Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
4. Any person who in any meeting, association, Art. 154. Unlawful use of means of publication
or public place, shall display placards or and unlawful utterances
emblems which provoke a disturbance of the
public order Unlawful use of means of publication and
unlawful utterances may be committed by:
5. Those persons who in violation of the
provisions contained in the last clause of 1. Any person who by means of printing,
Article 85 (In no case shall the burial of the lithography, or any other means of
body of a person sentenced to death be held publication shall publish or cause to
with pomp) published as news any false news which may
endanger the public order, or cause damage
to the interest or credit of the State;
Qualified Disturbance or Interruption
The disturbance of public order or the 2. Any person who by the same means, or by
interruption of public performances, functions, words, utterances, or speeches, shall:
gatherings or meetings is qualified when its a. encourage disobedience to the law or to
tumultuous in character the constituted authorities or
b. praise, justify or extol any act punished
by law;
Tumultuous Character
Disturbance or interruption is deemed 3. Any person who shall maliciously publish or
tumultuous when caused by more than three cause to be published any official resolution
persons who are armed and provided with or document without proper authority, or
means of violence before they have been published officially;
4. Any person who shall print, publish, or
distribute or cause to be printed, published,
When does making an outcry to Incite Rebellion or distributed books, pamphlets, periodicals,
or Sedition amount to Inciting Rebellion or or leaflets which do not bear the printer’s
Sedition name, or which are classified as anonymous
When it is made with the idea or afterthought of
inducing the listeners or readers to commit the NOTE: the false news need not actually cause
crime of rebellion or sedition public disorder or damage to the State
When committed
Committed only by a convict who, having been Cases:
granted conditional pardon by the Chief 1. Sales vs. Director of Prisons
Executive, shall violate any of the conditions of 2. Culanag vs. Director of Prisons
such pardon
Art. 160. Commission of another crime during Reiteracion
service of penalty imposed for another offense; That the offender has been previously punished
Penalty by an offense to which the law attaches an equal
or greater penalty or for two or more crimes to
Quasi-recidivism which it attaches a lighter penalty.
A special aggravating circumstance where a
person, after having been convicted by final Reason for increase in liability
judgment, before beginning to serve such Perversity and incorrigibility
sentence, or while serving the same shall commit
a new felony.
Things to remember about Quasi-recidivism
Kinds of aggravating circumstances: 1. The previous crime for which the accused is
1. Generic – that which generally applies to all serving sentence may be a felony or a
crimes like recidivism. violation of a special law
2. Specific – that which applies to a particular 2. Quasi-recidivism must be alleged In the
felony like cruelty in crimes against persons. information
3. Qualifying – that which changes the nature 3. A quasi-recidivist may be pardoned after the
of the felony, as treachery in murder. age of 70
4. Inherent – that which is part of the felony
committed, as unlawful entry in robbery
with force upon things. Cases:
5. Special – that which arise under special 1. People vs. TIongson
conditions to increase the penalty of the 2. People vs. Baldogo
offense to its maximum period, but cannot
increase the penalty to the next higher Art. 161. Counterfeiting the great seal of the
degree Government of the Philippine Islands, forging
the signature or stamp of the Chief Executive
NOTE: a Special aggravating circumstance “Forgery”
cannot be offset by an ordinary mitigating The making of a false document knowing it
circumstance nor lowered by one degree to be false with intent that it should be used
although there are two or more of the latter or acted on as genuine to the prejudice of
another.
Art. 62 par. 5
a person is a habitual delinquent, if within a Subject Matter for Forgery
period of ten years from the date of his release 1. Great seal of the government of the
or last conviction of the crimes of serious or less Philippine Islands, which is in the custody of
serious physical injuries, robo, hurto, estafa or the President
falsification, he is found guilty of any of said 2. The signature of the Chief Executive
crimes a third time or oftener. 3. The stamp of the Chief Executive
“Utter” Cases:
Means to fabricate and put into circulation false People vs. Tin Ching
coins
Elements:
1. the offender makes in a document Case:
statements in a narration of facts Managangey vs. Sandiganbayan
E. Altering true dates 2. Committing any falsification enumerated in
171 in any private document to or with
NOTE: the date altered must be essential. It intent to damage a third party
must affect either the veracity of the document 3. Knowingly introducing in evidence in any
or the effects thereof. judicial proceeding any of the false
documents embraced in Art. 171 or Art. 172
F. Making any alteration or intercalation in a 4. Using any of the false documents embraced
genuine document which changes its in Art. 171 and 172to the damage of another
meaning or with intent to cause such damage
Ways to commit
1. Uttering a fictitious wireless, telegraph or
telephone message
2. Falsifying a wireless, telegraph, or telephone
message