Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Solar
Power?
Water, wind or sun?
Matthew Stein, author of When Technology Fails: A Manual for Self-
Reliance, Sustainability, and Surviving the Long Emergency wrestles with
that very question in his book.
Here’s an excerpt: No single RE source works best all the time in all
situations. Hybrid systems often yield the best year-round performance. Wind
and micro-hydro usually perform well during stormy periods, while
photovoltaics work best in dry summer conditions with long sunny days.
Photovoltaics have the benefit of no moving parts, no maintenance, high
reliability, and a long life averaging about 25 years or more for solar panels.
In 2008 solar panel cost of about $5 per watt (remember that batteries and
inverters will add significantly to this cost) has been steadily dropping as
sales of solar cells have doubled every few years.
The recent invention of solar roofing panels and the introduction of major PV
incentives in several countries are expected to continue to boost sales and
significantly reduce prices over the next decade.
Advantages
<="" ins="" data-adsbygoogle-status="done" style="box-sizing: border-box;
height: 280px; width: 336px; display: block;">
Hydropower:
Lowest cost per watt hour
Usually a predictable year round power output
Often does not require a large battery bank
System is quiet and often can be made unobtrusive
Typically low maintainance
Windpower:
Low cost per watt hour in a good location
Smaller systems can be low maintainance
Predictable power output in some locations
Solar power:
Can be used almost anywhere
Extermely low maintainance
Very long system lifespans
Can be operated unmonitored for extended periods of time
Predictable power output in most locations
Simple installation
Silent , unobtrusive operation
Disadvantages
Hydropower:
Not suitable in many locations due to lack of resource
Often requires substantial modification of water resource (except for in-
stream type generators)
Initial installation cost can be high if damming or dirtwork is required
In colder climates, freezing of pipes, etc can be a problem
Moving parts will eventually wear out
Windpower:
Not suitable in many locations due to lack of resource
Towering can be expensive for larger units, and may require heavy
equipment to erect.
Some people object to the tower aesthetically
Birds of prey run into tower and guy wires (similar to but smaller than
utility installations in this respect)
Power output can be sporadic in some areas, nescesitates the use of a
large battery bank and / or altrenate power source
Many people report that considerable noise is generated in high winds
Even routine, minor maintainance on a windmill can be difficult on the
top of a tower. Systems to reduce / eliminate this problem typically add
to the cost and complexity of the system.
Moving parts will eventually wear out
Solar power:
High initial cost for solar panels
Power output can be variable in some areas, nescesitates the use of a
large battery bank and / or altrenate power source
Requires good solar exposure (not practical in shaded areas, etc.)
The major problem with ANY power source is the “Opposition special interest
groups”. Lets see now of course we all know about the evils of the nukes,
windmills have been know to cut birds in half and the “It destroys my view”
people. “Solar panels are ugly” people. Hydro hurts the fish. I suspect that if
we all used a generator with a hand crank someone would find a problem
with that.
Bottom line is that no matter what we do, there WILL be a side affect
somewhere, people need to deal with it!!
Greg,
Hybrid systems using two or more of these power sources, or using a fuel
powered generator as a supplement usually provide superior performance
over a wide range of conditions.