Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PIA
“Production of Heptenes From Propylene and Butenes”
Transferencia de calor
Ingeniería Química
Maestra: Dra. MARGARITA
LOREDO CANCINO
Grupo:01
Students Matrícula
José María Camargo Quezada 1792524
Israel Castañeda Ruiz 1671403
Marcelo Montemayor 1674756
Fernández
Andres Zavala Díaz 1792492
San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, martes del 29 de mayo del 2018
Introduction
In this project our main objective is to research a chemical process to design and
determine the dimensions and types of heat exchangers. We are investigating about a
certain process; this process is the production of heptenes from propylene and butene.
The main function of the process is to convert a mixture of unsaturated hydrocarbons,
especially C3 and C4, into 1-heptene and other unsaturated products. The diagram for the
process will be listed and explained below. The market targets 1-heptene as a primary
product, for having high octane, as a blending agent for gasoline, also it would work in
the production of plasticizers. The reactions that take place in the process are the
following:
The set of reactions that form the process are considered exothermic reactions,
that’s why the reactor must have a good heat removal rate to keep the system within its
limits. During the process all the hydrocarbon components are said to be stable, this
means that no azeotrope is found in the process.
We decided to design 4 heat exchangers, using previous knowledge from our
classes and research found in books and the internet, we were able to find the
characteristics of the exchangers. The formulas that we used were the ones we learned
during this semester in heat transfer, the data and information about the process was
obtained in the book “Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes” Appendix
B by the author Richard Turton. With all the information gathered we looked for the best
possible heat exchanger that would benefit more efficiently the production of 1-hepente.
Besides our 4 heat exchangers we decided to add 3 centrifugal pumps to the
process, we think that with the use of this centrifugal pumps the flow rate would be better
than without them. Below we will continue to explain how each exchanger and pump was
design as well as the results for each one. Also, we design another heat exchanger and
we compared it to another exchanger to see which one of the two would be better.
Methodology
The analysis among the heat exchangers before seen, we’ve got two typical cases
in this industrial process. First, at the end of the synthesis of heptenes, the products
need to get cold with cooling water, the exchangers marked with the numbers 1207,
1210 and 1211 complete this mission. In addition, the flow mass rate in these lines are
so low that the heat transfer area is lower than 20 m2 and in these situations, we need
to use the typical double pipe heat exchangers which are so common in this kind of
industries. The methodology used is showing below.
Start
Calculate:
Qwater=mwaterCp∆T
Qwater=Qmixture
Qmixture=mmixtureCp(Tprom)∆T
𝑇1 + 𝑇2
Tprom =
2
∆T = T2 - T1
𝑄𝑎𝑔𝑢𝑎 𝑇 +𝑇
= 𝐶𝑝( 1 2)(T2 - T1)
𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑧𝑐𝑙𝑎 2
Solve for T2
1) 𝐷ℎ = 𝐷𝑒𝑥𝑡 − 𝐷𝑖𝑛𝑡
Solve for Dh, which is the transversal area
from the interior line and the transversal 2) 𝐴 𝑇𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝐴𝑛𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 = 𝐴𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑡 −
area from the annular line. 𝐴𝑒𝑥𝑡 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜
1) 𝑉̇ = 𝑚̇/𝜌
Solve for the velocity of the Flow rate and 2) 𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑 = 𝑉̇ /𝐴𝑡
then solve the following: Re, Pr, F, Nu, y h.
𝐶𝑝∗𝜇
3)𝑃𝑟 = 𝐾
𝑉∗𝐷ℎ∗𝜌
4) 𝑅𝑒 = 𝜇
0.25
5) f = 2
1 5.74
[log( 𝐷 + 0.9 )]
3.7∗( ) 𝑅𝑒
𝜖
𝑓
( )∗(𝑅𝑒−1000)∗𝑃𝑟
8
8) Nu = 𝑓
2
1+12.7∗( )0.5 ∗(𝑃𝑟 3 −1)
8
𝑁𝑢∗𝐾
9) h= 𝐷
1
U= 1 1
Calculate the total transfer coefficient, U. + +𝑅𝑖𝑛𝑡+𝑅𝑒𝑥𝑡
ℎ𝑖 ℎ𝑜
𝛥𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑑∗𝑉 2 ∗𝐿
Calculate the pressure drop, ∆P, produced 1) =
𝜌 2∗𝑔𝑐∗𝐷
inside the lines, in the annular section and 𝛥𝑃𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑓𝑑∗𝑉 2 ∗𝐿
2) =
in the margins. 𝜌 2∗𝑔𝑐∗𝐷ℎ
𝛥𝑃ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑠 4∗𝑛∗𝑉 2
3) =
𝜌 2∗𝑔𝑐
Compare the pressure drops, the area and the length with the
values reported from the literature, in order to determine if they
are in conditions for the design of our exchangers.
End
Diagram 1. Methodology
Formulas
Equations that were used for the design of the following exchanger were the following:
❖ Flow Area.
𝑚̇ 𝜋𝐷 2
𝐴𝑓 = = 𝑛𝑇
𝜌𝑉 4
𝐷𝑠 𝐶𝐵
𝑎𝑠 = 𝑃𝑇
𝑚̇
𝐺𝑠 =
𝑎𝑠
Reynolds.
𝐷𝑒 𝐺𝑠
𝑅𝑒 = 𝜇
❖ Number of dividers.
𝐿
𝑛=𝐵
𝛥𝑃 𝐺𝑠 2 𝐷𝑠 (𝑛+1)
= 𝑓𝑠
𝜌 2𝑔𝐷𝑒 𝜌2
𝑓 = 1.728𝑅𝑒𝑠 −0.188
❖ Global heat transfer coefficient
𝐷
1 1 1 1 𝑅𝑓,𝑖 ln( 𝑜⁄𝐷𝑖) 𝑅𝑓,𝑜 1
𝑈
=𝑈𝐴 =𝑈 =𝑅=ℎ𝐴 + + + +ℎ
𝑖 𝑖 𝑜 𝐴𝑜 𝑖 𝑖 𝐴𝑖 2𝜋𝑘𝐿 𝐴𝑜 𝑜 𝐴𝑜
❖ Heat flow
𝑄 = 𝑚̇𝐶𝑝 𝛥𝑇
❖ Heat flow
𝑄 = 𝑈𝐴𝑠 𝛥𝑇𝑙𝑚
❖ 𝛥𝑇lim
𝛥𝑇1 −𝛥𝑇2
𝛥𝑇𝑙𝑚 = 𝛥𝑇1
𝑙𝑛( )
𝛥𝑇2
❖ Nusselt
ℎ𝐷
𝑁𝑢 = 𝑘
❖ Prandtl
𝜇𝐶𝑝
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘
𝑁𝑢 = 0.023𝑅𝑒 0.8 𝑃𝑟 𝑛
n=0.4 when the fluid is heated n=0.3 when the fluid is cooled
𝑓
( )𝑅𝑒𝑃𝑟
8
𝑁𝑢 = 𝑓 0.5
1+12.7( ) (𝑃𝑟 2/3 −1)
8
❖ Friction
0.25
𝑓= 5.74 2
[𝑙𝑜𝑔(3.7(𝜀/𝐷)+ )]
𝑅𝑒0.9
Yes
If ΔP>0.7 and 1
Qdesigned<<Qneeded
END
Diagram 2. Methodology
Heat Exchangers models
In this section we present the design proposals to the different heat exchangers that were
selected to be studied, we intend to improve the heat exchange by proposing several
types of configurations. Tables are presented with the results, with which the best option
can be evaluated quantitatively
Heat exchanger – 1202
For this heat exchanger, the area that we
approached, if it was a double pipe heat exchanger,
was almost 80 m2 (look the table 1) which means
that it’s impossible to create this kind of exchanger
because the area was far big. So, in this case, we
need to design a shell and tube heat exchanger
because of the superficial area.
We put the water in the tube side because of its viscosity, higher temperature and fouling
number, so in this way the cleaning maintaining is easier than the other way. You can
look the heuristics for this kind of the decision in appendix 3.
There are so many heuristics that we need to consult before we start to design our own
shell and tube heat exchanger, you need to consult the several appendixes that we have
at the end of this document.
There are so many values that we need to suppose in this case which are listed in the
next chart. The length and diameters were selected because of economical strategy.
Values supposed
Configuration Quadrangular Triangular
Tube side
Length (m) 7.3152 (24 ft) 7.3152 (24 ft)
External diameter (m) 0.01905 0.01905
BWG 12 12
Inner diameter* (m) 0.0021082 0.0021082
Possible velocity (m/seg) 1.25 0.94
Number of passes * 553 745
Fouling 0.00021803
Shell side
Diameter (m) 0.7336 0.7874
Clearance* 0.00365 0.00365
Baffle spacing* (m) 0.3683 0.3937
Baffle cut *(%) 25 25
Fouling 0.0001755
Number of passes 1
Table 3 Values supposed in the exchanger E-1202
You can find the values marked with * in the appendix 1 and 2.
The results that we have in this design is showing in the following chart.
Results
Coefficients Quadrangular Triangular
Comparing both designs, we know right away which one is better than other, the
quadrangular doesn’t have a higher drop pressure than the triangular one, furthermore,
the over designed area is much lower. This one of our options among the different
combinations of design that you could obtain in this tubular heat exchanger.
Discussions
There are several ways to obtain the exchanger that you need, but you need to know that
it’s difficult to pick up a choice, in this case, the strong recommendation that we need to
clarify it’s to restrain the drop pressure at minimum, because this means that there will be
some economical losses. On the other hand, this heat exchanger that we calculated it’s
over designed because of the fouling factors that we included, so basically the exchanger
will bring more heat that it’s intended to satisfy, thus the engineering must be aware of
this situation, so it’s possible that the amount of your fluid service is going to be less at
the beginning, consequently there could be some savings because of this.
We’ll compare the total heat transfer coefficient that it’s reported at the literature, you can
take look at the different values of the coefficients in specific cases in appendix 4.
U reported (W/m2-°C) U obtained (W/m2-°C)
300 - 1000 935.82
Table 5 exchanger E-1202
Heat exchanger – 1207
In this case, the heat exchanger area
is lower than 20 m2, so we could
expect a double pipe design. This
exchanger is important to cool the
products at the end of the process and
then store them.
Figure 2 Heat Exchanger 1207
The data we obtained in this
exchanger is showing in the next chart.
There are so many data reported including, molar fraction, components, pressure and
other things that we decided to cover it to save space. Then, we need to calculate de
different properties of the mix that we don’t have, using different correlations that learned
in the past semesters. We obtained this:
The pipe characteristics in this exchanger were selected according several books of
process heat transfer, the diameters are predeterminate in IPS (Iron Pipe Size) and you
could use the number of the hair pins as you need, but it’s important to control de drop
pressure. The diameters that we used is 1 ¼ in that it’s so common.
Table 7 Pipe characteristics
The results in the exchanger E-1207 are showing below, we obtain the total heat transfer
coefficient through the properties and the correlations.
Figure 4 E-1207
After that, we obtain a commercial length that we’re going to use to calculate de different
models, for example, to use a 12-ft length pipe we need to use three hair pins with a
commercial length and then we approximate the drop pressure and compare which one
is the best option.
Figure 5 E-1207
Discussion
The three options above, the best one is the 20-length pipe because the drop pressure is
the lowest and beside the over area designed is the lowest, so practically we don’t waste
money because of the commercial standards.
Figure 6 E-1207
The heat exchanger that was redesign was the one with the I-1210 label in the DTI of the
process. In the next table we have data that corresponds to the fluid that passes by the exchanger,
in which you can observe the conditions for pressure, temperature and composition, which were
of help, so we could obtain the properties of the mixture of hydrocarbons.
Table 9.
Because we had no value for a temperature at the exit, we proceeded in calculating it using an
energy balance, the heat gained by the water would be the same as the heat loss of the mixture.
With this we found the value of the heat and the temperature at the exit was our only variable, so
we proceeded in finding the temperature at the conditions given.
Now that we had the temperature at the exit, we proceed into calculating the upcoming variables
which will be shown in the table below, all these calculations were necessary to obtain the design,
including its length, of the exchanger I-1210.
Table 10.
Once we obtained our length that we needed, it was necessary the knowledge about “Commercial
design” that fitted our necessities and determined which of them was better using the diameters
we needed. In the next table you can observe which were the commercial designs that were
adjusted to our exchanger.
Table 11.
The next step was to analyze the pressure drops, what we were looking was to find a total
pressure less than 0.7, if the condition was accomplished then we could say that the design was
correct.
Table 12.
MIXTURE PROPERTIES
Tin (°C) 154
Tout (°C) 38.02260082
Tprom (K) 369.1613004
ΔT 115.9773992
Cpm (J/Kg K) 2255.80561
μm (Pa-s) 0.00027188
Km (W/m K) 0.1109
3
ρm (Kg/m ) 656.6264742
Table 15
Once we had all the properties, we started with the design of the heat exchanger. The first design
that was proposed was a concentric line design. Because the service flow current is greater we
decided for it to flow through the interior of the line, with this established, the hydrocarbon fluid
will flow trough the outside. Afterwards, with the commercial measurements, we proposed
diameters to obtain the transversal area.
With the establishment of these dimensions, it was possible for us to obtain the total heat
coefficient
OUTER PIPE INNER PIPE
Volumetric (m3/s) 0.000533 Volumetric (m3/s) 0.002152342
Velocity (m/s) 0.693487 Velocity (m/s) 2.230467136
Pr 5.530283402 Pr 4.856455774
Re 17314.41379 Re 110570.5123
ꬵ 0.034627849 ꬵ 0.023095815
Nu 140.6082071 Nu 675.4042635
hout 1508.39155 hin 11935.27661
Fout 0.0001755 Fin 0.00021803
U 876.9829095
Table 17.
Using the methodology established at the beginning, and once we knew the total heat coefficient,
we could obtain the superficial area for the heat transfer and with that value we proceeded in
getting the length of the heat exchanger E-511
DESIGN DIMENSIONS
Q (J/seg) 91567.86371
∆T1 (°C) 114
∆T2 (°C) 8.022600818
∆Tlm (°C) 39.93216402
Superficial Area (m2) 2.614743583
Design length (m) 19.74
Table 18.
In the previous table we can observe that the superficial area is less than 10 square meters, so
for this heat exchanger we can use a better model, that model will be concentric lines that will
flow in the opposite direction. This exchanger has big advantages such as its size, simplicity and
its prices, this makes it useful and it can be done in any workplace. Unfortunately, the exchangers
for concentric lines are design with standard measurements, because of this its design must be
adjusted into these parameters. The exchangers with double lines are generally ensembled in
lengths of 12, 15 or 20 ft. To make this type of adjustment we used margins, which enable the
connection between two lines without allowing surface of heat transfer. In the table below, we
show you the different possible configurations for this exchanger
Commercial Number of Length (m) Commercial Area of over
Length(ft) margins Area design (%)
12 2 3.6576 - -
3 14.6304 - -
4 18.288 - -
5 21.9456 2.906960539 11.17574045
15 1 4.572 -
2 13.716 -
3 18.288 2.422467116 7.353549623
4 22.86 3.028083895 15.80806297
20 1 6.096 - -
2 18.288 2.422467116 7.353549623
3 24.384 3.229956155 23.5286005
4 30.48 - -
Table 19
We can see that there is 5 possible ways of arranging this exchanger, but one of them counts
with a bigger area over design, with this established this one will be the first to be taken out of
consideration. Once the exchangers that were the better fit according to the area and length of
the design are analyzed, we can proceed to calculate the pressure drops. The following table
shows the pressure drops we obtained:
We can observe that out of the four possible arrangements for the design of this exchanger, the
one that has less pressure drop is the model with the length of 20 ft and 2 margins. Also, in the
table we can observe that this model has the least area of overdesign and because of these
characteristics it was the arrangement we chose for the exchanger E-511
Fluid Mechanics
During the process of the production of heptenes, six centrifugal pumps were used for the flow
rate of the mixture, but there was data missing from the suction line of three pumps, because of
this reason we only analyzed the three pumps with data on them. The results of the centrifugal
pumps are mere representative, the reason was that we proposed the dimensions for the lines to
make the analysis of the pumps.
This machine oversees the flow displacement of current number eleven, which come out from the
second separation tower as products and they are impulse by the pump into the third separation
tower.
For the analysis of this unit, we took the following considerations based in the process´
considerations.
Besides, proposals of the dimensions for the suction and discharge lines were made, as well as
the heights for the previous and following operations after the pump:
Proposed Data
Height Tower II 2 M
Height Tower II 3 M
Suction line length 3 M
Discharge line length 6 M
Suction line diameter 0.0508 M
Discharge line Diameter 0.1016 M
Table 21 P-504A/B
For this system, a pump NIZA 10.3M from the company Bombas Hasa, S.A. de C.V, was
proposed. The data for the pump´s efficiency, η, and it´s pressure drop, ∆P, were taken from the
reported values of the literature we investigated. The results that were obtained are the following:
Q (m3/h) H (m) P (kW) Η ∆P (Pa)
6.3563 24.655 0.637 0.4 150000
Table 22 P-504A/B
We can observe that the power that the pump requires for the flow rate conditions is not that
much, but this value we obtained looks alike as the one from the literature for this equipment.
So, we formulated a graph to determine the point of operation and analyze the system´s behavior,
which is shown in the figure below:
25.1
25
24.9
H [m]
24.8
24.7
24.6
24.5
0 2 4 6 8 10
Q [=] m3/h
Figure 7 P-504A/B
Because the pressure is too high, an increase in the flow rate will barely have any significant
effect in which pump head will be required by the pump to discharge the fluid.
CENTRIFUGAL PUMP P-505A/B
This unit oversees the flow displacement of currents number nine and ten, which come from the
reflux cylinder V-503 and are headed towards the second separation tower and the heat
exchanger E-507.
For this unit´s analysis the following were considered based on the process´ conditions:
POPOSED DATA
Height Tower II 3 m
Height Tank 1 m
Height Exchanger 0 m
Suction line length 3 m
Length division pump 1 m
Length division-tower II 6 m
Length division-exchanger 6 m
Diameter at the entrance of the pump 0.0508 in
Diameter at the exit of the pump 0.1016 in
Exchanger line diameter 0.052502 in
Table 24 P-505A/B
For this system we proposed a pump MO40-200A from the company Bombas Hasa, S.A. de C.V.
The data for the pump´s efficiency, η, and it´s pressure drop, ∆P, were taken from the reported
values of the literature we investigated. The results that were obtained are the following:
When we compared our results to the literature we observed a small percentage of the pump´s
power.
Power calculated (kW) Power from the literature %e
(kW)
2.23 2.15 3.53
Table 26 P-505A/B
Again, we formulated a graph to determine the point of operation and analyze the system´s
behavior.
48.5
47.5
46.5
H[m]
45.5
44.5
43.5
42.5
0 5 10 15
Q[=]m3/hr
Figure 8 P-505A/B
This equipment oversees the flow displacement of currents number twelve and thirteen, the ones
which come from the reflux cylinder V-505 into the third separation tower and the exchanger E-
510
For this unit´s analysis the following were considered based on the process´ conditions:
For this system we proposed a pump MO40-200B from the company Bombas Hasa, S.A. de C.V.
The data for the pump´s efficiency, η, and it´s pressure drop, ∆P, were taken from the reported
values of the literature we investigated. The results that were obtained are the following:
Comparing our results web served that the results we obtained look really alike as the real
reported value.
H[m]
44
42
40
0 5 10 15
Q[=]m3/hr
Figure 9 P-506A/B
As the past graphs, we can observe that the system doesn’t react a lot by increasing the flow
rate. This phenomenon occurs during the entire process and its main reason is that the pressure
drop from the centrifugal pumps throughout the system is big enough to make the effects of
friction, changes in kinetic energy and the potential flow to not be considered. A general
recommendation for this type of systems is to change all centrifugal pumps for positive
displacement pumps, the main reasons are that an enormous pressure gradient for a small flow.
In this way a save in energy will be made and you can save money.
Environmental Advantage
Throughout the years, climate in our planet has changed and in the most recent years it has
taken a path into affecting our ways of living. The problem is that humans are the one causing the
mayor environmental problems, and they are affecting the ozone layer. One of the primary
problems with the climate change is the green house effect. The green house effect involves what
is called the greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide is one of this greenhouse gases. Global
Warming Potential (GWP). GWP is an index simplified based on the properties of a gas that´s a
relative to the carbon dioxide and it is expressed, as mentioned before in kg of CO2.
In this work the impact of the electric energy generated that was used by each exchanger was
analyzed. A relative factor of 0.458 Kg CO2/kWh of electric energy was used. In the following table
are the results we obtained, taking into consideration the kWh that each equipment uses, the
mass flow rate, and the relative factor electricity-CO2 equivalency.
EXCHANGER Electricity 𝒎̇ [kg/h] CO2 equivalent
consumption [Kg CO2 eq*h/Kg of the fluid]
[kWh]
1 (I-1202) 37,062.24 1,840 9.225273882
2 (I-1207) 700.00 3,490 0.091862464
3 (I-1210) 1,275.45 8,900 0.065635517
4 (I-1211) 457.84 7,890 0.026576721
Table 30 Environmental
3) ℎ = 𝑁𝑢 ∗ 𝐾/𝐷
4) 𝑄 = ℎ ∗ ̇𝐴𝑠 ∗ ∆𝑇
Data used in exchanger E-1210
Exchanger 1202
D shell (m) 0.7366
242.1007799
As (m2)
45
T in (°C)
103
T out (°C)
25
T ∞ (°C)
T-Prom (°C) 74
8.68E+09
Ra
230.5578525
Nu
8.560626208
h (W/m2-°C)
101,553.8526
Q (J/seg)
The amount of kg/CO2 will be obtained by using the EPA calculator which gives us a CO2 quantity
that is emitted in terms of energy.
To make this numbers far more visible in equivalent kilograms of carbon dioxide will be shown
with some examples below
Exchanger E-1202 without isolation:
To make an approximated analysis of the actual costs of the equipment, a cost appendix for
industrial equipment was consulted. This appendix is based in correlations obtained from various
sources in which its main goal is to approximate the original price of the equipment.
𝑅𝑒𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎
𝑅𝑒𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 ∗ ( )𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎
In several references, various authors have estimated the fraction of the purchased equipment
cost that it takes to install the equipment. This generally included freight and shipping costs,
foundations, mounting, and simple electric and piping connections, such as switch gear, starters,
flange connections, and so on. Unfortunately, these numbers often vary widely, nevertheless, the
following equation lets you approximate the actual cost:
A similar number that also includes all the adjacent minor equipment and connections is
sometimes listed in the literature (principally by Guthrie 1975 and Ulrich 1984) covering the cost
of purchase and installation of the major equipment as well as all the supporting equipment around
each major unit. This is called the module factor and it is used in the following equation:
Price
Size 1(ft2) Size 1 (m2) Size 2 (m2) Cost 1 (USD) Factor Cost (USD) Cost (MXN)
830 76.89528345 242.1007799 20000 0.68 43625.01671 891695.3415
Table 31
Installation Costs
Retail Price Installation Factor Cost (USD) Cost (MXN)
43625.01671 1.61 70236.2769 1435629.5
Table 32
EXCHANGER E-507
Price
Size 1(ft2) Size 1 (m2) Size 2 (m2) Cost 1 (USD) Factor Cost (USD) Cost (MXN)
20 1.852898396 1.614978077 20000 0.68 18215.63072 372327.4918
Table 34
Installation Cost
Retail Price Installation Factor Cost (USD) Cost (MXN)
18215.63072 1.61 29327.16545 599447.2619
Table 35
Price
Size 1(ft2) Size 1 (m2) Size 2 (m2) Cost 1 (USD) Size exponent Cost (USD) Cost (MXN)
20 1.852898396 3.465879157 20000 0.68 30617.0982 625813.4871
Table 37
Installation Costs
Retail Price Installation Factor Cost (USD) Cost (MXN)
30617.0982 1.61 49293.52809 1007559.714
Table 38
EXCHANGER E-511
Price
Size 1(ft2) Size 1 (m2) Size 2 (m2) Cost 1 (USD) Factor Cost (USD) Cost (MXN)
20 1.852898396 2.4225 20000 0.68 23998.84154 490536.3212
Table 40
Installation Cost
Retail Price Installation Factor Cost (USD) Cost (MXN)
23998.84154 1.61 38638.1349 789763.477
Table 41
ATMOSPHERIC DATA:
• Wind: 2.5 meters/second from E at 10 meters
• Ground Roughness: urban or forest Cloud Cover: 5 tenths
• Air Temperature: 29° C
• Stability Class: D (user override)
• No Inversion Height Relative Humidity: 36%
SOURCE STRENGTH:
• Direct Source: 2.15 kilograms/sec Source Height: 4 meters
• Release Duration: 60 minutes
• Release Rate: 129 kilograms/min
• Total Amount Released: 7,740 kilograms
THREAT ZONE:
• Threat Modeled: Flammable Area of Vapor Cloud
• Model Run: Heavy Gas
• Red: 41 meters --- (7200 ppm = 60% LEL = Flame Pockets)
Note: Threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-field patchiness make
dispersion predictions less reliable for short distances.
• Yellow: 114 meters --- (1200 ppm = 10% LEL)
A leakage in this line will significance a considerable loss of heptane. Heptene is a toxic
substance and inflammable, this represents a threat and a risk for human health. In this
scenario.
Conclusion
Throughout what we have elaborated form this industrial process we have elaborated a
series of concentrically heat exchangers and we have been able to design some of these
exchangers from which we have based their application for the industrial process,
production of heptenes. We also designed a shell and line exchanger. It´s of significant
importance that the technical developments of these exchangers are of considerable
importance, because they are the ones responsible that the entire process works
efficiently.
The making of this activity made us realize the importance of taking care of the energy
and all the other viable solutions that we could have in situations of energy wastes, like a
non-isolated exchanger or a leakage of the organic gases.
All the processes we have elaborated for the optimization of a heat exchanger are of
immense importance in our future, the reason is that we will use all of our previous
knowledge and the basic stuff in the industry and also in our following classes these next
years to come.
Bibliography
KERN, D. Q. Process heat transfer En el texto: (Kern, 1990) Bibliografía: Kern, D. (1990). Process
heat transfer. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
ÇENGEL, Y. A. Y GHAJAR, A. J. Transferencia de calor y de masa En el texto: (Çengel and
Ghajar, 2011) Bibliografía: Çengel, Y. and Ghajar, A. (2011). Transferencia de calor y de masa.
1st ed. México D. F. [etc.]: McGraw Hill.
ALDERETES, C., MALOCCHI, M. Facultad Regional Resistencia, Depto. de Ingeniería Química.
Cátedra de Tecnología de Energía Térmica e Intercambiadores de Calor de Placas. Cálculo y
Selección de Equipos. 2002.
Huff, G. A. 1976. Selecting a vacuum producer. Chemical Engineering (March). Kharbanda, O.
P. 1979. Process Plant and Equipment Cost Estimation. Craftsman Book Co., Solana Beach, CA.
Klumpar, L. V., and S. T. Stavsky. 1985. Updated cost factors: process equipment. Chemical
Engineering (July 22):73-77.
-. 1985. Commodity materials. Chemical Engineering (Aug. 19):76-77.
-. 1985. Installation labor. Chemical Engineering (Sept. 16):85-87.
Pikulik, A., and H. E. Diaz. 1977. Cost estimating for major process equipment. Chemical
Engineering (Oct. 10): 107-122.
Purohit, G. P. 1985. Cost of double-pipe and multitube heat exchangers. Chemical Engineering
(March 4):92-96. (April 1):85-86.
Felder R. (2014). Principios elementales de los procesos químicos (3 a. ed.). México: Limusa
Wiley.
McCabe, W. L., Smith, J. C., & Harriott, P. (2007). Operaciones unitarias en ingeniería química
(7ma ed.). México: McGraw-Hill.
Nevers, Noel (1991). Mecánica de fluidos para ingenieros químicos (2da ed.). México: McGraw-
Hill.
TURTON. Analysis, Syntesis and Desing of Chemical Process En el texto: (Turton., 2009)
Bibliografía: Turton. (2009). Analysis, Syntesis and Desing of Chemical Process. 1st ed.
Prentice Hall.
White, F. M. (1998). Fluid mechanics (4ta ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 771
Appendixes
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4