Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com
Non-Reportable
Versus
WITH
Digitally signed by
SANJAY KUMAR
Criminal Appeal No.1204 of 2018
Date: 2018.09.20
16:05:10 IST
Reason:
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4502/2016)
1
LatestLaws.com
O R D E R
Leave granted.
‘FSS Act’) and Sections 188, 272, 273 and 328 of the Indian
Bombay for quashing the FIRs. The High Court quashed the
us.
2
LatestLaws.com
3
LatestLaws.com
for ofences under the IPC could have been preferred by the
the High Court. The High Court found that the notiication
4
LatestLaws.com
the FSS Act and no other action can be initiated against the
Respondents.
Section 188 of the IPC. Section 188 of the IPC does not
agree with the High Court that the prohibitory order of the
5
LatestLaws.com
the same time, an ofence under any other law. 2 The High
6
LatestLaws.com
We, therefore, set aside the inding of the High Court on the
irst point.
under Section 188, 272, 273 and 328 have been made out
7
LatestLaws.com
points that were not argued before the High Court were
under Section 188, 272, 273 and 328 of the IPC are made
out in the FIRs which are the subject matter of the cases.
8
LatestLaws.com
disposed of.
................................J
[ S.A. BOBDE ]
..................................J
[ L. NAGESWARA RAO ]
NEW DELHI;
SEPTEMBER 20, 2018.