Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.12821
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Practical applications
Some information about physical properties of foods usually are not available, therefore, a sim-
ple method to estimate the thermal diffusivity could be useful, once it influences the quality
control of foods. Thus, the findings of this study may facilitate the food industry, assisting the
design, and simulation of process, such as heating, cooling, freezing, defrosting, frying, and
storage.
reduce the time necessary for heat supplied by lamp was conducted
to thermocouple location and modified the temperature. The position
of thermocouple influences if the location is already at infinite region,
because in this region there would be no temperature variation. Loca-
tions very close to surface would stabilize very fast, then an interme-
diary position is acceptable.
With respect to frequency of temperature data collection, it was
chosen 1 s. This choice does not directly influence estimation thermal
diffusivity values, as the mathematical modeling proposed by Equa-
tion (2) requires the total experiment time after stabilization of surface
temperature. However, the frequency used facilitated the identifica-
tion of condition of surface stabilization, once it is more representa-
tive to follow temperature variation and to visualize the stabilization
using small intervals of data collection.
It was not considered doing an error analysis, because the objec-
FIGURE 3 Solid dimensions
tive of this work was to introduce a simple method to estimate ther-
mal diffusivity. To evaluate the boundary conditions, first, it was selected the
type of simulation as “Heat Transfer,” indicated with green in Figure 2.
Then, in the upper bar, it was clicked on “Boundary” and “Boundary
2.3 | Simulation conditions
mode,” thus, allowing the insertion of the boundary conditions.
Once obtained the experimental data, it was calculated the thermal
The model analyzed allows constant upper surface temperature,
diffusivity of foods by means of Matlab. From this, simulations were
whereas for the other surfaces are considered adiabatic. To insert the
carried out in PDETOOL, where input parameters such as thermal dif- surface boundary condition, it was selected on the upper line of the
fusivity (α), surface temperature (Ts), initial temperature (Ti), diameter model the condition type “Dirichlet” and inserted the surface temper-
of container (D), thermocouple depth (x), and time (t) were previously ature (in Kelvin), when it became constant in the experiments, as seen
provided. The simulations had as result temperature values at 0.06 m in Figure 4.
of depth, thus it was compared with experimental data, in order to val- For adiabatic surfaces, it was selected the condition type
idate the method. “Neumann,” inserted heat flux and heat transfer coefficient nulls, as
To carry out the simulations, it is necessary to follow certain can be seen in Figure 5.
steps, first, draw the model to be studied and then select the type of Then, in the upper bar, it was selected “PDE,” “PDE Mode,” and
simulation that is desired to perform, in this case, heat transfer. after, inserted some material properties, as seen in Figure 6.
After these steps, it must configure the contour conditions and It was selected the PDE type as “Parabolic.” By the fact there is
model properties, such as density, for example. Then it is required to not intern heat source in the model and the heat transfer by convec-
configure solution parameters, which include the initial model tem- tion can be ignored, since the surface temperature is constant and
perature and time. Finally, select the desired mesh and then execute there are not changes of heat with the boundary, it was attributed
the simulation. zero to those parameters.
In the upper bar, shown in Figure 2, in “Draw,” the “Rectan- In Equation (1), if density and heat capacity were considered as
gle/Square” tool was selected, and then it was drawn a rectangle unit values, the heat conduction coefficient would become the ther-
of width equal to diameter of the aluminum container and height mal diffusivity. This alternative process was used due to the lack of a
equal to the distance from upper surface to thermocouple inside specific place to insert the diffusivity. The value of heat conduction
the flour. coefficient was obtained from the experiments.
Data of diameter, height, and rectangle centralization can be seen Last, the values of time and initial temperature were inserted, as
in Figure 3. shown in Figure 7.
As shown in Figure 7, the processing time was inserted such as 1. Constant surface temperature, T(0,t) = Ts:
the available time to experimental data acquisition, whereas, the initial
temperature defined by u(T0), it was inserted as inner temperature of T ðx,tÞ −Ts x
= erf pffiffiffiffiffiffiffi : ð2Þ
Ti − Ts 2 /t
flour when the surface temperature became constant.
To create a mesh, it was selected in the upper bar the option
2. Constant heat flux on the surface, q00 s = q00 0:
“Mesh” and “Meshmode.” Thus, it was made a double mesh refine-
ment in order to improve the results accuracy. kðTs − Ti Þ
q00 sðtÞ = pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi : ð3Þ
π/t
2.4 | Mathematical modeling /t0:5 2 00
2q00 0 π −x q 0*x x
T ðx,tÞ −Ti = × exp − × erfc pffiffiffiffiffiffiffi : ð4Þ
Temperature distribution analysis in a semi-infinite solid have been k 4/t k 2 /t
much discussed, as shown in the studies of Singh et al. (2006) and Log
(2016), especially in mathematical applications of heat transfer theory 3. Convection on the surface, − k ∂T
∂x ðx = 0Þ = h½T ∞ − T ð0, tÞ:
vides a useful idealization for many practical situations, such as ment temperature, α and k the thermal diffusivity and thermal
determination of transient heat transfer near the earth and approxi- conductivity of the material, respectively, q"0 the heat flux on the
mations for some finite geometries as a thick flat wall, besides other surface, h the convective coefficient, and finally the Gauss error
Solutions for the heat equation in transient state in a semi-infinite as: 1 − erf.
FIGURE 5 Boundary conditions for side and bottom surfaces FIGURE 6 PDE specifications
MARI ET AL. 5 of 7
Temperatures ( C)
Wheat flour Cassava flour
T(x,t) 40.00 38.00
Ts 108.70 82.36
FIGURE 7 Data of iteration time and initial temperature
Ti 38.00 36.75
In this study Equation (2) has been used to determine the thermal
diffusivity of foods, because the experimental boundary conditions tendency after a certain instant of time. Hence, Equation (2) can be
were in accordance with the conditions required by this equation. used to determine the diffusivity.
The container used for this experiment is cylindrical; its diameter With respect to the time of 5,000 s after stabilization, this choice
is 0.084 m. For this case was considered a semi-infinite solid, thus, is justified because it is necessary enough time to occur temperature
there is only one-dimensional heat conduction in the direction of its variation at position of thermocouple.
length, since the lamp positioning generated action only in this direc- Furthermore, it was attributed a distance from upper surface of
tion and there was no other significant heat source that influenced 0.06 m to measure the temperature of flours. Table 1 shows the tem-
other directions. This can be seen in Equation (2), which is influenced peratures obtained via experiments and used for solution of
only by the temperature variation at x-direction. Therefore, the con- Equation (2).
Through to the data from Table 1, Equation (2) was solved by
tainer geometry does not influence on mathematical modeling of heat
means of Matlab, providing the thermal diffusivity values of
transfer.
7.4838 × 10−8 and 7.3997 × 10−8 m2/s for wheat flour and cassava,
respectively.
4 | CONC LU SION
FIGURE 11 Temperature distribution in the plane diameter × height
to cassava flour The objective of this work was achieved, because it was shown a
practical application of heat transfer study by means of experiments,
besides inclusion of a computational tool, PDETOOL, favoring the
Experiments usually help and facilitate engineering students
understanding and visualization of proposed case.
learning, because it provides an excellent opportunity to apply theo-
In the experiment carried out with wheat flour was obtained a
retical knowledge into practice. In the same way, software is an essen-
value of thermal diffusivity of 7.4838 × 10−8 m2/s and a temperature
tial tool, not only as teaching instrument, but also as principal support
of 40.00 C at 0.06 m of depth, after 5,000 s of stabilization point.
for resolution of complex problems.
On the other hand, by means of simulation, it was found a tempera-
ture of 42.20 C at the same conditions, representing only 5.5% of
3.2 | Simulation using Matlab PDETOOL error, what indicates correct obtaining of diffusivity via experiment.
For cassava flour case, the experimental value of diffusivity was
After obtaining the experimental data, such as thermal diffusivity,
7.3997 × 10−8 m2/s and temperature of 38.00 C. Whereas at simula-
initial and surface temperatures, it was performed simulations
tion, it was obtained 39.40 C, resulting in an error <3.7%. Those
using PDETOOL, where the results are shown in Figures 10
results lead again to experimental validity.
and 11.
Although Figures 10 and 11 illustrate the temperature gradient
into the solid, it is not clear what the temperature on the bottom sur- 5 | NO ME NC L A TUR E
face of the model. Therefore, it was carried out a three-dimensional
α thermal diffusivity (m2/s)
surface plot to check correctly the bottom surface temperature, as
ρ density (kg/m3)
can be seen in Figures 12 and 13.
cp specific heat (J/kg/K)
Analyzing Figures 12 and 13, it can be verified that the internal
D diameter (m)
temperature of wheat and cassava flour are 315.20 K (42.20 C) and
erf Gauss error function
312.40 K (39.40 C), respectively.
erfc Gauss complementary error function
h convective coefficient (W/m2/K)
k thermal conductivity (W/m/K)
q00 0 constant heat flux on surface (W/m2)
q00 s heat flux on surface (W/m2)
t time (s)
Ti initial temperature (K)
Ts surface temperature (K)
T(x,t) temperature at x and t (K)
T∞ environment temperature (K)
x depth (m)
ORCID
FIGURE 12 The 3D surface plot to wheat flour João Mari http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0673-158X
MARI ET AL. 7 of 7
RE FE R ENC E S Markowski, M., Bialobrzewski, I., Cierach, M., & Paulo, A. (2004). Determi-
nation of thermal diffusivity of Lyoner type sausages during water bath
Anvisa. (1996). Ordinance No. 354, July 18, 1996. Brasília: National Health
cooking and cooling. Journal of Food Engineering, 65(4), 591–598.
Surveilance Agency. Retrieved from http://www.anvisa.gov.br/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.02.025
anvisalegis/portarias/354_96.htm.
Mathworks. (2016). Partial differential equation toolbox, July 21. Retrieved
Bairi, A., Laraqi, N., & de María, J. M. G. (2007). Determination of thermal
from http://www.mathworks.com/help/pde/.
diffusivity of foods using 1D Fourier cylindrical solution. Journal of
Mauricio, V. J., & Francisco, S. W. (2017). Modeling heat transfer during
Food Engineering, 78(2), 669–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.
blanching of cubic particles of loche (Cucurbita Moschata Duch.) and
2005.11.004
potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) using finite difference method. Journal
Ball, C. O., & Olson, F. C. W. (1957). Sterilization in food technology: Theory,
of Food Process Engineering, 40(3), e12451. https://doi.org/10.1111/
practice and calculation (1st ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
jfpe.12451
Betta, G., Rinaldi, M., Barbanti, D., & Massini, R. (2009). A quick method
Muramatsu, Y., Greiby, I., Mishra, D. K., & Dolan, K. D. (2017). Rapid
for thermal diffusivity estimation: Application to several foods. Journal
inverse method to measure thermal diffusivity of low-moisture foods.
of Food Engineering, 91(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.
Journal of Food Science, 82(2), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/
2008.08.003
1750-3841.13563
Carciofi, B. A. M., Faistel, J., Aragão, G. M. F., & Laurindo, J. B. (2002).
Pohndorf, R. S., Rocha, J. C., da Lindemann, I., Peres, W. B., Oliveira, M., …
Determination of thermal diffusivity of mortadella using actual cooking
Elias, M. C. (2017). Physical properties and effective thermal diffusivity
process data. Journal of Food Engineering, 55(1), 89–94. https://doi.
of soybean grains as a function of moisture content and broken ker-
org/10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00029-8
nels. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 41, e12626.
Carslaw, H. S., & Jaeger, J. C. (1986). Conduction of heat in solids (2nd ed.).
Rocha, A. B. (2011). Implementação de um programa computacional para
London: Oxford University Press.
auxílio ao projeto de freios automotivos utilizando técnicas de metodologia
Carzino, M. C. (2006). Projeto e análise para dimensionamento automático
de projeto [Implementation of a computer program to assist the design of
de fornos para cozimento de pães e biscoitos [Design and analysis for
automotive brakes using design methodology techniques] (master thesis).
automatic sizing of ovens to cook breads and biscuits] (master thesis).
São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos,
Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil. Retrieved from
Brazil. Retrieved from http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/
http://www.pgmec.ufpr.br/dissertacoes/dissertacao_068.pdf.
18/18146/tde-26102011-234252/pt-br.php.
Dotto, G. L., Pinto, L. A. A., & Moreira, M. F. P. (2016). Determination of
Singh, R. P. (1982). Thermal diffusivity in food processing. Food Technology,
the effective thermal diffusivity in a porous bed containing rice grains:
36, 87–91.
Effects of moisture content and temperature. Heat and Mass Transfer,
Singh, A., Singh, I. V., & Prakash, R. (2006). Meshless analysis of unsteady-state
52(4), 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-015-1604-5
heat transfer in semi-infinite solid with temperature-dependent thermal
Erdogdu, F. (2008). A review on simultaneous determination of thermal
conductivity. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer,
diffusivity and heat transfer coefficient. Journal of Food Engineering,
33(2), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2005.
86(3), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.10.019
10.008
Incropera, F. P., Dewitt, D. P., Bergman, T. L., & Lavine, A. S. (2006). Fundamen-
tals of heat and mass transfer (6th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Log, T. (2016). Water droplets evaporating on horizontal semi-infinite
solids at room temperature. Applied Thermal Engineering, 93, 214–222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.09.108
Magee, T. R. A., & Bransburg, T. (1995). Measurement of thermal diffusiv- How to cite this article: Mari J, Mari M, Ferreira M,
ity of potato, malt bread and wheat flour. Journal of Food Engineering, Conceição W, Andrade C. A simple method to estimate the
25(2), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-8774(94)00025-5 thermal diffusivity of foods. J Food Process Eng. 2018;e12821.
Mapa. (1995). Livestock and food supply. Ordinance No. 554, August
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12821
30, 1995. Brasília: Ministry of Agriculture. Retrieved from http://www.
codapar.pr.gov.br/arquivos/File/pdf/farinhamandioca554_95.pdf.