Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
English 102
8 September 2018
“Minimalism is a tool to rid yourself of life’s excess in favor of focusing on what’s important, so
In Graham Hill’s NY Times commentary, Living with Less. A Lot Less, in which he
examines the effect that material goods have on the happiness in our lives, Hill creates an
informational yet aggressive tone through the article with the use the of persuasive strategies,
Pathos and Ethos. Using these strategies to convey to the Reader, that consuming material goods
only led to bad results and a hoarding problem. He attempts to convince the public that
consumerism led to not happiness, but dissatisfaction. While he does use two persuasive
strategies, his argument lacks content in Ethos. Hill fails to explain in an in-depth analysis as to
why America’s endless consumption of materials goods does not actually lead to an increase in
happiness.
Hill starts out his commentary article by explaining his minimalistic lifestyle, living in a
having very few clothes and using only two bowls in is house. For the introduction, Hill sticks
with using Pathos as his persuasive strategy. He describes to the audience how through a
minimalistic lifestyle, he became wealthy and describes a time when he and his partner sold their
Selvester 2
Internet consultancy company for more money than he could ever imagine. Like any other
person would, Hill bought a large house, designer clothes, accessories, and a ton of gadgets as
well as a nice luxury car. But Hill had reached a point in his life where he had more money to
spend than he knew what to do with. He was “filthy rich” at this point in his life. Hill realized
that he could have and did have all the materials items one could ever want, yet he was
dissatisfied (Hill 309). He uses Pathos effectively in the introduction, and after the audience can
connect with Hill on an emotional level. Many can relate to him when he describes buying
In the body of his commentary article, Hill abruptly switches his persuasive strategy from
Pathos to Ethos. He starts out by explaining that he now owned two homes to himself and
stressed the idea that he was not the only one who’s life was clustered with excess belongings
(Hill 309). He also uses logos by citing credible sources and studies that explain that almost
everyone is using more space than necessary to live like he was. He lists facts from these
studies to explain America’s wastefulness saying, “We take up more than 3 times the amount of
space per capita than we did 60 years ago...America has a $22 billion personal storage industry
plays a big part in pushing our planet to the brink of its inevitable end” (310). Hill ends the body
of his article with a rhetorical question, “Does all this endless consumption result in measurably
increased happiness” (311)? While most of the body paragraphs did succeed in providing
credible sources to support his logos fueled argument, the author fails to explain in-depth as to
why America’s endless consumption of materials goods does not actually lead to an increase in
happiness.
Selvester 3
In the closing of his commentary, Hill returns to his first persuasive strategy, Pathos,
connecting with our inner emotions. As Hill discusses how he began to start an emotional
relationship with a woman. After this his attachment to materials goods eventually faded, and he
now focused his life on his relationships with others more than his relationships with material
goods. Hill now talks about his personal experiences such as trips with his friend, his idea of
starting a company that focused on the environmentally friendly bio-degradable cups and starting
an environmental design blog (Hill 311). This effectively helps the audience to connect with him
on an emotional level. It shows his audience that the highlights of our life are our relationships
with people and the experiences we have, not our relationships with material goods and its
endless consumption. The whole conclusion is focused on Pathos, in which he explains that there
ultimately is no connection between material goods and long-lasting happiness, but that there is a
connection to happiness and with the irreplaceable experiences and emotional relationships we
Hill’s use of the persuasive strategies, Pathos Ethos and a little logos, tend to be effective
in persuading the audience. His idea that only our experiences and emotional relationships with
others will give one long-lasting happiness rather than the endless consumerism of material
goods. However, his use of Pathos works in some instances and doesn’t in others. He does an
excellent job helping the reader connect with his emotional side, elaborating more on his
personal experiences, such as the relationships he has with his friends and family. This is
something the audience can connect to very well, but what the audience will struggle to connect
to is in the introduction when he describes his wealthy lifestyle; where he has more money than
he knows what to spend on. Not many can relate to being able to endlessly consume material
goods. Majority of people are living a middle-class lifestyle, spending conservatively. This is
Selvester 4
where Hill falls short for most of his article, but when he closes the commentary with liberal use
of pathos he manages to bring the audience back to relate to his emotionally charged statements.
The main point he succeeds to push across is that: the happiness in our lives will ultimately be
led and influenced by our relationships with others and not by the value of our material goods.
Selvester 5
Works Cited
Hill, Graham. “Living with Less. A Lot Less.” Pursuing Happiness: A Bedford Spotlight Reader.
Ed. Matthew Parfitt and Dawn Skorczewski. Bedford/St. Martin's, 2016. 308-312