WRITING TASK 2 (It will not be exaggeration)

It will not be an exaggeration if I claim that the

topic “public health” captures my mind immediately as it is of equal concern for
human beings on the surface of earth. In lieu of multiple opinions, first group
categorically opines that public health is a mandatory subject for all and sundry
because sound health of public can only ensure the survival and epitome of
physical grandeur of human species. And, on the contrary, others assert that
public health can be dealt on ordinary grounds because there is no need of
draining astronomical resources in this sector due to its respective priority in
queue of other national challenges.

Referring to the opinion of those who declare

that modern age owes a variety of public health issues yet, responsible nations
are on the way of research and execution of the policies framed for the
improvement of public health on large scale. I, no doubt, have realistic reasons
behind my assertion in the sense that they further establish that public health,
today, has become a global concern setting aside regional preferences
because global interaction.

Moving on to the opinion of the others in this

regard, they are more enthusiastic while commenting that public health should
be given fractional consideration because apart from it, there are a lot of issues
with more gravity in the lives of the nations like defence, economy,
agriculture, politics and education as well. They further elaborate that public
health is mutual responsibility of individuals and governments as well, giving
an impression that it is more logical and natural.

Now, in the light of both above-mentioned

views, it would not suffice to arrive at conclusion more viably. To sum up the
topic, it is evident that neither public health can be ignored nor it can be
considered wholesome of nation’s life. I would like to assert that a need-based
approach will be more workable in ensuring sound public health as it is back
bone of a nation’s strength. Quoting a glaring example of Nepal where
government has recently opened more than 10000 health care units for public
health.
 Writing task 2(Recalling)
Recalling last two decades reminds me of
the drastic changes and heated discussions regarding dance and music as
important part of culture on a large scale in different strata of society.
Advocates of the topic are of the view that dance and music penetrate into
human soul with force, and later on, handles the strings of their thoughts and
actions. Whereas, opponents categorically opine that music and dance as part
of a culture is a rubbish activity because culture should only represent national
vision and goals only. So prima facie, it seems complicated to draw a single
conclusion.
Quoting the glaring example of Hindu
culture which is enriched with dance and music will bring us at ease to discuss
the worthy opinions of the advocates of the topic. They further establish that
music and dance both are genres or art which are meant to spark the
disillusioned souls. It can also be reckoned that music and dance are mere
natural flares and such things should not be kept aloof from cultural spectrum.
Now, on the contrary, others establish
that dance and music are mere activities of time past they should not be
introduced and promoted likewise due to a variety of reasons. Both make
human being impractical, unconscious, irrational and spiritually starved. In the
same fashion, they go to the extent of saying that music and dance are only the
part of those cultures which are themselves incapacitated for the execution of
national vision and goals. Certainly, the example of Muslim culture will
support their view point.
To conclude the whole discussion, we
may assert that music and dance are important of part of most of the cultures
of the world today. It depends upon the socio-political system of a state which
either allows dance and music as important norm of a culture or it condemns
it on the ground of rationality and pragmatism as well. Bringing in the example
of Pakistan where both spectrums exist simultaneously, will definitely
strengthen our moderate views in this regard.
 Writing task (Literally Speaking)
Literally speaking, the given topic role of media is of
common interest as it has close relevance to our life, people have divergent
speculations about functions of media along with its positive impacts i.e.
awareness, enlightenment, success and acknowledgment. On the contrary,
media exploits civil rights, ruins the lives of helpless people and becomes
puppet in the hands of those who are on the helm of affairs. But, I will love to
take up the subject according to my point of view in detail because it has a
universal appeal with multiple aspects.
First of all, advocates of first perspective claim that,
media is making people aware of day to day issues. It has become
fundamental source of enlightenment which is mandatory for peoples’ success
and development. Accordingly, it would be equally appropriate to explain
another possible side of the same that media is also paving way for their
success and awareness pertaining to most emergent issues of modern age.
In actuality, the opponents of the subject under
discussion are of the view that media is always biased and prejudiced and even
puppet in the hands of influential people. They want to hunt their fishy
motives while misusing role of media. Their view point, too, cannot be
overlooked as it clarifies the evil picture of role of media. So, we can assert that
it is almost unacceptable to avoid them.
In culmination of above lines, we may opine that
media is being used both for welfare as well demise of nations across the
globe. So, after this comprehensive dissertation, we can say that it not the
media itself rather it is its usage of the same which brings forth its respective
implications. And last but not the least, selection of proper direction always
plays a positive role. And I would love to quote a last example and that is of Geo
News which has gained ground in Pakistan with both its positive and biased
role.