0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
14 Ansichten24 Seiten
This paper examines the discourse and practices of multiculturalism in South Korean politics. In less than a decade, many Koreans have embraced multiculturalism as both a policy and newly developing worldview based on "tolerance" and "acceptance" of cultural differences. Originally political activists introduced the idea of multiculturalism as a way to acknowledge “difference” and criticize nationalist myths of pure blood. By 2005 the State had incorporated multiculturalism into its immigration policies that featured “international marriages” to address the problem of low fertility rates and foreign workers to deal with labor shortages. In addition to the practical approaches to dealing with demographic problems associated with an "aging society." In contrast to these narratives of progress, I will trace the way Korean multiculturalism – much like multiculturalism in the United States, Western Europe, and Japan – grew from labor conflict. Multiculturalism is part and parcel of the larger “neoliberal” policy frameworks that have marginalized Korean workers and eroded their working conditions and rights in the name of “flexibility.” Multiculturalism refocuses the sources of conflict in terms of culture and thereby sidesteps the most significant threats to political stability in the growing economic disparity among rich and poor Koreans.
This paper examines the discourse and practices of multiculturalism in South Korean politics. In less than a decade, many Koreans have embraced multiculturalism as both a policy and newly developing worldview based on "tolerance" and "acceptance" of cultural differences. Originally political activists introduced the idea of multiculturalism as a way to acknowledge “difference” and criticize nationalist myths of pure blood. By 2005 the State had incorporated multiculturalism into its immigration policies that featured “international marriages” to address the problem of low fertility rates and foreign workers to deal with labor shortages. In addition to the practical approaches to dealing with demographic problems associated with an "aging society." In contrast to these narratives of progress, I will trace the way Korean multiculturalism – much like multiculturalism in the United States, Western Europe, and Japan – grew from labor conflict. Multiculturalism is part and parcel of the larger “neoliberal” policy frameworks that have marginalized Korean workers and eroded their working conditions and rights in the name of “flexibility.” Multiculturalism refocuses the sources of conflict in terms of culture and thereby sidesteps the most significant threats to political stability in the growing economic disparity among rich and poor Koreans.
This paper examines the discourse and practices of multiculturalism in South Korean politics. In less than a decade, many Koreans have embraced multiculturalism as both a policy and newly developing worldview based on "tolerance" and "acceptance" of cultural differences. Originally political activists introduced the idea of multiculturalism as a way to acknowledge “difference” and criticize nationalist myths of pure blood. By 2005 the State had incorporated multiculturalism into its immigration policies that featured “international marriages” to address the problem of low fertility rates and foreign workers to deal with labor shortages. In addition to the practical approaches to dealing with demographic problems associated with an "aging society." In contrast to these narratives of progress, I will trace the way Korean multiculturalism – much like multiculturalism in the United States, Western Europe, and Japan – grew from labor conflict. Multiculturalism is part and parcel of the larger “neoliberal” policy frameworks that have marginalized Korean workers and eroded their working conditions and rights in the name of “flexibility.” Multiculturalism refocuses the sources of conflict in terms of culture and thereby sidesteps the most significant threats to political stability in the growing economic disparity among rich and poor Koreans.
Beyond Multiculturalism
Toward Interculturalism
Edited by
Jung Ok Lee
(@ CMPress=
Contradictions in the Comforting
Images of a “New” South Korea
Abstract
This paper examines the discourse and practices of
multiculturalism in South Korean polities. In less than a decade, a
surprising number of Koreans have embraced multiculturalism as both
a policy and newly developing worldview based on “tolerance” and
“acceptance” of cultural differences. Originally political activists
introduced the idea of multiculturalism as a way to acknowledge
“difference” and criticize nationalist myths of pure blood. By 2005 the
State had incorporated multiculturalism into its immigration policies
that featured “international marriages” to address the problem of low
fertility rates and foreign workers to deal with labor shortages. In
addition to the practical approaches to dealing with demographic
problems associated with an “aging society,” the Korean government
actively uses its multicultural policies for a public relations campaign
as a symbol of the nation's progress as a “maturing” democracy. In
contrast to such narratives of progress and reform, I will trace the way
(Chartor 3. Mitcutuclsm end Cass Caf: Cotcictons inthe Confoinglmoges of 2 New? South Kres @ OS