2 D2 2.4 Lawn 0.09 31 15 4.1 780 1.5 5 0.6 21.2 25.4 Yes 811 15 15
D3 D3 1.5 Walk 0.73 245 3.6 6.8 207 1.3 5 0.6 6.1 12.9 Yes 452 13 13
D4 D4 2.3 0.45 606 4.2 17.9 188 4.2 5 1.0 3.1 21.0 Yes 794 14 14
D5 D5 4.4 0.45 525 3.9 17.1 416 1.9 5 0.7 10.1 27.2 Yes 941 15 15
Offsite Basins
OS1 OS1 0.1 Walk 0.73 15 6.0 1.4 35 0.5 5 0.4 1.6 3.1 Yes 50 10 5

Notes:
(1) (4)
C5 based initial ground type and Table RO-5 tt=L/(V*60 sec/min)
(2) 1/2 1/3 (5)
ti = [1.8(1.1-C5)L ]/S , S= slope in %, L=length of overland flow (400' max) tc check (for urban or developed areas only) = total length/180 + 10
(3)
V=CvS0.5, S=watercourse slope in ft/ft, UDFCD Equation RO-4 (6)
min tc = 5 min

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 12/11/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U15009_Hydrology.xlsx
Foothills Solar and Substation
Loveland, Colorado Rational Method Peak Runoff

Final Runoff Coefficients Rainfall Intensity Peak Discharge


Area
Basin Design Pt.
tc(6) I2 I100 Q2 Q100
C2 C100
acre min in/hr in/hr cfs cfs
Onsite Basins
A1 A1 0.6 11 0.063 0.511 2.63 6.98 0.09 1.99
B1 B1 3.4 24 0.374 0.569 1.85 4.98 2.36 9.69
C1 C1 6.9 24 0.164 0.464 1.85 4.98 2.10 16.02
D1 D1 18.7 20 0.028 0.362 2.00 5.40 1.03 36.49
D2 D2 2.4 15 0.198 0.480 2.35 6.28 1.14 7.35
D3 D3 1.5 13 0.121 0.444 2.49 6.63 0.44 4.31
D4 D4 2.3 14 0.269 0.512 2.42 6.45 1.51 7.68
D5 D5 4.4 15 0.233 0.495 2.35 6.28 2.42 13.75
Offsite Basins
OS1 OS1 0.1 5 0.592 0.720 3.50 9.40 0.13 0.41

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 12/11/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U15009_Hydrology.xlsx
APPENDIX B

Water Quality Calculations


Foothills Solar and Substation Water Quality Capture Volume
Loveland, Colorado

Required Onsite Water Quality Capture Volume


Area (acres) Area Watershed WQCV* (cf)
Basin %I
(sf) (acres) (inches) (Extended Detention)
A1 24,296 0.558 3% 0.02 58
B1 148,835 3.417 62% 0.24 3,606
C1 301,695 6.926 29% 0.15 4,458
D1 812,562 18.654 2% 0.02 1,403
D2 106,240 2.439 35% 0.16 1,751
D3 63,757 1.464 22% 0.12 787
D4 101,326 2.326 46% 0.20 1,987
D5 192,663 4.423 41% 0.18 3,513
OS1 2,653 0.061 83% 0.35 92
Total 17,655
* based on 40 hr storage and additional 20% for extended detention

Designed Water Quality Plate Parameters


WQCV Space
Provided WQCV Area Required per Diamter of WQ
Basin No. of Columns between No. of Rows
(cf) Depth (ft) WQ Plate Row (in )
2 Hole (in)
rows (in.)
A1 17,801 4.18 0.387 11/16 1 4 13

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 12/11/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U15009_Hydrology.xlsx
APPENDIX C

Hydraulic Calculations
Note: Storm Line D1 consists of dual
36in RCP storm lines. The known flow
rates represented above show the
runoff conveyed per 36in storm line.
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Friday, Oct 9 2015

Culvert D2 - Major Event


Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 5147.34 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 62.00 Qmin (cfs) = 7.35
Slope (%) = 2.00 Qmax (cfs) = 7.35
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 5148.58 Tailwater Elev (ft) = Critical
Rise (in) = 18.0
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 18.0 Qtotal (cfs) = 7.35
No. Barrels = 1 Qpipe (cfs) = 7.35
n-Value = 0.013 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 8.17
Culvert Entrance = Groove end w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 5.57
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0018, 2, 0.0292, 0.74, 0.2 HGL Dn (ft) = 5148.10
HGL Up (ft) = 5149.63
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 5150.18
Top Elevation (ft) = 5152.13 Hw/D (ft) = 1.07
Top Width (ft) = 22.50 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 0.00
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Friday, Oct 9 2015

Culvert D3 - Major Event


Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 5145.94 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 70.00 Qmin (cfs) = 25.75
Slope (%) = 2.20 Qmax (cfs) = 25.75
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 5147.48 Tailwater Elev (ft) = Critical
Rise (in) = 24.0
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 24.0 Qtotal (cfs) = 25.75
No. Barrels = 1 Qpipe (cfs) = 25.75
n-Value = 0.013 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 11.23
Culvert Entrance = Groove end w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 8.72
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0018, 2, 0.0292, 0.74, 0.2 HGL Dn (ft) = 5147.31
HGL Up (ft) = 5149.26
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 5150.90
Top Elevation (ft) = 5151.38 Hw/D (ft) = 1.71
Top Width (ft) = 30.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 20.00
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Friday, Oct 9 2015

Culvert D4 - Major Event


Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 5154.87 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 62.05 Qmin (cfs) = 7.68
Slope (%) = 2.00 Qmax (cfs) = 7.68
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 5156.11 Tailwater Elev (ft) = Critical
Rise (in) = 18.0
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 18.0 Qtotal (cfs) = 7.68
No. Barrels = 1 Qpipe (cfs) = 7.68
n-Value = 0.013 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 8.28
Culvert Entrance = Groove end w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 5.68
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0018, 2, 0.0292, 0.74, 0.2 HGL Dn (ft) = 5155.65
HGL Up (ft) = 5157.18
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 5157.76
Top Elevation (ft) = 5159.57 Hw/D (ft) = 1.10
Top Width (ft) = 30.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 20.00
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Friday, Oct 9 2015

Culvert D5 - Major Event


Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 5151.15 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 70.00 Qmin (cfs) = 13.75
Slope (%) = 0.76 Qmax (cfs) = 13.75
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 5151.68 Tailwater Elev (ft) = Critical
Rise (in) = 24.0
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 24.0 Qtotal (cfs) = 13.75
No. Barrels = 1 Qpipe (cfs) = 13.75
n-Value = 0.013 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 6.77
Culvert Entrance = Groove end w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 6.18
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0018, 2, 0.0292, 0.74, 0.2 HGL Dn (ft) = 5152.38
HGL Up (ft) = 5153.01
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 5153.63
Top Elevation (ft) = 5155.87 Hw/D (ft) = 0.98
Top Width (ft) = 38.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 20.00
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Monday, Aug 3 2015

Swale D1 - Major Event

User-defined Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 5120.19 Depth (ft) = 1.19
Slope (%) = 2.00 Q (cfs) = 69.58
N-Value = 0.035 Area (sqft) = 13.74
Velocity (ft/s) = 5.06
Calculations Wetted Perim (ft) = 17.35
Compute by: Known Q Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 1.19
Known Q (cfs) = 69.58 Top Width (ft) = 17.10
EGL (ft) = 1.59
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 12.04, 5121.49)-(13.67, 5122.02, 0.035)-(18.01, 5122.37, 0.035)-(27.01, 5120.19, 0.035)-(33.01, 5120.19, 0.035)-(47.88, 5123.05, 0.035)

Note: Swale D1 analysis considered runoff over entire


Basin D1, a conservative assumption. 1ft of freeboard
is accounted for in a 100-yr event per City of Loveland
Storm Drainage Criteria (Addendum to Urban Storm
Draiange Criteria Manuals Volumes 1, 2 an 3.

Elev (ft) Depth (ft)


Section
5124.00 3.81

5123.00 2.81

5122.00 1.81

5121.00 0.81

5120.00 -0.19

5119.00 -1.19
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

Sta (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Friday, Jul 31 2015

Swale D2 - Major Event

User-defined Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 5153.23 Depth (ft) = 0.99
Slope (%) = 0.90 Q (cfs) = 9.776
N-Value = 0.035 Area (sqft) = 3.95
Velocity (ft/s) = 2.47
Calculations Wetted Perim (ft) = 8.22
Compute by: Known Q Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.82
Known Q (cfs) = 9.78 Top Width (ft) = 7.98
EGL (ft) = 1.09
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 0.00, 5154.88) -(22.06, 5155.23, 0.035) -(30.06, 5153.23, 0.035) -(38.06, 5155.20, 0.035) -(57.22, 5155.49, 0.035)

Note: The Swale D2 analysis provides a flow rate


of 1.33 times the 100-yr design flow (7.35 CFS)
per City of Loveland Storm Drainage Criteria
(Addendum to Urban Storm Draiange Criteria
Manuals Volumes 1, 2 an 3.

Elev (ft) Section Depth (ft)


5156.00 2.77

5155.50 2.27

5155.00 1.77

5154.50 1.27

5154.00 0.77

5153.50 0.27

5153.00 -0.23

5152.50 -0.73
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Sta (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Friday, Oct 9 2015

Swale D3 - Major Event

User-defined Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 5149.16 Depth (ft) = 1.19
Slope (%) = 0.80 Q (cfs) = 33.10
N-Value = 0.035 Area (sqft) = 10.66
Velocity (ft/s) = 3.11
Calculations Wetted Perim (ft) = 14.18
Compute by: Known Q Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.94
Known Q (cfs) = 33.10 Top Width (ft) = 13.90
EGL (ft) = 1.34
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 7.16, 5153.25)-(13.17, 5152.17, 0.035)-(25.21, 5149.16, 0.035)-(29.22, 5149.16, 0.035)-(43.02, 5152.36, 0.035)-(48.92, 5152.47, 0.035)

Elev (ft) Depth (ft)


Section
5154.00 4.84

5153.00 3.84

5152.00 2.84

5151.00 1.84

5150.00 0.84

5149.00 -0.16

5148.00 -1.16
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

Sta (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Friday, Oct 9 2015

Swale D4 - Major Event

User-defined Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 5159.50 Depth (ft) = 0.91
Slope (%) = 1.10 Q (cfs) = 10.24
N-Value = 0.035 Area (sqft) = 4.04
Velocity (ft/s) = 2.54
Calculations Wetted Perim (ft) = 9.06
Compute by: Known Q Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.78
Known Q (cfs) = 10.24 Top Width (ft) = 8.87
EGL (ft) = 1.01
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 29.84, 5161.30)-(39.83, 5161.10, 0.035)-(48.89, 5159.50, 0.035)-(61.87, 5162.67, 0.035)

Note: The Swale D4 analysis provides


a flow rate of 1.33 times the 100-yr
design flow (7.68 CFS) per City of
Loveland Storm Drainage Criteria
(Addendum to Urban Storm Draiange
Criteria Manuals Volumes 1, 2 an 3.

Elev (ft) Depth (ft)


Section
5163.00 3.50

5162.00 2.50

5161.00 1.50

5160.00 0.50

5159.00 -0.50

5158.00 -1.50
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Sta (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Friday, Oct 9 2015

Swale D5 - Major Event

User-defined Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 5152.47 Depth (ft) = 0.61
Slope (%) = 2.10 Q (cfs) = 13.75
N-Value = 0.035 Area (sqft) = 4.00
Velocity (ft/s) = 3.44
Calculations Wetted Perim (ft) = 9.53
Compute by: Known Q Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.59
Known Q (cfs) = 13.75 Top Width (ft) = 9.40
EGL (ft) = 0.79
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 22.68, 5156.15)-(40.74, 5152.47, 0.035)-(44.47, 5152.47, 0.035)-(56.25, 5155.15, 0.035)-(62.15, 5155.28, 0.035)

Elev (ft) Depth (ft)


Section
5157.00 4.53

5156.00 3.53

5155.00 2.53

5154.00 1.53

5153.00 0.53

5152.00 -0.47

5151.00 -1.47
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Sta (ft)
Foothills Solar and Substation FROUDE ANALYSIS
Loveland, Colorado

SWALE SECTION: D1 -D1

VELOCITY = 5.06 FT/S


CROSS SECTIONAL AREA = 13.74 SF FROUDE NUMBER EQUATION
TOP WIDTH = 17.10 FT
HYDRAULIC DEPTH = 0.80 FT
FROUDE = 0.99
WHERE:
SWALE SECTION: D2 -D2 V = WATER VELOCITY
D = HYDRAULIC DEPTH
VELOCITY = 2.47 FT/S (CROSS SECTION AREA / TOP WIDTH)
CROSS SECTIONAL AREA = 3.95 SF G = GRAVITY (32.2 FT/S^2)
TOP WIDTH = 7.98 FT
HYDRAULIC DEPTH = 0.49 FT
FROUDE = 0.62
NOTE: PER CITY OF LOVELAND CRITERIA, ALL
SWALE SECTION: D3 -D3 DRAINAGE SWALES REPRESENTED BY A
FROUDE NUMBER OF 0.80 OR GREATER
VELOCITY = 3.11 FT/S REQUIRE PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL
CROSS SECTIONAL AREA = 10.66 SF
TOP WIDTH = 13.90 FT
HYDRAULIC DEPTH = 0.77 FT
FROUDE = 0.63

SWALE SECTION: D4 -D4

VELOCITY = 2.54 FT/S


CROSS SECTIONAL AREA = 4.04 SF
TOP WIDTH = 8.87 FT
HYDRAULIC DEPTH = 0.46 FT
FROUDE = 0.66

SWALE SECTION: D5 -D5

VELOCITY = 3.44 FT/S


CROSS SECTIONAL AREA = 4.00 SF
TOP WIDTH = 9.40 FT
HYDRAULIC DEPTH = 0.43 FT
FROUDE = 0.93

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 10/9/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\Swales\Froude Analysis.xlsx
Foothills Solar and Substation
Loveland, CO Area Inlet Capacity

INLET ID: D1-3

Governing Equations:
Inlet capacity equation at low flows (weir calculation): Q = 3 . 0 P H 1 .5
Where:
P = 2(L + W)
H = depth of water above the flowline

Inlet capacity equation at higher flows (orifice calculation): Q = 0 . 67 A ( 2 gH ) 0 . 5


Where:
A = open area of the inlet grate
H = depth of water above the centroid of the cross-sectional area (A)

Input Parameters:
Grate: Double Type D
Wier Perimeter: 34.34
Open Area of Grate (ft2): 15.37 Q2 = 6.55 cfs
Flowline Elevation (ft): 5118.66 Q100 = 69.58 cfs
Allowable Capacity: 50%

Depth vs. Flow:


Shallow Orifice Actual
Depth Above Inlet Elevation Weir Flow Flow Flow
(ft) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
0.00 5118.66 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.10 5118.76 1.63 13.06 1.63
0.20 5118.86 4.61 18.47 4.61 Note: A max depth above
0.30 5118.96 8.46 22.62 8.46 inlet of 2ft (conservative for
design) was considered for
0.40 5119.06 13.03 26.12 13.03
further street inlet
0.50 5119.16 18.21 29.20 18.21 calculations. An overflow of
0.60 5119.26 23.94 31.99 23.94 11.17 cfs was taken for
0.70 5119.36 30.17 34.55 30.17 further street inlet capacity
0.80 5119.46 36.86 36.94 36.86 calculations.
0.90 5119.56 43.98 39.18 39.18
1.00 5119.66 51.51 41.30 41.30
1.50 5120.16 94.63 50.58 50.58
2.00 5120.66 145.69 58.41 58.41 Q100
2.50 5121.16 203.61 65.30 65.30
3.00 5121.66 267.65 71.54 71.54
3.50 5122.16 337.28 77.27 77.27
4.00 5122.66 412.08 82.60 82.60

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 8/4/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\Inlets\Area Inlets.xlsx
Foothills Solar and Substation Street Inlet Capacity

Worksheet Protected
DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET
OR GRASS-LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD

Project: Foothills Solar and Substation


Inlet ID: Inlet D1-1, Inlet D1-2

Show Details

Design Flow: ONLY if already determined through other methods: Minor Storm Major Storm <---
(local peak flow for 1/2 of street OR grass-lined channel): *QKnown = 2.1 11.7 cfs FILL IN THIS SECTION
* If you enter values in Row 14, skip the rest of this sheet and proceed to sheet Q-Allow or Area Inlet. OR…
Geographic Information: (Enter data in the blue cells): FILL IN THE
Subcatchment Area = Acres SECTIONS BELOW.
Percent Imperviousness = % <---
NRCS Soil Type = A, B, C, or D
Site Type: Flows Developed For:

Site is Urban Street Inlets Slope (ft/ft) Length (ft)


Site is Non-Urban Area Inlets in a Median Overland Flow =
Channel Flow =

Rainfall Information: Intensity I (inch/hr) = C 1 * P1 / ( C2 + Tc ) ^ C3 Minor Storm Major Storm


Design Storm Return Period, T r = years
Return Period One-Hour Precipitation, P 1 = inches
C1 =
C2 =
C3 =
User-Defined Storm Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C =
User-Defined 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C 5 =
Bypass (Carry-Over) Flow from upstream Subcatchments, Q b = 0.0 0.0 cfs

Total Design Peak Flow, Q = 2.1 11.7 cfs

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 8/4/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\Inlets\UD-Inlet_v3.14.xlsm
Foothills Solar and Substation Street Inlet Capacity

ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)


(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)
Project: Foothills Solar and Substation
Inlet ID: Inlet D1-1, Inlet D1-2

Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)


Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 12.0 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.013

Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 6.00 inches


Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 22.0 ft
Gutter Width W= 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.083 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.000 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.013

Minor Storm Major Storm


Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 22.0 22.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 6.0 8.9 inches
Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes

MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = SUMP SUMP cfs
Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak'
Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak'

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 8/4/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\Inlets\UD-Inlet_v3.14.xlsm
Foothills Solar and Substation Street Inlet Capacity

INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATION

Project = Foothills Solar and Substation


Inlet ID = Inlet D1-1, Inlet D1-2

Lo (C)

H-Curb
H-Vert
Wo
WP
W

Lo (G)

Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR


Type of Inlet Inlet Type = CDOT Type R Curb Opening
Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from 'Q-Allow') alocal = 3.00 3.00 inches
Number of Unit Inlets (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 1
Water Depth at Flowline (outside of local depression) Ponding Depth = 6.0 8.9 inches
Override Depths
Grate Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Grate Lo (G) = N/A N/A feet
Width of a Unit Grate Wo = N/A N/A feet
Area Opening Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15-0.90) Aratio = N/A N/A
Clogging Factor for a Single Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) Cf (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.15 - 3.60) Cw (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.80) Co (G) = N/A N/A
Curb Opening Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Curb Opening Lo (C) = 10.00 10.00 feet
Height of Vertical Curb Opening in Inches Hvert = 6.00 6.00 inches
Height of Curb Orifice Throat in Inches Hthroat = 6.00 6.00 inches
Angle of Throat (see USDCM Figure ST-5) Theta = 63.40 63.40 degrees
Side Width for Depression Pan (typically the gutter width of 2 feet) Wp = 2.00 2.00 feet
Clogging Factor for a Single Curb Opening (typical value 0.10) Cf (C) = 0.10 0.10
Curb Opening Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.3-3.7) Cw (C) = 3.60 3.60
Curb Opening Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.70) Co (C) = 0.67 0.67
MINOR MAJOR
Total Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) Qa = 8.3 19.5 cfs
Inlet Capacity IS GOOD for Minor and Major Storms (>Q PEAK) Q PEAK REQUIRED = 2.1 11.7 cfs

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 8/4/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\Inlets\, UD-Inlet_v3.14.xlsm
Foothills Solar and Substation Weir Capacity
Loveland, CO

Outlet Structure ID: Pond Outlet

Governing Equation:
  q 
The trapezoidal weir is a broad-crested weir governed by the following equation: Q  C w  L  0 . 8 H tan    H b
* where Q = discharge (cfs)   2 
* where C w = weir coefficient
* where L = crest length (ft)
* where H = head on weir (ft)
* where b = 1.5

For 4:1 side slopes, q = 151.9276° so that tan (q/2) = 4

Input Parameters:
Top of Weir Elevation (ft) = 5116.60
Crest Elevation (ft) = 5119.10
Length of Weir (ft) = 13
Weir Coefficient = 2.60

Depth vs. Flow:

Depth Above Crest (ft) Elevation (ft) Outlet Structure Weir Discharge (cfs)
0.00 5116.60 0
0.10 5116.70 1
0.20 5116.80 3
0.30 5116.90 6
0.40 5117.00 9
0.50 5117.10 13
0.60 5117.20 18
0.70 5117.30 23
0.80 5117.40 29
0.90 5117.50 35
1.00 5117.60 42
1.10 5117.70 50
1.20 5117.80 58
1.30 5117.90 66
1.40 5118.00 75
1.50 5118.10 85
1.60 5118.20 95
1.62 5118.22 97 100-year flowrate
1.70 5118.30 106
1.80 5118.40 118
1.90 5118.50 130
2.00 5118.60 143
2.10 5118.70 156
2.20 5118.80 170
2.30 5118.90 185
2.40 5119.00 200

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 12/11/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\Pond Outlet.xls
Foothills Solar and Substation Riprap Sizing at Pipe Outlets
Loveland, CO

INPUT CALCULATE OUTPUT


Circular Rectangular Urban Drainage
Culvert Parameters Expansion 2*d50,
Pipe Pipe Froude pg MD-107 Riprap
Factor Depth
Circular Box Culvert (Figure MD-21) (Figure MD-22) Parameter Type Spec Spec
Yt, 1/(2tanq) of
Q/D2.5 Min. Length Min. Width
Design Tailwater L= Riprap
Pipe Designation D or Da, H or Ha, W, Max 6.0 (From of of
Discharge Depth (From At=Q/V 1/(2tanq)* (ft)
Pipe Culvert Culvert or Figure Riprap Riprap
(cfs) (ft) Yt/D Q/D1.5 Q/D2.5 Yt/H Q/WH0.5 Figure (ft) [At/Yt)-W]
Diameter Height Width Q/WH1.5 MD-21 or (ft) (ft)
MD-23 or (ft) for L/2
(ft) (ft) (ft) Max 8.0 MD-22)
MD-24)

Storm Line D1 Outlet 45.68 3.00 2.20 0.73 8.79 2.93 N/A N/A 6.70 2.93 9.14 7.72 Type L 10.00 5.00 1.5
Storm Line D2 Outlet 7.35 1.50 1.05 0.70 4.00 2.67 N/A N/A 6.70 2.67 1.47 -0.67 Type L 5.00 5.00 1.5
Storm Line D3 Outlet 25.74 2.00 1.78 0.89 9.10 4.55 N/A N/A 6.70 4.55 5.15 5.98 Type L 10.00 5.00 1.5
Storm Line D4 Outlet 7.68 1.50 1.07 0.71 4.18 2.79 N/A N/A 6.70 2.79 1.54 -0.43 Type L 5.00 5.00 1.5
Storm Line D5 Outlet 13.75 2.00 1.33 0.67 4.86 2.43 N/A N/A 6.70 2.43 2.75 0.45 Type L 5.00 5.00 1.5

* The Storm Line D1 (a dual storm line) analysis represents the rip rap design per 36in storm line.

Calculations by: CDB


Date: 8/6/2015 C:\United Civil\Dropbox\Projects\U15009 - Foothills Solar\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\Riprap\Riprap Calcs Spreadsheet.xls
APPENDIX D

Drainage Exhibit
LEGEND
LOT LINES

RIGHT OF WAY

CURB & GUTTER

BASIN DESIGNATION

2 - YR RUNOFF COEFF.
100 - YR RUNOFF COEFF.
Civil Engineering &
BASIN AREA (ACRE) Consulting

BASIN BOUNDARY

1501 Academy Ct.


DESIGN POINT Ste. 203
D-101
Fort Collins, CO 80524
(970) 530-4044
FLOW DIRECTION
www.unitedcivil.com

The engineer preparing these plans will not be responsible


for, or liable for, unauthorized changes to or uses of these
NOTES

plans. All changes to the plans must be in writing and


must be approved by the preparer of these plans.
1. EXISTING UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES AS SHOWN
ARE INDICATED ACCORDING TO THE BEST
INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE
ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO CALL ALL UTILITY
COMPANIES (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE) PRIOR
TO ANY CONSTRUCTION TO VERIFY EXACT
UTILITY LOCATIONS.

2. THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL BE


IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO SEVERAL
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH
ALL UTILITY PROVIDERS PRIOR TO AND
DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE
SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS TO
SURROUNDING BUILDINGS OR
PROPERTIES. CAUTION

12/11/2015
FOOTHILLS SOLAR PARK AND SUBSTATION

DATE SUBMITTED:
DRAINAGE PLAN

PREPARED FOR: LOVELAND WATER & POWER


0 50' 100' 200'

SCALE: 1" = 100'


PROPOSED
GROUND
DRAINAGE SUMMARY
EXISTING
EXISTING GROUND
GROUND
WSEL @ Q100 = 34.31 CFS AREA Q2 Q100
WSEL @ Q100 = 69.58 CFS DESIGN
BASIN %I C2 C100
POINT
(ACRE) (CFS) (CFS)
11.92" 24.12"
PROPOSED
GROUND ONSITE BASINS
4:1 4:1 14.28" 4:1 4:1 14.28"
MAX. MAX. MAX. MAX. EXISTING A1 A1 0.6 3% 0.063 0.511 0.09 1.99
GROUND
6' 4'
B1 B1 3.4 62% 0.374 0.569 2.36 9.69

LONGITUDINAL SLOPE = 2.0%


LONGITUDINAL SLOPE = 0.8% PROPOSED
GROUND WSEL @ Q100 = 13.75 CFS C1 C1 6.9 29% 0.164 0.464 2.10 16.02 POND SUMMARY
D1 D1 18.7 2% 0.028 0.362 1.03 36.49
REQUIRED 100-YEAR WATER QUALITY VOLUME 17,655 CF
SECTION D1-D1 SECTION D3-D3 24.96" D2 D2 2.4 35% 0.198 0.480 1.14 7.35 WATER QUALITY VOLUME PROVIDED 17,801 CF

4:1 7.32"
D3 D3 1.5 22% 0.121 0.444 0.44 4.31
OVERFLOW SPILLWAY ELEVATION 5016.60

E W
4:1
MAX. MAX.
TOP OF POND ELEVATION 5119.10
I
EV
D4 D4 2.3 46% 0.269 0.512 1.51 7.68
4' N
O
TI
R

S
D5 D5 4.4 41% 0.233 0.495 2.42 13.75 C
U

AN
AL
LONGITUDINAL SLOPE = 2.1%
EXISTING R
PROPOSED
GROUND ST
N

PL
GROUND ONSITE
N
FI
40.2 21% 0.181 0.480 11.10 97.28 O
PROPOSED TOTAL C
WSEL @ 1.33(Q100) =9.78 CFS
WSEL @ 1.33(Q100) = 10.24 CFS
GROUND R
FO
11.74"
4:1
MAX.
SECTION D5-D5 N
O
T

8.82" OFFSITE BASINS


4:1 4:1 11.88"
MAX. MAX. EXISTING
GROUND
4:1
MAX.
10.92"
OS1 OS1 0.1 83% 0.592 0.720 0.13 0.41 C502
11 25
LONGITUDINAL SLOPE = 0.9%
LONGITUDINAL SLOPE = 0.9%

N/A
100'

SECTION D2-D2 SECTION D4-D4


U15009

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen